Changes between two versions
What changed between the resolution motion and the adopted text
From · resolution motion· 1 Jul 2026
on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87705 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
AI:What changed, in short
The only substantive change is that Parliament now calls on the Commission to repeal the adopted decision rather than withdraw the draft.5 The other changes are formal: references to the draft are updated to the adopted Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/1419.1234
1 change of substance · 4 formal · 0 of wording only
Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.
Changes of substance · 1
Change 5 Substance
AI summary:Changes the call on the Commission from withdrawing its draft decision to repealing the adopted decision.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:3. Calls on the Commission to withdrawrepeal itsCommission draftImplementing implementingDecision decision;(EU) 2026/1419;
4 formal changes: legal basis, citations, references, corrections
Change 1 Formal
AI summary:Updates the reference to the Commission act by adding its full title and publication date.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:– having regard the draft Commission implementingImplementing decisionDecision (EU) 2026/1419 of 29 June 2026 renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87705 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (D114998/04),Council,
Change 2 Formal
AI summary:Replaces references to the draft decision with the adopted Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/1419.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:R. whereas theCommission draftImplementing CommissionDecision implementing(EU) decision2026/1419 would allow imports into the Union that do not comply with the standards observed by Union farmers, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage;
Change 3 Formal
AI summary:Replaces references to the draft decision with the adopted Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/1419.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:1. Considers that theCommission draftImplementing CommissionDecision implementing(EU) decision2026/1419 exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003;
Change 4 Formal
AI summary:Replaces references to the draft decision with the adopted Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/1419.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:2. Considers that theCommission draftImplementing CommissionDecision implementing(EU) decision2026/1419 is not consistent with Union law, in that it is not compatible with the aim of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, which is, in accordance with the general principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council, to provide the basis for ensuring a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests, in relation to GM food and feed, while ensuring the effective functioning of the internal market;