amendment list, 23 April 2026
Establishment of European Business Wallets
Document ITRE-AM-787818 · (COM(2025)0838 – 2025/0358(COD))
Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Full text
Jump to an amendment (244)
- Amendment 371
- Amendment 372
- Amendment 373
- Amendment 374
- Amendment 375
- Amendment 376
- Amendment 377
- Amendment 378
- Amendment 379
- Amendment 380
- Amendment 381
- Amendment 382
- Amendment 383
- Amendment 384
- Amendment 385
- Amendment 386
- Amendment 387
- Amendment 388
- Amendment 389
- Amendment 390
- Amendment 391
- Amendment 392
- Amendment 393
- Amendment 394
- Amendment 395
- Amendment 396
- Amendment 397
- Amendment 398
- Amendment 399
- Amendment 400
- Amendment 401
- Amendment 402
- Amendment 403
- Amendment 404
- Amendment 405
- Amendment 406
- Amendment 407
- Amendment 408
- Amendment 409
- Amendment 410
- Amendment 411
- Amendment 412
- Amendment 413
- Amendment 414
- Amendment 415
- Amendment 416
- Amendment 417
- Amendment 418
- Amendment 419
- Amendment 420
- Amendment 421
- Amendment 422
- Amendment 423
- Amendment 424
- Amendment 425
- Amendment 426
- Amendment 427
- Amendment 428
- Amendment 429
- Amendment 430
- Amendment 431
- Amendment 432
- Amendment 433
- Amendment 434
- Amendment 435
- Amendment 436
- Amendment 437
- Amendment 438
- Amendment 439
- Amendment 440
- Amendment 441
- Amendment 442
- Amendment 443
- Amendment 444
- Amendment 445
- Amendment 446
- Amendment 447
- Amendment 448
- Amendment 449
- Amendment 450
- Amendment 451
- Amendment 452
- Amendment 453
- Amendment 454
- Amendment 455
- Amendment 456
- Amendment 457
- Amendment 458
- Amendment 459
- Amendment 460
- Amendment 461
- Amendment 462
- Amendment 463
- Amendment 464
- Amendment 465
- Amendment 466
- Amendment 467
- Amendment 468
- Amendment 469
- Amendment 470
- Amendment 471
- Amendment 472
- Amendment 473
- Amendment 474
- Amendment 475
- Amendment 476
- Amendment 477
- Amendment 478
- Amendment 479
- Amendment 480
- Amendment 481
- Amendment 482
- Amendment 483
- Amendment 484
- Amendment 485
- Amendment 486
- Amendment 487
- Amendment 488
- Amendment 489
- Amendment 490
- Amendment 491
- Amendment 492
- Amendment 493
- Amendment 494
- Amendment 495
- Amendment 496
- Amendment 497
- Amendment 498
- Amendment 499
- Amendment 500
- Amendment 501
- Amendment 502
- Amendment 503
- Amendment 504
- Amendment 505
- Amendment 506
- Amendment 507
- Amendment 508
- Amendment 509
- Amendment 510
- Amendment 511
- Amendment 512
- Amendment 513
- Amendment 514
- Amendment 515
- Amendment 516
- Amendment 517
- Amendment 518
- Amendment 519
- Amendment 520
- Amendment 521
- Amendment 522
- Amendment 523
- Amendment 524
- Amendment 525
- Amendment 526
- Amendment 527
- Amendment 528
- Amendment 529
- Amendment 530
- Amendment 531
- Amendment 532
- Amendment 533
- Amendment 534
- Amendment 535
- Amendment 536
- Amendment 537
- Amendment 538
- Amendment 539
- Amendment 540
- Amendment 541
- Amendment 542
- Amendment 543
- Amendment 544
- Amendment 545
- Amendment 546
- Amendment 547
- Amendment 548
- Amendment 549
- Amendment 550
- Amendment 551
- Amendment 552
- Amendment 553
- Amendment 554
- Amendment 555
- Amendment 556
- Amendment 557
- Amendment 558
- Amendment 559
- Amendment 560
- Amendment 561
- Amendment 562
- Amendment 563
- Amendment 564
- Amendment 565
- Amendment 566
- Amendment 567
- Amendment 568
- Amendment 569
- Amendment 570
- Amendment 571
- Amendment 572
- Amendment 573
- Amendment 574
- Amendment 575
- Amendment 576
- Amendment 577
- Amendment 578
- Amendment 579
- Amendment 580
- Amendment 581
- Amendment 582
- Amendment 583
- Amendment 584
- Amendment 585
- Amendment 586
- Amendment 587
- Amendment 588
- Amendment 589
- Amendment 590
- Amendment 591
- Amendment 592
- Amendment 593
- Amendment 594
- Amendment 595
- Amendment 596
- Amendment 597
- Amendment 598
- Amendment 599
- Amendment 600
- Amendment 601
- Amendment 602
- Amendment 603
- Amendment 604
- Amendment 605
- Amendment 606
- Amendment 607
- Amendment 608
- Amendment 609
- Amendment 610
- Amendment 611
- Amendment 612
- Amendment 613
- Amendment 614
Text 1,540 paragraphs
Amendment 371
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) 'European Business Wallet back-end' means the server-side components, including software, services, and infrastructure, that provide the necessary functionality and support for the European Business Wallet Frontend, and form part of the European Business Wallet unit. | (43) 'European Business Wallet back-end' means the server-side components, including software, services, and infrastructure, that provide the necessary functionality and support for the European Business Wallet front-end, and form part of the European Business Wallet unit. |
Or. en
Amendment 372
Rihards Kols, Francesco Torselli
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. Public sector bodies may, in accordance with Union and national law, provide that the use of European Business Wallets constitutes the standard channel for performing such actions, provided that this does not deprive economic operators of access to procedures and takes into account the specific situation of SMEs and micro-enterprises. |
Or. en
Read the rest (1,528 paragraphs)
Justification
Clarifies that authorities can legitimately make the Wallet the standard channel for covered interactions, reinforcing simplification and uptake, while safeguarding access and proportionality for smaller operators.
Amendment 373
Angelika Winzig, Lukas Mandl
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a European Business Wallet owner or an authorised representative, with respective liability consequences for the owner, makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting actions and transactions should not be denied legal effect only based on the fact of it being in electronic form. The use of the core functionalities shall have the same legal effect as actions and transactions lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. |
Or. en
Amendment 374
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. This relates only to the legal effect of the digital means of transmission and authentication. |
Or. en
Amendment 375
Daniel Buda, Virgil-Daniel Popescu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements, as is provided for in Regulation EU (No) 910/2014. |
Or. ro
Justification
Principiul echivalenței juridice este formulat în sens prea larg, putând chiar să trateze acțiunile ilicite care rezultă din utilizarea unui portofel european pentru întreprinderi „ca și cum” ar fi fost „efectuate în mod legal”. Ar trebui clarificat faptul că domeniul de aplicare al principiului echivalenței este limitat de cadrul juridic stabilit al Regulamentului (UE) nr. 910/2014, astfel cum a fost modificat prin Regulamentul (UE) 2024/1183, care ar include deferența regulamentului respectiv față de controalele preventive publice care protejează credibilitatea registrelor publice – în special a registrului comerțului – ca sursă esențială de securitate juridică în tranzacțiile transfrontaliere, astfel cum se specifică în considerentul 46 din Regulamentul (UE) 2024/1183.
Amendment 376
Peter Agius, Michalis Hadjipantela
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements as required under Regulation (EU) 910/2014. |
Or. en
Justification
The principle of legal equivalence is formulated too broadly, potentially treating illicit actions via a European Business Wallet "as if" they had been "lawfully carried out". It should be clarified that its scope is circumscribed by Regulation (EU) 910/2014 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2-24/1183, including deference to public preventive controls safeguarding the trustworthiness of public registers - especially the commercial register - as key to legal certainty in cross-border transactions as specified in Recital 46 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1183.
Amendment 377
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4.º – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a European Business Wallet owner or an authorised representative makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. |
Or. pt
Justification
Action performed by an authorised representative must be equivalent in its effects to that by European Business Wallet owners.
Amendment 378
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a European Business Wallet owner or authorised user makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. |
Or. en
Amendment 379
Angelika Niebler
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the exact same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. |
Or. en
Amendment 380
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a self-employed person or a sole trader makes use of the qualified electronic registered delivery service in the circumstances set out in Article 5(3), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a self-employed person or a sole trader makes use of the qualified electronic registered delivery service in the circumstances set out in Article 5(3), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. This relates solely to the legal effect of the digital means of transmission and authentication. |
Or. en
Amendment 381
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a self-employed person or a sole trader makes use of the qualified electronic registered delivery service in the circumstances set out in Article 5(3), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. | Where a self-employed person or a sole trader makes use of the qualified electronic registered delivery service as a standalone service in line with Article 5(3), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. |
Or. en
Amendment 382
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Electronic attestations of attributes issued or exchanged through a European Business Wallet shall be admissible as documentary evidence in civil and commercial proceedings before the courts of the Member States without requiring apostille, legalisation or any additional form of authentication. No legal effect, validity or enforceability shall be denied to such attestations solely on the grounds that they are in electronic form. Courts shall not require the production of a paper equivalent of an attestation validly presented through a European Business Wallet. |
Or. en
Amendment 383
Daniel Buda, Virgil-Daniel Popescu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| This principle of equivalence shall be without prejudice to procedural requirements which may form part of an administrative procedure and which cannot be fulfilled by the core functionalities of the European Business Wallets, such as requirements relating to complementary public controls, including on identity, legal capacity and legality. |
Or. ro
Justification
Textul și obiectivul de reglementare al considerentului 6 din propunerea de regulament ar trebui, de asemenea, să fie consacrate în partea obligatorie din punct de vedere juridic a regulamentului, pentru a se asigura că beneficiile sociale ale controalelor preventive publice, cum ar fi protecția consumatorilor în tranzacțiile cu risc ridicat, nu pot fi eludate prin utilizarea funcționalităților de bază ale portofelului european pentru întreprinderi. În acest scop, controalele preventive efectuate de autoritățile publice neutre pentru a asigura cunoașterea sau înțelegerea conținutului unui document sau a implicațiilor semnării unui contract, precum și legalitatea acestuia sunt garanții sociale esențiale pe care regulamentul propus nu ar trebui să le împiedice.
Amendment 384
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The principle of equivalence established by paragraph 1 shall not be construed as waiving or superseding any requirement of form, authentication, notarisation, legalisation or registration imposed by Union or national law as a condition of the validity, enforceability or third-party effect of the legal act concerned. Where a legal act requires the intervention of a competent public authority or official under applicable national or Union law, the European Business Wallet may serve as a channel for digital communication or document delivery but shall not substitute for that intervention. |
Or. en
Amendment 385
Peter Agius, Michalis Hadjipantela
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article4a | |
| This principle of equivalence is without prejudice to procedural requirements that might be part of an administrative procedure and that cannot be fulfilled by the core functionalities of the European Business Wallets such as requirements related to complementary public controls including of identity, legal capacity, and legality. | |
| 1a | |
| 1a Amendment for a new paragraph 3 |
Or. en
Justification
The text and regulatory aim of Recital 6 of the proposed regulation should be enshrined in binding provisions to ensure the social benefits of public preventive controls, especially consumer protection in high-risk transactions, cannot be circumvented through the European Business Wallet’s core functions. In particular, checks by neutral public authorities ensuring awareness and understanding of the content of documents, the implications of signing, and their legality are essential social safeguards that the regulation should not preclude.
Amendment 386
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that the European Business Wallets they provide enable European Business Wallet owners to make use of the following core functionalities: | 1. Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that the European Business Wallets they provide offer the following core functionalities, allowing owners to utilize any combination of these features at their own discretion: |
Or. en
Amendment 387
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a a) translate or facilitate the comprehension of electronic attestations of attributes, electronic documents and communications by means of artificial intelligence-based translation tools or similar automated language processing technologies, in order to support cross-border usability and multilingual interaction. |
Or. en
Amendment 388
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) request and share European Business Wallet owner identification data and electronic attestations of attributes in a secured way between European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets and with European Business Wallet-relying parties; | (c) securely request and share European Business Wallet owner identification data and electronic attestations of attributes between European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets and with European Business Wallet-relying parties; |
Or. en
Amendment 389
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) issue electronic attestations of attributes to European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets; | (f) issue, on behalf of the European Business Wallet owner, electronic attestations of attributes relating to data for which the European Business Wallet owner is the primary source to European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets; |
Or. en
Amendment 390
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) issue electronic attestations of attributes through the European Business Wallet of the owner, allowing the issued attestation to be linked to other relevant attestations forming part of a chain; | (g) link electronic attestations of attributes issued pursuant to point (f) to other electronic attestations of attributes forming part of a chain; |
Or. en
Amendment 391
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) issue electronic attestations of attributes through the European Business Wallet of the owner, allowing the issued attestation to be linked to other relevant attestations forming part of a chain; | (g) issue electronic attestations of attributes through the European Business Wallet of the owner, allowing the issued attestation to be linked to other relevant attestations; |
Or. en
Amendment 392
Eero Heinäluoma
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) enable the use of qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes to allow European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives to authenticate themselves; | (h) enable the use of qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes to allow authentication of European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives; |
Or. en
Amendment 393
Jüri Ratas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) enable the use of qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes to allow European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives to authenticate themselves; | (h) enable the use of qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes to allow authentication of European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives; |
Or. en
Amendment 394
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) enable the use of qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes to allow European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives to authenticate themselves; | (h) enable the use of qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes to allow European Business Wallet owners and their authorised users to authenticate themselves; |
Or. en
Amendment 395
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) transmit and receive electronic documents and data by means of a qualified electronic registered delivery service capable of supporting confidentiality and integrity; | (i) transmit and receive electronic documents and data including by means of a qualified electronic registered delivery service capable of supporting confidentiality and integrity; |
Or. en
Amendment 396
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations; | (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations, according to specific and detailed access rights, and enable the owner to define, manage, monitor and revoke these specific roles and permissions at any time; |
Or. en
Amendment 397
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations; | (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations with a complete and immutable audit trail of all authorisations granted, modified and revoked, recording the identity of the authorising person and the date and time of each action; |
Or. en
Amendment 398
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations; | (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, including by creating clearly defined delegations of powers, mandates and roles and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations; |
Or. en
Amendment 399
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations; | (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, for a clearly delimited time period, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations; |
Or. ro
Amendment 400
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations; | (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations, including roles; |
Or. en
Amendment 401
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point l
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (l) export their data, including issued European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestations of attributes, communication logs, and interaction records, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format, at the request of the owner or in the event of termination of service or revocation of the notification of the provider of the European Business Wallet; | (l) export their data, including issued European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestations of attributes, communication and transaction logs, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format, or in the event of termination of service or revocation of the notification of the provider of the European Business Wallet; |
Or. en
Amendment 402
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5.º – paragraph 1 – point l
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (l) export their data, including issued European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestations of attributes, communication logs, and interaction records, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format, at the request of the owner or in the event of termination of service or revocation of the notification of the provider of the European Business Wallet; | (l) export their data, including issued European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestations of attributes, communication logs, and transaction records, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format, at the request of the owner or in the event of termination of service or revocation of the notification of the provider of the European Business Wallet; |
Or. pt
Amendment 403
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5.º – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (la) import their data as set out in point (l), in order to benefit from data portability across European Business Wallet providers |
Or. pt
Amendment 404
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (l a) import their data as referred to in point (l) in order to enable data portability between European Business Wallet providers; |
Or. en
Amendment 405
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point m
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (m) access a log of all transactions; | (m) access a log of all transactions, which shall be exclusively accessible to the owner or their authorised representatives; |
Or. en
Amendment 406
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point m
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (m) access a log of all transactions; | (m) access a log of all communications and transactions; |
Or. en
Amendment 407
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5.º – paragraph 1 – point m
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (m) access a log of all transactions; | (m) access a log of all communications and transactions; |
Or. pt
Amendment 408
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point n
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (n) access a common dashboard for accessing, storing and verifying communications exchanged through the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in point (i). | (n) access a dashboard for accessing, storing and verifying communications exchanged through the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in point (i). |
Or. en
Amendment 409
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (n a) Authorise payment transactions and enable automatic payments, such as invoices issued by suppliers authenticated by the European Business Wallet. |
Or. en
Amendment 410
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1 a. Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that the mandate and authorisation system referred to in paragraph 1, point (j), includes: (a) a simplified single-tier delegation option for micro-enterprises as defined in Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC and for self-employed persons, enabling designation of a single authorised representative without requiring configuration of role hierarchies or recourse to external legal advice for purely internal operational delegations; (b) clear technical enforcement of the scope of authority of each authorised representative, preventing actions that exceed the scope of the granted mandate; (c) a complete and tamper-proof record of all transactions carried out by each authorised representative, accessible to the wallet owner at any time and free of charge; (d) the ability for the wallet owner to record, by written declaration within the Wallet, the allocation of civil liability for acts performed by an authorised representative to the natural or legal person to whom the mandate was granted, without prejudice to rules on apparent authority under applicable national law; (e) the ability for the wallet owner to revoke any mandate with immediate effect and without prior notice. |
Or. en
Amendment 411
Rihards Kols, Francesco Torselli
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities do not interfere with or compromise the confidentiality, availability, or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide. | 2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities do not interfere with or compromise the confidentiality, availability, or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide. Such additional functionalities shall not result in disproportionate complexity or cost for economic operators, in particular SMEs and small mid-caps, and shall not be used to make access to the core functionalities conditional upon the use of optional services. |
Or. en
Justification
Prevents unnecessary expansion of features and tying practices that would make Wallet use more complex or costly for SMEs, ensuring that optional services remain genuinely optional and do not undermine the core simplification objective.
Amendment 412
Morten Løkkegaard, Christophe Grudler, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Sophie Wilmès
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities do not interfere with or compromise the confidentiality, availability, or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide. | 2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities do not interfere with or compromise the confidentiality, availability, or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide. Such additional functionalities could support interoperability with company IT systems through standardised interfaces where appropriate. |
Or. en
Amendment 413
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities do not interfere with or compromise the confidentiality, availability, or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide. | 2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities do not interfere with or compromise the confidentiality, availability, or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, that the underlying data and cloud infrastructures are hosted within the Union and subject to its jurisdiction, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide. |
Or. en
Amendment 414
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities do not interfere with or compromise the confidentiality, availability, or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide. | 2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities do not interfere with or compromise the confidentiality, availability, security or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide. |
Or. en
Amendment 415
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall implement the functionalities referred to in paragraph 1 in accordance with requirements set out in the Annex. | 4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall implement the functionalities referred to in paragraph 1 in accordance with the requirements set out in the Annex. |
Or. en
Amendment 416
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5.º – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the core functionalities of European Business Wallets referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the core functionalities of European Business Wallets, including those critical for interoperability and security and those that can help Member States meet their obligations in Article 16, referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. pt
Justification
Need to provide the Member States with legal certainty and clarity and ensure the security and interoperability of the European Business Wallets.
Amendment 417
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the core functionalities of European Business Wallets referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the core functionalities of European Business Wallets referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19 and no later than 12 months after the entry into force of the Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 418
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the core functionalities of European Business Wallets referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 5. The Commission shall, by [12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the core functionalities of European Business Wallets referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 419
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5 a. Providers of European Business Wallets shall offer the functionalities referred to in paragraph 1 no later than 12 months after the entry into force of the implementing acts referred in paragraph 5. |
Or. en
Amendment 420
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) to allow interaction with the European Business Wallets automatically without manual intervention or through direct user action; | (d) to allow interaction with the European Business Wallets automatically without manual intervention or through direct user action, provided such automated processes are verifiable and auditable and ensure an equivalent level of assurance and accountability as interactions performed by an authorised user; |
Or. en
Amendment 421
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) to allow interaction with the European Business Wallets automatically without manual intervention or through direct user action; | (d) to allow interaction with the European Business Wallets automatically without manual intervention or through direct user action while ensuring a level of security and accountability equivalent to that of interactions performed by an authorised user; |
Or. en
Amendment 422
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) to securely onboard the European Business Wallet owner remotely via an authorised representative with an electronic identification means of that authorised representative which meets the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 with regard to the assurance levels ‘substantial’ or ‘high’; | (e) to securely onboard the European Business Wallet owner remotely via a representative empowered to carry out the onboarding process with an electronic identification means of that authorised representative which meets the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 with regard to the assurance levels ‘substantial’ or ‘high’; |
Or. en
Amendment 423
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) for authenticating European Business Wallet-relying parties by implementing authentication mechanisms, where authentication is required; | (g) for authenticating European Business Wallet-relying parties by implementing authentication mechanisms, where authentication is required, through the assuring of data protection measures; |
Or. ro
Amendment 424
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) for European Business Wallet-relying parties to verify the authenticity and validity of European Business Wallets, where the verification of the authenticity and validity is required; | (h) to verify the authenticity and validity of European Business Wallets; |
Or. en
Amendment 425
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) for the assigning to each European Business Wallet owner, for the purposes of the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i) and the European Digital Directory referred to in Article 10, at least one unique digital address; | (j) for the assigning to each European Business Wallet owner, for the purposes of the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i) and the European Digital Directory referred to in Article 10, at least one unique digital address which shall take into account the European Unique Identifier (EUID) as established under Directive (EU) 2017/1132; |
Or. en
Amendment 426
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point l
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (l) for the management of critical assets, for the use of at least one wallet secure cryptographic application and wallet secure cryptographic device and, where critical assets relate to performing electronic identification at assurance level substantial, for ensuring that such cryptographic operators or other operations processing critical assets are performed in accordance with the requirements for the characteristics and design of electronic identification means at assurance level substantial as set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502. | (l) for the management of critical assets, for the use of at least one wallet secure cryptographic application and wallet secure cryptographic device and, where critical assets relate to performing electronic identification at assurance level high, for ensuring that such cryptographic operators or other operations processing critical assets are performed in accordance with the requirements for the characteristics and design of electronic identification means at assurance level high as set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502. |
Or. en
Amendment 427
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6.º – paragraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Providers of European Business Wallets shall provide, as a separate service, requesting public sector bodies without a European Business Wallet with a unique digital address for the purposes of registration in the European Digital Directory and activation of the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). |
Or. pt
Justification
Enables a public body to send and receive data via the service mentioned in Article 5(1), point (i) despite not owning a European Business Wallet
Amendment 428
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) ensure that the European Business Wallet owner identification data is digitally associated with the European Business Wallet of the owner; | (a) ensure that the European Business Wallet owner identification data is uniquely and securely attributed to the European Business Wallet of the owner; |
Or. en
Amendment 429
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) ensure that the European Business Wallet owner identification data is digitally associated with the European Business Wallet of the owner; | (a) ensure that the European Business Wallet owner identification data is cryptographically bound with the European Business Wallet of the owner; |
Or. en
Amendment 430
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – mappings between roles and attributes are verifiable, auditable, revocable and traceable to their legitimate issuers; | – mappings between roles and attributes are detailed, verifiable, auditable, revocable and traceable to their legitimate issuers. This includes the ability for the owner to restrict access to specific documents or functionalities based on the user's role; |
Or. en
Amendment 431
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6.º – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| — all authorisation logic is interoperable across Member States. | – all authorisation logic is interoperable across European Business Wallets. |
Or. pt
Justification
Interoperability is needed across wallets, not Member States
Amendment 432
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c a) ensure that data related to European Business Wallets is processed and stored with the Union. |
Or. en
Amendment 433
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c b) ensure that for the purpose of the functionality refers to in article 5(1) point (l) the owners of the European Business Wallet are provided with mechanisms to achieve unhindered data portability. |
Or. en
Amendment 434
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f – indent 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – upon the explicit request of the European Business Wallet owner; | – upon the explicit request of the European Business Wallet owner or authorised user, where the authorisation includes this power; |
Or. en
Amendment 435
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6.º – paragraph 2 – point f – indent 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| — where the provider of the European Business Wallet is not included in the list referred to in Article 12(5). | – where the provider of the European Business Wallet is not included in the list referred to in Article 12(3). |
Or. pt
Amendment 436
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f – indent 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – where the provider of the European Business Wallet is not included in the list referred to in Article 12(5). | – where the provider of the European Business Wallet is not included in the list referred to in Article 12(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 437
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f – indent 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – where the provider of the European Business Wallet is not included in the list referred to in Article 12(5). | – where the provider of the European Business Wallet is not included in the list referred to in Article 12(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 438
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall implement the technical features provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 in accordance with the requirements set out in the Annex. | 4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall implement the technical features provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 in accordance with the requirements set out in the Annex and the implementing acts, pursuant to paragraph 5. |
Or. en
Amendment 439
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall implement the technical features provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 in accordance with the requirements set out in the Annex. | 4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall implement the technical features provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 in accordance with the requirements set out in the Annex and implementing acts, pursuant to paragraph 5. |
Or. en
Amendment 440
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the technical features of European Business Wallets provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, and within the limits of the rules defined in this Regulation and its Annex, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the technical features of European Business Wallets provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 441
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the technical features of European Business Wallets provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the technical features of European Business Wallets provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19 and no later than 12 months after the entry into force of the Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 442
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the technical features of European Business Wallets provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 5. The Commission shall, by [12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the technical features of European Business Wallets provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 443
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. European Business Wallets shall be provided by providers of European Business Wallets that are included in the list established pursuant to Article 12(5). | 1. European Business Wallets shall be provided by providers of European Business Wallets that are included in the list established pursuant to Article 12(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 444
Rihards Kols, Francesco Torselli
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. | 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular, they shall not be subject to operational control by a third country or a third-country entity, including through rights or arrangements that enable a third-country public authority or entity to determine or materially influence strategic decisions concerning the governance, compliance, risk management, security policies or regulatory alignment of the provider. Providers shall be subject to effective Union-based governance and supervision within the Union. |
Or. en
Justification
Gives concrete effect to the security requirement by excluding providers under third‑country operational control and tying provider status to effective EU jurisdiction and supervision, while leveraging the existing qualified trust service provider framework.
Amendment 445
Fulvio Martusciello
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. | 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to operational control by a third country or by a third-country entity, including EU-based governance and effective supervision within the Union. |
| Eligibility should be anchored in the existing eIDAS framework, meaning that providers already authorised as Qualified Trust Service Providers (and therefore fully supervised under EU law) shall be eligible to provide the European Business Wallet. |
Or. en
Amendment 446
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. | 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union, process and store data within the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to either direct or indirect control by a third country or by a third-country entity. The concept of control should be understood in line with Regulation (EU) 2019/452, and in particular having due regard to a company´s ownership structure, significant funding and applicability of third country legislation that impacts the jurisdiction over the company or data. |
Or. en
Amendment 447
Francesco Torselli, Rihards Kols
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. | 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular, they shall not be subject to operational control by a third country or by a third-country entity in relation to the European Business Wallets services and data. Providers established in the Union and granted status as qualified trust service providers in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 shall automatically be eligible to provide European Business Wallet services. |
Or. en
Amendment 448
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. | 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. Furthermore, providers shall ensure that all data and metadata related to the operation of the European Business Wallet are stored and processed exclusively on cloud infrastructures located within the Union and subject to Union law. |
Or. en
Amendment 449
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. | 2. Providers of European Business Wallets and supporting infrastructure service providers that host European Business Wallet data shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. European Business Wallet data shall be stored and processed in the Union. |
Or. en
Amendment 450
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7.º – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. The Commission shall issue guidance specifying the tools, indicators and assessment frameworks suitable for determining whether European Business Wallets present risks to the security of the Union within the meaning of this article, including for the purposes of assessing whether such providers are subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. |
Or. pt
Amendment 451
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall comply with the requirements set out in Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Covered by paragraph 5
Amendment 452
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Providers of European Business Wallets shall comply with applicable cybersecurity requirements laid down in Union and national law, including those relating to the identification of high-risk suppliers. Providers shall also ensure that their suppliers of software and security solutions comply with these requirements and conform to the relevant security standards and requirements. | 5. Providers of European Business Wallets are to be considered critical entities in the meaning of the cybersecurity legislation and shall comply with applicable cybersecurity requirements laid down in Union and national law, including those relating to the identification of high-risk suppliers. Providers shall also ensure that their suppliers of software and security solutions comply with these requirements and conform to the relevant security standards and requirements. |
Or. en
Amendment 453
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Providers of European Business Wallets shall comply with applicable cybersecurity requirements laid down in Union and national law, including those relating to the identification of high-risk suppliers. Providers shall also ensure that their suppliers of software and security solutions comply with these requirements and conform to the relevant security standards and requirements. | 5. Providers of European Business Wallets shall comply with applicable cybersecurity requirements laid down in Union and national law, including Regulation ... [ Cybersecurity Act 2 as proposed in COM (2026)11] and those relating to the identification of high-risk suppliers. Providers shall also ensure that their suppliers of software and security solutions comply with these requirements and conform to the relevant security standards and requirements. |
Or. en
Amendment 454
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, interoperability, and availability of the European Business Wallets they provide with other European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets; | (a) implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the security, confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, interoperability, and availability of the European Business Wallets they provide with other European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets; |
Or. en
Amendment 455
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) ensure that European Business Wallet owners are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about the terms and conditions of use of the European Business Wallet, including the scope and limitations of core and additional functionalities, cybersecurity standards, and the European Business Wallet owner’s rights with regard to data portability, redress, and termination of service; | (b) ensure that European Business Wallet owners are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about the terms and conditions of use of the European Business Wallet, and of any change thereof, including the scope and limitations of core and additional functionalities, cybersecurity standards, and the European Business Wallet owner’s rights with regard to data portability, redress, and termination of service; |
Or. en
Amendment 456
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) ensure that European Business Wallet owners are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about the terms and conditions of use of the European Business Wallet, including the scope and limitations of core and additional functionalities, cybersecurity standards, and the European Business Wallet owner’s rights with regard to data portability, redress, and termination of service; | (b) ensure that European Business Wallet owners and their authorised users are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about the terms and conditions of use of the European Business Wallet, including the scope and limitations of core and additional functionalities, cybersecurity standards, and the European Business Wallet owner’s rights with regard to data portability, redress, and termination of service; |
Or. en
Amendment 457
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) ensure that authorised representatives of European Business Wallet owners are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about their rights and obligations in relation to their European Business Wallet unit, in particular, the right to request revocation of their wallet unit attestation, using the authentication mechanism provided in point 1 of the Annex; | (c) ensure that European Business Wallet owners and their authorised users are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about their rights and obligations in relation to their European Business Wallet unit, in particular, the right to request revocation of their European Business Wallet unit attestation, using the authentication mechanism provided in point 1 of the Annex; |
Or. en
Amendment 458
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7.º – paragraph 6 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) ensure that authorised representatives of European Business Wallet owners are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about their rights and obligations in relation to their European Business Wallet unit, in particular, the right to request revocation of their wallet unit attestation, using the authentication mechanism provided in point 1 of the Annex; | (c) ensure that European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about their rights and obligations in relation to their European Business Wallet unit, in particular, the right to request revocation of their wallet unit attestation, using the authentication mechanism provided in point 1 of the Annex; |
Or. pt
Amendment 459
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7.º – paragraph 6 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) cooperate with the competent supervisory bodies referred to in Article 13(1), or with the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 13(10) and 14(1) and respond without undue delay to any request for information or documentation necessary to verify compliance with this Regulation; | (d) cooperate with the competent supervisory bodies referred to in Article 13(1), or with the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 13(10) and 15(1) and respond without undue delay to any request for information or documentation necessary to verify compliance with this Regulation; |
Or. pt
Amendment 460
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) cooperate with the competent supervisory bodies referred to in Article 13(1), or with the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 13(10) and 14(1) and respond without undue delay to any request for information or documentation necessary to verify compliance with this Regulation; | (d) cooperate with the competent supervisory bodies referred to in Article 13(1), or with the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 13(10) and 15(1) and respond without undue delay to any request for information or documentation necessary to verify compliance with this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 461
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) cooperate with the competent supervisory bodies referred to in Article 13(1), or with the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 13(10) and 14(1) and respond without undue delay to any request for information or documentation necessary to verify compliance with this Regulation; | (d) cooperate with the competent supervisory bodies referred to in Article 13(1), or with the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 13(10) and 15(1) and respond without undue delay to any request for information or documentation necessary to verify compliance with this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 462
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) notify the relevant national supervisory bodies, or the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 14(1), of any substantive changes to their services or overall structure which may impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation; | (e) notify without undue delay the relevant national supervisory bodies, or the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 15(1), of any substantive changes to their services, including the intention to suspend or terminate services, or overall structure which may impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 463
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7.º – paragraph 6 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) notify the relevant national supervisory bodies, or the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 14(1), of any substantive changes to their services or overall structure which may impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation; | (e) notify the relevant national supervisory bodies, or the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 15(1), of any substantive changes to their services, including the intention to cease their activities, or overall structure which may impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation; |
Or. pt
Amendment 464
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) notify the relevant national supervisory bodies, or the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 14(1), of any substantive changes to their services or overall structure which may impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation; | (e) notify the relevant national supervisory bodies, or the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 15(1), of any substantive changes to their services or overall structure which may impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 465
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) notify European Business Wallet owners in the event of suspension, revocation or voluntary termination of the providers of European Business Wallet`s services and of the removal of the provider of European Business Wallet from the list established pursuant to Article 12(5) and ensure the transfer or deletion of the European Business Wallet owner data in accordance with the European Business Wallet owners instructions, including European Business Wallet owner identification data; | (f) notify European Business Wallet owners in the event of suspension, revocation or voluntary termination of the services offered by the providers of European Business Wallets and of the removal of the provider of European Business Wallets from the list established pursuant to Article 12(3) and ensure the transfer or deletion of the European Business Wallet owner data in accordance with the European Business Wallet owners instructions, including European Business Wallet owner identification data; |
Or. en
Amendment 466
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) notify European Business Wallet owners in the event of suspension, revocation or voluntary termination of the providers of European Business Wallet`s services and of the removal of the provider of European Business Wallet from the list established pursuant to Article 12(5) and ensure the transfer or deletion of the European Business Wallet owner data in accordance with the European Business Wallet owners instructions, including European Business Wallet owner identification data; | (f) notify European Business Wallet owners in the event of suspension, revocation or voluntary termination of the providers of European Business Wallet`s services and of the removal of the provider of European Business Wallet from the list established pursuant to Article 12(3) and ensure the transfer or deletion of the European Business Wallet owner data in accordance with the European Business Wallet owners instructions, including European Business Wallet owner identification data; |
Or. en
Amendment 467
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) ensure that the information on European Business Wallet owners, pursuant to Article 10(2), is notified to the Commission and that the information initially submitted to the Commission is kept up to date and corroborated using the providers of the European Business Wallet owner identification data issuing the unique identifiers referred to in Article 8(5), point (b). | (g) ensure that the information on European Business Wallet owners, pursuant to Article 10(2), is notified to the Commission and that the information initially submitted to the Commission only for the technical maintenance of the European Digital Directory, is kept up to date and corroborated using the providers of the European Business Wallet owner identification data issuing the unique identifiers referred to in Article 8(5), point (b). |
Or. en
Amendment 468
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) ensure that the information on European Business Wallet owners, pursuant to Article 10(2), is notified to the Commission and that the information initially submitted to the Commission is kept up to date and corroborated using the providers of the European Business Wallet owner identification data issuing the unique identifiers referred to in Article 8(5), point (b). | (g) ensure that the information on European Business Wallet owners, pursuant to Article 10(2), is notified to the Commission and that the information initially submitted to the Commission is kept up to date and corroborated by the providers of the European Business Wallet owner identification data through the issuance of the unique identifiers referred to in Article 8(5), point (b). |
Or. en
Amendment 469
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7.º – paragraph 6 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Providers of European Business Wallets shall keep a detailed and up-to-date record of the risk assessment referred to in Article 11(2), point (b). |
Or. pt
Amendment 470
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7.º – paragraph 6 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6b. Providers of European Business Wallets shall update the risk assessment referred to in Article 11(2), point (b) every 24 months or immediately in the event of: | |
| (a) a significant incident; | |
| (b) a substantial change to the architecture, security features, cryptographic elements, critical suppliers or core functionalities of the European Business Wallet; | |
| (c) the suspension, revocation or material alteration of a feature affecting the security, validity, authenticity or portability of the European Business Wallet; | |
| (d) a new risk identified by the risk assessment referred to in paragraph 6(a). |
Or. pt
Amendment 471
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7.º – paragraph 6 c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6c. By [OP: Please insert the date = 1 year after entry into force of this regulation], the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for paragraph 3. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. pt
Amendment 472
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data shall issue European Business Wallet owner identification data to European Business Wallets of European Business Wallet owners. Where European Business Wallet owners are Union entities, the Commission shall issue European Business Wallet owner identification data to the European Business Wallets of those Union entities. | 1. Providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data shall issue European Business Wallet owner identification data to European Business Wallets of European Business Wallet owners. |
Or. en
Amendment 473
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1 a. Where European Business Wallet owners are Union entities, the Commission shall issue European Business Wallet owner identification data to the European Business Wallets of those Union entities. |
Or. en
Amendment 474
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) electronic attestations of attributes issued by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source, when provided by a public sector body so responsible; | (b) electronic attestations of attributes issued by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source; |
Or. en
Amendment 475
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. European Business Wallet owner identification data shall contain at least the following attributes: | 5. European Business Wallet owner identification data shall contain only those attributes that are strictly necessary for the specific purpose for which identification is required, in accordance with the principle of data minimisation laid down in Article 5(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Identification data shall in all cases include at a minimum: |
Or. en
Amendment 476
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the relevant unique identifier attributed in accordance with Article 9. | (b) the relevant unique identifier attributed in accordance with Article 9, which shall, where the economic operator already holds a recognised international identifier under Union law, be aligned with or linked to that identifier in order to avoid duplicative registration. |
Or. en
Amendment 477
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Any additional attribute shall require a specific and documented legal basis, shall be strictly proportionate to the purpose for which it is collected, and shall not be retained for purposes other than those for which it was originally gathered. The Commission shall not expand the categories of attributes required in identification data through implementing acts without submitting a prior legislative proposal pursuant to Article 289 TFEU. |
Or. en
Amendment 478
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) contact details of the economic operator or public sector body, as recorded in the relevant register or official record; |
Or. en
Amendment 479
Morten Løkkegaard, Christophe Grudler, João Cotrim De Figueiredo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (C) where available, Legal Entity Identifier of the economic operator. |
Or. en
Amendment 480
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5 a. Owners of European Business Wallets shall have the following rights in respect of their identification data and all other data stored in connection with their Wallet, which shall be directly enforceable before the competent courts of the Member States: (a) the right to access, at any time and free of charge, a complete copy of all data stored in connection with their Wallet in a structured, commonly used and human-readable format; (b) the right to data portability pursuant to Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, including the right to receive all data in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format suitable for direct import by a provider of the wallet owner's choosing; (c) the right to erasure of data no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was collected, pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, exercisable without undue delay; (d) the right to revoke third-party access to their identification data at any time and with immediate effect; (e) in the event of the provider ceasing operations or entering insolvency proceedings, the right to retrieve and transfer all stored data as a matter of priority, such right ranking ahead of claims by the provider's creditors in respect of the data concerned, and exercisable without any additional formality. (f) where an insolvency administrator, liquidator or successor entity seeks to retain or transfer wallet owner data, other than personal data within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, for commercial purposes following the cessation of the provider's operations, the wallet owner shall have the right to withhold consent to such retention or transfer or, where consent is given, to receive fair compensation reflecting the economic value of the data concerned. No retention or transfer of wallet owner data for commercial purposes by any insolvency administrator, liquidator or successor entity shall be valid without the explicit prior written consent of the wallet owner. Where wallet owner data is included in a transfer of assets, the economic value attributable to that data shall be recognised as a distinct element of the consideration, and the wallet owner shall be entitled to a proportionate share of any amount paid specifically in respect of such data. Providers shall facilitate the exercise of all rights listed in this paragraph free of charge and without undue delay. Any contractual clause that restricts or conditions these rights shall be null and void. |
Or. en
Amendment 481
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, set out requirements for European Business Wallet owner identification data issued pursuant to this Article, including procedures for Member States to notify to the Commission the relevant authentic sources. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 7. The Commission shall by [9 months after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation], by means of implementing acts, set out requirements for European Business Wallet owner identification data issued pursuant to this Article, including procedures for Member States to notify to the Commission the relevant authentic sources. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 482
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where an economic operator has been attributed a European Unique Identifier, that identifier shall be used as the unique identifier referred to in Article 8(4), point (b) of this Regulation. | 1. Where an economic operator has been attributed a European Unique Identifier, that identifier shall be used as the unique identifier referred to in Article 8(5), point (b) of this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 483
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish specifications, requirements and procedures relating to the unique identifier referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, including measures to ensure that European Business Wallet owners are not attributed more than one unique identifier. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 4. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, and within the limits of the rules defined in this Regulation and its Annex, establish specifications, requirements and procedures relating to the unique identifier referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, including measures to ensure that European Business Wallet owners are not attributed more than one unique identifier and to prevent the duplication of existing identification data already held in national registers. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 484
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish specifications, requirements and procedures relating to the unique identifier referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, including measures to ensure that European Business Wallet owners are not attributed more than one unique identifier. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 4. The Commission shall, by means of an implementing act, establish specifications, requirements and procedures relating to the unique identifier referred to in paragraphs 2 and 4 of this Article, including measures to ensure that European Business Wallet owners are not attributed more than one unique identifier. Those implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19 and no later than 12 months after the entry into force of the Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 485
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish specifications, requirements and procedures relating to the unique identifier referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, including measures to ensure that European Business Wallet owners are not attributed more than one unique identifier. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 4. The Commission shall, by [6 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] by means of implementing acts, establish specifications, requirements and procedures relating to the unique identifier referred to in paragraph 2 and 3 of this Article, including measures to ensure that European Business Wallet owners are not attributed more than one unique identifier. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 486
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. The identifier framework established pursuant to this Article shall support the identification of subsidiaries, branches, establishments or other operational units of economic operators, where necessary for administrative procedures or digital transactions. It shall further enable natural persons engaged in economic activity to be associated with different identifiers corresponding to their distinct economic roles. |
Or. en
Amendment 487
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall establish, operate and maintain a European Digital Directory which shall act as the trusted source of information for European Business Wallet owners and shall take the form of a web application comprising of two interfaces: | 1. The Commission shall establish, operate and maintain a European Digital Directory hosted on secure and sovereign infrastructures within the Union. This Directory shall act strictly as the trusted source of information for European Business Wallet owners and shall take the form of a web application comprising of two interfaces: |
Or. en
Amendment 488
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) a secure, web-based platform that provides access to authenticated and authorised users and system online portal for European Business Wallet users. | (b) a secure, web-based platform that provides access to authenticated and authorised users through an online portal for European Business Wallet users. |
Or. en
Amendment 489
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The Commission shall ensure that the relevant information shall be included in the European Digital Directory. | 3. The Commission shall ensure that the information shall be included in the European Digital Directory. |
Or. en
Amendment 490
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10.º – paragraph 3 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. To ensure fulfilment of the obligations under Article 16, a public sector body that does not hold a European Business Wallet shall provide the Commission with the following information in order to be added to the European Digital Directory: | |
| (a) the official name of the public sector body; | |
| (b) the unique identifier referred to in Article 9; | |
| (c) the unique digital address or addresses referred to in Article 6(1), point a; | |
| (d) the country in which the public sector body is established. |
Or. pt
Amendment 491
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall make the European Digital Directory only accessible to European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives and providers of European Business Wallets. | 4. The European Digital Directory shall be accessible only to European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives, to notified providers, and to public sector bodies for the sole and documented purpose of verifying the identity of a specific economic operator in the context of an ongoing administrative or commercial procedure. The Commission, in its capacity as administrator of the Directory, shall not have access to individualised data relating to the transactions, commercial relationships or interactions between wallet owners, and shall process personal data contained in the Directory exclusively for the purposes of operating and maintaining the Directory, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. Each wallet owner shall be entitled, at any time and free of charge, to a complete log of all queries made to their data in the Directory during the preceding twelve months, including the identity of the querying entity and the stated purpose of the query. Wallet owners shall have the right to challenge any query that does not correspond to a documented legitimate purpose. |
Or. en
Amendment 492
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall make the European Digital Directory only accessible to European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives and providers of European Business Wallets. | 4. The Commission shall make the European Digital Directory only accessible to European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives and providers of European Business Wallets. The Commission shall ensure that its role in operating the Directory does not allow for any monitoring, collection, or analysis of the interactions or search patterns between users. |
Or. en
Amendment 493
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall make the European Digital Directory only accessible to European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives and providers of European Business Wallets. | 4. The Commission shall make the European Digital Directory accessible to European Business Wallet owners, their authorised users, providers of European Business Wallets, and relevant Member State authorities. |
Or. en
Amendment 494
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish standards and technical specifications for the unique digital addresses and the categories of information to be communicated to the Commission for the purpose of the European Digital Directory. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 6. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, and within the limits of this Regulation, establish standards and technical specifications for the unique digital addresses and the categories of information to be communicated to the Commission for the purpose of the European Digital Directory. These categories of information shall be strictly limited to what is necessary for identification and must primarily rely on existing data to avoid any additional administrative or financial burden for SMEs and small public sector bodies. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 495
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish standards and technical specifications for the unique digital addresses and the categories of information to be communicated to the Commission for the purpose of the European Digital Directory. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 6. The Commission shall, by [12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] by means of implementing acts, establish standards and technical specifications for the unique digital addresses and the categories of information to be communicated to the Commission for the purpose of the European Digital Directory. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 496
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish standards and technical specifications for the unique digital addresses and the categories of information to be communicated to the Commission for the purpose of the European Digital Directory. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 6. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19, establish standards and technical specifications for the unique digital addresses. The categories of information to be included in the European Digital Directory are limited by this Regulation to the following: |
Or. en
Amendment 497
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the unique digital address of the wallet owner; |
Or. en
Amendment 498
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the official name and unique identifier of the wallet owner; |
Or. en
Amendment 499
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the contact details designated by the wallet owner for the purpose of the Directory. The European Digital Directory shall not contain any information relating to the volume, frequency, subject-matter or content of individual transactions, communications or interactions of wallet owners. |
Or. en
Amendment 500
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Any expansion of the categories of information beyond those listed in this paragraph shall require an amendment to this Regulation adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure. |
Or. en
Amendment 501
Letizia Moratti, Massimiliano Salini, Fulvio Martusciello
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6 a. The requirements of this Regulation may be fulfilled, in whole or in part, through existing sectoral information systems based on data provided by economic operators and managed or intermediated by duly authorised or designated third parties, in compliance with applicable Union and national law. |
Or. en
Amendment 502
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11.º – paragraph 2 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) a declaration of conformity with the requirements of this Regulation. | (e) The risk assessment report referred to in paragraph 2(b) shall include: |
| (i) a description of the termination-of-service plans where a European Business Wallet provider ceases its activities, covering how information will be kept accessible; | |
| (ii) the policies and related measures for managing the risks associated with the provision of European Business Wallets, in accordance with Article 7; | |
| (iii) the policies and related measures implemented to address the risks identified in the risk assessment referred to in paragraph 2(a); |
Or. pt
Amendment 503
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e a) a detailed description of the cloud infrastructure and data storage locations, including a declaration of compliance with the requirement that all data and metadata are stored and processed exclusively within the Union and subject to Union law. |
Or. en
Amendment 504
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11.º – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. Entities shall perform a risk assessment covering the entirety of the European Business Wallet solution that they intend to provide, including the risks arising from their design, development, implementation, operation, maintenance, interoperability, dependencies and cessation of activity. |
Or. pt
Amendment 505
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11.º – paragraph 2 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2b. Entities shall demonstrate their compliance with the requirements in Articles 5, 6 and 7 and in the annex by means of a risk assessment report that shall be the product of a self-assessment of compliance with those requirements, including, where applicable, a self-assessment report supplied by third parties from which the applicant procures the services covered by Articles 5, 6 and 7 and by the annex and which the applicant does not provide directly, in accordance with the requirements applicable to them. |
Or. pt
Amendment 506
Paulo Cunha
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11.º – paragraph 2 c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2c. Where entities or a third party from which the entity procures the relevant qualified trust services already demonstrate compliance with the requirements for qualified trust services established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 corresponding to those listed in Articles 5, 6 and 7 of this regulation and the annex thereto, and have a valid conformity assessment report or certificate issued by a conformity assessment body pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, entities shall submit those conformity assessment reports or certificates as part of the risk assessment report. |
Or. pt
Amendment 507
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Qualified trust service providers shall not be subject to the review and verification procedure set out in paragraphs 4 to 6. Upon submitting the information listed in paragraph 2, the competent supervisory body shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(5) and it may immediately offer European Business Wallets. | 3. Upon submitting the information listed in paragraph 2, the competent supervisory body shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(5) and it may immediately offer European Business Wallets. |
Or. en
Amendment 508
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Qualified trust service providers shall not be subject to the review and verification procedure set out in paragraphs 4 to 6. Upon submitting the information listed in paragraph 2, the competent supervisory body shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(5) and it may immediately offer European Business Wallets. | 3. Qualified trust service providers shall not be subject to the review and verification procedure set out in paragraphs 4 to 6. Upon submitting the information listed in paragraph 2, the competent supervisory body shall inform the Commission within five working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3) and it may immediately offer European Business Wallets. |
Or. en
Amendment 509
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Upon receipt of a notification, the supervisory body shall have 30 days to review the information submitted. | Upon receipt of a notification, the supervisory body shall have 30 calendar days to review the information submitted. |
Or. en
Amendment 510
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) appears to correspond to the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), it shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(5). | When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation are met, it shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 511
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) appears to correspond to the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), it shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(5). | When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) appears to correspond to the requirements laid down in this Regulation, it shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 512
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is not complete or the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) appears not to correspond to the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), it shall request additional information or explanations from the notifying entity and set a reasonable deadline, not exceeding 15 calendar days, for response. If that information or those explanations allow the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) appears to correspond to the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), it shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(5). If not, or no response is received, the supervisory body shall inform the notifying entity that it will not be added to the list referred to in Article 12(5). | 5. When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is not complete or the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation are not met, it shall request additional information or explanations from the notifying entity and set a reasonable deadline, not exceeding 15 calendar days, for response. If that information or those explanations allow the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and that the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation are met, it shall inform the Commission within five working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3). If not, or no response is received, the supervisory body shall inform the notifying entity that it will not be added to the list referred to in Article 12(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 513
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is not complete or the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) appears not to correspond to the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), it shall request additional information or explanations from the notifying entity and set a reasonable deadline, not exceeding 15 calendar days, for response. If that information or those explanations allow the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) appears to correspond to the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), it shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(5). If not, or no response is received, the supervisory body shall inform the notifying entity that it will not be added to the list referred to in Article 12(5). | 5. When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is not complete or the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) appears not to correspond to the requirements laid down in this Regulation , it shall request additional information or explanations from the notifying entity and set a reasonable deadline, not exceeding 15 calendar days, for response. If that information or those explanations allow the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) appears to correspond to the requirements laid down in this Regulation, it shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3). If not, or no response is received, the supervisory body shall inform the notifying entity that it will not be added to the list referred to in Article 12(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 514
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Where the supervisory body has not provided the notifying entity with a substantive response on the outcome of the review referred to in paragraph 4 within 30 calendar days of receiving the notification, the information shall be considered as complete and the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) shall be considered as appearing to correspond to the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), and the supervisory body shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(5) | 6. Where the supervisory body has not provided the notifying entity with a substantive response on the outcome of the review referred to in paragraph 4 within 30 calendar days of receiving the notification, the supervisory body shall inform the notifying entity of the reason for the delay and shall complete the review within an additional 15 calendar days. When that review leads to the conclusion by the supervisory body that all information is complete and the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation are met, the shall Commission within two working days add that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 515
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Where the supervisory body has not provided the notifying entity with a substantive response on the outcome of the review referred to in paragraph 4 within 30 calendar days of receiving the notification, the information shall be considered as complete and the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) shall be considered as appearing to correspond to the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), and the supervisory body shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(5) | 6. Where the supervisory body has not provided the notifying entity with a response on the outcome of the review referred to in paragraph 4 within 30 calendar days of receiving the notification, the information shall be considered as complete and the description referred to in paragraph 2 point (c) shall be considered as appearing to correspond to the requirements laid down in this Regulation , and the supervisory body shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 516
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – the registration of a notified provider of European Business Wallets not previously present on the list referred to in paragraph 5; | – the registration of a notified provider of European Business Wallets not previously present on the list referred to in paragraph 3; |
Or. en
Amendment 517
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – a change to previously submitted information regarding providers of European Business Wallets currently present on the list referred to in paragraph 5; | – a change to previously submitted information regarding providers of European Business Wallets currently present on the list referred to in paragraph 3; |
Or. en
Amendment 518
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – a request to remove a provider of European Business Wallets from the list referred to in paragraph 5; | – a request to remove a provider of European Business Wallets from the list referred to in paragraph 3; |
Or. en
Amendment 519
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e a) a confirmation of the provider’s compliance with the data sovereignty and cloud localization requirements as set out in Article 7(2). |
Or. en
Amendment 520
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. On the basis of the information received pursuant to this Article, the Commission shall establish and maintain on the Commission’s website, in a machine-readable format, a list of providers of European Business Wallets. | 3. On the basis of the information received pursuant to this Article, the Commission shall establish and maintain on the Commission’s website, in a machine-readable format, a list of providers of European Business Wallets. The Commission shall act as a technical register and shall not have the power to refuse the inclusion of a provider duly notified by a competent supervisory body, provided the notification is complete an comply to all the requirements set out in this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 521
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. On the basis of the information received pursuant to this Article, the Commission shall establish and maintain on the Commission’s website, in a machine-readable format, a list of providers of European Business Wallets. | 3. On the basis of the information received pursuant to this Article, the Commission shall establish and maintain on the Commission’s website, in a machine-readable format, a list of providers of European Business Wallets, and shall update this list without undue delay. |
Or. en
Amendment 522
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In each Member State, the supervisory bodies designated pursuant to Article 46a of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 shall also be the supervisory bodies for the purposes of this Regulation. | 1. Member States shall lay down rules on effective governance and supervision with regard to providers of European Business Wallets. To that end, each Member State shall designate a supervisory body for the purposes of this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 523
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In each Member State, the supervisory bodies designated pursuant to Article 46a of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 shall also be the supervisory bodies for the purposes of this Regulation. | 1. Member States shall ensure effective governance and supervision of providers of European Business Wallets. To that end, they shall designate a supervisory body. |
Or. en
Amendment 524
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1 a. Member States shall notify the Commission of the names and addresses of the supervisory bodies appointed pursuant to paragraph 1, as well as of any subsequent change thereto. The Commission shall make available to the public a list of the notified supervisory bodies. |
Or. en
Amendment 525
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Member States shall ensure that the supervisory bodies referred to in paragraph 1 have the necessary powers and adequate resources for the exercise of their tasks in an effective, efficient and independent manner. | 3. Member States shall ensure that the supervisory bodies referred to in paragraph 1 have the necessary powers and adequate resources for the exercise of their tasks in an effective, efficient and independent manner. In exercising their tasks, supervisory bodies shall apply the principle of proportionality, particularly regarding small public sector bodies and local authorities, to ensure that administrative requirements do not exceed what is necessary to achieve the objectives of this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 526
Daniel Buda, Virgil-Daniel Popescu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Member States shall ensure that the supervisory bodies referred to in paragraph 1 have the necessary powers and adequate resources for the exercise of their tasks in an effective, efficient and independent manner. | 3. Member States shall ensure that the supervisory bodies referred to in paragraph 1 have the necessary powers, training and adequate resources for the exercise of their tasks in an effective, efficient, independent and timely manner and in accordance with the principles of equal treatment and proportionality. |
Or. ro
Amendment 527
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Member States shall ensure that the supervisory bodies referred to in paragraph 1 have the necessary powers and adequate resources for the exercise of their tasks in an effective, efficient and independent manner. | 3. Member States shall ensure that the supervisory bodies referred to in paragraph 1 have the necessary powers and adequate human and financial resources for the exercise of their tasks in an effective, efficient and independent manner. |
Or. ro
Amendment 528
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) inform the relevant competent authorities designated or established pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the Member States concerned of any significant security breach or loss of integrity of which it becomes aware in the performance of its tasks and, in the case of a significant security breach or loss of integrity which concerns other Member States, to inform the single point of contact designated or established pursuant to Article 8(3) Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the Member State concerned and the single points of contact designated pursuant to Article 46c(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 in the other Member States concerned, and to inform the public or require the provider of European Business Wallets to do so where the supervisory body determines that disclosure of the breach of security or loss of integrity would be in the public interest; | (f) inform the relevant competent authorities designated or established pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the Member States concerned of any significant incident which it becomes aware of in the performance of its tasks and, in the case of a significant incident which concerns other Member States, to inform the single point of contact designated or established pursuant to Article 8(3) Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the Member State concerned and the single points of contact designated pursuant to Article 46c(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 in the other Member States concerned, and to inform the public or require the provider of European Business Wallets to do so where the supervisory body determines that disclosure of the breach of security or loss of integrity would be in the public interest; |
Or. en
Amendment 529
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) report to the Commission on its main activities; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 530
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – point k
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (k) revoke the inclusion in the list established pursuant to Article 12(5) of a provider of European Business Wallets if the supervisory body determines that the provider no longer meets the requirements laid down in this Regulation or that the provider has failed to comply with the obligations imposed by this Regulation; | (k) notify the Commission if the supervisory body determines that a provider of European Business Wallets no longer meets the requirements laid down in this Regulation or that the provider has failed to comply with the obligations imposed by this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 531
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – point k
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (k) revoke the inclusion in the list established pursuant to Article 12(5) of a provider of European Business Wallets if the supervisory body determines that the provider no longer meets the requirements laid down in this Regulation or that the provider has failed to comply with the obligations imposed by this Regulation; | (k) revoke the inclusion in the list established pursuant to Article 12(3) of a provider of European Business Wallets if the supervisory body determines that the provider no longer meets the requirements laid down in this Regulation or that the provider has failed to comply with the obligations imposed by this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 532
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – point l a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (l a) ensure that the exercise of supervision does not undermine the ability of competent national authorities to request additional evidence or conduct further verifications in cases of justified suspicion of fraud, as referred to in Recital 23. |
Or. en
Amendment 533
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 10
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. In circumstances which justify an immediate intervention to preserve the proper functioning of the internal market and where the Commission has sufficient reason to consider that the European Business Wallets provided by a provider are non-compliant with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and no effective measures have been taken by the competent supervisory authority, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of compliance. The Commission shall inform the relevant authorities accordingly and the provider shall cooperate as necessary. | 10. In exceptional circumstances which justify an immediate intervention to preserve the proper functioning of the internal market and where the Commission has sufficient reason to consider that the European Business Wallets provided by a provider are non-compliant with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and no effective measures have been taken by the competent supervisory authority, and after formal notice to the Member State, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of compliance in close cooperation with the national supervisory authority. The Commission shall inform the relevant authorities accordingly and the provider shall cooperate as necessary. |
Or. en
Amendment 534
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 10
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. In circumstances which justify an immediate intervention to preserve the proper functioning of the internal market and where the Commission has sufficient reason to consider that the European Business Wallets provided by a provider are non-compliant with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and no effective measures have been taken by the competent supervisory authority, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of compliance. The Commission shall inform the relevant authorities accordingly and the provider shall cooperate as necessary. | 10. In circumstances which justify an immediate intervention to preserve the proper functioning of the internal market and where the Commission has sufficient and duly justified reasons supported by objective evidence of a providers systematic non-compliance with this Regulation and no effective measures have been taken by the competent supervisory authority, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of compliance. The Commission shall inform the relevant authorities accordingly and the provider shall cooperate as necessary. |
Or. en
Amendment 535
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. On the basis of the consultation, the Commission may adopt implementing acts to provide for corrective or restrictive measures, including temporarily suspending the provider from the list of notified providers or requiring the provider to take specific actions to bring the European Business Wallets into compliance with the Regulation. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure. | 12. On the basis of the consultation, the Commission may adopt implementing acts to provide for corrective or restrictive measures, including temporarily suspending the provider from the list of notified providers or requiring the provider to take specific actions to bring the European Business Wallets into compliance with the Regulation. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 536
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The European Digital Identity Cooperation Group established pursuant to Article 46e of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 shall be responsible for facilitating cooperation and information sharing among Member States and the Commission on matters related to the European Business Wallets. This shall include sharing best practices, discussing technical and operational issues, and coordinating efforts to ensure the proper implementation and functioning of the European Business Wallets. | The European Digital Identity Cooperation Group established pursuant to Article 46e of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 shall be responsible for facilitating cooperation and information sharing among Member States and the Commission on matters related to the European Business Wallets. This shall include sharing best practices, discussing technical and operational issues, and coordinating efforts to ensure the proper implementation and functioning of the European Business Wallets. The Group shall also specifically ensure full interoperability with the European Digital Identity Framework (eIDAS). |
Or. en
Amendment 537
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Governance and supervision of Union entities that are providers of European Business Wallets | Governance and supervision of Union entities that provide European Business Wallets to other Union entities |
Or. en
Amendment 538
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where a Union entity is a provider of European Business Wallets the Commission shall be its supervisory body. | 1. Where a Union entity is a provider of European Business Wallets the Commission shall be its supervisory body. In this case, the Commission shall ensure a strict functional and structural separation between the services providing the Wallet and the services performing the supervisory tasks. |
Or. en
Amendment 539
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where a Union entity is a provider of European Business Wallets the Commission shall be its supervisory body. | 1. Where a Union entity provides European Business Wallets to other Union entities the Commission shall be its supervisory body. |
Or. en
Amendment 540
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When acting as a supervisory body in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission shall perform the tasks referred to in Article 13(5) points a, b, c, d, h and k. | When acting as a supervisory body in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission shall perform the tasks referred to in Article 13(5) points a, b, c, d, h and k. In performing these tasks, the Commission shall not access, store, or analyse the content of data or the patterns of exchanges carried out through the European Business Wallets. |
Or. en
Amendment 541
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall prepare a report on its main activities in this respect. | The Commission shall, on a yearly basis, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on its activities in this respect. |
Or. en
Amendment 542
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By [Publications Office, please insert the date 24 months after the entry into force of this Regulation] public sector bodies shall enable economic operators to take the following actions by using the core functionalities of European Business Wallets as set out in Article 5(1): | By [Publications Office, please insert the date 18 months after the entry into force of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 5 and 6] public sector bodies shall enable economic operators to take the following actions by using the core functionalities of European Business Wallets as set out in Article 5(1): |
Or. en
Amendment 543
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By [Publications Office, please insert the date 24 months after the entry into force of this Regulation] public sector bodies shall enable economic operators to take the following actions by using the core functionalities of European Business Wallets as set out in Article 5(1): | By [Publications Office, please insert the date 24 months after the entry into force of this Regulation] all public sector bodies shall enable economic operators to take the following actions by using the core functionalities of European Business Wallets as set out in Article 5(1): |
Or. en
Amendment 544
Jüri Ratas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) identify and authenticate; | (a) present European Business Wallet owner identification data for authentication; |
Or. en
Amendment 545
Jüri Ratas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The actions listed in points (a) to (d) of the first subparagraph shall take place for the purpose of meeting a reporting obligation or fulfilling an administrative procedure. | The actions listed in points (a) to (d) of the first subparagraph shall take place for the purpose of meeting a reporting obligation or fulfilling an administrative procedure, where applicable. |
Or. en
Amendment 546
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Notwithstanding the first subparagraph, public sector bodies in central and regional governments, as well as in municipalities with 50,000 inhabitants or more shall enable economic operators to perform the actions listed in points (a) and (c) by [Publications Office] 12 months after entry into force] and (b) and (d) by 24 months after entry into force. |
Or. en
Amendment 547
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1 a. The obligation imposed on public sector bodies by this paragraph to enable the use of European Business Wallets shall not be construed as creating any obligation for private economic operators to use them. Public sector bodies shall ensure that, in parallel and on a permanent basis, at least one alternative legally compliant means of interaction remains available for each of the actions listed in points (a) to (d) of this paragraph, so that economic operators are not required to use a European Business Wallet to access public services, fulfil reporting obligations or exercise rights under Union or national law. |
Or. en
Amendment 548
Jüri Ratas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), public sector bodies shall have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 549
Morten Løkkegaard, Christophe Grudler, João Cotrim De Figueiredo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), public sector bodies shall have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). | 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), of this Article, public sector bodies shall have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). Public sector bodies may also make use of the European Business Wallets for the purposes referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) and (b) of this Article. |
Or. en
Amendment 550
Angelika Winzig, Lukas Mandl
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), public sector bodies shall have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). | 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), public sector bodies shall have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), or enable the respective use for economic operators in any other highly secure and interoperable way. |
Or. en
Amendment 551
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), public sector bodies shall have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). | 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), public sector bodies may have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). |
Or. en
Amendment 552
Jüri Ratas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and until [Publications Office, insert the date 36 months after entry into force of this Regulation], public sector bodies may choose not to offer the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), and support instead other existing alternative solutions which enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), provided those solutions: | deleted |
| (a) comply with the requirements applicable to qualified electronic registered delivery services set out in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014; | |
| (b) offer a gateway that enables European Business Wallet owners to submit documents and send and receive notifications using the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). |
Or. en
Amendment 553
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and until [Publications Office, insert the date 36 months after entry into force of this Regulation], public sector bodies may choose not to offer the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), and support instead other existing alternative solutions which enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), provided those solutions: | By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and until [Publications Office, insert the date 36 months after entry into force of this Regulation], public sector bodies may choose not to offer the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). The transition to the European Business Wallet shall not require the mandatory decommissioning of existing national or local digital systems that are already compliant with eIDAS, in order to protect previous public investments and ensure administrative continuity. Their alternative solution must support instead other existing alternative solutions which enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), provided those solutions: |
Or. en
Amendment 554
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and until [Publications Office, insert the date 36 months after entry into force of this Regulation], public sector bodies may choose not to offer the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), and support instead other existing alternative solutions which enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), provided those solutions: | By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and until [Publications Office, insert the date 30 months after entry into force of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 5 and 6], public sector bodies may choose not to offer the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), and support instead other existing alternative solutions which enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), provided those solutions: |
Or. en
Amendment 555
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and until [Publications Office, insert the date 36 months after entry into force of this Regulation], public sector bodies may choose not to offer the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), and support instead other existing alternative solutions which enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), provided those solutions: | By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and until [Publications Office, insert the date 24 months after entry into force of this Regulation], public sector bodies may choose not to offer the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), and support instead other existing alternative solutions which enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), provided those solutions: |
Or. en
Amendment 556
Jüri Ratas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) comply with the requirements applicable to qualified electronic registered delivery services set out in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 557
Jüri Ratas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) offer a gateway that enables European Business Wallet owners to submit documents and send and receive notifications using the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 558
Jüri Ratas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| After the expiry of the derogation period laid down in this paragraph, public sector bodies may continue to support the alternative solutions referred to in that subparagraph but shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 5(1), point (i). | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 559
Angelika Niebler
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| After the expiry of the derogation period laid down in this paragraph, public sector bodies may continue to support the alternative solutions referred to in that subparagraph but shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 5(1), point (i). | After the expiry of the derogation period laid down in this paragraph, public sector bodies may continue to support the alternative solutions referred to in that subparagraph but only as supplementary solution and shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 5(1), point (i). |
Or. en
Amendment 560
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| After the expiry of the derogation period laid down in this paragraph, public sector bodies may continue to support the alternative solutions referred to in that subparagraph but shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 5(1), point (i). | After the expiry of the derogation period laid down in this paragraph, public sector bodies may continue to support the alternative solutions referred to in that subparagraph but shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, also support European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 5(1), point (i). |
Or. en
Amendment 561
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation, for local public sector bodies with fewer than [X] inhabitants or limited administrative capacity, the deadline for compliance shall be extended accordingly to their capacity, and the Commission shall ensure that technical support is provided to prevent disproportionate financial burdens. |
Or. en
Amendment 562
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that business wallets or systems offering similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that such business wallets or systems are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 563
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that business wallets or systems offering similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that such business wallets or systems are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 1. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that business wallets or systems offering similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that such business wallets or systems are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014, comply with the data localization and sovereignty requirements set out in Article 7(2) of this Regulation, and provided that the third country offers reciprocal recognition to European Business Wallets, and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 564
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that business wallets or systems offering similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that such business wallets or systems are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 1. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that solutions offering an equivalent level of security and similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that such solutions are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 565
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that third country frameworks for systems offering similar functions as the European Business Wallets are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that the systems provided under that framework are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 2. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that third country frameworks for systems offering an equivalent level of security and similar functions as the European Business Wallets are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that the systems provided under that framework are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 566
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that third country frameworks for systems offering similar functions as the European Business Wallets are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that the systems provided under that framework are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. | 2. The Commission may adopt mutual recognition agreements establishing that third country frameworks for systems offering similar functions as the European Business Wallets are offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that the systems provided under that framework are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such agreements shall take the form of implementing acts and they shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19. |
Or. en
Amendment 567
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Prior to the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall assess whether the assurances can be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation. | 3. Prior to the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall carry out an assessment of the third-country solution, taking into account, at least, data protection standards, compliance with cybersecurity requirements and the independence of the third-country system and its providers from the control of high-risk governments, to assess whether the assurances can be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 568
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Prior to the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall assess whether the assurances can be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation. | 3. Prior to the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall assess whether the assurances can be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, including a mandatory audit of the third-country provider’s immunity from foreign extraterritorial laws that could compel the disclosure of business data or trade secrets. |
Or. en
Amendment 569
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Prior to the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall assess whether the assurances can be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation. | 3. Before the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall assess whether the guarantees can be considered equivalent to the requirements laid down in this Regulation. For the purposes of this assessment, no equivalence shall be recognised in respect of a third-country business wallet or similar system unless the Commission has verified that: |
Or. en
Amendment 570
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Prior to the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall assess whether the assurances can be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation. | 3. Prior to the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall assess whether the assurances can be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 571
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the categories of data that the system collects, processes or stores in connection with wallet owner identification do not exceed those that are strictly necessary for identification and communication purposes in accordance with the standard applicable under Article 8(5) of this Regulation, and that any directory or equivalent access layer does not collect categories of data beyond those permitted under Article 10(6) of this Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 572
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the system does not record, aggregate or process data relating to the volume, frequency, subject-matter or content of individual transactions or commercial interactions of wallet owners, whether directly or through inference from query logs or access patterns, except where strictly necessary for cybersecurity, service integrity, fraud prevention or technical maintenance, subject to data minimisation and prohibition of secondary use; |
Or. en
Amendment 573
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) where the third-country system includes a directory, query-based access layer or equivalent mechanism, wallet owners have a right functionally equivalent to that established in Article 10(4) of this Regulation to obtain a record of queries made to their identification data; |
Or. en
Amendment 574
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point d (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the third country does not require the provider to make wallet owner data available to its public authorities for purposes other than the prevention, investigation and prosecution of serious criminal offences, and subject to prior judicial authorisation or equivalent independent authorisation providing equivalent guarantees of necessity, proportionality and effective redress. |
Or. en
Amendment 575
Jorge Martín Frías
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Commission adopts an implementing act pursuant to paragraph 4 on the grounds that the guarantees of a recognised third-country system no longer satisfy the conditions set out in this paragraph, that act shall take effect immediately for new operations. Economic operators already using the third-country system at the date of revocation shall be granted a technical wind-down period of no more than ninety days solely for the purposes of data retrieval, portability and orderly cessation of existing operations, without prejudice to the immediate cessation of legal recognition for any new transaction or interaction. |
Or. en
Amendment 576
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall, where available information reveals that those assurances can no longer be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, to the extent necessary, repeal, amend or suspend the act referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 by means of an implementing act. | 4. The Commission shall, after the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, monitor that the third country solutions, systems or frameworks, continue to offer assurances that are equivalent. If a Member State identifies a risk regarding a third country system that has been recognised as equivalent under paragraph 1 or 2, or has substantiated reasons to believe that such a risk exists, it shall without undue delay provide a report and refer the matter to the Commission. Where available information reveals that those assurances can no longer be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, the Commission shall without undue delay and to the extent necessary, repeal, amend or suspend the act referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 by means of an implementing act. |
Or. en
Amendment 577
Morten Løkkegaard, Christophe Grudler, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Sophie Wilmès
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall, where available information reveals that those assurances can no longer be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, to the extent necessary, repeal, amend or suspend the act referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 by means of an implementing act. | 4. The Commission shall, after the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, monitor on an annual basis that the third country business wallets, systems or frameworks continue to offer assurances that are equivalent. If a Member State identifies a risk regarding a third country system that has been recognised as equivalent under paragraph 1 or 2, it shall provide a report and refer the matter to the Commission. Where the monitoring or other available information reveals that those assurances can no longer be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, to the extent necessary, repeal, amend or suspend the act referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 by means of an implementing act. |
Or. en
Amendment 578
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission shall, where available information reveals that those assurances can no longer be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, to the extent necessary, repeal, amend or suspend the act referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 by means of an implementing act. | 4. The Commission shall, where available information reveals that those assurances can no longer be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, without undue delay repeal, amend or suspend the act referred to in paragraph 1 by means of an implementing act. |
Or. en
Amendment 579
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall publish on its website a list of frameworks, business wallets or systems offering similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries in relation to which the Commission has adopted an implementing act pursuant to this Article. | 5. The Commission shall publish on its website a list of frameworks, business wallets or systems offering similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries in relation to which the Commission has adopted an implementing act pursuant to this Article. This list shall clearly indicate the specific legal basis for each equivalence and provide a summary of the assessment referred to in paragraph 3, including any potential legal risks identified regarding data protection and business confidentiality. |
Or. en
Amendment 580
Mélanie Disdier, Julie Rechagneux, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Providers of European Business Wallets may provide European Business Wallets to economic operators established in a third country under the condition that such economic operators have been issued European Business Wallet owner identification data and a unique identifier in accordance with this Article. | 1. Providers of European Business Wallets may provide European Business Wallets to economic operators established in a third country, under the conditions that such operators |
| (i) provide certified evidence of their legal existence and representation; | |
| (ii) undergo a verification process equivalent to the high assurance levels required within the Union; | |
| (iii) have been issued European Business Wallet owner identification data and a unique identifier in accordance with this Article. |
Or. en
Amendment 581
Morten Løkkegaard, Christophe Grudler, João Cotrim De Figueiredo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Providers of European Business Wallets may provide European Business Wallets to economic operators established in a third country under the condition that such economic operators have been issued European Business Wallet owner identification data and a unique identifier in accordance with this Article. | 1. Providers of European Business Wallets may provide European Business Wallets to economic operators established in a third country under the condition that such economic operators have been issued European Business Wallet owner identification data and a unique identifier in accordance with this Article, and, where available, have been identified with a Legal Entity Identifier. |
Or. en
Amendment 582
Rihards Kols, Francesco Torselli
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. 4a. Before issuing a European Business Wallet to an economic operator established outside the Union, providers shall carry out a risk-based assessment to identify whether the operator, its beneficial owners or entities exercising control over it: | |
| (a) are subject to Union restrictive measures in force; | |
| (b) have been designated under Union or national regimes for money-laundering, terrorist financing or serious organised crime; or | |
| (c) are engaged in activities that could seriously undermine the Union’s security, public order or strategic interests. | |
| Where such risks are identified and cannot be effectively mitigated, the provider shall refuse to issue the European Business Wallet and shall inform the competent supervisory body. |
Or. en
Justification
Establishes a specific, risk‑based screening obligation for third‑country economic operators before a European Business Wallet is issued. It ensures that access to the Wallet is consistent with existing Union policies on sanctions, anti‑money‑laundering and terrorist financing, and security, while still allowing proportionate, case‑by‑case assessments rather than automatic blanket exclusions.
Amendment 583
Morten Løkkegaard, Christophe Grudler, João Cotrim De Figueiredo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) where available, the economic operator has been identified with a Legal Entity Identifier. |
Or. en
Amendment 584
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Member States shall cooperate to ensure that providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data can verify that an economic operator established outside the Union has not yet been issued European Business Wallet owner identification data. | 6. Member States shall cooperate to ensure that providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data can verify that an economic operator established outside the Union has not yet been issued European Business Wallet owner identification data in another Member State. |
Or. ro
Amendment 585
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6 a. The Commission shall establish standards and technical specifications for issuing of European Business Wallet owner identification data, including unique identifiers, to economic operators established outside the Union as part of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(9) and 9(4). |
Or. en
Amendment 586
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (4) Paragraph 15 is replaced by the following: | (4) paragraph 15 is replaced by the following: |
Or. en
Amendment 587
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall review the application of this Regulation and shall, by [Publications Office, insert the date – 3 years after entry into force], submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall evaluate the effectiveness of the provisions of this Regulation with regard to facilitating the submission of electronic documents and electronic attestations to public sector bodies, by the usage of the European Business Wallets, as well as technological, market, and legal developments. The report shall also assess whether it is necessary to modify the scope of this Regulation or its specific provisions to set out an obligation for the use of the European Business Wallets to address the risks of legal fragmentation. | 1. The Commission shall review the application of this Regulation and shall, by [Publications Office, insert the date – 3 years after entry into force], submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall evaluate: |
Or. en
Amendment 588
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall review the application of this Regulation and shall, by [Publications Office, insert the date – 3 years after entry into force], submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall evaluate the effectiveness of the provisions of this Regulation with regard to facilitating the submission of electronic documents and electronic attestations to public sector bodies, by the usage of the European Business Wallets, as well as technological, market, and legal developments. The report shall also assess whether it is necessary to modify the scope of this Regulation or its specific provisions to set out an obligation for the use of the European Business Wallets to address the risks of legal fragmentation. | 1. The Commission shall review the application of this Regulation and shall, by [Publications Office, insert the date – 48 months after entry into force], submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall evaluate the effectiveness of the provisions of this Regulation with regard to facilitating the submission of electronic documents and electronic attestations to public sector bodies, by the usage of the European Business Wallets, as well as technological, market, and legal developments including, where available, information on time and cost savings, as well as uptake by all economic actors, notably small and medium-sized enterprises. The report shall also assess whether it is necessary to modify the scope of this Regulation or its specific provisions to set out an obligation for the use of the European Business Wallets to address the risks of legal fragmentation. |
Or. en
Amendment 589
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the degree to which European Business Wallets have reduced the administrative burden on economic operators in their interactions with public sector bodies, with specific attention to time and cost savings and to the operation of the once-only principle as an individually enforceable right; |
Or. en
Amendment 590
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) whether the voluntary nature of European Business Wallets has been effectively guaranteed in practice, including whether any indirect pressures, incentive structures or national implementing measures have in effect rendered their use obligatory or disadvantageous to avoid; |
Or. en
Amendment 591
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) whether alternative means of interaction have remained available and accessible to economic operators that have chosen not to use a European Business Wallet; |
Or. en
Amendment 592
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point d (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the uptake of European Business Wallets in business-to-business contexts and any legal or practical barriers to such uptake; |
Or. en
Amendment 593
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point e (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) the compliance of the European Digital Directory with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, including the findings of all data protection impact assessments carried out. |
Or. en
Amendment 594
Jorge Martín Frías, Mélanie Disdier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall not propose, on the basis of this review, any amendment that would make the use of European Business Wallets obligatory for private economic operators, in whole or in part, or that would remove or restrict the right of private economic operators to interact with public sector bodies or with other economic operators through legally compliant means other than European Business Wallets. The voluntary nature of European Business Wallets for private economic operators is a fundamental principle of this Regulation and shall not be subject to modification through the review mechanism established by this Article. |
Or. en
Amendment 595
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d a) the level of uptake by economic operators and businesses, disaggregated by size category and sector where relevant; |
Or. en
Amendment 596
Morten Løkkegaard, Christophe Grudler, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Sophie Wilmès
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) (f) the financial, administrative or other possible impact on economic operators, specifically small and medium sizes enterprises, including micro enterprises and start-ups, sole traders and self-employed persons. |
Or. en
Amendment 597
Morten Løkkegaard, Christophe Grudler, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Sophie Wilmès
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2 a. (e) the level of uptake by economic operators of the European Business Wallets: |
Or. en
Amendment 598
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| It shall apply from [Publications Office, insert the date – 1 year after entry into force]. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 599
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1) a notified electronic identification (eID) means in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, fulfilling at least the requirements for a substantial level of assurance as defined in Article 8 of that Regulation and further specified in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502; or | (1) a notified electronic identification (eID) means in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, fulfilling at least the requirements for a high level of assurance as defined in Article 8 of that Regulation and further specified in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502; or |
Or. en
Amendment 600
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (2) an alternative authentication mechanism recognised as equivalent and fulfilling at least the requirements for a substantial level of assurance as defined in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and further specified in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502. | (2) an alternative authentication mechanism recognised as equivalent and fulfilling at least the requirements for a high level of assurance as defined in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and further specified in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502. |
Or. en
Amendment 601
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3) Where critical assets relate to performing electronic identification at assurance level substantial, the European Business Wallets cryptographic operations or other operations processing critical assets shall be performed in accordance with the requirements for the characteristics and design of electronic identification means at assurance level substantial, as set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502. | (3) Where critical assets relate to performing electronic identification at assurance level high, the European Business Wallets cryptographic operations or other operations processing critical assets shall be performed in accordance with the requirements for the characteristics and design of electronic identification means at assurance level high, as set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502. |
Or. en
Amendment 602
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) where they authenticate the European Business Wallet owner in the context of performing electronic identification at assurance level substantial as set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502; | (b) where they authenticate the European Business Wallet owner in the context of performing electronic identification at assurance level high as set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502; |
Or. en
Amendment 603
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 1 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) comply with the requirements for the characteristics and design of electronic identification means at assurance level substantial, as set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502. | (g) comply with the requirements for the characteristics and design of electronic identification means at assurance level high, as set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502. |
Or. en
Amendment 604
Eero Heinäluoma
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1) In line with Article 5 of this Regulation, Business Wallets shall integrate and support the use of a specific qualified electronic registered delivery service in accordance with Articles 43 and 44 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. | (1) In line with Article 5 of this Regulation, Business Wallets shall integrate and support the use of qualified electronic registered delivery services, which comply with the technical and interoperability requirements established pursuant to subpoint 2, in accordance with Articles 43 and 44 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. |
Or. en
Amendment 605
Eero Heinäluoma
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) designate one qualified electronic registered delivery service that shall serve as the mandatory secure legal communication channel for European Business Wallets; | (a) establish a common set of technical and operational requirements, including a standardised interface, for qualified electronic registered delivery services to be used as a secure legal communication channel for European Business Wallets; |
Or. en
Amendment 606
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) designate one qualified electronic registered delivery service that shall serve as the mandatory secure legal communication channel for European Business Wallets; | (a) designate a common set of technical and operational requirements for qualified electronic registered delivery service that shall serve as mandatory secure legal communication channels for European Business Wallets; |
Or. en
Amendment 607
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) define the minimum technical and interoperability requirements that such qualified electronic registered delivery service must fulfil, including alignment with the reference standards, specifications and procedures established under Articles 43 and 44 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014; | (b) define the minimum technical and interoperability requirements that such qualified electronic registered delivery services must fulfil, including alignment with the reference standards, specifications and procedures established under Articles 43 and 44 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014; |
Or. en
Amendment 608
Eero Heinäluoma
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) ensure that the chosen qualified electronic registered delivery service is based on open, publicly available and royalty-free standards to guarantee interoperability and prevent vendor lock-in; | (c) ensure that the qualified electronic registered delivery services referred to in subpoint 1 are based on open, publicly available and royalty-free standards to guarantee interoperability and prevent vendor lock-in; |
Or. en
Amendment 609
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) ensure that the chosen qualified electronic registered delivery service is based on open, publicly available and royalty-free standards to guarantee interoperability and prevent vendor lock-in; | (c) ensure that the chosen qualified electronic registered delivery service are based on open, publicly available and royalty-free standards to guarantee interoperability and prevent vendor lock-in; |
Or. en
Amendment 610
Eero Heinäluoma
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) ensure that the chosen qualified electronic registered delivery service provides end-to-end encryption to guarantee confidentiality; | (d) ensure that the qualified electronic registered delivery services referred to in subpoint 1 provide end-to-end encryption to guarantee confidentiality; |
Or. en
Amendment 611
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) ensure that the chosen qualified electronic registered delivery service provides end-to-end encryption to guarantee confidentiality; | (d) ensure that the chosen qualified electronic registered delivery services provide end-to-end encryption to guarantee confidentiality; |
Or. en
Amendment 612
Eero Heinäluoma
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3) Interoperability between Business Wallets and the designated qualified electronic registered delivery service shall be mandatory. Providers of Business Wallets shall ensure technical integration in accordance with the implementing acts referred to in subpoint 2. | (3) Interoperability between Business Wallets and the qualified electronic registered delivery services referred to in subpoint 1 shall be mandatory. Providers of Business Wallets shall ensure technical integration in accordance with the implementing acts referred to in subpoint 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 613
Marion Walsmann, Hildegard Bentele, Jens Gieseke, Stefan Berger, Tomáš Zdechovský, Norbert Lins, Christian Doleschal, Angelika Niebler, Alexandra Mehnert, Matej Tonin
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3) Interoperability between Business Wallets and the designated qualified electronic registered delivery service shall be mandatory. Providers of Business Wallets shall ensure technical integration in accordance with the implementing acts referred to in subpoint 2. | (3) Interoperability between Business Wallets and the designated qualified electronic registered delivery services shall be mandatory. Providers of Business Wallets shall ensure technical integration in accordance with the implementing acts referred to in subpoint 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 614
Damian Boeselager
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) Wallet solutions shall support mechanisms that enable providers of Business Wallets Owner Identification Data to verify issuance, delivery and activation in compliance with assurance level substantial requirements set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502 (11); | (c) Wallet solutions shall support mechanisms that enable providers of Business Wallets Owner Identification Data to verify issuance, delivery and activation in compliance with assurance level high requirements set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502 (11); |
Or. en