Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final., Economy & single market
Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles
Passed by a large majority
Parliament adopted its position on the law.
- For
- 437
- Against
- 112
- Abstained
- 20
roll-call vote at 13:15 · 77% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas · Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council. · Report A-10-2025-0158
AI:What this decision does
The European Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU law setting circularity requirements for vehicle design and managing end-of-life vehicles.§1: source passage in the text The law aims to support the automotive sector's shift to a circular economy by promoting recycled materials and improving how vehicles are scrapped.§2: source passage in the text Parliament's position includes amendments to clarify rules, cut red tape, and align with other EU laws, while keeping targets realistic for industry.§2: source passage in the text The position now goes to the Council for negotiation before the law can be finalized.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP; Against: Patriots, ESN; Divided: ECR
- The Left For 38 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 45
- Greens For 42 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 107 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 135
- Renew For 62 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 78
- EPP For 140 for, 1 against, 1 abstainedof 185
- ECR Divided 37 for, 13 against, 14 abstainedof 82
- Patriots Against 4 for, 61 against, 0 abstainedof 86
- ESN Against 0 for, 24 against, 0 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 7 for, 13 against, 5 abstainedof 29
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
6 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
EPP voted for (140 of 142). Against: 1, Abstained: 1
Céline Imart (France, abstained), Sunčana Glavak (Croatia, against)
Patriots voted against (61 of 65). For: 4
Jaroslav Knot (Czechia), Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová (Czechia), Ondřej Knotek (Czechia), Tomáš Kubín (Czechia)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 parts of the text voted on separately (8 lapsed).