Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Changes between two versions

What changed between the plenary report and the adopted text

From · plenary report· 6 Nov 2025

A-10-2025-0216

on the request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun

To · adopted text· 13 Nov 2025

TA-10-2025-0259

Request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun

AI:What changed, in short

The versions differ only in formal and wording changes; no substantive changes are made.1234

0 changes of substance · 2 formal · 6 of wording only

Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.

Changes of substance · 0

None: the changes are formal or of wording only.

2 formal changes: legal basis, citations, references, corrections

Change 4 Formal

AI summary:Corrects spelling from 'practicing' to 'practising'.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:E. whereas Grzegorz Braun allegedly committed slander against the gynaecologist by imputing to her conduct that could undermine the public trust necessary for practicingpractising as a doctor and by publicly humiliating her, comparing her to a Nazi criminal who murdered children; whereas the alleged action constitutes an offence under Article 212(1) of the Polish Criminal Code;

Change 6 Formal

AI summary:Changes 'points' to 'recitals' in cross-references.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:H. whereas Grzegorz Braun was elected to the European Parliament in the European elections of June 2024; whereas Grzegorz Braun was, therefore, a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offences referred to in pointsrecitals B to F; whereas Grzegorz Braun was not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence referred to in pointrecital G;

6 changes of wording only

Change 1 Wording

AI summary:Rephrases the description of the request's origin and the Member's status, adding the District Public Prosecutor's Office and changing wording.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:A. whereas, by letter dated 2 June 2025, the Prosecutor General of Poland has transmitted a request from the District Public Prosecutor’s Office in Wrocław for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun, submittedMember byof the District PublicEuropean Prosecutor’sParliament Officeelected in Wrocław,Poland, in relationconnection towith several alleged offences that occurred in 2025 and in 2023;

Change 2 Wording

AI summary:Changes 'an offence' to 'the offence' in the description of the alleged deprivation of liberty.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:B. whereas, according to the request, on 16 April 2025, on the premises of the District Hospital in Oleśnica, Grzegorz Braun allegedly, together with other persons, prevented a gynaecologist from leaving her office and carrying out her professional duties at the hospital’s gynaecology and obstetrics ward; whereas the alleged action constitutes anthe offence of deprivation of liberty under Article 189(1) of the Polish Criminal Code;

Change 3 Wording

AI summary:Rephrases the description of the alleged violation of bodily integrity, clarifying that the gynaecologist was entitled to protection.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:C. whereas Grzegorz Braun allegedly violated the bodily integrity of the gynaecologist by pushing and restraining her with his hands during and in connection with the performance of her professional duties at the hospital, includingwhich providingincluded the provision of medical servicesservices; andwhereas enjoyingthe gynaecologist was entitled to the protection provided for public officials in connection with the provision of healthcare services in that facility; whereas the alleged action constitutes an offence under Article 222(1) of the Polish Criminal Code;

Change 5 Wording

AI summary:Rephrases the description of the alleged incitement to hatred, adding 'alleged' and changing grammatical structure.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:G. whereas, on 14 December 2023, Grzegorz Braun allegedly publicly incited, via the internet, to hatred on grounds of religious differences,differences and tothe commitcommission of the offences of interfering with a religious ceremony, as defined in Article 195(1) of the Polish Criminal Code, and of offending religious feelings, as defined in Article 196 of that Code, by giving an interview on social media concerning, among other things, the alleged use of a fire extinguisher on 12 December 2023 in the Sejm of the Republic of Poland to extinguish the candles on a Hanukkah menorah, which in itself constitutes an alleged offence with regard to which Parliament waived his immunity by a decision taken on 6 May 2025; whereas during the interview, and in relation to that event, Grzegorz Braun allegedly made a statement expressing his approval of and publicly encouraging such behaviour, also describing Hanukkah as a satanic and racist celebration which poses a threat to Polish Catholics and which must be countered; whereas the alleged actions constitute an offence under Article 255(1) of the Polish Criminal Code, in conjunction with Article 256(1) and Article 11(2) of that Code;

Change 7 Wording

AI summary:Changes 'any opinion' to 'an opinion' and adds 'a' before 'vote'.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:I. whereas the alleged offences do not constitute, and the subsequent request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun is not related to, anyan opinion expressed or a vote cast by Grzegorz Braun in the performance of his duties within the meaning of Article 8 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union;

Change 8 Wording

AI summary:Rephrases the description of immunity, adding reference to Protocol No 7 and changing 'parliamentary' to 'the'.

Show the text change (1 line)

Changed:M. whereas, in accordance with Rule 5(2) of its Rules of Procedure, parliamentarythe immunity provided for in Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union is not a personal privilege of the Member but a guarantee of the independence of Parliament as a whole, and of its Members;