Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

amendment list, 20 April 2026

Research and training programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for the period 2028-2032, complementing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, and providing for the Community’s contribution to the ITER project

Document ITRE-AM-787718 · (COM(2025)0594 – 2025/0594(NLE))

Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

Full text

Jump to an amendment (289)
Text 1,772 paragraphs

Amendment 26

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1) The European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Community’) aims to raise the living standards in the Member States by promoting and facilitating nuclear research, complementing it with Community research and training programmes.(1) The European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Community’) aims to raise the living standards in the Member States by promoting and facilitating nuclear research, complementing it with Community research and training programmes. The new programme for 2028–2032 aims to enlarge the scope of supported research and innovation projects under the Euratom Programme by broadening funded activities beyond safety, decommissioning and waste management, in order to strengthen technological capacity, skills and industrial innovation across the nuclear sector. The Community shall ensure that relevant research, innovation and skills policies reflect a technology-neutral approach. The Commission should support these developments through coordinated research, innovation, skills and infrastructure policies across the Union, covering both existing and next-generation nuclear technologies, including nuclear fission energy technologies and nuclear fuel cycle technologies, with a view to building a competitive European technological supply chain, ensuring strategic autonomy and preserving advanced industrial and scientific capacities. The programme should also support non-power applications. In this context, the Euratom Research and Training Programme should broaden its scope to include all radiation applications, with particular emphasis on medical uses. Non-power nuclear applications, in particular the use of ionising radiation to support safe and optimised medical procedures, contribute to Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan.
Among the research priorities, the programme shall include:

Or. en

Amendment 27

Tomas Tobé, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1) The European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Community’) aims to raise the living standards in the Member States by promoting and facilitating nuclear research, complementing it with Community research and training programmes.(1) The European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Community’) aims to raise the living standards in the Member States by promoting and facilitating nuclear research, complementing it with Community research and training programmes, and by facilitating investment in the development of nuclear energy.

Or. en

Read the rest (1,760 paragraphs)

Amendment 28

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 a) Nuclear energy constitutes a structural pillar of Europe's energy security and industrial competitiveness. As a dispatchable, baseload source of reliable, stable and affordable electricity, it ensures the continuous and predictable energy supply on which energy-intensive industries, research institutions and public services depend. Its importance extends beyond electricity generation to medical radioisotope production, radiation technology and fundamental scientific research, making the European nuclear sector an irreplaceable component of the Union's strategic and technological sovereignty.

Or. en

Amendment 29

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 a) Nuclear energy generated electricity in 12 of the 27 Member States in 2023 and provided 22.8% of Europe's electricity and half of its low-carbon electricity. Beyond electricity generation, nuclear technologies provide essential solutions in healthcare, where over 10 million patients across the Union benefit from nuclear medicines annually, as well as in industry, space and environmental monitoring. The Programme should reflect the strategic importance of nuclear science and technology for the Union's prosperity, security and public health.

Or. en

Amendment 30

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 a) Nuclear fission sector: the programme shall support research enabling lifetime extension, long-term operation, safety, security and industrial development across the nuclear fission sector, including both existing and next-generation fission technologies;

Or. en

Amendment 31

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 b) Nuclear fusion sector: the programme shall support research and innovation aimed at accelerating the transition from the achievement of fusion energy gain to the commercial deployment of fusion energy, including through coordinated support for demonstration projects, enabling infrastructures, industrial partnerships and regulatory preparedness across the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 32

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 c) SMRs and AMRs: the programme shall support research and innovation for the development and deployment of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), with a view to strengthening European industrial capacity, fostering innovation and contributing to a secure and low-carbon energy supply. It shall support the development of European SMR and AMR value chains, in line with the objectives of the European Industrial Alliance on SMRs, and encourage the identification of additional research needs related to these technologies.

Or. en

Amendment 33

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 d) Enabling technologies: the programme shall support research and development addressing generic and cross-cutting industrial challenges in key enabling technologies, such as robotics, automation, circular economy, energy storage and cybersecurity, including in projects involving the nuclear sector where relevant, in order to foster transversal innovation and strengthen European industrial competitiveness.

Or. en

Amendment 34

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 e (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 e) Digitalisation: the programme shall support the European nuclear sector in its digital transformation, including through the development and implementation of standardised interfaces for data exchange and interoperability solutions, the promotion of secure data sharing between undertakings, the establishment of a trusted digital ecosystem and the strengthening of the sector’s resilience to cyber risks.

Or. en

Amendment 35

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 f (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 f) Safety and security: the programme shall support research and innovation in nuclear technologies while ensuring that the highest standards of nuclear safety, security, safeguards, security of supply and radiation protection are maintained and continuously strengthened across the Union. It shall prioritise research on the safe long-term operation of existing nuclear installations, including through the integration of advanced materials, additive manufacturing, digitalisation and inspection technologies, as well as on ageing management, safety assessment methodologies and regulatory oversight, in light of the increasing number of lifetime-extension decisions across the Union. The programme shall also support research on innovative fuels, fuel cycle sovereignty, waste management and geological disposal, with a view to ensuring the safe and sustainable development of the nuclear sector. Actions in the field of radiation protection shall be continued and reinforced, including through the long-term continuity of relevant partnerships and enhanced cooperation with national competent authorities and scientific communities.

Or. en

Amendment 36

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 g (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 g) Security of supply: the programme shall support projects aimed at reducing strategic dependencies on nuclear fuel and raw materials, including through the responsible use of the full potential of European material stockpiles, with a view to reinforcing security of supply and strategic autonomy. It shall also address vulnerabilities related to dependencies on limited external suppliers, including in the field of stable isotopes for radiopharmaceutical supply chains, by supporting the development of European production capacities, the diversification of supply sources, and the strengthening of associated infrastructures and skills.

Or. en

Amendment 37

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 h (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 h) Metrology services: the programme shall support the provision of high-quality metrology services and radiation protection activities across the Union, including through the consistent application by Member States of harmonised metrology-based quality assurance procedures, in order to ensure comparability of measurements, reliability of assessments and a high and equivalent level of protection for all citizens. It shall promote strengthened cooperation in metrology at European level, including advances in technical developments and the harmonisation of strategies, with a view to ensuring consistent measurement standards, mutual trust between national systems and high standards of safety and radiation protection. The programme shall also support research on optimal measurement protocols in nuclear medicine and radiotherapy, including the development of standardised metrics for imaging and therapy, as well as improved measurement techniques, dose estimation methodologies and validation tools, in order to enhance risk assessment, reduce radiation exposure and improve the quality and safety of care.

Or. en

Amendment 38

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 i (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 i) Non-power applications: nuclear medicine and radiation protection: the programme shall support research and innovation in non-power applications of nuclear technologies, including the use of ionising radiation to support safe and optimised medical procedures and to advance diagnosis and treatment of diseases. It shall ensure that the Euratom Programme reflects the full breadth of radiation applications, with particular emphasis on medical uses, including nuclear medicine, radiobiology and clinical translation, and shall promote the effective deployment of research outcomes within healthcare systems, including through enhanced technology transfer. The programme shall support the development of innovative applications of ionising radiation, including medical radionuclides, and strengthen research in radiation protection, emergency preparedness and response to radiological or nuclear incidents. It shall also contribute to the sustainable production of radionuclides, including, where appropriate, alternatives to fission-produced isotopes, and to the resilience of European supply chains for radiopharmaceuticals and related technologies. It shall promote synergies with relevant Union programmes and initiatives, as well as cooperation between health and nuclear authorities, including improved coordination of regulatory frameworks for radiopharmaceuticals. The programme shall further support the digitalisation of medical applications of ionising radiation, including interoperable data systems, standardised formats and the development of advanced analytical tools, with a view to enhancing radiation protection and improving the quality and safety of care.

Or. en

Amendment 39

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 j (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1 j) Research infrastructures: the programme shall support access to Union funding for nuclear research and technology infrastructures, as well as demonstrators, across the Union, with a view to strengthening scientific excellence, skills development, industrial capacity and coordinated European investment in strategic facilities. It shall also promote the mutualisation of infrastructures and resources, in order to enhance coordination, achieve economies of scale and optimise the use of existing capacities across the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 40

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security and environmental sustainability. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit.(2) In a context of growing geopolitical instability, the Union faces the dual challenge of ensuring strategic autonomy and securing the supply of affordable, reliable and low-carbon energy, while preserving its industrial base and technological leadership. Energy autonomy is essential for the Union, and nuclear energy constitutes an important component of a diversified low-carbon energy mix. Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security, environmental sustainability, industrial competitiveness and scientific leadership. The role of nuclear energy should be assessed on the basis of its full life-cycle costs, including its contribution to the provision of low-carbon dispatchable electricity and to the preservation of advanced industrial and scientific capacities across the Union. In the absence of sufficient and coordinated support, the Union risks falling behind global competitors, particularly in the development and deployment of SMR and AMR technologies, and further losing industrial competitiveness in reactor construction. However, the nuclear sector continues to suffer from a perception of limited innovation capacity, which may affect its attractiveness and investment dynamics. It is therefore necessary to reinforce European manufacturing capacities and support the sector in line with the objectives of Regulation (EU) 2024/1735, with a view to sustaining technological leadership and strengthening the Union’s strategic autonomy.

Or. en

Amendment 41

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security and environmental sustainability. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit.(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security and environmental sustainability and plays a key role in the development of innovative solutions to current global challenges. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit. In the medical field, advanced imaging and radiotherapy techniques facilitate the early diagnosis and effective treatment of serious diseases such as cancer. In the industrial field, the use of radiation enables materials testing and the optimisation of production processes, hence increasing safety and efficiency. In agriculture, nuclear technologies support the creation of crops that are more resistant to pests and extreme climatic conditions, thereby contributing to food security. As regards environmental protection, nuclear research furnishes precise methods for monitoring pollution and managing natural resources. Last but not least, in the field of security, these technologies help detect hazardous materials and to prevent threats. Continued investment in nuclear research is therefore key to the advancement of society, as such research has a significant positive impact on the quality of life and sustainable development globally.

Or. ro

Justification

Nuclear research plays a vital role in developing innovative solutions to today’s global challenges, and continued investment in this area is key to the advancement of society as such research has a significant positive impact on the quality of life.

Amendment 42

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security and environmental sustainability. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit.(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security, high levels of health protection and environmental sustainability. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit. Such research should be pursued in a manner that upholds the public interest, ensures a high level of protection for workers, the public and the environment, promotes a strong radiation protection culture, and supports quality employment and skills development across the research and innovation chain.

Or. en

Amendment 43

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security and environmental sustainability. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit.(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to nuclear safety and radiation protection.

Or. en

Amendment 44

Virgil-Daniel Popescu

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security and environmental sustainability. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit.(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security and environmental sustainability and requires the mobilisation of all available Union and Member State funding sources, including public and private financing, including for energy generation capacities. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit.

Or. en

Amendment 45

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2) Research in the nuclear field contributes to social well-being, economic prosperity, security and environmental sustainability. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit.(2) Research, innovation, and development in the nuclear field contribute to social well-being, economic prosperity, security and environmental sustainability. Research on the applications of ionising radiation has led to improvements in medical, industrial, agricultural, environmental and security technologies from which many benefit.

Or. en

Amendment 46

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2 a) Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs) are emerging as promising technologies for decarbonisation and energy system flexibility, with potential applications including electricity generation, grid stability, industrial heat, district heating and cooling, hydrogen production and water desalination. Their modular design offers advantages in terms of safety, flexibility, manufacturability, scalability and cost efficiency.

Or. en

Amendment 47

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2 a) Nuclear energy is a low-carbon, dispatchable energy source providing a significant share of Europe's clean electricity, and indispensable to the Union's competitiveness, energy security, and grid stability, especially in an increasingly volatile geopolitical environment.

Or. en

Amendment 48

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2 b) With a growing number of Member States opting to extend the operation of existing nuclear reactors and/or construct new facilities, demand for resources and specialised skills is expected to increase significantly, with recruitment needs estimated at around 450 positions over the next decade, including approximately 150 specialists in nuclear sciences. The International Energy Agency considers the lifetime extension of existing nuclear reactors to be among the most cost-effective options for delivering low-carbon electricity, thereby contributing to decarbonisation objectives while limiting system costs.

Or. en

Amendment 49

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2 c) The International Energy Agency considers the lifetime extension of existing nuclear reactors to be among the most cost-effective options for delivering low-carbon electricity, thereby contributing to decarbonisation objectives while limiting system costs. In this context, the lifetime extension of nuclear reactors planned by several Member States creates additional research needs in nuclear safety, requiring stable and predictable funding under the Euratom fission programme, in particular with regard to long-term operation (LTO), ageing management and safety assessment methodologies.

Or. en

Amendment 50

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research in the nuclear field at the Community level, it is necessary to establish a Community research and training programme (the ‘Programme’) and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’) limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework2 .(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research in the nuclear field at the Community level, it is necessary to establish a Community research and training programme (the ‘Programme’) and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’) limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework. Nuclear energy plays a complementary role alongside renewable energy sources in achieving the Union’s climate neutrality objectives.
2 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/NNN of DD MMMM 2025 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034 (OJ L NNN, DD.MM.YYYY, p. N, ELI: ).

Or. en

Amendment 51

Georgiana Teodorescu

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research in the nuclear field at the Community level, it is necessary to establish a Community research and training programme (the ‘Programme’) and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’) limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework2 .(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research in the nuclear field at the Community level and accelerate its technology development, engineering, demonstration and deployment, it is necessary to establish a Community research and training programme (the ‘Programme’) and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’) limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework2 .
2 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/NNN of DD MMMM 2025 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034 (OJ L NNN, DD.MM.YYYY, p. N, ELI: ).2 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/NNN of DD MMMM 2025 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034 (OJ L NNN, DD.MM.YYYY, p. N, ELI: ).

Or. en

Justification

Given nuclear's recognition as a key clean technology to ensure energy sovereignty in Europe, Euratom should support, beyond research on safety, research on innovative nuclear fission solutions, from concept to deployment.

Amendment 52

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research in the nuclear field at the Community level, it is necessary to establish a Community research and training programme (the ‘Programme’) and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’) limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework2 .(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research and innovation in the nuclear field at the Community level, it is necessary to establish a Community research and training programme (the ‘Programme’) and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’) limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework2 .
2 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/NNN of DD MMMM 2025 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034 (OJ L NNN, DD.MM.YYYY, p. N, ELI: ).2 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/NNN of DD MMMM 2025 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034 (OJ L NNN, DD.MM.YYYY, p. N, ELI: ).

Or. en

Amendment 53

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research in the nuclear field at the Community level, it is necessary to establish a Community research and training programme (the ‘Programme’) and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’) limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework2 .(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research in the nuclear field at the Community level, it is necessary to establish a Community research, innovation and training programme (the ‘Programme’) and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’) limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework2 .
2 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/NNN of DD MMMM 2025 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034 (OJ L NNN, DD.MM.YYYY, p. N, ELI: ).2 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/NNN of DD MMMM 2025 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034 (OJ L NNN, DD.MM.YYYY, p. N, ELI: ).

Or. en

Amendment 54

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research in the nuclear field at the Community level, it is necessary to establish a Community research and training programme (the ‘Programme’) and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’) limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework2 .(3) In order to ensure the continuity of research and innovation in the nuclear field at the Community level, it is necessary to establish a Community research, innovation and training programme (the 'Programme') and, as the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the 'Euratom Treaty') limits the length of its research and training programmes to 5 years, the Programme should cover the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032. The Commission would present a new proposal to implement the remaining budget of the last 2 years of the 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework.
2 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/NNN of DD MMMM 2025 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034 (OJ L NNN, DD.MM.YYYY, p. N, ELI: ).

Or. en

Amendment 55

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy.(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy. Stronger synergies between the Euratom Programme and Horizon Europe in education, training and knowledge-dissemination activities will help maintain strategic nuclear skills, build capacity across Member States and promote Union expertise in the nuclear field. Synergies between the two programmes should be operationalised through coordinated programming of research objectives across the full innovation chain and through combined and cumulative funding mechanisms, enabling cross-cutting projects, including those involving both nuclear and non-strictly nuclear activities, while ensuring legal clarity, simple procedures and predictable implementation. In this context, the development of initiatives such as the proposed ‘Moonshot Fusion’ under Horizon Europe is welcomed, and the Commission should ensure coherent links with Euratom, industrial stakeholders and relevant research infrastructures in order to accelerate progress towards commercially viable fusion energy. The Commission should also ensure stronger support within Horizon Europe for non-energy applications of nuclear science and technology, including medical applications, in order to advance diagnosis, treatment and innovation for the benefit of Union citizens.
3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]
4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]

Or. en

Amendment 56

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy.(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy. Such coordination should support the Union’s open strategic autonomy, resilient industrial base, high social and environmental standards and long-term public investment capacity.
3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]
4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]

Or. en

Amendment 57

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy.(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the 'ECF') established by Regulation [establishing the ECF] and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 ('Horizon Europe') established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme] by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union's economy, competitiveness and investment strategy, in line with the objective of strengthening European technological sovereignty in nuclear science and of reinforcing European industrial leadership.
3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]
4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]

Or. en

Amendment 58

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy.(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union's economy, competitiveness and investment strategy, in line with the objective of strengthening European industrial sovereignty.
3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]
4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]

Or. en

Amendment 59

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy.(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by pursuing nuclear research and training activities to improve nuclear safety, security and radiation protection.
3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]
4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]

Or. en

Amendment 60

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy.(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s competitiveness, economy and investment strategy.
3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]
4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]

Or. en

Amendment 61

Georgiana Teodorescu

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research and innovation at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy.(4) The Programme should be tightly connected with the European Competitiveness Fund (the ‘ECF’) established by Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 and Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034 (‘Horizon Europe’) established by Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 by placing research, innovation and deployment at the heart of the Union’s economy and investment strategy.
3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]3 Regulation [establishing the ECF]
4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]4 Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme]

Or. en

Justification

Given nuclear's recognition as a key clean technology to ensure energy sovereignty in Europe, Euratom should support, beyond research on safety, research on innovative nuclear fission solutions, from concept to deployment.

Amendment 62

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4 a) Pillar I: nuclear topics should be eligible under all MSCA instruments. The programme shall promote strengthened synergies between the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) and the European Research Council (ERC) in support of fundamental nuclear research, including on fuel-cycle circularity, lifetime extension of reactors, optimisation of fission systems and innovative fuels. It shall support the expansion of MSCA fellowships, including increased opportunities for doctoral candidates, in order to strengthen early-stage training, address skills shortages and reinforce the Union’s long-term research and innovation capacity, while ensuring that nuclear topics are eligible across all MSCA schemes. The Commission should also ensure openness of other Union instruments, including the European Innovation Council, to support start-ups and breakthrough innovation in nuclear technologies, while ensuring complementarity with the Euratom Programme and clear eligibility and evaluation criteria;

Or. en

Amendment 63

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4 b) Pillar II: calls for the inclusion of nuclear research within collaborative research actions, extending eligibility across all relevant policy windows and strengthening support for public undertakings, private companies and start-ups in the nuclear sector, while reinforcing links between fundamental research, cross-cutting industrial process innovation and deployment-oriented activities, in order to foster closer collaboration between research institutions, fusion start-ups and large industrial companies, and to ensure effective knowledge transfer enabling industry to benefit from publicly funded research and accelerating the development and commercialisation of fusion technologies;

Or. en

Amendment 64

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4 c) Pillar III: the programme shall foster enhanced coordination with the European Innovation Council (EIC) to support emerging applications, including Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs) and reactor miniaturisation, as well as to strengthen collaborative research within relevant policy windows, notably in the fields of health and energy and decarbonisation. It shall support non-electric applications of nuclear science and technology, in particular in the medical field, including the development of medical radioisotopes, with a view to ensuring coherent support across Union programmes and maximising benefits for citizens. Support should also extend to other sectors, including agriculture, industry, space and maritime applications, and be ensured through a broad range of Union instruments, rather than relying solely on the Euratom Research and Training Programme at constant budget. The programme shall also support the development and deployment of innovative nuclear fuels required for Advanced Modular Reactors, and promote support for AMR-related activities under Horizon Europe where they are not strictly nuclear in nature.

Or. en

Amendment 65

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5) The Union should, furthermore, aim to eliminate inequalities and to promote equality between men and women, as well as to combat discrimination in accordance with Article 8 and Article 10 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 66

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5) The Union should, furthermore, aim to eliminate inequalities and to promote equality between men and women, as well as to combat discrimination in accordance with Article 8 and Article 10 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 67

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5) The Union should, furthermore, aim to eliminate inequalities and to promote equality between men and women, as well as to combat discrimination in accordance with Article 8 and Article 10 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.(5) The Union should, furthermore, aim to eliminate inequalities and to promote equality between men and women, as well as to combat discrimination in accordance with Article 8 and Article 10 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. To that end, all Union policies and programmes should be designed and implemented in such a way as to integrate an equal opportunities perspective, ensuring equal access to resources, education and employment, including in managerial positions, and social and political participation. Furthermore, concrete measures need to be taken to prevent and combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability or age.

Or. ro

Justification

Eliminating inequalities and promoting equality between women and men is also important in the field of research, especially as regards women’s leadership in that field.

Amendment 68

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5 a) Nuclear energy, including small modular reactors and Generation IV technologies, constitutes a strategic asset for ensuring security of energy supply, industrial competitiveness and decarbonisation within the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 69

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and Union programmes can be of greater benefit to Union citizens than having actions under the Programme alone. For this reason, the Programme should seek synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes.(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and other Union programmes can deliver greater benefits to Union citizens than actions under the Programme alone. Nuclear research and innovation projects should not be financed exclusively under the Euratom Programme but should, where appropriate, have access to complementary Union funding instruments, including Horizon Europe and future Framework Programmes, the European Competitiveness Fund and relevant industrial initiatives, in order to strengthen synergies across policy areas, ensure adequate investment along the full research-to-deployment continuum and support the Union’s objectives in decarbonisation, energy security and technological sovereignty. To that end, the Programme shall seek synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes, including through the possibility of combined funding, while ensuring that, in line with the principle of technology neutrality, Union funding instruments remain open to nuclear-related projects where relevant and consistent with their respective objectives.
The Commission should clarify eligibility pathways for nuclear-adjacent research and innovation activities under Horizon Europe, including in areas such as materials, digital technologies, safety engineering, industrialisation and advanced manufacturing. The Commission should identify areas where joint actions between the Euratom Programme and other Union programmes would deliver greater benefits to Union citizens than actions undertaken under the Programme alone, and should systematically pursue synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union instruments in order to maximise impact, coherence and European added value.
Potential synergies shall include:

Or. en

Amendment 70

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and Union programmes can be of greater benefit to Union citizens than having actions under the Programme alone. For this reason, the Programme should seek synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes.(6) To maximise the benefits for Union citizens, the Programme should pursue synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes through joint and coordinated actions. Co-funding and cross-eligible calls between the Programme and Horizon Europe should enable appropriate financing for innovative nuclear research projects, including in the field of advanced reactor technologies and medical radioisotopes, and should ensure that research entities from across the Union can effectively participate in collaborative actions.

Or. en

Amendment 71

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and Union programmes can be of greater benefit to Union citizens than having actions under the Programme alone. For this reason, the Programme should seek synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes.(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and Union programmes can be of greater benefit to Union citizens than having actions under the Programme alone. For this reason, the Programme should seek synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes supporting skills, industrial capacity, regional development, cohesion, innovation ecosystems and strategic technologies, while ensuring legal clarity, non-duplication of support and coherence in implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 72

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and Union programmes can be of greater benefit to Union citizens than having actions under the Programme alone. For this reason, the Programme should seek synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes.(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and Union programmes can be of greater benefit to Union citizens than having actions under the Programme alone. For this reason, the Programme should seek synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes, with appropriate long-term planning based on well-defined measurable objectives and performance indicators to ensure the efficient use of resources and rigorous impact assessment.

Or. ro

Justification

The achievement of the Union’s objectives in various fields can only be achieved through joint actions for which there is long-term planning, and through the efficient use of resources.

Amendment 73

Tomas Tobé, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and Union programmes can be of greater benefit to Union citizens than having actions under the Programme alone. For this reason, the Programme should seek synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes.(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and Union programmes can be of greater benefit to Union citizens than having actions under the Programme alone. For this reason, the Programme should seek broad synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes, including the ECF, through co-funding and cross-eligible calls, so as to ensure appropriate financing for nuclear fission innovation.

Or. en

Amendment 74

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6) There are areas where joint actions between the Programme and Union programmes can be of greater benefit to Union citizens than having actions under the Programme alone. For this reason, the Programme should seek synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes.(6) To maximise the benefits for Union citizens, the Programme should pursue synergies with Horizon Europe and other Union programmes through joint and coordinated actions. Co-funding and cross-eligible calls between the Programme and Horizon Europe should enable appropriate financing for innovative nuclear research projects, including in the medical sector.

Or. en

Amendment 75

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6 a) ECF: the European Competitiveness Fund shall contribute to structuring Euratom innovation activities around complementary streams, including innovations in processes for sustainable development and resource efficiency, such as water management, waste minimisation and recovery, and advanced fuels, as well as innovations in construction techniques, performance, safety and security, including advanced manufacturing, artificial intelligence, digital twins, augmented operator systems, instrumentation and sensors, command-and-control systems and passive safety technologies. It shall also support appropriate research activities, including demonstrators and verification and validation experimental facilities, as a complement to Horizon Europe, in order to promote the safe development and deployment of nuclear energy and strengthen the Union’s research and industrial capacities.

Or. en

Amendment 76

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6 b) European Industrial Alliance on SMRs: the programme shall support the European Industrial Alliance on Small Modular Reactors, in coordination with DG ENER and DG GROW, in order to strengthen research, industrial deployment, supply-chain resilience and skills development across the Union. Adequate resources for research, innovation and training should be mobilised through Horizon Europe for activities that are not strictly nuclear in nature and through the Euratom fission programme, including in the context of its future extension, in order to ensure coordinated support along the full innovation chain and to strengthen European industrial and technological capacities.

Or. en

Amendment 77

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6 c) NZIA: the programme shall promote synergies with instruments established under Regulation (EU) 2024/1735, including Net-Zero Acceleration Valleys, European Net-Zero Industry Academies and Strategic Projects, in order to support skills development, industrial deployment and the scaling-up of net-zero technologies across the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 78

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6 d) CRMA: the programme shall promote synergies with instruments established under Regulation (EU) 2024/1252, including Strategic Projects, partnerships and measures supporting the resilience and diversification of supply chains for critical raw materials, in order to strengthen security of supply, reduce strategic dependencies and support the sustainable development of the Union’s industrial base.

Or. en

Amendment 79

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 e (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6 e) Action Plan for Affordable Energy: the programme shall ensure coherence with the Action Plan for Affordable Energy, including by supporting the assessment of measures to simplify permitting and licensing practices for new nuclear technologies, such as Small Modular Reactors, evaluating investment needs in nuclear energy, including through the updated Nuclear Illustrative Programme (PINC), and contributing to the development of next-generation clean energy technologies, including nuclear fusion.

Or. en

Amendment 80

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 f (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6 f) Electrification Action Plan, Connecting Europe Facility and European Grid Package: the programme shall promote coherence and synergies with these Union initiatives, with a view to supporting the integration of low-carbon electricity, strengthening grid infrastructure and advancing the electrification of the Union’s energy system.

Or. en

Amendment 81

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 g (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6 g) External policy: the Programme may support the nuclear sector in the Union’s external action policies, in particular through strengthened synergies with the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument, in order to ensure that nuclear policy is coherently embedded in development, trade and strategic partnership objectives, while promoting European expertise, standards and technological leadership at international level.

Or. en

Amendment 82

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 h (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6 h) Union of Skills: the programme shall support intensified efforts in education and continuing professional training, with a view to strengthening skills development, workforce renewal and long-term expertise across the Union’s research and innovation ecosystem. It shall promote the development of competences in the nuclear domain by enhancing the attractiveness of nuclear careers, expanding recruitment pipelines, supporting scientific and technical education, adapting curricula to evolving skills needs and regional contexts, removing barriers to apprenticeships and vocational training, pooling training resources across the nuclear supply chain and facilitating the integration of young professionals into the workforce. The programme shall also support lifelong learning, education and training for researchers, clinicians and technical staff involved in nuclear-related applications, including nuclear medicine. It shall strengthen European coordination in education and training, including through relevant networks, in order to reduce fragmentation and avoid redundancies or gaps between programmes. Further investment in education and training initiatives should be ensured to support a skilled and resilient workforce for the future of the nuclear sector, including through academic programmes, vocational training, apprenticeships and lifelong learning across the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 83

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7) In a rapidly changing economic, social and geopolitical environment, recent experience has shown the need for more flexible multiannual financial framework and spending programmes. To that effect, and in line with the objectives of the Programme, the funding should duly consider the evolving policy needs and the Union’s priorities as identified in relevant documents published by the Commission, European Parliament resolutions and in Council conclusions, while ensuring sufficient predictability for the budget’s implementation.(7) In a rapidly changing economic, social and geopolitical environment, recent experience has shown the need for more flexible multiannual financial framework and spending programmes. To that effect, and in line with the objectives of the Programme, the funding should duly consider the evolving policy needs, including the security and resilience of nuclear supply chains against disruptions arising from geopolitical tensions or armed conflict, and the Union's priorities as identified in relevant documents published by the Commission, European Parliament resolutions and in Council conclusions, while ensuring sufficient predictability for the budget's implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 84

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7) In a rapidly changing economic, social and geopolitical environment, recent experience has shown the need for more flexible multiannual financial framework and spending programmes. To that effect, and in line with the objectives of the Programme, the funding should duly consider the evolving policy needs and the Union’s priorities as identified in relevant documents published by the Commission, European Parliament resolutions and in Council conclusions, while ensuring sufficient predictability for the budget’s implementation.(7) In a rapidly changing economic, social and geopolitical environment, recent experience has shown the need for more flexible multiannual financial framework and spending programmes. To that effect, and in line with the objectives of the Programme, the funding should duly consider the evolving policy needs, including the security of energy supply and the resilience of European nuclear supply chains, and the Union's priorities as identified in relevant documents published by the Commission, European Parliament resolutions and in Council conclusions, while ensuring sufficient predictability for the budget’s implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 85

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7 a) In this context, the timeframe and budget allocated to selected projects are often misaligned with the specific nature of the nuclear sector, which relies on long-term planning and continuity of support over decades. The characteristics of the sector require extended timelines and sustained financial backing to ensure successful innovation and implementation. Research, innovation and skills policies should therefore reflect the scale and time horizon of investments required in the nuclear domain, which constitutes a highly capital-intensive endeavour, including for emerging fusion start-ups, for which securing adequate and predictable financing is critical.

Or. en

Amendment 86

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7 a) The insufficient Union funding for fission-related R&I activities stands in clear contrast with the scale of support provided in competing economies, including the United States and the United Kingdom, both of which have launched ambitious programmes dedicating substantial resources to new reactor deployment, SMR development, and advanced reactor demonstrations. This level of investment significantly surpasses the resources currently allocated to fission innovation in the Union, where continued disinvestment risks undermining the Union's technological leadership, competitiveness, and strategic autonomy.

Or. en

Amendment 87

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7 b) Nuclear installed capacity across the EU is projected to grow from 98 GWe in 2025 to at least 109 GWe by 2050.

Or. en

Amendment 88

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7 c) According to the Commission's 8th Nuclear Illustrative Programme (PINC), nuclear energy will require at least EUR 241 billion in investment by 2050, covering lifetime extensions of existing reactors and the construction of new large-scale reactors, with a view to decarbonise the EU energy system and strengthen the Union's competitiveness. Further investment will also be needed for small modular reactors (SMRs), advanced modular reactors (AMRs), microreactors, and fusion in the longer term.

Or. en

Amendment 89

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7 d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7 d) The Commission's SMR Strategy, adopted on 10 March 2026, and the European Industrial Alliance on SMRs set out a coordinated approach to accelerating the commercial deployment of small modular reactors (SMRs) in Europe. Building on these initiatives, the Programme should prioritise research and innovation supporting the industrialisation, standardisation, and deployment of European SMR and advanced modular reactor (AMR) designs, with a view to strengthen energy security and Union competitiveness.

Or. en

Amendment 90

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8) The Programme applies Horizon Europe’s rules for participation and dissemination and is part of the ECF’s digital framework and makes use of its corporate information and communication tools to further simplify access, enhance openness and maximise the impact of Union funding.(8) The Programme applies Horizon Europe’s rules for participation and dissemination and is part of the ECF’s digital framework and makes use of its corporate information and communication tools to further simplify access, enhance openness and maximise the impact of Union funding. Strengthening the European nuclear value chain contributes to reducing the Union’s dependency on external energy suppliers and enhances its strategic autonomy.

Or. en

Amendment 91

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9) The Programme should contribute to increasing public and private investment in research and innovation (R&I) in Member States, thereby helping to reach an overall investment target of at least 3% of the Union’s gross domestic product (GDP) in research and development. Member States’ investment in R&I should be assessed with the help of the framework for the coordination of economic, budgetary, employment and social policies within the Union – the European Semester process. Achieving that target would require Member States and the private sector to complement the Programme with their own reinforced investment actions in research, development and innovation. The Union has made steady progress in increasing research and development investments but is lagging behind other global leaders. The 3% target mentioned earlier, set over two decades ago, acknowledged the importance of research and development as a foundation for a knowledge-based society. While the target encouraged various Member States to set their own research and development intensity goals, significant disparities remain as only a few Member States have reached or exceeded their investment ambition.(9) The investment needs for nuclear energy in the Union are substantial and reflect the strategic role of the sector in ensuring energy security, decarbonisation and industrial competitiveness. According to the latest Nuclear Illustrative Programme (PINC), nuclear energy will require investments of around €241 billion by 2050, covering both the lifetime extension of existing reactors and the construction of new large-scale facilities. This corresponds to approximately 1.3 % of the Union’s current GDP (estimated at around €18 trillion), highlighting the macroeconomic scale of the effort required. However, this figure represents only a baseline and does not fully capture additional investment needs related to the development and deployment of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), microreactors, fusion technologies, as well as the reinforcement of the nuclear fuel cycle, supply chains and associated infrastructures. Taking these elements into account, the overall investment effort required to ensure a resilient and competitive European nuclear ecosystem is likely to be significantly higher. In this context, the Programme should contribute to structuring and leveraging both public and private investment in nuclear research and innovation, with a view to supporting the progressive renewal and expansion of the Union’s nuclear fleet. This implies a sustained investment intensity over several decades, commensurate with the capital-intensive nature and long lifecycles of nuclear infrastructures, and requires appropriate financial instruments to de-risk projects and mobilise private capital. Current budgetary allocations to advanced nuclear technologies, including fuel-cycle-related activities, remain insufficient to enable the formation of large-scale consortia and the deployment of impactful projects, such as experimental facilities and innovation demonstrators at technology readiness levels above TRL 5. Strengthening investment in these areas is therefore essential to ensure technological leadership, industrial capacity and the long-term sustainability of the nuclear sector in the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 92

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9a) The Union can support the convergence of research and innovation performance among Member States by means of actions to strengthen institutional capacities, develop research infrastructure and foster cross-border collaboration. This will make it possible to reduce regional disparities in R&I, which would help to unlock the full potential of the internal market and create a more cohesive and globally competitive European innovation ecosystem. It is also essential to encourage the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises, start-ups and emerging actors in research and innovation activities by facilitating access to finance, simplifying administrative procedures and promoting public-private partnerships. Particular emphasis should be placed on knowledge transfer and the exploitation of research findings, to the shortest possible timescale, so as to ensure that innovative ideas are turned into added-value products and services. At the same time, investment in skills and education, including the training of researchers to ensure the availability of a specialised workforce in the medium and long term, and talent attraction are key to sustaining the Union’s innovation capacity in the long term. In this connection, promoting the mobility of researchers and strengthening cooperation between academia, industry and the public sector would help create a more integrated and dynamic European Research Area.

Or. ro

Justification

The challenges that the Union is currently facing call for measures and actions to ensure knowledge transfer and the exploitation of research findings, to the shortest possible timescale, so as to ensure that innovative ideas are turned into added-value products and services.

Amendment 93

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9 a) Nuclear research and the nuclear industry in the Union face a structural deficit of qualified personnel. Estimates indicate a need for several hundred thousand new recruits in the sector over the coming decade, a substantial share of whom must hold specialist qualifications in nuclear science and technology. To strengthen the Union's position and ensure that expertise is present where it is needed, the Programme should actively promote the development and retention of nuclear competences, including through increased researcher mobility, access to research infrastructures and targeted support for education and training programmes with a proven track record, such as those carried out under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions and the GENTLE and ENEN networks.

Or. en

Amendment 94

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9 a) While the proposed budgetary increase for the Programme is welcomed, the nuclear sector faces unprecedented workforce needs estimated at 450 000 new recruits over the next decade, of which 150 000 specialised in nuclear science and technology. In order to maintain and strengthen the Union's competitive position in nuclear technologies, in particular for SMRs and advanced modular reactors, a sustained and ambitious commitment to research and training funding is essential.

Or. en

Amendment 95

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9 b) Recent geopolitical developments have prompted a fundamental reassessment of the role of nuclear technologies within the Union's energy strategy. There is growing recognition among Member States of the need to strengthen investment in nuclear research and innovation, particularly in Member States that are currently constructing new nuclear capacity or preparing to develop nuclear energy programmes on their territory. The Programme should actively support such Member States in building the scientific, technical and industrial capabilities necessary for the safe deployment of nuclear technologies.

Or. en

Amendment 96

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9 c) Nuclear fuel circularity — encompassing the recycling and reuse of spent fuel — is a scientifically proven method of reducing the Union's dependence on external raw material sources while minimising radioactive waste volumes. Strengthening the European nuclear fuel cycle, including the development of domestically produced alternative fuel solutions for reactor designs currently reliant on supply from outside the Union, is essential for long-term energy sovereignty and industrial competitiveness. The Programme should support research and demonstration projects in this field.

Or. en

Amendment 97

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9 c) The concept of nuclear fuel circularity, including the recycling and reuse of spent fuel, constitutes a proven approach to reducing dependency on external mining and minimising radioactive waste volumes. The Programme should support research demonstrating solutions for the reduction, recycling and reuse of nuclear materials.

Or. en

Amendment 98

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9 d) The security of nuclear supply chains — covering uranium conversion and enrichment, fuel fabrication, reactor components and spare parts — is a strategic concern of the first order. Supply disruptions arising from armed conflict, trade restrictions or geopolitical instability can jeopardise the continuous operation of nuclear installations and threaten the energy security of the Union and its Member States. The Programme should support research and innovation aimed at diversifying and strengthening European nuclear supply chains, reducing strategic dependencies, and ensuring continuity of supply under all foreseeable circumstances. Member States that rely on fuel or components sourced from third countries with elevated geopolitical risk should be given priority access to relevant Programme actions.

Or. en

Amendment 99

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 e (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9 e) Significant reductions in the Euratom research and training programme budgets allocated to fission energy research over recent decades have contributed to a loss of competencies and a weakening of nuclear energy capabilities within the Union, while other global actors have continued to expand their nuclear industries. Given the renewed strategic importance of nuclear energy for the Union's energy security, industrial competitiveness and stable electricity supply, the proposed overall budgetary increase is a step in the right direction. A further and dedicated increase in the allocation for fission research is necessary to enable the Union to regain and consolidate its technological leadership in this field.

Or. en

Amendment 100

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 e (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(9 e) Recent geopolitical developments have led to a reassessment of the role of nuclear technologies in the Union. There is renewed interest among Member States in strengthening investment in nuclear research and innovation, as reflected in the creation of the European Industrial Alliance on Small Modular Reactors and the adoption of the Commission Communication on a Strategy for the development and deployment of SMRs in Europe.

Or. en

Amendment 101

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(10) As in Horizon Europe, the OECD definitions regarding technological readiness levels (TRLs) should continue to be taken into account in the classification of technological research, product development and demonstration activities and in the definition of types of action available in calls for proposals. Grants should not be awarded for actions where activities go above TRL 8.(10) As in Horizon Europe, the OECD definitions regarding technological readiness levels (TRLs) should continue to be taken into account in the classification of technological research, product development and demonstration activities and in the definition of types of action available in calls for proposals.
In this context, a structured “innovation pipeline” approach based on TRL progression should be established, ensuring a coherent and continuous transition from fundamental research to market deployment and providing a clear linkage between successive stages of research, innovation and industrial development, with early-stage activities supported under research-oriented instruments, mid-TRL activities under collaborative research and innovation actions, and high-TRL scale-up and deployment supported through instruments such as the European Competitiveness Fund and InvestEU.
A robust methodology should link TRL progression with the stages of industrial and start-up development, ensuring continuity along integrated value chains and addressing gaps in the transition from research to deployment, while ensuring appropriate industry involvement, including through thematic platforms and evaluation criteria reflecting commercial relevance, industrial impact and value-chain constraints, with a view to strengthening strategic autonomy and supporting long-term industrial roadmaps.
Governance arrangements should ensure strong coordination between Union programmes, including clear roles, mandates and decision-making structures, balanced representation of research and industrial actors, and effective bridging instruments between successive funding stages. In this context, the European Innovation Council should support early and intermediate stages of innovation, while scale-up and market integration should be supported through dedicated Union financial instruments.
Grants and prizes should primarily support research and early-stage innovation activities, and grants should not be awarded for actions where activities go above TRL 8, while financing under the European Competitiveness Fund and InvestEU should target scale-up operations and market deployment of projects that have reached a high TRL and demonstrated sufficient market readiness. In this context, the implementation of large-scale projects such as ITER should provide a reference framework for performance indicators, project management practices and long-term planning, reflecting the specific characteristics of complex, capital-intensive research infrastructures.
The Commission should mobilise adequate research, innovation and skills resources to secure European technological leadership and industrial capacity, including by ensuring that relevant industrial alliances are equipped with sufficient means for research and training.

Or. en

Amendment 102

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(11) It should be possible to implement parts of the budget through European Partnerships together with other public and private entities, where this is the most effective implementation form to achieve the policy objectives. European Partnerships should be established where a close involvement of the Union is required and should ensure appropriate voting rights for the Union as well as sufficient co-investment by other partners to leverage Union funding. In view of fostering synergies and efficiencies, it is necessary to ensure harmonised rules. Therefore, a strategic and coherent portfolio of a limited number of European Partnerships should be established.(11) It should be possible to implement parts of the budget through European Partnerships together with other public and private entities, where this is the most effective implementation form to achieve the policy objectives, with these Partnerships being based on well-defined criteria and enabling the potential of all regions to be harnessed. European Partnerships should be established where a close involvement of the Union is required and should ensure appropriate voting rights for the Union as well as sufficient co-investment by other partners to leverage Union funding. In view of fostering synergies and efficiencies, it is necessary to ensure harmonised rules. Therefore, a strategic and coherent portfolio of a limited number of European Partnerships, which are clearly identified on the basis of well-defined EU-level criteria, should be established.

Or. ro

Justification

European Partnerships are, and will, remain key to achieving European objectives and harnessing the potential of all the Member States and their regions.

Amendment 103

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(11) It should be possible to implement parts of the budget through European Partnerships together with other public and private entities, where this is the most effective implementation form to achieve the policy objectives. European Partnerships should be established where a close involvement of the Union is required and should ensure appropriate voting rights for the Union as well as sufficient co-investment by other partners to leverage Union funding. In view of fostering synergies and efficiencies, it is necessary to ensure harmonised rules. Therefore, a strategic and coherent portfolio of a limited number of European Partnerships should be established.(11) It should be possible to implement parts of the budget through European Partnerships together with other public and private entities, where a sufficient number of Member States and stakeholders agree on a memorandum of understanding aligned with the Union’s guidelines. European Partnerships should ensure appropriate voting rights for the Union, as well as sufficient co-investment by other partners in order to leverage Union funding. In order to foster synergies and efficiencies, harmonised rules should be ensured. A strategic and coherent portfolio of purpose-driven European Partnerships, based on clearly identified real-world challenges, should therefore be established, while limiting their overall number and allocating a greater share of resources to Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) and Innovation Actions (IA).

Or. en

Amendment 104

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(12) European Partnerships, as an essential tool to deliver on industrial involvement and investment in collaborative research and innovation, should contribute to the specific policy objectives of the policy windows of the ECF and be supported through it, where necessary, to complete these objectives.(12) European Partnerships, as an essential tool to support industrial involvement and investment in collaborative research and innovation, should contribute to the specific policy objectives of the policy windows of the European Competitiveness Fund and, where necessary, be supported through it in order to achieve those objectives.

Or. en

Amendment 105

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 13

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(13) The Joint Research Centre (‘JRC’) should continue to provide independent scientific evidence and technical support for Union policies throughout the whole policy cycle. The direct actions of the JRC should be implemented in a flexible, efficient, and transparent manner, taking into account the needs of Union policies and the relevant needs of the users of the JRC and ensuring the protection of the Union’s financial interests. The JRC should continue to generate additional resources, which it may use to support its scientific and technical activities.(13) The Joint Research Centre (‘JRC’) should continue to provide independent scientific evidence and technical support for Union policies throughout the whole policy cycle. The direct actions of the JRC should be implemented in a flexible, efficient, and transparent manner, taking into account the needs of Union policies and the relevant needs of the users of the JRC and ensuring the protection of the Union’s financial interests. The JRC should continue to generate additional resources, which it may use to support its scientific and technical activities. The programme should strengthen the involvement of the JRC in indirect actions, in order to facilitate access to its infrastructures and expertise, enhance scientific coordination and maximise the impact of Union-funded projects. In this context, the Commission should address reported difficulties in accessing JRC infrastructures and researchers, including by establishing clearer access procedures, service catalogues and coordination mechanisms. Continued and reinforced support for the JRC should be ensured, notably to maintain its nuclear infrastructures and human expertise, and to enable its effective participation in collaborative research with other organisations, thereby enhancing coordination, knowledge transfer and overall impact.

Or. en

Amendment 106

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14) The Programme should ensure the effective promotion and protection of values and principles of the European Research Area and the Pact for Research and Innovation5 , notably ethics and integrity in research and innovation, freedom of scientific research, science for policy, gender equality and equal opportunities, non-discrimination, open science and the promotion of attractive research careers and mobility. In particular, the Programme should ensure the effective promotion of equal opportunities for all and the implementation of gender mainstreaming, including the integration of the gender dimension in R&I content. It should aim to address the causes of gender imbalance. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring, to the extent possible, gender balance in evaluation panels and in other relevant advisory bodies such as boards and expert groups.(14) The Programme should ensure the effective promotion and protection of values and principles of the European Research Area and the Pact for Research and Innovation5 , notably ethics and integrity in research and innovation, freedom of scientific research, science for policy, a strictly merit-based approach to research funding and evaluation, regardless of identity-based characteristics, as well as open science in accordance with the principle of “as open as possible, as closed as necessary,” and the promotion of attractive research careers and mobility. In particular, the Programme should ensure equal treatment and equal opportunities based on merit and achievement, without discrimination or preferential treatment linked to personal or identity-based characteristics. Scientific excellence, competence and proven achievement shall remain the sole relevant criteria for the selection of projects, researchers and experts. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring that evaluation panels and other relevant advisory bodies, such as boards and expert groups, are composed on the basis of expertise, independence and scientific standing, to the extent possible and in full respect of merit-based principles. The Programme should also promote and uphold high scientific reference standards, ensuring that funded research is conducted in a manner that is reproducible, transparent and subject to rigorous and unbiased peer review. Research activities should be designed to communicate uncertainty and error, support collaboration and interdisciplinarity, enable the falsifiability of hypotheses and accept negative results as valid scientific outcomes, while ensuring the absence of conflicts of interest. In this context, the Programme should ensure the prevention of research misconduct, including fabrication, falsification and plagiarism, and promote the “weight of scientific evidence” approach, whereby all relevant information is assessed on the basis of its quality and relevance and integrated transparently in scientific evaluations in order to support robust, credible and impartial decision-making.
5 Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/2122 of 26 November 2021 on a Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe, OJ L 431, 2.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2122/oj5 Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/2122 of 26 November 2021 on a Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe, OJ L 431, 2.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2122/oj

Or. en

Amendment 107

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14) The Programme should ensure the effective promotion and protection of values and principles of the European Research Area and the Pact for Research and Innovation5 , notably ethics and integrity in research and innovation, freedom of scientific research, science for policy, gender equality and equal opportunities, non-discrimination, open science and the promotion of attractive research careers and mobility. In particular, the Programme should ensure the effective promotion of equal opportunities for all and the implementation of gender mainstreaming, including the integration of the gender dimension in R&I content. It should aim to address the causes of gender imbalance. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring, to the extent possible, gender balance in evaluation panels and in other relevant advisory bodies such as boards and expert groups.(14) The Programme should ensure the effective promotion of equal opportunities for all and excellence-based selection in evaluation panels and other relevant advisory bodies.
5 Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/2122 of 26 November 2021 on a Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe, OJ L 431, 2.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2122/oj

Or. en

Amendment 108

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14) The Programme should ensure the effective promotion and protection of values and principles of the European Research Area and the Pact for Research and Innovation5 , notably ethics and integrity in research and innovation, freedom of scientific research, science for policy, gender equality and equal opportunities, non-discrimination, open science and the promotion of attractive research careers and mobility. In particular, the Programme should ensure the effective promotion of equal opportunities for all and the implementation of gender mainstreaming, including the integration of the gender dimension in R&I content. It should aim to address the causes of gender imbalance. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring, to the extent possible, gender balance in evaluation panels and in other relevant advisory bodies such as boards and expert groups.(14) The Programme should ensure the effective promotion and protection of values and principles of the European Research Area and the Pact for Research and Innovation, notably ethics and integrity in research and innovation, freedom of scientific research, science for policy, equal opportunities, open science and the promotion of attractive research careers and mobility. The Programme should ensure that the selection of participants and evaluation panels is based on scientific merit and excellence.
5 Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/2122 of 26 November 2021 on a Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe, OJ L 431, 2.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2122/oj

Or. en

Amendment 109

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14) The Programme should ensure the effective promotion and protection of values and principles of the European Research Area and the Pact for Research and Innovation5 , notably ethics and integrity in research and innovation, freedom of scientific research, science for policy, gender equality and equal opportunities, non-discrimination, open science and the promotion of attractive research careers and mobility. In particular, the Programme should ensure the effective promotion of equal opportunities for all and the implementation of gender mainstreaming, including the integration of the gender dimension in R&I content. It should aim to address the causes of gender imbalance. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring, to the extent possible, gender balance in evaluation panels and in other relevant advisory bodies such as boards and expert groups.(14) The Programme should ensure the effective promotion and protection of values and principles of the European Research Area and the Pact for Research and Innovation5 , notably ethics and integrity in research and innovation, freedom of scientific research, science for policy, gender equality and equal opportunities, non-discrimination, open science and the promotion of attractive, stable and high-quality research careers and fair mobility. In particular, the Programme should ensure the effective promotion of equal opportunities for all and the implementation of gender mainstreaming, including the integration of the gender dimension in R&I content. It should aim to address the causes of gender imbalance. The Programme should also encourage inclusive working and training environments, including for persons with disabilities and underrepresented groups. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring, to the extent possible, gender balance in evaluation panels and in other relevant advisory bodies such as boards and expert groups.
5 Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/2122 of 26 November 2021 on a Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe, OJ L 431, 2.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2122/oj5 Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/2122 of 26 November 2021 on a Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe, OJ L 431, 2.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2122/oj

Or. en

Amendment 110

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14 a) European nuclear research infrastructures, including those operated by the Joint Research Centre, play a unique role in maintaining the Union's independent research capacity in this field. These facilities — including research reactors, hot laboratories and fuel cycle research centres — underpin education, training and scientific exchange across the Union. Access to such infrastructures should be open to researchers from all Member States on equal terms, with particular attention to ensuring that researchers from institutions with relevant experience in nuclear energy participate effectively in collaborative actions under the Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 111

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(14 a) Recognising the need for a highly skilled workforce in nuclear science and technology, the Programme shall prioritise the development and retention of nuclear skills and competences across the Union. The Programme will support students, researchers and professionals through specialised training, mobility opportunities and improved access to research infrastructures, in synergy with the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions. It will also contribute to maintaining and upgrading key nuclear research infrastructures and promote cross-border cooperation.

Or. en

Amendment 112

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities.(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities. In this context, the programme shall support increased investment in research and technology infrastructures, recognising their essential role in sustaining scientific excellence, promoting mutualisation and economies of scale, enabling large-scale collaboration and accelerating innovation. The Commission and the Member States should ensure coordinated, long-term and accessible funding for infrastructures across the Union. Project durations and budgets should be aligned with the specific characteristics of the nuclear sector, including its long planning cycles and the need for continuity over decades. The Commission should therefore adapt programme implementation accordingly, including through longer-duration actions where appropriate and stable multiannual support for critical capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 113

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities.(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. In view of current geopolitical instability, the physical security and resilience of such infrastructures against external threats, including those arising from armed conflict or deliberate attacks, should be treated as a priority. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, including from Member States that are developing or planning to develop nuclear energy on their territory, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States' capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 114

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities.(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. In particular, ageing research reactors must be refurbished and modernised to ensure a continuous and safe supply of medical radioisotopes. In view of geopolitical uncertainty, the security of such infrastructures should be a priority. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States' capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 115

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities.(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology and fostering integrated and interdisciplinary approaches which require a combination of scientific research, technological innovation and public policies. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities.

Or. ro

Amendment 116

Georgiana Teodorescu

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities.(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology deployment. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities.

Or. en

Justification

Given nuclear's recognition as a key clean technology to ensure energy sovereignty in Europe, Euratom should support, beyond research on safety, research on innovative nuclear fission solutions, from concept to deployment.

Amendment 117

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are pivotal assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities.(15) Nuclear research infrastructures are assets for the Union, providing essential tools and equipment to advance research in science and technology. The development, integration and financial sustainability of such research infrastructures of Union interest should ensure operational excellence and continuous accessibility to European researchers, enabling collaborative and cross-border research while complementing Member States’ capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 118

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15 a) Research and technology infrastructures in nuclear research may include research reactors, which are nuclear reactors used for research and development purposes as well as for theoretical and practical training. Such infrastructures play a central role in the production of experimental data, the testing and qualification of fuels and materials, the validation of safety-related methodologies and the development of scientific and technical competences across the nuclear sector.

Or. en

Amendment 119

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15 b) They may also include nuclear energy infrastructures linked to power generation and industrial research and development, notably experimental and research reactors, material testing reactors, critical facilities, power reactors and demonstration facilities. Such infrastructures support the development, testing and demonstration of Generation II and III technologies, as well as advanced Generation IV systems and Small Modular Reactors and Advanced Modular Reactors, with a view to strengthening low-carbon electricity production, industrial innovation and long-term technological capacity in the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 120

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15 c) Research and technology infrastructures in nuclear research may further include fusion-related infrastructures, such as tokamaks, stellarators and private-sector prototypes, which support plasma confinement research, enabling technologies and the progressive demonstration of fusion as a future source of energy production.

Or. en

Amendment 121

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15 d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15 d) They may also cover infrastructures across the nuclear fuel cycle, which constitutes a strategic industrial chain, including conversion, enrichment, fuel fabrication, recycling and reprocessing facilities, as well as intermediate storage and geological disposal infrastructures for radioactive waste. Such infrastructures are essential to strengthen security of supply, support fuel-cycle circularity, reduce strategic dependencies and ensure the safe and sustainable management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.

Or. en

Amendment 122

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15 e (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15 e) Research and technology infrastructures may furthermore include infrastructures dedicated to nuclear safety, radioprotection and metrology, such as radioprotection laboratories, dosimetry and radiobiology facilities, safety test benches, irradiation facilities and nuclear metrology infrastructures for calibration and standardised measurement. These infrastructures are necessary to maintain and continuously improve high standards of safety, radiation protection, comparability of measurements and regulatory reliability across the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 123

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15 f (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15 f) They may also include applied and dual-use infrastructures at the interface between science, industry and health, including infrastructures for the production of medical isotopes, nuclear imaging and radiotherapy, as well as industrial irradiation facilities, non-destructive testing facilities and infrastructures relevant to critical applications, including nuclear security, defence and space. Such infrastructures contribute to medical innovation, industrial competitiveness and the resilience of strategically important sectors.

Or. en

Amendment 124

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15 g (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15 g) Finally, research and technology infrastructures in nuclear research may include transversal and ecosystemic infrastructures supporting coordination, innovation and capacity-building across the Union, including European and international research networks, Euratom-related structures, industrial alliances, collaborative research and development platforms, public-private partnerships, training infrastructures, university networks and centres of excellence. Such infrastructures help ensure the integration, accessibility, mutualisation and long-term sustainability of the European nuclear research and innovation landscape.

Or. en

Amendment 125

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) Acknowledging the benefit derived from international cooperation towards addressing, among others, shared technological, economic, environmental and societal concerns, the Programme, should promote cooperation with third countries. International cooperation should aim to strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and excellence in R&I, including its capacity to attract and retain the best talents worldwide. Geopolitical considerations, including economic security, should be at the centre of the approach and varying degrees of cooperation should be considered based on an overall assessment of the benefit that could be derived by the Union towards addressing its priorities and global challenges while safeguarding the Union’s values and interests. Association to all or parts of the Programme should remain the most comprehensive form of cooperation.(16) Acknowledging the benefit derived from international cooperation towards addressing, among others, shared technological, economic, environmental and societal concerns, the Programme, should promote cooperation with third countries while taking into account the nature of the relationship of these countries with the European Union and refraining from cooperation with hostile states. International cooperation should aim to strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and excellence in R&I, including its capacity to attract and retain the best talents worldwide. Geopolitical considerations, including economic security, should be at the centre of the approach and varying degrees of cooperation should be considered based on an overall assessment of the benefit that could be derived by the Union towards addressing its priorities and global challenges while safeguarding the Union’s values and interests. Association to all or parts of the Programme should remain the most comprehensive form of cooperation.

Or. en

Amendment 126

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) Acknowledging the benefit derived from international cooperation towards addressing, among others, shared technological, economic, environmental and societal concerns, the Programme, should promote cooperation with third countries. International cooperation should aim to strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and excellence in R&I, including its capacity to attract and retain the best talents worldwide. Geopolitical considerations, including economic security, should be at the centre of the approach and varying degrees of cooperation should be considered based on an overall assessment of the benefit that could be derived by the Union towards addressing its priorities and global challenges while safeguarding the Union’s values and interests. Association to all or parts of the Programme should remain the most comprehensive form of cooperation.(16) Acknowledging the benefit derived from international cooperation towards addressing, among others, shared technological, economic, environmental and societal concerns, the Programme, should promote cooperation with third countries through long-term planning based on well-defined measurable objectives and performance indicators. International cooperation should aim to strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and excellence in R&I, including its capacity to attract and retain the best talents worldwide. Geopolitical considerations, including economic security, should be at the centre of the approach and varying degrees of cooperation should be considered based on an overall assessment of the benefit that could be derived by the Union towards addressing its priorities and global challenges while safeguarding the Union’s values and interests. Association to all or parts of the Programme should remain the most comprehensive form of cooperation.

Or. ro

Justification

International cooperation is beneficial through the use of long-term planning, based on measurable objectives and well-defined performance indicators.

Amendment 127

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) Acknowledging the benefit derived from international cooperation towards addressing, among others, shared technological, economic, environmental and societal concerns, the Programme, should promote cooperation with third countries. International cooperation should aim to strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and excellence in R&I, including its capacity to attract and retain the best talents worldwide. Geopolitical considerations, including economic security, should be at the centre of the approach and varying degrees of cooperation should be considered based on an overall assessment of the benefit that could be derived by the Union towards addressing its priorities and global challenges while safeguarding the Union’s values and interests. Association to all or parts of the Programme should remain the most comprehensive form of cooperation.(16) Acknowledging the benefit derived from international cooperation towards addressing, among others, shared technological, economic, environmental and societal concerns, the Programme, should promote cooperation with third countries. International cooperation should aim to strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and excellence in R&I, including its capacity to attract and retain the best talents worldwide. Geopolitical considerations, including economic security, should be at the centre of the approach and varying degrees of cooperation should be considered based on an overall assessment of the benefit that could be derived by the Union towards addressing its priorities and global challenges while safeguarding the Union’s values and interests. Appropriate safeguards should be provided for sensitive knowledge, infrastructure and results. Association to all or parts of the Programme should remain the most comprehensive form of cooperation.

Or. en

Amendment 128

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16 a) Adopting a nuanced, granular and purpose-driven approach to international cooperation, and taking into account the vulnerabilities of research and innovation to foreign interference and security risks, openness towards associated and third countries should remain conditional and proportionate, in accordance with the principle “as open as possible, as closed as necessary”, and with due regard to the Union’s and Member States’ strategic interests, security and public order. Strategic autonomy should serve as a guiding principle, recognising that international partners may simultaneously be partners, competitors or systemic rivals depending on the research domain, and ensuring that cooperation is based on reciprocity, mutual benefit, strategic alignment, fair business practices and equivalent standards of protection. To that end, an appropriate risk-assessment framework for international cooperation should be established, taking into account risks of technological leakage, intellectual property misappropriation, unfair technology transfer and adverse effects on the Union’s strategic autonomy and security interests. Participation should be conditional upon reciprocity, ensure fair and balanced conditions, and include appropriate safeguards to prevent unwanted technology transfer or violations of intellectual property rights, while requiring associated countries to adopt this differentiated approach and to define clear and strategic rationales for collaboration consistent with the Union’s security, economic and technological interests.

Or. en

Amendment 129

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 .(18) In light of the particular vulnerability of nuclear installations to malicious acts and threats, including drone attacks, armed conflict and sabotage – as demonstrated by the Russian drone attack on the sarcophagus hull of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant – and the need to prevent the proliferation of nuclear material, stronger protections and dedicated research are urgently needed. The Programme should prioritise research on protecting nuclear facilities against drones, armed attacks and other deliberate threats, as well as the prevention, detection, and response to malicious nuclear acts. Non-proliferation of nuclear material must be addressed as a matter of the highest priority. Moreover, in light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 .
9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.
10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).
11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.

Or. en

Amendment 130

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 .(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 . Particular attention should be paid to emerging threats, including the use of unmanned systems, cyber-attacks, hybrid threats and risks affecting critical infrastructures, including the security of nuclear facilities and storage sites, as well as to strengthening risk preparedness and resilience to environmental hazards and extreme events.
9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.
10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).
11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.

Or. en

Amendment 131

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 .(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 . Activities under the Programme should also contribute to environmental sustainability, efficient resource use, pollution prevention, waste minimisation and consistency with the Union’s climate and environmental objectives, while respecting the specific nature of Euratom action.
9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.
10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).
11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.

Or. en

Amendment 132

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 .(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 . In this context, nuclear energy should be recognised as a reliable, firm and clean-source of electricity contributing not only to resilience and security of energy supply, but also to the achievement of EU decarbonisation targets.
9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.
10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).
11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.

Or. en

Amendment 133

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10. The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11.(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters through regional and cross-border level cooperation among all actors, with a view to developing contingency plans as rapidly as possible after the events have occurred. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10. The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11.
9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.
10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).
11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.

Or. ro

Justification

Climate change is one of the greatest global challenges and the Union and Member States must cooperate to anticipate crises and disasters and prepare a response to these.

Amendment 134

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 .(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, including those affecting nuclear supply chains, it is essential to enhance the Union's and Member States' capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy. The Programme acknowledges the central role of nuclear energy as a source of stable, reliable and clean electricity, indispensable to the energy security and economic sovereignty of the Union. Activities should support the safe operation, long-term maintenance and technological development of nuclear installations.
9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.
10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).
11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.

Or. en

Amendment 135

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges climate change as one of the biggest global and societal challenge and climate action as a driver for industrial competitiveness. Activities should reflect the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement11 .(18) In light of increasing risks linked to natural hazards, health emergencies, technological accidents, water scarcity, evolving security and energy supply threats and other disruptions, it is essential to enhance the Union’s and Member States’ capability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to crises and disasters. The Programme should support research that strengthens disaster risk and crisis management, invest in climate and water resilience and enhance the resilience of vital societal functions, and build a more resilient, secure and prepared Union, in line with the objectives of the European Preparedness Union Strategy9 and the Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports10 . The Programme acknowledges the importance of proven low-carbon energy technologies, including nuclear energy, in contributing to energy security and affordable energy supply. Activities should support the deployment of reliable and competitive low-carbon technologies.
10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports (COM(2025) 440, 12.5.2025).
11 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 4.
9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.9 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Preparedness Union Strategy, JOIN(2025) 130 final.

Or. en

Amendment 136

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19) Simplification in the Programme’s implementation is essential to ensure its accessibility and efficiency, particularly by reducing the administrative burden on beneficiaries and minimising the risk of errors. To this end, the Programme should primarily rely on lump sums as the default form of Union funding. Advancing efforts over the previous Framework Programmes to streamline funding rules and minimise errors, the reimbursement of personnel costs should also be further simplified by using personnel unit costs, which reduces complexity for participants and facilitates reporting.(19) Simplification in the Programme’s implementation is essential to ensure its accessibility and efficiency, particularly by reducing the administrative burden on beneficiaries and minimising the risk of errors. To this end, the Programme should primarily rely on lump sums as the default form of Union funding. Advancing efforts over the previous Framework Programmes to streamline funding rules and minimise errors, the reimbursement of personnel costs should also be further simplified by using personnel unit costs, which reduces complexity for participants and facilitates reporting. Beyond these measures, simplification and reduced administrative burden, in the Programme’s implementation, should be sought in every possible and duly justified regard.

Or. en

Amendment 137

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19 a) Limited budgets and infrequent calls for proposals, notably cycles of two to three years, undermine continuity of collaboration, retention of skilled researchers and industrial engagement. The Commission should therefore establish more regular call calendars and multiannual pipelines, including for demonstration-oriented actions, and increase the frequency of calls for proposals, including moving towards a biennial or more regular schedule, in order to improve the Programme’s responsiveness to emerging geopolitical developments and technological advances and to ensure continuity for beneficiaries and research consortia.

Or. en

Amendment 138

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19 b) Ongoing simplification efforts in the design and implementation of Union research programmes should be pursued, including by reducing the overall length of work programmes, limiting the number of topics, shortening topic descriptions and minimising single-project topics, in order to improve accessibility, flexibility and responsiveness. The Commission should adopt open topics by default, allowing applicants greater freedom to propose diverse scientific and technological pathways towards expected outcomes, while maintaining clear objectives, excellence-based evaluation and accountability.

Or. en

Amendment 139

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19 c) Further simplification and continuity in the funding landscape should be ensured, including through the rationalisation of action types and the introduction of harmonised funding rates, up to 100 %, except for for-profit entities other than SMEs where rates may reach up to 70 %, while allowing differentiated rates where justified by specific implementation needs.

Or. en

Amendment 140

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19 d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19 d) The use of simplified cost options, including lump-sum funding, financing not linked to costs and personnel unit-cost models, may be increased, building on experience under previous Framework Programmes, provided that such instruments effectively reduce administrative burden, widen participation, in particular for newcomers and smaller entities, and preserve sound financial management, transparency and auditability. However, lump-sum funding should not be applied indiscriminately, and a differentiated approach should be adopted to ensure that cost-based reimbursement remains available for large, complex or high-risk collaborative projects, in particular where scientific uncertainty, long-term activities or multi-entity coordination render lump sums unsuitable.

Or. en

Amendment 141

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 20

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(20) In view of strengthening the Union’s competitiveness and maximising the uptake and deployment of the results in general, beneficiaries owning results should manage their results in accordance with their obligations established under this Regulation regarding valorisation and dissemination. Those obligations may be adjusted in the work programme, call conditions or grant agreement where appropriate based on policy considerations, including related to economic security, but should encompass requirements to protect, give access, valorise results and make them public as appropriate and justified, including through open science practices. To facilitate and accelerate the valorisation process, support instruments and tools should be put in place in line with the Commission’s valorisation strategy as developed under Regulation [establishing the ECF] and any such support and services provided for in its Chapter III.(20) In view of strengthening the Union’s competitiveness and maximising the uptake and deployment of the results in general, beneficiaries owning results should manage their results in accordance with their obligations established under this Regulation regarding valorisation and dissemination. Those obligations may be adjusted in the work programme, call conditions or grant agreement where appropriate based on policy considerations, including related to economic security, but should encompass requirements to protect, give access, valorise results and make them public as appropriate and justified, including through open science practices. Publicly funded knowledge should, where appropriate, also be disseminated as widely as possible, including to public authorities, education and training bodies, workers and social partners, in order to support uptake, skills development, safety culture and evidence-based policymaking. To facilitate and accelerate the valorisation process, support instruments and tools should be put in place in line with the Commission’s valorisation strategy as developed under Regulation [establishing the ECF] and any such support and services provided for in its Chapter III.

Or. en

Amendment 142

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) In full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute towards a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air quality.(21) The development of nuclear energy remains a national prerogative within the framework of Union law, and, in full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute to a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air quality. Recent years have shown a growing interest among Member States in incorporating nuclear energy into their energy mix, advancing fusion research and expanding applications of ionising radiation. Several Member States are demonstrating their commitment to maintaining or expanding nuclear energy as a pillar of their national energy strategies, through lifetime extensions of existing reactors, the construction of large-scale reactors and the development of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), while others are considering its introduction. For those Member States choosing to include nuclear power in their energy mix, nuclear energy can play an important role in an integrated energy system with increasing penetration of renewables. In this context, a renewed international interest in nuclear energy is observed, including in Europe, which requires the Union, through Euratom, to support the maintenance and development of the necessary skills, industrial capacities and research infrastructures. Nuclear energy has also been recognised by various international authorities, including the European Commission, notably in the context of the Nuclear Energy Summit held in Brussels in March 2024, as an important component in achieving net-zero objectives.

Or. en

Amendment 143

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) In full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute towards a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air quality.(21) In full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute towards a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air quality, including through the contribution of nuclear energy as a stable component of the energy mix, with minimal lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions.

Or. en

Amendment 144

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) In full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute towards a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air quality.(21) In full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute towards a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air quality, recognising that many Member States will rely significantly on nuclear energy along their respective decarbonisation pathways.

Or. en

Amendment 145

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) In full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute towards a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air quality.(21) In full respect of the Member States' sovereign right to determine their national energy mix, the Programme's results should contribute towards a reliable, stable and secure energy system in which nuclear energy fulfils an essential function as a provider of firm, dispatchable and clean baseload electricity.

Or. en

Amendment 146

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) In full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute towards a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air quality.(21) In full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute towards a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air, water and soil quality.

Or. en

Amendment 147

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) In full respect of the Member States’ right to determine their choice between different energy sources, the Programme’s results should contribute towards a climate-neutral energy system with co-benefits for air quality.(21) In full respect of the Member States' sovereign right to determine their energy mix, the Programme's results should contribute towards a reliable, affordable and low-carbon energy system.

Or. en

Amendment 148

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 22

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(22) Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council12 lists nuclear amongst net-zero technologies and acknowledges that innovation will be a crucial factor in ensuring the Union’s competitiveness.deleted
12 Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology manufacturing ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (OJ L, 2024/1735, 28.6.2024), ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1735/oj

Or. en

Amendment 149

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 22

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(22) Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council12 lists nuclear amongst net-zero technologies and acknowledges that innovation will be a crucial factor in ensuring the Union’s competitiveness.(22) Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council lists nuclear amongst net-zero technologies and acknowledges that innovation will be a crucial factor in ensuring the Union's competitiveness. The Programme should stimulate innovation in the nuclear fission field, which will contribute directly to the Union's energy security, long-term industrial competitiveness and strategic autonomy. It should support the development of European nuclear technologies and related supply chains, and provide a framework that enables Member States to build on their respective scientific and industrial capacities in the nuclear sector, ensuring that researchers and institutions from across the Union can benefit from and contribute to programme-funded fission innovation.
12 Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology manufacturing ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (OJ L, 2024/1735, 28.6.2024), ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1735/oj

Or. en

Amendment 150

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 22

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(22) Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council12 lists nuclear amongst net-zero technologies and acknowledges that innovation will be a crucial factor in ensuring the Union’s competitiveness.(22) Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council12 lists nuclear amongst net-zero technologies and acknowledges that innovation will be a crucial factor in ensuring the Union's competitiveness. The Programme should stimulate innovation in the nuclear fission field, which will contribute directly to the objectives of energy security, competitiveness and strategic autonomy. It should foster the development of new European nuclear technologies and related supply chains, such as small and advanced modular reactors.
12 Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology manufacturing ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (OJ L, 2024/1735, 28.6.2024), ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1735/oj12 Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology manufacturing ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (OJ L, 2024/1735, 28.6.2024), ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1735/oj

Or. en

Amendment 151

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 22 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(22 a) To encourage long-term investment in nuclear energy research and production, it is essential that the EU address all barriers to public and private funding and support in the EU, be it at national or European level, for nuclear energy, which still persist in many legal texts despite a clear political commitment to support the technology. Updates shall be made inter alia to the Energy Union Governance Regulation (EU 2018/1999), the General Block Exemption Regulation (EU 651/2014), the European Taxonomy Regulation (EU 2019/2088), the Renewable Energy Directive (EU 2023/2413), by revising this latter into a low-carbon Directive, as well as all the secondary legislation of these texts.

Or. en

Amendment 152

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 23

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(23) As all Member States make use of radioactive materials, it is important to ensure the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, as required by the Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom13, to avoid undue burdens on future generations. The Programme should continue to improve and support research and development relating to technologies and competencies in spent fuel and radioactive waste management.(23) As all Member States make use of radioactive materials, it is important to ensure the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, as required by the Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom13, to avoid undue burdens on future generations. The Programme should continue to improve and support research and development relating to technologies and competencies in spent fuel and radioactive waste management with a view to developing safe, sustainable and efficient long-term solutions, including final geological disposal, reducing waste volume and toxicity, and improving treatment, transport and monitoring processes. It should also promote the exchange of best practices among Member States, institutional capacity building and the training of specialists, while ensuring transparency and public involvement in the decision-making process.
13 Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 48, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/70/oj).13 Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 48, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/70/oj).

Or. ro

Justification

Final geological disposal, reducing the volume and toxicity of waste and improving treatment, transport and monitoring processes are essential for the future of this area.

Amendment 153

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 23

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(23) As all Member States make use of radioactive materials, it is important to ensure the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, as required by the Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom13 , to avoid undue burdens on future generations. The Programme should continue to improve and support research and development relating to technologies and competencies in spent fuel and radioactive waste management.(23) As all Member States make use of radioactive materials, it is important to ensure the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and other radioactive waste, as required by the Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom13 , to avoid undue burdens on future generations. The Programme should continue to improve and support research and development relating to technologies and competencies in decommissioning of nuclear installations, the safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste management.
13 Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 48, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/70/oj).13 Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 48, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/70/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 154

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 23 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(23 a) The Programme shall continue promoting the demonstration of concepts and solutions supporting nuclear fuel circularity, including the reduction, recycling and reuse of relevant radioactive and non-radioactive waste streams, in line with objectives of independence from primary mining, waste minimisation, the resilience of nuclear fuel and the recovery of critical raw materials. It shall foster innovation in nuclear technologies, including advanced reactor designs, fuels and materials, while supporting the safe management, long-term storage and disposal of radioactive waste, including through the development of robust safety cases and safeguards approaches. In this context, research activities must not neglect the nuclear fuel cycle and the management of radioactive waste, including advanced options that can contribute to resource preservation and waste-impact reduction. Nuclear applications also contribute to the development of the circular economy, including through the valorisation of useful radioactive substances and through nuclear-based processes supporting the production and recovery of critical raw materials.

Or. en

Amendment 155

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 23 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(23 b) The programme shall also support innovation in nuclear technologies, including innovative reactor designs, fuels and advanced materials, while developing solutions for the safe management of radioactive waste and spent fuel. It shall support the development of robust safety cases and safeguards approaches for the deep geological disposal of intermediate- and high-level waste, ensuring the safe operation and oversight of disposal facilities, and shall assist Member States in defining and implementing national strategies for long-term storage and disposal through strengthened knowledge management, capacity-building and the sharing of best practices across the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 156

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 24

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(24) The Community should continue to play a key role in the development of fusion energy, recognising its potential significant benefits in ensuring long-term security and diversity of energy supply. Fusion energy research under the Programme should be implemented in accordance with [the Union’s Fusion Strategy]14 which outlines the actions, notably on research and development, required to advance towards a Union fusion pilot power plant. The strategy seeks a stronger involvement of industry and start-ups and encompasses alternative fusion concepts.deleted
14 European Strategy to harness Fusion Energy (COM(YYYY) NNN, DD.MM.YYYY).

Or. en

Amendment 157

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 24

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(24) The Community should continue to play a key role in the development of fusion energy, recognising its potential significant benefits in ensuring long-term security and diversity of energy supply. Fusion energy research under the Programme should be implemented in accordance with [the Union’s Fusion Strategy]14 which outlines the actions, notably on research and development, required to advance towards a Union fusion pilot power plant. The strategy seeks a stronger involvement of industry and start-ups and encompasses alternative fusion concepts.(24) The Community should continue to play a key role in the development of fusion energy, recognising its potential significant benefits in ensuring long-term security and diversity of energy supply. Fusion energy research under the Programme should be implemented in accordance with [the Union’s Fusion Strategy]14 which outlines the actions, notably on research and development, required to advance towards a Union fusion pilot power plant. The strategy seeks to strengthen the involvement of established industry from previous generations of fission and fusion technologies, as well as start-ups, and encompasses alternative fission and fusion concepts. Programme should be distributed in a balanced and effective manner across nuclear fission technologies, including SMRs, AMRs and Generation II, III and IV systems, as well as fusion technologies, ensuring that both domains receive adequate and proportionate support in line with their respective research needs, technological maturity and contributions to the Union’s energy, climate and strategic objectives.
14 European Strategy to harness Fusion Energy (COM(YYYY) NNN, DD.MM.YYYY).14 European Strategy to harness Fusion Energy (COM(YYYY) NNN, DD.MM.YYYY).

Or. en

Amendment 158

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 24

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(24) The Community should continue to play a key role in the development of fusion energy, recognising its potential significant benefits in ensuring long-term security and diversity of energy supply. Fusion energy research under the Programme should be implemented in accordance with [the Union’s Fusion Strategy]14 which outlines the actions, notably on research and development, required to advance towards a Union fusion pilot power plant. The strategy seeks a stronger involvement of industry and start-ups and encompasses alternative fusion concepts.(24) The Community should continue to play a key role in the development of fusion energy, recognising its potential significant benefits in ensuring long-term security and diversity of energy supply. Fusion energy research under the Programme should be implemented in accordance with [the Union’s Fusion Strategy]14 which outlines the actions, notably on research and development, required to advance towards a Union fusion pilot power plant. The strategy seeks a stronger involvement of industry and start-ups and encompasses alternative fusion concepts. Its implementation should also support scientific excellence, industrial learning, fair working conditions, skills formation and the timely transfer of knowledge to the European research and industrial base, including start-ups and public research organisations where appropriate.
14 European Strategy to harness Fusion Energy (COM(YYYY) NNN, DD.MM.YYYY).14 European Strategy to harness Fusion Energy (COM(YYYY) NNN, DD.MM.YYYY).

Or. en

Amendment 159

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 24

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(24) The Community should continue to play a key role in the development of fusion energy, recognising its potential significant benefits in ensuring long-term security and diversity of energy supply. Fusion energy research under the Programme should be implemented in accordance with [the Union’s Fusion Strategy]14 which outlines the actions, notably on research and development, required to advance towards a Union fusion pilot power plant. The strategy seeks a stronger involvement of industry and start-ups and encompasses alternative fusion concepts.(24) The Community should continue to play a key role in the development of fusion energy, recognising its potential significant benefits in ensuring long-term security and diversity of energy supply. Fusion energy research under the Programme should be implemented in accordance with [the Union’s Fusion Strategy]14 which outlines the actions, notably on research and development, required to advance towards a Union fusion pilot power plant, and should ensure that European industry and research organisations retain a leading role in the development and commercialisation of fusion technologies.
14 European Strategy to harness Fusion Energy (COM(YYYY) NNN, DD.MM.YYYY).14 European Strategy to harness Fusion Energy (COM(YYYY) NNN, DD.MM.YYYY).

Or. en

Amendment 160

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 25

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(25) In the short- to medium-term, a key step in fusion energy development in the Community is the timely completion of ITER construction and the start of research operations. While this is the responsibility of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization (the ‘ITER Organization’), Euratom bears the largest contribution among international partners, according to the Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the ITER Project (the ‘ITER Agreement’)15 . To ensure a more coherent and streamlined approach to the goals of [the Union’s Fusion Strategy] and the Programme’s objectives, that contribution to the ITER project should come from the Programme’s indicative financial envelope.deleted
15 Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the ITER Project (OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p. 62, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2006/943(1)/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 161

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 25

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(25) In the short- to medium-term, a key step in fusion energy development in the Community is the timely completion of ITER construction and the start of research operations. While this is the responsibility of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization (the ‘ITER Organization’), Euratom bears the largest contribution among international partners, according to the Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the ITER Project (the ‘ITER Agreement’)15 . To ensure a more coherent and streamlined approach to the goals of [the Union’s Fusion Strategy] and the Programme’s objectives, that contribution to the ITER project should come from the Programme’s indicative financial envelope.(25) In the short- to medium-term, a key step in fusion energy development in the Community is the timely completion of ITER construction and the start of research operations. While this is the responsibility of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization (the ‘ITER Organization’), Euratom bears the largest contribution among international partners, according to the Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the ITER Project (the ‘ITER Agreement’)15 . To ensure a more coherent and streamlined approach to the goals of [the Union’s Fusion Strategy] and the Programme’s objectives, that contribution to the ITER project should come from the Programme’s indicative financial envelope. Given the scale of the Union’s financial contribution and the strategic importance of the project, implementation should be accompanied by strong transparency, regular reporting to the European Parliament and the Council, and robust public accountability concerning progress, costs, risks and lessons learnt, without prejudice to applicable security and confidentiality requirements
15 Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the ITER Project (OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p. 62, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2006/943(1)/oj).15 Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the ITER Project (OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p. 62, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2006/943(1)/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 162

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, Radan Kanev, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 25 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(25 a) While the timely completion of ITER is a specific objective of the Programme, Russia's unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine renders its continued participation in strategic Union research projects fundamentally incompatible with the Union's values, interests, and security. The Union should therefore take all available measures to terminate or suspend Russia's involvement in ITER.

Or. en

Amendment 163

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 26

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(26) The Community should also continue the privileged partnership between Euratom and Japan, embedded in the Agreement for the Joint Implementation of the Broader Approach Activities (the ‘Broader Approach Agreement’)16 setting out complementary joint fusion research activities.deleted
16 Agreement between the European Atomic Energy Community and the Government of Japan for the Joint Implementation of the Broader Approach Activities in the Field of Fusion Energy Research (OJ EU L 246, 21.9.2007, p. 34, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2007/614/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 164

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 27

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(27) Article 12(1)(a) of the Statutes of Fusion for Energy contained in Council Decision 2007/198/Euratom17 provides that the Euratom contribution shall be made available through the Community research and training programmes adopted pursuant to Article 7 of the Treaty or through any other decision adopted by the Council.deleted
17 Council Decision 2007/198/Euratom of 27 March 2007 establishing the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy and conferring advantages upon it (OJ L 90, 30.3.2007, p. 58, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2007/198/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 165

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 28

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(28) Council Decision 2007/198/Euratom is not amended by this Regulation and remains to form part, together with the ITER Agreement and the Broader Approach Agreement, of the existing applicable legal framework for ITER.(28) Council Decision 2007/198/Euratom is not amended by this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 166

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 29

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(29) It should also be possible to address the Programme’s objectives through financial instruments, budgetary guarantees and blending operations under Union programmes provided that actions comply with the objectives and rules of such programmes.(29) It should also be possible to address the Programme’s objectives through financial instruments, budgetary guarantees and blending operations under Union programmes provided that actions comply with the objectives and rules of such programmes. In this context, innovative business models should be explored in order to de-risk research and innovation projects, including through blended finance, risk-sharing mechanisms and public–private partnerships, with a view to mobilising private investment and accelerating the deployment of strategic technologies across the Union. Support should, where appropriate, prioritise projects that have identified a credible pathway to market, where Union funding can effectively facilitate industrialisation and scale-up, while preserving fair competition, excellence-based selection and opportunities for early-stage exploratory research.

Or. en

Amendment 167

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 34

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(34) Fusion for Energy uses a distinct financial regulation in line with Article 5 of Council Decision 2007/198/Euratom.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 168

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 37 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(37 a) The recommendations of the European Court of Auditors (ECA) Annual Report 20241 should be fully implemented. The revised project plan for ITER from 2024 sets a new set of baselines to replace those agreed in 2016. The revised plan postpones the end of the ITER assembly phase from 2025 (first plasma) to 2035 (operational start) and the end of the whole project from 2042 to 2059 (17 years later than the current end date). The 2024 baselines also include several important technical changes to the ITER project which may significantly affect the scope for in-kind contributions to F4E and cash contributions to ITER-IO. The estimated financial impact of the 2024 baselines is the main driver for the significant increase in the delivery obligations for the ITER project (“estimate at completion”) from €21.2 billion (end 2023; €21.6 billion in 2024 values) to €25.8 billion (end 2024). This will mean an increase of around €4.2 billion (in 2024 values) in the contributions by Euratom and France to the operational budgets. ECA states that the proposed new baselines have increased the sustainability, legal, technical and economic, and financial risks to the ITER project. Therefore, ECA requires to take adequate account, when identifying risks, of the horizontal risks relating to the revised 2024 baselines and matters of human resources; ECA also demands to enhance Fusion for Energy’s IT tool for risk management so as to have complete information on relevant key risks.

Or. en

Amendment 169

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 38

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(38) The Programme is to be implemented in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council [Performance Regulation]23 which establishes the rules for the expenditure tracking and the performance framework for the budget, including rules for ensuring a uniform application of the principles of ‘do no significant harm’ and gender equality referred to in Article 33(2), points (d) and (f), rules for monitoring and reporting on the performance of Union programmes and activities, rules for establishing a Union funding portal, rules for the evaluation of the programmes, as well as other horizontal provisions applicable to all Union programmes such as those on information, communication and visibility.(38) The Programme is to be implemented in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council [Performance Regulation]23 which establishes the rules for the expenditure tracking and the performance framework for the budget, including rules for ensuring a uniform application of the principles of ‘do no significant harm’ and gender equality referred to in Article 33(2), points (d) and (f), rules for monitoring and reporting on the performance of Union programmes and activities, rules for establishing a Union funding portal, rules for the evaluation of the programmes, as well as other horizontal provisions applicable to all Union programmes such as those on information, communication and visibility.
Member States should consider a substantial increase in the Euratom fission budget, in order to align it with the evolution of Union Framework Programmes and the Union’s climate-policy objectives, while taking into account the current energy context. Increased funding should in particular support activities related to the safe long-term operation (LTO) of nuclear reactors, including both power and research reactors, whose continued safe operation is essential for research, medical isotope production and technological development.
With regard to fusion, funding for ITER should be safeguarded through ring-fenced and predictable allocations, while the scope of Union support should be extended to complementary fusion activities, in order to foster innovation and accelerate progress towards commercially viable fusion energy.
23 Regulation [Performance Regulation].23 Regulation [Performance Regulation].

Or. en

Amendment 170

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 40 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(40 a) In preparing and implementing the Programme, the Commission should facilitate an informed and regular exchange of views with the European Parliament, including on work programmes, strategic priorities, synergies with other Union instruments, the contribution to ITER, and the social, environmental and industrial impacts of supported actions.

Or. en

Amendment 171

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 41

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(41) The advisory procedure set out in Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council should be used for the adoption of the work programmes given the important financial implications of the Programme.(41) The advisory procedure set out in Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council should be used for the adoption of the work programmes given the important financial implications of the Programme and the need to ensure its uniform and transparent application in all Member States. In this context, the involvement of the competent committees will help to strengthen the control exercised by Member States over the Commission’s implementing powers and to ensure that the decisions taken properly reflect the political and budgetary priorities set at Union level. It will also allow for better coordination and cohesion in the implementation of the Programme, increasing efficiency in the use of the financial resources available.

Or. ro

Justification

There is a need to ensure uniform and transparent implementation of the Union work programme in this field in all Member States, based on common criteria for the fulfilment of all the political and budgetary priorities set at Union level.

Amendment 172

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
This Regulation establishes the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Programme’) for the period 2028-2032. It also lays down the objectives of the Programme and its budget for that period including the Community’s contribution to the ITER project, the forms of Union funding and the rules for providing such funding.This Regulation establishes the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Programme’) for the period 2028-2032. It also lays down the objectives of the Programme and its budget for that period including the Community’s contribution to the ITER project, the forms of Union funding and the rules for providing such funding. The Programme shall support policies aimed at reinforcing security of supply, technological competitiveness and strategic autonomy, while respecting Member States’ prerogatives in determining their energy mix. It shall contribute to the development of a competitive nuclear ecosystem, including through the promotion of coordinated Union dialogues, research efforts, licensing harmonisation and industrial strategies supporting deployment and, where appropriate, serial production. The Programme shall also support the development of nuclear skills, address workforce ageing, and contribute to the diversification of nuclear fuel and supply chains in order to reduce strategic dependencies, while ensuring the highest standards of nuclear safety, waste management and technological innovation.

Or. en

Amendment 173

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
This Regulation establishes the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Programme’) for the period 2028-2032. It also lays down the objectives of the Programme and its budget for that period including the Community’s contribution to the ITER project, the forms of Union funding and the rules for providing such funding.This Regulation establishes the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Programme’) for the period 2028-2032. It also lays down the objectives of the Programme and its budget for that period including the Community’s contribution to the ITER project, the forms of Union funding and the rules for providing such funding. The Programme shall be implemented in a manner that strengthens the Union’s scientific, technological and industrial capacities, and contributes to social fairness, skills development, transparency and public accountability.

Or. en

Amendment 174

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
This Regulation establishes the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Programme’) for the period 2028-2032. It also lays down the objectives of the Programme and its budget for that period including the Community’s contribution to the ITER project, the forms of Union funding and the rules for providing such funding.This Regulation establishes the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Programme’) for the period 2028-2032. It also lays down the objectives of the Programme and its budget for that period , the forms of Union funding and the rules for providing such funding.

Or. en

Amendment 175

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. In line with the general and specific objectives of the ECF and Horizon Europe, the Programme shall strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and decarbonisation while protecting people and the environment by advancing research and training in nuclear science and technology in synergy with Union programmes.1. In line with the general and specific objectives of the ECF and Horizon Europe, the Programme shall strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and decarbonisation while protecting people and the environment by advancing research and training in nuclear science and technology in synergy with Union programmes. The Programme shall ensure full technological neutrality, explicitly recognising advanced nuclear fission and advanced fuel technologies as strategic contributors to achieving climate neutrality. Co-funding and cross-eligible calls with Horizon Europe should provide adequate financing for innovative nuclear fission research projects.

Or. en

Amendment 176

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. In line with the general and specific objectives of the ECF and Horizon Europe, the Programme shall strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and decarbonisation while protecting people and the environment by advancing research and training in nuclear science and technology in synergy with Union programmes.1. The Programme shall strengthen the Union's competitiveness, strategic autonomy and energy security while protecting people and the environment by advancing research and innovation and training in nuclear science and technology in synergy with Union programmes and in line with the general and specific objectives of the European Competitiveness Fund and Horizon Europe. Nuclear energy shall be recognised as an essential and irreplaceable contributor to a stable, secure and clean energy supply for the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 177

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. In line with the general and specific objectives of the ECF and Horizon Europe, the Programme shall strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and decarbonisation while protecting people and the environment by advancing research and training in nuclear science and technology in synergy with Union programmes.1. The Programme shall strengthen the Union's competitiveness, strategic autonomy, energy security and decarbonisation while protecting people and the environment by advancing research, innovation and training in nuclear science and technology in synergy with Union programmes and in line with the general and specific objectives of the European Competitiveness Fund and Horizon Europe.

Or. en

Amendment 178

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. In line with the general and specific objectives of the ECF and Horizon Europe, the Programme shall strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and decarbonisation while protecting people and the environment by advancing research and training in nuclear science and technology in synergy with Union programmes.1. In line with the general and specific objectives of the ECF and Horizon Europe, the Programme shall strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and decarbonisation while protecting people and the environment by advancing research and training in nuclear science and technology in synergy with Union programmes, and promoting the public value of Union-supported knowledge and innovation.

Or. en

Amendment 179

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. In line with the general and specific objectives of the ECF and Horizon Europe, the Programme shall strengthen the Union’s competitiveness and decarbonisation while protecting people and the environment by advancing research and training in nuclear science and technology in synergy with Union programmes.1. The general objective of the Programme is to pursue nuclear research and training activities to improve nuclear safety, security and radiation protection, protecting people, workers, nature and the environment.

Or. en

Amendment 180

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) support the construction and operation of ITER, ensuring performance-based funding for the delivery of European components by Fusion for Energy, the integration work by the ITER Organization and that technical and scientific lessons learnt from ITER benefit the Union;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 181

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) advance fusion research, supporting the transition from basic science to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of the Union’s fusion industry, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fusion power plants, and strengthen international cooperation;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 182

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) advance fusion research, supporting the transition from basic science to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of the Union’s fusion industry, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fusion power plants, and strengthen international cooperation;(b) advance fusion research, supporting the transition from basic science to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of the Union’s fusion -related scientific, technological and industrial capacities, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fusion power plants, promote skills development and workforce renewal, and strengthen international cooperation in line with the Union’s strategic interests;

Or. en

Amendment 183

Virgil-Daniel Popescu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) advance fusion research, supporting the transition from basic science to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of the Union’s fusion industry, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fusion power plants, and strengthen international cooperation;(b) advance fusion research, supporting the transition from basic science to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of the Union’s fusion industry, and ensure the mobilisation of all available EU and MS funding sources, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fusion power plants, and strengthen international cooperation;

Or. en

Amendment 184

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) advance fusion research, supporting the transition from basic science to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of the Union’s fusion industry, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fusion power plants, and strengthen international cooperation;(b) advance fusion research, supporting the transition from basic science to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of a competitive European fusion industry and supply chain, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fusion power plants, and strengthen international cooperation with reliable partners;

Or. en

Amendment 185

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) advance fusion research, supporting the transition from basic science to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of the Union’s fusion industry, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fusion power plants, and strengthen international cooperation;(b) advance fusion research, supporting the transition from basic science to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of fusion industry and supply chain, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fusion power plants, and strengthen international cooperation with reliable partners;

Or. en

Amendment 186

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) advance fission research, supporting the safe long-term operation and lifetime extension of existing reactors, as well as the development, demonstration and deployment of Generation II and III technologies, foster innovation in nuclear fuels and fuel-cycle optimisation, strengthen the Union’s industrial base and supply chains, support the modernisation and upgrading of existing infrastructures, and enhance cooperation across Member States to ensure the continuity, safety and competitiveness of the European nuclear fleet, while ensuring the continued research, demonstration and consolidation phases of Generation IV technologies prior to their potential deployment;

Or. en

Amendment 187

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) advance fission research by supporting the development of leading-edge European fission technologies; accelerate the transition from scientific knowledge to engineering, industrial deployment and demonstration; foster the development of a competitive nuclear fission industry and supply chain within the Union; support the involvement of start-ups and research institutions, ensuring that researchers and institutions from all Member States can benefit from and contribute to the actions of the Programme; and strengthen European nuclear fuel cycle autonomy, including the development of alternative fuel solutions reducing dependence on external suppliers;

Or. en

Amendment 188

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) advance fission research, supporting the development of cutting-edge European fission technologies, accelerate the transition from science to engineering and industrial deployment, foster the development of an innovative nuclear fission industry and supply chain within the Union, and support the emergence and scale-up of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling first-of-a-kind small and advanced fission power plants in the Union;

Or. en

Amendment 189

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b b) advance research and innovation for SMRs and AMRs, supporting their development, demonstration and progressive deployment, foster innovation in advanced nuclear fuels and fuel-cycle optimisation, strengthen the Union’s industrial base and supply chains, support the scaling-up of manufacturing capacities and serial production, and enhance cooperation across Member States to ensure the safe, flexible and competitive integration of SMR and AMR technologies into the European energy system;

Or. en

Amendment 190

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(bb) promote the integration of industrial value chains, develop state-of-the-art research infrastructures and attract public and private investment, and strengthen human capital through advanced training and mobility, while fostering collaboration between academia, industry and public authorities to accelerate the transfer of knowledge and findings for use in viable business applications;

Or. ro

Justification

The long-term development of this sector will be problematic without human resources of the requisite professional level.

Amendment 191

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;(c) advance research on nuclear safety, including long-term operation of existing reactors and new build projects, advanced and closed fuel cycles, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the security and resilience of nuclear fuel supply chains — including continuity of supply in conditions of geopolitical disruption or armed conflict —, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;

Or. en

Amendment 192

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel by developing safe, sustainable and efficient long-term solutions, including final geological disposal, reducing waste volume and toxicity, and improving treatment, transport and monitoring processes, and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;

Or. ro

Justification

Efficient management of radioactive waste and spent fuel is essential to ensure long-term environmental protection by developing safe, sustainable and efficient solutions.

Amendment 193

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, security of supply, with a view of achieving total independence from Russian nuclear fuel and technologies, through the development of alternative solutions, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;

Or. en

Amendment 194

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and radioactive spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector and the Programme shall pay particular attention to radiation protection of workers, the general public and the natural environment;

Or. en

Amendment 195

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;(c) advance research on nuclear safety, including long-term operation of existing reactors, advanced fuel cycles, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the security of nuclear fuel supply, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel, and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;

Or. en

Amendment 196

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel, including advanced fuel cycle technologies such as reprocessing and recycling, and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;

Or. en

Amendment 197

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, András Gyürk, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) advance research on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;(c) advance research and innovation on nuclear safety, security and safeguards, non-proliferation, radiation protection, nuclear data, the management of radioactive waste and spent fuel and the innovative use of ionising radiation including in the medical sector;

Or. en

Amendment 198

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) advance fission research, reinforcing the Union's nuclear fission supply chain, bridging the gap between fundamental fission research and applied technology, engineering, and innovation, and fostering start-ups and innovative technologies underpinning advanced fission power plants and associated fuel manufacturing facilities, including through international cooperation;

Or. en

Amendment 199

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) advance research and innovation in nuclear fuels and fuel-cycle optimisation, including the development of innovative fuels, as well as in waste circularity, including the recycling, processing and reuse of radioactive and non-radioactive materials, in order to strengthen resource efficiency, reduce waste generation and enhance the sustainability of the nuclear sector;

Or. en

Amendment 200

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c b) advance research on nuclear security, including the protection of nuclear power plants from incidents and external threats, such as cybersecurity risks and unmanned aerial systems, the prevention and mitigation of radiation risks, and the safety and resilience of waste storage and disposal sites, as well as research on confinement, containment and decontamination technologies, in order to ensure high standards of protection, operational safety and environmental integrity across the nuclear sector;

Or. en

Amendment 201

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) develop, retain and utilise expertise and competencies in the nuclear field through education and training and support access to state-of-the-art research infrastructures, ensuring their long-term sustainability and operational excellence; and(d) develop, attract, retain and utilise expertise and competencies in the nuclear field through education, training and mobility, including through the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, and support broad access to state-of-the-art research infrastructures for researchers and institutions from across the Union, ensuring their long-term sustainability, modernisation and operational excellence; and

Or. en

Amendment 202

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) develop, retain and utilise expertise and competencies in the nuclear field through education and training and support access to state-of-the-art research infrastructures, ensuring their long-term sustainability and operational excellence; and(d) develop, retain and utilise expertise and competencies in the nuclear field through education and training, including doctoral and post-doctoral programmes as well as vocational education and training, and support access to state-of-the-art research infrastructures, ensuring their long-term sustainability and operational excellence; and

Or. en

Amendment 203

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) develop, retain and utilise expertise and competencies in the nuclear field through education and training and support access to state-of-the-art research infrastructures, ensuring their long-term sustainability and operational excellence; and(d) develop, attract, retain and utilise expertise and competencies in the nuclear field through education, training and mobility, including through the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, and support access to state-of-the-art research infrastructures, ensuring their long-term sustainability, modernisation and operational excellence;

Or. en

Amendment 204

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) develop, retain and utilise expertise and competencies in the nuclear field through education and training and support access to state-of-the-art research infrastructures, ensuring their long-term sustainability and operational excellence; and(d) develop, retain and utilise expertise and competencies in the nuclear field through education and training, ensuring the availability of a highly qualified workforce across the Union, and support access to state-of-the-art research infrastructures, ensuring their long-term sustainability and operational excellence; and

Or. en

Amendment 205

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) provide independent and science-based policy support to Union policies and develop the knowledge base for standardisation and modelling.(e) provide independent and science-based policy support to the Union policies and its Member States to develop the knowledge base for standardisation, modelling and metrology, in order to foster greater resource and information sharing within the European Atomic Energy Community.

Or. en

Amendment 206

Georgiana Teodorescu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) advance fission research, supporting the transition from science and concepts to technology, engineering and innovation, foster the development of the Union's nuclear supply chain, support the emergence of start-ups and innovative concepts for enabling future fission power plants, and strenghten international cooperation;

Or. en

Justification

Given nuclear's recognition as a key clean technology to ensure energy sovereignty in Europe, Euratom should support, beyond research on safety, research on innovative nuclear fission solutions, from concept to deployment.

Amendment 207

Marcin Sypniewski

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The horizontal principles set out in Article 5 of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme] shall apply to the Programme.The horizontal principles set out in Article 5 of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme] shall apply to the Programme, with the exception of provisions relating to gender mainstreaming in research and innovation content. The selection of participants, beneficiaries and members of evaluation panels shall be governed solely by the principle of scientific merit and excellence.

Or. en

Amendment 208

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The horizontal principles set out in Article 5 of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme] shall apply to the Programme.The horizontal principles set out in Article 5 of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme] shall apply to the Programme. In addition, the Programme shall be implemented in accordance with the principles of social responsibility, a high level of environmental protection, transparency, public accountability, equal opportunities, gender equality and non-discrimination.

Or. en

Amendment 209

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The horizontal principles set out in Article 5 of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme] shall apply to the Programme.The horizontal principles set out in Article 5 of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme] shall apply to the Programme, with the exception of provisions relating to gender mainstreaming in R&I content.

Or. en

Amendment 210

Tomas Tobé, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The indicative financial envelope of the Programme for the period 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032 shall be EUR 6 682 000 00028 in current prices.1. The indicative financial envelope of the Programme for the period 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032 shall be EUR 7 682 000 00028 in current prices.
28 That indicative financial envelope includes the Programme’s contribution to Fusion for Energy28 That indicative financial envelope includes the Programme’s contribution to Fusion for Energy

Or. en

Amendment 211

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The indicative financial envelope of the Programme for the period 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032 shall be EUR 6 682 000 00028 in current prices.1. The indicative financial envelope of the Programme for the period 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032 shall be EUR 7 806 000 00028 in current prices.
28 That indicative financial envelope includes the Programme’s contribution to Fusion for Energy28 That indicative financial envelope includes the Programme’s contribution to Fusion for Energy

Or. en

Amendment 212

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The indicative financial envelope of the Programme for the period 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032 shall be EUR 6 682 000 00028 in current prices.1. The indicative financial envelope of the Programme for the period 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2032 shall be EUR 2 857 142 857 in current prices.
28 That indicative financial envelope includes the Programme’s contribution to Fusion for Energy

Or. en

Amendment 213

Tomas Tobé, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The indicative distribution of the amount referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be:
a) 51,3% as a contribution to the European Joint Undertaking for ITER
b) 18,3% for indirect actions in fusion
c) 20,8% for indirect actions in fission
d) 9,6% for direct actions by the JRC.

Or. en

Amendment 214

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(1) (5) Nuclear energy technologies shall have access to Union funding instruments under conditions equivalent to those applicable to other net-zero technologies as defined in the Net Zero Industry Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1735.

Or. en

Amendment 215

Christophe Grudler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. The indicative distribution of the amount referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be:
a) 50,7% as a contribution to the European Joint Undertaking for ITER
b) 17,7% for indirect actions in fusion
c) 21,8% for indirect actions in fission
d) 9,8% for direct actions by the JRC.
In accordance with Article 15(3) of the Financial Regulation all decommitments stemming from this Programme or its predecessors shall be re-used in the financial year following the year of decommitment. Those funds shall be recommitted to the same budget line or another budget line of the Programme than the budget line under which the commitments were originally made. Such appropriations shall be made available to those budget lines in addition to the usual budgetary allocations foreseen in the annual budgetary procedure.
The indicative distribution shall be implemented in a manner that ensures adequate and predictable funding for each component of the Programme. The allocation of appropriations shall aim to secure a minimum level of resources for all activities, taking into account their specific objectives, long-term planning requirements and, where relevant, the Union’s international commitments. In particular, the Union contribution to the European Joint Undertaking for ITER shall be ensured in line with those commitments and with the need to guarantee continuity of the project. The specific amount for ITER within the Euratom Programme shall be guaranteed and remain earmarked in the general budget.

Or. en

Amendment 216

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the amounts of additional resources referred to in Article 6 may also be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Programme, such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, information technology systems and platforms, information and communication activities, including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, and all other technical and administrative assistance or staff-related expenses incurred by the Commission for the management of the Programme.2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the amounts of additional resources referred to in Article 6 may also be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Programme, such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, information technology systems and platforms, information and communication activities, including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, and all other technical and administrative assistance or staff-related expenses incurred by the Commission for the management of the Programme, including the collection of data necessary for monitoring social, skills-related, environmental and dissemination-related outcomes of supported actions.

Or. en

Amendment 217

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the amounts of additional resources referred to in Article 6 may also be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Programme, such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, information technology systems and platforms, information and communication activities, including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, and all other technical and administrative assistance or staff-related expenses incurred by the Commission for the management of the Programme.2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the amounts of additional resources referred to in Article 6 may also be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Programme, such as preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, information technology systems and platforms, information and communication activities, including corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union, and all other technical and administrative assistance or staff-related expenses incurred by the Commission for the management of the Programme, provided that the total budget allocated to such expenditures shall not exceed 5% of the Programme’s overall financial envelope.

Or. en

Amendment 218

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The share of Union participation in the Programme allocated to ITER shall be ring-fenced and ensured through dedicated and predictable funding, and shall not be subject to reallocation, flexibility or fungibility within the Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 219

Virgil-Daniel Popescu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Member States, Union institutions, bodies and agencies, third countries, international organisations, international financial institutions, or other third parties, may make additional financial or non-financial contributions to the Programme. Additional financial contributions shall constitute external assigned revenue within the meaning of Article 21(2), points (a), (d), or (e) or Article 21(5) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.1. Member States, Union institutions, bodies and agencies, third countries, international organisations, international financial institutions, or other third parties, may make additional financial or non-financial contributions to the Programme, including through the coordinated mobilisation of all available national resources and EU financial instruments to support investments in nuclear technologies and energy generation capacities. Additional financial contributions shall constitute external assigned revenue within the meaning of Article 21(2), points (a), (d), or (e) or Article 21(5) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.

Or. en

Amendment 220

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Programme shall be implemented in synergy with other Union programmes. An action that has received a Union contribution from another programme may also receive a contribution under this Programme. The rules of the relevant Union programme shall apply to the corresponding contribution or a single set of rules may be applied to all contributions and a single legal commitment may be concluded. If the Union contribution is based on eligible cost, the cumulative support from the Union budget shall not exceed the total eligible costs of the action and may be calculated on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the documents setting out the conditions for support.1. The Programme shall be implemented in synergy with other Union programmes. An action that has received a Union contribution from another programme may also receive a contribution under this Programme. The rules of the relevant Union programme shall apply to the corresponding contribution or a single set of rules may be applied to all contributions and a single legal commitment may be concluded. If the Union contribution is based on eligible cost, the cumulative support from the Union budget shall not exceed the total eligible costs of the action and may be calculated on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the documents setting out the conditions for support. Other Union programmes may include, inter alia, Horizon Europe and its successor programmes, the European Competitiveness Fund, InvestEU, the Connecting Europe Facility, the EU4Health Programme, the Modernisation Fund, the Innovation Fund, the Nuclear Safety and Decommissioning Programmes, the Digital Europe Programme, the European Defence Fund, the Global Europe – Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument, as well as relevant initiatives and policy frameworks, including the Clean Industrial Deal, the Net-Zero Industry Act, the Critical Raw Materials Act and the Electrification Action Plan.

Or. en

Amendment 221

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Programme shall be implemented in synergy with other Union programmes. An action that has received a Union contribution from another programme may also receive a contribution under this Programme. The rules of the relevant Union programme shall apply to the corresponding contribution or a single set of rules may be applied to all contributions and a single legal commitment may be concluded. If the Union contribution is based on eligible cost, the cumulative support from the Union budget shall not exceed the total eligible costs of the action and may be calculated on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the documents setting out the conditions for support.1. The Programme shall be implemented in synergy with other Union programmes. An action that has received a Union contribution from another programme may also receive a contribution under this Programme. The Commission shall ensure that such synergies are reflected in work programmes, calls and implementation arrangements in order to facilitate pathways from research and training to demonstration, scale-up and uptake, while avoiding duplication of support The rules of the relevant Union programme shall apply to the corresponding contribution or a single set of rules may be applied to all contributions and a single legal commitment may be concluded. If the Union contribution is based on eligible cost, the cumulative support from the Union budget shall not exceed the total eligible costs of the action and may be calculated on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the documents setting out the conditions for support.

Or. en

Amendment 222

Virgil-Daniel Popescu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Programme shall be implemented in synergy with other Union programmes. An action that has received a Union contribution from another programme may also receive a contribution under this Programme. The rules of the relevant Union programme shall apply to the corresponding contribution or a single set of rules may be applied to all contributions and a single legal commitment may be concluded. If the Union contribution is based on eligible cost, the cumulative support from the Union budget shall not exceed the total eligible costs of the action and may be calculated on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the documents setting out the conditions for support.1. The Programme shall be implemented in synergy with other Union programmes and shall enable e combined use of all EU and MS funding instruments to support investments across the full value chain, including energy generation capacity. An action that has received a Union contribution from another programme may also receive a contribution under this Programme. The rules of the relevant Union programme shall apply to the corresponding contribution or a single set of rules may be applied to all contributions and a single legal commitment may be concluded. If the Union contribution is based on eligible cost, the cumulative support from the Union budget shall not exceed the total eligible costs of the action and may be calculated on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the documents setting out the conditions for support.

Or. en

Amendment 223

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may finance actions to which a Competitiveness Seal was awarded.4. Member States may finance actions to which a Competitiveness Seal was awarded. Projects awarded under the Programme may benefit from specific treatment under Union rules on State aid, innovation support and public procurement, in order to facilitate their development, scale-up and deployment, while ensuring fair competition and compliance with the applicable regulatory framework.

Or. en

Amendment 224

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) other third countries.(c) other third countries, provided that they comply with the relevant EU provisions.

Or. ro

Amendment 225

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) where relevant, ensure the protection of security and public order interests of the Union.(e) where relevant, ensure the protection of security and public order interests of the Union and therefore be restricted to third countries that share European values and do not exert hostility towards the European Union.

Or. en

Amendment 226

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) where relevant, ensure the protection of security and public order interests of the Union.(e) where relevant, ensure the protection of security and public order interests of the Union, as well as data security and protection, including access to data for clearly-defined periods of time.

Or. ro

Justification

Data protection is necessary in all fields, and ensuring security in the field of research is vital at all stages of the research process.

Amendment 227

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) ensure that participation is consistent with the Union’s economic security interests, by requiring a nuanced, purpose-driven approach to cooperation, based on reciprocity, mutual benefit and fair business practices, and including appropriate safeguards to prevent unwanted technology transfer, intellectual property misappropriation and risks to the Union’s strategic autonomy.

Or. en

Amendment 228

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) a good capacity in science, technology and innovation;(a) a good capacity in science, technology and innovation, particularly as regards having a highly skilled workforce that can adapt to the requirements in this field;

Or. ro

Justification

Cooperation of this kind will not be possible without a highly skilled workforce that can adapt to the requirements in this field.

Amendment 229

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) commitment to a rules-based open market economy, including fair and equitable dealing with intellectual property rights, respect of human rights, backed by democratic institutions;(b) commitment to a rules-based open market economy, including fair and equitable dealing with intellectual property rights, respect of human rights and international law, backed by democratic institutions;

Or. en

Amendment 230

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) commitment to a rules-based open market economy, including fair and equitable dealing with intellectual property rights, respect of human rights, backed by democratic institutions;(b) commitment to a rules-based open market economy, including fair, equitable and protected dealing with intellectual property rights, respect of human rights, backed by democratic institutions;

Or. ro

Amendment 231

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) active promotion of policies to improve the economic and social well-being of citizens.(c) legal frameworks aligned with Union standards on technology transfer, the protection of intellectual property, the prevention of misappropriation, and the promotion of fair and balanced practices, ensuring reciprocity and safeguarding the Union’s economic security interests.

Or. en

Amendment 232

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The scope of association of each third country to the Programme shall take into account an analysis of the risks, notably those likely to affect the Union’s public order and security in relevant policy areas, including economic and research security, as well as benefits and the broader objective of driving economic growth and competitiveness of the Union through innovation. Accordingly, acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidate countries and third countries may be excluded from parts of the Programme in accordance with this Regulation or the association agreement itself.5. The scope of association of each third country to the Programme shall take into account an analysis of the risks, notably those likely to affect the Union’s public order and security in relevant policy areas, including economic and research security, as well as benefits and the broader objective of driving economic growth and competitiveness of the Union through innovation. Accordingly, acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidate countries and third countries may be excluded from parts of the Programme in accordance with this Regulation or the association agreement itself. Such exclusion may be justified, where duly necessary and proportionate, in order to safeguard the Union’s strategic assets, interests, autonomy and security, including risks related to foreign interference, unwanted technology transfer, intellectual property misappropriation, or threats to public order and security, in accordance with the applicable provisions of Union law and the conditions set out in the Programme and the relevant association agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 233

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The scope of association of each third country to the Programme shall take into account an analysis of the risks, notably those likely to affect the Union’s public order and security in relevant policy areas, including economic and research security, as well as benefits and the broader objective of driving economic growth and competitiveness of the Union through innovation. Accordingly, acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidate countries and third countries may be excluded from parts of the Programme in accordance with this Regulation or the association agreement itself.5. The scope of association of each third country to the Programme shall take into account an analysis of the risks, notably those likely to affect the Union’s public order and security in relevant policy areas, including economic and research security, supply chain resilience as well as benefits and the broader objective of driving economic growth and competitiveness of the Union through innovation. Accordingly, acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidate countries and third countries may be excluded from parts of the Programme or made subject to specific safeguards concerning access to sensitive information, infrastructures, technologies, data or results in accordance with this Regulation or the association agreement itself.

Or. en

Amendment 234

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The scope of association of each third country to the Programme shall take into account an analysis of the risks, notably those likely to affect the Union’s public order and security in relevant policy areas, including economic and research security, as well as benefits and the broader objective of driving economic growth and competitiveness of the Union through innovation. Accordingly, acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidate countries and third countries may be excluded from parts of the Programme in accordance with this Regulation or the association agreement itself.5. The scope of association of each third country to the Programme shall take into account an analysis of the risks, notably those likely to affect the Union's public order and security in relevant policy areas, including economic and research security and the integrity of the European nuclear supply chain, as well as benefits and the broader objective of driving economic growth and competitiveness of the Union through innovation. Accordingly, all categories of third countries referred to in paragraph 1 may be excluded from parts of the Programme in accordance with this Regulation or the association agreement itself.

Or. en

Amendment 235

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The scope of association of each third country to the Programme shall take into account an analysis of the risks, notably those likely to affect the Union’s public order and security in relevant policy areas, including economic and research security, as well as benefits and the broader objective of driving economic growth and competitiveness of the Union through innovation. Accordingly, acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidate countries and third countries may be excluded from parts of the Programme in accordance with this Regulation or the association agreement itself.5. The scope of association of each third country to the Programme shall take into account an analysis of the risks, notably those likely to affect the Union’s public order and security in relevant policy areas, including military, energy, economic and research security, as well as benefits and the broader objective of driving economic growth and competitiveness of the Union through innovation. Accordingly, acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidate countries and third countries may be excluded from parts of the Programme in accordance with this Regulation or the association agreement itself.

Or. en

Amendment 236

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Union funding may be provided in any form in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, in particular grants, prizes, procurement, non-financial donations and financial instruments.2. Union funding may be provided in any form in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, in particular grants, prizes, procurement, non-financial donations and financial instruments. Within the indicative financial envelope referred to in Article 5, not less than 50% shall be implemented in the form of grants.

Or. en

Amendment 237

Tomas Tobé, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Union funding may be provided in any form in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, in particular grants, prizes, procurement, non-financial donations and financial instruments.2. At least 50% of Union funding under the Programme shall be provided through grants. Additional funding may be provided in any other form in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, including prizes, procurement, non-financial donations, and financial instruments.

Or. en

Amendment 238

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Where Union funding is provided in the form of a grant, funding shall be provided as financing not linked to costs or as simplified cost options in particular through lump sums as well as unit costs for personnel, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Funding may be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement only where the objectives of an action cannot be achieved otherwise. Where it is necessary to enable other sources of funding including co-investments with national resources subject to State aid rules, funding shall be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement or simplified cost options.6. Where Union funding is provided in the form of a grant, funding shall be provided as financing not linked to costs or as simplified cost options in particular through lump sums as well as unit costs for personnel, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Funding may be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement where justified by the nature of the action, including for large-scale experimental programmes and research infrastructure projects.Where it is necessary to enable other sources of funding including co-investments with national resources subject to State aid rules, funding shall be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement or simplified cost options.

Or. en

Amendment 239

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Where Union funding is provided in the form of a grant, funding shall be provided as financing not linked to costs or as simplified cost options in particular through lump sums as well as unit costs for personnel, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Funding may be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement only where the objectives of an action cannot be achieved otherwise. Where it is necessary to enable other sources of funding including co-investments with national resources subject to State aid rules, funding shall be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement or simplified cost options.6. Where Union funding is provided in the form of a grant, funding may be provided as financing not linked to costs or as simplified cost options in particular through lump sums as well as unit costs for personnel, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. Funding may be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement where duly justified by the beneficiary, in particular in light of its financial capacity. Where it is necessary to enable other sources of funding including co-investments with national resources subject to State aid rules, funding shall be provided in the form of actual eligible cost reimbursement or simplified cost options.

Or. en

Amendment 240

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. For the purposes of Article 153(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the evaluation committee may be composed partially or fully of independent external experts.7. For the purposes of Article 153(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, the evaluation committee may be composed partially or fully of independent external experts, selected through an open, transparent and merit-based process, based on a broad and competitive call for participation extending beyond Commission expert groups and registered interest representatives, ensuring excellence, independence and legitimacy, including:
(a) nominations proposed by competent ministerial authorities of the Member States;
(b) nominations proposed through a structured process by individual universities or groupings of universities, including European university alliances;
(c) self-nominations submitted in response to an open and competitive call for candidates.

Or. en

Amendment 241

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7 a. The European Parliament shall be informed in a timely manner of these nominations and shall organise public hearings, including joint hearings, prior to their appointment, followed by a confirmation vote by the competent committee. After their appointment, the European Parliament shall engage in regular structured dialogue with the experts throughout their mandate.

Or. en

Amendment 242

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Where necessary to achieve the objectives set out in Article 3, activities under this Regulation may be implemented through European Partnerships under paragraphs 2 to 6 of this Article, by default through the work programmes, or through Euratom co-funded partnerships under paragraph 7 of this Article.1. As soon as the required number of Member States to establish a European Partnership agree on a memorandum of understanding aligned with the objectives set out in Article 3, activities under this Regulation may be implemented through European Partnerships under paragraphs 2 to 6 of this Article, by default through the work programmes, or through Euratom co-funded partnerships under paragraph 7 of this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 243

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) the results to be delivered, which shall be clear, measurable, time-bound;(a) the results to be delivered, which shall be clear, measurable, time-bound, and flanked with actions to disseminate research results and strengthen the link between science and society, with a view to harnessing the findings for the benefit of the economy and society as a whole;

Or. ro

Justification

Research cannot exist without the proper dissemination and application of results and strengthening of the link between science and society, with a view to harnessing the results for the benefit of the economy.

Amendment 244

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) reporting requirements;(b) regular reporting requirements;

Or. ro

Amendment 245

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) the related commitments from all partners;(c) the related commitments from all partners, including on data protection and security for the entire duration of the commitments;

Or. ro

Amendment 246

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) be established only in cases where Union action alone or other forms of support under the Programme cannot achieve the desired objectives.(a) be established as soon as an adequate number of Member States agree to share resources and jointly endorse a project through a memorandum of understanding aligned with the objectives of the Programme;

Or. en

Amendment 247

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point c – point i (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) reinforce transnational access to research infrastructures across domains and sectors, adapt to new emerging user communities and have a highly skilled and adaptable workforce;

Or. ro

Amendment 248

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) be selected in a transparent manner based on a set of quantifiable lifecycle criteria and a strong portfolio approach, resulting in a coherent set of initiatives.(d) be selected in a transparent manner based on a set of quantifiable lifecycle criteria and a strong portfolio approach, resulting in a coherent set of initiatives, or, where appropriate, as a single project requiring the combination of several technological building blocks and the coordination of multiple industrial, research and public actors;

Or. en

Amendment 249

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. All partners in European Partnerships other than the Union shall provide information on the structure, membership and activities developed within the partnership. In cases where partnerships are concluded with representative organisations and associations, this shall include regular information on their membership.6. All partners in European Partnerships other than the Union shall provide information on the structure, membership and activities developed within the partnership, including a regularly updated list of persons having access to all the respective data and the access period. In cases where partnerships are concluded with representative organisations and associations, this shall include regular information on their membership.

Or. ro

Justification

Data security throughout the partnership is essential for the smooth running of the partnership programmes.

Amendment 250

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. Euratom co-funded partnerships may be funded through grants awarded to consortia comprising a core of legal entities established or designated by Member States and by any third country associated to the Euratom Programme that will develop a joint programme of R&I and coordination and support activities, including potentially the organisation of joint open calls. The work programmes referred to in Article 13 shall define the scope of Euratom co-funded partnerships, the funding rate enabling appropriate co-financing by the partners and the potential participation of entities other than those established or designated by Member States and by any third country associated to the Euratom Programme. Euratom co-funded partnerships may also support the objectives of European Partnerships established under paragraph 2 as well as international cooperation in their respective field.7. Euratom co-funded partnerships may be funded through grants awarded to consortia comprising a core of legal entities established or designated by Member States and by any third country associated to the Euratom Programme that will develop a joint programme of R&I and coordination and support activities, including potentially the organisation of joint open calls. The work programmes referred to in Article 13 shall define the scope of Euratom co-funded partnerships, the funding rate enabling appropriate co-financing by the partners and the potential participation of entities other than those established or designated by Member States and by any third country associated to the Euratom Programme. Euratom co-funded partnerships may also support the objectives of European Partnerships established under paragraph 2 as well as international cooperation in their respective field. A balanced allocation of funding between partnerships and open calls for Research and Innovation Actions shall be ensured to promote novel and innovative approaches beyond the scope of existing partnerships.

Or. en

Amendment 251

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7 a. In addition to mobilising private investment in fusion energy, any public–private partnership proposed to support the deployment of fusion technologies should not reduce or reallocate the existing budget of the Euratom Research and Training Programme dedicated to ITER, in order to preserve support for its core priorities and ongoing research activities.

Or. en

Amendment 252

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article10a
The Commission shall support Member States in establishing streamlined, predictable and time-efficient pre-licensing and licensing procedures for nuclear installations, including advanced reactors and small modular reactors, to facilitate the deployment of SMRs and AMRs by the early 2030s.

Or. en

Amendment 253

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The JRC shall provide independent, evidence-based knowledge and science, supporting EU policies to positively impact society. This shall be undertaken through JRC direct actions and through participation of the JRC in indirect actions. Chapter II of Title II of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme] shall not apply to direct actions.The JRC shall provide independent, evidence-based knowledge and science, supporting EU policies to positively impact society. Where relevant, the JRC shall also support transparency and accountability in the implementation of the Programme by contributing to the development of evidence, indicators, methodologies and public reporting tools, including for the information of the European Parliament and the Council. This shall be undertaken through JRC direct actions and through participation of the JRC in indirect actions. Chapter II of Title II of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme] shall not apply to direct actions.

Or. en

Amendment 254

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. By way of derogation from Article 32(g) of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme], a beneficiary that has received Community funding shall grant access to its results on a royalty-free basis to the Union institutions, bodies, offices, agencies or Fusion for Energy, for the purpose of developing, implementing and monitoring Community policies and programmes or obligations under international cooperation with third countries and international organisations. Such access rights shall include the right to authorise third parties to use the results in public procurement and the right to sub-license. Access rights shall be limited to non-commercial and non-competitive use.3. By way of derogation from Article 32(g) of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme], a beneficiary that has received Community funding shall grant access to its results on a royalty-free basis to the Union institutions, bodies, offices, agencies or Fusion for Energy, for the purpose of developing, implementing and monitoring Community policies and programmes or obligations under international cooperation with third countries and international organisations. Such access rights shall include the right to authorise third parties to use the results in public procurement and the right to sub-license. Access rights shall be limited to non-commercial and non-competitive use. By way of exception, where duly justified on grounds of economic security, including risks related to unwanted technology transfer, intellectual property misappropriation or threats to the Union’s strategic autonomy, such access may be restricted, conditioned or withheld, subject to appropriate safeguards.

Or. en

Amendment 255

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. By way of derogation from Article 32(g) of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme], a beneficiary that has received Community funding shall grant access to its results on a royalty-free basis to the Union institutions, bodies, offices, agencies or Fusion for Energy, for the purpose of developing, implementing and monitoring Community policies and programmes or obligations under international cooperation with third countries and international organisations. Such access rights shall include the right to authorise third parties to use the results in public procurement and the right to sub-license. Access rights shall be limited to non-commercial and non-competitive use.3. By way of derogation from Article 32(g) of Regulation [establishing the Horizon Europe Framework Programme], a beneficiary that has received Community funding shall grant access to its results on a royalty-free basis to the Union institutions, bodies, offices, agencies or Fusion for Energy, for the purpose of developing, implementing and monitoring Community policies and programmes or obligations under international cooperation with third countries and international organisations. Such access rights shall include the right to use the results in public procurement. The right to sub-license shall be limited to cases where it is strictly necessary for the implementation of Union policies and shall not undermine the commercial interests of the beneficiary. Access rights shall be limited to non-commercial and non-competitive use.

Or. en

Amendment 256

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Without prejudice to these provisions, where results generated with Union funding are commercially exploited, appropriate mechanisms may be established to ensure a fair return on investment for the Union, including through revenue-sharing arrangements, reinvestment obligations or other forms of financial or non-financial payback, in line with the applicable Union rules on intellectual property, State aid and competition.

Or. en

Amendment 257

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Programme shall be implemented by work programmes referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article in accordance with Article 110 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 and, for the Programme’s contribution to the ITER project, in the financial regulation of Fusion for Energy.The Programme shall be implemented by work programmes referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article in accordance with Article 110 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.

Or. en

Amendment 258

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) actions to which specific rules apply, in particular on ownership of results, valorisation and dissemination, transfer and licensing as well as access rights to results.(e) actions to which specific rules apply, in particular on ownership of results, valorisation and dissemination, transfer and licensing as well as access rights to results. Such rules shall ensure that results generated by European entities are not transferred to third-country entities in a manner that would undermine the Union's strategic autonomy or competitive advantage in the nuclear field.

Or. en

Amendment 259

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The second subparagraph shall not apply to the work programmes referred to in Council Decision 2007/198/Euratom.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 260

Tsvetelina Penkova, Eero Heinäluoma

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the work programmes implementing the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2) and the activities set out in the Annex. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3).2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the work programmes implementing the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2) and the activities set out in the Annex. In preparing those work programmes, the Commission shall ensure coherence with relevant Union policy objectives and may consult, where appropriate, scientific bodies, social partners, industry, research organisations, education and training providers, civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3).

Or. en

Amendment 261

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the work programmes implementing the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2) and the activities set out in the Annex. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3).2. The Commission shall, by means of the ordinary legislative procedure, adopt the work programmes implementing the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2) and the activities set out in the Annex. Those work programmes shall cover, inter alia, activities in the fields of health, fusion, fission, waste management, reprocessing and circularity, nuclear safety and security, frontier research, miniaturisation and advanced reactor technologies, as well as the securing of raw materials and critical inputs for the nuclear value chain.

Or. en

Amendment 262

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the work programmes implementing the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2) and the activities set out in the Annex. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3).2. The Commission shall, by means of delegated acts, adopt the work programmes implementing the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2) and the activities set out in the Annex. Those delegated acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3).

Or. en

Amendment 263

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The Commission shall adopt separate, multi-annual work programmes, by means of implementing acts, for the implementation of actions under the JRC. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3). The multi-annual work programmes shall take into account the opinion provided by the Board of Governors of the JRC referred to in Decision 96/282/Euratom.3. The Commission shall adopt separate, multi-annual work programmes for the implementation of actions under the JRC by means of implementing acts, in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3). Those implementing acts shall be subject to enhanced scrutiny by the European Parliament and the Council, which shall be fully and timely informed at all stages of their preparation, including through the prior transmission of draft work programmes, detailed justifications, impact assessments and any relevant supporting documents. The European Parliament and the Council shall be given sufficient time to examine those drafts and to express their views, which the Commission shall duly take into account before adoption. Where either institution raises duly reasoned objections, the Commission shall review the draft act and provide a reasoned response. The multi-annual work programmes shall take into account the opinion provided by the Board of Governors of the JRC referred to in Decision 96/282/Euratom.

Or. en

Amendment 264

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The Commission shall adopt separate, multi-annual work programmes, by means of implementing acts, for the implementation of actions under the JRC. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3). The multi-annual work programmes shall take into account the opinion provided by the Board of Governors of the JRC referred to in Decision 96/282/Euratom.3. The Commission shall adopt separate, multi-annual work programmes, by means of delegated acts, for the implementation of actions under the JRC. Those delegated acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3). The multi-annual work programmes shall take into account the opinion provided by the Board of Governors of the JRC referred to in Decision 96/282/Euratom.

Or. en

Amendment 265

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 and shall operate in accordance with principles of transparency, independence and accountability, with appropriate safeguards to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure a balanced and representative composition based on proven expertise, while guaranteeing the protection of the Union’s strategic, security and economic interests.

Or. en

Amendment 266

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) Fission: Strategic overview of the implementation of Fission actions(a) Fission: Strategic overview of the implementation of Fission actions, including:
(i) existing and previous generations of nuclear installations, including lifetime extension, long-term operation and deployment;
(ii) new generations of nuclear technologies, including large-scale power plants, Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), including their development, demonstration and deployment;

Or. en

Amendment 267

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) Fission: Strategic overview of the implementation of Fission actions(a) Decommissioning : Strategic overview of the implementation of decommissioning actions

Or. en

Amendment 268

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) Fusion: Strategic overview of the implementation of Fusion actions(b) Fusion: Strategic overview of the implementation of Fusion actions, including:
(i) ITER-related activities, including construction, operation and associated research and innovation;
(ii) non-ITER fusion activities, including alternative technological pathways, public–private partnerships and emerging concepts, covering research, innovation, demonstration and deployment;
(iii) enabling and cross-cutting technologies supporting fusion development and future deployment, including research, innovation, demonstration and deployment;

Or. en

Amendment 269

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) Fusion: Strategic overview of the implementation of Fusion actions(b) Safety: Strategic overview of the implementation of nuclear safety and security actions

Or. en

Amendment 270

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) A joint configuration covering cross-cutting matters, including skills development, nuclear supply chain resilience and synergies between fission and fusion research.

Or. en

Amendment 271

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Safety, security and resilience: Strategic overview of the implementation of actions related to nuclear safety, security and system resilience, including:
(i) safety: research, innovation, demonstration and deployment aimed at ensuring the highest standards of nuclear safety, including accident prevention, safety assessment methodologies, ageing management and long-term operation of nuclear installations;
(ii) security: protection of nuclear installations, materials and infrastructures against internal and external threats, including cybersecurity risks, malicious acts and unmanned aerial systems, as well as the prevention and mitigation of radiation risks;
(iii) resilience: strengthening the robustness and adaptability of nuclear systems and infrastructures, including preparedness and response to natural hazards, climate-related risks, supply disruptions and crisis situations, ensuring continuity of operations and protection of critical functions;

Or. en

Amendment 272

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 b. Atoms for health: Strategic overview of the implementation of nuclear applications in the health sector, including:
(i) the development, production and supply security of medical radioisotopes;
(ii) research, innovation, demonstration and deployment of nuclear technologies for diagnosis, treatment and imaging, including radiotherapy, nuclear medicine and advanced imaging techniques;
(iii) the strengthening of European capacities, infrastructures and skills in nuclear medicine, including support for hospitals, research centres and industrial actors;

Or. en

Amendment 273

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 c. Integration of nuclear energy into energy systems and grids: Strategic overview of the implementation of actions supporting the integration of nuclear energy into electricity systems and networks, including:
(i) the role of nuclear energy as a source of dispatchable low-carbon electricity contributing to grid stability, security of supply and system adequacy;
(ii) the integration of nuclear generation with variable renewable energy sources, including system flexibility, load-following capabilities and hybrid energy systems;
(iii) the development of supporting infrastructures and technologies, including grid connections, digitalisation, smart systems and sector coupling applications;

Or. en

Amendment 274

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 d (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 d. Key enabling technologies and transversal applications: Strategic overview of the implementation of actions supporting the development of key enabling technologies for the nuclear sector, including:
(i) advanced manufacturing technologies, including industrialisation processes, serial production, and advanced materials and components for nuclear systems;
(ii) innovative nuclear fuels and fuel-cycle optimisation, including research, innovation, demonstration and deployment of advanced fuels supporting performance, safety and resource efficiency;
(iii) digitalisation and smart technologies, including artificial intelligence, digital twins, advanced instrumentation and control systems, and data-driven solutions supporting operation, safety, maintenance and optimisation of nuclear installations;
(iv) decarbonisation of industrial processes, industrial facilities and technological infrastructures, including through the use of nuclear-generated heat and electricity, in particular via Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), as well as through technologies enabling sector coupling applications such as hydrogen production, district heating and cooling, and integration with energy-intensive industries, including chemicals, steel, refining and manufacturing;

Or. en

Amendment 275

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Where the opinion of the committee is to be obtained by written procedure, that procedure shall be terminated without result when, within the time-limit for delivery of the opinion, the chair of the committee so decides or a simple majority of committee members so request.4. Where the opinion of the committee is to be obtained by written procedure, that procedure shall be terminated without result when, within the time-limit for delivery of the opinion, the chair of the committee so decides or a simple majority of committee members so request. The European Parliament and the Council shall be fully and timely informed of the initiation, progress and outcome of any written procedure, including the transmission of all relevant documents. They shall be given the opportunity to examine and express their views, which the Commission shall duly take into account.

Or. en

Amendment 276

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. In accordance with international agreements concluded by the Union, representatives of third countries or international organisations may be invited as observers in the meetings of the committee under the conditions laid down in its rules of procedure, taking into account security and public order of the Union or its Member States.5. In accordance with international agreements concluded by the Union, representatives of third countries or international organisations may be invited as observers in the meetings of the committee under the conditions laid down in its rules of procedure, taking into account security and public order of the Union or its Member States. Their participation shall be subject to appropriate safeguards, including confidentiality requirements, rules on conflicts of interest, and measures to prevent undue influence, unwanted technology transfer or risks to the Union’s strategic, economic and security interests.

Or. en

Amendment 277

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – subheading 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Specific objectives 2(a) and 2(b)deleted

Or. en

Amendment 278

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
In relation to fusion, the scope of the Programme is the implementation of the EU Fusion Strategy, including ITER construction and operation, the Broader Approach and IFMIF/DONES. The Programme will be implemented through a combination of complementary fusion research activities and relevant EU instruments, effective involvement of industry and other stakeholders and support to the emergence and development of startups.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 279

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point i

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) maintain EU leadership in the ITER project by active participation in its governance and supervising Fusion for Energy, in particular for timely delivery of EU components as in-kind contributions;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 280

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point ii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ii) continue collaboration with the ITER Organization and partners to ITER related activities;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 281

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point iii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(iii) support research and innovation to close the key technology gaps standing in the way of the realisation of fusion pilot power plants;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 282

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point iii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(iii) support research and innovation to close the key technology gaps standing in the way of the realisation of fusion pilot power plants;(iii) promote integrated and interdisciplinary approaches combining scientific research, technological innovation and public policies in the field, and support research and innovation to close the key technology gaps standing in the way of the realisation of fusion pilot power plants;

Or. ro

Amendment 283

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point iii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(iii) support research and innovation to close the key technology gaps standing in the way of the realisation of fusion pilot power plants;(iii) support research, innovation, demonstration and deployment in innovative fuels and fuel-cycle optimisation, as well as in new and advanced reactor designs, in order to address key technological gaps and facilitate the realisation and deployment of fusion and fission pilot power plants;

Or. en

Amendment 284

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point iv

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(iv) exploit existing fusion facilities and contribute to the design and development of future facilities in the EU, relying on lessons learned from ITER;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 285

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point v

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(v) support an effective involvement of industry, aiming to develop fusion technologies, to advance mature technologies towards market readiness, to create business opportunities and to consolidate a European fusion supply chain;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 286

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point vi

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(vi) widen support to include inertial confinement fusion, while keeping focus on magnetic confinement as the most mature approach;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 287

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point vi

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(vi) widen support to include inertial confinement fusion, while keeping focus on magnetic confinement as the most mature approach;(vi) support inertial confinement fusion, while keeping focus on magnetic confinement as the most mature approach;

Or. en

Amendment 288

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point vii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(vii) support European fusion startups to scale up and attract private investments in the EU;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 289

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point vii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(vii) support European fusion startups to scale up and attract private investments in the EU;(vii) support European fusion startups to scale up and attract private investments in the EU, including support for early-career researchers, and their bold initiatives and ideas that can drive forward research in the field;

Or. ro

Amendment 290

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point viii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(viii) build competence and skills on fusion energy in the EU and implement a focussed and coordinated education and training programme in addition to activities mentioned under specific objective 2(d);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 291

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point viii

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(viii) build competence and skills on fusion energy in the EU and implement a focussed and coordinated education and training programme in addition to activities mentioned under specific objective 2(d);(viii) build competence and skills on fusion energy in the EU and implement a focussed and coordinated education and training programme in addition to activities mentioned under specific objective 2(d), enabling the training of a highly skilled and adaptable workforce capable of responding to global challenges and the needs of the European economy;

Or. ro

Amendment 292

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – paragraph 3 – point ix

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ix) support scientific and technological collaboration in the framework of Euratom’s international bilateral agreements and other relevant international cooperation schemes.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 293

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – subheading 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Specific objective 2(c)Specific objective 2(a)

Or. en

Amendment 294

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – subheading 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) restore and consolidate European technological leadership in nuclear fission by advancing research and innovation; (ii) reinforce the Union’s nuclear fission supply chain by supporting the development, qualification and deployment of key components, materials and manufacturing processes required for advanced fission power plants; (iii) bridge the gap between fundamental fission research and applied technology by supporting pre-commercial demonstration projects, prototype development and first-of-a-kind installations of innovative fission reactor designs, including SMRs and AMRs; (iv) enable European fission startups, SMEs, and innovative industrial actors to develop and commercialise advanced fission technologies, including through access to research infrastructures and connections to private capital; (v) support the development and deployment of advanced fuel manufacturing facilities, in close coordination with activities under specific objective 2(c); (vi) strengthen the Union's position in global fission research through cooperation with allied and like-minded partners through Euratom's bilateral agreements and other relevant frameworks, with a view to consolidate European technological leadership and limit strategic dependencies; (vii) develop and retain a skilled workforce in nuclear fission science and engineering within the Union, in synergy with specific objective 2(d), with particular emphasis on attracting young talent and reversing the loss of expertise that has resulted from decades of underinvestment.

Or. en

Amendment 295

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point i – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Safety of reactor systems and fuel cycles in use in the Community and for reactor types and their fuel cycles which may be used in the future, while ensuring R&I in a resilient nuclear supply chain and security of nuclear supplies, including the development of alternative fuels and spare parts;Safety of reactor systems and fuel cycles in use in the Community and for reactor types and their fuel cycles which may be used in the future, while ensuring R&I in a resilient nuclear supply chain and security of nuclear supplies, including the development of alternative fuels and requisite spare parts in the short, long and medium term, to prevent malfunctions and unscheduled stoppages;

Or. ro

Amendment 296

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point i – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Safety of reactor systems and fuel cycles in use in the Community and for reactor types and their fuel cycles which may be used in the future, while ensuring R&I in a resilient nuclear supply chain and security of nuclear supplies, including the development of alternative fuels and spare parts;Safety of reactor systems and fuel cycles in use in the Community and for reactor types and their fuel cycles which may be used in the future, including small modular reactors (SMRs) and advanced modular reactors (AMRs), while ensuring R&I in a resilient nuclear supply chain and security of nuclear supplies, including the development of alternative fuels and spare parts;

Or. en

Amendment 297

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point i – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Safety of reactor systems and fuel cycles in use in the Community and for reactor types and their fuel cycles which may be used in the future, while ensuring R&I in a resilient nuclear supply chain and security of nuclear supplies, including the development of alternative fuels and spare parts;Safety of reactor systems and fuel cycles in use in the Community and for reactor types and their fuel cycles which may be used in the future, such as advanced closed fuel cycles, while ensuring R&I in a resilient European nuclear supply chain and security of nuclear supplies, including the development of indigenous fuels, alternative fuels and spare parts;

Or. en

Amendment 298

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point iii – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Research and innovation in radiation protection to improve understanding and mitigating the health risks from the ionising radiation, and to enhance emergency preparedness:Research and innovation in radiation protection to improve understanding and mitigating the health risks from the ionising radiation, and to enhance emergency preparedness and timely intervention:

Or. ro

Amendment 299

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point iii – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Research and innovation in radiation protection to improve understanding and mitigating the health risks from the ionising radiation, and to enhance emergency preparedness:Research and innovation in radiation protection to improve understanding and mitigating the health risks from ionising radiation, and to enhance emergency preparedness and response:

Or. en

Amendment 300

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point iii – paragraph 2 – indent 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
- ­ Effects and risks of ionising radiation from industrial, medical or environmental exposure;– Medium- and long-term effects and risks of ionising radiation from industrial, medical or environmental exposure;

Or. ro

Amendment 301

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point iv – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Innovative use of ionising radiation, including in the medical sectorInnovative use of ionising radiation, including in the health sector

Or. en

Amendment 302

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point iv – paragraph 2 – indent 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
- ­ Security of supply and safe use of radionuclides– Security of supply and safe storage and use of radionuclides

Or. ro

Amendment 303

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point v – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Development and use of modelling techniques, including simulation codes, tools and data to validate the safety, security and safeguards of nuclear systems.Development and use of modelling techniques, including simulation codes, tools and data to validate the safety, security and safeguards of nuclear systems, while paying increased attention to the development and use of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence.

Or. ro

Amendment 304

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point vi – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
the drawing up of protocols with well-defined common provisions relating to potential accidents and rapid intervention plans for such situations, establishing regional and cross-border cooperation in the event of emergencies and the responsibilities of the actors involved;

Or. ro

Amendment 305

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Martín Frías, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point vii – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Research for the evaluation, development and deployment of technologies for decommissioning and environmental remediation of nuclear facilities; support for sharing best practices and knowledge and preserving the competences in the field of decommissioning;Research, innovation, demonstration and deployment for the evaluation, development and deployment of technologies for decommissioning, decontamination and environmental remediation of nuclear facilities, including sites affected by incidents or accidents;

Or. en

Amendment 306

Tomas Tobé, Aura Salla, Davor Ivo Stier, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Niels Flemming Hansen, Jan Farský, Eva Maydell, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Raúl de la Hoz Quintano, Jörgen Warborn, François-Xavier Bellamy, Letizia Moratti, Radan Kanev, Susana Solís Pérez, Matej Tonin, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point vii – paragraph 2 – point i (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) Security of nuclear fuel supply
Research and innovation to strengthen the Union’s independence from Russia in nuclear fuel supply, including the qualification and industrial-scale deployment of European fuel solutions aimed at replacing Russian-supplied nuclear fuel and associated technologies; and fostering cooperation between research organisations, industry and nuclear operators to diversify supply chains and reduce strategic dependencies on Russia.

Or. en

Amendment 307

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point vii – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Support for the sharing of best practices and knowledge, the preservation and development of competences in the field of decommissioning, and the use of advanced manufacturing, digitalisation and robotisation technologies to enhance safety, efficiency and performance of operations;

Or. en

Amendment 308

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – subheading 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Specific objective 2(d)Specific objective 2(b)

Or. en

Amendment 309

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point i

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) education, training and mobility, including schemes implemented in synergy with Horizon Europe Framework Programme;(i) education, training and mobility, including schemes implemented in synergy with Horizon Europe Framework Programme. The Programme shall support the strengthening of the European Nuclear Education Network (ENEN) and encourage cross-border training opportunities for nuclear professionals, including through open access schemes to European nuclear research facilities;

Or. en

Amendment 310

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point i

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) education, training and mobility, including schemes implemented in synergy with Horizon Europe Framework Programme;(i) education, training and mobility, including schemes implemented in synergy with the Horizon Europe Framework Programme, to train a highly skilled and adaptable workforce capable of responding to global challenges and the needs of a knowledge-based economy;

Or. ro

Amendment 311

Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Tomáš Kubín, Ondřej Knotek, Auke Zijlstra

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point i

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) education, training and mobility, including schemes implemented in synergy with Horizon Europe Framework Programme;(i) higher and vocational education, training and mobility, including schemes implemented in synergy with Horizon Europe Framework Programme;

Or. en

Amendment 312

Mariateresa Vivaldini, Elena Donazzan, Nicola Procaccini, Alessandro Ciriani, Francesco Torselli, Carlo Ciccioli, Lara Magoni, Pietro Fiocchi

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point i

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) education, training and mobility, including schemes implemented in synergy with Horizon Europe Framework Programme;(i) education, training and mobility, including schemes implemented in synergy with Union programmes;

Or. en

Amendment 313

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – point iv

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(iv) support to Member States in developing their nuclear skills and workforce strategy;(iv) support to Member States in developing their strategy on nuclear skills and a highly-qualified workforce in the nuclear field, able to respond to global challenges;

Or. ro

Amendment 314

Jutta Paulus

Proposal for a regulation

Annex I – subheading 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Specific objective 2(e)Specific objective 2(c)

Or. en