report parliamentary committee draft, 3 June 2025
On the role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security
Document PECH-PR-770111 · (2025/2010(INI))
Committee on Fisheries · Rapporteur: Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral
AI:In short
This is a draft report by the Committee on Fisheries on how social, economic and environmental standards can safeguard fair competition for aquatic food products and improve food security. It calls for mandatory labelling of all aquatic food products on the EU market, including origin, wild-caught or farmed status and nutritional quality. It asks the Commission and member states to close gaps in customs, trade and fisheries agreements so imports meet the same or equivalent standards as EU production, and to harmonise import controls. It seeks stronger support for small-scale and artisanal fisheries and greater autonomy for outermost regions, including re-establishing POSEI-Fisheries. It stresses labour rights, fair wages, safe working conditions, research and innovation, and better use of EU funds for small and medium-sized enterprises.
Position. The rapporteur proposes that Parliament call for mandatory labelling of aquatic food products, harmonised import controls, exclusion of yellow- or red-card countries from tariff quotas, support for small-scale fisheries and outermost regions, and stronger labour, environmental and innovation standards.
Key points
- Emphasises the need for mandatory labelling of all aquatic food products placed on the EU market, distinguishing wild-caught from farmed, stating country or region of origin and nutritional quality, and creating conditions for quality schemes such as geographical indications and protected designations of origin.
- Calls on the Commission to ensure the eCatch system is operational and that member states' national authorities are fully prepared to use it.
- Stresses that under Article 17 of the CFP Regulation member states must use transparent and objective criteria, including environmental, social and economic ones, when allocating fishing opportunities, promoting multiannual allocation and fair distribution, also taking into account small-scale fisheries and coastal communities.
- Calls on the Commission and member states to address gaps in the customs legal framework, sustainable fisheries partnership agreements and EU trade agreements to guarantee a level playing field and ensure imports comply with the same or equivalent standards as EU production.
- Calls on the Commission to harmonise import controls across member states to guarantee the same standards and prevent IUU products from entering the EU.
- Calls on the Commission to exclude countries subject to yellow or red cards from the autonomous tariff quota regime, to avoid downward pressure on EU producers' prices, and to reinforce traceability through measures such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.
- Calls on the Commission to strengthen international cooperation and leadership, especially under the Ocean Pact, engage non-EU countries to align with EU standards and combat IUU fishing, particularly by non-EU fleets in international waters.
- Highlights the EU sector's role in providing nutritious, high-quality seafood for food security and consumers' health, and stresses that economic standards, reduced administrative burdens and legislative simplification are vital for resilient supply chains and stable markets.
- Calls for strengthened financial and policy support for traditional sustainable fisheries and small-scale and artisanal fisheries, and for greater autonomy for outermost regions on funding and legislation, re-establishing POSEI-Fisheries to overcome structural disadvantages.
- Emphasises the role of labour rights, employment of women and young people, fair wages and a safe working environment in ensuring fair and ethical practices in fisheries and aquaculture.
- Calls on member states to invest in research and innovation, make better use of EU funds such as the Cohesion Fund, Horizon Europe and EMFAF, and ensure better access to funding for small and medium-sized enterprises.
- Stresses that innovation is crucial to develop sustainable fishing practices and gear, minimising environmental impact, reducing fuel consumption and bycatches, and increasing the sector's competitiveness.
Who is affected
- EU fisheries and aquaculture producers, who would face the same or equivalent standards as imports.
- Small-scale and artisanal fisheries, which would receive strengthened financial and policy support.
- Outermost regions, which would gain greater autonomy on funding and legislation and a re-established POSEI-Fisheries programme.
- Consumers, who would benefit from mandatory labelling and information on origin, production method and nutritional quality.
- Non-EU countries and fleets, which are asked to align with EU standards and combat IUU fishing, with yellow or red card countries excluded from tariff quotas.
Figures and deadlines
- around 70 % — the EU's dependence on aquatic food imports.
- 55% — the share of consumers citing price as the most significant factor in purchasing decisions for aquatic food in 2024.
- 52 % — the share citing product appearance.
- 10 % — the share of total consumption represented by the EU aquaculture sector.
Legal basis. Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 18 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Full text
Motion for a european parliament resolution 38 paragraphs
(2025/2010(INI))
The European Parliament,
–having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the common fisheries policy (CFP),
–having regard to Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF),
–having regard to its resolution of 19 January 2023 on the small-scale fisheries situation in the EU and future perspectives,
–having regard to its resolution of 18 January 2024 on the impact of illegal fishing on food security – the role of the European Union,
–having regard to the Commission communication of 12 May 2021 entitled ‘Strategic guidelines for a more sustainable and competitive EU aquaculture for the period 2021 to 2030’ (COM(2021)0236),
–having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
–having regard to the Commission communication of 3 May 2022 entitled ‘Putting people first, securing sustainable and inclusive growth, unlocking the potential of the EU’s outermost regions’ (COM(2022)0198) and its resolution of 13 June 2023 on the assessment of the new Commission communication on outermost regions,
–having regard to the Commission communication of 19 February 2025 entitled ‘A Vision for Agriculture and Food – Shaping together an attractive farming and agri-food sector for future generations’ (COM(2025)0075),
–having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
–having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A10-0000/2025),
Read the rest (26 paragraphs)
A.whereas the EU is highly dependent on aquatic food imports (around 70 %) and measures must be urgently implemented to reduce this dependence in order to make full use of the total allowable catches, increase aquaculture production and reduce food waste;
B.whereas the CFP strives to balance economic, social and environmental standards, but frequently falls short of the desired outcome;
C.whereas aquatic food products are a source of high-quality protein with a low environmental footprint;
D.whereas the 2024 Eurobarometer shows a decline in the consumption of aquatic food in the EU, which is mainly attributed to rising prices, leading consumers to opt for cheaper, unhealthier and less nutritious food alternatives;
E.whereas administrative, licensing, spatial planning, social and environmental obligations in the EU are often burdensome and lengthy, which leads to uncertainty, discourages investment, drives up costs, and is unfair when compared to non-EU countries that have trade relations with the EU;
F.whereas illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing presents serious threats to fish stocks, affecting food security and the sustainability of the sector;
G.whereas coastal communities and the outermost regions are more vulnerable to unfair competition and the consequences of climate change, which significantly jeopardise fisheries and the competitiveness of the sector, threaten aquaculture and EU food security, and adversely affect local economies and livelihoods;
Role of standards in fisheries and aquaculture
1.Emphasises the need for mandatory labelling of all aquatic food products placed on the EU market, including a clear distinction between wild-caught and farmed products, as well as their country/region of origin and the nutritional quality of the imported aquatic products, in order to improve traceability, consumer information and fair competition across the sector; highlights the need to create the conditions to implement quality schemes such as geographical indications and protected designations of origin;
2.Calls on the Commission to ensure that the eCatch system is operational and that the Member States’ national authorities are fully prepared to use it;
3.Stresses that, according to Article 17 of the CFP Regulation, the Member States must use transparent and objective criteria, including environmental, social and economic ones, when allocating fishing opportunities, promoting multiannual allocation and fair distribution to ensure stability and predictability for the sector, also taking into account small-scale fisheries and coastal communities;
4.Calls on the Commission and the Member States to address any gaps within the customs legal framework, sustainable fisheries partnership agreements and EU trade agreements in order to guarantee a level playing field for the EU sector and to ensure that all imports comply with the same or equivalent standards as those established for the EU, guaranteeing the competitiveness of the EU sector;
5.Calls on the Commission to harmonise import controls across the Member States in order to guarantee the same standards for aquatic products and to prevent IUU products from entering the EU;
6.Calls on the Commission to exclude countries subject to yellow (after careful consideration) or red cards from benefiting from the autonomous tariff quota regime, which also should not be used to exert downward pressure on EU producers’ prices; emphasises the need to reinforce traceability systems through measures such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive;
7.Calls on the Commission to strengthen international cooperation and leadership, especially under the framework of the Ocean Pact, giving a central role to fisheries and aquaculture, and thus also to aquatic food security; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to take the opportunity to engage with non-EU countries to align with EU standards and combat IUU fishing, particularly by non-EU fleets operating in international waters;
Resilience and food security
8.Highlights the EU sector’s critical role in providing nutritious, high-quality seafood to meet EU food security needs and improve consumers’ health;
9.Emphasises that economic standards, coupled with a reduction in administrative burdens and legislative simplification, are vital for bolstering the resilience of fisheries and aquaculture supply chains, in turn mitigating vulnerabilities to market shocks, including price volatility and supply shortages, while also ensuring a stable market for aquatic food products;
10.Calls for strengthened financial and policy support for traditional sustainable fisheries practices and small-scale and artisanal fisheries; recognises the need to grant greater autonomy to the outermost regions in relation to funding and legislation, re-establishing the programme of options specifically relating to remoteness and insularity (POSEI-Fisheries), which is now integrated into the EMFAF in order to support the sector in overcoming structural disadvantages and ensuring the viability of local fishing communities;
Social, economic and environmental standards
11.Emphasises the crucial role of labour rights, the employment of women and young people, fair wages and a safe working environment in ensuring fair and ethical practices in fisheries and aquaculture;
12.Calls on the Member States to take every opportunity to invest in research and innovation and to make better use of the complementarity of EU funds, such as the Cohesion Fund, Horizon Europe and EMFAF – which is not, in fact, effectively reaching its final beneficiaries – and to ensure better access to funding for small and medium-sized enterprises;
13.Stresses that innovation is crucial to develop sustainable fishing practices and gear, minimising the environmental impact, reducing fuel consumption and bycatches, and in turn increasing the competitiveness of the sector;
°
° °
14.Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
Explanatory statement 10 paragraphs
The ocean provides a healthy, rich, safe, nutritious, high-quality source of protein, which is crucial for European food security, but also to many coastal communities and Outermost Regions, that depends on it for food and economic activities. The European Union (EU) is the world’s second-largest market for fisheries and aquaculture products, and within this context, the EU’s fisheries and aquaculture sectors are vital to ensure a low-carbon and sustainable aquatic food, while also playing a critical role in the EU’s food security and strategic autonomy. Nonetheless, the EU remains 70 % reliant on imports. The Niinistö report recognises food as one of the essential sectors that provide vital services to citizens and asserts that food security, safety, and sovereignty in the EU, are non-negotiable.
The EU’s fisheries sector has been impacted by various events, including Brexit, the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russian aggression against Ukraine, the rising prices of fuel, among others.
As fishing opportunities have remained quite stable for some years, only a full use of the total allowable catches, a strong bet in aquaculture, and reducing food waste could increase the availability of European aquatic food.
To strengthen food security, competitiveness, and support responsible fishing, the EU must actively promote the consumption of sustainably sourced aquatic products. This is especially important given the growing interest in alternative protein sources, otherwise we risk overlooking the established nutritional value of fish in the European diet.
Unfair competition in the sector, especially from third countries, is intensified by social challenges, including contractual conditions and labour issues, and, at a substandard level, safety, hygiene, and working conditions aboard fishing vessels.
In environmental standards, equally critical for the level playing field, and EU should address the sustainable processing methods and gears, with the possibility to use biodegradable and more efficient and advanced ones, that minimise environmental impact and reduces the fuel consumption. Also sustainable fishing practices, such as reducing bycatches and protecting marine habitats. This is essential for the long-term viability of marine resources. IUU fishing remains a serious threat to marine ecosystems, fishing-dependent communities and fishing sector’s reputation and it should require from the EU a zero tolerance approach.
In the economic standards, consumer trends in 2024 indicated a decrease in overall consumption, with price emerging as the most significant factor (55%) influencing purchasing decisions for aquatic food, surpassing product appearance at 52 %. This is why we need to guarantee that all aquatic food products entering in the EU have to respect the same/equivalent standards then the ones we obliged our fishers and producers, in order to not push down the prices, leading the European fishers, producers, industry and enterprises to an unfair competition, but at the same time, safeguarding access to aquatic food and protect consumer health, ensuring efficient use of resources. Strengthening the customs controls in ports and airports and fully utilising, particularly to enhance traceability, the eCatch system outlined in the new Control Regulation, may contribute to the effort for not allowing the entrance in the EU of aquatic products that are not align with European standards, that leads to an unfair competition and artificially lowering prices. It is also essential to register all imports of fisheries products from non-cooperative countries, as this will facilitate the collection of retroactive duties and tariffs in the event of investigations.
To guarantee the high-quality level of aquatic food consumed in the EU, it is essential to incentivise the creation of a stamp to assure equivalent conditions of the European Quality Schemes for imported products, with information about the origin, wild catch or farmed product, the nutritive value, among other requirements.
In the internal market, the EU must promote the consumption of sustainable and/or certified European products, including processed items, and also cut the administrative burden, and complex licencing process to European aquaculture facilities, as this sector only represents 10 % of total consumption and has a possibility to grow. It is also crucial to reinforce the use of quality labels for products caught using artisanal and selective fishing gear and those sourced from small-scale fisheries, thereby highlighting the value of local and traceable products.
A final word to the outermost regions (ORs), as they face unique challenges outlined in Article 349 of the TFEU, and fishing is a major economic driver, contributing to food sovereignty and being an integral part of its culture. It generates jobs both at sea and in industry, while also supporting tourism, which is a key sector. However, fisheries and aquaculture in the ORs faces higher operational costs, including fuel, transport, vessel maintenance and renewal, market access, etc, and one of the solutions is to grant greater autonomy to the ORs article in EMFAF, re-establishing the POSEI – Fisheries, to ensure the competitiveness of the sector and their full integration and participation in the single market.
Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur has received input 4 paragraphs
Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he received input from the following entities or persons in the preparation of the draft report:
| Entity and/or person |
| AIB - ASSOCIAÇÃO DOS INDUSTRIAIS DO BACALHAU |
| AIPCE CEP - European Association of Fish Processors and Traders |
| ANFACO-CECOPESCA e ANICP setor conserveiro de pescado e marisco em Espanha e Portugal |
| Associação Portuguesa de Aquacultores |
| Coalition for Fair Fisheries Arrangements |
| DG Mare - Unit B4 |
| Eurogroup for Animals |
| Federação de Pesca dos Açores e Associação de Comerciantes de Pescados dos Açores |
| Federation of European Aquaculture Producers |
| International Platform of Insects for Food and Feed |
| Marismar - Aquicultura Marinha-Madeira |
| Market Advisory Council |
| Mercadona |
| State Secretary for Fisheries (Portugal) |
The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.
Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament’s Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.