Changes between two versions
What changed between the draft committee report and the plenary report
From · draft committee report· 13 Jun 2023
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 648/2012, (EU) No 575/2013 and (EU) 2017/1131 as regards measures to mitigate excessive exposures to third-country central counterparties and improve the efficiency of Union clearing markets
To · plenary report· 5 Dec 2023
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 648/2012, (EU) No 575/2013 and (EU) 2017/1131 as regards measures to mitigate excessive exposures to third-country central counterparties and improve the efficiency of Union clearing markets
These two texts have too little in common to compare paragraph by paragraph: they are different documents rather than versions of one (for example one group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted).
+1,076 added · −527 removed · 5 changed paragraphs, packaging included.
Part 25 of 28: Paragraphs 1439–1498
Added:1.5.4. Compatibility with the Multiannual Financial Framework and possible synergies with other appropriate instruments
Added:1.5.5. Assessment of the different available financing options, including scope for redeployment
Added:1.6. Duration and financial impact of the proposal/initiative
Added:1.7. Management mode(s) planned
Added:2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES
Added:2.1. Monitoring and reporting rules
Added:2.2. Management and control system(s)
Added:2.2.1. Justification of the management mode(s), the funding implementation mechanism(s), the payment modalities and the control strategy proposed
Added:2.2.2. Information concerning the risks identified and the internal control system(s) set up to mitigate them
Added:2.2.3. Estimation and justification of the cost-effectiveness of the controls (ratio of "control costs ÷ value of the related funds managed"), and assessment of the expected levels of risk of error (at payment & at closure)
Added:2.3. Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities
Added:3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
Added:3.1. Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected
Added:3.2. Estimated financial impact of the proposal on appropriations
Added:3.2.1. Summary of estimated impact on operational appropriations
Added:3.2.2. Estimated output funded with operational appropriations
Added:3.2.3. Summary of estimated impact on administrative appropriations
Added:3.2.4. Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework
Added:3.2.5. Third-party contributions
Added:3.3. Estimated impact on revenue
Added:LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Added:FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
Added:1.1. Title of the proposal/initiative
Added:Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories amending Regulations (EU) No 648/2012, (EU) No 575/2013 and (EU) 2017/1131 Text with EEA relevance.
Added:1.2. Policy area(s) concerned
Added:Internal Market – Financial Services.
Added:1.3. The proposal/initiative relates to:
Added:a new action
Added:a new action following a pilot project/preparatory action
Added:the extension of an existing action
Added:a merger or redirection of one or more actions towards another/a new action
Added:1.4. Objective(s)
Added:1.4.1. General objective(s)
Added:Promote financial stability and strengthen the Capital Markets Union (CMU).
Added:1.4.2. Specific objective(s)
Added:This proposal has the following specific objectives to achieve the general objectives for the EU internal market for central clearing services:
Added:- Encourage clearing at EU CCPs and reduce excessive reliance on systemic non-EU CCP by building a more attractive and robust EU clearing market.
Added:- Ensure that the supervisory framework for EU CCPs is sufficient to manage the risks associated with the interconnectedness of the EU financial system and increasing clearing volumes, in particular in respect to cross-border risks, as these risks could be further amplified as EU clearing markets grow.
Added:Expected result(s) and impact
Added:Specify the effects which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted.
Added:The proposal aims to strengthen the EU clearing market by improving the attractiveness of EU CCPs, encouraging clearing in EU CCPs and enhancing the assessment and management of cross-border risks.
Added:1.4.3. Indicators of performance
Added:Specify the indicators for monitoring progress and achievements.
Added:For each specific objective the following performance indicators have been set.
Added:Improve the attractiveness of EU CCPs:
Added:– Measured by % of contracts cleared by EU clearing participants in EU and third-country CCPs.
Added:– Number of new EU CCP products approved.
Added:– Time taken on average (number of days) to approve new CCP products and validate model changes.
Added:– Number of non-objection procedures completed.
Added:Encourage clearing in EU CCPs:
Added:– Average amounts on active accounts at EU CCPs.
Added:– Transactions cleared in EU CCPs in different currencies (absolute value and compared to global markets).
Added:– Number of clearing members and clients in EU CCPs.
Added:– Volume of contracts cleared outside EU CCPs by EU actors or for EU-currency denominated contracts.
Added:Enhancing the assessment of cross-border risks:
Added:– Number of opinions issued by ESMA per year.
Added:– Number of cases where NCAs deviate from ESMA opinions.
Added:– Number of joint supervisory teams established and tasks performed.
Added:– Number of times ESMA coordinated information requests or asked.
Added:1.5. Grounds for the proposal/initiative