amendment list, 16 April 2025
Protection of animals during transport and related operations
Document CJ48-AM-773029 · (COM(2023)0770 – C9-0446/2023 – 2023/0448(COD))
Committee on Transport and Tourism Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
Full text
Jump to an amendment (389)
- Amendment 262
- Amendment 263
- Amendment 264
- Amendment 265
- Amendment 266
- Amendment 267
- Amendment 268
- Amendment 269
- Amendment 270
- Amendment 271
- Amendment 272
- Amendment 273
- Amendment 274
- Amendment 275
- Amendment 276
- Amendment 277
- Amendment 278
- Amendment 279
- Amendment 280
- Amendment 281
- Amendment 282
- Amendment 283
- Amendment 284
- Amendment 285
- Amendment 286
- Amendment 287
- Amendment 288
- Amendment 289
- Amendment 290
- Amendment 291
- Amendment 292
- Amendment 293
- Amendment 294
- Amendment 295
- Amendment 296
- Amendment 297
- Amendment 298
- Amendment 299
- Amendment 300
- Amendment 301
- Amendment 302
- Amendment 303
- Amendment 304
- Amendment 305
- Amendment 306
- Amendment 307
- Amendment 308
- Amendment 309
- Amendment 310
- Amendment 311
- Amendment 312
- Amendment 313
- Amendment 314
- Amendment 315
- Amendment 316
- Amendment 317
- Amendment 318
- Amendment 319
- Amendment 320
- Amendment 321
- Amendment 322
- Amendment 323
- Amendment 324
- Amendment 325
- Amendment 326
- Amendment 327
- Amendment 328
- Amendment 329
- Amendment 330
- Amendment 331
- Amendment 332
- Amendment 333
- Amendment 334
- Amendment 335
- Amendment 336
- Amendment 337
- Amendment 338
- Amendment 339
- Amendment 340
- Amendment 341
- Amendment 342
- Amendment 343
- Amendment 344
- Amendment 345
- Amendment 346
- Amendment 347
- Amendment 348
- Amendment 349
- Amendment 350
- Amendment 351
- Amendment 352
- Amendment 353
- Amendment 354
- Amendment 355
- Amendment 356
- Amendment 357
- Amendment 358
- Amendment 359
- Amendment 360
- Amendment 361
- Amendment 362
- Amendment 363
- Amendment 364
- Amendment 365
- Amendment 366
- Amendment 367
- Amendment 368
- Amendment 369
- Amendment 370
- Amendment 371
- Amendment 372
- Amendment 373
- Amendment 374
- Amendment 375
- Amendment 376
- Amendment 377
- Amendment 378
- Amendment 379
- Amendment 380
- Amendment 381
- Amendment 382
- Amendment 383
- Amendment 384
- Amendment 385
- Amendment 386
- Amendment 387
- Amendment 388
- Amendment 389
- Amendment 390
- Amendment 391
- Amendment 392
- Amendment 393
- Amendment 394
- Amendment 395
- Amendment 396
- Amendment 397
- Amendment 398
- Amendment 399
- Amendment 400
- Amendment 401
- Amendment 402
- Amendment 403
- Amendment 404
- Amendment 405
- Amendment 406
- Amendment 407
- Amendment 408
- Amendment 409
- Amendment 410
- Amendment 411
- Amendment 412
- Amendment 413
- Amendment 414
- Amendment 415
- Amendment 416
- Amendment 417
- Amendment 418
- Amendment 419
- Amendment 420
- Amendment 421
- Amendment 422
- Amendment 423
- Amendment 424
- Amendment 425
- Amendment 426
- Amendment 427
- Amendment 428
- Amendment 429
- Amendment 430
- Amendment 431
- Amendment 432
- Amendment 433
- Amendment 434
- Amendment 435
- Amendment 436
- Amendment 437
- Amendment 438
- Amendment 439
- Amendment 440
- Amendment 441
- Amendment 442
- Amendment 443
- Amendment 444
- Amendment 445
- Amendment 446
- Amendment 447
- Amendment 448
- Amendment 449
- Amendment 450
- Amendment 451
- Amendment 452
- Amendment 453
- Amendment 454
- Amendment 455
- Amendment 456
- Amendment 457
- Amendment 458
- Amendment 459
- Amendment 460
- Amendment 461
- Amendment 462
- Amendment 463
- Amendment 464
- Amendment 465
- Amendment 466
- Amendment 467
- Amendment 468
- Amendment 469
- Amendment 470
- Amendment 471
- Amendment 472
- Amendment 473
- Amendment 474
- Amendment 475
- Amendment 476
- Amendment 477
- Amendment 478
- Amendment 479
- Amendment 480
- Amendment 481
- Amendment 482
- Amendment 483
- Amendment 484
- Amendment 485
- Amendment 486
- Amendment 487
- Amendment 488
- Amendment 489
- Amendment 490
- Amendment 491
- Amendment 492
- Amendment 493
- Amendment 494
- Amendment 495
- Amendment 496
- Amendment 497
- Amendment 498
- Amendment 499
- Amendment 500
- Amendment 501
- Amendment 502
- Amendment 503
- Amendment 504
- Amendment 505
- Amendment 506
- Amendment 507
- Amendment 508
- Amendment 509
- Amendment 510
- Amendment 511
- Amendment 512
- Amendment 513
- Amendment 514
- Amendment 515
- Amendment 516
- Amendment 517
- Amendment 518
- Amendment 519
- Amendment 520
- Amendment 521
- Amendment 522
- Amendment 523
- Amendment 524
- Amendment 525
- Amendment 526
- Amendment 527
- Amendment 528
- Amendment 529
- Amendment 530
- Amendment 531
- Amendment 532
- Amendment 533
- Amendment 534
- Amendment 535
- Amendment 536
- Amendment 537
- Amendment 538
- Amendment 539
- Amendment 540
- Amendment 541
- Amendment 542
- Amendment 543
- Amendment 544
- Amendment 545
- Amendment 546
- Amendment 547
- Amendment 548
- Amendment 549
- Amendment 550
- Amendment 551
- Amendment 552
- Amendment 553
- Amendment 554
- Amendment 555
- Amendment 556
- Amendment 557
- Amendment 558
- Amendment 559
- Amendment 560
- Amendment 561
- Amendment 562
- Amendment 563
- Amendment 564
- Amendment 565
- Amendment 566
- Amendment 567
- Amendment 568
- Amendment 569
- Amendment 570
- Amendment 571
- Amendment 572
- Amendment 573
- Amendment 574
- Amendment 575
- Amendment 576
- Amendment 577
- Amendment 578
- Amendment 579
- Amendment 580
- Amendment 581
- Amendment 582
- Amendment 583
- Amendment 584
- Amendment 585
- Amendment 586
- Amendment 587
- Amendment 588
- Amendment 589
- Amendment 590
- Amendment 591
- Amendment 592
- Amendment 593
- Amendment 594
- Amendment 595
- Amendment 596
- Amendment 597
- Amendment 598
- Amendment 599
- Amendment 600
- Amendment 601
- Amendment 602
- Amendment 603
- Amendment 604
- Amendment 605
- Amendment 606
- Amendment 607
- Amendment 608
- Amendment 609
- Amendment 610
- Amendment 611
- Amendment 612
- Amendment 613
- Amendment 614
- Amendment 615
- Amendment 616
- Amendment 617
- Amendment 618
- Amendment 619
- Amendment 620
- Amendment 621
- Amendment 622
- Amendment 623
- Amendment 624
- Amendment 625
- Amendment 626
- Amendment 627
- Amendment 628
- Amendment 629
- Amendment 630
- Amendment 631
- Amendment 632
- Amendment 633
- Amendment 634
- Amendment 635
- Amendment 636
- Amendment 637
- Amendment 638
- Amendment 639
- Amendment 640
- Amendment 641
- Amendment 642
- Amendment 643
- Amendment 644
- Amendment 645
- Amendment 646
- Amendment 647
- Amendment 648
- Amendment 649
- Amendment 650
Text 2,435 paragraphs
Amendment 262
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. | (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that the unloading and loading activities are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, for journeys by road or rail, rest periods with unloading and loading should be minimised. The maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. |
| 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. | 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. |
Or. en
Amendment 263
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. | (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. In addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. |
| 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. | 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. |
Or. en
Read the rest (2,423 paragraphs)
Amendment 264
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. | (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, journeys should be kept as short as possible. In addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should always be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. |
| 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. | 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. |
Or. en
Amendment 265
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. | (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, for journeys by road or rail, rest periods with unloading and loading should be minimized. In addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. |
| 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. | 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. |
Or. en
Amendment 266
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. | (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that unloading and loading along the journey is detrimental to animal welfare, as it leads to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, on long journeys, unloading and loading should be reduced as much as possible. For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. |
| 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. | 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85, OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. |
Or. es
Justification
EFSA notes the problems animals experience during loading and unloading, but does not give a maximum number of loading and unloading operations. There is also no justification for the fact that stops where animals are unloaded and loaded cannot be made at checkpoints. For the sake of consistency, the part of the text on animals for slaughter should be removed.
Amendment 267
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. | (38) EFSA opinions confirmed with unloading and loading along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, loading and unloading on long journeys should be reduced as far as possible and with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. |
| 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. | 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. |
Or. en
Amendment 268
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. | (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 8 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. |
| 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. | 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. |
Or. en
Amendment 269
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. | (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for all transports, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. |
| 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. | 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. |
Or. en
Amendment 270
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. | (38) EFSA opinions confirmed that too many stops with unloading and loading in control posts along the journey are detrimental to animal welfare, as they lead to additional handling of animals, with consequent additional stress and increased risk of exposure to injury and infections. Therefore, long journeys should not include more than one rest period with unloading and loading.For journeys by road or rail longer than 9 hours for purposes other than for slaughter, in addition to the latest scientific advice from the EFSA, the maximum driving periods and minimum rest periods for road drivers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 561/200622 should be taken into consideration in order to better coordinate with the journey times and rest periods of the animals transported. Some species and/or categories of animals should be allowed to rest in the vehicle where unloading them might compromise their health status, when specific conditions are provided. |
| 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. | 22 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1–14. |
Or. en
Amendment 271
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. |
Or. en
Amendment 272
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Excessive detail in EU legislation can create unnecessary complexity and reduce flexibility in implementation. Instead of rigid prescriptive measures, transport requirements should focus on ensuring the welfare of animals through outcome-based standards. While scientific advice supports increasing the minimum age and weight of animals before transport to enhance their resilience, regulatory provisions should allow for practical and innovative solutions that ensure animal welfare without imposing overly restrictive time limits. |
Or. en
Amendment 273
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. The journey time for the transport by road of unweaned calves, lambs, kids, and piglets should consist of a maximum of two parts, each of them not exceeding nine hours. After the first nine hours and if the animals have not reached their final place of destination, a rest period of at least one hour without unloading should take place and animals shall be given water and nutrition such as electrolytes if appropriate taking into account the animal’s species, their physiological needs and the sanitary rules; |
Or. en
Amendment 274
Emma Wiesner, Elsi Katainen, Christine Singer
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age for transport of these animals should be increased, unless the health of the animal can be ensured in other ways. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. |
Or. en
Amendment 275
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 276
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 277
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs is not ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. As a consequence, transport of unweaned animals should not be allowed. |
Or. en
Amendment 278
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy , Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 9 hours, followed by a break of at least 1 hour so that they can be hydrated and fed, before a second journey lasting no more than 9 hours, unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. |
Or. fr
Amendment 279
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport, notably with a stronger immune system. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. |
Or. en
Amendment 280
Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk, electrolyte feed, or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. |
Or. en
Amendment 281
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature under the appropriate conditions. | (39) Unweaned animals are particularly vulnerable during transport and feeding them on board in accordance with their needs should be ensured. Following EFSA’s scientific advice, the minimum age and weight of these animals before they can be transported should be increased so that they are more resilient and fit for transport. In addition, these animals should be transported for a maximum period of 8 hours unless a system is in place on board the means of transport, allowing unweaned animals to be effectively fed with milk or milk replacement at body temperature or electrolyte under the appropriate conditions. |
Or. en
Amendment 282
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems, the Commission should approve these systems based on the scientific and technical evidence of their effectiveness of intended use and conformity with the rules set out in this Regulation. The Commission should also be assisted in this task by EFSA. | (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. |
Or. en
Amendment 283
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems, the Commission should approve these systems based on the scientific and technical evidence of their effectiveness of intended use and conformity with the rules set out in this Regulation. The Commission should also be assisted in this task by EFSA. | (40) Experience with the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 has highlighted the challenges of ensuring adequate feeding for unweaned animals. These animals require species-specific milk or suitable milk replacers at body temperature, provided under conditions that mimic natural feeding and at intervals that prevent prolonged hunger. To facilitate compliance, transporters should have full flexibility to choose the feeding system that best suits their vehicle and operational needs. |
Or. en
Amendment 284
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems, the Commission should approve these systems based on the scientific and technical evidence of their effectiveness of intended use and conformity with the rules set out in this Regulation. The Commission should also be assisted in this task by EFSA. | (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that unweaned animals require species-specific food; however, in practice, the use of milk or milk substitutes during transport can create hygiene issues and increase the risk of contamination. To prevent dehydration and metabolic imbalances, it is recommended that, during transport, unweaned animals be provided with water enriched with electrolytes, a solution that helps maintain hydration and electrolyte balance. The electrolyte water systems must be designed to allow each animal access to an adequate amount of liquid with minimal intervention from the staff and should be easy to clean and disinfect to prevent contamination. Especially in roll-on/roll-off sea transport, consideration must be given to the limited space and the movement of the vessel, with watering systems adapted to these conditions. |
Or. en
Amendment 285
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems, the Commission should approve these systems based on the scientific and technical evidence of their effectiveness of intended use and conformity with the rules set out in this Regulation. The Commission should also be assisted in this task by EFSA. | (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. |
Or. fr
Amendment 286
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems, the Commission should approve these systems based on the scientific and technical evidence of their effectiveness of intended use and conformity with the rules set out in this Regulation. The Commission should also be assisted in this task by EFSA. | (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the water and nutrition such as electrolytes to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by qualified animal technicians or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems, the Commission should approve these systems based on the scientific and technical evidence of their effectiveness of intended use and conformity with the rules set out in this Regulation. The Commission should also be assisted in this task by EFSA. |
Or. en
Amendment 287
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems, the Commission should approve these systems based on the scientific and technical evidence of their effectiveness of intended use and conformity with the rules set out in this Regulation. The Commission should also be assisted in this task by EFSA. | (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging and unfulfilled requirement. Unweaned animals, taken away from their mothers, must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems are not designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement to every animal on board, requiring need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system is not adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel further complicate fulfulling the feeding requirement. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems that negatively impact the welfare of unweaned animals, the Commission should not approve these systems as an alternative to adequately feed unweaned animals during transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 288
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems, the Commission should approve these systems based on the scientific and technical evidence of their effectiveness of intended use and conformity with the rules set out in this Regulation. The Commission should also be assisted in this task by EFSA. | (40) Experience with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 shows that providing adequate feeding for unweaned animals is a challenging requirement to fulfil. Unweaned animals must be fed species-specific milk or appropriate milk replacement at body temperature or electrolyte under conditions similar to natural milk feeding and with intervals that prevent onset of long-term hunger. Feeding systems should be designed to allow delivery of the milk or milk replacement or electrolyte to every animal on board, with minimal need for intervention by attendants or drivers. Maintenance should allow appropriate cleaning and disinfection to prevent contamination of the milk or electrolyte. The feeding system should be adapted to the circumstances and the type of transport in which it is intended to be used. In particular, when animals are transported by roll-on-roll-off vessel, the limited space around the means of transport and the motion of the vessel should be taken into account. In order to avoid the development of inconsistencies in feeding systems, the Commission should approve these systems based on the scientific and technical evidence of their effectiveness of intended use and conformity with the rules set out in this Regulation. The Commission should also be assisted in this task by EFSA. |
Or. en
Amendment 289
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40 a) Unweaned animals should not be transported, as it is not possible to give them the required care and feeding during transport and the risk of exposure to infectious diseases, while their immune systems are immature, is too high. |
Or. en
Amendment 290
Jessica Polfjärd, Tomas Tobé
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. Provided that animals on board of sea vessels such as livestock vessels, container vessels and roll-on-roll-off vessels have sufficient space to be able to lie down and rest, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 291
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. Provided that animals on board of sea vessels such as livestock vessels, container vessels and roll-on-roll-off vessels have sufficient space to be able to lie down and rest, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. | (41) EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles. EFSA and other scientific research also recognizes that animals can experience motion stress during sea transport and when conditions at sea are particularly rough, motion stress is expected to be substantial for animals. There are also various other stressors that are just as applicable at sea as in other modes of transport such as the potential for hunger and thirst to arise and the effect of mixing with other unknown animals. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is also detrimental for their welfare. The time spent at sea, as it is for road and rail, should be counted as journey time. particularly as there would be the risk that should the time not be counted, that operators and transporters could shift their operations entirely to sea journeys unlimited in time and in turn circumvent all land travel obligations. Sea journeys should therefore be limited to a maximum of 48 hours, or 24 hours for unweaned animals. Where a competent authority designated by a Member State considers, upon a sea state and weather forecast provided by a qualified meteorological information service, that exceptionally bad weather or sea conditions are creating a threat for the safety or welfare of animals, it should inform the master of a ship, which intends to leave the port, of the situation and should prohibit the ship from leaving the port, until the situation returns to normal. |
Or. en
Amendment 292
Stefan Köhler, Jens Gieseke, Lena Düpont, Marion Walsmann, Christine Schneider, Norbert Lins, Alexandra Mehnert
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. Provided that animals on board of sea vessels such as livestock vessels, container vessels and roll-on-roll-off vessels have sufficient space to be able to lie down and rest, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. | (41) EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are therefore limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. The EFSA opinion also concludes that, in addition to the motion stress involved in road transport, roll-on-roll-off ferries entail additional problems if the sea is rough and/or the vehicles on the ferry are not properly secured against movement in any direction. Therefore, during journeys on roll-on-roll-off ferries, motion stress is even more relevant than during road transport. Furthermore, according to EFSA opinions, additional stress hazards are posed by possible waiting times at ports, extreme weather conditions at sea as well as heat stress due to poor air conditions if the transport vehicles are parked below deck. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals in a means of transport on roll-on-roll-off ferries is to be considered at least equal to the stresses involved in road and rail transport, with the result being that even at sea animals cannot be expected to travel for longer than a defined total journey time. Provided that animals are accommodated on board of livestock vessels or container vessels that meet the requirements set out in Chapter IV of Annex I, and that there they have sufficient space to be able to lie down and rest, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. |
Or. de
Amendment 293
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. Provided that animals on board of sea vessels such as livestock vessels, container vessels and roll-on-roll-off vessels have sufficient space to be able to lie down and rest, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. | (41) EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not only exposed to motion stress, several other factors specific to sea transport are even more detrimental for their welfare compared to road transport, such as extreme weather forecasts at sea, long journeys, unability to avoid rough sea due to long journeys and accumulation of manure during the journey, leading to animal welfare and health problems. Animals on board of sea vessels such as livestock vessels, container vessels and roll-on-roll-off vessels should have sufficient space to be able to lie down and rest, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, but this is not guaranteed. As the time spent at sea is part of a transport and involves high risks for the animals being transported, it should always be counted as journey time. |
Or. en
Amendment 294
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. Provided that animals on board of sea vessels such as livestock vessels, container vessels and roll-on-roll-off vessels have sufficient space to be able to lie down and rest, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. | (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. The time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. |
Or. en
Amendment 295
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. Provided that animals on board of sea vessels such as livestock vessels, container vessels and roll-on-roll-off vessels have sufficient space to be able to lie down and rest, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. | (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. Moreover, excessive detail in EU legislation can create unnecessary complexity and lead to rigid, prescriptive measures that may not reflect practical realities. Therefore, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. |
Or. en
Amendment 296
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. Provided that animals on board of sea vessels such as livestock vessels, container vessels and roll-on-roll-off vessels have sufficient space to be able to lie down and rest, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. | (41) While EFSA scientific opinions identify motion stress as an important risk for the welfare of animals transported in road vehicles, they do not reach the same conclusion with respect to motion stress in means of transport at sea. Journey times on means of transport by road and rail are limited and rest periods are required with the purpose of mitigating the effects of motion stress on the welfare of transported animals. Animals transported by sea are not exposed to the same type of motion as animals transported by road or rail. Motion on sea vessels does not impact animals’ stability in the same way as motion on road vehicles, where they are subjected to repeated and unexpected sudden movements. Consequently, the impact of sea transport on animals is less detrimental for their welfare. Provided that animals on board of sea vessels such as livestock vessels, container vessels and roll-on-roll-off vessels have sufficient space, have feed and water in sufficient amounts and at appropriate intervals, the time spent at sea should not be counted as journey time. |
Or. fr
Amendment 297
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Trucks equipped with air conditioning or other ventilation systems are necessary to ensure that animals are protected and their welfare is upheld during transport, in the event of extreme temperatures. |
Or. es
Amendment 298
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and requires advanced sensors to be placed in appropriate positions in order to adequately capture inside temperatures. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents, use of mechanical ventilation systems, use of heating systems in cold temperatures and providing more space for the animals. Should an organiser however use a mode of transport that has a type approved technology that can control internal ambient temperatures and can be monitored by way of type approved internal thermometers and hygrometers in order to ensure that internal temperatures and humidity can be maintained, then such a derogation can be allowed. |
Or. en
Amendment 299
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. When the truck is equipped with a temperature regulation system, the internal temperature should be monitored. In the absence of such a system, alternative measures—such as opening vents and providing additional space for the animals—are recommended to mitigate potential adverse effects of temperature fluctuations on board. |
Or. en
Amendment 300
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. It is appropriate to take special measures during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. |
Or. en
Amendment 301
Bert-Jan Ruissen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly. However, in case of extreme outside temperatures, the temperature inside the vehicle should be taken into account when the truck is adapted for regulating temperature. |
Or. en
Amendment 302
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. As the temperature inside of the vehicle is affected by the temperature outside, but is influenced by other variables, such as stocking density or animals’ own body heat, temperature and humidity, both temperatures inside and outside the vehicle must be taken into account and monitored to ensure that animals will not face extreme temperatures. It is appropriate to not allow journeys during extreme temperatures to prevent the exposure of animals to hypothermia, including shivering, stiff muscles and freezing during cold temperatures, and heat stress, including shortness of breath and exhaustion, during warm temperatures. In addition, measures reducing potential negative effects of the temperature on board, should also be taken, such as using heating/air-conditioning systems, opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. Temperature monitoring instruments must always be inspected, calibrated and certified by the competent authorities. |
Or. en
Amendment 303
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. However, the temperature inside the vehicle shall be considered in the case of extreme temperatures when the truck has the possibility to regulate the temperature. |
Or. en
Amendment 304
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult. Taking into account animal species, age, physiological needs and geographical specificities, the transporter should ensure that the trucks transporting the animals are equipped with ventilation systems designed, constructed and maintained in such a way that, at any time during the journey, whether the means of transport is stationary or moving, they are capable of maintaining a range of temperatures from 5°C and 30°C within the means of transport, for all animals with a tolerance of +/-5° degrees, depending on the outside temperature. |
Or. en
Amendment 305
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy , Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road is essential, and priority should be given to transport in vehicles equipped with air conditioning. Where it is not possible to transport animals in vehicles equipped with adequate air conditioning, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. |
Or. fr
Amendment 306
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is a factor that may impact their welfare. However, the temperature inside the vehicle must be considered in cases of extreme temperatures, when the truck is equipped for temperature regulation. Given technological advancements, vehicles used for the transport of live animals can be equipped with efficient cooling and heating systems, which allow the maintenance of the temperature inside the animal compartment within optimal limits for each species, regardless of external climatic conditions. By using these technologies, compliance with animal welfare requirements during transport can be ensured, without any EU member state being disadvantaged by the specific climatic conditions of the region. Thus, transport can take place under uniform animal protection conditions, ensuring that exposure to extreme temperatures is prevented and that animal welfare is maintained throughout the journey.4o mini |
Or. en
Amendment 307
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Therefore, the most recent weather forecast should be considered when planning the journey and completing the journey log taking into account internal and external temperatures of the vehicle, regardless of it being stationery or moving. It is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these or to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures reducing potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals or using heating and air-conditioning systems. |
Or. en
Amendment 308
Emma Wiesner, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, vehicles used for transport must be able to ensure optimal temperature for the animals transported regardless of the outdoor temperature. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. |
Or. en
Amendment 309
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. At the same time, consideration should be given to measuring the temperature inside the vehicles. If the temperature inside the vehicle is stable and reliably measurable, it should determine the acceptability of transport and not weather forecasts, which are characterised by lower reliability and high variability in time and space. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. |
Or. en
Amendment 310
Carlo Fidanza, Sergio Berlato, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Ventola
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. In each case, these indications shall be adapted by evaluating the climatic characteristics in the various Member States and they must still take into account the configurations of the trucks. |
| (The needs of the species of animal being transported, the animals' adaptation to the climatic conditions, and the insulation and ventilation of the means of transport need to be taken into account.) |
Or. it
Amendment 311
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is costly and likely unsustainable. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. | (42) The temperature experienced by animals during transport is an important factor impacting their welfare. Measuring inside temperatures while on the road has proven difficult and does not easily allow for remedial actions to be taken. Maintaining temperature limits within a vehicle based on ventilation systems is difficult as it depends on many factors, including humidity and space provided on board, and is unable to actively cool or warm the air. Transporting animals in trucks equipped with air conditioning is therefore a better option, even though it is due to the cost not yet available for every means of transport. Therefore, it is appropriate to give transporters a choice. Either they limit journey times during extreme temperatures to reduce the exposure of animals to these and, in the most extreme cases, to allow the transport of animals only during the night. In addition, measures palliating potential negative effects of the temperature on board should also be taken, such as opening the truck vents and providing more space for the animals. Or, climate control systems are installed in the means of transport, which implies no restrictions on journey times specific to extreme temperatures. This choice would also take into account those transporters who already invested in better equipment to improve animal welfare. |
Or. en
Amendment 312
Stefan Köhler, Jens Gieseke, Lena Düpont, Marion Walsmann, Christine Schneider, Norbert Lins, Alexandra Mehnert
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42a) The European Union is committed to the protection and promotion of high animal welfare standards. This commitment requires considerable effort and must not be undermined by the movement of live animals to third countries where adequate animal welfare is not ensured. Respect for animal welfare standards must not end at the EU's borders. Third countries receiving live animals from the European Union must therefore submit a declaration of compliance with the guidelines on animal welfare in international trade of the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). If there is a reasonable suspicion of harm or threat of harm to animals, the European Commission has the power to initiate an investigation. If this investigation reveals non-compliance with the animal welfare guidelines, the Commission may prohibit the transport of live animals to the third country concerned until further notice. |
Or. de
Amendment 313
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42 a) In addition to restricting the temperature range during transport, the Member States should develop heat plans to prepare for action to be taken to protect animals during heat waves. These heat plans should include a reduction of the amount of animals kept in farms, by setting up breeding restrictions before the start of the summer, and the implementation of measures to prevent the occurrence of heat stress in animals, by lowering the slaughtering speed in slaughterhouses in order to limit the amount of animals arriving at the slaughterhouse at the same time, setting up maximum waiting times at slaughterhouses, mandatory ventilation in all vehicles used to transport animals and performing additional, adequate controls during heat waves to report possible infringements of this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 314
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42 a) In the case of requirements to ensure minimum space available per animal in a vehicle, the current EU rules should be maintained. Increasing the minimum surface area can lead to a multiplication of transports and consequently to increased greenhouse gas emissions and transport costs. In addition, increased space between or above animals can cause problems in maintaining adequate temperature in the vehicle in winter and increase the risk of injury, especially during braking, turning or other manoeuvers. |
Or. en
Amendment 315
Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42 a) The price increase that will be a consequence of the Regulation on each product, calculated on an annual basis, will lead to a corresponding, equal increase in tariffs for these products from third countries, for the following year. |
Or. en
Amendment 316
Salvatore De Meo, Flavio Tosi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42a) These indications shall be adapted by evaluating the climatic characteristics in the various Member States and they must still take into account the configurations of the trucks. |
Or. it
Amendment 317
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) Organisers transporting animals to a place of destination in a third country must arrange an evaluation of the first journey by a certification body in order to determine the organiser’s ability to ensure compliance with this Regulation until the arrival of the animals at the place of destination in the third country. If the conditions laid down in this Regulation are not fulfilled, the competent authority should suspend the organiser’s authorisation with respect to transport to third countries. The certification body should regularly evaluate journeys to third countries arranged by the organiser with a view to determining continues to have the means to comply with this Regulation. Certification bodies should have the required knowledge and qualifications, provide guarantees of continued independence from organisers, transporters and any other person or entity involved in the transport or handling of animals during transport and should be accredited by national accreditation bodies established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/200823 . | (43) Organisers transporting animals to a place of destination in a third country must arrange an evaluation before the first journey by a certification body in order to determine the organiser’s ability to ensure compliance with this Regulation until the arrival of the animals at the place of destination in the third country. The certification body should regularly evaluate journeys to third countries arranged by the organiser with a view to determining continues to have the means to comply with this Regulation. Certification bodies should have the required knowledge and qualifications, provide guarantees of continued independence from organisers, transporters and any other person or entity involved in the transport or handling of animals during transport and should be accredited by national accreditation bodies established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/200823 . |
| 23 Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93, OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30–47 | 23 Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93, OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30–47 |
Or. en
Amendment 318
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) Organisers transporting animals to a place of destination in a third country must arrange an evaluation of the first journey by a certification body in order to determine the organiser’s ability to ensure compliance with this Regulation until the arrival of the animals at the place of destination in the third country. If the conditions laid down in this Regulation are not fulfilled, the competent authority should suspend the organiser’s authorisation with respect to transport to third countries. The certification body should regularly evaluate journeys to third countries arranged by the organiser with a view to determining continues to have the means to comply with this Regulation. Certification bodies should have the required knowledge and qualifications, provide guarantees of continued independence from organisers, transporters and any other person or entity involved in the transport or handling of animals during transport and should be accredited by national accreditation bodies established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/200823 . | (43) Organisers transporting animals to a place of destination in a third country must arrange an evaluation before the first journey by a certification body in order to determine the organiser’s ability to ensure compliance with this Regulation until the arrival of the animals at the place of destination in the third country. The certification body should regularly evaluate journeys to third countries arranged by the organiser with a view to determining continues to have the means to comply with this Regulation. Certification bodies should have the required knowledge and qualifications, provide guarantees of continued independence from organisers, transporters and any other person or entity involved in the transport or handling of animals during transport and should be accredited by national accreditation bodies established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/200823 . |
| 23 Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93, OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30–47 | 23 Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93, OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30–47 |
Or. en
Amendment 319
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) Organisers transporting animals to a place of destination in a third country must arrange an evaluation of the first journey by a certification body in order to determine the organiser’s ability to ensure compliance with this Regulation until the arrival of the animals at the place of destination in the third country. If the conditions laid down in this Regulation are not fulfilled, the competent authority should suspend the organiser’s authorisation with respect to transport to third countries. The certification body should regularly evaluate journeys to third countries arranged by the organiser with a view to determining continues to have the means to comply with this Regulation. Certification bodies should have the required knowledge and qualifications, provide guarantees of continued independence from organisers, transporters and any other person or entity involved in the transport or handling of animals during transport and should be accredited by national accreditation bodies established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/200823 . | (43) The competent authority of the Member State of the place of departure should arrange for a certification body to evaluate the journey to a place of destination in a third country in order to determine the organiser’s ability to ensure compliance with this Regulation until the arrival of the animals at the place of destination in the third country. If the conditions laid down in this Regulation are not fulfilled, the competent authority should suspend the organiser’s authorisation with respect to transport to third countries. The certification body should regularly evaluate journeys to third countries arranged by the organiser with a view to determining continues to have the means to comply with this Regulation. Certification bodies should have the required knowledge and qualifications, provide guarantees of continued independence from organisers, transporters and any other person or entity involved in the transport or handling of animals during transport and should be accredited by national accreditation bodies established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/200823 . |
| 23 Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93, OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30–47 | 23 Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93, OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30–47 |
Or. en
Amendment 320
Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Hayer
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43 a) It is crucial to safeguard not only the well-being of animals but also of drivers during animal transport. Rules governing the duration of animal transport should align with the regulatory framework on maximum daily driving times for truck drivers, as set forth in Regulation (EC) 561/2006. In particular, the time spent on loading and unloading should be treated as working hours for the driver, rather than rest time, to ensure compliance with driving time limits and promote road safety. |
Or. en
Amendment 321
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (44) Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/9724 establishes requirements for control posts and on the use of these control posts in the Union. To ensure that the transport of animals from the Union to third countries complies with this Regulation in particular as regards journey times, rest periods and the conditions of accommodation of the animals during rest periods, control posts in third countries should meet equivalent standards to those laid down in Union legislation, in particular Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97. | (44) Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/9724 establishes requirements for control posts and on the use of these control posts in the Union. To ensure that the transport of animals from the Union to third countries complies with this Regulation in particular as regards journey times, rest periods and the conditions of accommodation of the animals during rest periods, control posts in third countries should meet equivalent standards to those laid down in Union legislation, in particular Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97. There is however a lack of coherent data collection and reporting from third countries, which complicates the verification of the fulfilment of these requirements. |
| 24 Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 of 25 June 1997 concerning Community criteria for staging points and amending the route plan referred to in the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC, OJ L 174, 2.7.1997, p. 1–6. | 24 Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 of 25 June 1997 concerning Community criteria for staging points and amending the route plan referred to in the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC, OJ L 174, 2.7.1997, p. 1–6. |
Or. en
Amendment 322
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (45) Operators of control posts in third countries or organisers may request their inclusion in a list to be adopted by the Commission provided they demonstrate compliance with requirements at least equivalent to the Union rules, in particular Regulation (EC) No 1255/97. For this purpose, control posts in third countries may provide proof of certification of compliance with requirements at least equivalent to those laid down in Union law, in particular Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 by a certification body. The list of approved control posts in third countries should be adopted by the Commission by means of implementing acts. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 323
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (45) Operators of control posts in third countries or organisers may request their inclusion in a list to be adopted by the Commission provided they demonstrate compliance with requirements at least equivalent to the Union rules, in particular Regulation (EC) No 1255/97. For this purpose, control posts in third countries may provide proof of certification of compliance with requirements at least equivalent to those laid down in Union law, in particular Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 by a certification body. The list of approved control posts in third countries should be adopted by the Commission by means of implementing acts. | (45) Operators of control posts in third countries or organisers may request their inclusion in a list to be adopted by the Commission provided they demonstrate compliance with requirements at least equivalent to the Union rules, in particular Regulation (EC) No 1255/97. For this purpose, control posts in third countries may provide proof of certification of compliance with requirements at least equivalent to those laid down in Union law, in particular Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 by a certification body. The list of approved control posts in third countries should be adopted by the Commission by means of delegated acts. |
Or. en
Amendment 324
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (46) To better ensure that control posts meet the needs of the animals resting at their premises, these should be adapted to the relevant species and categories. A booking system should be put in place to avoid delays or overbooking of control posts. Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 should be amended accordingly. | (46) Control posts should meet the needs of the animals resting at their premises, but are not adapted to the relevant species and categories and there is no booking system in place to avoid delays or overbooking of control posts. Therefore, as long as Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 does not fully guarantee the welfare of animals until the place of destination, transport to third countries should not be allowed. |
Or. en
Amendment 325
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (46) To better ensure that control posts meet the needs of the animals resting at their premises, these should be adapted to the relevant species and categories. A booking system should be put in place to avoid delays or overbooking of control posts. Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 should be amended accordingly. | (46) To better ensure that control posts meet the needs of the animals resting at their premises, the establishment of a booking system is recommended to avoid delays or overbooking of control posts. Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 should be amended accordingly. |
Or. en
Amendment 326
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (46) To better ensure that control posts meet the needs of the animals resting at their premises, these should be adapted to the relevant species and categories. A booking system should be put in place to avoid delays or overbooking of control posts. Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 should be amended accordingly. | (46) To better ensure that control posts meet the needs of the animals resting at their premises. Thus, the establishment of a booking system is recommended to avoid delays or overbooking of control posts. Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 should be amended accordingly. |
Or. en
Amendment 327
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (47) Experience shows that the designation of an exit point in the Union is important for ensuring the smooth transport of live animals from the Union to third countries. Animals should leave the Union through designated exit points that meet the necessary requirements for animal welfare checks as referred to in Article 21(2), point (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/62525 and are capable of ensuring communication between competent authorities at places of departure, assembly centres, control posts and establishments of destination in this regard. Competent authorities should record such designations in TRACES. | (47) Experience shows that the designation of an exit point in the Union is important for ensuring the smooth transport of live animals from the Union to third countries. Animals should leave the Union through designated exit points that meet the necessary requirements for animal welfare checks as referred to in Article 21(2), point (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/62525 and are capable of ensuring communication between competent authorities at places of departure, assembly centres, control posts and establishments of destination in this regard. Competent authorities should record such designations in TRACES. Furthermore, the exit points should have adequate facilities in terms of loading and unloading equipment, non-slip flooring, suitable lighting, and shelter to protect animals from adverse weather conditions, and provisions for feeding, watering, and resting animals, and facilities should have isolation areas for sick or injured animals, and implement cleaning and disinfection protocols for vehicles and holding areas. |
| 25 Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, amending Regulations (EC) No 999/2001, (EC) No 396/2005, (EC) No 1069/2009, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 1151/2012, (EU) No 652/2014, (EU) 2016/429 and (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 1/2005 and (EC) No 1099/2009 and Council Directives 98/58/EC, 1999/74/EC, 2007/43/EC, 2008/119/EC and 2008/120/EC, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 854/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 89/608/EEC, 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 96/23/EC, 96/93/EC and 97/78/EC and Council Decision 92/438/EEC (Official Controls Regulation) OJ L 95, 7.4.2017, p. 1–142 | 25 Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, amending Regulations (EC) No 999/2001, (EC) No 396/2005, (EC) No 1069/2009, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 1151/2012, (EU) No 652/2014, (EU) 2016/429 and (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 1/2005 and (EC) No 1099/2009 and Council Directives 98/58/EC, 1999/74/EC, 2007/43/EC, 2008/119/EC and 2008/120/EC, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 854/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 89/608/EEC, 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 96/23/EC, 96/93/EC and 97/78/EC and Council Decision 92/438/EEC (Official Controls Regulation) OJ L 95, 7.4.2017, p. 1–142 |
Or. en
Amendment 328
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (47 a) On border crossings to third countries, fast lanes should be established to ensure a smooth and timely processing of live animal transport vehicles. |
Or. en
Amendment 329
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. | (48) Experience has shown that consignments of animals transported to third countries by land and sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this seriously affects the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should not approve these journeys. |
Or. en
Amendment 330
Arash Saeidi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. | (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported in third countries may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals signed by the competent authority of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. |
Or. fr
Amendment 331
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. | (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea or road or rail may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates or guarantees of acceptance by the consignee. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea or road or rail signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination and veterinary administration of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. |
Or. en
Amendment 332
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. | (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea or road may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea or road signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. A guarantee of acceptance by the consignee is essential for transports to third countries, including a guarantee that the animals will not be blocked at an external border of the EU. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. |
Or. en
Amendment 333
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. | (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by road or sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by road or sea signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. |
Or. en
Amendment 334
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. | (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by land and by sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. |
Or. en
Amendment 335
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea signed by the competent authority of the seaport of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. | (48) Experience has shown that there is a risk that consignments of animals transported by sea or road may be rejected by the country of destination on the basis of the documents presented, for example, health certificates. In certain cases, this may affect the welfare of the animals, as they cannot be returned to the place of departure for animal health reasons. The competent authorities at the place of departure should approve a journey log only when the operators provide them with an attestation of acceptance of documentation for the international transport of live animals by sea or road signed by the competent authority of the country of final destination. Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish a model attestation. |
Or. en
Amendment 336
Michal Wiezik, Valérie Hayer, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (48 a) In order to ensure a level-playing field for animals and goods produced from animals placed on the EU market, the Commission should make use of the empowerment foreseen in article 126 of the Regulation on official controls, and especially its paragraph 2(c), to include all elements on protection of animals during transports in the scope of imports controls and certificates. |
Or. en
Amendment 337
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. | (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied in a consistent manner across the Union. Repeated infringements should be considered more serious to deter non-compliance and strengthen enforcement. |
Or. en
Amendment 338
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. | (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. |
Or. en
Amendment 339
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. | (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 340
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. | (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The Commission should be empowered to adopt an implementing act, in accordance with Article 49 of this regulation, in order to develop an EU harmonised infringement system to be applied by Member States every time a violation is detected. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. The financial benefits gained due to the infringement, and any other aggravating or mitigating factors applicable to the circumstances of the case, should also be taken into account. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 341
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. | (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The European Commission should be empowered to adopt an implementing act, in accordance with article 49 of this regulation, in order to develop an EU harmonised infringement system to be applied by Member States every time a violation is detected. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 342
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. | (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. In order to prevent bypassing of certain Member States on the basis of differing severity of the penalties imposed, harmonised EU infringement system should be applied by Member States. |
Or. en
Amendment 343
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. | (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. To ensure the deterrence of sanctions, Member States should apply a system whereby a financial penalty is imposed which is calculated as at least 10% of the turnover of the operator being held liable for the infringement. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 344
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare and establish minimum levels of financial penalties in relation to the value of animal consignments in such cases. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. | (49) Member States should lay down effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties for infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are applied. To ensure a consistent and effective application of this Regulation across the Union, it is necessary to avoid different levels of enforcement and that the differing severity of the penalties applied for non-compliance with this Regulation in different Member States leads to transport operations being planned in accordance with the lesser severity of the penalties imposed in certain Member States. It is appropriate to identify those infringements of this Regulation that cause significant risks to animal welfare. The degree of frequency of occurrence of the infringement should also be a factor and repeated infringements should be regarded as more serious. This should deter future infringements and improve the enforcement of the Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 345
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (50) The Fitness Check of the EU animal welfare legislation has shown difficulties in assessing the effectiveness of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 in improving animal welfare due to the lack of indicators provided for in that Regulation. It is appropriate to create a system of monitoring of animal welfare indicators. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 346
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (50) The Fitness Check of the EU animal welfare legislation has shown difficulties in assessing the effectiveness of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 in improving animal welfare due to the lack of indicators provided for in that Regulation. It is appropriate to create a system of monitoring of animal welfare indicators. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 347
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (50) The Fitness Check of the EU animal welfare legislation has shown difficulties in assessing the effectiveness of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 in improving animal welfare due to the lack of indicators provided for in that Regulation. It is appropriate to create a system of monitoring of animal welfare indicators. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 348
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (50) The Fitness Check of the EU animal welfare legislation has shown difficulties in assessing the effectiveness of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 in improving animal welfare due to the lack of indicators provided for in that Regulation. It is appropriate to create a system of monitoring of animal welfare indicators. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 349
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (50) The Fitness Check of the EU animal welfare legislation has shown difficulties in assessing the effectiveness of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 in improving animal welfare due to the lack of indicators provided for in that Regulation. It is appropriate to create a system of monitoring of animal welfare indicators. | (50) The Fitness Check of the EU animal welfare legislation has shown difficulties in assessing the effectiveness of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 in improving animal welfare due to the lack of indicators provided for in that Regulation. It is appropriate to create a system of monitoring of animal welfare indicators, internal air quality and and internal hygiene conditions. |
Or. en
Amendment 350
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 351
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 352
Salvatore De Meo, Flavio Tosi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES. | (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of a summary assessment of welfare carried out by the consignee. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on the summary assessment should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES. |
Or. it
Amendment 353
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES. | (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities in a harmonized format at EU level. |
Or. en
Amendment 354
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES. | (51) Transporters and animal keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and animal keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available, where applicable, to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES in a harmonised format at EU level, after anonymisation of the personal and business sensitive company data. |
Or. en
Amendment 355
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES. | (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES on request to competent authorities and in anonymised format to the Commission. |
Or. en
Amendment 356
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Emma Wiesner, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (51) Transporters and keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES. | (51) Transporters and animal keepers should be required to collect data on the basis of animal welfare indicators relevant to their transport activities. Analysis of the data will allow transporters and animal keepers to identify deficiencies in relation to animal welfare and to put in place appropriate corrective measures when needed. Data on indicators should also be made available to competent authorities and to the Commission in TRACES. |
Or. en
Amendment 357
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (52) In order to update the technical rules in Chapters I, II, V and VII of Annex I and Annex II, to align these rules to the latest scientific and technical knowledge when these are available, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission. In order to facilitate proper implementation of this Regulation, the power to adopt, in accordance with Article 290 TFEU, acts to update the model of journey log in Annex III and the model of attestation in Annex IV should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultation during its preparatory work including at expert level and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 of April 2016 on Better Law-Making26 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of the Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. | deleted |
| 26 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making, OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1–14 |
Or. en
Amendment 358
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (52) In order to update the technical rules in Chapters I, II, V and VII of Annex I and Annex II, to align these rules to the latest scientific and technical knowledge when these are available, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission. In order to facilitate proper implementation of this Regulation, the power to adopt, in accordance with Article 290 TFEU, acts to update the model of journey log in Annex III and the model of attestation in Annex IV should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultation during its preparatory work including at expert level and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 of April 2016 on Better Law-Making26 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of the Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. | (52) In order to update the technical rules in Chapters I, II, V and VII of Annex I and Annex II, to align these rules to the latest scientific, technical, verifiable knowledge and practical experience when these are available, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission. In order to facilitate proper implementation of this Regulation, the power to adopt, in accordance with Article 290 TFEU, acts to update the model of journey log in Annex III and the model of attestation in Annex IV should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultation with relevant stakeholders during its preparatory work including at expert level and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 of April 2016 on Better Law-Making26 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of the Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. |
| 26 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making, OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1–14 | 26 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making, OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1–14 |
Or. en
Amendment 359
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (52) In order to update the technical rules in Chapters I, II, V and VII of Annex I and Annex II, to align these rules to the latest scientific and technical knowledge when these are available, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission. In order to facilitate proper implementation of this Regulation, the power to adopt, in accordance with Article 290 TFEU, acts to update the model of journey log in Annex III and the model of attestation in Annex IV should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultation during its preparatory work including at expert level and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 of April 2016 on Better Law-Making26 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of the Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. | (52) In order to update the technical rules in Chapters I and II of Annex I, and Annex II, to align these rules to the latest scientific and technical knowledge when these are available, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission. In order to facilitate proper implementation of this Regulation, the power to adopt, in accordance with Article 290 TFEU, acts to update the model of journey log in Annex III and the model of attestation in Annex IV should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultation during its preparatory work including at expert level and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 of April 2016 on Better Law-Making26 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of the Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. |
| 26 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making, OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1–14 | 26 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making, OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1–14 |
Or. en
Amendment 360
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (52 a) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation with regard to the updating of the model record sheet set out in Annex III and of the model certificate set out in Annex IV, the Commission should be granted delegated powers. These powers should be exercised in accordance with Article 290 TFEU. |
Or. en
Amendment 361
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . | (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . |
| 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. | 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. |
Or. en
Amendment 362
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . | (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . |
| 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. | 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. |
Or. en
Amendment 363
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . | (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES and its interoperability, the power to adopt acts in accordance with article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission. |
| 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. |
Or. en
Amendment 364
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . | (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned and weaned animals on board, the approval of internal ambient air temperature control systems, the approval of thermometers and hygrometers, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare, air quality and internal hygiene indicators, and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . |
| 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. | 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. |
Or. en
Amendment 365
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . | (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, an EU harmonised infringement system, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . |
| 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. | 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. |
Or. en
Amendment 366
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . | (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES and harmonised EU infringement system, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . |
| 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. | 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. |
Or. en
Amendment 367
Arash Saeidi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, and technical rules on the use of TRACES, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27. | (53) To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, including elements of contingency plans and their templates, technical rules concerning approval of livestock vessels, the technical elements needed to set up the live tracking navigation system recordings, the approval of feeding systems for unweaned animals on board, the content of the evaluations needed for the certification of organisers transporting animals to third countries and the frequency by which they are needed, the lists of control posts meeting equivalent standards to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 and definitions of welfare indicators and the methods to monitor them, technical rules on the use of TRACES, and a harmonised penalty system, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council27. |
| 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. | 27 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13–18. |
Or. fr
Amendment 368
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (54) It is important to ensure that national rules are not used by Member States in a way to prejudice the correct application of the provisions of this Regulation or to affect the functioning of the internal market. Member States should notify the Commission of any such national rules. The Commission should bring them to the attention of other Member States. Where national rules fall within the scope of Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council, they should be notified to the Commission in accordance with that Directive. | (54) It is important to ensure that national rules are not used by Member States in a way to prejudice the correct application of the provisions of this Regulation. Stricter national rules should be allowed, regardless of whether it could have a possible effect on the functioning of the internal market, as long as it would improve animal welfare during transport. Member States should notify the Commission of any such national rules. The Commission should bring them to the attention of other Member States. Where national rules fall within the scope of Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council, they should be notified to the Commission in accordance with that Directive. |
Or. en
Amendment 369
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times and feeding of unweaned animals during transport will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks to provide more space for the animals and possibly new feeding systems. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. | (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules will require changes in transport patterns. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 370
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times and feeding of unweaned animals during transport will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks to provide more space for the animals and possibly new feeding systems. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. | (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning travel time will require changes in transport patterns and investments in new trucks. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 371
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times and feeding of unweaned animals during transport will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks to provide more space for the animals and possibly new feeding systems. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. | (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 372
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times and feeding of unweaned animals during transport will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks to provide more space for the animals and possibly new feeding systems. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. | (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times during transport may require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks, where necessary. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 373
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times and feeding of unweaned animals during transport will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks to provide more space for the animals and possibly new feeding systems. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. | (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning the limitation of journey times, and prohibiting sea transport, the transport of animals to third countries and the transport of unweaned animals, will require changes. However, this Regulation should not provide for long transition periods that allow the operators concerned to postpone or avoid the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 374
Csaba Dömötör
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times and feeding of unweaned animals during transport will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks to provide more space for the animals and possibly new feeding systems. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. | (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times and feeding of unweaned animals during transport will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks to provide more space for the animals and possibly new feeding systems. Since the cost of these new investments will inevitably be passed on to consumers through higher prices, no such investment shall be made obligatory by this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 375
Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella, Matteo Ricci
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times and feeding of unweaned animals during transport will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks to provide more space for the animals and possibly new feeding systems. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. | (55) The impact assessment performed to prepare this Regulation indicates that some of the new requirements set out in this Regulation call for planning and investment from the operators impacted by them. New rules concerning journey times and feeding of unweaned animals during transport will require changes in transport patterns, and investments in new trucks to provide more space for the animals and possibly new feeding systems. Accordingly, this Regulation should provide for appropriate levels of support and transition periods to take into account the necessary time to allow the operators concerned to adapt to the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation. |
Or. it
Amendment 376
Arash Saeidi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (55a) The development of slaughter infrastructures is a vital tool in reducing journey times for animals. It is particularly important to strengthen these infrastructures, including mobile slaughter units, in rural and remote regions in order to minimise the transport of live animals and foster an approach that ensures greater respect for animal welfare and health and environmental requirements. It is essential to put in place a harmonised regulatory framework and appropriate incentives to ensure that these infrastructures are effective and economically viable in all the Member States. |
Or. fr
Amendment 377
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (56) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to ensure a harmonised approach with regard to the protection of animals during transport, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale, effects, and trans-border and international characters of the transport, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective. | (56) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to ensure a harmonised approach with regard to the protection of animals during transport, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale, effects, and trans-border and international characters of the transport, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, which should not affect the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective. |
Or. en
Amendment 378
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (56) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to ensure a harmonised approach with regard to the protection of animals during transport, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale, effects, and trans-border and international characters of the transport, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective. | (56) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to ensure a harmonised approach with regard to the protection of animals during transport, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale, effects, and trans-border and international characters of the transport, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, with due respect to the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective. |
Or. en
Amendment 379
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (56 a) The reporting and review of this Regulation shall also assess its effectiveness in prioritising the slaughter of animals locally or via mobile slaughterhouses, and reducing and replacing as far as possible the transport of live animals with the transport of carcasses and meat, or genetic material. |
Or. en
Amendment 380
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (57) “The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and delivered an opinion on [DD/MM/YYYY].” | (57) “The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and delivered an opinion on 05/03/2024.” |
Or. en
Amendment 381
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (57 a) Since the European Commission is making efforts to mitigate the lack of drivers in the whole European Union, where 400.000 professionals were needed in the heavy-duty vehicle sector in 2024 alone according to the Draghi Report, the Union may not adopt measures which further aggravate this issue. |
Or. en
Amendment 382
Milan Mazurek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| This Regulation lays down rules for the protection of animals during transport in connection with an economic activity. | This Regulation lays down rules for the protection of animals during transport in connection with an economic activity, taking into account the specific characteristics of each Member State and their agricultural traditions. |
Or. sk
Amendment 383
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| This Regulation lays down rules for the protection of animals during transport in connection with an economic activity. | This Regulation lays down rules for the protection of animals and their welfare and health during transport in connection with an economic activity. |
Or. en
Amendment 384
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| This Regulation lays down rules for the protection of animals during transport in connection with an economic activity. | This Regulation lays down rules for the protection of animals of specified species during transport in connection with an economic activity. |
Or. en
Amendment 385
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. This Regulation shall apply to the transport of animals: | 1. The Regulation should only apply to the transport of live vertebrate animals for commercial purpose. Transport for commercial purposes is not limited to transport where an immediate exchange of money, goods or services takes place. Transport for commercial purposes includes, in particular, transport which directly or indirectly involves or aims at a financial gain. |
Or. en
Amendment 386
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – within the Union; | – within the Union and its offshores waters; |
Or. en
Amendment 387
Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – within the Union; | – within the Union and its offshore waters; |
Or. en
Amendment 388
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals for the purpose of seasonal transhumance or the exploitation of natural, forestry or agricultural resources; |
Or. en
Amendment 389
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals for the purpose of seasonal transhumance or the use of natural, forestry or agricultural resources; |
Or. es
Justification
It is often preferable for farmers to use contracted services, neighbours or borrowed vehicles to move animals destined for transhumance from their farms. Requiring full compliance when animals are not transported using farmers' 'own means of transport' would be unjustified and unnecessarily burdensome, as most animals transported by contractors or neighbours arrive safely at their destination.
Amendment 390
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance or the use of natural, forestry or agricultural resources; |
Or. en
Amendment 391
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy , Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. fr
Amendment 392
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. en
Amendment 393
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. en
Amendment 394
Jessica Polfjärd, Tomas Tobé
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. en
Amendment 395
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. en
Amendment 396
Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella, Matteo Ricci
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. it
Amendment 397
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point α
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. el
Amendment 398
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of animals using their own or other means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. en
Justification
For small-scale farming (and professional horse keeping), it is important that animals belonging to others can also be transported to the pasture using borrowed means of transport. Many farmers also use contracting services or neighbours to move animals for transhumance.
Amendment 399
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers, owners or producers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. en
Amendment 400
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; | (a) transport by farmers of their own animals using means of transport for the purpose of seasonal transhumance; |
Or. ro
Amendment 401
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance. |
Or. en
Amendment 402
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km. |
Or. en
Amendment 403
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km. |
Or. es
Justification
The distance of 50 km should be increased, as this figure discriminates against remote farms that are further from auction houses and slaughterhouses. What is more, Annex 1, Chapter 1, paragraph 1(h) sets the maximum transport distance for sentient animals at 100 km.
Amendment 404
Marko Vešligaj
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km. |
Or. en
Amendment 405
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km. |
Or. en
Amendment 406
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point β
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km; |
Or. el
Amendment 407
Markus Ferber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. the rule applies by analogy to transport in the context of fisheries and aquaculture. |
Or. de
Justification
Animal transport is also carried out in the context of fisheries and pond farming. The limitation of the scope of the Regulation for farmers should be applied by analogy to fisheries and aquaculture businesses.
Amendment 408
Stefan Köhler, Jens Gieseke, Lena Düpont, Marion Walsmann, Christine Schneider, Norbert Lins, Alexandra Mehnert
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. the rule applies by analogy to transport in the context of fisheries and aquaculture; |
Or. de
Amendment 409
Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept . For aquatic animals, Annex II shall apply. |
Or. en
Amendment 410
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, where the entire journey is a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. en
Amendment 411
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers, owners and producers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. en
Amendment 412
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy , Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. fr
Amendment 413
Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a journey time of no more than nine hours from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. en
Justification
We have serious concerns about the proposed restriction limiting livestock transport to a maximum of 100km from farm to slaughterhouse. While well-intentioned from an animal welfare perspective, such a measure fails to consider the geographical realities of Ireland’s agri-food infrastructure and risks creating significant market distortions.
Amendment 414
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own or other means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. en
Justification
Small farms should have the possibility to borrow transport vehicles from one another, provided that cleaning and disinfection are carried out after each use.
Amendment 415
Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 250 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. en
Amendment 416
Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 500 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. fr
Amendment 417
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 150 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. en
Amendment 418
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. en
Amendment 419
Jessica Polfjärd, Tomas Tobé
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. en
Amendment 420
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 25 km from the holding in which they are kept. |
Or. en
Amendment 421
Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella, Matteo Ricci
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km from the holding in which they are kept; |
Or. it
Amendment 422
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using a means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 150 km from the holding in which they are kept; |
Or. en
Amendment 423
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 100 km from the holding in which they are kept; |
Or. ro
Justification
For the sake of consistency with Annex I, Chapter 1, Point (1)(h), under which vulnerable animals can be transported for a distance of up to 100 km.
Amendment 424
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) transport by farmers of their own animals using their own means of transport for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of no more than 50 km from the holding in which they are kept. | (b) transport by farmers of their own animals for purposes other than transhumance, for a distance of up to 100 km from the holding in which they are kept, including aquatic animals. |
Or. en
Amendment 425
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) horses transported for breeding or rearing purposes, or to or from auctions organised by approved houses. |
Or. en
Amendment 426
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 427
Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 428
Borja Giménez Larraz, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, horse races, cultural events, circuses, and sport and leisure activities, wildlife management activities, equidae transported for breeding or rearing purposes, or to or from auctions orgnaised by approved houses; |
Or. en
Amendment 429
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and sport and leisure activities; |
Or. es
Justification
All sport and leisure activities should be taken into account, not just those involving horses.
Amendment 430
Nina Carberry, Maria Walsh, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, horse races, cultural events, circuses, equestrian sport and leisure activities; equidae transported for breeding or rearing purposes, or to or from auctions orgnaised by approved houses. |
Or. en
Amendment 431
Milan Mazurek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities, provided that such transport is not considered commercial and is exempt from the registration requirements under Article 15; |
Or. sk
Amendment 432
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | (c) transport of animals by the owner on is means of transport for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; |
Or. en
Amendment 433
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, horse races, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport, leisure or hunting activities. |
Or. fr
Amendment 434
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, wildlife management activities and equestrian sport and leisure activities; |
Or. en
Amendment 435
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport and leisure activities; | (c) transport of animals for the purposes of participating in training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses, and equestrian sport such as horse racing and leisure activities; |
Or. en
Amendment 436
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy , Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ca) transport by farmers of their own pregnant females for whom 90 % or more of the expected gestation period has already passed, females that have just given birth or new-born animals, if transporting them from a field to a stable/holding or from one field to another. |
Or. fr
Amendment 437
Philippe Olivier, Valérie Deloge, Julien Leonardelli, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ca) transport of equidae for breeding or rearing purposes, or to or from auctions organised by approved houses. |
Or. fr
Justification
Les ventes aux enchères sont organisées par des maisons de vente agréées, pour lesquelles une attention particulière est portée au bien-être des équidés transportés, avec des exigences telles que des tests sanitaires et des certificats vétérinaires.Les activités d'élevage et de reproduction sont organisées en fonction du cycle reproductif de la jumentet nécessitent une certaine réactivité de la part des éleveurs et des centres de reproduction. Les règlesprévues dans la proposition de règlement sont trop contraignantes pour ce type d'activité quinécessite de pourvoir déplacer les juments et/ou les poulains rapidement pour garantir leur bien-êtreet leur sécurité.
Amendment 438
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) transport by livestock farmers of their own animals in advanced gestation or recently calved or born from the grazing fields to the stables or farms; |
Or. en
Amendment 439
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) the transport of protected species, under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)27a | |
| 27a Council Decision (EU) 2015/451 of 6 March 2015 concerning the accession of the European Union to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), OJ L 75, 19.3.2015, p. 1–3. |
Or. en
Amendment 440
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Emma Wiesner, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) transport of equine animals for the purpose of breeding or to and from auctions organized by accredited auction houses; |
Or. en
Amendment 441
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ca) transport of animals to assembly centres that are no further than 100 km away; |
Or. es
Justification
The transport of animals to assembly centres is considered a low-risk journey. For logistical reasons, animals have to be transported from different points, which is why the journey, for the purposes of this regulation, should start at the assembly centre and not at each of the animals' points of origin. Given that there is no 'journey' between the farm of origin and the assembly centre, we are proposing that this exception be included.
Amendment 442
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ca) live embryos, larvae and eggs of aquatic animals. |
Or. fr
Justification
It must be clear that these stages of development are excluded from the scope of the Regulation.
Amendment 443
Merja Kyllönen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
2023/0448(COD)
Article 2, point 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) transport of kept reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus; |
Or. en
Justification
According to the subsidiarity principle, regulating at the EU level is justified if this is more efficient than regulating at the national level. Reindeer herding is applicable only to Finland and Sweden. Therefore, regulation at EU-level is not justified. In addition, reindeer herding is a very specialized livelihood compared to all the other forms of animal production sectors and is also integral part of Sami culture. Reindeer have adapted well to the cold climate, and the graze freely most of the year.
Amendment 444
Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) transport of all horses, except for horses for slaughter. |
Or. en
Amendment 445
Sander Smit, Jessika Van Leeuwen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) transport of all horses, except for horses for slaughter |
Or. en
Amendment 446
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ca) transport of registered breeding horses. |
Or. ro
Justification
Registered breeding horses should enjoy separate treatment befitting their specific needs owing to their high market value. This separate treatment goes beyond the minimum standards set in this Regulation.
Amendment 447
Emma Wiesner, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) transport preformed for evacuation. |
Or. en
Amendment 448
Pekka Toveri
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) (d) transport of kept reindeer |
Or. en
Amendment 449
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (cb) transport by farmers of their own heavily pregnant or newly calved or born animals, from grazing fields to stables/a holding. |
Or. es
Justification
On some farms, animals continue to graze until they give birth or are heavily pregnant. In those cases, it may be necessary to transport the animals from grazing sites to stables to ensure their welfare or veterinary assistance.
Amendment 450
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy , Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (cb) transport by farmers of their own animals to certified fairs or markets for sale. |
Or. fr
Amendment 451
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c b) the transport of animals between zoos as defined in Article 2 of Council Directive 1999/22/EC27b | |
| 27b Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, OJ L 94, 9.4.1999, p. 24–26. |
Or. en
Amendment 452
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Emma Wiesner, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c b) transport of kept reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus; |
Or. en
Amendment 453
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c b) transport of horses, except transport to slaughter. |
Or. en
Amendment 454
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy , Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (cc) transport of equidae for breeding or rearing purposes, or to or from auctions organised by approved houses. |
Or. fr
Amendment 455
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c c) the transport of ornamental fish; |
Or. en
Amendment 456
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c d (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c d) direct deliveries of aquatic animals to food businesses supplying the final consumer. |
Or. en
Amendment 457
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2 a. transport of hard-to-handle animals, characterised by fierce and unpredictable behaviour, which require a specific approach to transport in order to ensure their well-being. |
Or. en
Amendment 458
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2 a. d) the transport of animals to concentration centres located at a distance of no more than 100 km. |
Or. en
Amendment 459
Jessica Polfjärd, Tomas Tobé
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2 a. Transport of all horses, except horses being transported for slaughter. |
Or. en
Amendment 460
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2 b. e) Transportation by livestock farmers of their own animals in an advanced state of pregnancy or recently delivered or born from the grazing fields to the stables/farm. |
Or. en
Amendment 461
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2 c. The transport of animals which, because of their specific characteristics, morphology, breed or dangerousness, are subject to specific legislation in a Member State, provided that such legislation is properly designed to ensure appropriate transport conditions, to achieve animal welfare, and to take account of the particularities of the animals. |
Or. en
Amendment 462
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Emma Wiesner, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the transport of animals which does not take place in connection with an economic activity; | (a) the transport of animals which does not take place in connection with an economic activity, notably non-professional equine activities and amateur activities; |
Or. en
Amendment 463
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the transport of animals which does not take place in connection with an economic activity; | (a) the transport of animals which is not for commercial purpose; |
Or. en
Amendment 464
Bert-Jan Ruissen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a a) transport by farmers of their own animals that are either highly pregnant (over 90%), that just gave birth or neonates from grazing fields to the stables/holding. |
Or. en
Amendment 465
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy , Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) the transport of animals by individuals on private journeys; |
Or. fr
Amendment 466
Bert-Jan Ruissen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a b) transport of horses, except for horses for slaughter; |
Or. en
Amendment 467
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) transport by farmers of their own animals that are at an advanced stage of gestation, have just given birth or are newborns from grazing fields to stables or holdings |
Or. en
Amendment 468
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the transport of protected species, under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)28 ; | deleted |
| 28 Council Decision (EU) 2015/451 of 6 March 2015 concerning the accession of the European Union to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), OJ L 75, 19.3.2015, p. 1–3. |
Or. en
Amendment 469
Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the transport of protected species, under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)28 ; | deleted |
| 28 Council Decision (EU) 2015/451 of 6 March 2015 concerning the accession of the European Union to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), OJ L 75, 19.3.2015, p. 1–3. |
Or. en
Amendment 470
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the transport of protected species, under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)28 ; | deleted |
| 28 Council Decision (EU) 2015/451 of 6 March 2015 concerning the accession of the European Union to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), OJ L 75, 19.3.2015, p. 1–3. |
Or. en
Amendment 471
Annalisa Corrado, Maria Noichl
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) the emergency evacuation or movement of an animal for rescue purposes; |
Or. en
Amendment 472
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the transport of animals between zoos as defined in Article 2 of Council Directive 1999/22/EC29. | deleted |
| 29 Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, OJ L 94, 9.4.1999, p. 24–26. |
Or. es
Justification
Transport of that kind is connected to an economic activity. It should not be excluded.
Amendment 473
Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the transport of animals between zoos as defined in Article 2 of Council Directive 1999/22/EC29 . | deleted |
| 29 Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, OJ L 94, 9.4.1999, p. 24–26. |
Or. en
Amendment 474
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the transport of animals between zoos as defined in Article 2 of Council Directive 1999/22/EC29 . | deleted |
| 29 Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, OJ L 94, 9.4.1999, p. 24–26. |
Or. en
Amendment 475
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the transport of animals between zoos as defined in Article 2 of Council Directive 1999/22/EC29 . | deleted |
| 29 Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, OJ L 94, 9.4.1999, p. 24–26. |
Or. en
Amendment 476
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d – point i (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| i) The transport of animals by the owner on his means for transport for leaisure activities; |
Or. en
Amendment 477
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) the transport of ornamental fish; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 478
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) the transport of ornamental fish; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 479
Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) the transport of ornamental fish; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 480
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) direct deliveries of aquatic animals to food businesses supplying the final consumer. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 481
Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) direct deliveries of aquatic animals to food businesses supplying the final consumer. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 482
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) direct deliveries of aquatic animals to food businesses supplying the final consumer. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 483
Sander Smit, Jessika Van Leeuwen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) direct deliveries of aquatic animals to food businesses supplying the final consumer. | (f) direct deliveries to food businesses supplying the final consumer. |
Or. en
Amendment 484
Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) direct deliveries of aquatic animals to food businesses supplying the final consumer. | (f) direct deliveries to food businesses supplying the final consumer. |
Or. en
Amendment 485
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) direct deliveries of aquatic animals to food businesses supplying the final consumer. | (f) direct deliveries of aquatic animals to food businesses supplying the final consumer or direct delivery of aquatic animals to the final consumer; |
Or. en
Amendment 486
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f a) the transport of fish for stocking purposes (e.g. open waters for fishing) by the respective manager. |
Or. en
Justification
The stocking of fish in bodies of water by the respective owner/manager should explicitly not fall under the regulation, as it does not constitute a commercial transport.
Amendment 487
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f a) dogs used in traditional hunting methods |
Or. en
Amendment 488
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f d (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f d) dogs used in traditional hunting methods; |
Or. en
Amendment 489
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f a) live embryos, larvae and eggs of aquatic animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 490
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f b) live embryos, larvae and eggs of aquatic animals |
Or. en
Amendment 491
Krzysztof Hetman
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (fa) transport of embryos, larvae and fish eggs. |
Or. pl
Amendment 492
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f b) the transport of animals for the purpose of restoring or regulating a species or an ecosystem; |
Or. en
Amendment 493
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f c) animal transport of aquatic animals through primary production dedicated vessels, vessels used in aquaculture and extractive fishing, nursery boats and tank boats; |
Or. en
Amendment 494
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f c) transport of kept reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus; |
Or. en
Justification
Reindeer herding is applicable only to Finland and Sweden, and therefore, according to the subsidiarity principle, an EU regulation is not justified. Furthermore, reindeer herding is a very specialized livelihood and also an integral part of Sámi culture. Reindeer are very well adapted to the cold climate, and they graze freely for most of the year.
Amendment 495
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point f e (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f e) transport of kept reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus. |
Or. en
Amendment 496
Annalisa Corrado, Maria Noichl
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3 a. For the purpose of this Regulation, the concept of "protection of animals" covers both animal health and welfare, while recognising its interplay with human health and wellbeing, environmental protection, and food safety, according to the One Health approach. |
Or. en
Amendment 497
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3 a. the transport of animals for training, exhibitions, competitions, cultural events, circuses and equestrian, hunting, sporting and leisure activities |
Or. en
Amendment 498
Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3 b. Exemptions may be granted when necessary for the transport of animals for scientific purposes. However, before any exemption is approved, the competent authority should conduct a thorough and critical assessment to evaluate the genuine need and justification for transporting each category of 'unfit' animals for scientific purposes. |
Or. en
Amendment 499
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Articles 4(2)(b), 20, 26, Chapters I and V of Annex I and point 4 of Annex II shall not apply to transport of animals for the purposes of an authorised project under Directive 2010/63/EU30 . | deleted |
| 30 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33–79. |
Or. en
Justification
Such animals should be fit for the entire journey and monitoring indicators should be used for this purpose; and rules on journey times, temperatures, rest periods and watering/feeding should also be covered.
Amendment 500
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Articles 4(2)(b), 20, 26, Chapters I and V of Annex I and point 4 of Annex II shall not apply to transport of animals for the purposes of an authorised project under Directive 2010/63/EU30 . | deleted |
| 30 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33–79. |
Or. en
Amendment 501
Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Articles 4(2)(b), 20, 26, Chapters I and V of Annex I and point 4 of Annex II shall not apply to transport of animals for the purposes of an authorised project under Directive 2010/63/EU30 . | deleted |
| 30 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33–79. |
Or. en
Amendment 502
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Articles 4(2)(b), 20, 26, Chapters I and V of Annex I and point 4 of Annex II shall not apply to transport of animals for the purposes of an authorised project under Directive 2010/63/EU30 . | 4. The transport of animals for the purposes of an authorised project under Directive 2010/63/EU30 shall only be carried out according to the animals' species-specific needs. |
| 30 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33–79. | 30 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33–79. |
Or. en
Amendment 503
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals, cephalopods and decapods; | 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals, including fish, where appropriate; |
Or. en
Amendment 504
Sander Smit, Jessika Van Leeuwen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals, cephalopods and decapods; | 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals |
Or. en
Amendment 505
Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals, cephalopods and decapods; | 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals; |
Or. en
Amendment 506
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals, cephalopods and decapods; | 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals, cephalopods and decapods excluding embryos such as fish roe; |
Or. en
Amendment 507
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals, cephalopods and decapods; | 1. ‘animals’ means live vertebrate animals, cephalopods and decapods, at all life stages; |
Or. en
Amendment 508
Dan-Ştefan Motreanu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. 'Economic activity' means the provision of live animal transport services, within an economic circuit, in exchange for remuneration or as an integral part of an economic activity. Such activity involves the movement of animals for trading, agricultural or commercial exploitation purposes or for related income-generating activities. |
Or. ro
Amendment 509
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. 'breeding animals' means animals which are transported for breeding purposes, including those specifically selected, kept or transported with the intention of contributing to breeding and/or conservation programmes; |
Or. es
Amendment 510
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. fr
Amendment 511
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point α
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. el
Amendment 512
Stefan Köhler, Jens Gieseke, Lena Düpont, Marion Walsmann, Christine Schneider, Norbert Lins, Alexandra Mehnert
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. de
Amendment 513
Marko Vešligaj
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where a terrestrial animal has been accommodated prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 514
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 515
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where a terrestrial animal has been accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 516
Carlo Fidanza, Sergio Berlato, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Ventola
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (Does not affect the English version.) |
Or. it
Amendment 517
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where a terrestrial animal has been accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 518
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least the four weeks prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 519
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 4 weeks prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 520
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 521
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 522
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Justification
The new proposal complicates multi-leg transport by requiring animals to stay at a location for at least a week. Maintaining the current 2 days rule is recommended.
Amendment 523
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. es
Justification
A seven-day waiting period at assembly centres or markets could make it difficult for those centres to survive. Assembly centres bring together a larger number of animals from smaller holdings, generating homogeneous lots and optimising logistics. Requiring farmers to collect livestock directly on the farm would not allow for the use of large, specialised vehicles owing to local conditions.
Amendment 524
Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella, Matteo Ricci
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for 48 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. it
Amendment 525
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 526
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 527
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 528
Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 529
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least a week prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or | (a) the place where an animal has been accommodated for at least 24h prior to departure and where it is first loaded onto a means of transport; or |
Or. en
Amendment 530
Philippe Olivier, Valérie Deloge, Julien Leonardelli, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) for equidae, this period is reduced to 24 hours; |
Or. fr
Amendment 531
Markus Ferber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an authorised assembly operation if the distance travelled between the first place of loading and the assembly operation is less than 100 km, or if the animals have been accommodated, untied, with sufficient bedding and fresh water for at least six hours prior to their departure from the assembly operation. This rule can only be applied once during the transport of an animal; |
Or. de
Amendment 532
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km and has been accommodated for at least 6 hours prior to departure. |
Or. en
Amendment 533
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 50 km and has been accomodated for at least 24 hours before departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 534
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point β
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. el
Amendment 535
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre |
Or. en
Amendment 536
Carlo Fidanza, Sergio Berlato, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Ventola
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. it
Amendment 537
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre. |
Or. en
Amendment 538
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre. |
Or. en
Amendment 539
Maria Walsh
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. en
Amendment 540
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Herbert Dorfmann, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. en
Amendment 541
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. en
Amendment 542
Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. en
Amendment 543
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Emmanouil Fragkos
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. en
Amendment 544
Stefan Köhler, Jens Gieseke, Lena Düpont, Marion Walsmann, Christine Schneider, Norbert Lins, Alexandra Mehnert
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. de
Amendment 545
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli, Mireia Borrás Pabón
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. fr
Amendment 546
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre; |
Or. es
Justification
Limiting to 100 km the distance between the place where an animal is collected and the assembly centre so that centres can be considered a 'place of departure' is not feasible, given the conditions in many Member States.
Amendment 547
Adrian-George Axinia, Aurelijus Veryga
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 200 km; |
Or. en
Amendment 548
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been transported within a distance of no more than 100 km; |
Or. en
Justification
The phrase "has been collected" is misleading, as it does not clearly indicate by whom or why it needs to be "collected"; it should therefore be replaced with "has been transported."
Amendment 549
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) an assembly centre if the animal has been collected within a distance of no more than 100 km; | (b) an assembly centre whenever these are required to carry animals to the place of destination; |
Or. en
Amendment 550
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) the animals have been accommodated with sufficient bedding, untied, if possible, and watered for at least six hours prior to the time of departure from the assembly centre; |
Or. en
Justification
It is important that the opportunity to collect animals from distances further than 100 km is still allowed as it is in the current legislation; otherwise, structurally weak regions will be significantly disadvantaged. Therefore this paragraph from the old animal transportation regulatin (EU-VP 1/2005) should be added.
Amendment 551
Bert-Jan Ruissen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) in derogation of point 2(a), provisions on prior accommodation do not apply to hatcheries. |
Or. en
Amendment 552
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) a livestock market |
Or. en
Amendment 553
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) a livestock market |
Or. en
Amendment 554
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle, Philippe Olivier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means the place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport; |
Or. fr
Justification
La définition des termes "lieu de destination", "lieu de départ" et "centre de rassemblement" à l'article 3 de laproposition, combinée au reste du texte, menace l'existence de marchés d'animaux vivants dans certains Étatsmembres. Il n'y a aucune raison d'organiser de tels marchés si le transporteur doit déjà savoir dans quelle fermel'animal aboutira, ce qui est impossible avant la vente effective sur le marché.En outre, l'imposition d'une période d'attente de sept jours dans les centres de rassemblement (s'ils doivent êtreconsidéré comme un "lieu de destination" selon la définition de la proposition) pourrait créer des difficultéspour la survie de ces centres. Les centres de rassemblement regroupent un grand nombre d'animaux provenantd'exploitations plus petites, ce qui permet de créer des lots homogènes et d'optimiser la logistique. Laconséquence de cette mesure serait que le bétail devrait être collecté directement à la ferme, ce qui est souventdifficile, car seuls de petits camions peuvent être utilisés. En effet, les conditions locales ne permettent pasl'approche de grands véhicules spécialisés. L'accès au marché pour les petites et moyennes exploitations setraduirait par des coûts de transport plus élevés.Nous suggérons de revenir à la définition fournie dans le règlement 1/2005. Amendement de repli avec les amendements 8 et 9.
Amendment 555
Bert-Jan Ruissen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure, or an assembly centre where animals are accommodated with sufficient bedding, untied where possible, and watered for at least six hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 556
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 4 weeks prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 557
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for the four weeks prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 558
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure, excluding transports that falls under Article 2, paragraph 2; |
Or. en
Amendment 559
Carlo Fidanza, Sergio Berlato, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Ventola
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 48 hours a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure and it is slaughtered; |
Or. it
Amendment 560
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. 'place of destination' means a slaughterhouse, assembly centre or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. es
Justification
The imposition of a seven-day waiting period at assembly centres (if they are considered a 'place of destination' as defined in the proposal) could create difficulties for the survival and running of those centres.
Amendment 561
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse, or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure, or an assembly centre; |
Or. en
Amendment 562
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 24h prior to the time of any subsequent departure or a concentration center. |
Or. en
Amendment 563
Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 564
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 565
Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 24 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 566
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 567
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. en
Justification
The new proposal severely restricts multi-leg transport by requiring a one-week stop for animals. Keeping the 2 days rule is recommended.
Amendment 568
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 569
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. en
Amendment 570
Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella, Matteo Ricci
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. it
Amendment 571
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least a week prior to the time of any subsequent departure; | 3. ‘place of destination’ means a slaughterhouse or any other place where an animal is unloaded from a means of transport and accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to the time of any subsequent departure; |
Or. fr
Amendment 572
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle, Philippe Olivier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point i (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) and accommodated for at least 48 hours prior to the time of departure; |
Or. fr
Justification
Fallback amendment.
Amendment 573
Julien Leonardelli, Valérie Deloge, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point ii (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ii) and slaughtered; |
Or. fr
Justification
Fallback amendment.
Amendment 574
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport excluding loading and unloading operations; |
Or. en
Amendment 575
Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. 'journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport excluding any loading and unloading operations; |
Or. en
Amendment 576
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. en
Amendment 577
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the entire transport operation from the place of departure to the place of destination, excluding loading and unloading operations |
Or. en
Amendment 578
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Emma Wiesner, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the entire transport operation from the place of departure to the place of destination excluding loading and unloading operations; |
Or. en
Amendment 579
Stefan Köhler, Jens Gieseke, Lena Düpont, Marion Walsmann, Christine Schneider, Norbert Lins, Alexandra Mehnert
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the entire transport operation from the place of departure to the place of destination, including any unloading, accommodation and loading occurring at intermediate points in the journey; |
Or. de
Amendment 580
Stanislav Stoyanov
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport and the related operations, excluding the loading and unloading operations. |
Or. en
Justification
excluding the loading/unloading from the overall transport journey would aim to avoid unnecessary further stress to the animals caused by eventual speed up of the process by the operators in order to fit in the planned journey time.
Amendment 581
Alexander Bernhuber
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the entire transport operation from the place of departure to the place of destination, including any unloading, accommodation and loading occurring at intermediate points in the journey; |
Or. en
Amendment 582
Carlo Fidanza, Sergio Berlato, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Ventola
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the entire transport operation from the place of departure to the place of destination, including the unloading, accommodation and loading operations occurring at the intermediate points of the journey; |
Or. it
Amendment 583
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Salvatore De Meo, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Maria Walsh, Flavio Tosi, Sophia Kircher, Herbert Dorfmann, Pekka Toveri, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport, excluding loading and unloading, and related operations; journey can include several transport legs carried out by the same or different means of transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 584
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport using one or more transport modes across multiple transport legs; it starts with the loading of last the animal onto the initial transport at the place of departure and ends with the unloading of the first animal at the place of destination; it includes all related operations, such as rest periods and transfers between transport modes; |
Or. en
Justification
The current definition of “journey” overlooks multi-leg transport, which is common in live animal transport. It should clarify that different legs may use various transport modes.
Amendment 585
Waldemar Buda, Anna Zalewska, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Szydło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with closure of the transport vehicle after the last animal has been loaded at the place of departure and ends with the opening of the vehicle in order to unload the first animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. en
Justification
Including the loading and unloading processes in the “journey” and “journey time” definitions puts undue pressure on animal handlers and transporters. Since loading and unloading are considered risky and stressful processes for both the animals and personnel, they should have no time constraints. In addition, Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 does not calculate loading and unloading times as driving time when optimising transports
Amendment 586
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. 'journey' means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the closing of the vehicle after the last animal has been loaded at the place of departure and ending with the opening of the vehicle for the unloading of the first animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. en
Amendment 587
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting vehicle leaving the first loading location e and ending arrival of the vehicle to the at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. en
Amendment 588
Merja Kyllönen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
2023/0448(COM)
Article 3 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the closing of vehicle after the last animal has been loaded at the place of departure and ending with the opening of the vehicle for unloading the first animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. en
Amendment 589
Bert-Jan Ruissen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with closing the vehicle after the loading of the last animal at the place of departure and ending with the opening of the vehicle for unloading of the first animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. en
Justification
In order to avoid stress, no time pressure should be put on the moment of loading and unloading.
Amendment 590
Cristina Maestre, Rosa Serrano Sierra, Elena Sancho Murillo, Alicia Homs Ginel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the departure of the vehicle from the first loading place and ending with the arrival of the vehicle at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. es
Justification
Given that loading and unloading are the most complex part of handling animals during transport, it does not seem prudent to use this article to increase the likelihood of those tasks being carried out in a hurry and in a stressed manner, a state which is detrimental to the farmer, the driver and the animals being transported. The current definition in Council Regulation (EU) 1/2005 has been kept.
Amendment 591
Emma Wiesner, Christine Singer
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting at the point when the first means of transport starts to move from the place of departure and ending with the arrival of the means of transport at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. en
Amendment 592
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte, Gilles Pennelle, Raffaele Stancanelli
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport, starting when the loaded vehicle leaves the place of departure and ending when it arrives at the place of destination; a ‘journey’ can involve several transport legs and one or more means of transport; |
Or. fr
Amendment 593
Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella, Matteo Ricci
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport from the place of departure to the place of destination, including the unloading and loading onto the means of transport occurring at the intermediate points of the journey, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. it
Amendment 594
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the total movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport during one or several transport legs starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the first place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the last place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; a journey can include several transport legs carried out by the same or different means of transport. |
Or. en
Amendment 595
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; | 4. ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting with the loading of the first animal onto the first means of transport at the place of departure and ending with the unloading of the last animal at the place of destination, whether inside or outside the Union, and the related operations including rest periods and transfer from one means of transport to another; |
Or. en
Amendment 596
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. When aquatic animals are towed in a cage or other type of holding unit, ‘journey’ means the movement of animals effected by one or more means of transport starting at the point when the means of transport that the holding unit is attached to starts to move from the place of departure, and ending with the arrival of the means of transport at the place of destination. |
Or. en
Amendment 597
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. “leg of a journey” means part of a journey in which a different means of transport is used from that used at the place of departure, such as when ro-ro vessels, vessels in general, or rail road are used to move lorries. |
Or. en
Amendment 598
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. ‘journey segment’ means a part of the journey in which no loading or unloading activities of animals take place; |
Or. en
Amendment 599
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5 a. ‘holding unit’ means a temporary accomodation for aquatic animals, such as a cage, box or tank; |
Or. en
Amendment 600
Sander Smit, Jessika Van Leeuwen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. ‘aquatic animals’ means fish, cephalopods and decapods; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 601
Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. ‘aquatic animals’ means fish, cephalopods and decapods; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 602
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. ‘aquatic animals’ means fish, cephalopods and decapods; | 6. ‘aquatic animals’ means live vertebrate fish, excluding aquatic animal embryos, larvae and eggs; |
Or. en
Amendment 603
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. ‘aquatic animals’ means fish, cephalopods and decapods; | 6. ‘aquatic animals’ means fish, cephalopods, decapods and mollucs, at all life stages; |
Or. en
Amendment 604
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6 a. ‘adult animal’ means an animal that has been fully weaned off milk; |
Or. en
Amendment 605
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) a transporter who transports or has subcontracted the transport of animals for the whole journey or a part of the journey to at least one other transporter; or | (a) a transporter who has subcontracted the transport of animals for the whole journey or a part of the journey to at least one other transporter; or |
Or. en
Amendment 606
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) a transporter who transports or has subcontracted the transport of animals for the whole journey or a part of the journey to at least one other transporter; or | (a) a transporter who has subcontracted the transport of animals for the whole journey or a part of the journey to at least one other transporter; or |
Or. en
Amendment 607
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) a natural or legal person who has contracted the transport of animals to a transporter; or | (b) a natural or legal person who has contracted one or more than one transporter for a journey; or |
Or. en
Amendment 608
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 4 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 609
Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 14 hours; |
Or. fr
Amendment 610
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey time that exceeds 12 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 611
Adrian-George Axinia, Aurelijus Veryga
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 12 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 612
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 12 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 613
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 12 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 614
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 8 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 615
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 8 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 616
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 8 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 617
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey that exceeds 9 hours; | 8. ‘long journey’ means a journey time that exceeds 9 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 618
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8 a. ‘transport for slaughter’ means transport with the intention of killing an animal either immediately upon arrival at the place of destination or within the next two months; |
Or. en
Amendment 619
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. ‘TRACES’ means the computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Articles 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; | 10. ‘TRACES’ means the EU computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Articles 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625, where third countries do not have access to TRACES, the third countries concerned, assisted by the Commission, shall ensure the interoperability of their respective computerized systems to facilitate the exchange of data; |
Or. en
Amendment 620
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind, Annalisa Corrado
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. ‘TRACES’ means the computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Articles 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; | 10. ‘TRACES’ means the EU computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Articles 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; where third countries might not be using TRACES, the European Commission and the third countries concerned shall ensure interoperability between their respective computerised systems to guarantee exchanges of data. |
Or. en
Amendment 621
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. ‘TRACES’ means the computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Articles 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; | 10. ‘TRACES’ means the Union computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Articles 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; where third countries do not use TRACES, the European Commission and the third countries concerned shall ensure interoperability between their respective computerised systems to guarantee exchanges of data. |
Or. en
Amendment 622
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. ‘TRACES’ means the computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Articles 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; | 10. ‘TRACES’ means the computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Articles 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; where third countries do not use TRACES, the European Commission and the third countries concerned shall ensure interoperability between their respective computer systems to guarantee data exchanges. |
Or. en
Amendment 623
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. ‘TRACES’ means the computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Articles 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; | 10. ‘TRACES’ means the Union's computerised system for the purposes of exchanging data, information and documents referred to in Article 133(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; if third countries do not use TRACES, the Commission and the relevant countries shall ensure that their systems are interoperable for seamless data exchange; |
Or. en
Justification
As third countries use different systems, interoperability is needed to prevent border delays from unverifiable transport data.
Amendment 624
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals on its own behalf, or on behalf of a third party; | 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals on its own behalf, or on behalf of a third party, holding an authorization issued by a competent authority as defined in Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625; |
Or. en
Amendment 625
Asger Christensen, Benoit Cassart, Valérie Devaux, Christine Singer, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals on its own behalf, or on behalf of a third party; | 11. ‘transporter’ means any natural or legal person transporting animals on its own account, or hire or reward |
Or. en
Amendment 626
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals on its own behalf, or on behalf of a third party; | 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals for own account, or hire and reward; |
Or. en
Amendment 627
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals on its own behalf, or on behalf of a third party; | 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals for own account, or hire and reward; |
Or. en
Amendment 628
Borja Giménez Larraz, Laurent Castillo, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals on its own behalf, or on behalf of a third party; | 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals for own account, or hire and reward; |
Or. en
Amendment 629
Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy , Tomáš Kubín, Julien Leonardelli, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals on its own behalf, or on behalf of a third party; | 11. ‘transporter’ means an operator whose economic activity consists of transporting animals on its own behalf, or for hire or reward; |
Or. fr
Amendment 630
Maria Noichl, Marianne Vind
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 8 hours, excluding loading and unloading; |
Or. en
Amendment 631
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 4 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 632
Veronika Vrecionová
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 14 hours; |
Or. en
Justification
A 9-hour time frame, including loading and unloading, may not be practical in many cases and could create pressure to accelerate the process, potentially affecting animal welfare. Considering the realities of transport logistics, including access to more remote areas, an extension to 14 hours appears to be a more balanced and workable approach.
Amendment 633
Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 14 hours; |
Or. fr
Amendment 634
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey time that does not exceed 12 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 635
Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 12 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 636
Adrian-George Axinia, Aurelijus Veryga
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 12 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 637
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Krzysztof Hetman, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 12 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 638
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 8 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 639
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 8 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 640
Emma Wiesner
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 8 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 641
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey that does not exceed 9 hours; | 12. ‘short journey’ means a journey time that does not exceed 9 hours; |
Or. en
Amendment 642
Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; | 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals, licensed as a veterinarian and independent from the transporter, who accompanies them during a transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 643
Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral, Alexander Bernhuber, Flavio Tosi, Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Borja Giménez Larraz, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; | 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; this person may be the driver; |
Or. en
Amendment 644
Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Valérie Devaux, Valérie Hayer, Hilde Vautmans, Urmas Paet, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Barry Cowen, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú, Elsi Katainen, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; | 13. ‘qualified animal technician’ means a trained person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; in the absence of a separate qualified animal technician, the driver is the qualified animal technician. |
Or. en
Amendment 645
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; | 13. ‘animal handler’ means a person directly responsible for the welfare of transported animals who accompanies them during a journey by road or rail in the absence of an independent animal handler, the driver is the animal handler. |
Or. en
Amendment 646
André Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; | 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport and who has received appropriate training and holds a certificate of competence; |
Or. en
Amendment 647
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; | 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; In the absence of a separate attendant, the driver is the attendant; |
Or. en
Amendment 648
Borja Giménez Larraz, Jens Gieseke, Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Sérgio Humberto, Flavio Tosi, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; | 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport. In the absence of a separate attendant, the driver is the attendant; |
Or. en
Amendment 649
Michal Wiezik
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; | 13. ‘attendant’ means a trained person who holds a certificate of competence and is directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; |
Or. en
Amendment 650
Tilly Metz, Thomas Waitz
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. ‘attendant’ means a person directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; | 13. ‘attendant’ means a person, other than the driver, directly in charge of the welfare of the transported animals who accompanies them during a journey on road or rail transport; |
Or. en