amendment list, 16 April 2025
Protection of animals during transport and related operations
Document CJ48-AM-773030 · (COM(2023)0770 – C9-0446/2023 – 2023/0448(COD))
Committee on Transport and Tourism Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
Full text
Jump to an amendment (446)
- Amendment 651
- Amendment 652
- Amendment 653
- Amendment 654
- Amendment 655
- Amendment 656
- Amendment 657
- Amendment 658
- Amendment 659
- Amendment 660
- Amendment 661
- Amendment 662
- Amendment 663
- Amendment 664
- Amendment 665
- Amendment 666
- Amendment 667
- Amendment 668
- Amendment 669
- Amendment 670
- Amendment 671
- Amendment 672
- Amendment 673
- Amendment 674
- Amendment 675
- Amendment 676
- Amendment 677
- Amendment 678
- Amendment 679
- Amendment 680
- Amendment 681
- Amendment 682
- Amendment 683
- Amendment 684
- Amendment 685
- Amendment 686
- Amendment 687
- Amendment 688
- Amendment 689
- Amendment 690
- Amendment 691
- Amendment 692
- Amendment 693
- Amendment 694
- Amendment 695
- Amendment 696
- Amendment 697
- Amendment 698
- Amendment 699
- Amendment 700
- Amendment 701
- Amendment 702
- Amendment 703
- Amendment 704
- Amendment 705
- Amendment 706
- Amendment 707
- Amendment 708
- Amendment 709
- Amendment 710
- Amendment 711
- Amendment 712
- Amendment 713
- Amendment 714
- Amendment 715
- Amendment 716
- Amendment 717
- Amendment 718
- Amendment 719
- Amendment 720
- Amendment 721
- Amendment 722
- Amendment 723
- Amendment 724
- Amendment 725
- Amendment 726
- Amendment 727
- Amendment 728
- Amendment 729
- Amendment 730
- Amendment 731
- Amendment 732
- Amendment 733
- Amendment 734
- Amendment 735
- Amendment 736
- Amendment 737
- Amendment 738
- Amendment 739
- Amendment 740
- Amendment 741
- Amendment 742
- Amendment 743
- Amendment 744
- Amendment 745
- Amendment 746
- Amendment 747
- Amendment 748
- Amendment 749
- Amendment 750
- Amendment 751
- Amendment 752
- Amendment 753
- Amendment 754
- Amendment 755
- Amendment 756
- Amendment 757
- Amendment 758
- Amendment 759
- Amendment 760
- Amendment 761
- Amendment 762
- Amendment 763
- Amendment 764
- Amendment 765
- Amendment 766
- Amendment 767
- Amendment 768
- Amendment 769
- Amendment 770
- Amendment 771
- Amendment 772
- Amendment 773
- Amendment 774
- Amendment 775
- Amendment 776
- Amendment 777
- Amendment 778
- Amendment 779
- Amendment 780
- Amendment 781
- Amendment 782
- Amendment 783
- Amendment 784
- Amendment 785
- Amendment 786
- Amendment 787
- Amendment 788
- Amendment 789
- Amendment 790
- Amendment 791
- Amendment 792
- Amendment 793
- Amendment 794
- Amendment 795
- Amendment 796
- Amendment 797
- Amendment 798
- Amendment 799
- Amendment 800
- Amendment 801
- Amendment 802
- Amendment 803
- Amendment 804
- Amendment 805
- Amendment 806
- Amendment 807
- Amendment 808
- Amendment 809
- Amendment 810
- Amendment 811
- Amendment 812
- Amendment 813
- Amendment 814
- Amendment 815
- Amendment 816
- Amendment 817
- Amendment 818
- Amendment 819
- Amendment 820
- Amendment 821
- Amendment 822
- Amendment 823
- Amendment 824
- Amendment 825
- Amendment 826
- Amendment 827
- Amendment 828
- Amendment 829
- Amendment 830
- Amendment 831
- Amendment 832
- Amendment 833
- Amendment 834
- Amendment 835
- Amendment 836
- Amendment 837
- Amendment 838
- Amendment 839
- Amendment 840
- Amendment 841
- Amendment 842
- Amendment 843
- Amendment 844
- Amendment 845
- Amendment 846
- Amendment 847
- Amendment 848
- Amendment 849
- Amendment 850
- Amendment 851
- Amendment 852
- Amendment 853
- Amendment 854
- Amendment 855
- Amendment 856
- Amendment 857
- Amendment 858
- Amendment 859
- Amendment 860
- Amendment 861
- Amendment 862
- Amendment 863
- Amendment 864
- Amendment 865
- Amendment 866
- Amendment 867
- Amendment 868
- Amendment 869
- Amendment 870
- Amendment 871
- Amendment 872
- Amendment 873
- Amendment 874
- Amendment 875
- Amendment 876
- Amendment 877
- Amendment 878
- Amendment 879
- Amendment 880
- Amendment 881
- Amendment 882
- Amendment 883
- Amendment 884
- Amendment 885
- Amendment 886
- Amendment 887
- Amendment 888
- Amendment 889
- Amendment 890
- Amendment 891
- Amendment 892
- Amendment 893
- Amendment 894
- Amendment 895
- Amendment 896
- Amendment 897
- Amendment 898
- Amendment 899
- Amendment 900
- Amendment 901
- Amendment 902
- Amendment 903
- Amendment 904
- Amendment 905
- Amendment 906
- Amendment 907
- Amendment 908
- Amendment 909
- Amendment 910
- Amendment 911
- Amendment 912
- Amendment 913
- Amendment 914
- Amendment 915
- Amendment 916
- Amendment 917
- Amendment 918
- Amendment 919
- Amendment 920
- Amendment 921
- Amendment 922
- Amendment 923
- Amendment 924
- Amendment 925
- Amendment 926
- Amendment 927
- Amendment 928
- Amendment 929
- Amendment 930
- Amendment 931
- Amendment 932
- Amendment 933
- Amendment 934
- Amendment 935
- Amendment 936
- Amendment 937
- Amendment 938
- Amendment 939
- Amendment 940
- Amendment 941
- Amendment 942
- Amendment 943
- Amendment 944
- Amendment 945
- Amendment 946
- Amendment 947
- Amendment 948
- Amendment 949
- Amendment 950
- Amendment 951
- Amendment 952
- Amendment 953
- Amendment 954
- Amendment 955
- Amendment 956
- Amendment 957
- Amendment 958
- Amendment 959
- Amendment 960
- Amendment 961
- Amendment 962
- Amendment 963
- Amendment 964
- Amendment 965
- Amendment 966
- Amendment 967
- Amendment 968
- Amendment 969
- Amendment 970
- Amendment 971
- Amendment 972
- Amendment 973
- Amendment 974
- Amendment 975
- Amendment 976
- Amendment 977
- Amendment 978
- Amendment 979
- Amendment 980
- Amendment 981
- Amendment 982
- Amendment 983
- Amendment 984
- Amendment 985
- Amendment 986
- Amendment 987
- Amendment 988
- Amendment 989
- Amendment 990
- Amendment 991
- Amendment 992
- Amendment 993
- Amendment 994
- Amendment 995
- Amendment 996
- Amendment 997
- Amendment 998
- Amendment 999
- Amendment 1000
- Amendment 1001
- Amendment 1002
- Amendment 1003
- Amendment 1004
- Amendment 1005
- Amendment 1006
- Amendment 1007
- Amendment 1008
- Amendment 1009
- Amendment 1010
- Amendment 1011
- Amendment 1012
- Amendment 1013
- Amendment 1014
- Amendment 1015
- Amendment 1016
- Amendment 1017
- Amendment 1018
- Amendment 1019
- Amendment 1020
- Amendment 1021
- Amendment 1022
- Amendment 1023
- Amendment 1024
- Amendment 1025
- Amendment 1026
- Amendment 1027
- Amendment 1028
- Amendment 1029
- Amendment 1030
- Amendment 1031
- Amendment 1032
- Amendment 1033
- Amendment 1034
- Amendment 1035
- Amendment 1036
- Amendment 1037
- Amendment 1038
- Amendment 1039
- Amendment 1040
- Amendment 1041
- Amendment 1042
- Amendment 1043
- Amendment 1044
- Amendment 1045
- Amendment 1046
- Amendment 1047
- Amendment 1048
- Amendment 1049
- Amendment 1050
- Amendment 1051
- Amendment 1052
- Amendment 1053
- Amendment 1054
- Amendment 1055
- Amendment 1056
- Amendment 1057
- Amendment 1058
- Amendment 1059
- Amendment 1060
- Amendment 1061
- Amendment 1062
- Amendment 1063
- Amendment 1064
- Amendment 1065
- Amendment 1066
- Amendment 1067
- Amendment 1068
- Amendment 1069
- Amendment 1070
- Amendment 1071
- Amendment 1072
- Amendment 1073
- Amendment 1074
- Amendment 1075
- Amendment 1076
- Amendment 1077
- Amendment 1078
- Amendment 1079
- Amendment 1080
- Amendment 1081
- Amendment 1082
- Amendment 1083
- Amendment 1084
- Amendment 1085
- Amendment 1086
- Amendment 1087
- Amendment 1088
- Amendment 1089
- Amendment 1090
- Amendment 1091
- Amendment 1092
- Amendment 1093
- Amendment 1094
- Amendment 1095
- Amendment 1096
Text 2,822 paragraphs
Amendment 651
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 14
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 14. ‘vehicle’ means a means of transport fitted with wheels which is propelled or towed; | 14. ‘vehicle’ means a means of transport fitted with wheels which is propelled or towed. The transport of aquatic animals by vessels engaged in primary production, vessels used in aquaculture and extractive fishing, nursery boat or tank boat is excluded from this definition; |
Or. en
Amendment 652
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 15. ‘Animal welfare officer’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of transported animals by livestock vessel for the duration of the journey at sea; | 15. ‘Animal welfare officer’ means an independent verterinarian, not directly employed by a transporter or organiser, directly in charge of the welfare of transported animals by livestock vessel, container vessel or roll-on-roll-off vessel for the duration of the journey at sea; |
Read the rest (2,810 paragraphs)
Or. en
Justification
Avoids conflict of interests and ensures adequate level of training for all vessel types
Amendment 653
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 15. ‘Animal welfare officer’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of transported animals by livestock vessel for the duration of the journey at sea; | 15. ‘Animal welfare officer’ means a person licensed as a veterinarian and independent from the transporter directly in charge of the welfare of transported animals by livestock vessel for the duration of the journey at sea; |
Or. en
Amendment 654
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 15. ‘Animal welfare officer’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of transported animals by livestock vessel for the duration of the journey at sea; | 15. ‘Animal welfare officer’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of transported animals by livestock vessel for the duration of the journey at sea and who has received appropriate training and holds a certificate of competence; |
Or. en
Amendment 655
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 15. ‘Animal welfare officer’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of transported animals by livestock vessel for the duration of the journey at sea; | 15. ‘Animal welfare officer’ means a trained person who holds a certificate of competence and is directly in charge of the welfare of transported animals by livestock vessel for the duration of the journey at sea; |
Or. en
Amendment 656
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. ‘livestock vessel’ means a sea-going vessel which has been built or adapted to be used for the transport of terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits; | 16. ‘livestock vessel’ means a sea-going vessel which has been built or adapted within the last five years to be used for the transport of terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits, and meets the requirements of being ranked in the whitelist of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), having camera surveillance on board and being equipped with temperature, humidity and ammonia measuring systems on all decks where the animals are situated; |
Or. en
Amendment 657
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. ‘livestock vessel’ means a sea-going vessel which has been built or adapted to be used for the transport of terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits; | 16. ‘livestock vessel’ means a sea-going vessel which has been built or adapted to be used for the transport of terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits; this sea-going vessel is not a roll-on-roll-off vessel, any other vessel carrying animals in moveable containers, nor a specialized vessel for transporting farmed fish |
Or. en
Amendment 658
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. ‘livestock vessel’ means a sea-going vessel which has been built or adapted to be used for the transport of terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits; | 16. ‘livestock vessel’ means a sea-going vessel which has been built or adapted to be used for the transport of terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits, and excluding well-boats used for farmed fish; |
Or. fr
Justification
It is worth clarifying that this definition does not include vessels used for farmed fish, which are completely different to livestock vessels and are referred to in the relevant annex, albeit without being clearly defined.
Amendment 659
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 16. ‘livestock vessel’ means a sea-going vessel which has been built or adapted to be used for the transport of terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits; | 16. ‘livestock vessel’ means a sea-going vessel which has been built or adapted to be used for the transport of terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds, rabbits, or game bird species; |
Or. en
Amendment 660
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 17
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 17. ‘container’ means any crate, box, receptacle or other rigid structure used for the transport of animals which is not a means of transport; | 17. ‘container’ means any cage, crate, box, receptacle or other movable structure used for the transport of animals which is not a means of transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 661
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 17
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 17. ‘container’ means any crate, box, receptacle or other rigid structure used for the transport of animals which is not a means of transport; | 17. ‘container’ means any crate, box, cage, receptacle or other rigid structure used for the transport of animals which is not a means of transport; |
Or. fr
Amendment 662
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 18
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 18. ‘container vessel’ means a vessel carrying terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits in moveable containers; | 18. ‘vessel intended for the transport of livestock’ means a vessel carrying terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds, rabbits, or game bird species in moveable containers; |
Or. en
Amendment 663
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 18
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 18. ‘container vessel’ means a vessel carrying terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits in moveable containers; | 18. ‘container vessel’ means a vessel carrying aquatic or terrestrial animals, other than domestic birds or rabbits in moveable containers; |
Or. en
Amendment 664
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae, and animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine species, cervids, rabbits and domestic birds, including poultry; | 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae and bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine, and cervids species, as well as rabbits, dogs, cats, domestic ferrets, and domestic birds, including poultry; |
Or. en
Justification
Dogs, cats, and domestic ferrets should be included in the definition of terrestrial animals in animal transport regulations to ensure consistent health, welfare, and movement controls. Their classification aligns with livestock species subject to transport rules, as they are frequently moved across borders for trade, adoption, and personal travel.
Amendment 665
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae, and animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine species, cervids, rabbits and domestic birds, including poultry; | 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae, and animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine species, cervids, rabbits and birds, including poultry; |
Or. en
Amendment 666
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae, and animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine species, cervids, rabbits and domestic birds, including poultry; | 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae, and animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine species, cervids, rabbits and domestic birds, including poultry and game birds; |
Or. es
Amendment 667
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae, and animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine species, cervids, rabbits and domestic birds, including poultry; | 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae, and animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine species, cervids, rabbits, domestic birds, or game bird species, including poultry; |
Or. en
Amendment 668
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae, and animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine species, cervids, rabbits and domestic birds, including poultry; | 19. ‘terrestrial animals’ means kept equidae and camelids, and animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine species, cervids, rabbits and domestic birds, including poultry; |
Or. fr
Amendment 669
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 21
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 21. ‘container for large animals’ means a container used for transport of terrestrial animals other than domestic birds and rabbits on means of transport by road, rail or container vessels; | 21. ‘container for large animals’ means a container used for transport of terrestrial animals other than domestic birds, rabbits and game bird species on means of transport by road, rail or container vessels; |
Or. en
Amendment 670
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. ‘official veterinarian’ means an official veterinarian as defined in Article 3(32) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; | 22. ‘official veterinarian’ means a veterinarian appointed by a competent authority, either as staff or otherwise, and appropriately qualified to perform official controls and other official activities in accordance with this Regulation and the relevant rules referred to in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; |
Or. en
Amendment 671
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. ‘official veterinarian’ means an official veterinarian as defined in Article 3(32) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; | 22. ‘official veterinarian’ means an official veterinarian as defined in Article 3(32) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 empowered by the competent authority to supervise the related operaitons of animal transport, as well as loading and unloading; |
Or. en
Amendment 672
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 22. ‘official veterinarian’ means an official veterinarian as defined in Article 3(32) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; | 22. ‘official veterinarian’ means an official veterinarian as defined in Article 3(32) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625, who operates independently from the transporter; |
Or. en
Amendment 673
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; | 23. ‘assembly centre’ means a place such as holdings, collection centres and markets, at which domestic Equidae or domestic animals of bovine, ovine, caprine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together to form consignments; |
Or. en
Amendment 674
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; | 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment such as a market or collection centre where kept equidae and camelids or domestic animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; |
Or. fr
Amendment 675
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; | 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 93 or approved in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where: (a) terrestrial animals originating from more than one establishment are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; or (b) consignments of terrestrial animals are unloaded and distributed to more than one establishment. |
Or. en
Amendment 676
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; | 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations , including markets and auction centres, registered in accordance with Article 93 and 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429, respectively, where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one establishment are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; |
Or. en
Amendment 677
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; | 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429, holdings, collection centres and markets where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; |
Or. en
Amendment 678
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; | 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from one or more different holdings are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; |
Or. en
Amendment 679
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from more than one holding are grouped together temporarily to form a consignment; | 23. ‘assembly centre’ means an establishment for assembly operations registered in accordance with Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 where animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine, equine or porcine species originating from one or more different holdings are grouped together temporarily to form consignments; |
Or. en
Amendment 680
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport via road, rail, sea and air, including the time for loading and unloading the animals, from the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, including rest periods and and transfer from one means of transport to the other, whether inside or outside the Union; |
Or. en
Amendment 681
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport starting from the moment the last animal of a consignment is loaded onto the means of transport until the arrival at the final destination, including all stops and delays during the journey; |
Or. en
Amendment 682
Pekka Toveri
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time taken for loading at the place of departure or unloading the animals at the final destination; |
Or. en
Amendment 683
Merja Kyllönen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
2023/0448(COD)
Article 3 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time the vehicle is standing dureing the journey; |
Or. en
Justification
Including the loading and unloading processes in the ''journey" and ''journey time" definitions puts undue pressure on animal handlers and transporters. Since loading and unloading are considered risky and stressful processes for both the animals and personnel, they should have no time constraints. In addition, Regulation (EC) No 56112006 does not calculate loading and unloading times as driving time when optimizing transports.
Amendment 684
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport; |
Or. fr
Amendment 685
Stefan Köhler, Jens Gieseke, Lena Düpont, Marion Walsmann, Christine Schneider, Norbert Lins, Alexandra Mehnert
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport; |
Or. de
Amendment 686
Emma Wiesner, Christine Singer
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 687
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport; |
Or. en
Justification
In order to avoid stress, no time pressure should be put on the moment of loading and unloading.
Amendment 688
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 689
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 690
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 691
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport; |
Or. es
Justification
Since loading and unloading are the most complex processes in the handling of animals during transport, it seems unwise for this article to encourage the performance of these tasks with haste and stress, which is detrimental to the farmer, the driver and the transported animals.
Amendment 692
Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella, Matteo Ricci
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport; |
Or. it
Amendment 693
Carlo Fidanza, Sergio Berlato, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Ventola
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport; |
Or. it
Amendment 694
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time for loading, stopping and unloading the animals; |
Or. en
Justification
Including the loading and unloading processes in the “journey” and “journey time” definitions puts undue pressure on animal handlers and transporters. Since loading and unloading are considered risky and stressful processes for both the animals and personnel, they should have no time constraints. In addition, Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 does not calculate loading and unloading times as driving time when optimising transports
Amendment 695
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding any loading and unloading operations; |
Or. en
Amendment 696
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding loading and unloading operations; |
Or. en
Amendment 697
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time for loading and unloading the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 698
Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time for loading and unloading the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 699
Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time for loading and unloading the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 700
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Emma Wiesner, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time for loading and unloading the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 701
Veronika Vrecionová, Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time for loading and unloading the animals; |
Or. en
Justification
Including loading and unloading in the total journey time may unintentionally create pressure to accelerate these procedures, which could affect animal welfare. As loading durations vary significantly between species, it may be more appropriate not to count the loading time to the overall journey time calculation.
Amendment 702
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time for loading and unloading the animals; |
Or. en
Justification
"Journey time" differs from "transport time," as a journey can comprise multiple transport legs using various modes of transport.
Amendment 703
Stanislav Stoyanov
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, including the time for loading and unloading the animals; | 25. ‘journey time’ means the time period during which animals are moved by means of transport, excluding the time for loading and unloading the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 704
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 26
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. ‘keeper’ means any natural or legal person, except a transporter, in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis; | 26. ‘Animal keeper’ means any natural or legal person, except a transporter, in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis, before and until the time of transport; 1a; |
| 1a 1. This amendment shall apply throughout the text. |
Or. en
Amendment 705
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 26
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. ‘keeper’ means any natural or legal person, except a transporter, in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis; | 26. ‘animal keeper’ means any natural or legal person, except a transporter, in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis, before and up to the time of transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 706
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 26
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. ‘keeper’ means any natural or legal person, except a transporter, in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis; | 26. ‘animal keeper’ means any natural or legal person, except a transporter, in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis, before and up to the time of transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 707
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 26
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. ‘keeper’ means any natural or legal person, except a transporter, in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis; | 26. ‘keeper of the animals’ means any natural or legal person in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis, right up until the animals are transported; |
Or. fr
Justification
In order to ensure that the responsibilities incumbent on the different operators involved in the transport process, such as those responsible for keeping and handling the animals respectively, the transporters and the organisers, are apportioned in a consistent, proportionate and rational manner, a new definition is required (‘keeper of the animals’).
Amendment 708
Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella, Matteo Ricci
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 26
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26. ‘keeper’ means any natural or legal person, except a transporter, in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis; | 26. ‘keeper’ means any natural or legal person in charge of or handling animals whether on a permanent or temporary basis, until they are transported; |
Or. it
Amendment 709
Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 26 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 26 a. 'breeding animals’ are defined as animals that are being transported for the purpose of reproduction. This includes animals that are specifically selected, kept, or transported with the intention of contributing to breeding and or conservation programs. |
Or. en
Amendment 710
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 30. ‘rest period’ means a continuous period in the course of a journey during which animals are not being moved by a means of transport; | 30. ‘rest period’ means a continuous period in the course of a journey during which animals are not being moved by a means of transport and are unloaded to rest; |
Or. en
Amendment 711
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 31 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 31 a. ‘climate controlled transport‘is the movement of animals in a means of transport that uses any mechanical system, which may include heating, cooling, humidity control, and air distribution, to meet the environmental needs of the animal during the journey; |
Or. en
Amendment 712
Philippe Olivier, Valérie Deloge, Julien Leonardelli, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33. ‘unbroken equine animal’ means an equine animal that cannot be tied or led by a halter without causing avoidable excitement, pain or suffering. | 33. ‘unbroken equine animal’ means an equine animal that has not been trained to be tied or led by a halter without avoidable stress, pain or suffering being caused to it. |
Or. fr
Justification
‘Cannot’ is not the right word here. For unbroken horses, it is not a question of their being able to be tied up; rather a lack of training. ‘Stress’ would be a more accurate description of their reaction than ‘excitement’.
Amendment 713
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 a. ‘climate-controlled vehicle’ means a vehicle destined for the movement of animals that uses any adequate system to control the internal climate, which may include heating and cooling, for maintaining the right climatic paramenters for the animals being transported during the journey. |
Or. en
Amendment 714
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 a. ‘climate-controlled vehicle’ means a vehicle destined for the movement of animals that uses any adequate system to control the internal climate, which may include heating and cooling, for maintaining the right climatic paramenters for the animals being transported during the journey. |
Or. en
Amendment 715
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33a. ‘breeding animal’ means an animal transported for breeding purposes. This includes animals specifically chosen, kept or transported for the purposes of contributing to breeding and/or to species conservation programmes. |
Or. fr
Amendment 716
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 a. ‘vulnerable animals’ include pregnant animals for whom one third or more of the expected gestation period has already passed, or females who have given birth in the previous 8 weeks, unweaned animals, end-of-career animals, lactating and newborn animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 717
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 a. ‘breeding animals’ means an animal that is being transported for the purpose of reproduction, including animals specifically selected, kept, or transported for contributing to breeding and or conservation programs; |
Or. en
Amendment 718
Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 a. 'breeding animals' means an animal that is transported for the purpose of reproduction, including animals specifically selected, kept, or transported for contributing to breeding and or conservation programmes; |
Or. en
Amendment 719
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 b. ‘breeding animals’ means an animal that is being transported for the purpose of reproduction, including animals specifically selected, kept, or transported for contributing to breeding and or conservation programs; |
Or. en
Amendment 720
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 a. ‘transport to slaughter’ means transport with the intention of slaughtering an animal either immediately upon arrival at the place of destination or within a maximum period of two months. |
Or. en
Amendment 721
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 a. ‘nursery boat or tank boat’ means a vessel with a well or tank for transporting live fish; |
Or. en
Amendment 722
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 b. ‘animal welfare’ means the physical and mental state of an animal in relation to the conditions in which it lives and dies. |
Or. en
Amendment 723
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 c. ‘animal welfare’ means the physical and mental state of an animal in relation to the conditions in which it lives and dies. |
Or. en
Amendment 724
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 b. ‘adult animal’ means an animal that is fully weaned and no longer dependent on milk for nutrition. |
Or. en
Amendment 725
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 c. ‘domestic birds’ means those species included in the scientific opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on the welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers. |
Or. en
Amendment 726
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 d (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 33 d. ‘heat wave’ means an episode of at least three consecutive days during which at least 10% of the stations considered record maximum daily temperatures exceeding the 95% percentile of their respective series for the months of July and August during the reference period from 1971 to 2000. |
Or. en
Amendment 727
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article3a | |
| 34 | |
| 34. "heat wave": an episode of at least three consecutive days, in which at least 10% of the stations considered record maximum temperatures above the 95% percentile of their series of daily maximum temperatures for the months of July and August in the period 1971 to 2000. |
Or. en
Amendment 728
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. ‘temperature-controlled transport’ means the use of a mechanical system such as heating, cooling, humidity control or air circulation on the means of transport in order to attend to the needs of the animals in their immediate environment during the journey. |
Or. fr
Justification
The concept of a ‘conditioned vehicle’ should be clearly defined in the proposal.
Amendment 729
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. Animals shall be transported under appropriate conditions to prevent unnecessary harm or suffering. |
Or. en
Amendment 730
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. Animals must be transported in appropriate conditions so as not to cause them unnecessary harm or suffering. |
Or. en
Amendment 731
Marko Vešligaj
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. No animal shall be transported transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. |
Or. en
Amendment 732
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. No animal shall be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. |
Or. fr
Amendment 733
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. No person shall organise transports of animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. |
Or. en
Amendment 734
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause injuries or suffering to it. |
Or. en
Amendment 735
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. No person shall organise transports of animals, transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause injury or undue suffering to it. |
Or. en
Amendment 736
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. No natural or legal person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. |
Or. en
Amendment 737
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes injury or is likely to cause undue serious suffering to it. |
Or. en
Amendment 738
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. | 1. No person shall transport animals or cause animals to be transported in a way that causes injury or is likely to cause undue suffering to it. |
Or. en
Amendment 739
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. This Article shall only apply to transport undertaken for the purposes stipulated in Article 2(2), points (a) to (d). |
Or. fr
Amendment 740
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Any person transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: | 2. All animals shall be transported in accordance with the following requirements: |
Or. fr
Justification
In order to distinguish between the responsibilities incumbent on the different operators involved in the transport process, ‘Any person’ should be replaced with ‘All animals’.
Amendment 741
Marko Vešligaj
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Any person transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: | 2. All animals shall be transported in compliance with the following requirements: |
Or. en
Amendment 742
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Any person transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: | 2. All animals shall be transported in compliance with the following requirements: |
Or. en
Amendment 743
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Any person transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: | 2. All animals shall be transported in compliance with the following requirements: |
Or. en
Amendment 744
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Any person transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: | 2. Any person organising transports of animals, transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with all applicable international, regional, and national laws, regulations, and relevant guidance, in addition to the following requirements, throughout the entire journey: |
Or. en
Amendment 745
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Any person transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: | 2. Any person organising transports of animals, transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: |
Or. en
Amendment 746
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Any person transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: | 2. Any person organising transports of animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: |
Or. en
Amendment 747
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Any person transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: | 2. Any natural or legal person transporting animals or causing animals to be transported shall ensure compliance with the following requirements: |
Or. en
Amendment 748
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; | (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common terrestrial animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, stress, fatigue, injuries, bad air quality, thermal stress and heavily soiled plumage in birds are avoided and animal needs are met throughout the journey; |
Or. en
Amendment 749
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; | (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal health welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries, bad air quality, thermal stress and heavily soiled plumage in birds are avoided and the animals’ needs are met throughout the journey; |
Or. en
Amendment 750
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; | (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries, bad air quality, thermal stress and heavy soiling are avoided and animal needs are met throughout the journey; |
Or. en
Amendment 751
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; | (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries, thermal stress, harmful concentration of ammonia in air or overaccumulation of faeces; |
Or. en
Amendment 752
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; | (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that hazards to the welfare of terrestrial animals, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; |
Or. fr
Justification
Fish must undergo fasting before transportation and do not suffer from thirst. The text should be amended.
Amendment 753
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; | (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised and animal needs are met throughout the journey; |
Or. en
Amendment 754
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; | (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common terrestrial animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; |
Or. en
Amendment 755
Marko Vešligaj
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; | (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common terrestrial animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; |
Or. en
Amendment 756
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards, including suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; | (a) all necessary arrangements have been made in advance to minimise the duration of the journey so that the most common animal welfare hazards such as suffering from hunger, thirst, fatigue, injuries or thermal discomfort are minimised; |
Or. en
Amendment 757
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a a) the journey time of the transport of animals shall not exceed 8 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 758
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the animals are fit for the entire journey; | (b) the animals are fit for the journey; |
Or. en
Justification
It is possible that animals may become unfit for transport during the journey, and therefore it is impossible to guarantee that they will remain fit for transport throughout the entire duration of the journey.
Amendment 759
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the means of transport are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to prevent injury or unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; | (c) the means of transport are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to prevent disease, injury or unnecessary suffering and to ensure the health, welfare and safety of both the animals and the persons involved in the transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 760
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the means of transport are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to prevent injury or unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; | (c) the means of transport are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to prevent disease, injury or unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 761
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the means of transport are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to prevent injury or unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; | (c) the means of transport are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to prevent injury or suffering and to ensure the safety, health and welfare of the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 762
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the means of transport are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to prevent injury or unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; | (c) the means of transport are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to minimise injury or unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 763
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the loading and unloading facilities are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to avoid injury and unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; | (d) the loading and unloading facilities are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to prevent injury and suffering and to ensure the safety, health and welfare of the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 764
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the loading and unloading facilities are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to avoid injury and unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; | (d) the loading and unloading facilities are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to minimise injury and unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 765
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the loading and unloading facilities are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to avoid injury and unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; | (d) the loading and unloading facilities are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to avoid injury and unnecessary stress and suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 766
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the loading and unloading facilities are designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to avoid injury and unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; | (d) the loading and unloading facilities are adequately designed, constructed, maintained and operated in a way to avoid injury and unnecessary suffering and to ensure the safety of the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 767
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) any natural person responsible for the animals at any stage of their transport, is competent for this purpose and for handling the animals transported, and carries out his or her tasks without using violence or any method likely to cause injury or unnecessary suffering to the animals; | (e) any natural person responsible for the animals at any stage of their transport, is competent for this purpose and for handling the animals transported, and carries out his or her tasks without using violence or any method likely to cause injury or unnecessary suffering to the animals; animal farmers are qualified for this task and do not require additional training for transports <50 km; |
Or. en
Amendment 768
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) any natural person responsible for the animals at any stage of their transport, is competent for this purpose and for handling the animals transported, and carries out his or her tasks without using violence or any method likely to cause injury or unnecessary suffering to the animals; | (e) any natural person responsible for the animals at any stage of their transport, is competent for this purpose and for handling the animals transported, and carries out their task without using violence or any method likely to cause injury or suffering to the animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 769
Milan Mazurek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) any natural person responsible for the animals at any stage of their transport, is competent for this purpose and for handling the animals transported, and carries out his or her tasks without using violence or any method likely to cause injury or unnecessary suffering to the animals; | (e) any natural person responsible for the animals at any stage of their transport, is competent for this purpose and for handling the animals transported, and carries out his or her tasks without using excessive violence or any method likely to cause injury or unnecessary suffering to the animals; |
Or. sk
Amendment 770
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) the transport is carried out without undue delay; | (f) the transport is carried out without delay; |
Or. en
Amendment 771
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) the welfare condition of the animals is regularly checked and appropriately maintained; | (g) the welfare condition of the animals is regularly checked and appropriately maintained every 8 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 772
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) the welfare condition of the animals is regularly checked and appropriately maintained; | (g) the welfare condition of the animals is appropriately maintained; |
Or. en
Amendment 773
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point h
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) the floor area and height of the means of transport and the unloading and loading facilities are adapted to the species, size, category of the animals concerned and to the planned journey; | (h) the floor area and height of the means of transport are adapted to the species, size, ethological behaviour, category of the animals concerned and to the planned journey; |
Or. en
Amendment 774
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point h
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) the floor area and height of the means of transport and the unloading and loading facilities are adapted to the species, size, category of the animals concerned and to the planned journey; | (h) the floor area and height of the means of transport and the unloading and loading facilities are adapted to the species, size, ethological behavior and the category of the animals concerned and to the planned journey; |
Or. en
Amendment 775
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point h
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) the floor area and height of the means of transport and the unloading and loading facilities are adapted to the species, size, category of the animals concerned and to the planned journey; | (h) the floor area and height of the means of transport and the unloading and loading facilities are adapted to the species, size, ethological behaviour and category of the animals concerned and to the planned journey; |
Or. es
Justification
The size or category of an animal cannot be the only key factor in determining the size and density of animals. For example, chickens are natural prey, and their natural behaviour is to huddle together to protect themselves from attack. These species-specific characteristics should also be taken into account to ensure that the cage design provides a high level of animal welfare.
Amendment 776
Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 777
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; | (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at appropriate intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species. |
Or. en
Amendment 778
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; | (i) water, feed and rest are offered to terrestrial animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; this shall not apply to poultry, which must undergo fasting while being transported to the slaughterhouse, in accordance with hygiene rules; |
Or. fr
Justification
For hygiene reasons, poultry should not be fed during transport. This is widely recognised good practice in the sector. Fasting before and during transport is crucial to reduce the risk of faecal contamination from poultry carcasses. It is advisable to withhold feeding for a few hours to ensure that the birds’ intestines are empty. This is vital for keeping contamination in check during transport. Animal fasting is a quality control requirement.
Amendment 779
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; | (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; with the exception of poultry which should undergo a fasting period during transport to the slaughterhouse in order to comply with hygiene regulations; |
Or. en
Justification
Poultry should not be fed during transport for hygienic purposes. Fasting before and during transport is essential to minimize droppings, reduce the risk of fecal contamination of carcasses, and facilitate cleaning and disinfection at slaughterhouses. Furthermore, a feed withdrawal period of 8 to 12 hours is advised to ensure the birds' intestines are empty while preserving their strength, which is vital for effective contamination control during processing.
Amendment 780
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; | (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the terrestrial animal’s species and their physiological needs, with the exception of poultry, for which a fasting period must be observed during transport to slaughter in order to comply with hygiene rules; |
Or. es
Amendment 781
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Emma Wiesner, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; | (i) water, feed and rest are offered, if appropriate, to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity taking into account the animal’s species, their physiological needs, and the sanitary rules; |
Or. en
Amendment 782
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; | (i) water, feed and rest, and where necessary veterinary care, are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; |
Or. en
Amendment 783
Marko Vešligaj
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; | (i) water, feed and rest are offered to terrestrial animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the terrestrial animal’s species and their physiological needs; |
Or. en
Amendment 784
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) water, feed and rest are offered to animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the animal’s species and their physiological needs; | (i) water, feed and rest are offered to terrestrial animals at regular intervals during the journey and are appropriate in quality and quantity to the terrestrial animal’s species and their physiological needs; |
Or. en
Amendment 785
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i a) the journey log shall include a contingency plan with the provisions for the mitigation and appropriate response to emergency situations or other unexpected events that may occur during both long and short journeys. Such provisions should include, but not be limited to, solutions for the emergency housing of animals and the contact details of appropriate expertise that may be available along the route. These provisions should address animal welfare, safety, biosecurity, responsibilities and communication; |
Or. en
Amendment 786
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i a) The means of transport, including feeding systems when equipped in a mode of transport, shall be cleaned and disinfected immediately after every transport of animals or of any product which could affect animal health, and if necessary before any new loading of animals, using disinfectants officially authorised by the competent authority; |
Or. en
Amendment 787
Sander Smit, Jessika Van Leeuwen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) aquatic animals are provided with water in sufficient volume and quality. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 788
Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) aquatic animals are provided with water in sufficient volume and quality. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 789
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) aquatic animals are provided with water in sufficient volume and quality. | (j) aquatic animals are provided with adequate transport conditions, water in sufficient volume and quality, and species-specific temperature and oxygen levels during the entire journey. |
Or. en
Amendment 790
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) aquatic animals are provided with water in sufficient volume and quality. | (j) aquatic animals are provided with water in sufficient volume and quality , and with species appropriate temperature and oxygen levels. |
Or. en
Amendment 791
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) aquatic animals are provided with water in sufficient volume and quality. | (j) aquatic animals are provided with water in sufficient volume and quality, whenever water is necessary for its transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 792
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) aquatic animals are provided with water in sufficient volume and quality. | (j) aquatic animals are provided with water in sufficient volume and good quality. |
Or. en
Amendment 793
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j a) when transport is being carried out at sea by towing holding units, the speed shall be appropriate for the species, life-stage, size, weight and number of animals being transported to avoid crowding and exhaustion. |
Or. en
Amendment 794
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Alexander Bernhuber, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article4a | |
| Development of a slaughterhouse network | |
| 1. Member States shall identify and provide sufficient European and national funds to beneficiaries in order to develop the slaughterhouse network. Member States shall ensure that they will also benefit from all the necessary infrastructure for the development of the slaughterhouse network. | |
| 2. Member States shall take appropriate measures to simplify the authorization procedures for slaughterhouses in general and for mobile slaughterhouses in particular. | |
| 3. Member States also grant tax incentives for the slaughterhouse network for a minimum of 5 years from the entry into force of this Regulation. | |
| 4. The European Commission shall publish by [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation] a roadmap for the development of a European slaughterhouse network. | |
| 5. The European Commission shall identify best practices, European funding possibilities and policy synergies for the development of the slaughterhouse network, and shall assist Member States upon request. The European Commission shall present the main findings to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions without undue delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 795
Philippe Olivier, Valérie Deloge, Julien Leonardelli, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 5 | deleted |
| Application for organiser authorisation for long journeys | |
| 1. Organisers may only make arrangements for the transport of animals for long journeys if they hold an authorisation granted in accordance with Article 6. | |
| 2. The organiser shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V. The application shall specify whether the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries or not. | |
| 3. Organisers shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State. | |
| 4. The application provided for in paragraph 2 shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: | |
| (a) the organiser is established, or, in the case of an organiser established in a third country, is represented, in the Member State of the respective competent authority; | |
| (b) the organiser has the capacity to comply with Article 14. |
Or. fr
Justification
In France, transporters and their employees already possess the requisite qualifications, namely a certificate of competence to transport live animals, which they obtain from an authorised body following a period of training. As such, transporters and attendants are perfectly capable of carrying out their activities, and should not be required to obtain further certifications or authorisations of any kind.
Amendment 796
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Application for organiser authorisation for long journeys | Organiser authorisation for long journeys |
Or. es
Amendment 797
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The organiser shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V. The application shall specify whether the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries or not. | 2. The organiser shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority using the form in Section 1 of Annex V, in accordance with the administrative procedure of the Member State in which the application is made. The application shall specify whether the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries or not. |
| The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for authorisation and record it in TRACES, with the relevant reasons in the case of rejection. |
Or. es
Justification
The administrative procedure must be in accordance with the procedure established in the Member State in which the application is made, and once the authorisation, renewal, suspension or revocation has been processed, it will be registered in TRACES.
Amendment 798
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The organiser shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V. The application shall specify whether the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries or not. | 2. The organiser shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys or short journeys for air transport and export purpose, to the competent authority using the form in Section 1 of Annex V. The application shall specify whether the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries or not . |
Or. en
Amendment 799
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The organiser shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V. The application shall specify whether the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries or not. | 2. The organiser shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V. The application shall specify whether the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries or not. In case the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries, the intended place and countries of destination will be specified in the application. |
Or. en
Amendment 800
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The organiser shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V. The application shall specify whether the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries or not. | 2. The organiser of a cross-border journey shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V. The application shall specify whether the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries or not. For other journeys, national provisions shall apply. |
Or. en
Justification
The compulsory use of the TRACES electronic registration system and all its requirements even for short domestic journeys at this stage seems a disproportionate administrative burden, especially for small local operators. Most slaughterhouses already have digital systems in place that are used for logging journeys, and they would all have to communicate with TRACES directly to make this work. We suggest that if TRACES is to be used for logging journeys, it should be mandatory only for cross-border transport, according the rules of the Animal Health Law.In addition, impact assessment analysis only covers transports between Member States registered in TRACES, thus excluding all intra-national transports of animals.
Amendment 801
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Organisers shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State. | 3. Organisers shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State, in the country of origin of the organiser or the animals to be transported. |
Or. en
Amendment 802
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the organiser has the capacity to comply with Article 14. | (b) the organiser has risk management systems, provides training to staff ensuring continuing compliance with Article 14 and continuing protection of animals from factors that cause suffering. |
Or. el
Amendment 803
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the organiser has the capacity to comply with Article 14. | (b) the organiser has the professional competence and the capacity to comply with Article 14. |
Or. en
Amendment 804
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the organiser has the capacity to comply with Article 14. | (b) the organiser has the the professional competence and capacity to comply with Article 14. |
Or. en
Amendment 805
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the organiser has the capacity to comply with Article 14. | (b) the organiser has the professional competence and capacity to comply with Article 14. |
Or. en
Amendment 806
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the organiser has the capacity to comply with Article 14. | (b) the organiser has the professional competence and capacity to comply with Article 14. |
Or. en
Amendment 807
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) neither the organiser nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed a serious infringement as provided for in Article 44 in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. | |
| For the purposes of point (ba), if the organiser or their representatives committed a serious infringement during that period, they shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that they have taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. |
Or. en
Justification
Ensures equivalent requirements for transporters in article 7
Amendment 808
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) the organisers have no record of serious infringements of EU legislation and/or national legislation on the protection of animals in the five years preceding the date of the application. This provision shall not apply where the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Competent Authority that it has taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. |
Or. en
Amendment 809
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) the organiser has no record of serious infringements of EU legislation and/or national legislation on the protection of animals in the five years preceding the date of the application. |
Or. en
Amendment 810
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) the organiser has no record of infringements of EU legislation and/or national legislation on the protection of animals preceding the date of the application. |
Or. en
Amendment 811
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The competent authority shall grant the authorisation referred to in Article 5 in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V, provided that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met. | 1. The competent authority shall grant the authorisation referred to in Article 5 using the form in Section 1 of Annex V, provided that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met. |
Or. en
Amendment 812
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The competent authority shall grant the authorisation referred to in Article5 in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V, provided that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met. | 1. The competent authority shall grant the authorisation referred to in Article 5 and record it in TRACES using the form in Section 1 of Annex V, provided that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met. |
Or. es
Justification
The administrative procedure must be in accordance with the procedure established in the Member State in which the application is made, and once the authorisation, renewal, suspension or revocation has been processed, it will be registered in TRACES.
Amendment 813
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation provided for in paragraph 1 shall specify the species and categories of animals and the type(s) of transport covered and whether it covers the transport of animals to third countries or not. | The authorisation provided for in paragraph 1 shall specify the species and categories of animals and the type(s) of transport covered and whether it covers the transport of animals to third countries or not. In case the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries, the intended place and countries of destination will be specified in the application. |
Or. en
Amendment 814
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 18 months from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 815
Milan Mazurek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of issue. |
Or. sk
Amendment 816
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 817
Philippe Olivier, Valérie Deloge, Julien Leonardelli, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of issue. |
Or. fr
Justification
In order to alleviate the administrative burden in an area with a clearly established and recognised remit of operations, the validity of the authorisation period for organisers should be increased to 10 years.
Amendment 818
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 2 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 819
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 7 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 820
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 7 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 821
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. | 3. At least two months before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. |
Or. en
Amendment 822
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for the rejection. | 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for the rejection. |
Or. es
Justification
The administrative procedure must be in accordance with the procedure established in the Member State in which the application is made, and once the authorisation, renewal, suspension or revocation has been processed, it will be registered in TRACES.
Amendment 823
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. | 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 in case the organiser intends to organise the transport of animals to third countries, documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. |
Or. en
Amendment 824
Milan Mazurek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. | 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. Beneficiaries have the right to have the refusal reviewed by an independent authority of the Member State. |
Or. sk
Amendment 825
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. | 3. At least one month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. |
Or. en
Amendment 826
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. | 3. At least one month before the expiry of the authorisation, the organiser may apply for a renewal in TRACES. An application for renewal shall include evidence that the conditions set out in Article 5(4) are met, the certificate provided for in Article 33 when relevant, and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for it. |
Or. en
Amendment 827
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the organiser no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 5(4) or in Article 33(6), the competent authority shall order the suspension of the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall record the suspension in TRACES without delay. Where relevant, the competent authority shall suspend the part of the authorisation covering transport to a third country. | If the organiser no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 5(4) or in Article 33(6), the competent authority shall order the suspension of the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall record the suspension in TRACES without delay. The competent authority shall also suspend the part of the authorisation covering intended transport to a third country. |
Or. en
Amendment 828
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the organiser no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 5(4) or in Article 33(6), the competent authority shall order the suspension of the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall record the suspension in TRACES without delay. Where relevant, the competent authority shall suspend the part of the authorisation covering transport to a third country. | If the organiser no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 5(4) or in Article 33(6), the competent authority shall order the suspension of the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall record the suspension without delay. Where relevant, the competent authority shall suspend the part of the authorisation covering transport to a third country. |
Or. en
Amendment 829
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall lift the suspension if the organiser provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their application is based. | The competent authority may considering lifting the suspension if the organiser provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their application is based. |
Or. en
Amendment 830
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport within the Union, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 831
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport within the Union, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 832
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport within the Union, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | For transport both within the Union and to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation without delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 833
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport within the Union, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | For transport within the Union and to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. |
Or. en
Amendment 834
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport within the Union, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | For transport within the Union, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies in a reasonable time of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. |
Or. en
Amendment 835
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport within the Union, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | For transport within the Union, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within six months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. |
Or. ro
Amendment 836
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within three months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 837
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within three months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 838
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within three months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 839
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within three months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 840
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within three months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 841
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within three months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | For transport to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within a reasonable time, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. |
Or. en
Amendment 842
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For transport to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within three months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | For transport to a third country, if the organiser has not corrected the deficiencies within six months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. |
Or. ro
Amendment 843
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. For transport within the same Member State, national rules on transport authorisations shall apply and the use of TRACES shall not be mandatory. |
Or. en
Justification
The compulsory use of the TRACES electronic registration system and all its requirements even for short domestic journeys at this stage seems a disproportionate administrative burden, especially for small local operators. Most slaughterhouses already have digital systems in place that are used for logging journeys, and they would all have to communicate with TRACES directly to make this work. We suggest that if TRACES is to be used for logging journeys, it should be mandatory only for cross-border transport, according the rules of the Animal Health Law.
Amendment 844
Philippe Olivier, Valérie Deloge, Julien Leonardelli, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 7 | deleted |
| Application for transporter authorisation for short journeys | |
| 1. Transporters may only transport animals for short journeys if they hold: | |
| (a) an authorisation for short journeys granted in accordance with Article 9(1) for the species and categories concerned; or | |
| (b) an authorisation for long journeys granted in accordance with Article 9(1) for the species and categories concerned. | |
| 2. | |
| The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals on short journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 2 of Annex V. The application shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: | |
| (a) the transporter is established, or, in the case of a transporter established in a third country, is represented, in the Member State of the respective competent authority; | |
| (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate staff and equipment and has written instructions for staff as regards watering, feeding and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; | |
| (c) the drivers and attendants employed by or providing services to the transporter have followed the relevant training courses and have certificates of competence as provided for in Article 38; | |
| (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed a serious infringement as provided for in Article 44 in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. | |
| For the purposes of point (d), if the transporter or their representatives committed a serious infringement during that period, they shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that they have taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. |
Or. fr
Justification
As with Article 5(1), (2), (3) and (4), in France, transporters and their employees already possess the requisite qualifications, namely a certificate of competence to transport live animals, which they obtain from an authorised body following a period of training. As such, transporters and attendants are perfectly capable of carrying out their activities, and should not be required to obtain further certifications or authorisations of any kind.
Amendment 845
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1 a. Operators who occasionally transport aquatic animals for subsequent sale to the final consumer on their premises, as an accessory to their main economic activity, shall be exempt from applying for the authorisations referred to in paragraph 1. |
Or. en
Amendment 846
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1 b. This Article shall not apply to the transport of dogs and cats within the European Union. |
Or. en
Amendment 847
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals on short journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 2 of Annex V. The application shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: | deleted |
| (a) the transporter is established, or, in the case of a transporter established in a third country, is represented, in the Member State of the respective competent authority; | |
| (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate staff and equipment and has written instructions for staff as regards watering, feeding and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; | |
| (c) the drivers and attendants employed by or providing services to the transporter have followed the relevant training courses and have certificates of competence as provided for in Article 38; | |
| (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed a serious infringement as provided for in Article 44 in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. | |
| For the purposes of point (d), if the transporter or their representatives committed a serious infringement during that period, they shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that they have taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. |
Or. en
Amendment 848
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals on short journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 2 of Annex V. The application shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: | deleted |
| (a) the transporter is established, or, in the case of a transporter established in a third country, is represented, in the Member State of the respective competent authority; | |
| (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate staff and equipment and has written instructions for staff as regards watering, feeding and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; | |
| (c) the drivers and attendants employed by or providing services to the transporter have followed the relevant training courses and have certificates of competence as provided for in Article 38; | |
| (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed a serious infringement as provided for in Article 44 in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. | |
| For the purposes of point (d), if the transporter or their representatives committed a serious infringement during that period, they shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that they have taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. |
Or. en
Amendment 849
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals on short journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 2 of Annex V. The application shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: | The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals on short journeys to the competent authority using the form in Section 2 of Annex V. The application shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: |
Or. es
Justification
The administrative procedure must be in accordance with the procedure established in the Member State in which the application is made, and once the authorisation, renewal, suspension or revocation has been processed, it will be registered in TRACES.
Amendment 850
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals on short journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 2 of Annex V. The application shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: | The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals on short journeys to the competent authority using the form in Section 2 of Annex V. The application shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: |
Or. en
Justification
The transporter is (according to current legislation) already required to provide proof of their qualifications for animal transport and apply for authorization as a transport company with the competent authority. This well-established system should be maintained as it is. Furthermore, not all farmers have digital skills, and the current TRACES system is too complex and would need to be simplified.
Amendment 851
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals on short journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 2 of Annex V. The application shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: | The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals on short journeys to the competent authority using the form in Section 2 of Annex V. The application shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: |
Or. en
Amendment 852
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate staff and equipment and has written instructions for staff as regards watering, feeding and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; | (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate staff and equipment and has written instructions for staff in order to ensure compliance with this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 853
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate staff and equipment and has written instructions for staff as regards watering, feeding and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; | (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate staff and equipment and has written instructions for staff, who are inspected annually by the competent authority, as regards watering, feeding and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; |
Or. el
Amendment 854
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate staff and equipment and has written instructions for staff as regards watering, feeding and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; | (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate educated staff and approved equipment and has written species specific instructions for staff as regards watering, feeding, temperature and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 855
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriate staff and equipment and has written instructions for staff as regards watering, feeding and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; | (b) the transporter has sufficient and appropriately trained staff and sufficient and appropriate equipment and has written instructions for staff as regards watering, feeding and care of animals and operational procedures in place to enable its staff to comply with this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 856
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the drivers and attendants employed by or providing services to the transporter have followed the relevant training courses and have certificates of competence as provided for in Article 38; | (c) the drivers and qualified animal technicians employed by or providing services to the transporter have followed the relevant training courses and have certificates of competence as provided for in Article 38; |
Or. en
Amendment 857
Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the drivers and attendants employed by or providing services to the transporter have followed the relevant training courses and have certificates of competence as provided for in Article 38; | (c) the drivers as qualified animal technicians employed by or providing services to the transporter have followed the relevant training courses and have certificates of competence as provided for in Article 38; |
Or. en
Justification
This gives greater clarity that the driver is qualified driver.
Amendment 858
Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed a serious infringement as provided for in Article 44 in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 859
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed a serious infringement as provided for in Article 44 in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. | (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed an infringement as provided for in Article 44 at any time preceding the date of the application. |
Or. en
Amendment 860
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed a serious infringement as provided for in Article 44 in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. | (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed a serious infringement as provided for in Article 44 in the 1 year preceding the date of the application. |
Or. en
Amendment 861
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State where the application is submitted have committed a serious infringement as provided for in Article 44 in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. | (d) neither the transporter nor their representatives submiting the application have committed a serious infringement in any Member State as provided for in Article 44 in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. |
Or. en
Amendment 862
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d a) neither the transporter nor their representatives in the Member State, or the drivers and attendants employed by or providing services to the transporter who is submiting the application have criminal records regarding any kind of animal welfare infringements in the 5 years preceding the date of the application. |
Or. en
Amendment 863
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d a) the transporter holds a contingency plan in the event of emergencies during the intended transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 864
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d a) a contingency plan in the event of emergencies during the intended transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 865
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d a) contingency plan in the event of emergencies during the intended transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 866
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d b) the transporter has a contingency plan in the event of emergencies during the intended transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 867
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a contingency plan for the event of emergencies during the transport that addresses in particular accidents, emergency killings and, where relevant, emergencies at the borders of third countries; |
Or. en
Amendment 868
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For the purposes of point (d), if the transporter or their representatives committed a serious infringement during that period, they shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that they have taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 869
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For the purposes of point (d), if the transporter or their representatives committed a serious infringement during that period, they shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that they have taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. | For the purposes of point (d), if the transporter or their representatives committed an infringement during that period, they shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that they have taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. |
Or. en
Amendment 870
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For the purposes of point (d), if the transporter or their representatives committed a serious infringement during that period, they shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that they have taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. | For the purposes of point (d), if the transporter or their representatives committed a serious infringement during that period, they shall demonstrate adequately, at the request of the competent authority, that they have taken all necessary measures to avoid further infringements. |
Or. ro
Amendment 871
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| In order to ensure the uniform presentation of contingency plans in the event of emergencies during short journeys provided for in point (e), the Commission shall, by the entry into force of this Regulation, adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 49 to lay down minimum requirements for the content of the contingency plan, for different types of journeys, and establish and update as necessary standard model forms for the submission of those contingency plans. |
Or. en
Amendment 872
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| In order to ensure the uniform presentation of contingency plans in the event of emergencies during short journeys provided for in paragraph (e), the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 49 to lay down minimum requirements for the content of the contingency plan, for different types of journeys, and establish and update as necessary standard model forms for the submission of those contingency plans. |
Or. en
Amendment 873
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| No transporter, including any natural or legal person who has subcontracted the transport of animals for the whole journey or a part of the journey to at least one other transporter, shall act as a transporter unless they hold an authorisation issued by a competent authority as defined in Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625. |
Or. en
Amendment 874
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2 a. In order to ensure the uniform presentation of contingency plans in the event of emergencies during short journeys provided for in paragraph (e new), point (ii), the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 49 to lay down minimum requirements for the content of the contingency plan, for different types of journeys, and establish and update as necessary standard model forms for the submission of those contingency plans. |
Or. en
Justification
this mimics requirements for contingency plans under article 8 for long journeys, that should also be applicable to planned short journeys.
Amendment 875
Philippe Olivier, Valérie Deloge, Julien Leonardelli, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 8 | deleted |
| Application for transporter authorisation for long journeys | |
| 1. Transporters may only transport animals for long journeys if they hold an authorisation granted in accordance with Article 9(1). Such authorisations shall also be valid for short journeys. | |
| 2. The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 3 of Annex V. Transporters shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State. | |
| 3. The application provided for in paragraph 2 shall contain evidence that the following conditions are met: | |
| (a) the transporter complies with the conditions set out in Article 7(2); and | |
| (b) the transporter holds the following documents: | |
| i. valid certificates of approval as provided for in Articles 12 or 13 for the means of transport to be used by the transporter for the long journey concerned; | |
| ii. a document setting out in detail the procedures enabling the transporter to trace and record the movements of vehicles and vessels under their responsibility, and the procedures to contact the drivers concerned at any time during long journeys; | |
| iii. a contingency plan in the event of emergencies during the intended transport. | |
| 4. In order to ensure the uniform presentation of contingency plans in the event of emergencies during long journeys provided for in paragraph (b), point (iii), the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 49 to lay down minimum requirements for the content of the contingency plan, for different types of journeys, and establish and update as necessary standard model forms for the submission of those contingency plans. |
Or. fr
Justification
As with Articles 5 and 7, in France, transporters and their employees already possess the requisite qualifications, namely a certificate of competence to transport live animals, which they obtain from an authorised body following a period of training. As such, transporters and attendants are perfectly capable of carrying out their activities, and should not be required to obtain further certifications or authorisations of any kind.
Amendment 876
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 3 of Annex V. Transporters shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State. | 2. The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority using the form in Section 3 of Annex V, in accordance with the administrative procedure of the Member State in which the application is made. Transporters shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State. |
Or. es
Justification
The administrative procedure must be in accordance with the procedure established in the Member State in which the application is made, and once the authorisation, renewal, suspension or revocation has been processed, it will be registered in TRACES.
Amendment 877
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 3 of Annex V. Transporters shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State. | 2. The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority using the form in Section 3 of Annex V. Transporters shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State. |
Or. en
Amendment 878
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 3 of Annex V. Transporters shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State. | 2. The transporter shall submit an application for an authorisation to transport animals for long journeys to the competent authority in TRACES using the form in Section 3 of Annex V. Transporters shall apply for an authorisation to no more than one competent authority, in no more than one Member State, in the country of origin of the transporter or the animals to be transported. |
Or. en
Amendment 879
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| ii. a document setting out in detail the procedures enabling the transporter to trace and record the movements of vehicles and vessels under their responsibility, and the procedures to contact the drivers concerned at any time during long journeys; | ii. a document setting out in detail the procedures enabling the transporter to trace and record the movements of vehicles and vessels under their responsibility, and the procedures to contact the drivers concerned at any time during long journeys; the document shall also include the technical means used to ensure animal welfare throughout the duration of the journey; |
Or. el
Amendment 880
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| ii. a document setting out in detail the procedures enabling the transporter to trace and record the movements of vehicles and vessels under their responsibility, and the procedures to contact the drivers concerned at any time during long journeys; | ii. a document setting out in detail the procedures enabling the transporter to trace and record the movements of vehicles and vessels under their responsibility, and the procedures to contact the drivers and the competent authority for animal welfare concerned at any time during long journeys; |
Or. en
Amendment 881
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| iii. a contingency plan in the event of emergencies during the intended transport. | iii. a contingency plan in the event of emergencies during the intended transport, which shall include alternative routes, stops for temporarily holding animals and instructions for urgent care in the event of injury or heat stress. |
Or. el
Amendment 882
Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. In order to ensure the uniform presentation of contingency plans in the event of emergencies during long journeys provided for in paragraph (b), point (iii), the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 49 to lay down minimum requirements for the content of the contingency plan, for different types of journeys, and establish and update as necessary standard model forms for the submission of those contingency plans. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 883
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. In order to ensure the uniform presentation of contingency plans in the event of emergencies during long journeys provided for in paragraph (b), point (iii), the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 49 to lay down minimum requirements for the content of the contingency plan, for different types of journeys, and establish and update as necessary standard model forms for the submission of those contingency plans. | 4. In order to ensure the uniform presentation of contingency plans in the event of emergencies during long journeys provided for in paragraph (b), point (iii), the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 48 to lay down minimum requirements for the content of the contingency plan, for different types of journeys, and establish and update as necessary standard model forms for the submission of those contingency plans. |
Or. en
Amendment 884
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. In order to ensure the uniform presentation of contingency plans in the event of emergencies during long journeys provided for in paragraph (b), point (iii), the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 49 to lay down minimum requirements for the content of the contingency plan, for different types of journeys, and establish and update as necessary standard model forms for the submission of those contingency plans. | 4. In order to ensure the uniform presentation of contingency plans in the event of emergencies during long journeys provided for in paragraph (b), point (iii), the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 49 to lay down minimum requirements for the content of the contingency plan, for different types of journeys, and establish and update as necessary standard model forms for the submission of those contingency plans. The standard model forms must include a route chart with programmed staging points and animal care points, and the estimated duration of each leg of the journey. |
Or. el
Amendment 885
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. The organiser shall be responsible for the development of the contingency plan to ensure a timely and effective response to emergency situations and other unexpected events that may occur during the journey. The organiser shall seek advice from official, independent veterinarians, veterinary paraprofessionals or other relevant advisors with species-relevant experience and expertise to develop the plan. The organiser shall ensure that the plan is available to personnel directly responsible for the transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 886
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 b. The plan should focus on preserving animal health and welfare from the loading of the animals at the place of departure to the unloading at the place of destination, and may cover: evidence of a listed disease or a disease included in the transit or importing country requirements in a consignment of imported or transiting animals at a border inspection post or quarantine centre; veterinary emergency in animals; escape of animals; natural disasters and interruption of critical services threatening the transport operation; doubts about the legality of the animal consignment. |
Or. en
Amendment 887
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 c. The plan should address the following: communication, biosecurity, health and safety, and animal welfare in each instance. In particular the establishment of a chain of command to ensure a rapid and effective decision–making process; the addressing of concerns such as deviation from the journey plan, failure to reach the transit or importing country, rejection of the consignment by them or lengthy delays at exit points, including contact details of appropriate emergency housing and veterinary and other appropriate expertise that may be available along the route; the inclusion of procedures for managing transported animals that fail to reach the designated transit or importing countries or are rejected by them, or in instances when the consignment does not comply with the transit or importing country’s requirements; the identification of responsibilities for development and communication of alternative transport arrangements when necessary, including a biosecurity plan with effective measures to ensure awareness, prevention, surveillance, control and eradication of animal diseases aligned with requirements and provisions under Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council (the 'Animal Health Law'), with all due regard for the welfare of animals; and the inclusion of clear instructions on the protection of animals at the time of killing, should animals be euthanized during the journey for humane purposes, to avoid the unnecessary suffering of animals, prevent threats to human or animal life, and ensure that Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 and its future revised versions are fully complied with. |
Or. en
Amendment 888
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The competent authority shall grant an authorisation to a transporter for short or long journeys as required under Article 7(1) and Article 8(1) in TRACES using the forms in Sections 2 and 3 of Annex V respectively, provided the conditions set out in Article 7(2) and Article 8(2) respectively are met. | 1. The competent authority shall grant an authorisation to a transporter within the same Member State on the basis of national rules and to a cross-border transport as required under Article 7(1) and Article 8(1) in TRACES using the forms in Sections 2 and 3 of Annex V respectively, provided the conditions set out in Article 7(2) and Article 8(2) respectively are met. |
Or. en
Justification
The compulsory use of the TRACES electronic registration system and all its requirements even for short domestic journeys at this stage seems a disproportionate administrative burden, especially for small local operators. Most slaughterhouses already have digital systems in place that are used for logging journeys, and they would all have to communicate with TRACES directly to make this work. We suggest that if TRACES is to be used for logging journeys, it should be mandatory only for cross-border transport, according the rules of the Animal Health Law.
Amendment 889
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The competent authority shall grant an authorisation to a transporter for short or long journeys as required under Article 7(1) and Article 8(1) in TRACES using the forms in Sections 2 and 3 of Annex respectively, provided the conditions set out in Article 7(2) and Article 8(2) respectively are met. | 1. The competent authority shall grant an authorisation to a transporter for short or long journeys as required under Article 7(1) and Article 8(1) using the forms in Sections 2 and 3 of Annex V respectively, provided the conditions set out in Article 7(2) and Article 8(2) respectively are met. |
Or. es
Justification
The administrative procedure must be in accordance with the procedure established in the Member State in which the application is made, and once the authorisation, renewal, suspension or revocation has been processed, it will be registered in TRACES.
Amendment 890
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 18 months from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 891
Milan Mazurek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of issue. |
Or. sk
Amendment 892
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 893
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 7 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 894
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 7 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 895
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The authorisation shall be valid for a period of not more than 3 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 896
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation for short or long journeys, the transporter may apply for the renewal of the authorisation in TRACES. An application for renewal shall contain the documents required under Article 7(2) or Article 8(2) and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). | 3. One month before the expiry of the authorisation for short or long journeys, the transporter may apply for the renewal of the authorisation. An application for renewal shall contain the documents required under Article 7(2) or Article 8(2) and documented analysis of monitoring of indicators for the period of validity of the previous approval and where appropriate, documented evidence of measures put in place if values quantifying the indicators exceed the thresholds provided for in Article 26(3). |
Or. es
Justification
The administrative procedure must be in accordance with the procedure established in the Member State in which the application is made, and once the authorisation, renewal, suspension or revocation has been processed, it will be registered in TRACES.
Amendment 897
Maria Grapini
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4.The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for the rejection. | 4.The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for the rejection explicitly, specifying the piece of legislation that was not complied with. |
Or. ro
Amendment 898
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES and, in case of rejection, the reasons for the rejection. | 4. The competent authority shall grant or reject the application for a renewal and record the renewal or rejection in TRACES or relevant national system and, in case of rejection, the reasons for the rejection. |
Or. en
Justification
The compulsory use of the TRACES electronic registration system and all its requirements even for short domestic journeys at this stage seems a disproportionate administrative burden, especially for small local operators. Most slaughterhouses already have digital systems in place that are used for logging journeys, and they would all have to communicate with TRACES directly to make this work. We suggest that if TRACES is to be used for logging journeys, it should be mandatory only for cross-border transport, according the rules of the Animal Health Law.
Amendment 899
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 7(2) or Article 8(2), the competent authority shall order the suspension of the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall record the suspension in TRACES without delay. | If the transporter no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 7(2) or Article 8(2), the competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement indicating the reasons suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. The transporter should provide evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies within one month of receipt of the written statement. The competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625, if the transporter cannot correct the deficiencies within the stated delay and should record the withdrawal in TRACES without undue delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 900
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 7(2) or Article 8(2), the competent authority shall order the suspension of the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall record the suspension in TRACES without delay. | If the transporter no longer meets the conditions set out in Article 7(2) or Article 8(2) of this Regulation, the competent authority shall issue a written declaration detailing the deficiencies and recommendations for corrective action. The transporter shall provide a proof of compliance within one month of receiving the declaration. If the deficiencies are not resolved within that period, the competent authority shall suspend the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and record the suspension in TRACES without delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 901
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 7(2) or Article 8(2), the competent authority shall order the suspension of the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall record the suspension in TRACES without delay. | If the transporter no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 7(2) or Article 8(2), the competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement indicating the reasons for the suspsension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. |
| The competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625, if the transporter cannot correct the deficiencies within the stated delay and should record the withdrawal in TRACES without delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 902
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 7(2) or Article 8(2), the competent authority shall order the suspension of the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall record the suspension in TRACES without delay. | If the transporter no longer meets the conditions provided for in Article 7(2) or Article 8(2), the competent authority shall immediately order the suspension of the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall record the suspension in TRACES without delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 903
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement indicating the reasons for the suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 904
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall lift the suspension when the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their application is based. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 905
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall lift the suspension when the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their application is based. | The competent authority may only once consider lifting the suspension when the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their application is based, to avoid repeated deficiencies. |
Or. en
Amendment 906
Maria Grapini
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall lift the suspension when the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their application is based. | The competent authority shall lift the suspension immediately when the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their application is based. |
Or. ro
Amendment 907
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 908
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation. | If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation, without delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 909
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Training of drivers, attendants and animal welfare officers | Training of drivers, qualified animal technicians and animal welfare officers |
Or. en
Amendment 910
Philippe Olivier, Valérie Deloge, Julien Leonardelli, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. | deleted |
Or. fr
Justification
In France, transporters and their employees already possess the requisite qualifications, namely a certificate of competence to transport live animals, which they obtain from an authorised body following a period of training. As such, transporters are attendants are perfectly capable of carrying out their activities, and should not be required to obtain further certifications or authorisations of any kind. This also runs the risk of duplicating existing national legislation.
Amendment 911
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. | The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. |
| Nevertheless, professionals who can prove a minimum of five years of experience in the transport and handling of animals of the same category, or those who hold a valid animal welfare certification in a Member State, shall be exempt from the obligation to undergo such training. The certification shall remain valid until its expiry date without the need for early renewal. | |
| Training may also be provided by sectoral organisations, provided that adequate training of personnel is ensured and that the standards established in the applicable legislation are met. |
Or. en
Amendment 912
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. | The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1), point (b). Such training courses shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. Experienced drivers and attendants with at least 5 years of verifiable experience in live animal transport may undergo a shortened refresher training courses instead of the full program. Training may also be conducted in a hybrid format, allowing a portion to be completed online to reduce logistical and financial burdens on transporters and drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers. |
Or. en
Amendment 913
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. | Training of drivers, attendants, animal welfare officers, livestock vessel handling staff, personnel handling animals at assembly centres, airport and port facilities. The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, and livestock vessel handling staff, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. |
Or. en
Amendment 914
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. | The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, animal welfare officers and official veterinarians referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. The drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers shall undertake refresher training every 3 years. |
Or. en
Amendment 915
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. | The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used and shall be repeated at least every three years. Successful completion of the training shall be documented by a refresher training certificate. |
Or. el
Amendment 916
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. | The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. The drivers, attendants and animal welfare officers shall also undertake refresher training every 2 years. |
Or. en
Amendment 917
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The transporter shall arrange for drivers, attendants, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. | The transporter shall arrange for drivers, qualified animal technicians, and the animal welfare officers referred to in Article 21, to follow one of the approved animal welfare training courses referred to in Article 37(1)(b). Such training shall be relevant to their tasks, the species, the categories of animals they handle, and the means of transport used. |
Or. en
Amendment 918
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals by road or by rail for a long journey unless the means of transport has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 12. | 1. No person shall transport animals by road or by rail for a short or long journey unless the means of transport has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 12. |
Or. en
Amendment 919
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals by road or by rail for a long journey unless the means of transport has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 12. | 1. No person shall transport animals by road or by rail unless the means of transport has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 12. |
Or. en
Amendment 920
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. No person shall transport animals by road or by rail for a long journey unless the means of transport has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 12. | 1. No person shall transport animals by road or by rail unless the means of transport has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 12. |
Or. en
Amendment 921
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. No person shall transport animals by livestock vessel for more than 10 nautical miles from a Union port unless the livestock vessel has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 13. | 2. No person shall transport animals by livestock vessel from a Union port unless the livestock vessel has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 13. |
Or. en
Amendment 922
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. No person shall transport animals by livestock vessel for more than 10 nautical miles from a Union port unless the livestock vessel has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 13. | 2. No person shall transport animals by livestock vessel from a Union port unless the livestock vessel has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 13. |
Or. en
Amendment 923
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply to containers used in transport by road, rail or by container vessel of terrestrial animals other than domestic birds and rabbits. | 3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply to containers used in transport by road, rail or by container vessel of terrestrial animals other than domestic birds, rabbits and game birds. |
Or. es
Amendment 924
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply to containers used in transport by road, rail or by container vessel of terrestrial animals other than domestic birds and rabbits. | 3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply to containers used in transport by road, rail or by container vessel of terrestrial animals other than domestic birds, rabbits, dogs, cats, and domestic ferrets. |
Or. en
Amendment 925
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply to containers used in transport by road, rail or by container vessel of terrestrial animals other than domestic birds and rabbits. | 3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply to containers used in transport by road, rail or by container vessel of terrestrial animals other than domestic birds, rabbits or game bird species. |
Or. en
Amendment 926
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Animals may only be transported by aircrafts belonging to carriers that are members of the International Air Transport Association. | 4. Animals may only be transported by aircrafts belonging to carriers that are members of the International Air Transport Association. |
| The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 48 specifying the rules around the transport of live animals by air. | |
| These must be compliant with the IATA Live Animals Regulations. In the meantime, the transport of live animals by air should continue to be carried out in line with the technical rules set out in the IATA LAR. |
Or. en
Amendment 927
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Animals may only be transported by aircrafts belonging to carriers that are members of the International Air Transport Association. | 4. Animals may only be transported by aircrafts belonging to carriers that are members of the International Air Transport Association and when the means of transport has been inspected and approved in accordance with Article 13a (new). From the date of entry into force and application of this Regulation, in accordance with Article 59, animals may no longer be transported by aircrafts. |
Or. en
Amendment 928
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Animals may only be transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel if the requirements set out in point 3 of Chapter II of Annex 1 are met. | 5. Animals may only be transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel if the requirements set out in point 3 of Chapter II of Annex 1 are met. From the date of entry into force and application of this Regulation, in accordance with Article 59, animals will no longer be transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel or any other type of vessel. |
Or. en
Amendment 929
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5 a. All means of transport should be equipped with species-relevant first aid kits. |
Or. en
Amendment 930
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5 a. Means of transports should be equipped with species-relevant first aid kits. |
Or. en
Amendment 931
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail for long journeys or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V. | 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail for long journeys or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V or according to the national provisions. |
Or. en
Justification
The compulsory use of the TRACES electronic registration system and all its requirements even for short domestic journeys at this stage seems a disproportionate administrative burden, especially for small local operators. Most slaughterhouses already have digital systems in place that are used for logging journeys, and they would all have to communicate with TRACES directly to make this work. We suggest that if TRACES is to be used for logging journeys, it should be mandatory only for cross-border transport, according the rules of the Animal Health Law.
Amendment 932
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail for long journeys or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V. | 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail for long journeys or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V. |
Or. es
Justification
The administrative procedure must be in accordance with the procedure established in the Member State in which the application is made, and once the authorisation, renewal, suspension or revocation has been processed, it will be registered in TRACES.
Amendment 933
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail for long journeys or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V. | 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V. |
Or. en
Amendment 934
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail for long journeys or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V. | 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V. |
Or. en
Amendment 935
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail for long journeys or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V. | 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a means of transport of animals by road or rail or of containers for large animals, to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V. |
Or. en
Amendment 936
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The competent authority shall grant a certificate of approval of the means of transport to the transporter in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V, provided it complies with the following conditions: | 2. The competent authority shall grant a certificate of approval of the means of transport to the transporter in TRACES using the form set out in Section 5 of Annex V or according to the national provisions, provided it complies with the following conditions: |
Or. en
Justification
The compulsory use of the TRACES electronic registration system and all its requirements even for short domestic journeys at this stage seems a disproportionate administrative burden, especially for small local operators. Most slaughterhouses already have digital systems in place that are used for logging journeys, and they would all have to communicate with TRACES directly to make this work. We suggest that if TRACES is to be used for logging journeys, it should be mandatory only for cross-border transport, according the rules of the Animal Health Law.
Amendment 937
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall record any rejection of an application for a certificate of approval in TRACES and the reasons for its decision. | The competent authority shall record any rejection of an application for a certificate of approval in TRACES and provide the reasons for its decision within 48 hours. |
Or. en
Amendment 938
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall record any rejection of an application for a certificate of approval in TRACES and the reasons for its decision. | The competent authority shall record any rejection of an application for a certificate of approval in TRACES without delay and specify the reasons for its decision. |
Or. en
Amendment 939
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall record any rejection of an application for a certificate of approval in TRACES and the reasons for its decision. | The competent authority shall record any rejection of an application for a certificate of approval in TRACES and the reasons for its decision, within 48 hours. |
Or. en
Amendment 940
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 18 months from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 941
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 3 years from the date of issue. The Competent authority shall perform at least two ad-hoc in-use inspections of the means of transport to check on compliance with paragraph 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 942
Milan Mazurek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of issue. |
Or. sk
Amendment 943
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 7 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 944
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 7 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 945
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. |
| Applications for authorisation or renewal shall be submitted in accordance with the administrative procedure of the Member State where the application is made and shall be registered in TRACES once the procedure has been completed. |
Or. es
Justification
The administrative procedure must be in accordance with the procedure established in the Member State in which the application is made, and once the authorisation, renewal, suspension or revocation has been processed, it will be registered in TRACES.
Amendment 946
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2 or according to the national provisions. |
Or. en
Justification
The compulsory use of the TRACES electronic registration system and all its requirements even for short domestic journeys at this stage seems a disproportionate administrative burden, especially for small local operators. Most slaughterhouses already have digital systems in place that are used for logging journeys, and they would all have to communicate with TRACES directly to make this work. We suggest that if TRACES is to be used for logging journeys, it should be mandatory only for cross-border transport, according the rules of the Animal Health Law.
Amendment 947
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | 4. At least one month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 948
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | 4. At least one month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 949
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | 4. At least one month before the expiry of the certificate of approval provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 950
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The transporter shall notify the competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the means of transport that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment. | 5. The transporter shall notify the competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the means of transport that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment and shall suspend the use of the means of transport until it has been inspected and approved once again by the competent authority, if the damage affects vital welfare parameters (ventilation, insulation, feeding or watering). |
Or. el
Amendment 951
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If a means of transport no longer meets the conditions provided for in paragraph 2, the competent authority shall order the suspension of the certificate in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and record the suspension in TRACES. | If a means of transport no longer meets the conditions provided for in paragraph 2, the competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement indicating the reasons suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. The transporter should provide evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies within one month of receipt of the written statement. The competent authority shall withdraw the authorisation in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625, if the transporter cannot correct the deficiencies within the stated delay and should record the withdrawal in TRACES without undue delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 952
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If a means of transport no longer meets the conditions provided for in paragraph 2, the competent authority shall order the suspension of the certificate in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and record the suspension in TRACES. | If a means of transport no longer meets the conditions provided for in paragraph 2, the competent authority shall order the suspension of the certificate in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and record the suspension in TRACES or in relevant national register. |
Or. en
Justification
The compulsory use of the TRACES electronic registration system and all its requirements even for short domestic journeys at this stage seems a disproportionate administrative burden, especially for small local operators. Most slaughterhouses already have digital systems in place that are used for logging journeys, and they would all have to communicate with TRACES directly to make this work. We suggest that if TRACES is to be used for logging journeys, it should be mandatory only for cross-border transport, according the rules of the Animal Health Law.
Amendment 953
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If a means of transport no longer meets the conditions provided for in paragraph 2, the competent authority shall order the suspension of the certificate in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and record the suspension in TRACES. | If a means of transport no longer meets the conditions provided for in paragraph 2, the competent authority shall order the suspension of the certificate in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and record the suspension in TRACES, without delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 954
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement indicating the reasons for the suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 955
Maria Grapini
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement indicating the reasons for the suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. | The competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement explicitly mentioning the pieces of legislation that they have infringed, indicating the reasons for the suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. |
Or. ro
Amendment 956
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall lift the suspension if the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their certificate is based. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 957
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall lift the suspension if the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their certificate is based. | The competent authority may consider lifting the suspension if the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their certificate is based. |
Or. en
Amendment 958
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within 1 month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 959
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within 1 month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 960
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within 1 month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within 1 month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate, without delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 961
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within six months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. |
Or. ro
Amendment 962
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a livestock vessel for the transport of animals to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 6 of Annex V. The application shall include the following documents: | 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a livestock vessel for the transport of animals to the competent authority using the form set out in Section 6 of Annex V. The application shall include the following documents: |
Or. es
Amendment 963
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a livestock vessel for the transport of animals to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 6 of Annex V. The application shall include the following documents: | 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a livestock vessel for the transport of animals to the European Maritime Safety Agency and for information purposes to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 6 of Annex V. The European Maritime Safety Agency shall be responsible for approvals. The application shall include the following documents: |
Or. en
Justification
Having a centralised agency will better ensure transparency, ensure a more harmonized approach, and achieve a level playing field across Europe and economies of scale will be achieved that will reduce costs for EU tax payers and industry.
Amendment 964
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a livestock vessel for the transport of animals to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 6 of Annex V. The application shall include the following documents: | 1. The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of a livestock vessel for the transport of animals to the competent authority in TRACES using the form set out in Section 6 of Annex V. In addition, the application shall include the following documents: |
Or. en
Amendment 965
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) a document containing the applicant and livestock vessel details, including conversion date when applicable, plan of vessel with layout of pens, lighting, water drainage, firefighting and ventilation systems; | (a) a document containing the applicant and livestock vessel details, including conversion date when applicable, livestock carrier notation certificate issued by an EU recognized class society, plan of vessel with layout of pens, lighting, water drainage, firefighting, back-up systems, fresh water supply, sewage treatment plant and cold storage room locations, and ventilation systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 966
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) a document containing the applicant and livestock vessel details, including conversion date when applicable, plan of vessel with layout of pens, lighting, water drainage, firefighting and ventilation systems; | (a) a document containing the applicant and livestock vessel details, including conversion date when applicable, livestock carrier notation certificate issued by an EU recognized classification society, plan of vessel with layout of pens, lighting, back-up systems, feed storage facilities, fresh water supply, water drainage, firefighting and ventilation systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 967
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) a document containing the applicant and livestock vessel details, including conversion date when applicable, plan of vessel with layout of pens, lighting, water drainage, firefighting and ventilation systems; | (a) a document containing the applicant and livestock vessel details, including conversion date when applicable, livestock carrier notation certificate issued by an EU recognized class society, plan of vessel with layout of pens, lighting, water drainage, firefighting, back-up systems, freshwater supply, and ventilation systems; |
Or. en
Amendment 968
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) a document containing the applicant and livestock vessel details, including conversion date when applicable, plan of vessel with layout of pens, lighting, water drainage, firefighting and ventilation systems; | (a) a document containing the applicant and livestock vessel details, including conversion date when applicable, plan of vessel with layout of pens, lighting, water drainage, firefighting and ventilation systems and continuous monitoring of the climate conditions inside the pens; |
Or. el
Amendment 969
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) Certificate of competence of the animal welfare officer designated, in accordance with art. 21, as well as any additional certificates of competence for crew members on board; |
Or. en
Amendment 970
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b b) If applicable, copies of the reports of the last five livestock vessel shipments including mortalities, injuries and diseases. |
Or. en
Amendment 971
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b c) Between the date of submission and the inspection of the vessel, there will be at least 15 days, in order for the competent authority to properly assess all documents. | |
| In case submitted documents are incomplete or entail errors, the competent authority shall notify the transporter, together with clear recommendations of how to complete the submission. |
Or. en
Amendment 972
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall grant a certificate of approval of the livestock vessel in TRACES using the form set out in Section 6 of Annex V, provided that it complies with the following conditions: | The The European Maritime Safety Agency shall grant a certificate of approval of the livestock vessel in TRACES using the form set out in Section 6 of Annex V, provided that it complies with the following conditions: |
Or. en
Amendment 973
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a a) correct submission by the transporter of all documents listed in art. 13(1); |
Or. en
Amendment 974
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the vessel has been inspected by the competent authority and found to comply with the requirements of Chapter II and Chapter IV of Annex I applicable to the construction and equipment for livestock vessels; | (c) the vessel has been inspected by an inspection team of the competent authority consisting, at least, of a veterinarian, a marine surveyor, and a marine technician, and further specified in accordance with art. 7(b) and found to comply with the requirements of Chapter II and Chapter IV of Annex I applicable to the construction and equipment for livestock vessels; |
Or. en
Amendment 975
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the vessel has been inspected by the competent authority and found to comply with the requirements of Chapter II and Chapter IV of Annex I applicable to the construction and equipment for livestock vessels; | (c) the vessel has been inspected by a team consisting of the competent authority, a marine surveyor, marine technician and behaviourist, and found to comply with the requirements of Chapter II and Chapter IV of Annex I applicable to the construction and equipment for livestock vessels; |
Or. en
Amendment 976
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the vessel has been inspected by the competent authority and found to comply with the requirements of Chapter II and Chapter IV of Annex I applicable to the construction and equipment for livestock vessels; | (c) the vessel has been inspected by the the European Maritime Safety Agency and found to comply with the requirements of Chapter II and Chapter IV of Annex I applicable to the construction and equipment for livestock vessels; |
Or. en
Amendment 977
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) At least 2 days is allowed for inspections to complete. | |
| If inspections lead to the identification of recommended repairs and alterations prior to approval, the transporter shall take necessary steps to incorporate those recommendations. | |
| Re-inspections to confirm recommended repairs and alterations shall take place prior to approval. | |
| All fees related to (re-)inspection, technicians’ time, and travel to the place of inspection are charged to the transporter. |
Or. en
Amendment 978
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the vessel flies a flag with a flag performance rating of white or grey according to the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on port State control. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
It is important to emphasize that the mere registration of a vessel under a flag considered "white" or "grey" under the Paris Memorandum of Understanding does not automatically guarantee the safety or technical condition of the vessel, but rather the color of the country. Therefore, the fundamental criterion for approving the transport of live animals must be the concrete evaluation of the vessel's technical condition and risk profile, rather than the flag under which it operates.
Amendment 979
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the vessel flies a flag with a flag performance rating of white or grey according to the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on port State control. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 980
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the vessel flies a flag with a flag performance rating of white or grey according to the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on port State control. | (d) the vessel flies a flag with a flag performance rating of white according to the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on port State control, and classed by the highest-performing societies. |
Or. en
Amendment 981
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the vessel flies a flag with a flag performance rating of white or grey according to the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on port State control. | (d) the vessel flies a flag with a flag performance rating of white according to the most recent annual report of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on port State control. |
Or. en
Amendment 982
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d a) the vessel has been classed by a classification society that is on the list of organisations recognised on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations |
Or. en
Amendment 983
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 984
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. | The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian independent from the transporter, a marine surveyor and a marine technician have carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. |
Or. en
Amendment 985
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. | The approval of the livestock vessel shall be carried out by the competent authority, before the first voyage of the vessel and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. |
Or. en
Amendment 986
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. | The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless the designated competent authority has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. |
Or. es
Amendment 987
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. | The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless the designated competent authority has carried out a thorough supervision of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. |
Or. en
Amendment 988
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. | The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian, a marine surveyor and a marine technician have carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. |
Or. en
Amendment 989
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. | The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian and a technician has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. |
Or. en
Amendment 990
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The approval of the livestock vessel shall be suspended unless an official veterinarian has carried out official controls on board of the livestock vessel during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. | The official controls on board of the livestock vessel shall be carried out by a veterinarian, a veterinary technician or a person with equivalent education or training, during the entire first voyage of the vessel following approval and prior to the renewal of such approval, and those controls demonstrated that the construction and equipment of the livestock vessel are not detrimental to the welfare of the animals on board, or effective corrective measures have been taken. |
Or. ro
Amendment 991
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall record any rejection of an application for approval in TRACES and the reasons for its decision. | The European Maritime Safety Agency shall record any rejection of an application for approval in TRACES and the reasons for its decision. |
Or. en
Amendment 992
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall record any rejection of an application for approval in TRACES and the reasons for its decision. | The competent authority shall record the certifications and inspection reports of the approved livestock vessels in the electronic database established in para. 7(a) of this Article. The competent authority shall record any rejection of an application for approval in the electronic database referred to in para. 7(a) of this Article, and in TRACES and the reasons for its decision. |
Or. en
Amendment 993
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 18 months from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 994
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 3 years from the date of issue. The European Maritime Safety Agency shall perform at least two ad-hoc in-use inspections of the means of transport to check on compliance with paragraph 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 995
Milan Mazurek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of issue. |
Or. sk
Amendment 996
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 2 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 997
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 7 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 998
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 5 years from the date of issue. | The certificate of approval shall be valid for a period of not more than 7 years from the date of issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 999
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval of the livestock vessel provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal of the certificate in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1000
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval of the livestock vessel provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal of the certificate in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval of the livestock vessel provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal of the certificate in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. |
| Applications for authorisation or renewal shall be submitted in accordance with the administrative procedure of the Member State where the application is made and shall be registered in TRACES once the procedure has been completed. |
Or. es
Amendment 1001
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval of the livestock vessel provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal of the certificate in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | 4. At least one month before the expiry of the certificate of approval of the livestock vessel provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal of the certificate in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 1002
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval of the livestock vessel provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal of the certificate in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | 4. At least one month before the expiry of the certificate of approval of the livestock vessel provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal of the certificate in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 1003
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. One month before the expiry of the certificate of approval of the livestock vessel provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal of the certificate in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. | 4. At least one month before the expiry of the certificate of approval of the livestock vessel provided for in paragraph 2, the transporter may apply for a renewal of the certificate in TRACES in accordance with the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 1004
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The transporter shall notify the relevant competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment or if the requirement in paragraph 2, point (d) is no longer met. | 5. The transporter shall notify the relevant competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment and shall undergo a novel inspection by a classification society in line with art. 13.2(e) and present an accompanied inspection report. |
Or. en
Amendment 1005
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The transporter shall notify the relevant competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment or if the requirement in paragraph 2, point (d) is no longer met. | 5. The transporter shall notify the European Maritime Safety Agency of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment or if the requirement in paragraph 2, point (d) is no longer met. |
Or. en
Amendment 1006
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The transporter shall notify the relevant competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment or if the requirement in paragraph 2, point (d) is no longer met. | 5. The transporter shall notify the relevant competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment or if the requirement in paragraph 2, point (d) is no longer met. |
| In case of late notification or if the competent authority detects during the previous inspection any modification, retrofitting or deterioration that may affect the welfare of the animals, the competent authority will decide whether to authorise the shipment or to grant a period of time to carry out any adaptation to comply with the regulations. |
Or. en
Amendment 1007
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The transporter shall notify the relevant competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment or if the requirement in paragraph 2, point (d) is no longer met. | 5. The transporter shall notify the relevant competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment or if the requirement in paragraph 2, point (d) is no longer met. |
| If notification is received late or if the competent authority detects, during the pre-inspection, any modification, re-equipment, or deterioration that may affect the welfare of the animals, the authority will decide whether to authorize shipment or grant a period for making any adjustments to comply with the regulations. |
Or. en
Amendment 1008
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The transporter shall notify the relevant competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment or if the requirement in paragraph 2, point (d) is no longer met. | 5. The transporter shall notify the relevant competent authority of any modification, refit or impairment of the vessel that may affect the welfare of the transported animals within 5 days of such modification, refit or impairment or if the requirement in paragraph 2, point (d) is no longer met, and shall suspend the use of the vessel until a fresh inspection has been carried out by the competent authority, where the modification, refit or impairment affects the ventilation, water supply, lighting or firefighting systems. |
Or. el
Amendment 1009
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5 a. The competent authority shall upon publication consult and analyse the most recent annual report of the Paris MoU on port state control to identify and follow-up on changes that have consequences for paragraph 2, point (d). |
Or. en
Amendment 1010
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the vessel no longer meets the conditions provided for in paragraph 2, the competent authority shall order the suspension of the certificate in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and record the suspension in TRACES. | If the vessel no longer meets the conditions provided for in paragraph 2, the competent authority shall order the suspension of the certificate in accordance with Article 138(2), point (j), of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and record the suspension in TRACES, without delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 1011
Maria Grapini
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement indicating the reasons for the suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. | The competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement explicitly indicating the reasons for the suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. |
Or. ro
Amendment 1012
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall provide the transporter with a written statement indicating the reasons for the suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. | The European Maritime Safety Agency shall provide the transporter with a written statement indicating the reasons for the suspension and recommendations to address the deficiencies found. |
Or. en
Amendment 1013
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall lift the suspension if the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their certificate is based. | The European Maritime Safety Agency shall lift the suspension if the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their certificate is based. |
Or. en
Amendment 1014
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The competent authority shall lift the suspension if the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their certificate is based. | The competent authority may consider lifting the suspension if the transporter provides evidence that they have corrected the deficiencies on which the suspension of their certificate is based. |
Or. en
Amendment 1015
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1016
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1017
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate, record this information in TRACES, and communicate to other competent authorities of this withdrawal and the reasons therefore. |
Or. en
Amendment 1018
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificat, without delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 1019
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the European Maritime Safety Agency shall withdraw the certificate. |
Or. en
Amendment 1020
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month certain of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. |
Or. en
Amendment 1021
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within six months of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. |
Or. ro
Amendment 1022
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within one month of the suspension, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. | If the transporter has not corrected the deficiencies within a reasonable time, the competent authority shall withdraw the certificate. |
Or. en
Amendment 1023
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6 a. The carrier, for its part, must submit an action plan establishing the time periods and actions to correct deficiencies. This may never exceed six months in the case of serious or very serious deficiencies. |
Or. en
Amendment 1024
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 49 regarding: | 7. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 48 regarding: |
Or. en
Amendment 1025
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a a) The role and responsibilites of the EMSA in applying the obligations as set out in paragraphs 1-6 of this Article; |
Or. en
Amendment 1026
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the composition of the teams of inspectors to perform the inspections referred to in paragraph 1; | (b) the composition of the teams of inspectors to perform the inspections referred to in paragraph 2, point C; |
Or. en
Justification
Refers to the relevant place
Amendment 1027
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the composition of the teams of inspectors to perform the inspections referred to in paragraph 1; | (b) the composition of the teams of inspectors to perform the inspections referred to in paragraph 2(c); |
Or. en
Amendment 1028
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) detailed rules concerning the presence of an official veterinarian on board for the purpose of approving a livestock vessel. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1029
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) detailed rules concerning the presence of an official veterinarian on board for the purpose of approving a livestock vessel. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1030
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) detailed rules concerning the presence of an official veterinarian on board for the purpose of approving a livestock vessel. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1031
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) detailed rules concerning the presence of an official veterinarian on board for the purpose of approving a livestock vessel. | (c) detailed rules concerning the first inspection report for approval by the competent authority for the purpose of approving a livestock vessel. |
Or. es
Justification
It is not feasible to have an official veterinarian on board to carry out vessel approvals.
Amendment 1032
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) detailed rules concerning the presence of an official veterinarian on board for the purpose of approving a livestock vessel. | (c) detailed rules on the first inspection report for approval by the competent authority for the purpose of approving a livestock vessel. |
Or. en
Amendment 1033
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) detailed rules concerning the presence of an official veterinarian on board for the purpose of approving a livestock vessel. | (c) detailed rules concerning the presence of an official veterinarian, marine surveyor and marine technician on board for the purpose of approving a livestock vessel. |
Or. en
Amendment 1034
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article13a | |
| Certificate of approval of aircrafts for the transport of animals | |
| The transporter shall submit an application for a certificate of approval of an aircraft for the transport of animals to the competent authority in TRACES. | |
| The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 48 detailing the requirements, rules and processes for a transporter to submit an application for and for a competent authority to grant a certificate of approval of an aircraft. These should be aligned with the IATA LAR. Dedicated submission and grant forms should be developed and annexed to Annex V of this Regulation, following the models of submission and grant forms set out in Section 5 and 6 of Annex V. |
Or. en
Amendment 1035
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Organisers shall be responsible for ensuring that the entire journey from the place of departure to the place of destination in the Union or in a third country complies with this Regulation. | 1. Organisers and competent authorities shall be responsible for ensuring that the entire journey from the place of departure to the place of destination, including where applicable the sea leg of the journey, in the Union or in a third country complies with this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 1036
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Organisers shall be responsible for ensuring that the entire journey from the place of departure to the place of destination in the Union or in a third country complies with this Regulation. | 1. Organisers shall be responsible for ensuring that the entire journey from the place of departure to the place of destination in the Union complies with this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 1037
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Organisers shall be responsible for the planning of the journey from the place of departure until the place of destination. The organiser shall comply with the provisions relating to the journey log referred to in Article 15 and shall sign section 1 of the journey log in TRACES as set out in points 1 and 2 of Annex III. | 2. Organisers shall be responsible for the planning of the journey from the place of departure until the place of destination. The organiser shall comply with the provisions relating to the journey log referred to in Article 15 and shall sign section 1 of the journey log as set out in points 1 and 2 of Annex III. In the case of journeys between different countries, the fields concerning the journey log shall be completed in TRACES. |
Or. es
Justification
TRACES should be applied for journeys between countries.
Amendment 1038
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Organisers shall be responsible for the planning of the journey from the place of departure until the place of destination. The organiser shall comply with the provisions relating to the journey log referred to in Article 15 and shall sign section 1 of the journey log in TRACES as set out in points 1 and 2 of Annex III. | 2. Organisers shall be responsible for the planning of the journey from the place of departure until the place of destination, whether inside or outside the Union. The organiser shall comply with the provisions relating to the journey log referred to in Article 15 and shall sign section 1 of the journey log in TRACES as set out in points 1 and 2 of Annex III. |
Or. en
Amendment 1039
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Organisers shall be responsible for the planning of the journey from the place of departure until the place of destination. The organiser shall comply with the provisions relating to the journey log referred to in Article 15 and shall sign section 1 of the journey log in TRACES as set out in points 1 and 2 of Annex III. | 2. Organisers shall be responsible for the planning of the journey from the place of departure until the place of destination. The organiser shall comply with the provisions relating to the journey log referred to in Article 15 and, for cross-border journeys, shall sign section 1 of the journey log in TRACES as set out in points 1 and 2 of Annex III. |
Or. en
Justification
The compulsory use of the TRACES electronic registration system and all its requirements even for short domestic journeys at this stage seems a disproportionate administrative burden, especially for small local operators. Most slaughterhouses already have digital systems in place that are used for logging journeys, and they would all have to communicate with TRACES directly to make this work. We suggest that if TRACES is to be used for logging journeys, it should be mandatory only for cross-border transport, according the rules of the Animal Health Law.
Amendment 1040
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2 a. The organiser shall be legally and financially liable for ensuring that the direct transporter or any subcontracted transporters, including the driver, attendant, or animal welfare officer, comply with the provisions of this Regulation throughout the transport operation. |
Or. en
Amendment 1041
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1042
Marko Vešligaj
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1043
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 1044
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | deleted |
Or. el
Amendment 1045
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure; |
Or. ro
Amendment 1046
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 24 hours prior to departure, except for assembly centres; |
Or. es
Amendment 1047
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 48 hours prior to departure except for one day old-poultry bird ; |
Or. en
Amendment 1048
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 4 weeks prior to departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 1049
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 4 weeks prior to departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 1050
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 24 hours prior to departure, except for assembly centres; |
Or. en
Amendment 1051
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) Animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 24 hours before departure, except for assembly centres; |
Or. en
Amendment 1052
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 24 hours prior to departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 1053
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 48 hours prior to departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 1054
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 48 hours prior to departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 1055
Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 24 hours prior to departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 1056
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 24 hours prior to departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 1057
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 24 hours prior to departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 1058
Milan Mazurek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 3 days prior to departure; |
Or. sk
Amendment 1059
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure in accordance with the requirements as defined in Article 3, Point 2., with the exception of day-old chicks; |
Or. en
Justification
There should be different definitions of the place of departure, including the exemption for an assembly center as the place of departure, as already outlined in Article 3, Point 2. Additionally, day-old chicks must be excluded from this definition in any case, as they have to be transported as fast as possible after hatching.
Amendment 1060
Eric Sargiacomo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure, except for one day-old poultry birds ; |
Or. en
Amendment 1061
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure, except for day-old poultry; |
Or. fr
Justification
Fallback amendment. In the case of poultry, eggs are stored in a hatchery for more than a week before hatching. Day-old chicks are then taken away to be reared.
Amendment 1062
Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure; | a) the animals to be transported are accommodated at the place of departure for at least 1 week prior to departure, except for one day old poultry birds; |
Or. en
Amendment 1063
Philippe Olivier, Valérie Deloge, Julien Leonardelli, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) for equidae, this period shall be reduced to 24 hours; |
Or. fr
Justification
The original proposal requires that the animals be accommodated at the place of departure for at least one week prior to departure. Since horses can move around a lot, it is unrealistic to expect the horse industry to have to comply with this.
Amendment 1064
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| b) the different legs of the journey are coordinated, especially when performed by different operators, in a way that the welfare of the animals is not compromised by insufficient coordination between different parts of the journey or different operators; | b) the different journey segments are coordinated, especially when performed by different operators, in a way that the welfare of the animals is not compromised by insufficient coordination between different journey segments or different operators; |
Or. en
Amendment 1065
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| b) the different legs of the journey are coordinated, especially when performed by different operators, in a way that the welfare of the animals is not compromised by insufficient coordination between different parts of the journey or different operators; | b) the different legs of the journey are coordinated, especially when performed by different operators, in a way that the welfare of the animals is not compromised by insufficient coordination between different parts or legs of the journey or different operators; |
Or. en
Amendment 1066
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| b) the different legs of the journey are coordinated, especially when performed by different operators, in a way that the welfare of the animals is not compromised by insufficient coordination between different parts of the journey or different operators; | b) the different legs of the journey are coordinated, especially when performed by different operators, and in particular when sea transport is involved, in a way that the welfare of the animals is not compromised by insufficient coordination between different parts of the journey or different operators; |
Or. en
Amendment 1067
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| b a) all means of transport contracted or intervening within the European territory, have both the personnel and the means of transport valid to ensure compliance with this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 1068
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 1069
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | deleted |
Or. el
Amendment 1070
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Emma Wiesner, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1071
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1072
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1073
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1074
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1075
Marko Vešligaj
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1076
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | c) the organisation of the journey takes into account any aspects that could affect the performance of the journey or compromise the welfare of the animals; |
Or. es
Justification
When organising the journey, consideration should be given to the various aspects that could compromise the welfare of the animals and not only to the temperature. On the other hand, a proposal based exclusively on average temperatures would discriminate against regions where climatic conditions do not fall within the average ranges of the proposal, and would not take into account the adaptability of the animals or the technological options that can be implemented.
Amendment 1077
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | c) the organisation of the journey takes into account any aspects that may affect the success of the trip or compromise the safety of the animals. |
Or. en
Amendment 1078
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast, including for the sea leg of the journey, when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; |
Or. en
Amendment 1079
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned, for the whole duration of the journey, in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; |
Or. en
Amendment 1080
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast when relevant for the species and categories of animals concerned in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; | c) the organisation of the journey takes into account the temperature forecast for the species and categories of animals concerned, where relevant, in accordance with Article 31 and Chapter V of Annex I; |
Or. en
Amendment 1081
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| d) an individual is designated to provide information on the planning, execution, and completion of the journey to the competent authorities at the place of departure, assembly centres, control posts and establishments of destination at any time. | d) an individual is designated to provide information on the planning, execution, and completion of the journey to the competent authorities at the place of departure, assembly centres, control posts and establishments of destination at any time. This individual could also be the organiser. |
Or. en
Amendment 1082
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| d) an individual is designated to provide information on the planning, execution, and completion of the journey to the competent authorities at the place of departure, assembly centres, control posts and establishments of destination at any time. | d) a contact is established to provide information on the planning, execution, and completion of the journey to the competent authorities at the place of departure, assembly centres, control posts and establishments of destination at any time. |
Or. en
Amendment 1083
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| d) an individual is designated to provide information on the planning, execution, and completion of the journey to the competent authorities at the place of departure, assembly centres, control posts and establishments of destination at any time. | d) establish contact to provide information on the planning, execution, and completion of the journey to the competent authorities at the place of departure, assembly centres, control posts and establishments of destination at any time. |
Or. en
Amendment 1084
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Gabriel Mato, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article14a | |
| Obligations for competent authorities | |
| 1. Competent authorities shall be responsible for ensuring that the entire journey from the place of departure to the place of destination in the Union and in a third country complies with this Regulation. | |
| 2. The competent authority shall be responsible for all the livestock movements that they validate, including: a. the reception of the animals and their condition at destination for any travel that passes international water; | |
| 3. In the case of third countries acting as place of origin, the competent authority shall be responsible for ensuring that before the loading of the animals all documentation, including sanitary, is in order. In the case of a Member State acting as a place of origin or destination, the competent authority shall be responsible for animal welfare and movement monitoring. |
Or. en
Amendment 1085
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Journey log for all long journeys and short journeys to third countries | Journey log for long journeys between Member States and long journeys to third countries |
Or. en
Amendment 1086
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Journey log for all long journeys and short journeys to third countries | Journey log for all long journeys |
Or. en
Justification
This amendment with the deletion of "and short journeys to third countries" is to be seen as a horizontal amendment for the entirety of Article 15. There is no professional necessity to apply the requirements for long journeys to short journeys to a third country. Trade agreements with third countries would be a much more effective solution for animal welfare during transport.
Amendment 1087
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Journey log for all long journeys and short journeys to third countries | Journey log for long journeys and short journeys to third countries |
Or. en
Amendment 1088
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Journey log for all long journeys and short journeys to third countries | Journey log for long journeys and short journeys to third countries |
Or. en
Amendment 1089
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. For long journeys and short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. | 1. For long journeys between Member States and long journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. |
Or. en
Amendment 1090
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. For long journeys and short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. | 1. For long journeys, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. |
Or. en
Amendment 1091
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. For long journeys and short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. | 1. For long journeys between Member States and journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. |
Or. en
Amendment 1092
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. For long journeys and short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. | 1. For long journeys between Member States and to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. |
Or. fr
Justification
TRACES is subject to the rules and requirements of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 on official controls and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1715. The term ‘short journeys’ appears in neither. The rules currently require each journey to be recorded in a company system or, in the case of animals transported between Member States and to third countries, in TRACES.
Amendment 1093
Marko Vešligaj
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. For long journeys and short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. | 1. For long journeys between Member States and to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. |
Or. en
Amendment 1094
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. For long journeys and short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. | 1. For all long journeys and short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. |
Or. en
Amendment 1095
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. For long journeys and short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. | 1. For long journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. |
Or. es
Justification
TRACES is subject to the rules and requirements laid down in the Official Controls Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2017/625) and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1715. Neither of those texts makes any reference to ‘short journeys’.
Amendment 1096
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. For long journeys and short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. | 1. For long or short journeys to third countries, organisers shall complete in TRACES section 1 of the journey log prior to the journey, as set out in point 1 of Annex III. |
Or. en