amendment list, 18 June 2026
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on clean corporate vehicles
Document CJ46-AM-789893 · (COM(2025)0994 – C100357/2025 – 2025/0421(COD))
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety Committee on Transport and Tourism
Full text
Jump to an amendment (23)
Text 152 paragraphs
Amendment 538
Jacek Ozdoba
on behalf of the ECR Group
Alexandr Vondra, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Anna Zalewska
Proposal for a regulation
Annex
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings | deleted |
| [...] | |
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | |
| [...] |
Or. en
Amendment 539
Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Dariusz Joński, Jens Gieseke, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Riho Terras, Magdalena Adamowicz, Andrea Wechsler, Miriam Lexmann, Andrey Novakov, Borja Giménez Larraz, Dolors Montserrat, Gheorghe Falcă, Massimiliano Salini, Letizia Moratti, Flavio Tosi
Proposal for a regulation
Annex
Read the rest (140 paragraphs)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings | deleted |
| [...] | |
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | |
| [...] |
Or. en
Amendment 540
Adrian-George Axinia
Proposal for a regulation
Annex
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings | deleted |
| [...] | |
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | |
| [...] |
Or. en
Amendment 541
Alexandr Vondra
on behalf of the ECR Group
Carlo Fidanza, Ondřej Krutílek
Proposal for a regulation
Annex
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings | deleted |
| [...] | |
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | |
| [...] |
Or. en
Amendment 542
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – paragraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall revise the differentiated national targets set out in Tables 1 and 2 of the Annex on the basis of a recalculated methodology reflecting a broader set of objective criteria. In recalculating the differentiated national targets, the Commission should take into account indicators better capturing domestic economic capacity, including, where appropriate, Gross National Income or purchasing power standards, and other indicators beyond economic capacity, such as: | |
| - grid capacity and energy system readiness; | |
| - current alternative infrastructure readiness, including availability of recharging and refuelling infrastructure; | |
| - financing conditions and effective business purchasing capacity; | |
| - operational and market conditions relevant to fleet deployment. | |
| The Commission should therefore review and, where necessary, recalculate the methodology underpinning the targets in the Annex accordingly. |
Or. en
Justification
Legislators are inviting the European Commission to review and recalculate the methodology underpinning the differentiated national targets, as reliance predominantly on GDP does not adequately reflect the effective investment capacity of undertakings and may lead to disproportionate target levels. In particular, GDP may overstate domestic purchasing power in Member States where a significant share of economic output accrues to foreign-owned capital and profits may be repatriated. In addition, a more proportionate differentiation of indicative national targets should reflect practical deployment conditions as well as effective investment capacity, rather than relying predominantly on macroeconomic output indicators alone.
Amendment 543
Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Dariusz Joński, Jens Gieseke, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Riho Terras, Magdalena Adamowicz, Andrea Wechsler, Miriam Lexmann, Andrey Novakov, Borja Giménez Larraz, Dolors Montserrat, Gheorghe Falcă, Massimiliano Salini, Letizia Moratti, Flavio Tosi
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings […] | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 544
Yvan Verougstraete
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 1 – Title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings | Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings |
Or. en
Amendment 545
Virginijus Sinkevičius, Kai Tegethoff
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 1 – Title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings | Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings |
Or. en
Amendment 546
Anne-Sophie Frigout, Mathilde Androuët, Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Valérie Deloge, Matthieu Valet, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Antonín Staněk, Philippe Olivier, Julien Leonardelli
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 1 – Title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 1: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings | Table 1: Minimum targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate cars by large undertakings |
Or. fr
Amendment 547
Anne-Sophie Frigout, Mathilde Androuët, Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Valérie Deloge, Matthieu Valet, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Antonín Staněk, Philippe Olivier, Julien Leonardelli
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2035 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 |
| Austria | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Belgium | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Bulgaria | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Croatia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Cyprus | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Czechia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Denmark | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Estonia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Finland | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| France | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Germany | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| Greece | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Hungary | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Ireland | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Italy | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Latvia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Lithuania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Luxembourg | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Malta | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Netherlands | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Poland | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Portugal | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Romania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovakia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovenia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Spain | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Sweden | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Amendment | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2035 | ||
| Austria | 90% | 95% | ||
| Belgium | 90% | 95% | ||
| Bulgaria | 48% | 67% | ||
| Croatia | 48% | 67% | ||
| Cyprus | 55% | 76% | ||
| Czechia | 55% | 76% | ||
| Denmark | 90% | 95% | ||
| Estonia | 55% | 76% | ||
| Finland | 83% | 95% | ||
| France | 69% | 95% | ||
| Germany | 83% | 95% | ||
| Greece | 48% | 67% | ||
| Hungary | 48% | 67% | ||
| Ireland | 90% | 95% | ||
| Italy | 69% | 95% | ||
| Latvia | 48% | 67% | ||
| Lithuania | 48% | 67% | ||
| Luxembourg | 90% | 95% | ||
| Malta | 69% | 95% | ||
| Netherlands | 90% | 95% | ||
| Poland | 48% | 67% | ||
| Portugal | 48% | 67% | ||
| Romania | 48% | 67% | ||
| Slovakia | 48% | 67% | ||
| Slovenia | 55% | 76% | ||
| Spain | 55% | 76% | ||
| Sweden | 90% | 95% |
Or. en
Amendment 548
Li Andersson
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2035 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 |
| Austria | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Belgium | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Bulgaria | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Croatia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Cyprus | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Czechia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Denmark | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Estonia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Finland | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| France | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Germany | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| Greece | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Hungary | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Ireland | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Italy | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Latvia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Lithuania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Luxembourg | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Malta | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Netherlands | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Poland | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Portugal | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Romania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovakia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovenia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Spain | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Sweden | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Amendment | ||||
| Member State | Target for the shares of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the shares of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 | ||
| Austria | 90% | 95% | ||
| Belgium | 90% | 95% | ||
| Bulgaria | 48% | 67% | ||
| Croatia | 48% | 67% | ||
| Cyprus | 55% | 76% | ||
| Czechia | 55% | 76% | ||
| Denmark | 90% | 95% | ||
| Estonia | 55% | 76% | ||
| Finland | 83% | 95% | ||
| France | 69% | 95% | ||
| Germany | 83% | 95% | ||
| Greece | 48% | 67% | ||
| Hungary | 48% | 67% | ||
| Ireland | 90% | 95% | ||
| Italy | 69% | 95% | ||
| Latvia | 48% | 67% | ||
| Lithuania | 48% | 67% | ||
| Luxembourg | 90% | 95% | ||
| Malta | 69% | 95% | ||
| Netherlands | 90% | 95% | ||
| Poland | 48% | 67% | ||
| Portugal | 48% | 67% | ||
| Romania | 48% | 67% | ||
| Slovakia | 48% | 67% | ||
| Slovenia | 55% | 76% | ||
| Spain | 55% | 76% | ||
| Sweden | 90% | 95% |
Or. en
Amendment 549
Virginijus Sinkevičius, Kai Tegethoff
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2035 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 |
| Austria | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Belgium | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Bulgaria | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Croatia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Cyprus | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Czechia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Denmark | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Estonia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Finland | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| France | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Germany | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| Greece | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Hungary | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Ireland | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Italy | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Latvia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Lithuania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Luxembourg | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Malta | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Netherlands | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Poland | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Portugal | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Romania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovakia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovenia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Spain | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Sweden | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Amendment | ||||
| Member State | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 | ||
| Austria | 90% | 100% | ||
| Belgium | 90% | 100% | ||
| Bulgaria | 48% | 100% | ||
| Croatia | 48% | 100% | ||
| Cyprus | 55% | 100% | ||
| Czechia | 55% | 100% | ||
| Denmark | 90% | 100% | ||
| Estonia | 55% | 100% | ||
| Finland | 83% | 100% | ||
| France | 69% | 100% | ||
| Germany | 83% | 100% | ||
| Greece | 48% | 100% | ||
| Hungary | 48% | 100% | ||
| Ireland | 90% | 100% | ||
| Italy | 69% | 100% | ||
| Latvia | 48% | 100% | ||
| Lithuania | 48% | 100% | ||
| Luxembourg | 90% | 100% | ||
| Malta | 69% | 100% | ||
| Netherlands | 90% | 100% | ||
| Poland | 48% | 100% | ||
| Portugal | 48% | 100% | ||
| Romania | 48% | 100% | ||
| Slovakia | 48% | 100% | ||
| Slovenia | 55% | 100% | ||
| Spain | 55% | 100% | ||
| Sweden | 90% | 100% |
Or. en
Amendment 550
Yvan Verougstraete
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2035 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 |
| Austria | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Belgium | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Bulgaria | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Croatia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Cyprus | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Czechia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Denmark | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Estonia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Finland | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| France | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Germany | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| Greece | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Hungary | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Ireland | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Italy | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Latvia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Lithuania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Luxembourg | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Malta | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Netherlands | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Poland | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Portugal | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Romania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovakia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovenia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Spain | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Sweden | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Amendment | ||||
| Member State | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 | ||
| Austria | 50% | 90% | ||
| Belgium | 65% | 95% | ||
| Bulgaria | 35% | 63% | ||
| Croatia | 35% | 63% | ||
| Cyprus | 40% | 72% | ||
| Czechia | 35% | 63% | ||
| Denmark | 65% | 95% | ||
| Estonia | 35% | 63% | ||
| Finland | 65% | 95% | ||
| France | 60% | 95% | ||
| Germany | 60% | 95% | ||
| Greece | 35% | 63% | ||
| Hungary | 35% | 63% | ||
| Ireland | 65% | 95% | ||
| Italy | 35% | 63% | ||
| Latvia | 35% | 63% | ||
| Lithuania | 35% | 63% | ||
| Luxembourg | 65% | 95% | ||
| Malta | 60% | 95% | ||
| Netherlands | 65% | 95% | ||
| Poland | 35% | 63% | ||
| Portugal | 50% | 90% | ||
| Romania | 35% | 63% | ||
| Slovakia | 35% | 63% | ||
| Slovenia | 35% | 63% | ||
| Spain | 35% | 63% | ||
| Sweden | 65% | 95% |
Or. en
Justification
We propose to delete the combined target for zero- and low-emission vehicles. Additionally, we adjust the target for zero-emission vehicles based on the following elements :
- The targets take into account both the GDP of each country (like in the Commission proposal) and the current level of adoption of electric vehicles.
- The level of adoption is based on the most recent available data (Q1 2026). The level of adoption is given twice the weight of importance compared to the GDP of each Member State.
- In order to compensate the lower overall level of ambition due to removal of the combined target, we raise the overall EU-level of ambition for zero-emission vehicles from 45% to 50%.
The overall EU ambition for zero-emission vehicles for 2035 is set to 90% in line with the Commission’s proposed objective on CO2 standards.
Amendment 551
Dario Tamburrano
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2035 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 |
| Austria | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Belgium | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Bulgaria | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Croatia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Cyprus | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Czechia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Denmark | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Estonia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Finland | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| France | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Germany | 83% | 54% | 95% | 95% |
| Greece | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Hungary | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Ireland | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Italy | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Latvia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Lithuania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Luxembourg | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Malta | 69% | 45% | 95% | 80% |
| Netherlands | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Poland | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Portugal | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Romania | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovakia | 48% | 31% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovenia | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Spain | 55% | 36% | 76% | 64% |
| Sweden | 90% | 58% | 95% | 95% |
| Amendment | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 | |
| Austria | 91% | 70% | 99% | |
| Belgium | 91% | 70% | 99% | |
| Bulgaria | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Croatia | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Cyprus | 56% | 43% | 67% | |
| Czechia | 56% | 43% | 67% | |
| Denmark | 91% | 70% | 99% | |
| Estonia | 56% | 43% | 67% | |
| Finland | 84% | 65% | 99% | |
| France | 70% | 54% | 84% | |
| Germany | 84% | 65% | 99% | |
| Greece | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Hungary | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Ireland | 91% | 70% | 99% | |
| Italy | 70% | 54% | 84% | |
| Latvia | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Lithuania | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Luxembourg | 91% | 70% | 99% | |
| Malta | 70% | 54% | 84% | |
| Netherlands | 91% | 70% | 99% | |
| Poland | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Portugal | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Romania | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Slovakia | 49% | 37% | 59% | |
| Slovenia | 56% | 43% | 67% | |
| Spain | 56% | 43% | 67% | |
| Sweden | 91% | 70% | 99% |
Or. en
Amendment 552
Anne-Sophie Frigout, Mathilde Androuët, Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Valérie Deloge, Matthieu Valet, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Antonín Staněk, Philippe Olivier, Julien Leonardelli
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | deleted |
| [...] |
Or. fr
Amendment 553
Anne-Sophie Frigout, Mathilde Androuët, Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Valérie Deloge, Matthieu Valet, Barbara Bonte, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Antonín Staněk, Viktória Ferenc, Philippe Olivier, Julien Leonardelli
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | deleted |
| [...] |
Or. fr
Amendment 554
Philippe Olivier, Julien Leonardelli
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | deleted |
| […] |
Or. fr
Amendment 555
Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Dariusz Joński, Jens Gieseke, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Riho Terras, Magdalena Adamowicz, Andrea Wechsler, Miriam Lexmann, Andrey Novakov, Borja Giménez Larraz, Dolors Montserrat, Gheorghe Falcă, Massimiliano Salini, Letizia Moratti, Flavio Tosi
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | deleted |
| […] |
Or. en
Amendment 556
Yvan Verougstraete
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 2– Title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings |
Or. en
Amendment 557
Virginijus Sinkevičius, Kai Tegethoff
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 2– Title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles and targets for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings | Table 2: Minimum targets for the share of zero emission vehicles in yearly new registrations of corporate vans by large undertakings |
Or. en
Amendment 558
Li Andersson
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2035 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 |
| Austria | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Belgium | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Bulgaria | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Croatia | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Cyprus | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Czechia | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Denmark | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Estonia | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Finland | 48% | 43% | 95% | 95% |
| France | 40% | 36% | 95% | 80% |
| Germany | 48% | 43% | 95% | 95% |
| Greece | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Hungary | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Ireland | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Italy | 40% | 36% | 95% | 80% |
| Latvia | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Lithuania | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Luxembourg | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Malta | 40% | 36% | 95% | 80% |
| Netherlands | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Poland | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Portugal | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Romania | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovakia | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovenia | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Spain | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Sweden | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Amendment | ||||
| Member State | Target for the shares of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 | ||
| Austria | 52% | 95% | ||
| Belgium | 52% | 95% | ||
| Bulgaria | 28% | 67% | ||
| Croatia | 28% | 67% | ||
| Cyprus | 32% | 76% | ||
| Czechia | 32% | 76% | ||
| Denmark | 52% | 95% | ||
| Estonia | 32% | 76% | ||
| Finland | 48% | 95% | ||
| France | 40% | 95% | ||
| Germany | 48% | 95% | ||
| Greece | 28% | 67% | ||
| Hungary | 28% | 67% | ||
| Ireland | 52% | 95% | ||
| Italy | 40% | 95% | ||
| Latvia | 28% | 67% | ||
| Lithuania | 28% | 67% | ||
| Luxembourg | 52% | 95% | ||
| Malta | 40% | 95% | ||
| Netherlands | 52% | 95% | ||
| Poland | 28% | 67% | ||
| Portugal | 28% | 67% | ||
| Romania | 28% | 67% | ||
| Slovakia | 28% | 67% | ||
| Slovenia | 32% | 76% | ||
| Spain | 32% | 76% | ||
| Sweden | 52% | 95% |
Or. en
Amendment 559
Virginijus Sinkevičius, Kai Tegethoff
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2035 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 |
| Austria | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Belgium | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Bulgaria | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Croatia | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Cyprus | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Czechia | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Denmark | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Estonia | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Finland | 48% | 43% | 95% | 95% |
| France | 40% | 36% | 95% | 80% |
| Germany | 48% | 43% | 95% | 95% |
| Greece | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Hungary | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Ireland | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Italy | 40% | 36% | 95% | 80% |
| Latvia | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Lithuania | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Luxembourg | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Malta | 40% | 36% | 95% | 80% |
| Netherlands | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Poland | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Portugal | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Romania | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovakia | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovenia | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Spain | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Sweden | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Amendment | ||||
| Member State | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 | ||
| Austria | 52% | 100% | ||
| Belgium | 52% | 100% | ||
| Bulgaria | 28% | 100% | ||
| Croatia | 28% | 100% | ||
| Cyprus | 32% | 100% | ||
| Czechia | 32% | 100% | ||
| Denmark | 52% | 100% | ||
| Estonia | 32% | 100% | ||
| Finland | 48% | 100% | ||
| France | 40% | 100% | ||
| Germany | 48% | 100% | ||
| Greece | 28% | 100% | ||
| Hungary | 28% | 100% | ||
| Ireland | 52% | 100% | ||
| Italy | 40% | 100% | ||
| Latvia | 28% | 100% | ||
| Lithuania | 28% | 100% | ||
| Luxembourg | 52% | 100% | ||
| Malta | 40% | 100% | ||
| Netherlands | 52% | 100% | ||
| Poland | 28% | 100% | ||
| Portugal | 28% | 100% | ||
| Romania | 28% | 100% | ||
| Slovakia | 28% | 100% | ||
| Slovenia | 32% | 100% | ||
| Spain | 32% | 100% | ||
| Sweden | 52% | 100% |
Or. en
Amendment 560
Yvan Verougstraete
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Table 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | ||||
| Member State | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Target for the combined shares of zero- and low-emission vehicles, from 2035 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 |
| Austria | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Belgium | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Bulgaria | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Croatia | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Cyprus | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Czechia | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Denmark | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Estonia | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Finland | 48% | 43% | 95% | 95% |
| France | 40% | 36% | 95% | 80% |
| Germany | 48% | 43% | 95% | 95% |
| Greece | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Hungary | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Ireland | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Italy | 40% | 36% | 95% | 80% |
| Latvia | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Lithuania | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Luxembourg | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Malta | 40% | 36% | 95% | 80% |
| Netherlands | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Poland | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Portugal | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Romania | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovakia | 28% | 25% | 67% | 56% |
| Slovenia | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Spain | 32% | 29% | 76% | 64% |
| Sweden | 52% | 47% | 95% | 95% |
| Amendment | ||||
| Member State | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2030 | Minimum target for the share of zero-emission vehicles, from 2035 | ||
| Austria | 47% | 95% | ||
| Belgium | 47% | 95% | ||
| Bulgaria | 25% | 56% | ||
| Croatia | 25% | 56% | ||
| Cyprus | 29% | 64% | ||
| Czechia | 29% | 64% | ||
| Denmark | 47% | 95% | ||
| Estonia | 29% | 64% | ||
| Finland | 43% | 95% | ||
| France | 36% | 80% | ||
| Germany | 43% | 95% | ||
| Greece | 25% | 56% | ||
| Hungary | 25% | 56% | ||
| Ireland | 47% | 95% | ||
| Italy | 36% | 80% | ||
| Latvia | 25% | 56% | ||
| Lithuania | 25% | 56% | ||
| Luxembourg | 47% | 95% | ||
| Malta | 36% | 80% | ||
| Netherlands | 47% | 95% | ||
| Poland | 25% | 56% | ||
| Portugal | 25% | 56% | ||
| Romania | 25% | 56% | ||
| Slovakia | 25% | 56% | ||
| Slovenia | 29% | 64% | ||
| Spain | 29% | 64% | ||
| Sweden | 47% | 95% |
Or. en
Justification
We propose the deletion of the combined zero- and low-emission vehicles target to not incentivise the uptake of hybrid vehicles.