Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, after point v
Recommendation on enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereignty
A10-0035/2026 – Tobias Cremer – § 1, after point v – Am 2
Rejected
- For
- 68
- Against
- 502
- Abstained
- 48
roll-call vote at 13:08 · 11% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 1 | 1 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 9 | 6 | 31 | 46 | Abstained |
| S&D | 8 | 107 | 2 | 117 | Against |
| Renew | 1 | 67 | 0 | 68 | Against |
| EPP | 0 | 164 | 0 | 164 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 70 | 2 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 62 | 0 | 62 | Against |
| ESN | 3 | 17 | 5 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 9 | 8 | 7 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
618 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 40 MEPs
Greens 46 MEPs
S&D 117 MEPs
Renew 68 MEPs
EPP 164 MEPs
ECR 72 MEPs
Patriots 62 MEPs
ESN 25 MEPs
No group 24 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.