Amendment 20 — part 2 to recital 39
Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed
A9-0014/2024 – Jessica Polfjärd – Recital 39 – Am 20/2
Rejected
- For
- 283
- Against
- 317
- Abstained
- 14
roll-call vote at 13:30 · 46% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens, The Left · split vote by The Left
The part voted on: ‘Member States should not unilaterally derogate from the provisions set out in this Regulation in a way that would restrict, prohibit or hinder the free movement, placing on the market and deliberate release of NGT plants or NGT products within the territory of the Union.’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 | Against |
| Greens | 1 | 28 | 0 | 29 | Against |
| S&D | 20 | 38 | 0 | 58 | Divided |
| Renew | 24 | 15 | 1 | 40 | Divided |
| EPP | 69 | 10 | 5 | 84 | For |
| ECR | 12 | 14 | 0 | 26 | Divided |
| Patriots | 9 | 15 | 0 | 24 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | Against |
| No group | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
2 MEPs of 614 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.