Changes between two versions
What changed between the draft committee report and the plenary report
From · draft committee report· 9 Jan 2024
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union for the financial year 2022
To · plenary report· 8 Mar 2024
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union for the financial year 2022
Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.
The changes · 15
Change 1
Changed:1. Grants the Director of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre’s budget for the financial year 2022 / Postpones its decision on granting the Director of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre’s budget for the financial year 2022;
Change 2 under “2. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION”
Changed:1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union for the financial year 2022 / Postpones the closure of the accounts of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union for the financial year 2022;
Change 3 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:B. whereas the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’), in its report on the annual accounts of the Centre for the financial year 2022 (the ‘Court’s report’), states that it has obtained reasonable assurance that the Centre’s annual accounts are reliable, and that the underlying transactions as regards revenue are legal and regular in all material aspects; whereas the Court identified irregular payments of, in total,totalling EUR 1,3 millionmillion, of which EUR 0,6 million are concernedpertained byto the Court’s viewdetermination that the Centre’s justifications for the choice ofselecting certain procurement procedures without prior notification were insufficientinsufficient, and EUR 0,7 million are in connectionrelated withto a failure by the Centre to monitor the consumption of financial ceilings at the level of individual procedures and framework contracts for translations, representingcumulatively inaccounting totalfor 2,4 % of the payment appropriations available in 2022, thereby exceeding the materiality threshold set for the audit and, consequently, resulting in a qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of payments underlying the Centre’s accounts; whereas, except for those irregular payments, the Court concluded that the underlying transactions as regards payments for the year ended 31 December 2022 are legal and regular in all material respects;
Change 4 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:2. Notes that the Centre’s initial budget for 2022 (EUR 49,0 million) was subject to one amending budget adopted by the Centre’s management board (MB) in September 2022 and aimed to include the updated forecasts received from clients and the result of the review by the Centre of all expenditure items; notes further that the final 2022 budget outturn includes the result of the actual calculation of the 2022 budget outturn (minus EUR 0,05 million) plus the 2021 budget outturn of EUR 1,1 millionmillion, minusfrom which EUR 2,3 million was transferred to the ‘Reserve for pricing stability’ for securing the budget stability of the Centre in the future, resulting in a budget outturn carried forward in 2023 of minusa deficit of EUR 1,2 million;
11 more changes
Change 5 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:3. Notes that the overall implementation rate of the Centre’s work programme for 2022 was 89,6 % based onaccording theto amending budget 1/2022; regrets that that rate is lower than in 2021 (93,4 %), therefore ending a positive trend of year-on-year improvements since 2018 when the implementation rate was 82,4 %;
Change 6 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:9. ObservesNotes that the Centre for takingtook a significant step towards sustainability and environmental protection by signing a new lease contract and reducing its office space by 33 %, while establishing new working spaces, including a cafeteria;
Change 7 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Added:11. Welcomes that the Administration Department of the Centre has improved its performance by reviewing and revising working methods, while introducing new technology to streamline its operations, which has resulted in increased productivity, reduced costs, and overall improvement of the quality of the work;
Change 8 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:12.13. Notes with appreciation from the Court’s report that the Centre is among thethose agencies that have corporate plans to improve the energy efficiency and climate neutrality of their operations; regrets that the Centre is not yet in possession of an Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) certificate, but welcomes that it is actively studying the possibility of starting the EMAS registration procedure in the near future; notes that the Centre is committed to continuously improving its environmental performance and relies on the general principles of EMAS and the ISO 14001 in its daily practices; welcomes the Centre’s measures to reduce gas and electricity consumption at the Centre’s premises for the period 1 November 2022 to 31 March 2023;
Change 9 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:13.14. Notes that, on 31 December 2022, the establishment plan was 93,78 % implemented, with 46 officials and 135 temporary agents appointed out of 51 officials and 142 temporary agents authorised under the Union budget (193 authorised posts, same as in 2021); notes that, in addition, 20 contract agents worked for the Centre in 2022;
Change 10 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:14.15. Notes the Centre’s gender breakdown reported for 2022, with 8 women (42 %) and 11 men (58 %) in senior and middle management positions, with 38 men (59 %) and 26 women (41 %) at MBmanagement board level and overall staff with 76 men (38 %) and 125 women (62 %); observes that there is an underrepresentation of men in the Centre’s overall staff; recalls the importance to ensure gender balance and asks the Centre to work towards gender balance at the staffstaff, senior and middle management level and at MBmanagement board level; asks the Commission and the Member States to take into account the importance of ensuring gender balance when nominating their members to the Centre’s management board; notes the high number of MBmanagement board members, which does not facilitate decision-making and simplified management;
Change 11 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:18.19. Notes with concern the Court’s qualified opinion according to which payments amounting to EUR 0,1 million were irregular asalong werewith the two contracts of EUR 110 000 and EUR 52 000, towith which those payments were associated and which the Centre chose to negotiate with a single provider without the prior publication of a contract notice,notice; notes that despite the Centre having justified its choice of procedure byon the grounds of extreme urgency, whereas the Centre’s justification has been found insufficient by the Court; further notes furthermore the Centre’s reply that the Centreit chose to procure an extension of the service through a negotiated procedure because no solution to bridgetransition betweenfrom the old andto the new framework contract (FWC) was found;
Change 12 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:19.20. Highlights furtherfurthermore the Court’s qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of payments made in 2022 in connection with 117 separate FWCframework contracts stemming from a single procedure relating to the translation of texts; notes from the Court’s report that the global ceiling for that procedure, which was EUR 1 million, was not stipulated in the associated FWC;framework contracts; regrets that this finding was in breach of Article 2(31) of the Financial Regulation; notes moreover that the Centre did not monitor the consumption of that global ceiling either at the level of the individual FWCframework contract or for the whole procedure, but only followed the related spending at the level of the budget line concerned; regrets that this led to an amount of EUR 0,5 million being irregularly paid in excess of that ceiling; notes from the Centre’s reply the actions taken by the Centre to improve the Centre’s controls systems in this area, namely the development of a BusinessObjectsBusiness Objects report which lists all framework contracts in force and includes all the necessary details to follow the consumption of the ceiling of each one of those contracts; welcomes in this context the development of technical features that automatically detect, highlight and/or send warning emails when various budget consumption rates are reached (75 % and 90 %);
Change 13 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:20.21. ObservesNotes that the CVs of the MBmanagement board members are not published on the Centre’s website, while the declarations of interests of a majority of those members are uploaded thereon; notes that the Director’s declaration of interests and CV are published on the Centre’s website; notes from the Centre's report on the measures taken by the Centre in light of the discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Centre for the financial year 2021, that the Centre is still working on the solution that will allow the MB’smanagement board’s members to upload and maintain the declaration of interests and CVs by themselves; urges the Centre to finalise this technical step and calls on the Centre to report to the discharge authority on the progress made in this matter until all documents of all board members are published;
Change 14 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:21.22. Welcomes that declarations of interests are signed by the candidates and staff before being recruited, during employment and before returning from leave on personal grounds/unpaidgrounds or unpaid leave; welcomes further that the staff involved in selection committees for the recruitment of personnel or in evaluation committees for calls for tenders must fill in a declaration of confidentiality and absence of conflicts of interest; notes from the Centre’s reply that there were no cases of conflicts of interest or whistleblowing were in 2022;
Change 15 under “3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION”
Changed:24.25. Notes that at the beginning of 2022, the Centre had 5five open audit recommendations stemming from two Internal Audit Services (IAS) audits; acknowledges in this context that by the end of 2022, the two recommendations relating to the 2019 IAS audit on the Centre’s system for the management of the translation workflow and one of the three recommendations from the 2021 IAS audit on planning and budgeting were closed; notes further that for the two remaining recommendations, none of which marked as ‘very important’ or ‘critical’, actions have been addressed and the residual risk for these is minimal;