Amendment 96 — part 1 to article 9, paragraph 1, point b
Preventing plastic pellet losses to reduce microplastic pollution
A9-0148/2024 – João Albuquerque – Article 9, § 1, point b – Am 96/1
Rejected
- For
- 84
- Against
- 511
- Abstained
- 7
roll-call vote at 13:57 · 14% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Greens
The part voted on: ‘take remedial measures to mitigate the negative impacts of the health or environmental consequences,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | For |
| Greens | 1 | 26 | 1 | 28 | Against |
| S&D | 13 | 49 | 0 | 62 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | Against |
| EPP | 1 | 78 | 1 | 80 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | Against |
| Patriots | 3 | 21 | 0 | 24 | Against |
| ESN | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | Divided |
| No group | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
602 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 10 MEPs
Greens 28 MEPs
S&D 62 MEPs
Renew 37 MEPs
EPP 80 MEPs
ECR 23 MEPs
Patriots 24 MEPs
ESN 4 MEPs
No group 5 MEPs
Former MEPs 329 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.