Changes between two versions
What changed between the draft committee report and the plenary report
From · draft committee report· 5 Nov 2025
on the nomination of Daniel Caspary as a Member of the Court of Auditors
To · plenary report· 21 Nov 2025
on the nomination of Daniel Caspary as a Member of the Court of Auditors
AI:What changed, in short
The committee now delivers a favourable opinion, removing the possibility of an unfavourable one.2 The other change is formal: capitalization of 'committee'.1
1 change of substance · 1 formal · 0 of wording only
Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
+0 added · −0 removed · 4 changed paragraphs, packaging included.
Part 1 of 3: PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
on the nomination of Daniel Caspary as a Member of the Court of Auditors
Changed:(C100269(C100269/2025 – 2025/0809(NLE))
4 unchanged paragraphs
(Consultation)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C100269/2025),
– having regard to Rule 133 of its Rules of Procedure,
Changed:– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A100000/2025),(A10-0238/2025),
A. whereas, by letter of 24 October 2025, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Daniel Caspary as a Member of the Court of Auditors;
B. whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate Daniel Caspary’s credentials, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; whereas in carrying out that evaluation, the Committee received a curriculum vitae from Daniel Caspary, as well as the replies to the written questionnaire that he had been sent;
Change 1
Changed:C. whereas the Committeecommittee subsequently held a hearing with Daniel Caspary on 20 November 2025, at which he made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee;
Change 2
Changed:1. Delivers a favourable/an unfavourablefavourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Daniel Caspary as a Member of the Court of Auditors;
2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.