Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

12 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 parts of the text voted on separately (8 lapsed).

· 1

  1. Vote 1:Proposal to reject the text

    A10-0158/2025 – Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas – Proposal for rejection – Am 422

    Rejected 108 for, 436 against, 24 abstained

    13:15

· 3

  1. Vote 2:Final vote on the provisional agreement · the decisive vote

    A10-0158/2025 – Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas – Provisional agreement – Am 428

    Passed 437 for, 112 against, 20 abstained

    13:15
  2. Vote 3:Final vote

    Text as a whole

    Lapsed show of hands

  3. Vote 12:Final vote

    Commission proposal

    Lapsed no count

· 8

  1. Vote 4:Separate vote on Article 2

    Article 2 – after paragraph 1

    Lapsed no count

  2. Vote 5:Separate vote on Article 6

    Article 6 – paragraph 1 – § 1

    Lapsed no count

  3. Vote 6:Separate vote on Article 6

    Article 6 – paragraph 3 – § 1 (corresponds to Article 6, paragraph 7, § 2 in Amendment 428)

    Lapsed no count

  4. Vote 7:Separate vote on Article 6

    Article 6 – paragraph 3 – § 1 (corresponds to Article 6, paragraph 7, § 2 in Amendment 428)

    Lapsed show of hands

  5. Vote 8:Separate vote on Article 9

    Article 9 – paragraph 1

    Lapsed no count

  6. Vote 9:Separate vote on Article 9

    Article 9 – paragraph 1

    Lapsed show of hands

  7. Vote 10:Separate vote on recital 6

    Lapsed no count

  8. Vote 11:Separate vote on recital 6

    Lapsed show of hands

← Back to the decision