Fundamental rights and Rule of Law in Slovenia, in particular the delayed nomination of EPPO prosecutors — B9-0588/2021 — Proposal for a resolution (whole text)
Fundamental rights and Rule of Law in Slovenia, in particular the delayed nomination of EPPO prosecutors — B9-0588/2021 — Proposal for a resolution (whole text)
Fundamental rights and Rule of Law in Slovenia, in particular the delayed nomination of EPPO prosecutors - B9-0588/2021 - Proposal for a resolution (whole text)
Result not yet in the record
- For
- 356
- Against
- 284
- Abstained
- 40
roll-call vote at 15:32 · 52% of votes cast in favour
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | For |
| Greens | 29 | 0 | 0 | 29 | For |
| S&D | 59 | 0 | 0 | 59 | For |
| Renew | 38 | 1 | 0 | 39 | For |
| EPP | 6 | 79 | 12 | 97 | Against |
| ECR | 2 | 26 | 0 | 28 | Against |
| Patriots | 1 | 28 | 0 | 29 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | Against |
| No group | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
3 MEPs of 680 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.