Plenary report, 4 February 2026
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union designs (codification)
Report A-10-2026-0013 · (COM(2025)0353 – C100140/2025 – 2025/0190(COD))
Committee on Legal Affairs · Rapporteur: Magdalena Adamowicz
- Voted on Tuesday, 10 February 2026 · Passed 613 for, 5 against, 29 abstained · See the decision →
- Where the law stands · dossier 2025/0190 →
AI:In short
Parliament adopts its first-reading position on the codified regulation on European Union designs, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the legal services.
Position. The Committee on Legal Affairs proposes that Parliament adopt its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the legal services.
Key points
- The proposal is a straightforward codification of existing texts without any change in their substance.
- Parliament adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party.
Legal basis. Article 294(2) and Article 118, first paragraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Full text
Draft european parliament legislative resolution 12 paragraphs
(COM(2025)0353 – C100140/2025 – 2025/0190(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure – codification)
The European Parliament,
–having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2025)0353),
–having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 118, first paragraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C100140/2025),
–having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
–having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 - Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts,
–having regard to Rules 112 and 60 of its Rules of Procedure,
–having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A10-0013/2026),
A.whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance;
1.Adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
2.Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Annex: opinion of the consultative working party of the legal services of the european parliament, the council and the commission 13 paragraphs
| CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES |
Brussels, 4 September 2025
OPINION
FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
THE COUNCIL
THE COMMISSION
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union designs (codification)
COM(2025)353 final of 3.7.2025 – 2025/0190(COD)
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to point 4 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 11 July 2025 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
At that meeting, an examination of the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council codifying Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on European Union designs resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, that in recitals 38 and 39 of the draft codified text the word ‘would’, contained in recitals 27 and 28 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, should be reinstated in the place of the word ‘should’.
In addition, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal is a straightforward codification of existing texts, without any change in their substance.
F. DREXLER E. FINNEGAN D. CALLEJA CRESPO
Jurisconsult Jurisconsult Director-General
Annex: declaration of input 1 paragraph
The rapporteur declares under her exclusive responsibility that she did not include in her report input from interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies, to be listed in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.
Procedure pages
How the committees handled the text, and how their members voted on it.
Procedure – committee responsible 1 paragraph
| Title | European Union designs (codification) | |
| References | COM(2025)0353 – C10-0140/2025 – 2025/0190(COD) | |
| Date submitted to Parliament | 3.7.2025 | |
| Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenary | JURI 8.9.2025 | |
| Rapporteurs Date appointed | Magdalena Adamowicz 4.7.2025 | |
| Date adopted | 28.1.2026 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 19 1 0 |
| Date tabled | 4.2.2026 |
Final vote by roll call by the committee responsible 3 paragraphs
19 · For
- ECR
- Mario Mantovani
- EPP
- Maravillas Abadía Jover, Alexander Bernhuber, Henrik Dahl, Axel Voss, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Marion Walsmann, Michał Wawrykiewicz
- Patriots
- Ton Diepeveen, Pascale Piera
- Renew
- Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Dainius Žalimas
- S&D
- Victor Negrescu, René Repasi, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Tiemo Wölken, Lara Wolters
- The Left
- Mario Furore
- Greens
- Tineke Strik
1 · Against
- ESN
- Mary Khan
0 · Abstained