Paragraph 67 — part 1 of 2
Public procurement
Lapsed
No count recorded.
roll-call vote
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘emphasises that the Commission should carefully evaluate the potential cost implications, the risks of limiting access to cutting-edge technologies, and the effects on the quality of services and products, while maintaining consistency with the EU’s international legal commitments and not excluding like-minded partners; underlines that any measures to promote the participation of European companies should not amount to protectionism or distort competition;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
0 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.