Changes between two versions
What changed between the plenary report and the adopted text
From · plenary report· 23 Apr 2026
on the request for the waiver of the immunity of Alvise Pérez
To · adopted text· 28 Apr 2026
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Alvise Pérez
AI:What changed, in short
The two versions differ only in wording and formal points: no substantive changes are made to the waiver request.1234
0 changes of substance · 2 formal · 7 of wording only
Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.
Changes of substance · 0
None: the changes are formal or of wording only.
2 formal changes: legal basis, citations, references, corrections
Change 1 Formal
AI summary:Updates the date format by adding a comma after the year.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:– having heard Alvise Pérez on 24 March 20262026, in accordance with Rule 9(6) of its Rules of Procedure,
Change 5 Formal
AI summary:Adds the word 'Member' before 'State' in the reference to the territory of the Member State.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:E. whereas Article 9, first paragraph, point (a), of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union provides that, during the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members are to enjoy, in the territory of their own Member State, the immunities accorded to members of the parliament of their Member State;
7 changes of wording only
Change 2 Wording
AI summary:Removes the auxiliary verb 'has' from the phrase 'has requested'.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:A. whereas, by letter dated 7 October 2025, the President of the Supreme Court of Spain has requested the waiver of the immunity of Alvise Pérez, Member of the European Parliament elected in Spain, in connection with alleged offences that occurred in 2024;
Change 3 Wording
AI summary:Replaces 'may constitute' with 'might constitute' in the description of alleged offences.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:B. whereas the request indicates that in January and in February 2024 the administrator of a Telegram channel called ‘Alvise Pérez Chat’ allegedly published statements indicating the names of ‘those responsible for the ideological persecution known as hate crimes’, referring in particular to the delegated public prosecutor for hate crimes in Valencia; whereas the statements published on that channel generated an immediate reaction from numerous followers of the channel, who sent more than 1 500 comments to that delegated public prosecutor, mostly of an insulting nature; whereas the alleged conduct maymight constitute the offences of harassment or stalking, incitement to commit assault against an authority or a public official, coercion and/or spreading hate via social media, pursuant to Article 172-ter and to Article 18(1) of the Spanish Criminal Code in connection with Article 553 of the Spanish Criminal Code;
Change 4 Wording
AI summary:Rephrases the sentence about the timing of election and alleged offences, changing word order and punctuation.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:C. whereas Alvise Pérez was elected to the European Parliament in the European elections of June 2024,2024 and thereforewas, wastherefore, not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offences;
Change 6 Wording
AI summary:Rewords the quotation from the Spanish Constitution, changing 'Members of Congress and Senators' to 'Deputies and senators' and rephrasing the privilege description.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:‘(1). Members of CongressDeputies and Senatorssenators shall enjoy freedomabsolute ofprivilege speechin forrespect of opinions expressed in the exerciseperformance of their functions’.duties.
Change 7 Wording
AI summary:Rewords the quotation about immunity, changing terminology and sentence structure while preserving the meaning.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:(2). During their term of office, Members of Congressdeputies and Senatorssenators shall likewise enjoy freedomalso fromhave arrestimmunity and may only be arrested only if they are found in the eventact of flagrantecommitting delicto.an offence. They maycannot be neither indictedcharged noror triedprosecuted without the prior authorization of theirthe respectiverelevant House’;legislative chamber’;
Change 8 Wording
AI summary:Rephrases the statement about parliamentary immunity, moving 'Member's' before 'personal privilege'.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:H. whereas, in accordance with Rule 5(2) of its Rules of Procedure, parliamentary immunity is not a Member’s personal privilege of the Member but a guarantee of the independence of Parliament as a whole and of its Members;
Change 9 Wording
AI summary:Rephrases the conclusion about fumus persecutionis, changing 'factual elements indicating' to 'it does not appear' and 'undermine' to 'damage', and adds a clause about Parliament's independence.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:I. whereas, in this case, Parliament has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, that is to say factualit elementsdoes indicatingnot appear that the intention underlying the legal proceedings in question is to underminedamage Alvise Pérez’s political activity as a Member of the European Parliament;Parliament and thus Parliament’s independence;