Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

amendment list, 19 May 2026

Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869

Document ITRE-AM-788924 · (COM(2025)1006 – 2025/0399(COD))

Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

Full text

Jump to an amendment (298)
Text 2,004 paragraphs

Amendment 531

Bruno Tobback

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where Member States apply the exemptions under paragraph 7, they shall ensure that rules on effective mitigation measures to be adopted for the projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in Annex II point (1) are identified based on the National Development Plan, in order to avoid the adverse environmental impact that may arise or, where that is not possible, to significantly mitigate it. Member States shall ensure that the appropriate mitigation measures are applied in a timely manner to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Article 6(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC and Article 4(1), point (a)(i), of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and to avoid deterioration and achieve good ecological status or good ecological potential in accordance with Article 4(1), point (a), of Directive 2000/60/EC.Where Member States apply the exemptions under paragraph 7, they shall ensure that rules on effective mitigation measures to be adopted for the projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in Annex II point (1) are identified based on the National Development Plan, in order to avoid the adverse environmental impact that may arise or, where that is not possible, to significantly mitigate it. Member States shall ensure that the appropriate mitigation measures are applied in a timely manner to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Article 6(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC and Article 4(1), points (a)(i), (b) and (c) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and to avoid deterioration and achieve good ecological status or good ecological potential in accordance with Article 4(1), point (a), of Directive 2000/60/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 532

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where Member States apply the exemptions under paragraph 7, they shall ensure that rules on effective mitigation measures to be adopted for the projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in Annex II point (1) are identified based on the National Development Plan, in order to avoid the adverse environmental impact that may arise or, where that is not possible, to significantly mitigate it. Member States shall ensure that the appropriate mitigation measures are applied in a timely manner to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Article 6(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC and Article 4(1), point (a)(i), of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and to avoid deterioration and achieve good ecological status or good ecological potential in accordance with Article 4(1), point (a), of Directive 2000/60/EC.Where Member States apply the exemptions under paragraph 7, they shall ensure that rules on effective mitigation measures to be adopted for the projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in Annex II point (1) are identified based on the National Development Plan, in order to avoid the adverse environmental impact that may arise or, where that is not possible, to mitigate it. Member States shall ensure that the appropriate mitigation measures are applied in a timely manner to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Article 6(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC and Article 4(1), point (a)(i), of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and to avoid deterioration and achieve good ecological status or good ecological potential in accordance with Article 4(1), point (a), of Directive 2000/60/EC.

Or. en

Read the rest (1,992 paragraphs)

Justification

This amendment removes the requirement to “significantly” mitigate adverse effects, as the term is not clearly defined and could lead to legal uncertainty and inconsistent application across Member States. Greater legal clarity is necessary to avoid unnecessary delays in permit-granting procedures while maintaining effective environmental safeguards.

Amendment 533

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
For projects for which Member States decide to apply exemptions under paragraph 7, the competent authorities shall carry out a screening to identify:For projects for which Member States decide to apply exemptions under paragraph 7, the project promoter shall, in the notification referred to paragraph 5 of Article 10, specify to the competent authorities:

Or. en

Justification

The proposed amendment aims to avoid the risk that the current wording may be interpreted as introducing an additional autonomous screening procedure for projects benefitting from the exemption from Environmental Impact Assessment pursuant to Article 7(7).The reference to a screening carried out by the competent authority may give rise to duplicative environmental verifications, notwithstanding the fact that the relevant impacts have already been assessed at strategic level through the Strategic Environmental Assessment of the National Development Plan.

Amendment 534

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
For projects for which Member States decide to apply exemptions under paragraph 7, the competent authorities shall carry out a screening to identify:For projects for which Member States decide to apply exemptions under paragraph 7, the project promoter shall, in the notification referred to paragraph 5 of Article 10, specify to the competent authorities:

Or. en

Amendment 535

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
This screening referred to in the first subparagraph shall be finalised within 45 days from the notification of the project promoter referred to in paragraph 5 of Article 10.The competent authority shall verify the accuracy of the declaration within 45 days from the notification

Or. en

Amendment 536

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
This screening referred to in the first subparagraph shall be finalised within 45 days from the notification of the project promoter referred to in paragraph 5 of Article 10.The competent authority shall verify the accuracy of the declaration within 45 days from the notification

Or. en

Justification

the project promoter identifies and reports any additional significant environmental effects in the notification referred to in Article 10(5), in line with existing practice.This clarification avoids unintended procedural duplication, reduces the risk of delays in the permitting process, and ensures coherence between Article 7 and Article 10 , while fully preserving the competent authority’s power to require an Environmental Impact Assessment where justified.

Amendment 537

Bruno Tobback, Yannis Maniatis, Nicolás González Casares, Elena Sancho Murillo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
12. Where the screening process identifies a project to be highly likely to give rise to significant unforeseen adverse effects as referred to in paragraph 10 of this Article, the competent authorities shall inform the project promoter that assessments referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 7 of this Article are required and ensure that on the basis of existing data, appropriate and proportionate mitigation measures are applied for these projects to ensure compliance with Articles 12(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC and Article 5 of Directive 2009/147/EC. Where it is not possible to apply such mitigation measures, the competent authorities shall ensure that project promoters adopt appropriate compensatory measures to address those effects, which, if other proportionate compensatory measures are not available, may take the form of a monetary compensation for species protection programmes, in order to secure or improve the conservation status of the species affected.12. Where the screening process identifies a project to be likely to give rise to significant unforeseen adverse effects as referred to in paragraph 10 of this Article, the competent authorities shall inform the project promoter that assessments referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 7 of this Article are required and ensure that on the basis of existing data, appropriate and proportionate mitigation measures are applied for these projects to ensure compliance with Articles 12(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC and Article 5 of Directive 2009/147/EC. Where it is not possible to apply such mitigation measures, the competent authorities shall ensure that project promoters adopt appropriate compensatory measures to promote improved environmental outcomes for the affected speces and habitats, which, if other proportionate compensatory measures are not available, may take the form of a monetary compensation for species protection programmes, in order to secure or improve the conservation status of the species affected.

Or. en

Amendment 538

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 13

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
13. When assessing whether satisfactory alternative solutions to projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation, exist for the purposes of Articles 6(4) and Article 16(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Article 4(7), point (d), of Directive 2000/60/EC and Article 9(1) of Directive 2009/147/EC, the condition of having no satisfactory alternatives shall be fulfilled if there are no satisfactory alternative solutions capable of achieving the same objective of the project in question, in terms of the development of the same capacity through the same technology within the same or similar timeframe and without resulting in significantly higher costs.13. The assessment of whether satisfactory alternative solutions to projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation, exist in the meaning of Articles 6(4) and Article 16(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Article 4(7), point (d), of Directive 2000/60/EC and Article 9(1) of Directive 2009/147/EC, shall be based on the principle of proportionality and the balancing of ecological, economic and social advantages and disadvantages, and it shall be made on the basis of the best available scientific and technical knowledge.

Or. en

Justification

By defining a satisfactory alternative solution as basically an identical project located somewhere else developed within the same time frame, at comparable cost, the proposal de facto deletes one of the cumulative conditions set out in the nature Directives that have to be fulfilled for a project to be able to go ahead even when it has negative impacts on a special area of conservation, and it contradicts ECJ jurisprudence and Commission guidance (see for instance: (2021/C 437/01)

Amendment 539

Bruno Tobback, Yannis Maniatis, Nicolás González Casares, Elena Sancho Murillo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 13

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
13. When assessing whether satisfactory alternative solutions to projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation, exist for the purposes of Articles 6(4) and Article 16(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Article 4(7), point (d), of Directive 2000/60/EC and Article 9(1) of Directive 2009/147/EC, the condition of having no satisfactory alternatives shall be fulfilled if there are no satisfactory alternative solutions capable of achieving the same objective of the project in question, in terms of the development of the same capacity through the same technology within the same or similar timeframe and without resulting in significantly higher costs.13. When assessing whether satisfactory alternative solutions to projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation, exist for the purposes of Articles 6(4) and Article 16(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Article 4(7), point (d), of Directive 2000/60/EC and Article 9(1) of Directive 2009/147/EC, the condition of having no satisfactory alternatives shall be fulfilled if there are no satisfactory alternative solutions capable of achieving the same objective of the project in question, in terms of the development of the same capacity through the same technology within the same or similar timeframe and without resulting in significantly higher economic or socioeconomic costs.

Or. en

Amendment 540

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
14. When implementing compensatory measures for projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation for the purpose of Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Member States may, in justified cases and where it can be reasonably demonstrated that the plan or project would not irreversibly affect the ecological processes essential for maintaining the structure and functions of the site and would compromise the overall coherence of the Natura 2000 network before compensatory measures are put into place, allow for such compensatory measures to be carried out in parallel with the implementation of the project. Member States may allow, in accordance with the precautionary principle, for those compensatory measures to be adapted over time, depending on whether the significant negative effects are expected to arise in the short, medium or long term.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 541

Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler, Virgil-Daniel Popescu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
14. When implementing compensatory measures for projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation for the purpose of Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Member States may, in justified cases and where it can be reasonably demonstrated that the plan or project would not irreversibly affect the ecological processes essential for maintaining the structure and functions of the site and would compromise the overall coherence of the Natura 2000 network before compensatory measures are put into place, allow for such compensatory measures to be carried out in parallel with the implementation of the project. Member States may allow, in accordance with the precautionary principle, for those compensatory measures to be adapted over time, depending on whether the significant negative effects are expected to arise in the short, medium or long term.14. When implementing compensatory measures for projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation, Member States may allow for such compensatory measures to be carried out in parallel with the implementation of the project. Member States may allow, in accordance with the precautionary principle, for those compensatory measures to be adapted over time.

Or. en

Amendment 542

Bruno Tobback, Nicolás González Casares, Elena Sancho Murillo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
14. When implementing compensatory measures for projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation for the purpose of Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Member States may, in justified cases and where it can be reasonably demonstrated that the plan or project would not irreversibly affect the ecological processes essential for maintaining the structure and functions of the site and would compromise the overall coherence of the Natura 2000 network before compensatory measures are put into place, allow for such compensatory measures to be carried out in parallel with the implementation of the project. Member States may allow, in accordance with the precautionary principle, for those compensatory measures to be adapted over time, depending on whether the significant negative effects are expected to arise in the short, medium or long term.14. When implementing compensatory measures for projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation for the purpose of Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Member States may, in justified cases and where it can be reasonably demonstrated that the plan or project would not irreversibly affect the ecological processes essential for maintaining the structure and functions of the site and would compromise the overall coherence of the Natura 2000 network before compensatory measures are put into place, allow for such compensatory measures to be carried out in parallel with the implementation of the project. Member States shall ensure, in accordance with the precautionary principle, for those compensatory measures to be adapted over time, based on the evolution of the negative effects, both expected and actual in the short, medium or long term.

Or. en

Amendment 543

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
14. When implementing compensatory measures for projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation for the purpose of Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Member States may, in justified cases and where it can be reasonably demonstrated that the plan or project would not irreversibly affect the ecological processes essential for maintaining the structure and functions of the site and would compromise the overall coherence of the Natura 2000 network before compensatory measures are put into place, allow for such compensatory measures to be carried out in parallel with the implementation of the project. Member States may allow, in accordance with the precautionary principle, for those compensatory measures to be adapted over time, depending on whether the significant negative effects are expected to arise in the short, medium or long term.14. When implementing compensatory measures for projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation for the purpose of Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Member States may, where it can be reasonably demonstrated that the plan or project would not irreversibly affect the ecological processes essential for maintaining the structure and functions of the site and would compromise the overall coherence of the Natura 2000 network before compensatory measures are put into place, allow for such compensatory measures to be carried out in parallel with the implementation of the project. Member States may allow, in accordance with the precautionary principle, for those compensatory measures to be adapted over time, depending on whether the significant negative effects are expected to arise in the short, medium or long term.

Or. en

Justification

This amendment removes the reference to “justified cases”, as the absence of a clear definition could lead to inconsistent interpretation and unnecessary delays in project implementation. The amendment maintains environmental safeguards while providing greater legal clarity and implementation flexibility for strategic infrastructure projects.

Amendment 544

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) monitoring the development and delays of projects on the Union list within their territory of responsibility, including by receiving and approving reports submitted by project promoters in accordance with Article 5(4) and reporting to the Agency and relevant Groups on the development and delays of projects on the union list located in their territory in accordance with Article 5(5).(e) monitoring the development and delays of projects on the Union list within their territory of responsibility, including by receiving and approving reports submitted by project promoters in accordance with Article 5(4) and reporting to the relevant Groups on the development and delays of projects on the union list located in their territory in accordance with Article 5(5).

Or. fr

Amendment 545

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b – point ii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ii) the national competent authority may establish a working group where all authorities concerned are represented in order to draw up the screening or the detailed schedule for the permit-granting process in accordance with Article 10(9), point (b), and to monitor and coordinate its implementation;(ii) the national competent authority shall establish a working group where all authorities concerned are represented in order to draw up the screening or the detailed schedule for the permit-granting process in accordance with Article 10(9), point (b), and to monitor and coordinate its implementation;

Or. en

Justification

This amendment strengthens coordination among competent authorities by making the establishment of a working group mandatory. Improved administrative coordination is essential to streamline permit-granting procedures, reduce delays and enhance predictability for strategic infrastructure projects.

Amendment 546

Bruno Tobback, Nicolás González Casares, Elena Sancho Murillo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b – point iii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(iii) the national competent authority shall, after consulting the other authorities concerned, establish on a case-by-case basis a reasonable time limit within which the individual decisions shall be issued with the aim to minimise the duration of the process without prejudice to time limits set out in Article 10(1) and (2);(iii) the national competent authority shall, after consulting the other authorities concerned, establish on a case-by-case basis a reasonable time limit within which the individual decisions shall be issued with the aim to minimise the duration of the process without prejudice to time limits set out in Article 10(1) and (2), while ensuring effective public participation is provided for with reasonable timeframes;

Or. en

Amendment 547

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c – point ii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ii) the national competent authority may establish a working group where all authorities concerned are represented in order to draw up the screening or the detailed schedule for the permit-granting process in accordance with Article 10(9), and to monitor and coordinate its implementation;(ii) the national competent authority shall establish a working group where all authorities concerned are represented in order to draw up the screening or the detailed schedule for the permit-granting process in accordance with Article 10(9), and to monitor and coordinate its implementation;

Or. en

Justification

This amendment improves the efficiency and consistency of permit-granting procedures by ensuring structured coordination among the authorities concerned. Enhanced administrative cooperation contributes to faster implementation timelines and greater legal certainty for infrastructure projects of strategic importance.

Amendment 548

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c – point v

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(v) where a Member State chooses the collaborative scheme, it shall inform the Commission of its reasons.deleted

Or. fr

Amendment 549

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
In the case of projects on the Union list that are intrinsically linked to generation assets, such as the projects included in the infrastructure categories provided by points (1)(b) or (h) of Annex II, the national competent authority shall be responsible for coordinating the permit-granting process of the respective project on the Union list with the permitting of the generation assets so that the timelines are cohesive and together aim at the most efficient and timely permitting of all assets related to the project.In the case of projects on the Union list that are intrinsically linked to generation assets, the national competent authority shall be responsible for coordinating the permit-granting process of the respective project on the Union list with the permitting of the generation assets so that the timelines are cohesive and together aim at the most efficient and timely permitting of all assets related to the project.

Or. fr

Amendment 550

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where a project on the Union list is located in the territory of two or more Member States, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final comprehensive decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.Where a project on the Union list foresees the construction of infrastructures physucally crossing the border of at least another Member State is located in the territory of two or more Member States, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final comprehensive decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.

Or. en

Justification

The requirement of a single contact point for Union list project spanning multiple MS is appropriate for pysically integrated cross-border infrastructures (e.g. pipelines), as it enables one authority to coordinate inputs and issue a single authorization. However, this approach is not suitable for project with geographically separate components in different MS (e.g. Co2 import and export hubs connected by ships or trucks). These project can be developed and managed independently, often with misaligned timelines, and a single procedure could create unnecessary delays. The ams should therefore clarify that a single contact point applies only where the infrastructure physically crosses or affects the border of multiple MS or third countries.

Amendment 551

Yannis Maniatis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where a project on the Union list is located in the territory of two or more Member States, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final comprehensive decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.Where a project on the Union list foresees the construction of infrastructures physically crossing the border of at least another Member State, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final comprehensive decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.

Or. en

Amendment 552

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where a project on the Union list is located in the territory of two or more Member States, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final comprehensive decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.Where a project on the Union list foresees the construction of infrastructures physically crossing the border of at least another Member State, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final comprehensive decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.

Or. en

Amendment 553

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where a project on the Union list is located in the territory of two or more Member States, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final comprehensive decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.Where a project on the Union list foresees the construction of infrastructures physically crossing the border of at least another Member State, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final comprehensive decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.

Or. en

Amendment 554

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Barry Andrews, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where a project on the Union list is located in the territory of two or more Member States, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final comprehensive decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.Where a project on the Union list is located in the territory of two or more Member States, their respective national competent authorities shall jointly appoint one of them to act as a unique point of contact, responsible for facilitating the exchange of information between the national competent authorities and other authorities concerned on the permit-granting process, as well as, issuing the final coordinated decisions in cooperation with the other national competent authorities concerned.

Or. en

Justification

While a single point of contact will help accelerate the permit granting process across several jurisdictions, it should be clarified that this can only be issue a coordinated decision, but not a decision on behalf of an authority of another jurisdiction.

Amendment 555

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Member States shall endeavour to provide a joint procedure which facilitates the cooperation between their respective national competent authorities concerned, create procedural synergies and align timelines to facilitate the permit-granting process for projects, particularly with regard to the assessment of environmental impacts, and the public consultations required under Article 9.Member States shall endeavour to provide a joint procedure which facilitates the cooperation between their respective national competent authorities concerned, ensure consistency between regional priorities and the Union's strategic objectives in the area of energy market integration, create procedural synergies and align timelines to facilitate the permit-granting process for projects, particularly with regard to the assessment of environmental impacts, and the public consultations required under Article 9.

Or. ro

Amendment 556

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Upon request from Member States, the Commission shall play the role of a facilitator to support cooperation between concerned national competent authorities. The Commission shall facilitate agreement on a unified joint procedure by providing an opinion and making recommendations on procedural aspects.Upon request from Member States, the Commission shall play the role of a facilitator to support cooperation between concerned national competent authorities. The Commission shall facilitate agreement on a unified joint procedure by providing an opinion and making recommendations on procedural aspects.
To maximize efficiency, Member States are encouraged to adopt a fully integrated scheme as referred to in paragraph 3(a), ensuring a single legally binding decision for energy infrastructure projects.

Or. en

Amendment 557

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
To maximize efficiency, Member States are encouraged to adopt a fully integrated scheme as referred to in paragraph 3(a), ensuring a single legally binding decision for energy infrastructure projects.

Or. en

Amendment 558

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay, Jorge Martín Frías, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5a. The national competent authority shall retain overall responsibility for the organisation, timeline and conduct of the permit-granting process, and for the adoption of the comprehensive decision, in accordance with the applicable national legislation. The cooperation provided for in this Article shall not have the effect of transferring that responsibility to an authority other than another Member State, the Commission or any other Union body.

Or. fr

Amendment 559

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By 24 October 2027, the Member State or national competent authority shall, where necessary, in collaboration with other authorities concerned, publish an updated manual of procedures for the permit-granting process applicable to projects on the Union list to include at least the information specified in point (1) of Annex VI. The manual shall not be legally binding, but it shall refer to or quote relevant legal provisions. The national competent authorities shall, where relevant, cooperate and find synergies with the authorities of neighbouring countries with a view to align timelines and facilitating the permit-granting process for projects, including for the development of the manual of procedures.1. By 24 October 2027, the Member State or national competent authority shall, where necessary, in collaboration with other authorities concerned, publish an updated manual of procedures for the permit-granting process applicable to projects on the Union list to include at least the information specified in point (1) of Annex VI. The manual shall not be legally binding, but it shall refer to or quote relevant legal provisions. The national competent authorities shall, where relevant, cooperate and find synergies with the authorities of neighbouring countries with a view to align timelines and facilitating the permit-granting process for projects, including for the development of the manual of procedures. By 24 October 2028, the European Commission shall publish a recommendation on best practices in permit granting, based on the national manuals of procedure developed by Member States or national competent authorities or on national practices.

Or. en

Justification

The Commission should identify best practices among national practices to support Member States in further improving permit granting processes.

Amendment 560

Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By 24 October 2027, the Member State or national competent authority shall, where necessary, in collaboration with other authorities concerned, publish an updated manual of procedures for the permit-granting process applicable to projects on the Union list to include at least the information specified in point (1) of Annex VI. The manual shall not be legally binding, but it shall refer to or quote relevant legal provisions. The national competent authorities shall, where relevant, cooperate and find synergies with the authorities of neighbouring countries with a view to align timelines and facilitating the permit-granting process for projects, including for the development of the manual of procedures.1. By 24 October 2027, the Member State or national competent authority shall, where necessary, in collaboration with other authorities concerned, publish an updated manual of procedures for the permit-granting process applicable to projects on the Union list to include at least the information specified in point (1) of Annex VI. The manual shall not be legally binding, but it shall refer to or quote relevant legal provisions. The manual shall be made available through a single digital portal or, where such a portal does not yet exist, through a single publicly accessible website. The national competent authorities shall, where relevant, cooperate and find synergies with the authorities of neighbouring countries with a view to align timelines and facilitating the permit-granting process for projects, including for the development of the manual of procedures.

Or. en

Amendment 561

Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The project promoter shall, within an indicative period of three months following the start of the permit-granting process pursuant to Article 10(5), draw up and submit a concept for public participation to the national competent authority, following the process outlined in the manual referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and in accordance with the guidelines set out in Annex VI.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 562

Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler, Virgil-Daniel Popescu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The national competent authority shall request modifications or approve the concept for public participation within three months of receipt of the concept, taking into consideration, without the need for repetition, of any form of public participation and consultation that took place before the start of the permit-granting process, to the extent that such public participation and consultation has fulfilled the requirements of this Article.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 563

Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler, Virgil-Daniel Popescu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the project promoter intends to make significant changes to an approved concept for public participation, it shall inform the national competent authority thereof. In that case the national competent authority may request additional modifications.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 564

Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 565

Bruno Tobback, Nicolás González Casares, Elena Sancho Murillo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU.5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU, and shall be carried out even if a project has been exempted from performing environmental impact assessments.

Or. en

Amendment 566

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU.5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, at least three months before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 567

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU.5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one public consultation. The public consultation shall be carried out before the permitting decision is taken by the national competent authority and may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU

Or. en

Amendment 568

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU.5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one public consultation. The public consultation shall be carried out before the permitting decision is taken by the national competent authority and may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 569

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU.5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one public consultation. The public consultation shall be carried out before the permitting decision is taken by the national competent authority and may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU.

Or. en

Justification

Co2 transport infrastructure presents distinctive characteristics compared to traditional linear energy assets. In the context of CCS project, the cross-border dimension can be in two different ways: 1) a physically connection between two MS; 2) a non-physical crossborder connection. While physically integrated infrastructures require strong coordination and early public consultation to ensure social acceptance and alignement of permitting timelines, non-physical CCS project involve limited interaction with multiple local territories. In these cases, public engagement should be proportionate to the project's characteristics. However, making early consultation mandatory risk creating inconsistencies with this flexibility and may lead to duplication in MS where national frameworks already ensure effective public agreement, potentially extending permitting timelines without added value.

Amendment 570

Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The public consultation required in the previous paragraph shall comply with the minimum requirements set out in point (5) of Annex VI and shall inform the stakeholders referred to in point (3)(a) of Annex VI about the project at an early stage and shall help to identify the most suitable location, trajectory or technology, including, where relevant, in view of adequate climate adaptation and security considerations for the project, all impacts relevant under Union and national law, and the relevant issues to be addressed in the application file.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 571

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The public consultation required in the previous paragraph shall comply with the minimum requirements set out in point (5) of Annex VI and shall inform the stakeholders referred to in point (3)(a) of Annex VI about the project at an early stage and shall help to identify the most suitable location, trajectory or technology, including, where relevant, in view of adequate climate adaptation and security considerations for the project, all impacts relevant under Union and national law, and the relevant issues to be addressed in the application file.6. The public consultation required in the previous paragraph shall comply with the minimum requirements set out in point (5) of Annex VI and shall inform the stakeholders referred to in point (3)(a) of Annex VI about the project at an early stage and shall help to identify alternatives, the most suitable location, trajectory or technology, including, where relevant, in view of adequate climate mitigation and climate adaptation and security considerations for the project, all impacts relevant under Union and national law, and the relevant issues to be addressed in the application file.

Or. en

Amendment 572

Andrea Wechsler, Christian Ehler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Without prejudice to the procedural and transparency rules in Member States, the project promoters shall publish on the website referred to in paragraph 10 a report summarising the results of activities related to public participation as regards the project including any activities pre-dating the early public consultation, and explaining how the opinions expressed in the public consultations were taken into account, showing the amendments made in the location, trajectory and design of the project, or providing reasons why such opinions have not been taken into account.deleted
The project promoter shall submit the report together with the application file to the national competent authority. The comprehensive decision shall take due account of the result of this report.

Or. en

Amendment 573

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The project promoter shall submit the report together with the application file to the national competent authority. The comprehensive decision shall take due account of the result of this report.The project promoter shall submit the report together with the application file to the national competent authority. The comprehensive decision shall take due account of the result of this report and of the opinions expressed in the the public consultations.

Or. en

Amendment 574

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. For cross-border projects involving two or more Member States, the public consultations carried out pursuant to paragraph 5 in each of the Member States concerned shall, to the extent possible, take place within a period of no more than two months from each other, and, where possible, be combined.8. For cross-border projects involving two or more Member States, the public consultations carried out pursuant to paragraph 5 in each of the Member States concerned shall, to the extent possible, take place within a period of no more than two months from each other, and, where possible, be combined, and the conclusions will be translated into the languages of each Member State in order to facilitate public access in the other states to consultations in neighbouring countries.

Or. ro

Amendment 575

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay, Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 10

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
10. The project promoter shall establish and regularly update a dedicated project website with relevant information about the project of common interest, which shall be linked to the Commission website and the transparency platform referred to in Article 26 and which shall meet the requirements specified in point (6) of Annex VI. National competent authorities shall check the fulfilment of this obligation by the project promoters and take measures ensuring compliance where necessary.10. The project promoter shall establish and regularly update a dedicated project website with relevant information about the project of common interest, which shall be linked to the Commission website and the transparency platform referred to in Article 26 and which shall meet the requirements specified in point (6) of Annex VI. The relevant information referred to above shall include the updated overall project cost, the beneficiaries, any tariff impacts for consumers, the proportion financed using public funds, and any private investors. National competent authorities shall check the fulfilment of this obligation by the project promoters and take measures ensuring compliance where necessary.

Or. fr

Amendment 576

Angelika Winzig

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 10

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
10. The project promoter shall establish and regularly update a dedicated project website with relevant information about the project of common interest, which shall be linked to the Commission website and the transparency platform referred to in Article 26 and which shall meet the requirements specified in point (6) of Annex VI. National competent authorities shall check the fulfilment of this obligation by the project promoters and take measures ensuring compliance where necessary.10. The project promoter shall establish and regularly update a dedicated project website with relevant information about the project of common interest, which shall be linked to the Commission website and the transparency platform referred to in Article 26 and which shall meet the requirements specified in point (6) of Annex VI. Commercially sensitive information shall be treated as confidential. National competent authorities shall check the fulfilment of this obligation by the project promoters and take measures ensuring compliance where necessary.

Or. en

Amendment 577

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) the optional pre-application procedure, covering the period between the start of the permit-granting process and the acceptance of the submitted complete application file by the national competent authority, which shall take place within a maximum period of 24 months;(a) the optional pre-application procedure, covering the period between the start of the permit-granting process and the acceptance of the submitted complete application file by the national competent authority, which shall take place within a maximum period of 18 months;

Or. en

Justification

Shorter timelines and faster permitting procedures are necessary to improve predictability, investment certainty, accelerate infrastructure deployment and strengthen the timely delivery of projects contributing to the Union’s energy security and decarbonisation objectives.

Amendment 578

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the mandatory statutory permit-granting procedure, covering the period from the date of acceptance of the submitted complete application file until the date of the comprehensive decision, which shall not exceed 18 months.(b) the mandatory statutory permit-granting procedure, covering the period from the date of acceptance of the submitted complete application file until the date of the comprehensive decision, which shall not exceed 12 months.

Or. en

Justification

Shorter timelines and faster permitting procedures are necessary to improve predictability, investment certainty, accelerate infrastructure deployment and strengthen the timely delivery of projects contributing to the Union’s energy security and decarbonisation objectives.

Amendment 579

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
With regard to the first subparagraph, point (b), where possible, Member States may provide for a statutory permit-granting procedure that is shorter than 18 months.With regard to the first subparagraph, point (b), where possible, Member States may provide for a statutory permit-granting procedure that is shorter than 12 months.

Or. en

Justification

Shorter timelines and faster permitting procedures are necessary to improve predictability, investment certainty, accelerate infrastructure deployment and strengthen the timely delivery of projects contributing to the Union’s energy security and decarbonisation objectives.

Amendment 580

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The national competent authority shall ensure that the combined duration of the two procedures referred to in paragraph 1 does not exceed a period of 42 months.The national competent authority shall ensure that the combined duration of the two procedures referred to in paragraph 1 does not exceed a period of 36 months.

Or. en

Justification

Shorter timelines and faster permitting procedures are necessary to improve predictability, investment certainty, accelerate infrastructure deployment and strengthen the timely delivery of projects contributing to the Union’s energy security and decarbonisation objectives.

Amendment 581

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
However, where the national competent authority considers that one or both of the procedures will not be completed within the time limits set out in paragraph 1, it may extend one or both of those time limits before their expiry and on a case-by-case basis. The national competent authority shall not extend the combined duration of the two procedures for more than six months other than in exceptional circumstances.However, where the national competent authority considers that one or both of the procedures will not be completed within the time limits set out in paragraph 1, it may extend one or both of those time limits before their expiry and on a case-by-case basis. The national competent authority shall not extend the combined duration of the two procedures for more than nine months other than in exceptional circumstances.

Or. en

Amendment 582

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
However, where the national competent authority considers that one or both of the procedures will not be completed within the time limits set out in paragraph 1, it may extend one or both of those time limits before their expiry and on a case-by-case basis. The national competent authority shall not extend the combined duration of the two procedures for more than six months other than in exceptional circumstances.However, where the national competent authority considers that one or both of the procedures will not be completed within the time limits set out in paragraph 1, it may extend one or both of those time limits before their expiry and on a case-by-case basis. The national competent authority shall not extend the combined duration of the two procedures for more than nine months other than in exceptional circumstances.

Or. en

Justification

Maintaining a longer maximum extension period therefore increases predictability and investment certainty, allowing the permitting procedure to be completed within a single continuous process. This supports timely infrastructure delivery while preserving the exceptional nature of extensions and the obligation for the competent authority to duly justify and communicate their use.

Amendment 583

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) the lack of reply by the national competent authorities within the deadline established in paragraph 2 results in the comprehensive decision to be considered as approved;(a) the lack of reply by the national competent authorities within the deadline established in paragraph 2 results in the comprehensive decision to be considered as rejected;

Or. fr

Amendment 584

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the lack of reply by other authorities concerned within the reasonable time limit established by a national competent authority in accordance with Article 8(3), results in their specific opinion, authorisation or permit to be considered as granted or answered positively.(b) the lack of reply by other authorities concerned within the reasonable time limit established by a national competent authority in accordance with Article 8(3), results in their specific opinion, authorisation or permit to be considered as rejected.

Or. fr

Amendment 585

Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
This paragraph does not produce effects for environmental decisions, and where the principle of administrative tacit approval does not exist in the legal system of the Member State concerned.This paragraph does not produce effects for environmental decisions, and where the principle of administrative tacit approval does not exist in the legal system of the Member State concerned. The principle of tacit approval shall be extended to apply to environmental assessments and final administrative decisions where provided for by national law, to ensure that the strict deadlines established in this Regulation are respected.

Or. en

Amendment 586

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
This paragraph does not produce effects for environmental decisions, and where the principle of administrative tacit approval does not exist in the legal system of the Member State concerned.This paragraph does not produce effects for environmental decisions, and where the principle of administrative tacit approval does not exist in the legal system of the Member State concerned. The principle of tacit approval shall be extended to apply to environmental assessments and final administrative decisions where provided for by national law, to ensure that the strict deadlines established in this Regulation are respected.

Or. en

Amendment 587

András Gyürk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. The national competent authorities shall take into consideration, in the screening for establishing the requirements for the permit-granting process, any studies conducted and permits or authorisations issued up to five years before the project entered the permit-granting process in accordance with this Article, including assessments conducted for the deployment of other projects that are relevant and can be reused, and shall not require unnecessary or duplicate studies, assessments, permits or authorisations.7. The national competent authorities shall take into consideration, in the screening for establishing the requirements for the permit-granting process, any studies conducted and permits or authorisations issued up to five years before the project entered the permit-granting process, provided that the data used during the impact assessment process covers at least one full year, in accordance with this Article, including assessments conducted for the deployment of other projects that are relevant and can be reused, and shall not require unnecessary or duplicate studies, assessments, permits or authorisations.

Or. en

Amendment 588

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. The national competent authorities shall take into consideration, in the screening for establishing the requirements for the permit-granting process, any studies conducted and permits or authorisations issued up to five years before the project entered the permit-granting process in accordance with this Article, including assessments conducted for the deployment of other projects that are relevant and can be reused, and shall not require unnecessary or duplicate studies, assessments, permits or authorisations.7. The national competent authorities shall take into consideration, in the screening for establishing the requirements for the permit-granting process, any studies conducted and permits or authorisations, including assessments conducted for the deployment of other projects that are relevant and can be reused, and shall not require unnecessary or duplicate studies, assessments, permits or authorisations.

Or. en

Justification

The removal of the five-year time limit is intended to ensure a more proportionate and efficient application of the principle of reusing existing studies, permits and assessments. The relevance and usability of previous studies depend on their technical validity and on the absence of substantial changes in the regulatory or environmental context, rather than on a rigid temporal criterion. Maintaining an automatic five-year limit may result in the unnecessary duplication of analyses that remain valid and technically up to date, thereby creating unjustified administrative burdens and delays.

Amendment 589

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article -11 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article-11
Independent European System Planner
1. By [one year after entry into force] the Commission shall set up an Independent European System Planner (ìthe Planner') as a permanent and independent body to be established pursuant to this Article.
2. The Planner shall act independently, objectively, and in the interest of the Union. It shall ensure the full achievement of the Union climate and energy targets for 2030 and 2040 and of climate neutrality by 2050 at the latest.
3. The governing board of the Planner shall include representatives of the Commission, the Parliament, the Member States, the Agency and the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change. Representation shall be balanced and participants shall have equal rights in decision making.
The governing board shall approve the central scenarios referred to in Article 11 of this Regulation, before transmitting it to the Commission.
4.The tasks of the Planner shall be to:
(a) collect and aggregate data from national regulatory authorities, system operators and other stakeholders to draw up the central scenarios and its underpinning methodology referred to in Article 11 of this Regulation;
(b) develop the infrastructure needs report referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation;
(c) be consulted on the system wide-cost benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation;
(d) contribute, though its representatives, to drawing up regional lists of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest, and provide an opinion on the draft Union list referred to in Article 3 of this Regulation.
5. In carrying out the tasks defined in paragraph 4, the Planner shall take autonomous decisions, independently of private and corporate interests.
6. The Planner shall ensure that the public and any interested parties are given objective, reliable and easily accessible information with regard to its work.

Or. en

Amendment 590

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Central scenario for the ten-year network development plansdeleted

Or. fr

Amendment 591

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Central scenario for the ten-year network development plansScenarios for the ten-year network development plans and for the Union List

Or. en

Amendment 592

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Central scenario for the ten-year network development plansCentral scenarios for the ten-year network development plans

Or. en

Justification

The central scenario exercise should include a reference scenario and at least two variations (the 'NECP scenario' and the 'Trends and projections scenario').

Amendment 593

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Central scenario for the ten-year network development plansUnion strategic scenario

Or. en

Amendment 594

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Borys Budka, Mirosława Nykiel

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Central scenario for the ten-year network development plansScenarios for the ten-year network development plans

Or. en

Amendment 595

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Central scenario for the ten-year network development plansScenarios for the ten-year network development plans

Or. en

Amendment 596

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four two years thereafter, the Commission European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH) shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors.
ACER, after having conducted an extensive consultation process involving the Commission, the Member States, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, the EU DSO entity and at least the organisations representing associations involved in electricity, gas and hydrogen markets, heating and cooling, carbon capture and storage and carbon capture and utilisation stakeholders, independent aggregators, demand-response operators, organisations involved in energy efficiency solutions, energy consumer associations and civil society representatives, shall submit updated framework guidelines for the joint scenarios to be developed by ENTSO for Electricity, ENTSO for Gas and ENNOH to the Commission for approval. The Commission shall within one month approve the draft framework guidelines or request amendments, in which case ACER shall submit an amended version to the Commission within one month. Following Commission approval ACER shall publish the framework guidelines.
Those guidelines shall be regularly updated as found necessary and at least every four years.
This central scenario shall be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in:
i. Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943;
ii. Articles 32 and 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789;
iii. the infrastructure needs identification and system assessment processes referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation;
iv. the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation;
v. the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.
The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall publish and submit the draft central scenario to the European Commission. Within three months after the publication of the draft central scenario, taking into account the opinion of the TEN-E group, the European Commission shall approve the draft central planning scenario or request the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH to amend it. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall provide reasons explaining how any request for amendments from the Commission has been addressed. Any amendments should respect the technology neutrality principle.

Or. en

Amendment 597

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. By [two years after entry into force] and every two years thereafter, the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH) shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors.
ACER, after having conducted an extensive consultation process involving the Commission, the Member States, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, the EU DSO entity and at least the organisations representing associations involved in electricity, gas and hydrogen markets, heating and cooling, carbon capture and storage and carbon capture and utilisation stakeholders, independent aggregators, demand-response operators, organisations involved in energy efficiency solutions, energy consumer associations and civil society representatives, shall submit updated framework guidelines for the joint scenarios to be developed by ENTSO for Electricity, ENTSO for Gas and ENNOH to the Commission for approval. The Commission shall within one month approve the draft framework guidelines or request amendments, in which case ACER shall submit an amended version to the Commission within one month. Following Commission approval ACER shall publish the framework guidelines. Those guidelines shall be regularly updated as found necessary and at least every four years.
This central scenario shall be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Articles 32 and 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification and system assessment processes referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall publish and submit the draft central scenario to the European Commission. Within three months after the publication of the draft central scenario, taking into account the opinion of the TEN-E group, the European Commission shall approve the draft central planning scenario or request the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH to amend it. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall provide reasons explaining how any request for amendments from the Commission has been addressed. Any amendments should respect the technology neutrality principle.

Or. en

Amendment 598

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. By [two years after entry into force] and every two years thereafter, the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH) in consultation with the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors.
ACER, after having conducted an extensive consultation process involving the Commission, the Member States, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, the EU DSO entity and at least the organisations representing associations involved in electricity, gas and hydrogen markets, heating and cooling, carbon capture and storage and carbon capture and utilisation stakeholders, independent aggregators, demand-response operators, organisations involved in energy efficiency solutions, energy consumer associations and civil society representatives, shall submit updated framework guidelines for a central scenario to be developed by ENTSO for Electricity, ENTSO for Gas and ENNOH and in consultation with EU DSO to the Commission for approval. The Commission shall within one month approve the draft framework guidelines or request amendments, in which case ACER shall submit an amended version to the Commission within one month. Following Commission approval ACER shall publish the framework guidelines.
Those guidelines shall be regularly updated as found necessary and at least every four years.
The central scenario shall to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Articles 32 and 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification and system assessment processes referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Justification

Strengthening the Commission's role in creating a central scenario and a gap-filling mechanism may limit the influence of national regulators and operators on planning network development in the national electricity system, including by imposing top-down solutions preferred by the Commission. Such process would overlook the local needs in network development plans, and decrease role of NRAs and system operators having the best knowledge of network planning assumptions. MS must retain political decision-making, TSOs provide technical expertise and EC ensure coordination within TEN-E groups.

Amendment 599

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. The European Commission shall publish guidelines for the preparation of the European Scenarios. For the preparation of these guidelines the Commission shall consult the Member States, the ENTSO for electricity, ENTSO for gas and ENNOH.
By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, ENTSO-E, ENTSO-G and ENNOH in close cooperation with Member States shall develop scenarios for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.
Member States, national regulatory authorities and transmission system operators shall have the right to review, approve and request amendments to the input data, modelling assumptions, methodologies and parameters in such scenarios. The Commission shall ensure that the development of such scenarios duly takes into account national energy policy priorities, technical feasibility, and the need for flexibility to reflect national circumstances and emerging challenges.

Or. en

Amendment 600

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. The European Commission shall, within a year from the date of entry into force of the regulation, publish guidelines for the preparation of European scenarios. For the preparation of such guidelines, the European Commission shall consult ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas as well the Member States. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, ENTSO-E and ENTSOG shall develop, in cooperation with ENNOH, several scenarios (at least three) for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 60 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 601

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. No later than 30 September 2029 and every two years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a main scenario and at least two variation scenarios for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the establishment of the Union List referred to in Article 3 and the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation. At least a main scenario and two additional scenarios shall be developed. The scenarios shall replace the scenarios developed under Regulation (EU) 2022/869 by ENTSO-E and ENTSO-G for the TYNDP process.

Or. en

Justification

More frequent scenario updates are proposed to respond to market and policy developments on European and national level. Introducing mandatory additional scenarios and sensitivity analyses for a more robust instrument for infrastructure planning.

Amendment 602

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. By [three years after entry into force] and at least every two years thereafter, the Commission, in close cooperation with the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the Agency and the Member States shall develop a Union strategic scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors and CO₂ transport and storage. The Commission shall lead and coordinate that process.

Or. en

Justification

Close cooperation with ENTSO for Electricity, ENNOH, ENTSO for Gas, the Agency and Member States ensures that the scenario is based on technical expertise and system realities and aligned with the Union’s energy and climate objectives. Early and continuous involvement of all relevant actors throughout the process is necessary to ensure a more coordinated, realistic and implementable development of the scenario across the interconnected energy systems. A coordinating role for the Commission is necessary to ensure consistent Union-wide infrastructure planning across the electricity, hydrogen, gas and CO2 sectors.

Amendment 603

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Planner shall develop a reference scenario and at least two variations for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation, and the establishment of the Union list of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest referred to in Article 3 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Justification

The central scenarios should be developed by the IESP rather than by the Commission itself. It is important to develop one reference scenario that is used for the PCI selection process, the infrastructure needs assessment, the cost benefit-analysis and the cross-border cost allocation; however two variations of the reference scenario should be developed to take the NECPs and trends and projections based on current implemented policies in Member States into account.

Amendment 604

Christophe Grudler, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission, in cooperation with ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH and the ENTSO for Gas, shall develop at least three scenarios reflecting different and contrasted possible pathways for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 605

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. By [two years after entry into force] and every years thereafter, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for gas anche the ENNOH, under supervision of the Commission guaranteeing the tecnology neutrality principle, shall develop a draft central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Justification

The current governance structure provides a right balance on the role of supervisory bodies and infrastructure operators as subjects responsible to built and operate infrastructure, knowing actual possibilities and technical constraints. Shifting the responsbility to the Commission introduce the risk of scenario-building process, that weaken the direct involvement of system operator who understand the technical constraints of infrastructure.

Amendment 606

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every two years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors and, if appropriate, relevant sensitivities to be used for establishment of the Union list referred to in Article 3 and for the the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943, Articles 32, 59 and 60 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Justification

The development of the central scenario should be more frequent to take into account the policy changes and market developments.

Amendment 607

Angelika Winzig

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen, gas, heating and cooling, and CO₂ sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 608

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. Every two years, ENTSO-E, ENNOH and ENTSOG shall develop a draft central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 609

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.1. Every two years, ENTSO-E, ENNOH and ENTSOG shall develop a draft central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Justification

The current governance structure provides a right balance on the roles of supervisory bodies and infrastructure operators as subjects responsible to build and operate infrastructure, knowing actual possibilities and technical constraints. The proposed model departs significantly from the established bottom-up approach to infrastructure planning and scenario development, which has so far respected Member States’ competences on energy security and energy mix choices, while ensuring transparent, structured processes with full stakeholder consultation. Shifting the responsibility to the Commission introduces the risk of scenario‑building process, that weaken the direct involvement of system operators who understand the technical constraints of infrastructures, having the responsibilities to build and operate them, and who are the only actors working closely alongside stakeholders involved in the whole value chain across upstream, midstream and downstream. Involvement of Member States and infrastructure operators is essential to build realistic scenarios, based on industries and citizens’ needs. Finally, it’s crucial to keeping the two-years cycle for the scenarios: a four-year cycle could be too long to represent up-to-date, realistic energy system evolutions.

Amendment 610

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall publish and submit the draft central scenario to the European Commission, and the TEN-E Group and ACER for their opinion Within three months after the publication of the draft central scenario, and following the opinion of the TEN-E group and opinion of ACER on compliance of the scenarios with framework guidelines, the European Commission shall approve the draft central planning scenario or request the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH to amend it. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall provide reasons explaining how any request for amendments from the Commission has been addressed. Any amendments should respect the technology neutrality principle.

Or. en

Amendment 611

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis, Martin Hojsík

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. The main scenario shall be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective.
The additional scenarios and sensitivities shall consider the actual progress towards delivering Member States’ national and energy climate plans. They shall include observed evolution of supply and demand, on the basis of available evidence as well as on the basis of policies supported by concrete implementation measures.
The additional scenarios and sensitivities shall in particular cover variations in: :
– demand in each sector and electrification pathways;
– renewable deployment trajectories in each sector;
– supply availabilities in each sector;
– energy efficiency developments;
– fuel prices and technology cost assumptions.

Or. en

Justification

Introducing mandatory additional scenarios and sensitivity analyses for a more robust instrument for infrastructure planning.

Amendment 612

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The central scenario shall:2. The Union strategic scenario shall contain (i) an initial scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors and CO₂ transport and storage sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 60 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation and (ii) a comprehensive scenario.

Or. en

Justification

Replacing “central scenario” with “Union strategic scenario” better reflects the broader scope and strategic nature of the exercise, which goes beyond a purely technical modelling scenario and progressively integrates infrastructure, resilience, financing and cross-sector planning elements. The initial scenario is needed at an early stage to provide a common basis for the infrastructure needs identification report, cost-benefit methodologies and related planning procedures, while the comprehensive scenario subsequently integrates additional elements such as resilience risks, cross-sector interdependencies, implementation phases and financing needs necessary for a more complete long-term assessment. The final Union strategic scenario would therefore bring together the different elements provided for under this Regulation into a single comprehensive strategic exercise, improving the coherence and long-term visibility of Union infrastructure planning.

Amendment 613

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The central scenario shall:2. The reference scenario referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall:

Or. en

Amendment 614

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The central scenario shall:2. The draft central scenario shall:

Or. en

Amendment 615

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The central scenario shall:2. The draft central scenario shall

Or. en

Amendment 616

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The central scenario shall:2. In addition, scenarios shall:

Or. en

Amendment 617

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Borys Budka, Mirosława Nykiel

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The central scenario shall:2. The scenarios shall:

Or. en

Amendment 618

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The central scenario shall:2. The scenarios shall:

Or. en

Amendment 619

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Moved to paragraph [1a] - applying to main scenario

Amendment 620

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, András Gyürk, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective, while taking into account security of supply, affordability, technological neutrality, national and regional specificities;

Or. en

Amendment 621

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;(a) include a mid-term and long-term perspective;

Or. en

Amendment 622

Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy;

Or. en

Amendment 623

Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;(a) be consistent with the Union’s energy needs and include a mid-term and long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s target of climate neutrality as well as it long-term energy needs;

Or. en

Justification

It is of utmost importance that the central scenario is consistent with the energy needs and not simply the targets for the sake of preserving industrial competitiveness as well as the viability of SMEs, digital development and the purchasing power of citizens.

Amendment 624

Bruno Tobback, Yannis Maniatis, Daniel Attard, Nicolás González Casares, Elena Sancho Murillo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate, and electrification and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;

Or. en

Amendment 625

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a mid term and long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;

Or. en

Justification

For consistancy with am. to par.1

Amendment 626

András Gyürk, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;(a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective;

Or. en

Amendment 627

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) be consistent with the latest National Energy and Climate Plans or any other relevant national scenario document approved by the respective Member State or the National Regulatory Authority;

Or. en

Amendment 628

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) be consistent with the latest National Energy and Climate Plans or any other relevant national scenario document approved by the respective Member State or the National Regulatory Authority;

Or. en

Amendment 629

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) take into consideration an increased Union economy-wide electrification rate that is compatible with the transition to a highly-efficient and 100% renewables-based economy by 2040;

Or. en

Justification

Going beyond the 'NECP scenario' and the 'Trends and projection' scenario, the reference scenario should show a sufficient level of ambition to complete the energy transition by accelerating on energy efficiency, renewables and electrification, in line with the target put forward by the Electrification Action Plan and its legislative follow-up and the review of Regulation of the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action.

Amendment 630

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Borys Budka, Mirosława Nykiel

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) respect the diversity of national energy mixes and planning choices as reflected in Member States' national energy and climate plans;

Or. en

Amendment 631

Tsvetelina Penkova, Giorgio Gori, Daniel Attard, Annalisa Corrado

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) respect the diversity of national energy mixes and planning choices as reflected in Member States’ national energy and climate plans;

Or. en

Amendment 632

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) respect the diversity of national energy mixes and planning choices as reflected in Member States’ national energy an climate plans;

Or. en

Amendment 633

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) respect the diversity of national energy mixes and planning choices carried out by Member States:

Or. en

Amendment 634

Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) respect the diversity of national energy mixes and planning choices;

Or. en

Amendment 635

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) be consistent with the national energy and climate plans

Or. en

Justification

The central scenario should be consistent with NECPs, to ensure that networks are not a bottleneck to achieving EU's energy and climate goals.

Amendment 636

Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a b) be consistent with the aim to increase the interconnection levels of the Member States and regions more isolated and below the interconnection targets established in Regulation (EU) 2018/1999.

Or. en

Amendment 637

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a b) consider the joint scenarios developed in line with Article 55 of Directive (EU) 2024/1788.

Or. en

Amendment 638

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency; within the constraints set by integrated national energy and climate plans adopted under Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. Such consistency shall not imply uniform assumptions across sectors where different levels of maturity, regulatory development or infrastructure needs justify differentiated modelling approaches.

Or. en

Amendment 639

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency by identifying energy-efficient solutions that enable the most cost-effective decarbonisation pathways, optimise the use of renewable energy resources, non-wire and non-fossil flexibility solutions, and reduce system costs;

Or. en

Amendment 640

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency. This approach shall not imply uniform assumptions across sectors where different levels of maturity, regulatory development or infrastructure needs justify differentiated approaches;

Or. en

Amendment 641

Bruno Tobback, Yannis Maniatis, Nicolás González Casares, Elena Sancho Murillo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency giving priority to projects of common interest concerning electricity under the energy infrastructure category set out in point 1 of Annex II, subject to market uptake;

Or. en

Amendment 642

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency, and respecting constraints set by integrated national energy and climate plans adopted under Article 3 of Regulation (EU)2018/1999;

Or. en

Amendment 643

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency within the constraints set by integrated national energy and climate plans adopted under Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999;

Or. en

Amendment 644

Angelika Winzig

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas, heating and cooling, and CO₂ sectors, thereby optimizing system efficiency;

Or. en

Amendment 645

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take as much as possible a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, improving system efficiency;

Or. en

Amendment 646

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take as much as possible cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, improving system efficiency;

Or. en

Amendment 647

Seán Kelly

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency;(b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system and cost efficiency;

Or. en

Amendment 648

Jens Geier

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) reflect the development and needs of distribution networks by taking into account distribution-level constraints, demand and decentralised generation patterns, and flexibility needs, based on distribution network development plans and relevant data from distribution system operators;

Or. en

Justification

DSOs already carry out forward-looking planning based on local system needs, including demand growth, decentralised generation, and congestion management. These bottom-up assessments provide essential insights that are necessary to ensure that EU-level scenarios are technically robust and aligned with real system development.

Amendment 649

Andreas Glück, Bart Groothuis, Sophie Wilmès

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) reflect the needs of distribution networks by incorporating distribution network development plans and relevant data from distribution system operators;

Or. en

Amendment 650

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) include sensitivity analyses as appropriate.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 651

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) include sensitivity analyses as appropriate.deleted

Or. en

Justification

There is no need to include sensitivity analyses if several distinct, robust scenarios are developed.

Amendment 652

Tsvetelina Penkova, Bruno Gonçalves, Annalisa Corrado, Elena Sancho Murillo, Nicolás González Casares

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) include sensitivity analyses as appropriate.(c) include sensitivity analyses, such as explicitly accounting for the time dimension of energy flows, encompassing energy storage, and reflecting daily, multi-day, and seasonal variations in renewable energy generation and demand

Or. en

Justification

To ensure a comprehensive, forward-looking project assessment, sensitivity analyses should explicitly account for the time dimension of energy storage, including daily, multi-day and seasonal patterns of renewable generation and demand. This would support more robust system planning and improve the consistency and accuracy of cost-benefit analysis, especially as variable renewables increase.

Amendment 653

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) include sensitivity analyses as appropriate.(c) include sensitivity analyses as appropriate, such as divergence between trends required to achieve the objectives set in the central scenario and ongoing market trends, and limits to fossil gas availability.

Or. en

Justification

As evolving market trends or disruption in gas availability may radically change the assumptions behind the scenarios, and hence the infrastructure needs, where appropriate the Commission should take these trends into account adding sensitivity analyses.

Amendment 654

Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) include sensitivity analyses as appropriate.(c) include sensitivity analyses and several alternative scenarios.

Or. en

Justification

It is of interest to have alternatives to the scenario to have a better informed decision-making and to prepare for future developments that might create the need to reevaluate the central scenario.

Amendment 655

Bruno Tobback

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) include sensitivity analyses as appropriate.(c) include a maximum of two sensitivity analyses as appropriate.

Or. en

Amendment 656

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) include sensitivity analyses as appropriate.(c) include sensitivity analyses;

Or. en

Amendment 657

Tsvetelina Penkova, Bruno Tobback, Bruno Gonçalves, Giorgio Gori, Elena Sancho Murillo, Nicolás González Casares

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) take into account most recent distribution network development plans (DNDP) and bottom-up local specific capacity needs from DSO at TSO/DSO interconnection points.

Or. en

Amendment 658

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, András Gyürk, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) include alternative bottom-up scenarios to better represent energy system and infrastructure development pathways.

Or. en

Amendment 659

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) include alternative bottom-up scenarios to better represent energy system and infrastructure development pathways;

Or. en

Amendment 660

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) include alternative bottom-up scenarios to better represent energy system and infrastructure development pathways.

Or. en

Amendment 661

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) be fully consistent with the latest available European Resource Adequacy Assessment (ERAA);

Or. en

Justification

The European Resource Adequacy Assessment (ERAA) is an annual evaluation conducted by ENTSO-E to assess the risks to the EU's electricity supply over the next decade, ensuring there are sufficient resources to meet demand. It aims to identify potential adequacy concerns and inform necessary measures to secure electricity supply across Europe. The scenarios therefore should be fully consistent with the latest available ERAA.

Amendment 662

Nicolás González Casares, Bruno Tobback, Yannis Maniatis, Lina Gálvez, Elena Sancho Murillo, Tsvetelina Penkova

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) include the infraestructure projects defined as Energy Highways;

Or. en

Justification

The Central scenario should include the Energy Highways initiative; key bottlenecks across Europe which represent the most urgent energy infrastructure needs.

Amendment 663

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) be developed by relying on open-source software.

Or. en

Justification

Reliance on open source software and making data available under open data licence fosters transparency and stakeholder engagement. This enables stakeholders to provide accurate, independent modeling, offering additional evidence to support decision-makers

Amendment 664

Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) consider national and regional specificities.

Or. en

Justification

There should at least be a consideration of the national and regional specificities in the central scenario to make sure it is aligned with local realities and challenges.

Amendment 665

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c b) take into account the integrated national energy and climate plans adopted under Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and, where the later are outdated, additional data in line with the latest policies and technology cost development, collected by ENTSO for Electricity, ENTSO for Gas and ENNOH.

Or. en

Amendment 666

Anna Stürgkh, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis, Martin Hojsík

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c b) be developed at a spatially aggregated level onshore, aggregated either to Member States, bidding zones, control zones or NUTS1- or NUTS2-equivalent;

Or. en

Justification

To ensure transparency of the scenarios development, they should be published fully, with open data and model code, so stakeholders can understand the scenario development and results and easily make their own suggestions. To avoid security concerns, the granularity of the scenarios is explicitly specified at bidding zone level or similar as the data is already published at this level for the current TYNDP.

Amendment 667

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The two variations referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall include:
(a) an ‘NECP scenario’, which is based on the latest National Energy and Climate Plans drawn up by the Member States according to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and their updates;
(b) a ‘trends and projections scenario’, which considers the actual progress by Member States towards delivering the NECPs. It shall include observed evolution of supply and demand, on the basis of available evidence as well as on the basis of policies supported by concrete implementation measures.

Or. en

Amendment 668

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Christian Ehler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The Commission shall coordinate the development of the Union strategic scenario.

Or. en

Justification

The Commission should ensure overall coordination of the Union strategic scenario development process in order to guarantee consistency across sectors and alignment with Union energy and climate objectives.

Amendment 669

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 b. The initial scenario shall be developed by the Comission by (maximum 12 months after entry into force) and shall: (i) cover the planning horizon up to 2050 and include two successive ten-year planning periods within the overall planning horizon, the first one until 2040 and the next one until 2050; (ii) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective; (iii) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors and CO2 transport and storage, optimizing system efficiency and resilience, within the constraints set by integrated national energy and climate plans adopted under Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999; (iv) include sensitivity analyses and comparison to national alternatives; (vi) be used for the purposes of developing the infrastructure needs report pursuant to Article 12, the cost-benefit analysis pursuant to Article 14 and the cross-border allocation pursuant to Article 17.

Or. en

Justification

The initial scenario is necessary to ensure a coherent and forward-looking basis for Union-wide infrastructure planning. It should provide a consistent cross-sectoral basis for ENTSO-E, ENNOH, ENTSOG and other relevant entities to develop the infrastructure needs report referred to in Article 12, the cost-benefit analysis pursuant to Article 14 and the cross-border allocation pursuant to Article 17, while ensuring alignment with the Union’s climate neutrality objective, energy system integration and long-term resilience.

Amendment 670

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 c. The comprehensive scenario shall: (i) cover the planning horizon up to 2050 and include two successive ten-year planning periods within the overall planning horizon, the first one until 2040 and the next one until 2050; (ii) be based on a risk analysis considering, inter alias, extreme climatic and geostrategic risks, including cyber attacks and other similar risks; (iii) include the identification of infrastructure needs at Union level, including priority cross-border and strategically relevant internal grid needs and also unaddressed needs; (iv) include a Union-wide network map indicating the main corridors, bottlenecks, reinforcement needs and interdependencies between electricity, hydrogen and gas infrastructure and CO2 transport ans storage, as well as the expected final architecture of the Union’s cross-sectoral energy infrastructure network to be achieved under each planning horizon; (v) include indicative investment costs and financing needs for each planning window. The Commission may evaluate and propose appropriate financing mechanisms and support instruments facilitating the implementation of cost-benefit analyses referred to in this paragraph, taking into account Member States’ investment needs and the objective of an efficient and resilient Union energy system and enabling timely and efficient energy infrastructure investments across the Union; (vi) include the cost benefit analysis, including the expected benefits for system efficiency, resilience and security of supply; (vii) include implementation phases and milestones for delivery, with an indicative sequencing of measures and projects; (viii) take into account the integrated national energy and climate plans adopted under Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and, where the later are outdated, additional data in line with the latest policies and technology cost development, collected by ENTSO for Electricity, ENTSO for Gas and ENNOH.

Or. en

Justification

The comprehensive scenario is necessary to complement the initial scenario by bringing together the full set of elements required for long-term Union infrastructure planning across the electricity, hydrogen, gas and CO2 sectors. It should reflect the identification of strategic corridors, infrastructure bottlenecks, system interdependencies, resilience risks and investment needs, including through Union-wide mapping of major infrastructure and cross-border network developments. It would also improve consistency between infrastructure planning, investment priorities and the Union’s energy and climate objectives, while improving preparedness for cybersecurity, climate-related and geopolitical risks. In addition, it would support the effective implementation of the strategic scenario.

Amendment 671

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 672

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas), the EU-DSO entity and the Member States shall provide the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the Union strategic scenario referred to in paragraph 1. The national data and technical inputs of each Member State may be prepared and submitted through its national infrastructure coordination groups. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data, provided that the relevant data is not confidential. Before issuing a request, the Commission shall consult with ENTSO for Electricity, ENTSO for Gas and ENNOH on guidelines and templates used for data collection. The Commission shall adopt guidelines and templates to ensure that the requested data are compatible with models used for developing the scenarios. In its requests or decisions, the Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, and request regular updates, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The addressee shall provide information that may be obtained by reasonable effort. Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.

Or. en

Justification

Commission should consult relevant stakeholders before finalising methodologies and data collection templates in order to ensure transparency, consistency and the practical data use. This would facilitate cooperation with national experts and system operators, improve the completeness and comparability of submitted data and reduce the risk of inconsistent or incomplete responses linked to technical, confidentiality or administrative constraints. Such coordination is particularly important for the development of the Union strategic scenario, given its cross-sectoral scope and its role in supporting both the initial and comprehensive scenarios.

Amendment 673

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide the draft central scenario to the Commission for approval, including the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.

Or. en

Amendment 674

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall submit the draft central scenario to the Commission for approval, including the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission may request the Agency to verify all the data, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.

Or. en

Amendment 675

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall submit the draft central scenario to the Commission for approval, including the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission may request the Agency to verify all the data, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.

Or. en

Amendment 676

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information used in the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required.

Or. en

Amendment 677

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. ENTSO-E and ENTSOG, shall, in cooperation with ENNOH, submit for approval the consolidated input data for building the scenario to the TEN-E regional group decision-making body in particular to validate the consolidation of the data from national energy and climate plans adopted under Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) shall provide, upon request from the Commission or Member States, the data and information used for the development of referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Agency may, upon a reasoned request from the Commission, verify the methodological consistency of the data submitted, without interfering with Member States' competences regarding their energy mix and national planning choices, underlying policy assumptions or national energy strategies. Data requests shall be proportionate and limited to information strictly necessary for Union-level modelling and shall avoid duplication with existing reporting obligations under Union law.

Or. en

Amendment 678

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the scenarios referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities. Data requests shall be proportionate and limited to information strictly necessary for Union-level modelling and shall avoid duplication with existing reporting obligations under Union law.

Or. en

Amendment 679

Andreas Glück, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas), the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the scenarios referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.

Or. en

Amendment 680

Anna Stürgkh, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis, Martin Hojsík

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide to the Commission and the Agency, upon request from the Commission or the Agency, the data and information necessary for the development of the scenarios referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The the Agency shall verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities. The Agency shall inform the Commission about the results of the data verification.

Or. en

Justification

Introducing mandatory data verification by ACER to ensure that the scenario development is based on validated data and to enhance regulatory oversight.

Amendment 681

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide to the Planner, the Commission, the Agency, and the Stakeholder Reference Group, upon request from the Planner, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Agency shall verify the data submitted, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities, and shall inform the Planner and the Commission.

Or. en

Amendment 682

Bruno Tobback, Yannis Maniatis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario and the sensitivity analyses referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.

Or. en

Amendment 683

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission or the Agency, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario and sensitivities referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Agency shall verify the data prior submission to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.

Or. en

Justification

ACER should be mandated to validate all data before it is submitted to the Commission to ensure regulatory oversight and that the Commission's work is based on validated data.

Amendment 684

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the Agency to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.3. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas) and the Member States shall provide, upon request from the Commission, the data and information necessary for the development of the central scenario referred to in paragraph 1. That includes, but is not limited to market and network data, such as demand and supply projections, characteristics of power generation, hydrogen production and networks, flexibility sources, imports assumptions, as well as climatic years data. The Commission shall set a reasonable time limit within which the data and information is to be provided, taking into account the complexity and urgency of the data and information required. Where an addressee does not provide the information requested within the time limit set by the Commission or supplies incomplete information, the Commission may by decision require the information to be provided. The Commission may request the TEN-E Group to verify the data submitted to the Commission, including by verifying national data with the relevant national regulatory authorities.

Or. en

Amendment 685

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. All input data used in the scenarios as well as all output data shall be published aggregated with an open data licence, at a sufficient granularity to allow independent third parties to replicate the scenario development and develop alternative scenarios.

Or. en

Justification

Reliance on open source software and making data available under open data licence fosters transparency and stakeholder engagement. This enables stakeholders to provide accurate, independent modeling, offering additional evidence to support decision-makers

Amendment 686

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Borys Budka, Mirosława Nykiel

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 687

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 688

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders, including TSOs, DSOs and other electricity operators, charging point operators, e-mobility service providers, network users, consumers, academia and civil society, on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario, including by foreseeing a process allowing stakeholders to provide input to the scenarios by submitting alternative scenarios, provided that they are documented to a sufficient level. Following the consultation, the Commission shall publish a report explaining how the comments received have been taken into account.

Or. en

Justification

Thorough stakeholder engagement and reliance on best practices for stakeholder consultation is key to improve the planning process and ensure its public acceptance

Amendment 689

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.4. The Union strategic scenario shall be developed by the Commission, as provided for in Article 11(1) and 11(2), coordinating and in cooperation with the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity) and the Member States. All the relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the Union strategic scenario development process, including assumptions and their use, shall be consulted if necessary. The Commission and the Member States may consult large electricity users, who may provide confidential, non-binding, location-specific estimates of their expected energy demand needs, including projections extending up to 10 years.

Or. en

Justification

This amendment strengthens the governance and coordination of the Union strategic scenario development process by ensuring structured cooperation between the Commission, Member States, regulatory authorities and relevant energy sector actors. It also introduces the possibility to consult large electricity users in order to improve the accuracy of long-term electricity demand projections, particularly in view of industrial electrification, strategic investments and emerging energy-intensive projects. This would support more reliable infrastructure planning, earlier identification of future network needs and better alignment between energy infrastructure development and industrial policy objectives.

Amendment 690

Angelika Winzig

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders including organisations representing undertakings, in particular final consumers, active in the electricity, natural gas, hydrogen, heating and cooling, carbon capture and storage, and carbon capture and utilisation sectors on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.

Or. en

Amendment 691

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the draft central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.

Or. en

Amendment 692

Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States, the TEN-E Group as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.

Or. en

Amendment 693

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the draft central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.

Or. en

Amendment 694

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.

Or. en

Justification

Alignment with changes to Article 11 Paragraph 1

Amendment 695

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.4. The Planner shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States, the Commission, the Stakeholder Reference Group, as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data and assumptions used for the purpose of the central scenarios development process.

Or. en

Amendment 696

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the central scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the central scenario.4. The Commission shall consult the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the European entity for the cooperation of electricity distribution system operators in the European Union (EU DSO Entity), the Member States as well as other relevant stakeholders on the data collected for the purpose of the scenario development process, including assumptions and their use in the development of the scenarios.

Or. en

Amendment 697

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The ESABCC may, on its own initiative, submit an opinion on the consistency of the draft central scenarios and its underlying assumptions with the Union's energy and climate targets and with the climate-neutrality objective set out in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119. Where available, that opinion shall be made publicly available together with the draft central scenarios. When the central scenarios are adopted, a statement shall be published setting out how that opinion has been taken into account or, where appropriate, the reasons for not following it.

Or. en

Amendment 698

Bruno Tobback

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. All input data used in the scenario and sensitivities as well as all output data shall be published aggregated to the level of Member States, bidding zones or control zones with an open data licence, in line with Directive (EU) 2019/1024 on open data and the re-use of public sector information. The data shall be sufficiently documented and formatted to allow for third-party replication of the scenario development. The input data shall include at least generation potentials and capacities, storage capacities, cross-border capacities, time series for demand and renewable generation at at least hourly resolution for multiple weather years, technology assumptions (efficiencies, costs), maintenance and outage schedules, sector-coupling assumptions, currency year used, social discount rate and data on non-EU countries included in the analyses.

Or. en

Amendment 699

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis, Martin Hojsík

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. In the consultation process referred to in paragraph 4, the Commission shall take into account any alternative scenarios developed by third parties, provided that they are documented to a sufficient level. The Commission shall publish a consultation report summarising the contributions and potential alternative scenarios received and explaining how they were taken into account or, where relevant, why they were not.

Or. en

Amendment 700

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The TEN-E Group and Stakeholder Reference Group shall receive updates by the Planner during the central scenarios development on how their comments are being taken into consideration.

Or. en

Amendment 701

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 b. All input data used in the scenarios as well as all output data shall be published aggregated to the level of member states, bidding zones, control zones or NUTS1/2-equivalent with an open data licence, conforming with Directive (EU) 2019/1024 on open data and the re-use of public sector information.
The data shall be sufficiently documented and versioned that any third party can replicate the scenario development. All model source code and libraries used to develop the scenarios shall be published with an open software licence. A first version of the data and code shall be published at least six months before the scenarios are finalised, in order to give third parties time to review the data and calculate alternative scenarios.
The input data shall include generation potentials and capacities, storage capacities, cross-border capacities, time series for demand and renewable generation at least hourly resolution for multiple weather years, technology assumptions (efficiencies, costs), maintenance and outage schedules, sector-coupling assumptions, currency year used, social discount rate and data on third countries included in the analysis.

Or. en

Amendment 702

Anna Stürgkh, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis, Martin Hojsík

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 b. All input data used in the scenarios as well as all output data shall be published aggregated to the level of Member States, bidding zones, control zones or NUTS1/2-equivalent with an open data licence, conforming with Directive (EU) 2019/1024 on open data and the re-use of public sector information. The data shall be sufficiently documented and versioned to enable any third party to replicate the scenario development. All model source code and libraries used to develop the scenarios shall be published using an open software licence. A first version of the data and code shall be published at least 6 months before the scenarios are finalised. The input data shall include generation potentials and capacities, storage capacities, cross-border capacities, time series for demand and renewable generation at at least hourly resolution for multiple weather years, technology assumptions (efficiencies, costs), maintenance and outage schedules, sector-coupling assumptions, currency year used, social discount rate and data on non-EU countries included in the analysis.

Or. en

Justification

An open model would allow stakeholders, including national regulators, ACER, member states, academics and civil society to make suggestions to adapt the scenarios, find improvements and test innovative technologies (e.g. non-wire Grid Enhancing Technologies, more flexibility, different market designs).

Amendment 703

Bruno Tobback

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 b. In developing the sensitivity analyses, where applicable, the Commission shall take into consideration any alternative analyses developed by third parties, provided that they are documented to a sufficient level. The Commission shall document how the alternative analyses were taken into account in the development of their sensitivity analyses.

Or. en

Amendment 704

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 c. In the stakeholder consultation process, the Planner shall look at any alternative scenarios developed by third parties, provided that they are documented to a sufficient level and are submitted within reasonable time before the scenario finalisation.

Or. en

Amendment 705

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4 d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 d. The Planner shall submit the draft central scenarios to the Commission, together with an explanation of how the alternative scenarios developed by third parties were taken into account in the reference scenario or in the two variations referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, or for what reasons they were not taken into account.

Or. en

Amendment 706

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 707

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 708

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.5. ENTSO-E and ENTSOG shall, in cooperation with ENNOH, submit for approval the draft scenarios to the TEN-E decision-making body.

Or. en

Amendment 709

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenarios to the TEN-E Group and the Stakeholder Reference Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members and the Stakeholder Reference Group shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenarios.

Or. en

Amendment 710

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.5. The Commission shall submit the draft main scenario, the additional scenarios and sensitivities, to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within two month of receiving the draft scenarios and sensitivities.

Or. en

Justification

Alignment with changes to Article 11 Paragraph 1

Amendment 711

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.5. ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within two months of receiving the draft central scenario.

Or. en

Amendment 712

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario and, if appropriate, the sensitivities to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.

Or. en

Amendment 713

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.5. ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and ENNOH shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within two month of receiving the draft central scenario.

Or. en

Justification

For consistency wit am. to par.1

Amendment 714

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.5. The Commission shall submit the draft Union strategic scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft Union strategic scenario.

Or. en

Amendment 715

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Commission shall submit the draft central scenario to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft central scenario.5. ENTSO-E, ENTSO-G and ENNOH shall submit the draft scenarios to the TEN-E Group, together with information on how the comments received in the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 have been taken into consideration. The TEN-E Group members shall deliver their comments, if any, within one month of receiving the draft scenarios.

Or. en

Amendment 716

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the central scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the central scenario taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 717

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Borys Budka, Mirosława Nykiel

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the central scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the central scenario taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 718

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the central scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the central scenario taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group.6. The Commission shall adopt scenarios only following the explicit approval of the Member States, national regulatory authorities and transmission system operators represented in the TEN-E Group, and shall duly take into account their comments. Where justified comments or proposed amendments are submitted by the Member States, national regulatory authorities or transmission system operators, the Commission shall revise the draft scenarios accordingly.

Or. en

Amendment 719

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the central scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the central scenario taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group.6. The Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt a Decision approving the Union strategic scenario.

Or. en

Justification

This amendment ensures stronger Member State involvement in the adoption of the Union strategic scenario, given its direct impact on infrastructure planning, investment decisions and national energy policy choices. Considering the strategic and cross-border implications of these scenarios, a Council decision would provide greater political ownership, transparency and institutional balance, while supporting broader acceptance and smoother implementation across Member States.

Amendment 720

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the central scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the central scenario taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group.6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the main scenario and the additional scenarios and sensitivity analyses taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group.

Or. en

Justification

Alignment with changes to Article 11 Paragraph 1

Amendment 721

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the central scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the central scenario taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group.6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the central scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the central scenario taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group and of the Stakeholder Reference Group.

Or. en

Amendment 722

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the central scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the central scenario taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group.6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 to supplement this Regulation by establishing the scenarios pursuant to this Article. The Commission shall adopt the central scenario taking into account the comments from the TEN-E Group.

Or. en

Amendment 723

Bruno Tobback

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the finalised input and output data for the central scenario and sensitivity analyses, where applicable, listed in paragraph 4a, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 724

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Justification

For consistency with amendments to par. 1

Amendment 725

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenarios the Planner shall publish the final input and output data for the central scenarios listed in paragtraph 4b of this Article, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 726

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, András Gyürk, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the draft central scenario the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 727

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the central scenario the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 728

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the central scenario the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 729

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the decision made by the TEN-E decision making body approving the scenarios ENTSO-E and ENTSOG shall publish the underlying input and output data for the scenarios, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 730

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the central scenario ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 731

Anna Stürgkh, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6, the Commission shall publish the underlying finalised input and output data, including the data referred to in [Paragraph 4b - input data] for the scenarios and sensitivities.

Or. en

Amendment 732

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the publication of the decision made by TEN-E Group approving the scenarios, ENTSOs shall publish the underlying input and output data for the scenarios, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 733

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Following the publication of the delegated act on the central scenario the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the central scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.7. Following the decision approving the Union strategic scenario, the Commission shall publish the underlying input and output data for the Union strategic scenario, subject to restrictions under national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.

Or. en

Justification

This amendment ensures consistency with Article 11 para 6, which provides that the Union strategic scenario is approved by a Council decision on the basis of a Commission proposal.

Amendment 734

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 735

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, shall maintain and, where necessary, update the scenarios and sensitivity analyses if this is necessary based on market or policy developments developments or where significant policy, market or system developments so require. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.
Where updated scenarios or sensitivity analyses indicate materially different infrastructure needs, the Commission shall, after having consulted the Agency, assess whether an updated infrastructure needs identification pursuant to Article 12 is required.

Or. en

Amendment 736

Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. At least every 24 months following the adoption of the central scenario, the Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, shall assess whether additional sensitivities or updates to the central scenario are necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament and the TEN-E Group on the results of this assessment and based on that assessment amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses or updates to the central scenario.

Or. en

Justification

It is necessary to frequently update the central scenario to take into account developments and thereby it must be mandatory for the Commission to make an assessment of the need to add sensitivities or update the central scenario and to inform the TEN-E Group of the results of that assessment and to adapt the scenario accordingly.

Amendment 737

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, including TSOs, DSOs and other electricity operators, charging point operators, e-mobility service providers, network users, consumers, academia and civil society, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.

Or. en

Justification

Thorough stakeholder engagement is key to improve the planning process and ensure its public acceptance

Amendment 738

Christophe Grudler, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The Commission in cooperation with the ENTSOs, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, shall develop sensitivity analyses to the scenarios. The sensitivity analysis shall assess the impact of the most relevant socio-economic parameters, including demand evolution, renewable deployment pace, fuel and CO2 prices, and electrification rates. The Commission shall amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include sensitivity analyses.

Or. en

Amendment 739

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH, under supervision of the Commission guaranteeing in particular the technology neutrality principle, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.

Or. en

Amendment 740

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas anf the ENNOH, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses, including alternative bottom- up scenarios, to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses, including such alternative bottom-up scenarios.

Or. en

Amendment 741

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, András Gyürk, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses, including alternative bottom-up scenarios, to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses, including such alternative bottom-up scenarious.

Or. en

Amendment 742

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The Commission, in close cooperation with the Agency, national regulatory authorities, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, the ENTSO for Gas, the EU DSO Entity and the Member States shall develop sensitivity analyses to the EU strategic scenario based on the market or policy developments. Where such sensitivity analyses materially affect infrastructure needs, costs, sequencing or network mapping, the relevant implementation phases shall be accordingly updated. The Commission shall lead and coordinate that process.

Or. en

Justification

This amendment strengthens the governance and coordination of sensitivity analyses by ensuring the structured involvement of all relevant system, regulatory and technical actors, while clarifying the Commission’s coordinating role. It also ensures that material changes resulting from such analyses are consistently reflected in infrastructure planning and implementation phases, thereby improving coherence, predictability and cross-border coordination across the Union.

Amendment 743

Tomas Tobé, François-Xavier Bellamy, Jörgen Warborn, Aura Salla, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. ENTSO-E and ENTSOG, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, the Commission and relevant stakeholders, shall develop sensitivity analyses to the scenarios if this is necessary based on market or policy developments.

Or. en

Amendment 744

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. ENTSO-E and ENTSO-G, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, the Commission, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, shall develop sensitivity analyses to the scenarios if this is necessary based on market or policy developments.

Or. en

Amendment 745

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may refere to ENTSO-E, ENTSOG and ENNOH to update the central scenario or to develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.

Or. en

Amendment 746

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may ask to ENTSO-E, ENTSOG and ENNOH to update the central scenario or to develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.

Or. en

Amendment 747

Bruno Tobback

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop a maximum of two sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.

Or. en

Amendment 748

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission, taking into account the views of the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenario if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.8. The Planner, taking into account the views of the Commission, the Agency, the Member States, national regulatory authorities, and relevant stakeholders, may develop sensitivity analyses to the central scenarios if this is necessary based on market or policy developments. The Commission may amend the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article in order to include any such sensitivity analyses.

Or. en

Amendment 749

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 11a
Scenarios for the ten-year network development plans
1. In order to facilitate the preparation of the Union-wide ten-year network development plans, the infrastructure needs identification process, the energy system-wide cost-benefit analysis and the cross-border cost allocation, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall develop, in cooperation with the Member States, the national regulatory authorities and the relevant network operators, a number of scenarios for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors. These scenarios shall take into account the integrated national energy and climate plans, the national network development plans, security of supply, costs for consumers and Member States' right to determine their energy mix, in accordance with Article 194(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
2. The scenarios referred to in paragraph 1 shall be submitted to the decision-making body of the TEN-E Group for approval by the Member States before being used for the purposes of this Regulation. The Commission may facilitate coordination and put forward non-binding comments, but it may not itself develop a single central scenario, impose a scenario on the Member States, or take over their role in assessing their energy choices, their national infrastructure needs or their security of supply.
(Replaces Article 11)

Or. fr

Amendment 750

Aleksandar Nikolic, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Christophe Bay, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Infrastructure needs identification reportdeleted

Or. fr

Amendment 751

Christophe Grudler, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Infrastructure needs identification reportInfrastructure needs and system opportunities identification report

Or. en

Amendment 752

Yannis Maniatis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps. For the purposes of system integration, the ENTSO for Gas shall develop a system assessment report, which assesses impacts on affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity, and hydrogen, gas and other renewable and low-carbon gases. The system assessment report shall be taken into account by the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH for Infrastructure Needs Identification.

Or. en

Amendment 753

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps. For the purposes of system integration, the ENTSO for Gas shall develop a system assessment report, which assesses impacts on affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity, and hydrogen, gas and other renewable and low-carbon gases. The system assessment report shall be taken into account by the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH for Infrastructure Needs Identification.

Or. en

Justification

Within the TEN-E proposal, repurposing is explicitly defined and specified in the hydrogen infrastructure category. However, there is a notable absence of considering the impact of repurposing and other gas system evolutions on the whole energy system. It is essential that security of supply needs be taken into account.This absence of a complete view of the whole energy system and its security of supply could potentially result in removing or not investing in essential infrastructure. For proper planning, meeting infrastructure development standards, and to address adequacy needs, the TEN-E Regulation should include a proper gas infrastructure assessment and monitoring at a full energy system level, not just at project levels. The conclusions of the 10th Energy Infrastructure Forum in Copenhagen (CEIF) in June 2024, required ENNOH and ENTSOG to develop a report on criteria for repurposing natural gas infrastructure for hydrogen, which was finalised in November 2025 as requested by the 11th CEIF in June 2025. The described process represents just one possibility to be considered by relevant competent authorities within the Member States for the needed flexibility during the planning process. The findings of this report will be taken into account in the Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2026, as requested by the Forum.

Amendment 754

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. For the purpose of identification infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity, hydrogen, natural gas and other renewable and low-carbon gases the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report. The ENTSO for Gas shall develop a system assessment report. The preparation of these reports shall take place in close cooperation.

Or. en

Justification

There is an existing ENTSOG system assessment report which looks into supply, demand and stress situations and if infrastructure is ready to deal with different situations. It serves a similar purpose compared to the Infrastructure Needs Report from ENTSO-E and ENNOH. To have an integrated overview of the energy system, the findings of the ENTSOG system assessment report should feed into the Infrastructure Needs Report from ENTSO-E and ENNOH.

Amendment 755

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall identify unmatched infrastructure needs affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen respectively, and the ENTSO for gas shall identify redundant infrastructure not needed to meet the Union’s gas needs for which it recommends repurposing or decommissioning, in order to jointly develop an infrastructure needs identification report.

Or. en

Justification

Achieving EU's energy and climate requires phasing out gas and gas infrastructure. To ensure that the process is cost effective, the ENTSO for Gas should be required to identify what infrastructure will become redundant because of lowering gas demand, what infrastructure can cost effectively be repurposed to transport hydrogen and what infrastructure instead needs to be decommissioned

Amendment 756

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity, hydrogen, natural, renewable and low-carbon gases. Once approved, the infrastructure needs report shall be incorporated into the Union strategic scenario.

Or. en

Justification

Infrastructure needs report should be based on proper identification of the challenges based on in depth assessment done by all relevant entities for electricity, gas and hydrogen. Infrastructure needs report should rely not just on high-level projections, but on a thorough, technically grounded evaluation of the actual energy system and of its function as a whole. Using a robust system assessment, infrastructure deployment can better support low- and zero-emission energy integration, enhancing environmental and climate outcomes.

Amendment 757

Christophe Grudler, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify system opportunities for the achievement of the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen. The identification of system opportunities report shall not include the identification of solutions to address potential system needs.

Or. en

Amendment 758

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report system needs affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen. The Infrastructure needs identification report shall not include the identification of solutions to address system needs.

Or. en

Justification

The infrastructure needs identification report should define realistic expectations. It identifies cross‑border transmission needs, understood as the capacity to transfer energy between countries based on economic criteria. It is a high‑level analysis aimed at identifying grid improvement opportunities, which require further assessment through national or regional studies. The report does not identify solutions, as this requires different methodologies, detailed technical and environmental assessments and political discussions at national or regional level.

Amendment 759

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. The Planner, in cooperation with the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify unmatched infrastructure needs affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.

Or. en

Amendment 760

Angelika Winzig

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.

Or. en

Amendment 761

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Morten Løkkegaard, Barry Andrews, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify infrastructure gaps affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.1. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, shall develop an infrastructure needs identification report to identify unmatched infrastructure needs affecting the Union’s objectives related to electricity and hydrogen.

Or. en

Justification

Replacing “infrastructure gaps” with “unmatched needs” since the concept of infrastructure gaps is not used anywhere else in this or other articles.

Amendment 762

Christophe Grudler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. The report referred to in the paragraph 1 shall rely upon a methodology, prepared by the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively, which shall be submitted to the Agency for an opinion. The Agency shall provide such opinion within six months of receipt of the proposal for the methodology. The methodology shall foresee technical network modelling, including internal reinforcements needed to support cross-border developments.

Or. en

Amendment 763

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The infrastructure needs identification reports shall:2. The infrastructure needs identification and system assessment reports shall, notably:

Or. en

Justification

Within the TEN-E proposal, repurposing is explicitly defined and specified in the hydrogen infrastructure category. However, there is a notable absence of considering the impact of repurposing and other gas system evolutions on the whole energy system. It is essential that security of supply needs be taken into account.This absence of a complete view of the whole energy system and its security of supply could potentially result in removing or not investing in essential infrastructure. For proper planning, meeting infrastructure development standards, and to address adequacy needs, the TEN-E Regulation should include a proper gas infrastructure assessment and monitoring at a full energy system level, not just at project levels. The conclusions of the 10th Energy Infrastructure Forum in Copenhagen (CEIF) in June 2024, required ENNOH and ENTSOG to develop a report on criteria for repurposing natural gas infrastructure for hydrogen, which was finalised in November 2025 as requested by the 11th CEIF in June 2025. The described process represents just one possibility to be considered by relevant competent authorities within the Member States for the needed flexibility during the planning process. The findings of this report will be taken into account in the Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2026, as requested by the Forum.

Amendment 764

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The infrastructure needs identification reports shall:2. The infrastructure needs identification and system assessment reports shall:

Or. en

Amendment 765

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The infrastructure needs identification reports shall:2. These infrastructure needs identification reports shall:

Or. en

Amendment 766

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the initial scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses, taking into account the long-term planning horizon, the two ten-year planning periods, the network mapping, the estimated investment cost and the phased implementation milestones, taking into consideration the system stability and security of supply in the Member States;

Or. en

Justification

This amendment ensures that the infrastructure needs report is based on a sufficiently detailed and operationally relevant scenario. It also strengthens the integration of security of supply and system stability considerations into Union infrastructure planning

Amendment 767

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the ENTSO for Electricity, ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses, as well as on additional scenarios and sensitivities developed by ENTSO for Electricity or ENNOH, respectively;

Or. en

Justification

If the infrastructure needs identification report supports the needs-matching process foreseen in Art 13, then it is important to foresee the possibility that its analysis is based on as many scenarios as possible. Therefore Art 12 and Annex VII 1) should be amended to open the possibility that the infrastructure needs identification report may rely on additional scenarios to the EC central scenarios and its sensitivities, including the scenarios sensitivities to be developed by ENTSO-E, ENTSOG and ENNOH according to proposed new Art 11(9) above.

Amendment 768

Andreas Glück, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the most recent scenarios and sensitivities developed by the Commission in close consultation with the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, the ENNOH, the EU DSO Entity, the Member States and the Agency in accordance with Article 11;

Or. en

Amendment 769

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the reference scenario developed by the Planner in accordance with Article 11 and, where available, its sensitivity analyses;

Or. en

Amendment 770

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, András Gyürk, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the scenarios developed by the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH in accordance with Article 11;

Or. en

Amendment 771

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the central scenario approved by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;

Or. en

Amendment 772

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Sigrid Friis, Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the most recent scenarios and sensitivities developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11;

Or. en

Justification

Alignment with changes to Article 11 Paragraph 1

Amendment 773

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the central scenario in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;

Or. en

Amendment 774

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the central scenario in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;

Or. en

Amendment 775

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be based on the central scenario developed by the Commission in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;(a) be based on the scenarios developed in accordance with Article 11 and its sensitivity analyses;

Or. en

Amendment 776

Seán Kelly

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) identify infrastructure needs through a cost-effective assessment of system needs, prioritising solutions that minimise overall system costs;

Or. en

Amendment 777

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) be based on input data from the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively;

Or. en

Amendment 778

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) comply with the methodology developed by the Agency pursuant to paragraph 11;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 779

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) comply with the methodology developed by the Agency pursuant to paragraph 11;(b) comply with the sector methodologies developed by the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH pursuant to paragraph 11;

Or. en

Justification

For the sake of clarity with amendment provided on Art 12(11) concerning the changes in the methodology drafting process. Responsibilities should be shared, with ENTSO‑E and ENNOH drafting the methodology, ACER issuing an opinion, and the Commission approving it, in line with the CBA methodology process.

Amendment 780

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) comply with the methodology developed by the Agency pursuant to paragraph 11;(b) comply with the methodologies developed by ENTSO-E and ENNOH and approved by Agency pursuant to paragraph 11;

Or. en

Amendment 781

Christophe Grudler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) comply with the methodology developed by the Agency pursuant to paragraph 11;(b) comply with the methodology developed by the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH pursuant to paragraph 11;

Or. en

Amendment 782

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) comply with the methodology developed by the Agency pursuant to paragraph 11;(b) comply with the framework guidelines developed by the Agency pursuant to paragraph 11;

Or. en

Amendment 783

Anna Stürgkh, Emma Wiesner, Christophe Grudler, Katri Kulmuni, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors.(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach and systemic consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors, by explicitly taking into account interactions, trade-offs and synergies between these sectors within the infrastructure needs identification.

Or. en

Amendment 784

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors.(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors as well as, where applicable, district heating and CO2 sectors, including impacts of different climatic zones, seasonality and local and national circumstances.

Or. en

Justification

It allows infrastructure needs assessments to better take into account regional and climatic conditions, seasonality and national specificities, which is important to avoid unrealistic planning assumptions and to support more resilient, flexible and cost-efficient decarbonisation pathways across the Union.

Amendment 785

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors.(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, the district heating and CO2 sectors and gas decommissioning.

Or. en

Amendment 786

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors.(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, natural gas and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, district heating and CO2 sectors.

Or. en

Amendment 787

Yannis Maniatis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors.(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors as well as, where applicable, district heating and CO2 sectors.

Or. en

Amendment 788

Angelika Winzig

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors.(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, gas and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, district heating and CO2 sectors.

Or. en

Amendment 789

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors.(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors as well as, where applicable, district heating and CO2 sectors.

Or. en

Justification

Within the TEN-E proposal, repurposing is explicitly defined and specified in the hydrogen infrastructure category. However, there is a notable absence of considering the impact of repurposing and other gas system evolutions on the whole energy system. It is essential that security of supply needs be taken into account.This absence of a complete view of the whole energy system and its security of supply could potentially result in removing or not investing in essential infrastructure. For proper planning, meeting infrastructure development standards, and to address adequacy needs, the TEN-E Regulation should include a proper gas infrastructure assessment and monitoring at a full energy system level, not just at project levels. The conclusions of the 10th Energy Infrastructure Forum in Copenhagen (CEIF) in June 2024, required ENNOH and ENTSOG to develop a report on criteria for repurposing natural gas infrastructure for hydrogen, which was finalised in November 2025 as requested by the 11th CEIF in June 2025. The described process represents just one possibility to be considered by relevant competent authorities within the Member States for the needed flexibility during the planning process. The findings of this report will be taken into account in the Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2026, as requested by the Forum.

Amendment 790

Seán Kelly

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity and hydrogen sectors as well as, where applicable, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors.(d) ensure a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity sector and, where applicable, hydrogen, gas, district heating and CO2 sectors.

Or. en

Amendment 791

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) In the case of the system assessment report, assess the impact of repurposing gas infrastructure to hydrogen and other renewable and low-carbon gases or other required infrastructure developments especially concerning security of supply and the whole energy system stability. This assessment shall consider the relevant repurposing criteria.

Or. en

Justification

Within the TEN-E proposal, repurposing is explicitly defined and specified in the hydrogen infrastructure category. However, there is a notable absence of considering the impact of repurposing and other gas system evolutions on the whole energy system. It is essential that security of supply needs be taken into account.This absence of a complete view of the whole energy system and its security of supply could potentially result in removing or not investing in essential infrastructure. For proper planning, meeting infrastructure development standards, and to address adequacy needs, the TEN-E Regulation should include a proper gas infrastructure assessment and monitoring at a full energy system level, not just at project levels. The conclusions of the 10th Energy Infrastructure Forum in Copenhagen (CEIF) in June 2024, required ENNOH and ENTSOG to develop a report on criteria for repurposing natural gas infrastructure for hydrogen, which was finalised in November 2025 as requested by the 11th CEIF in June 2025. The described process represents just one possibility to be considered by relevant competent authorities within the Member States for the needed flexibility during the planning process. The findings of this report will be taken into account in the Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2026, as requested by the Forum.

Amendment 792

Yannis Maniatis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) In the case of the system assessment report, assess the impact of repurposing gas infrastructure to hydrogen and other renewable and low-carbon gases or other required infrastructure developments especially concerning security of supply and the whole energy system stability. This assessment shall consider the relevant repurposing criteria.

Or. en

Amendment 793

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
In addition, the system assessment report, in line with Annex VIII, shall assess the impact of repurposing gas infrastructure to hydrogen and other renewable and low-carbon gases or other required infrastructure developments especially concerning security of supply and the whole energy system stability.

Or. en

Amendment 794

Sigrid Friis, Martin Hojsík, Barry Andrews, Yvan Verougstraete

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) ensure forward-looking climate and extreme weather risk scenarios, including the potential of non-wire and digital solutions to prevent system failures, and reflect decarbonisation needs.

Or. en

Amendment 795

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) take account of the capabilities of all available and emerging grid enhancing technologies

Or. en

Justification

The infrastructure needs report should adequately reflect the contribution of grid-enhancing technologies and emerging solutions, which can improve network efficiency, optimise the use of existing infrastructure and reduce unnecessary investment costs.

Amendment 796

Seán Kelly

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) take into account the capabilities of available and emerging grid enhancing technologies;

Or. en

Amendment 797

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d b) consider forward-looking climate and extreme weather risk scenarios, including the potential of non-wire and digital solutions to prevent system failures

Or. en

Justification

The infrastructure needs report should better integrate forward-looking climate and extreme weather risks in order to support more resilient infrastructure planning and improve preparedness against increasing system disruptions. The amendment also recognises the role of non-wire and digital solutions in enhancing system reliability and flexibility.

Amendment 798

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d c) be consistent with Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, including the integrated National Energy and Climate Plans submitted pursuant Article 3 thereof

Or. en

Justification

Consistency between the infrastructure needs report and the integrated National Energy and Climate Plans is necessary to ensure coherence between Union-level infrastructure planning and Member States’ energy and climate priorities, while improving predictability for infrastructure development and investment planning.

Amendment 799

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.3. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH and the ENTSO for gas, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders including the EU DSO Entity, TSOs, DSOs and other electricity operators, charging point operators, e-mobility service providers, network users, consumers, academia and civil society, on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report. Following the consultation, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for gas and the ENNOH shall publish a report outlining how the comments received have been taken into account.

Or. en

Justification

Thorough stakeholder engagement and reliance on best practices for stakeholder consultation is key to improve the planning process and ensure its public acceptance

Amendment 800

Anna Stürgkh, Emma Wiesner, Morten Løkkegaard, Barry Andrews, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.3. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH, respectively, shall ensure a transparent and structured consultation of all stakeholders on data, assumptions, modelling approaches, beyond the scenarios’ data and assumptions, modelling approaches already consulted by the Commission pursuant to Article 11, and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report. All assumptions, data sources, modelling approaches, parameters and assessment criteria shall be made publicly available in an appropriate manner.

Or. en

Justification

Improving transparency.

Amendment 801

Angelika Winzig

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.3. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders, especially those representing final energy consumers, on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.

Or. en

Amendment 802

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.3. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH and the ENTSO for Gas, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional scenarios, data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification and system assessment reports.

Or. en

Justification

Added a reference to additional scenarios, for consistency with the proposal on Art 12(2) (a).Within the TEN-E proposal, repurposing is explicitly defined and specified in the hydrogen infrastructure category. However, there is a notable absence of considering the impact of repurposing and other gas system evolutions on the whole energy system. It is essential that security of supply needs be taken into account.This absence of a complete view of the whole energy system and its security of supply could potentially result in removing or not investing in essential infrastructure. For proper planning, meeting infrastructure development standards, and to address adequacy needs, the TEN-E Regulation should include a proper gas infrastructure assessment and monitoring at a full energy system level, not just at project levels. The conclusions of the 10th Energy Infrastructure Forum in Copenhagen (CEIF) in June 2024, required ENNOH and ENTSOG to develop a report on criteria for repurposing natural gas infrastructure for hydrogen, which was finalised in November 2025 as requested by the 11th CEIF in June 2025. The described process represents just one possibility to be considered by relevant competent authorities within the Member States for the needed flexibility during the planning process. The findings of this report will be taken into account in the Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2026, as requested by the Forum.

Amendment 803

Ondřej Krutílek, Daniel Obajtek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.3. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs and system assessment identification reports.

Or. en

Amendment 804

Yannis Maniatis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.3. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH and the ENTSO for Gas, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.

Or. en

Amendment 805

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH, respectively, shall consult relevant stakeholders on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.3. The Planner shall consult relevant stakeholders, including the ESABCC and the Stakeholder Reference Group, on the additional data, assumptions and their use for the development of their infrastructure needs identification report.

Or. en

Amendment 806

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.4. Within six months of the publication of the initial scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for gas and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article. Where relevant, projects repurposing gas infrastructure to hydrogen and renewable and low-carbon gases shall be considered as meeting the identified needs and shall be deemed valid, while taking into account the security of gas supply.

Or. en

Justification

Repurposing existing infrastructure has the potential to significantly impact the energy system's carbon footprint and its ability to integrate renewable energy sources. However, the absence of a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of repurposing and other gas system evolutions means missing an opportunity to fully assess how these changes could contribute to emissions reductions and support environmental sustainability. It is essential that security of supply is taken into account.

Amendment 807

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.4. Within twelve months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the comparison of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article. Where relevant, projects repurposing gas infrastructure to hydrogen and renewable and low-carbon gases shall be considered as meeting the identified needs and shall be deemed valid, while taking into account the security of gas supply.

Or. en

Justification

The Infrastructure needs identification report cannot realistically be delivered within six months; therefore, the deadline should be extended to one year. About the part ‘including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified’: this sentence should not imply identifying solutions to the needs, but only comparing existing projects with the needs per border, without concluding that these projects are the solutions. ||| Within the TEN-E proposal, repurposing is explicitly defined and specified in the hydrogen infrastructure category. However, there is a notable absence of considering the impact of repurposing and other gas system evolutions on the whole energy system. It is essential that security of supply needs be taken into account. This absence of a complete view of the whole energy system and its security of supply could potentially result in removing or not investing in essential infrastructure. For proper planning, meeting infrastructure development standards, and to address adequacy needs, the TEN-E Regulation should include a proper gas infrastructure assessment and monitoring at a full energy system level, not just at project levels. The conclusions of the 10th Energy Infrastructure Forum in Copenhagen (CEIF) in June 2024, required ENNOH and ENTSOG to develop a report on criteria for repurposing natural gas infrastructure for hydrogen, which was finalised in November 2025 as requested by the 11th CEIF in June 2025. The described process represents just one possibility to be considered by relevant competent authorities within the Member States for the needed flexibility during the planning process. The findings of this report will be taken into account in the Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2026, as requested by the Forum.

Amendment 808

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.4. Within twelve months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including an assessment of potential sensitivities arising from the interaction between different development trajectories for electricity and hydrogen. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article. Where relevant, projects repurposing gas infrastructure to hydrogen and renewable and low-carbon gases shall be considered as meeting the identified needs and shall be deemed valid, while taking into account the security of gas supply.

Or. en

Amendment 809

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, and every 2 years thereafter, the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH and the ENTSO for gas shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report to the TEN-E Group and to the Agency. The reports shall evaluate how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified and identify gas infrastructure that shall be repurposed or decommissioned due to redundancy or expected redundancy.

Or. en

Justification

Needs assessments should be performed more frequently to account for evolving market trends which could have an impact on infrastructure needs

Amendment 810

Anna Stürgkh, Andreas Glück, Emma Wiesner, Morten Løkkegaard, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.4. Within six months of the publication of delegated act pursuant to Article 11, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall publish their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report and inform the TEN-E Group and the Agency. The reports shall evaluate infrastructure needs on the basis of the scenarios and sensitivities published pursuant to Article 11 and assess how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan adress those needs. The reports shall be based on the most up-to-date information concerning existing infrastructure and projects.

Or. en

Amendment 811

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.4. Within twelve months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report including potential interdependence between the respective development trajectories of the electricity and hydrogen sectors, and the possible implications arising therefrom. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 812

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.4. Within twelve months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including possible sensitivity on how different evolution trends for electricity and hydrogen could affect each other. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 813

András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.4. Within six months of the publication of scenarios scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 814

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, Planner shall submit the draft infrastructure needs identification reports for electricity and hydrogen, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group and to the Stakeholder Reference Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the Planner to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 815

Anna Stürgkh, Emma Wiesner, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including with the requirements referred to in Article 12(2). The Agency shall further assess to which extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union-wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified. Where the Agency identifies deviations or insufficient compliance with the requirements of this Article, it shall be empowered to request amendments to the draft reports, where duly justified. The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall amend the draft report accordingly. Where amendments have been requested by the Agency, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit an amended draft report reflecting the requested amendments within a time specified in the Agency’s request. Within three months of receipt of the draft report or amended draft report, the Agency shall approve it or amend it. Where the Agency intends to amend the report, it shall consult the concerned association, the Commission and the TEN-E Group. If no request is issued within one month, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit them to Agency for approval. The Agency shall inform the TEN-E Group.

Or. en

Justification

Clarification and simplification: ACER is already tasked assessing compliance with the methodology in Paragraph 12 and Annex VII, which are laid out in Article 12(2) (b) and (c). It is unclear why (a) and (d) are of Article 12(2) are not included here as they are mentioned in Annex VII. Article 12(7) allows the TEN-E group to provide comments, which adds another layer of assessment (duplication). Article 12(8) enable the Commission to request updates. These multiple, partially overlapping checks by ACER, TEN-E group and the Commission and unclear references may lead to inconsistencies and procedural inefficiencies. The amendment provides a single, coherent compliance framework.

Amendment 816

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and may request amendments should the reports not comply with such requirements, following consultation with the Commission, the TEN E group, Member States and relevant stakeholders. The Agency shall identify scope and reasons of requested amendments and set an amendment by which an updated report should be submitted. Within three months of receipt of the draft report or amended draft report, the Agency shall approve it or amend it. Where the Agency intends to amend the report, it shall consult the concerned Entity, the Commission and the TEN-E Group. To perform its duty under this Article, the Agency shall also have full access to the input data and modelling tools used to develop the reports.

Or. en

Justification

The needs identification report process should be streamlined to make it more effective and to enhance regulatory oversight, which is key to make sure that decisions on infrastructure are cost effective. The Commission proposal foresees many steps and oversight by many bodies making the approval process longer and not giving clear responsibility to assess the reports to a single body.

Amendment 817

Paolo Borchia, Isabella Tovaglieri, Raffaele Stancanelli

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.

Or. en

Amendment 818

Letizia Moratti, Fulvio Martusciello, Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.

Or. en

Amendment 819

Michael Bloss

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group and the Stakeholder Reference Group.

Or. en

Amendment 820

Jana Nagyová, Ondřej Knotek, Tomáš Kubín, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.

Or. en

Amendment 821

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Francesco Torselli, Lara Magoni, Alessandro Ciriani, Ondřej Krutílek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the framework guidelines referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.

Or. en

Amendment 822

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the assessment to what extent projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.5. Within two months of receipt of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports by the TEN-E Group, the Agency shall assess compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, including the comparison of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, with the methodology referred to in paragraph 12 and the principles set out in Annex VII and inform the TEN-E Group.

Or. en

Justification

The Infrastructure needs identification report should only compare existing projects with the identified cross‑border needs, without concluding that these projects constitute solutions. The proposed amendment is consistent with the proposal under Article 12(5).

Amendment 823

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Within one month of being informed by the Agency about the compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, the TEN-E Group members, taking into account the Agency’s input on compliance, may deliver their comments and inform the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively.deleted

Or. en

Justification

Text deleted to streamline the process in line with proposed amendment to paragraph 5

Amendment 824

Anna Stürgkh, Emma Wiesner, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Within one month of being informed by the Agency about the compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, the TEN-E Group members, taking into account the Agency’s input on compliance, may deliver their comments and inform the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively.deleted

Or. en

Justification

Alignment with changes proposed to Article 12 - paragraph 5.

Amendment 825

Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Christian Ehler, Ioan-Rareş Bogdan, Iuliu Winkler, Gheorghe Falcă, Eva Maydell, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Siegfried Mureşan, Radan Kanev, Daniel Buda, Andrea Wechsler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Within one month of being informed by the Agency about the compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, the TEN-E Group members, taking into account the Agency’s input on compliance, may deliver their comments and inform the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH respectively.6. Within one month of being informed by the Agency about the compliance of the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, the TEN-E Group members, taking into account the Agency’s input on compliance, may deliver their comments and inform the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH.

Or. en

Amendment 826

Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Within two months of having received the comments from the TEN-E Group members, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall adapt the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, taking into account the comments of the TEN-E Group and the Agency, to ensure full compliance with the requirements in paragraph 2, and shall submit the final infrastructure identification report to the Commission.deleted

Or. en

Justification

Text deleted to streamline the process in line with proposed amendment to paragraph 5

Amendment 827

Anna Stürgkh, Emma Wiesner, Morten Løkkegaard, Sophie Wilmès, Bart Groothuis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Within two months of having received the comments from the TEN-E Group members, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall adapt the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, taking into account the comments of the TEN-E Group and the Agency, to ensure full compliance with the requirements in paragraph 2, and shall submit the final infrastructure identification report to the Commission.deleted

Or. en

Justification

Alignment with changes proposed to Article 12 - paragraph 5.

Amendment 828

Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Mirosława Nykiel, Borys Budka, Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Within two months of having received the comments from the TEN-E Group members, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall adapt the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, taking into account the comments of the TEN-E Group and the Agency, to ensure full compliance with the requirements in paragraph 2, and shall submit the final infrastructure identification report to the Commission.7. Within three months of having received the comments from the TEN-E Group members, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall adapt the draft infrastructure needs identification reports, taking into account the comments of the TEN-E Group and the Agency, to ensure full compliance with the requirements in paragraph 2, and shall submit the final draft infrastructure identification report to the TEN- E Group and to the Commission for endorsement.

Or. en

Justification

Under the EC proposal, the review and approval of the Infrastructure needs identification report would take at least 7 months, which is overly complex and exceeds the time allocated to perform the study. The added value of circulating the report to the EC is unclear, as comments from TEN‑E Groups must already be implemented. The process should therefore be simplified by having ENTSO‑E and ENNOH submit updated reports directly to the TEN‑E Groups, with 3 months allocated to consider and implement their comments.