Paragraph 5 — part 2
The immediate risk of mass starvation in Gaza and the attacks on humanitarian aid deliveries
RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 5/2
Adopted
- For
- 374
- Against
- 127
- Abstained
- 32
roll-call vote at 12:13 · 70% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘recognises the indispensable role of UNRWA in the region;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | For |
| Greens | 27 | 0 | 1 | 28 | For |
| S&D | 52 | 2 | 1 | 55 | For |
| Renew | 25 | 8 | 2 | 35 | For |
| EPP | 45 | 15 | 9 | 69 | Divided |
| ECR | 1 | 21 | 0 | 22 | Against |
| Patriots | 10 | 11 | 0 | 21 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | Divided |
| No group | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
11 MEPs of 533 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.