Changes between two versions
What changed between the plenary report and the adopted text
From · plenary report· 31 Mar 2025
on Parliament’s estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026
To · adopted text· 3 Apr 2025
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European Parliament
AI:What changed, in short
Adds a call for a cooling-off period for former Members and strengthens the position on APAs' participation in missions.1
1 change of substance · 0 formal · 0 of wording only
Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.
Changes of substance · 1
Change 1 Substance
AI summary:Replaces paragraph 40 with two paragraphs: one calls on the Bureau to introduce a cooling-off period for former Members, and another reiterates the call to allow APAs on missions, regretting the Conference of Presidents' decision.
Show the text change (3 lines)
Removed:40. Takes note of the Conference of Presidents’ decisions of March 2025 on the Implementing provisions governing the missions outside the three places of work of the European Parliament; recalls that Parliament has consistently voted in the Plenary since 2018 to consider lifting the overall ban on APAs participating in official delegations and missions;
Added:40. Calls on the Bureau to revise the rules and to introduce a cooling-off period for former Members during which they cannot engage in lobbying or representational activities with the Parliament equal to the time during which Members receive a transitional allowance;
Added:41. Recalls that Parliament has consistently voted in Plenary since 2018 to consider lifting the overall ban on APAs participating in official delegations and missions; regrets that the Conference of Presidents’ decisions of March 2025 on the Implementing provisions governing the missions outside the three places of work of the European Parliament did not align with Plenary's call; maintains its position that APAs should be allowed, under certain conditions, to accompany Members on official delegations and missions; calls on its relevant bodies to amend the relevant articles of its internal rules to allow the participation of APAs in official missions and delegations outside Parliament’s three places of work without further delay;