Amendment 9 — part 2, after paragraph 7
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2024
A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 7 – Am 9/2
Rejected
- For
- 266
- Against
- 307
- Abstained
- 4
roll-call vote at 17:24 · 46% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Renew
The part voted on: ‘Calls on the Commission to ensure quality jobs and fair working conditions through a revision of the Public Procurement Directive1a to further strengthen the social clause and to introduce social conditionalities and gender equality requirements for European funds and State aid to ensure quality jobs and collective bargaining; considers that this revision should help Member States meet the objective of an 80 % collective bargaining coverage rate as set out in the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive; furthermore’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | For |
| Greens | 26 | 0 | 0 | 26 | For |
| S&D | 59 | 0 | 1 | 60 | For |
| Renew | 17 | 17 | 0 | 34 | Divided |
| EPP | 4 | 77 | 0 | 81 | Against |
| ECR | 1 | 21 | 0 | 22 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | Against |
| No group | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
6 MEPs of 577 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.