Amendment 3, after recital M
Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets
B10-0337/2026 – After recital M – Am 3
Rejected
- For
- 204
- Against
- 455
- Abstained
- 3
roll-call vote at 13:12 · 31% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 121 | 0 | 121 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 74 | 0 | 74 | Against |
| EPP | 14 | 159 | 1 | 174 | Against |
| ECR | 77 | 0 | 0 | 77 | For |
| Patriots | 74 | 0 | 0 | 74 | For |
| ESN | 26 | 0 | 0 | 26 | For |
| No group | 13 | 11 | 2 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
662 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 40 MEPs
Greens 50 MEPs
S&D 121 MEPs
Renew 74 MEPs
EPP 174 MEPs
ECR 77 MEPs
Patriots 74 MEPs
ESN 26 MEPs
No group 26 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.