Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Changes between two versions

What changed between the resolution motion joint and the adopted text

From · resolution motion joint· 12 Jun 2026

RC-10-2026-0238

on the implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines

To · adopted text· 18 Jun 2026

TA-10-2026-0228

Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines

AI:What changed, in short

Adds calls for a temporary suspension of EPR and quaternary treatment obligations pending an impact assessment and a Commission communication by July 2026.57 Adds recitals questioning cost estimates and the attribution of micropollutants to pharmaceuticals, and a call for progress on implementing acts.126 Removes a paragraph supporting the gradual implementation timeline and EPR as the preferred financing model.79 The other changes are formal or wording: updated recital letters, decimal separators, and renumbering.3489

5 changes of substance · 2 formal · 2 of wording only

Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.

Changes of substance · 5

Change 1 Substance

AI summary:Adds two recitals stating that quaternary treatment is the costliest feature and that Member States' cost estimates exceed the Commission's impact assessment, citing Germany and Spain.

Show the text change (2 lines)

Added:N. whereas the introduction of quaternary treatment is the costliest feature of the Directive;

Added:O. whereas Member States’ cost estimates significantly exceed those provided in the Commission’s impact assessment (e.g. Germany and Spain have reported costs several times higher);

Change 2 Substance

AI summary:Adds a recital questioning the Commission's attribution of about 92% of micropollutant load to pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, citing lack of analysis of consequences for patient access and healthcare budgets.

Show the text change (1 line)

Added:T. whereas the Commission’s attribution of approximately 92 % of the micropollutant load to pharmaceuticals and cosmetics has been questioned on methodological and scientific grounds, in particular given the lack of a thorough analysis of the consequences for patient access and national healthcare budgets; whereas this omission is especially critical for the entire pharmaceutical ecosystem, encompassing innovative, generic and off-patent medicines, which collectively underpins patient access, security of supply and the long-term sustainability of European healthcare systems, while sustaining the investment in research and development and the manufacturing footprint on which Europe’s strategic autonomy in health depends;

Change 5 Substance

AI summary:Replaces 'independent study' with 'impact assessment', adds a call for a Commission communication by end of July 2026, and adds a temporary suspension of EPR obligations as a safeguard.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:6. Calls on the Commission to produce a new independentimpact studyassessment by the end of 2026 identifying the list of substances present in urban wastewater, verifying the costs of quaternary treatment and the attribution of responsibility to the relevant sectors under the polluter pays principle, and identifying the potential impact on the availability, affordability and accessibility of medicines, in particular generic and critical medicines and their active substances; considers that the Member States, through the Human Pharmaceutical Committee, and the European Environment Agency and the European Medicines Agency should be appropriately involved in the study, within their areas of competence; calls on the Commission to accelerate, if necessary on the basis of the studyimpact assessment results, the evaluation of the allocation of substances, and also, if necessary, to immediately reattribute EPR obligations to the sectors identified as responsible; calls on the Commission to issue a communication by the end of July 2026 informing Member States about the independent study and the flexibilities under the directive to ensure the accessibility, availability and affordability of medicines, and to take the necessary measures to monitor the security of supply of medicines and crisis preparedness and avoid unintended consequences for the supply of medicines, including consequences arising from the EPR provisions; considers that, if the results of the studyimpact assessment demonstrate significant risk to the affordability, availability and accessibility of medicines, in particular critical and generic medicines, the Commission should swiftly adopt safeguards to guarantee the security of supply of these medicines;medicines, including a temporary suspension of EPR obligations;

Change 6 Substance

AI summary:Adds a new paragraph calling on the Commission to progress on implementing acts for quaternary treatment obligations to provide clarity on costs.

Show the text change (1 line)

Added:7. Calls on the Commission to make progress on the adoption of implementing acts on the scope of obligations relating to quaternary treatment, to give clarity to the Member States, wastewater operators and relevant stakeholders with regard to the associated costs;

1 more change of substance

Change 7 Substance

AI summary:Removes a paragraph recalling the gradual implementation timeline and adds a new paragraph calling for a temporary suspension ('stop the clock') of EPR and quaternary treatment obligations until study completion.

Show the text change (2 lines)

Removed:8. Recalls the gradual implementation timeline for the EPR and quaternary treatment obligations, with certain provisions not fully applying until 2045, which provides sufficient time for the gradual and balanced implementation of the directive and the quaternary treatment obligations, namely 20 % coverage by 2033, 60 % by 2039 and full coverage by 2045; recalls that the technical aspects of the EPR provisions and national EPR organisations can be adjusted at both EU and national level to ensure fairness and effectiveness; calls for both the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the directive’s existing provisions to ensure that evidence and appropriate and reliable data are fully taken into consideration in the implementation of the directive;

Added:9. Calls for a temporary suspension (‘stop the clock’) of the EPR provisions and of the quaternary treatment obligations and related financial obligations until the completion of the study and the assessment of its findings by the Commission;

2 formal changes: legal basis, citations, references, corrections

Change 3 Formal

AI summary:Updates the recital letter from Y to AB and changes decimal separators in the cost estimates from 2.64 to 2,64 and 3.20 to 3,20.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:Y.AB. whereas the Commission estimates that, even in a scenario of full cost pass-through, the impact on medicine prices would amount to EUR 2.642,64 to EUR 3.203,20 per person per year by 2045; an estimate that was reconfirmed in December 2025 by the JRC, which took into account the final text adopted by the co-legislators;

Change 4 Formal

AI summary:Updates the recital letter from AC to AF and changes the decimal separator in the cost figure from 1.186 to 1,186.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:AC.AF. whereas the Commission’s impact assessment shows that, in the absence of EPR, the estimated annual costs of quaternary treatment of approximately EUR 1.1861,186 billion per year by 2040 would otherwise have to be covered primarily through higher water tariffs and from public budgets, thereby shifting pollution costs from industry to citizens and taxpayers, and placing an unfair burden on households, including the most vulnerable ones;

2 changes of wording only

Change 8 Wording

AI summary:Renumbers paragraph 10 to 11 and adds 'research, development and' before 'manufacturing capacity'.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:10.11. Stresses that medicine shortages are already a major and growing challenge in the EU; highlights the need to safeguard EU pharmaceutical research, development and manufacturing capacity and supply chain resilience;

Change 9 Wording

AI summary:Renumbers paragraph 13 to 14 and rephrases the text to remove the statement that EPR is the most effective and fair financing model, now simply noting the challenges.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:13. Recalls that EPR represents the most effective and fair financing model for quaternary treatment, ensuring stable investment, while avoiding additional pressure on public budgets and water tariffs, and providing an incentive for the development of products that biodegrade rapidly or that do not generate micropollutants in wastewater at the end of their life cycle; notes,14. however,Notes the challenges of availing of the incentive, owing to the complexities of modifications to medicinal formulations, which may require extensive research or new marketing authorisations, in particular for generic medicines;