What changed between the resolution motion and the adopted text

Removed:B100563/2025

Added:P10_TA(2025)0338

Changed:European Parliament resolution on the European citizens’ initiativeCitizens’ entitledInitiative ‘My Voice,voice, Mymy Choice:choice: Forfor Safesafe and Accessibleaccessible Abortion’abortion’

Removed:(2025/3007(RSP))

Added:PE781.257

Added:European Parliament resolution of 17 December 2025 on the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘My Voice, My Choice: For Safe and Accessible Abortion’ (2025/3007(RSP))

The European Parliament,

Changed:– having regard to the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘My Voice,Voice My Choice: For Safe and Accessible Abortion’ (ECI(2024)000004),

Removed:– having regard to Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and paragraph 1 thereof on the principle of subsidiarity,

Added:– having regard to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/1158 of 10 April 2024 on the request for registration, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of the European citizens’ initiative entitled My Voice, My Choice: For Safe and Accessible Abortion,

Removed:– having regard to Article 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) concerning public health and in particular paragraph 7 thereof, which states that ‘Union action shall respect the responsibilities of the Member States for the definition of their health policy and for the organisation and delivery of health services and medical care’,

Added:– having regard to Article 9, Article 19, Article 24, first paragraph, and Article 168(5) and(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Changed:– having regard to theArticles Programme2, of3 Actionand adopted11(4) atof the 1994 Cairo International ConferenceTreaty on Population andEuropean Development,Union,

Changed:– having regard to theArticles judgment1, of3, the4 Courtand 21 of Justicethe Charter of 4Fundamental OctoberRights 1991of inthe caseEuropean C-159/90,Union,

Added:– having regard to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 1979,

Added:– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948,

Added:– having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950,

Added:– having regard to Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action of 1995,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 26 November 2020 on the de facto ban on the right to abortion in Poland,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 24 June 2021 on the situation of sexual and reproductive health and rights in the EU, in the frame of women’s health,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 11 November 2021 on the first anniversary of the de facto abortion ban in Poland,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 5 May 2022 on the impact of the war against Ukraine on women,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 9 June 2022 on global threats to abortion rights: the possible overturning of abortion rights in the US by the Supreme Court,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 7 July 2022 on the US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights in the United States and the need to safeguard abortion rights and women’s health in the EU,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 22 November 2023 on proposals of the European Parliament for the amendment of the Treaties,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 28 February 2024 entitled ‘Report on the Commission’s 2023 Rule of Law report’,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 11 April 2024 on including the right to abortion in the EU Fundamental Rights Charter,

Added:– having regard to the 2015 WHO guidelines entitled ‘Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems’,

Added:– having regard to the WHO 2017-2021 strategy on women’s health and well-being in the WHO European region and the associated report entitled ‘Women’s health and well-being in Europe: beyond the mortality advantage’, both published on 30 September 2016,

Added:– having regard to the WHO action plan entitled ‘Action plan for sexual and reproductive health: towards achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in Europe – leaving no one behind’, published on 12 September 2016,

Added:– having regard to the WHO abortion care guideline, published on 8 March 2022, and to the second edition thereof, published on 24 August 2025,

Added:– having regard to the Commission communication of 5 March 2020 entitled ‘A Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025’ (COM(2020)0152),

Added:– having regard to the Commission communication of 12 November 2020 entitled ‘Union of Equality: LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025’ (COM(2020)0698),

Added:– having regard to the Commission communication of 8 October 2025 entitled ‘Union of Equality: LGBTIQ+ Equality Strategy 2026-2030’ (COM(2025)0725),

Added:– having regard to the 2025 EU Roadmap for Women’s Rights (COM(2025)0097) and the annex thereto,

Added:– having regard to Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare,

Added:– having regard to the relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights concerning access to reproductive healthcare services, including its judgment of 16 December 2010 in A, B and C v Ireland (Application No 25579/05), its judgment of 30 October 2012 in P. and S. v Poland (Application No 57375/08) and its judgment of 25 July 2017 in Carvalho Pinto de Sousa Morais v Portugal (Application No 17484/15),

Added:– having regard to the Center for Reproductive Rights’ report of 23 September 2025 entitled ‘Europe abortion laws 2025 – policies, progress and challenges’,

Added:– having regard to the European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights document entitled ‘Contraception Policy Atlas Europe 2025’, published on 14 February 2025,

– having regard to Rule 228(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

Change 1

Removed:A. whereas Article 5 TEU reaffirms the principle of subsidiarity as a fundamental safeguard of national sovereignty;

Added:– having regard to the motion for a resolution of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality,

Removed:B. whereas, in accordance with Article 168(7) TFEU, the competence to regulate abortion policies falls exclusively within the prerogative of the Member States, forming part of their sovereign right to define and organise their own health systems;

Added:A. whereas the European citizens’ initiative (ECI) is a tool for EU citizens to call on the Commission to propose new legislation; whereas when an ECI gathers at least one million signatures, the Commission must, within six months of the ECI’s validation, spell out what actions it intends to take in response;

Removed:C. whereas, from its inception, the EU has been founded on respect for the diversity of the legal, social and cultural traditions of the Member States, and the coexistence of distinct national laws represents a historical reality predating European integration;

Added:B. whereas ‘My Voice My Choice’ is a citizens’ movement bringing together more than 300 organisations across Europe; whereas the movement calls on the EU to ensure safe and accessible abortion for all and demands that the EU pass legislation that would create a financial mechanism to help Member States that voluntarily join the mechanism to provide safe abortion care for all those who do not have access to it;

Removed:D. whereas the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘My Voice, My Choice’ singles out certain Member States for their national public-health-related legislation and indirectly encourages actions that would contravene their domestic laws;

Added:C. whereas, in Decision (EU) 2024/1158 on the registration of the ECI, the Commission stated that ‘there seems to be no straightforward targeted interference with the competences of Member States to define their own health policy and the organisation of their health services by the simple fact of providing financial support to provide this type of health services’;

Removed:1. Notes that the ‘My Voice, My Choice’ initiative seeks to establish a European funding mechanism for abortion, which would amount to indirect harmonisation and constitute an unacceptable attempt to bypass the Treaties – including the principle of subsidiarity – and to undermine the sovereign authority of the Member States;

Added:D. whereas access to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), including safe, universally accessible and legal abortion care, is a fundamental right; whereas banning access to reproductive care does not reduce the need for abortion care, but rather increases recourse to unsafe abortion, which has a negative impact on many areas of women’s and girls’ lives, including their fertility and mortality, or forces patients to travel abroad to obtain legal abortion care;

Removed:2. Reaffirms that the EU has no legal competence to legislate, promote or finance initiatives in the field of abortion policy; recalls that any decisions in this area remain exclusively within the remit of the Member States;

Added:E. whereas individuals’ ability to exercise their reproductive autonomy, including their right to decide freely and responsibly whether, when and how to have children, must be guaranteed in order to achieve gender equality and the full enjoyment of human rights for everyone in Europe; whereas the right to bodily integrity and autonomy must be fully respected and guaranteed;

Removed:3. Calls on the Commission to reject the ‘My Voice, My Choice’ initiative as incompatible with the limits of EU competences, the fundamental principles of subsidiarity and national sovereignty enshrined in the Treaties, and respect for the national legal frameworks of the Member States;

Added:F. whereas according to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, women’s right to health includes their sexual and reproductive rights, and, in its General Recommendation No 35, the Committee states that ‘violations of women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights, such as forced sterilization, forced abortion, forced pregnancy, criminalization of abortion, denial or delay of safe abortion or post-abortion care, forced continuation of pregnancy, and abuse and mistreatment of women and girls seeking sexual and reproductive health information, goods and services, are forms of gender-based violence that, depending on the circumstances, may amount to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment’; whereas the Committee urges states to repeal laws criminalising abortion; whereas the WHO and international human rights bodies call on countries to legalise abortion on request and eliminate unnecessary and harmful barriers that delay or prevent timely access to abortion care;

Added:G. whereas SRHR are included in the targets of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, specifically Target 3.7 on ensuring universal access to sexual and reproductive healthcare services, and Target 5.6 on ensuring universal access to SRHR;

Added:H. whereas the fulfilment of SRHR is essential in upholding human dignity and is intrinsically linked to combating sexual and gender-based violence, achieving gender equality, and upholding other human rights, such as the rights to life, health, privacy, security of the person, non-discrimination, equality before the law, and freedom from torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;

Added:I. whereas the inability to access universally accessible, safe and legal abortion directly restricts women’s rights, including their rights to self-determination, physical and mental integrity, health, education and work; whereas the restriction of such rights reduces women to their procreative role and thus creates discrimination on the basis of sex;

Added:J. whereas many EU Member States have taken meaningful legislative steps to advance access to abortion by removing harmful procedural and regulatory barriers and abolishing criminal penalties; whereas, however, two Member States still do not allow abortion on request, eight Member States maintain a mandatory waiting period and several Member States either do not reimburse or subsidise abortion care or only offer limited coverage; whereas 11 countries in Europe do not provide medication abortion (i.e. non-surgical abortion) and only five allow abortion care via telemedicine; whereas the time limits for abortion on request vary significantly within Europe, ranging from 10 weeks to 24 weeks;

Added:K. whereas some Member States still maintain regressive barriers to abortion access, including mandatory counselling, an option for medical professionals to refuse to provide abortion care, mandatory ultrasounds, a lack of financial coverage, mandatory third-party authorisations, restrictions on reasons for abortion care and restrictions on abortion methods; whereas some Member States have even introduced such barriers recently;

Added:L. whereas data show that most abortions occur in the first trimester and that the majority of women who have abortions already have children, are married or are in long-term relationships, or were using contraception at the time;