Amendment 5 — part 2 to recital 9
Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed
A9-0014/2024 – Jessica Polfjärd – Recital 9 – Am 5/2
Adopted
- For
- 373
- Against
- 207
- Abstained
- 41
roll-call vote at 13:24 · 60% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Greens
The part voted on: deletion of ‘Moreover, there is no indication that current requirements in the Union GMO legislation for GMOs obtained by transgenesis need adaptation at the present time.’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | 13 | 0 | 14 | Against |
| Greens | 26 | 2 | 1 | 29 | For |
| S&D | 52 | 5 | 0 | 57 | For |
| Renew | 4 | 36 | 0 | 40 | Against |
| EPP | 70 | 7 | 9 | 86 | For |
| ECR | 13 | 12 | 1 | 26 | Divided |
| Patriots | 14 | 7 | 4 | 25 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Divided |
| No group | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
4 MEPs of 621 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.