Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Final vote

2022 discharge: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (the ‘EPPO’)

A9-0117/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Proposal for a decision

Adopted

For
487
Against
87
Abstained
18

roll-call vote at 13:06 · 82% of votes cast in favour

How the groups voted

A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.

GroupForAgainstAbstainedofLine
The Left8109For
Greens240024For
S&D580058For
Renew380038For
EPP800080For
ECR617225Against
Patriots517325Against
ESN0134Abstained
No group3205—

“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.

Every MEP

25 MEPs of 592 Clear filters

Adam Bielan Poland · ECR
Against
Alexandr Vondra Czechia · ECR
For voted against their group’s line
Anna Zalewska Poland · ECR
Against
Assita Kanko Belgium · ECR
For voted against their group’s line
Beata Szydło Poland · ECR
Against
Bert-Jan Ruissen Netherlands · ECR
Against
Bogdan Rzońca Poland · ECR
Against
Carlo Fidanza Italy · ECR
Against
Charlie Weimers Sweden · ECR
Abstained voted against their group’s line
Chiara Gemma Italy · ECR
Against
Denis Nesci Italy · ECR
Against
Dominik Tarczyński Poland · ECR
Against
Emmanouil Fragkos Greece · ECR
For voted against their group’s line
Jaak Madison Estonia · ECR
Abstained voted against their group’s line
Jadwiga Wiśniewska Poland · ECR
Against
Against
Johan van Overtveldt Belgium · ECR
For voted against their group’s line
Kosma Złotowski Poland · ECR
Against
Nicola Procaccini Italy · ECR
For voted against their group’s line
Nicolas Bay France · ECR
Against
Pietro Fiocchi Italy · ECR
Against
Roberts Zīle Latvia · ECR
Against
Sergio Berlato Italy · ECR
Against
Veronika Vrecionová Czechia · ECR
For voted against their group’s line
Waldemar Tomaszewski Lithuania · ECR
Against

“” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.

Download CSV of these MEPs

← The decision All 4 votes on it