Changes between two versions
What changed between the plenary report and the adopted text
From · plenary report· 20 Mar 2025
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Jana Nagyová
To · adopted text· 1 Apr 2025
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Jana Nagyová
AI:What changed, in short
The versions differ only in formal points: punctuation and terminology are updated.123
0 changes of substance · 3 formal · 0 of wording only
Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations and punctuation-only edits are left out; they are under “Every difference”.
Changes of substance · 0
None: the changes are formal or of wording only.
3 formal changes: legal basis, citations, references, corrections
Change 1 Formal
AI summary:Removes a comma after "appeal".
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:A. whereas on 1 July 2024 the High Court in Prague submitted a request for waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Jana Nagyová, a Member of the European Parliament elected in the Czech Republic, with a view to continuing criminal proceedings currently pending before it on appeal,appeal concerning the charge of committing the offence of subsidy fraud pursuant to Section 212(1) and (6), point (a), and the offence of damage to the financial interests of the European Union pursuant to Section 260(1) and (5) of Act No 40/2009 Coll. (the Criminal Code of the Czech Republic);
Change 2 Formal
AI summary:Removes a comma after "person" and replaces "EU" with "Union".
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:B. whereas the criminal proceedings against Jana Nagyová are being conducted on the basis of the indictment of the Municipal State Prosecutor’s Office in Prague, dated 21 March 2022, for an act she allegedly committed jointly with a co-accused person,person on the grounds that she, in her capacity as a person with a professional focus on EUUnion grants and, in the period from 17 January 2008 to 5 January 2010, as vice-chair of the board of directors of a Czech company, applied for a grant knowing that that company was not entitled to it and providing false information that the company was a small enterprise and an independent enterprise;
Change 3 Formal
AI summary:Replaces "proceeding" with "proceedings".
Show the text change (1 line)
Changed:G. whereas in this case, Parliament has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, i.e. factual elements which indicate that the intention underlying the legal proceedingproceedings may be to damage a Member’s political activity and thus the European Parliament;