Changes between two versions
What changed between the plenary report and the adopted text
From · plenary report· 20 Mar 2025
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Mariusz Kamiński
To · adopted text· 1 Apr 2025
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Mariusz Kamiński
AI:What changed, in short
The versions differ in substance by moving the statement that Kamiński was not an MEP at the time of the alleged offence from a standalone recital to an addition in another recital.34 Other changes are wording: minor rephrasing and punctuation adjustments in several recitals.1256
2 changes of substance · 0 formal · 4 of wording only
Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.
Changes of substance · 2
Change 3 Substance
AI summary:Adds a new recital stating that Mariusz Kamiński was not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:C. whereas the above charges were brought against Mariusz Kamiński on 18 April 2024; whereas Mariusz Kamiński was elected to the European Parliament in the European elections in June 2024; whereas Mariusz Kamiński was not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence;
Change 4 Substance
AI summary:Drops the recital that previously stated Mariusz Kamiński was not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence.
Show the text change (1 line)
Removed:D. whereas Mariusz Kamiński was not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offence;
4 changes of wording only
Change 1 Wording
AI summary:Replaces "document" with "documents" in the reference to the hearing of Mariusz Kamiński.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:– having heard Mariusz Kamiński on 30 January 2025 in accordance with Rule 9(6) of its Rules of Procedure and having regard to the documentdocuments submitted by him,
Change 2 Wording
AI summary:Removes repeated phrase "of the Republic of Poland" and adjusts punctuation in the description of the alleged offence.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:B. whereas the request indicates that the actions Mariusz Kamiński is alleged to have engaged in on 21 and 28 December 2023 in Warsaw, with premeditated intent and at short intervals, violated the five-year ban on holding a public position which had been imposed in a final and binding judgment handed down on 20 December 2023 by the Regional Court in Warsaw, insofar as Mariusz Kamiński performed the duties of a Member of the Sejm (the lower house of the Polish Parliament) of the Republic of Poland by participating in the session of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland held on 21 December 2023,2023 which included taking part in votes,votes and taking part in a meeting held by the Sejm’s Administration and Internal Affairs Committee on 28 December 2023; whereas the alleged actions constitute an offence under Article 244 of the Polish Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 12 of that Code;
Change 5 Wording
AI summary:Rephrases the recital on parliamentary immunity, moving "of the Member" and adding "Member's" to clarify it is not a personal privilege.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:I.H. whereas, in accordance with Rule 5(2) of its Rules of Procedure, parliamentary immunity is not a Member’s personal privilege of the Member but a guarantee of the independence of Parliament as a whole, and of its Members;
Change 6 Wording
AI summary:Adds "has" to the statement that Parliament found no evidence of fumus persecutionis.
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:J.I. whereas, in this case, Parliament has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, which is to say factual elements indicating that the intention underlying the legal proceedings in question is to undermine the Member’s political activity in his capacity as a Member of the European Parliament;