Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Amendment 8 — part 1, after paragraph 1

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2024

A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 1 – Am 8/1

Adopted

For
327
Against
226
Abstained
29

roll-call vote at 17:21 · 56% of votes cast in favour

Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Renew

The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘through applicable European and national legislative provisions; calls for the housing sector to be included as one of the Social Services of General Interest, and not only social housing, as this is essential to guarantee the right to affordable and decent housing for all; asks the Commission to revise the EU State aid rules to broaden the target group for affordable housing in order to guarantee an adequate supply of affordable housing for all, as well as the following measures: preventing any privatisation of public or social housing that would reduce the capacity of the state to ensure the right to adequate housing, and maintaining a regulatory framework for rented housing that safeguards security of tenure and ensures affordable housing for tenants, including through rent caps, controls or rent freezes where needed; highlights that the EU and Member States should ensure the provision of sufficient, adequate and affordable social housing to cover the housing needs of the three bottom quintiles of society and reduce by half the overburden of housing costs faced by these groups by 2030 and should establish a standard that at least 30 % of all new houses be affordable housing for the lower-income group, and at least 30 % affordable housing for the middle-income group calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce green social housing in their housing investment plans, including social housing sustainability criteria, as well as other aspects such as the provision of care facilities, access to recreational facilities, community centres, parks and green spaces especially in the most deprived areas, as a way to improve residents’ living conditions;’

How the groups voted

A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.

GroupForAgainstAbstainedofLine
The Left120012For
Greens270027For
S&D580563For
Renew2310134For
EPP774081Against
ECR119222Against
Patriots814325Divided
ESN1124Divided
No group4026—

“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.

Every MEP

22 MEPs of 582 Clear filters

Adam Bielan Poland · ECR
Against
Alexandr Vondra Czechia · ECR
Against
Anna Zalewska Poland · ECR
Against
Assita Kanko Belgium · ECR
Abstained voted against their group’s line
Beata Szydło Poland · ECR
Against
Bert-Jan Ruissen Netherlands · ECR
Against
Bogdan Rzońca Poland · ECR
Against
Charlie Weimers Sweden · ECR
Against
Cristian Terheş Romania · ECR
Against
Denis Nesci Italy · ECR
Against
Dominik Tarczyński Poland · ECR
Against
Elena Yoncheva Bulgaria · ECR
For voted against their group’s line
Jaak Madison Estonia · ECR
Against
Jadwiga Wiśniewska Poland · ECR
Against
Against
Johan van Overtveldt Belgium · ECR
Abstained voted against their group’s line
Kosma Złotowski Poland · ECR
Against
Nicolas Bay France · ECR
Against
Patryk Jaki Poland · ECR
Against
Pietro Fiocchi Italy · ECR
Against
Sergio Berlato Italy · ECR
Against
Veronika Vrecionová Czechia · ECR
Against

“” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.

Download CSV of these MEPs

← The decision All 41 votes on it