Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Changes between two versions

What changed between the plenary report and the adopted text

From · plenary report· 25 Feb 2026

A-10-2026-0019

on copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges

To · adopted text· 10 Mar 2026

TA-10-2026-0066

Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges

AI:What changed, in short

The versions differ only in formal points: decimal separator and punctuation are updated.12

0 changes of substance · 2 formal · 0 of wording only

Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.

Changes of substance · 0

None: the changes are formal or of wording only.

2 formal changes: legal basis, citations, references, corrections

Change 1 Formal

AI summary:Replaces the decimal separator in the percentage from a period to a comma, aligning with European formatting conventions.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:C. whereas the creative and cultural sector plays a key role in safeguarding European values and cultural diversity, representing approximately 4 % of EU value added and 6.96,9 % of the EU’s gross domestic product; whereas the sector employs around 8 million people, underpinning Europe’s cultural diversity, social cohesion, values and democratic dialogue;

Change 2 Formal

AI summary:Changes the punctuation at the end of the paragraph from a period to a semicolon, likely to connect with the following text.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:18. Notes the use of GenAI systems that rely massively on protected content, reproducing it without authorisation from, or compensation for, the rights holders affected by such use, particularly when integrated into search engines or other digital services that enable the generation, often in real time and at marginal cost, of content that infringes upon original works and other protected subject matter on which the models were trained, or that was scraped, including in real time, by such models; is alarmed that these practices may result in the provision of products and services that directly and unfairly compete with those of the rights holders, including through illegal self-preferencing of gatekeepers.gatekeepers;