Amendment 164 — part 2, after recital 1
Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed
A9-0014/2024 – Jessica Polfjärd – After recital 1 – Am 164/2
Rejected
- For
- 154
- Against
- 331
- Abstained
- 126
roll-call vote at 13:20 · 25% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ID, The Left · split vote by ID
The part voted on: ‘In this regard, an immediate end also needs to be put to free trade agreements that push farmers to the lowest social and environmental standard to keep up with unfair international competition.’ without the word ‘immediate’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | For |
| Greens | 13 | 2 | 12 | 27 | Divided |
| S&D | 5 | 16 | 36 | 57 | Divided |
| Renew | 0 | 35 | 2 | 37 | Against |
| EPP | 7 | 73 | 6 | 86 | Against |
| ECR | 2 | 24 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| Patriots | 17 | 8 | 0 | 25 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Divided |
| No group | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
11 MEPs of 611 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.