Changes between two versions
What changed between the resolution motion and the adopted text
From · resolution motion· 20 Nov 2025
on the draft Commission implementing decision on the financing of the annual action plan in favour of the United Republic of Tanzania for 2025
AI:What changed, in short
The versions differ only in formal points and wording: updated dates, regulation references, and terminology.1234
0 changes of substance · 5 formal · 2 of wording only
Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.
Changes of substance · 0
None: the changes are formal or of wording only.
5 formal changes: legal basis, citations, references, corrections
Change 1 Formal
AI summary:Updates the date format and replaces 'AAP' with 'draft Commission implementing decision'.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:A. whereas on 22 October,October 2025, the AAPdraft Commission implementing decision was presented to the NDICI Committee;
Change 3 Formal
AI summary:Changes '98%' to '98 %' for spacing.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:C. whereas the African Union’s election observation mission has strongly criticised the conduct of the Tanzanian presidential election, which saw the incumbent President elected with an apparent 98%98 % of the vote; whereas the Tanzanian government, contrary to elections in 2015, did not invite a European Election Observation Mission;
Change 4 Formal
AI summary:Updates the date format by adding '2025' after 'May'.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:F. whereas the Tanzanian government has not fulfilled any of the demands that the European Parliament put forward in its resolution of 8 May,May 2025, including among others the call for immediately and unconditionally releasing Mr. Lissu, for implementing a judicial reform, for improving the human rights situation and for putting forward an electoral reform;
Change 5 Formal
AI summary:Removes the document reference '(D110180/02)' and changes 'Regulation (EC) No' to 'Regulation (EU)'.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:1. Considers that the draft Commission implementing decision (D110180/02) exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No(EU) 2021/947;
Change 6 Formal
AI summary:Removes the document reference '(D110180/02)', changes 'not compatible' to 'incompatible', and updates the regulation reference.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:2. Considers that the draft Commission implementing decision (D110180/02) is not consistent with Union law, in that it is not compatibleincompatible with the aim of Regulation (EC) No(EU) 2021/947;
2 changes of wording only
Change 2 Wording
AI summary:Replaces 'AAP' with 'draft Commission implementing decision'.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:B. whereas the AAPdraft Commission implementing decision demonstrates a misguided approach by the Commission, which does not fully reflect the democratic and human rights deficiencies in Tanzania over the past years, particularly since the fraudulent elections in October 2025, in the aftermath of which the government crushed demonstrations leading to the death of well over 400 people, and hundreds of people have been charged with treason;
Change 7 Wording
AI summary:Removes the document reference '(D110180/02)', replaces 'proposal' with 'draft', and adds 'to the committee'.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:4. Calls on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision (D110180/02) and to submit a new proposaldraft to the committee that respects the concerns raised, while ensuring that any new changes do not adversely affect funding directed to support NGOs and civil society;