Amendment 23 — part 1, after paragraph 21
Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market
B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 21 - Am 23/1
Adopted
- For
- 281
- Against
- 193
- Abstained
- 1
roll-call vote at 13:54 · 59% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by EPP
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘proportionate and’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 6 | 21 | 1 | 28 | Against |
| Greens | 1 | 43 | 0 | 44 | Against |
| S&D | 1 | 78 | 0 | 79 | Against |
| Renew | 10 | 46 | 0 | 56 | Against |
| EPP | 109 | 3 | 0 | 112 | For |
| ECR | 61 | 0 | 0 | 61 | For |
| Patriots | 60 | 0 | 0 | 60 | For |
| ESN | 21 | 0 | 0 | 21 | For |
| No group | 12 | 2 | 0 | 14 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
475 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 28 MEPs
Greens 44 MEPs
S&D 79 MEPs
Renew 56 MEPs
EPP 112 MEPs
ECR 61 MEPs
Patriots 60 MEPs
ESN 21 MEPs
No group 14 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.