Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Changes between two versions

What changed between the plenary report and the adopted text

From · plenary report· 12 Dec 2025

A-10-2025-0265

on the implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025

To · adopted text· 21 Jan 2026

TA-10-2026-0013

Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025

AI:What changed, in short

Adds strong criticism of US policy under Trump, including on Greenland, Venezuela, and the National Security Strategy, and calls for European strategic autonomy.1111516 Updates positions on Ukraine, adding welcomes for EU financial aid, asset immobilisation, and the reassurance force, and regrets on energy imports and Nord Stream.4567 Revises Middle East and neighbourhood sections, adding details on Gaza ceasefire, Lebanon, and Southern Mediterranean cooperation, and removes old paragraphs.910 Adds new paragraphs on Finland, China's Taiwan exercise, and Greenland satellite coverage, and updates China and Russia-China cooperation paragraphs.31213 Other changes are formal or wording: renumbering, decimal separators, and a typo fix.21820

17 changes of substance · 3 formal · 0 of wording only

Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

+20 added · −14 removed · 20 changed paragraphs, packaging included.

Part 1 of 4: MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

Removed:MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

Added:P10_TA(2026)0013

Changed:on the implementationImplementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025

Removed:(2025/2165(INI))

Added:Committee on Security and Defence

Added:PE776.984

Added:European Parliament resolution of 21 January 2026 on the implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025 (2025/2165(INI))

5 unchanged paragraphs

The European Parliament,

– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Title V of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), in particular the provisions on the common security and defence policy (CSDP),

– having regard to the Versailles Declaration adopted at the informal meeting of Heads of State or Government on 11 March 2022,

– having regard to the Strategic Compass for Security and Defence – For a European Union that protects its citizens, values and interests and contributes to international peace and security, which was approved by the Council on 21 March 2022 and endorsed by the European Council on 25 March 2022,

– having regard to the Civilian CSDP Compact – Towards more effective civilian missions, approved by the Council on 22 May 2023,

Changed:– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 of 11 December 2017 establishing permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) and determining the list of participating Member States1,States,

Changed:– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/890 of 18 March 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2021/509 establishing a European Peace Facility2,Facility,

Changed:– having regard to Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/10923,2018/1092,

19 unchanged paragraphs

– having regard to the Commission proposal of 19 March 2025 for a Council regulation establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) through the reinforcement of the European defence industry Instrument (COM(2025)0122),

– having regard to the Commission proposal of 22 April 2025 for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/695, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/1153, (EU) 2023/1525 and 2024/795, as regards incentivising defence-related investments in the EU budget to implement the ReArm Europe Plan (COM(2025)0188),

– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council, particularly those of 26 June 2025, 20 March 2025 and 6 March 2025,

– having regard to the informal meeting of Heads of State or Government held in Copenhagen on 1 October 2025,

– having regard to the Council conclusions on Arms Export Control, adopted on 14 April 2025,

– having regard to the joint communication from the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 5 March 2024 entitled ‘A new European Defence Industrial Strategy: Achieving EU readiness through a responsive and resilient European Defence Industry’ (JOIN(2024)0010),

– having regard to the political guidelines for the next European Commission 2024-2029, entitled ‘Europe’s choice’, presented on 18 July 2024 by the candidate for the European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen,

– having regard to the report by Mario Draghi of 9 September 2024 entitled ‘The future of European competitiveness’ and, in particular, Chapter 4 thereof on increasing security and reducing dependencies,

– having regard to the report by Sauli Niinistö of 30 October 2024 entitled ‘Safer Together – Strengthening Europe’s Civilian and Military Preparedness and Readiness’,

– having regard to the joint white paper from the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 19 March 2025 entitled ‘Joint white paper for European Defence Readiness 2030’ (JOIN(2025)0120),

– having regard to the security and defence partnerships signed by the EU and Canada on 23 June 2025 and by the EU and the United Kingdom on 19 May 2025,

– having regard to the North Atlantic Treaty, which came into force in 1949,

– having regard to the The Hague Summit Declaration issued by the Heads of State and Government of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in The Hague on 25 June 2025,

– having regard to the 10th progress report of 10 June 2025 on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by the EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017,

– having regard to the three joint declarations on EU-NATO cooperation signed by the Presidents of the European Council and the Commission and the NATO Secretary General on 10 January 2023, 10 July 2018 and 8 July 2016 respectively,

– having regard to its resolution of 9 October 2025 on a united response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure,

– having regard to its resolution of 2 April 2025 on the implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024,

– having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2025 on the white paper on the future of European defence,

– having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2025 on continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression,

Changed:– having regard to its resolution of 24 October 2024 on the misinterpretation of UN resolution 2758 by the People’s Republic of China and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan, and to China’s military exercises, including ‘Justice Mission 2025’,

Added:– having regard to its resolution of 23 November 2022 on recognising the Russian Federation as a state sponsor of terrorism,

Added:– having regard to the European Council conclusions of 18 December 2025, in particular the sections thereof that relate to Ukraine and security and defence matters,

– having regard to its recommendation of 23 November 2022 to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the new EU strategy for enlargement,

Added:– having regard to the US National Security Strategy, published in November 2025, and to the US National Defence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, adopted by the US Congress,

Added:– having regard to the conclusions of the ninth EU-Lebanon Association Council, held in Brussels on 15 December 2025,

Added:– having regard to its decision of 16 December 2025 to consider the Commission proposal for a Reparations Loan to Ukraine under urgent procedure, as per Rule 170(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

8 unchanged paragraphs

– having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Security and Defence (A10-0265/2025),

A. whereas the EU must be able to protect its citizens; whereas 81 % of EU citizens favour a common security and defence policy, and 69 % are in favour of reinforcing the EU’s defence equipment capacity;

B. whereas the EU’s security environment has deteriorated, and strategic competition is increasing in our Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods and beyond; whereas the EU’s threat assessment should be based on a 360-degree assessment; whereas the EU is facing multifaceted threats that continuously manifest themselves in new ways, making them difficult to anticipate and counter; whereas the Euro-Atlantic, Middle Eastern, African and Indo-Pacific theatres are increasingly interconnected;

C. whereas certain international actors, most notably authoritarian states, are jeopardising European security and stability through a vast set of hybrid tactics that includes, inter alia, cyberattacks, the sabotage of critical infrastructure, economic pressure, food and energy blackmail, the instrumentalisation of migration, subversive political influence and coordinated, continuous attempts to interfere in the democratic functioning of our countries through foreign information manipulation and interference (FIMI), especially in electoral processes; whereas the use of these hybrid tactics by foreign malign actors represent a fully fledged security threat to the EU and its Member States; whereas the EU should include provisions on how to counter these threats as an integral part of its CSDP;

D. whereas Russia and China are increasingly using hybrid tools to undermine the security of the EU; whereas there has been a noticeable increase in violations of the airspace and the territorial waters of EU Member States; whereas terrorism and extremism, not least when financed by foreign powers, require constant attention in order to be countered by the EU and its Member States;

E. whereas in response to the threats it faces, the EU urgently needs to enhance the effectiveness of its foreign, security and defence policy to defend its interests and values within the EU and in the Western Balkans and its immediate Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods; whereas the Eastern Neighbourhood and the Western Balkans are in need of greater EU support, as well as increased defence cooperation, in order to preserve stability and security, especially in terms of the fight against disinformation and hybrid warfare; whereas the security situation in these regions is negatively affected by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which carries the risk of spillover effects;

F. whereas Europe needs to design its security and defence in a comprehensive and multifaceted manner by enhancing conventional military capacities, protecting critical civilian infrastructure, supply chains and energy facilities, countering disinformation and cybersecurity threats and enhancing societal resilience;

Change 1

Added:G. whereas, compared to the 2021 version, the US National Security Strategy (NSS) of 4 December 2025 reflects a radical shift in long-standing US foreign policy, for example in its assessment of the challenges posed by aggressor state Russia and rival China, and includes critical references to alleged democratic shortcomings in certain EU Member States and announces actions akin to foreign interference; whereas the NSS frames global developments largely in terms of economic nationalism and strategic interests, revealing a more transactional approach to traditional allies and thus questioning the principles that have underpinned US foreign policy for decades; whereas the NSS was publicly welcomed by the Kremlin’s spokesperson and met with concern in several EU capitals, raising questions about its impact on transatlantic unity and the credibility of collective deterrence; whereas the NSS groundlessly blames the EU for blocking US efforts to end the war in Ukraine;

Added:H. whereas following the United States’s January 2026 military intervention in Venezuela, the Trump administration reiterated its ambition to annex Greenland, including possibly through military intervention; whereas this represents a fundamental threat to the rules-based international order, the EU’s strategic security interests and the transatlantic alliance, and shows a blatant disdain for fundamental principles of international law, including the principle of non-aggression towards sovereign nations;

9 unchanged paragraphs

I. whereas the European continent is facing the most complex combination of both military and non-military threats as a result of Russia’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine, which has severely endangered the EU’s security and stability; whereas Russia’s allies – China, Iran, Belarus and North Korea, among others – also pose active threats both to Europe and to global peace and security; whereas in September 2025, Russia, together with Belarus and other partner countries, carried out the Zapad military exercises along the EU border;

J. whereas Ukraine needs to be provided with the necessary military capabilities for as long as it takes to end Russia’s illegal war of aggression and to restore its sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders; whereas the Russian invasion of Ukraine is an attack on the rules-based international order and has endangered the current multilateral world order; whereas Ukraine defends not only its sovereignty and territorial integrity, but also overall European security; whereas EU-NATO cooperation has been fundamental in coordinating weapons deliveries to Ukraine;

K. whereas NATO Heads of State and Government, in their Washington Summit Declaration of 10 July 2024, described China as a key enabler of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine; whereas China is expanding its military capabilities, thereby significantly altering the strategic balance in the Indo-Pacific and beyond;

L. whereas the joint White Paper for European Defence Readiness 2030 provides a capability-driven roadmap for Member States and the EU by identifying critical gaps in and priorities for the EU’s security and defence, including air and missile defence, artillery and ammunition, drone and counter-drone systems, cyber and electronic warfare, artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, strategic enablers and the protection of critical infrastructure; whereas the Defence Readiness Roadmap 2030 translates strategic priorities into concrete flagship projects, notably the Eastern Flank Watch, the European Drone Defence Initiative, the European Air Shield and the European Space Shield, which are designed to deliver collective deterrence and resilience by 2030;

M. whereas the EU institutions and the Member States are adopting measures under the Defence Readiness Omnibus, with the aim of scaling up the EU’s defence capabilities and infrastructure to reach the required levels of readiness to prepare for and thereby deter a high-intensity conflict; whereas the Defence Readiness Omnibus package seeks to remove cross-border barriers, simplify licensing and permitting procedures, and incentivise joint innovation, thus laying the foundation for a genuine European defence market and greater industrial scaling;

N. whereas the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) instrument establishes an EU-level facility of up to EUR 150 billion to support collaborative defence procurement, with a view to increasing industrial production capacity and providing pre-financing mechanisms linked to national implementation plans, thereby aiming to reduce duplication and strengthen the EU’s Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB);

O. whereas the current complex geopolitical situation highlights the need to step up efforts to strengthen the EDTIB, notably by building on the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) and its European Defence Projects of Common Interest (EDPCIs); whereas EDIP should be used to its full potential to boost common procurement and ensure reliable access to essential military products to handle potential supply crises; whereas EDPCIs are collaborative industrial projects designed to promote the joint development, production, acquisition and management of strategic military capabilities, while simultaneously strengthening the governance framework for coordinated and efficient defence investments;

P. whereas the EU needs to further boost research, technological development and innovation in the field of security and defence, especially regarding cybersecurity;

Q. whereas military mobility is a strategic pillar of the CSDP and an essential tool for ensuring the EU’s readiness, interoperability and deterrence, particularly along its eastern and southern flanks;