Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Changes between two versions

What changed between the plenary report and the adopted text

From · plenary report· 9 Sept 2026

A-10-2026-0227

on the request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun

To · adopted text· 15 Sept 2026

TA-10-2026-0274

Request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun

AI:What changed, in short

The versions differ only in wording: the request's origin, the alleged statements, the election and membership dates, and the immunity and constitutional provisions are rephrased without changing what the text does.1234

0 changes of substance · 0 formal · 6 of wording only

Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 18 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.

Changes of substance · 0

None: the changes are formal or of wording only.

6 changes of wording only

Change 1 Wording

AI summary:Replaces wording on the origin of the immunity waiver request, adding the Republic of Poland and the Kraków Branch of the Institute of National Remembrance and rephrasing who made the request.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:A. whereas, by letter of 25 February 2026, the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Poland transmitted a request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun, a Member of the European Parliament elected in Poland, made byfrom the Prosecutor at the Kraków Branch Office of the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation (Instytut(Oddział Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej w Krakowie – Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu), in connection with alleged offences that took place in 2025;

Change 2 Wording

AI summary:Rephrases the description of the alleged statements, adding allegedly and in public and removing it is alleged that, without changing the alleged offence.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:B. whereas, according to the request, on 27 September 2025, during a public debate in Warsaw that was broadcast live and streamed on the internet, it is alleged that Grzegorz Braun publicly,allegedly, in public and contrary to the facts, denied the crimes of genocide committed between 1941 and 1944 by officials of the Third Reich at the Nazi-German KL AuschwitzBirkenau concentration and extermination camp; whereas, according to the request, a viewing of the recording of the debate revealed that the statements allegedly made by Grzegorz Braun concerning the extermination of Jewish prisoners in the gas chambers are manifestly at odds with the historical truth; whereas the alleged act constitutes an offence under Article 55 of the Act of 18 December 1998 on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation;

Change 3 Wording

AI summary:Reorders the wording on Grzegorz Braun's election to the European Parliament in June 2024 and his membership at the time of the alleged offence.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:E. whereas Grzegorz Braun was elected to the European Parliament in the European electionsJune in2024 JuneEuropean 2024,elections and whereas hetherefore was therefore a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence;

Change 4 Wording

AI summary:Replaces their parliament with the parliament of their Member State in the citation of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:H. whereas Article 9, first paragraph, point (a), of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union provides that, during the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members are to enjoy, in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of the parliament of their parliament;Member State;

Change 5 Wording

AI summary:Rephrases the citation of Article 105(2) and (5) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland on criminal accountability, detention and arrest of deputies.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:I. whereas, pursuant to Article 105(2) and (5) of the PolishConstitution Constitution,of the Republic of Poland, from the day theof electionannouncement of the results areof announcedthe elections until the day theirof mandatethe expires,expiry deputiesof cannotthe mandate, a deputy is not to be subjected to criminal accountability without the consent of the Sejm, and cana deputy is to be neither detained nor arrested without the consent of the Sejm, except infor cases wherewhen theythe havedeputy has been apprehended in the commission of an offence and in which theirthe detention is necessary tofor securesecuring the proper course of proceedings;

Change 6 Wording

AI summary:Rephrases the statement that Parliament cannot assume the role of a court and that a Member cannot be regarded as a defendant in a waiver of immunity procedure.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:K. whereas Parliament cannot assume the role of a court, andcourt whereas,and, in a waiver of immunity procedure, a Member cannot be regarded as a defendant;