Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

report parliamentary committee draft, 9 March 2026

On the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes

Document LIBE-PR-785296 · (14941/2025 – C100369/2025 – 2025/0231(NLE))

Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs · Rapporteur: Moritz Körner

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

AI:In short

The draft report recommends that Parliament give its consent to the Council decision concluding the UN Convention against Cybercrime on behalf of the EU. It stresses the importance of safeguards in the convention to protect fundamental rights and values during its application. It argues that EU ratification would let the EU shape implementation and promote human rights, democracy, and the rule of law internationally.

Position. The rapporteur recommends that Parliament give its consent to the conclusion of the UN Cybercrime Convention.

Key points

  1. Parliament gives its consent to the conclusion of the UN Cybercrime Convention.
  2. The convention is seen as an important instrument for strengthening international cooperation and reinforcing human rights among parties.
  3. The convention prompted criticism from civil society and service providers regarding protection of fundamental rights and values.
  4. Making use of the safeguards provided in the convention will be key in its application by competent authorities.
  5. EU ratification would allow the EU to take a leading role in shaping implementation and promoting democratic values.
  6. The EU could shape trustworthy international cooperation, preventing abuse of the digital space while enhancing human rights.

Who is affected

  • The European Union and its member states, which would be bound by the convention upon conclusion.
  • Civil society and service providers, who had concerns about fundamental rights protections.

Legal basis. Article 82(1) and (2), Article 83(1), Article 87(2), and Article 218(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Draft european parliament legislative resolution 10 paragraphs

(14941/2025 – C100369/2025 – 2025/0231(NLE))

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

–having regard to the draft Council decision (14941/2025),

–having regard to the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes (12735/25),

–having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 82(1) and (2), Article 83(1) and Article 87(2), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C100369/2025),

–having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4) and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

–having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A100000/2026),

1.Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;

2.Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the United Nations.

Explanatory statement 4 paragraphs

As cybercrime and cyber-enabled offenses escalate at an unprecedented pace, the UN Cybercrime Convention may serve as an important instrument for strengthening international cooperation while reinforcing human rights among its parties. Given the borderless nature of the internet, a comprehensive approach is imperative, one that engages a broad coalition of partners committed to upholding human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. This collective effort is essential to combat online criminal activities effectively and ensure that perpetrators operating in the digital sphere are held accountable.

It should be also mentioned that the convention, as much as it was supported by a broad range of stakeholders, prompted criticism from civil society and service providers, particularly when it comes to ensuring protection of fundamental rights and values. Therefore making use of the safeguards provided in the convention will be key in its application by the competent authorities.

By ratifying the convention, the EU could take a leading role in protecting cyberspace by shaping its implementation. With its strong regulatory framework and commitment to democratic values, the EU is well-positioned to ensure the convention fosters a secure and open digital world while simultaneously promoting such values amongst partners and other parties. Additionally, the EU could shape and endeavour to secure trustworthy international cooperation, preventing abuse of the digital space while enhancing human rights amongst its contracting parties. Upholding robust safeguards is crucial for fostering trust and ensuring an effective global cooperation in criminal matters.

Against this background, the rapporteur recommends the conclusion of the UN Cybercrime Convention.

Annex: declaration of input 4 paragraphs

Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur declares that he included in his report input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that he received, in the preparation of the draft report, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:

1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register
Cybersecurity Tech Accord
Epicenter.works
Microsoft
2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies

The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.

Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.