On the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part

(COM(2025)0810 – C100128/2026 – 2025/0810(NLE))

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

–having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2025)0810),

–having regard to the draft Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part (12461/2025),

–having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 91, Article 100(2), Article 207(4), first subparagraph, Article 209(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C10-0128/2026),

–having regard to its non-legislative resolution of [date] on the proposal for a decision,

–having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4), and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

–having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on International Trade (A10-0181/2026),

1.Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;

2.Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United Mexican States.

DECLARATION OF INPUT FROM JAVI LÓPEZ

Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he included in his report input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the report, prior to the adoption thereof in committee, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:

The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.

Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.

DECLARATION OF INPUT FROM BORJA GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ

Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he included in his report input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the report, prior to the adoption thereof in committee, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:

The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.

Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.

pursuant to Rule 56(4) of the Rules of Procedure

Lynn Boylan, Marina Mesure, Danilo Della Valle

The Commission argues that this trade agreement will help Europe address geopolitical instability and economic uncertainty. But this deal will not deliver the benefits claimed.

It gives corporations the right to sue States before international tribunals for millions of euros when governments regulate in the public interest, while granting no equivalent rights to workers, communities or the environment. This exposes a contradiction with Europe’s exit from the Energy Charter Treaty to protect itself from such lawsuits.

The agreement also runs counter to efforts to re-industrialise Europe. It facilitates the relocation of industries, particularly automotive production, to Mexico, and puts workers in Europe and Mexico into competition instead of supporting decent jobs, deepening a race to the bottom.

It restricts governments’ policy space while promoting a harmful extractivist model. It also incentivises agri-food exports instead of supporting agricultural sovereignty in Mexico and Europe.

The Commission’s own evaluation of the existing agreement with Mexico found that, after nearly twenty years, its impact was marginal for both parties even by the narrow measure of GDP. There is little basis to expect this revised deal to deliver the promised economic benefits.

We support a stronger EU-Mexico relationship and closer cooperation, but on different terms.