amendment list, 14 April 2026
Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union
Document ITRE-AM-786888 · (COM(2025)0335 – 2025/0335(COD))
Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Full text
Jump to an amendment (315)
- Amendment 2851
- Amendment 2852
- Amendment 2853
- Amendment 2854
- Amendment 2855
- Amendment 2856
- Amendment 2857
- Amendment 2858
- Amendment 2859
- Amendment 2860
- Amendment 2861
- Amendment 2862
- Amendment 2863
- Amendment 2864
- Amendment 2865
- Amendment 2866
- Amendment 2867
- Amendment 2868
- Amendment 2869
- Amendment 2870
- Amendment 2871
- Amendment 2872
- Amendment 2873
- Amendment 2874
- Amendment 2875
- Amendment 2876
- Amendment 2877
- Amendment 2878
- Amendment 2879
- Amendment 2880
- Amendment 2881
- Amendment 2882
- Amendment 2883
- Amendment 2884
- Amendment 2885
- Amendment 2886
- Amendment 2887
- Amendment 2888
- Amendment 2889
- Amendment 2890
- Amendment 2891
- Amendment 2892
- Amendment 2893
- Amendment 2894
- Amendment 2895
- Amendment 2896
- Amendment 2897
- Amendment 2898
- Amendment 2899
- Amendment 2900
- Amendment 2901
- Amendment 2902
- Amendment 2903
- Amendment 2904
- Amendment 2905
- Amendment 2906
- Amendment 2907
- Amendment 2908
- Amendment 2909
- Amendment 2910
- Amendment 2911
- Amendment 2912
- Amendment 2913
- Amendment 2914
- Amendment 2915
- Amendment 2916
- Amendment 2917
- Amendment 2918
- Amendment 2919
- Amendment 2920
- Amendment 2921
- Amendment 2922
- Amendment 2923
- Amendment 2924
- Amendment 2925
- Amendment 2926
- Amendment 2927
- Amendment 2928
- Amendment 2929
- Amendment 2930
- Amendment 2931
- Amendment 2932
- Amendment 2933
- Amendment 2934
- Amendment 2935
- Amendment 2936
- Amendment 2937
- Amendment 2938
- Amendment 2939
- Amendment 2940
- Amendment 2941
- Amendment 2942
- Amendment 2943
- Amendment 2944
- Amendment 2945
- Amendment 2946
- Amendment 2947
- Amendment 2948
- Amendment 2949
- Amendment 2950
- Amendment 2951
- Amendment 2952
- Amendment 2953
- Amendment 2954
- Amendment 2955
- Amendment 2956
- Amendment 2957
- Amendment 2958
- Amendment 2959
- Amendment 2960
- Amendment 2961
- Amendment 2962
- Amendment 2963
- Amendment 2964
- Amendment 2965
- Amendment 2966
- Amendment 2967
- Amendment 2968
- Amendment 2969
- Amendment 2970
- Amendment 2971
- Amendment 2972
- Amendment 2973
- Amendment 2974
- Amendment 2975
- Amendment 2976
- Amendment 2977
- Amendment 2978
- Amendment 2979
- Amendment 2980
- Amendment 2981
- Amendment 2982
- Amendment 2983
- Amendment 2984
- Amendment 2985
- Amendment 2986
- Amendment 2987
- Amendment 2988
- Amendment 2989
- Amendment 2990
- Amendment 2991
- Amendment 2992
- Amendment 2993
- Amendment 2994
- Amendment 2995
- Amendment 2996
- Amendment 2997
- Amendment 2998
- Amendment 2999
- Amendment 3000
- Amendment 3001
- Amendment 3002
- Amendment 3003
- Amendment 3004
- Amendment 3005
- Amendment 3006
- Amendment 3007
- Amendment 3008
- Amendment 3009
- Amendment 3010
- Amendment 3011
- Amendment 3012
- Amendment 3013
- Amendment 3014
- Amendment 3015
- Amendment 3016
- Amendment 3017
- Amendment 3018
- Amendment 3019
- Amendment 3020
- Amendment 3021
- Amendment 3022
- Amendment 3023
- Amendment 3024
- Amendment 3025
- Amendment 3026
- Amendment 3027
- Amendment 3028
- Amendment 3029
- Amendment 3030
- Amendment 3031
- Amendment 3032
- Amendment 3033
- Amendment 3034
- Amendment 3035
- Amendment 3036
- Amendment 3037
- Amendment 3038
- Amendment 3039
- Amendment 3040
- Amendment 3041
- Amendment 3042
- Amendment 3043
- Amendment 3044
- Amendment 3045
- Amendment 3046
- Amendment 3047
- Amendment 3048
- Amendment 3049
- Amendment 3050
- Amendment 3051
- Amendment 3052
- Amendment 3053
- Amendment 3054
- Amendment 3055
- Amendment 3056
- Amendment 3057
- Amendment 3058
- Amendment 3059
- Amendment 3060
- Amendment 3061
- Amendment 3062
- Amendment 3063
- Amendment 3064
- Amendment 3065
- Amendment 3066
- Amendment 3067
- Amendment 3068
- Amendment 3069
- Amendment 3070
- Amendment 3071
- Amendment 3072
- Amendment 3073
- Amendment 3074
- Amendment 3075
- Amendment 3076
- Amendment 3077
- Amendment 3078
- Amendment 3079
- Amendment 3080
- Amendment 3081
- Amendment 3082
- Amendment 3083
- Amendment 3084
- Amendment 3085
- Amendment 3086
- Amendment 3087
- Amendment 3088
- Amendment 3089
- Amendment 3090
- Amendment 3091
- Amendment 3092
- Amendment 3093
- Amendment 3094
- Amendment 3095
- Amendment 3096
- Amendment 3097
- Amendment 3098
- Amendment 3099
- Amendment 3100
- Amendment 3101
- Amendment 3102
- Amendment 3103
- Amendment 3104
- Amendment 3105
- Amendment 3106
- Amendment 3107
- Amendment 3108
- Amendment 3109
- Amendment 3110
- Amendment 3111
- Amendment 3112
- Amendment 3113
- Amendment 3114
- Amendment 3115
- Amendment 3116
- Amendment 3117
- Amendment 3118
- Amendment 3119
- Amendment 3120
- Amendment 3121
- Amendment 3122
- Amendment 3123
- Amendment 3124
- Amendment 3125
- Amendment 3126
- Amendment 3127
- Amendment 3128
- Amendment 3129
- Amendment 3130
- Amendment 3131
- Amendment 3132
- Amendment 3133
- Amendment 3134
- Amendment 3135
- Amendment 3136
- Amendment 3137
- Amendment 3138
- Amendment 3139
- Amendment 3140
- Amendment 3141
- Amendment 3142
- Amendment 3143
- Amendment 3144
- Amendment 3145
- Amendment 3146
- Amendment 3147
- Amendment 3148
- Amendment 3149
- Amendment 3150
- Amendment 3151
- Amendment 3152
- Amendment 3153
- Amendment 3154
- Amendment 3155
- Amendment 3156
- Amendment 3157
- Amendment 3158
- Amendment 3159
- Amendment 3160
- Amendment 3161
- Amendment 3162
- Amendment 3163
- Amendment 3164
- Amendment 3165
Text 2,074 paragraphs
Amendment 2851
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) loss of control of assets with propulsion; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 2852
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) loss of control of assets with capacity to emit interferences susceptible to adversely impact the security of other space operations. | deleted |
Or. fr
Read the rest (2,062 paragraphs)
Amendment 2853
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Competent authorities shall submit to the Agency the list of entities applying a simplified risk management. | 2. Competent authorities shall submit to the Agency the list of entities applying an assisted risk management. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2854
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Agency shall report to the Commission annually on the application of the simplified risk management across the Union. The Agency may submit recommendations to facilitate supervisory convergence across the internal market. | The Agency shall report to the Commission annually on the application of the assisted risk management across the Union. The Agency may submit recommendations to facilitate supervisory convergence across the internal market. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2855
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 80 | deleted |
| Identification and management of information and assets of space infrastructure | |
| 1. Union space operators shall establish, maintain and update comprehensive policies for the categorization and management of information and assets of space infrastructure. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall identify and document assets in accordance with point 2, of Annex VII, considering the risk assessments referred to in Article 78(2), and proportionately with the need to monitor and detect incidents referred to in Article 83. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall categorise information according to information security needs, based on, at least: | |
| (a) the need to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity and availability of information; | |
| (b) the level of criticality required by the security level of the respective space mission. | |
| 4. | |
| For the purposes of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall set up and maintain inventories. | |
| The inventories referred to in first subparagraph shall be drawn-up by individual space mission, indicating the origin and the current physical location of assets, including the identification of a cloud-based service, when relevant. Inventories shall be up to date. |
Or. en
Amendment 2856
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 80 | deleted |
| Identification and management of information and assets of space infrastructure | |
| 1. Union space operators shall establish, maintain and update comprehensive policies for the categorization and management of information and assets of space infrastructure. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall identify and document assets in accordance with point 2, of Annex VII, considering the risk assessments referred to in Article 78(2), and proportionately with the need to monitor and detect incidents referred to in Article 83. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall categorise information according to information security needs, based on, at least: | |
| (a) the need to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity and availability of information; | |
| (b) the level of criticality required by the security level of the respective space mission. | |
| 4. | |
| For the purposes of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall set up and maintain inventories. | |
| The inventories referred to in first subparagraph shall be drawn-up by individual space mission, indicating the origin and the current physical location of assets, including the identification of a cloud-based service, when relevant. Inventories shall be up to date. |
Or. en
Amendment 2857
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 80 | deleted |
| Identification and management of information and assets of space infrastructure | |
| 1. Union space operators shall establish, maintain and update comprehensive policies for the categorization and management of information and assets of space infrastructure. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall identify and document assets in accordance with point 2, of Annex VII, considering the risk assessments referred to in Article 78(2), and proportionately with the need to monitor and detect incidents referred to in Article 83. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall categorise information according to information security needs, based on, at least: | |
| (a) the need to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity and availability of information; | |
| (b) the level of criticality required by the security level of the respective space mission. | |
| 4. | |
| For the purposes of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall set up and maintain inventories. | |
| The inventories referred to in first subparagraph shall be drawn-up by individual space mission, indicating the origin and the current physical location of assets, including the identification of a cloud-based service, when relevant. Inventories shall be up to date. |
Or. en
Amendment 2858
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators shall establish, maintain and update comprehensive policies for the categorization and management of information and assets of space infrastructure. | 1. Space operators active in the Union shall establish, maintain and update comprehensive policies for the categorization and management of information and assets of space infrastructure. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2859
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators shall identify and document assets in accordance with point 2, of Annex VII, considering the risk assessments referred to in Article 78(2), and proportionately with the need to monitor and detect incidents referred to in Article 83. | 2. Space operators active in the Union shall identify and document assets in accordance with point 2, of Annex VII, considering the risk assessments referred to in Article 78(2), and proportionately with the need to monitor and detect incidents referred to in Article 83. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2860
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 3 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the need to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity and availability of information; | (a) the need to ensure the confidentiality, manner of access, security, integrity, authenticity and availability of information; |
Or. ro
Justification
The information contained in documents necessary for space activities must be held in a well-protected database in accordance with the relevant provisions.
Amendment 2861
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| For the purposes of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall set up and maintain inventories. | For the purposes of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, space operators active in the Union shall set up and maintain inventories. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2862
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The inventories referred to in first subparagraph shall be drawn-up by individual space mission, indicating the origin and the current physical location of assets, including the identification of a cloud-based service, when relevant. Inventories shall be up to date. | The inventories referred to in first subparagraph shall be drawn-up by individual space mission, indicating the origin and the current physical location of assets, including the identification of a cloud-based service, when relevant. Inventories shall be up to date and, subject to any specific information security requirements, shall be made available to the public. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2863
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 81 | deleted |
| Management and control of access rights | |
| 1. Union space operators shall implement the management and control of access rights through identity and access management protocols. | |
| 2. The protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall set-out the conditions and procedures for the logical and physical access rights to systems and assets, including for remote access. | |
| 3. The identity and access management protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall: | |
| (a) be capable of safeguarding accesses to the ground segment and to the centres for the control of the space segment; | |
| (b) allow restriction of physical and logical access to all critical assets, critical information, critical functions, critical operations and, as appropriate, critical equipment or information identified in accordance with Article 80(2); | |
| (c) be tailored to standard operations and to emergency situations, to enable effective and timely emergency responses upon the activation of the response and recovery plans referred to in Article 87. | |
| 4. | |
| When setting-out the conditions and procedures referred to in paragraph 2, Union space operators shall cover the issuance, the continuous management (including change, upgrade or downgrade), the revocation, termination, verification and the audit of logical and physical access rights for all authorised devices, processes, and users. | |
| Those conditions and procedures shall be based on the principles of ‘need to know’ and ‘the least privilege’ (limitation to what is required for ensuring a legitimate and approved use or activity). | |
| 5. The identity and access rights referred to in paragraph 2 shall be revoked automatically when the authorizations of staff or devices expire or are no longer needed. | |
| 6. The identity and access management protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure adequate protection of information and assets identified in accordance with Article 80(2) from risks, including from damage, misuse or unauthorised access or usage. |
Or. en
Amendment 2864
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 81 | deleted |
| Management and control of access rights | |
| 1. Union space operators shall implement the management and control of access rights through identity and access management protocols. | |
| 2. The protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall set-out the conditions and procedures for the logical and physical access rights to systems and assets, including for remote access. | |
| 3. The identity and access management protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall: | |
| (a) be capable of safeguarding accesses to the ground segment and to the centres for the control of the space segment; | |
| (b) allow restriction of physical and logical access to all critical assets, critical information, critical functions, critical operations and, as appropriate, critical equipment or information identified in accordance with Article 80(2); | |
| (c) be tailored to standard operations and to emergency situations, to enable effective and timely emergency responses upon the activation of the response and recovery plans referred to in Article 87. | |
| 4. | |
| When setting-out the conditions and procedures referred to in paragraph 2, Union space operators shall cover the issuance, the continuous management (including change, upgrade or downgrade), the revocation, termination, verification and the audit of logical and physical access rights for all authorised devices, processes, and users. | |
| Those conditions and procedures shall be based on the principles of ‘need to know’ and ‘the least privilege’ (limitation to what is required for ensuring a legitimate and approved use or activity). | |
| 5. The identity and access rights referred to in paragraph 2 shall be revoked automatically when the authorizations of staff or devices expire or are no longer needed. | |
| 6. The identity and access management protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure adequate protection of information and assets identified in accordance with Article 80(2) from risks, including from damage, misuse or unauthorised access or usage. |
Or. en
Amendment 2865
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 81 | deleted |
| Management and control of access rights | |
| 1. Union space operators shall implement the management and control of access rights through identity and access management protocols. | |
| 2. The protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall set-out the conditions and procedures for the logical and physical access rights to systems and assets, including for remote access. | |
| 3. The identity and access management protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall: | |
| (a) be capable of safeguarding accesses to the ground segment and to the centres for the control of the space segment; | |
| (b) allow restriction of physical and logical access to all critical assets, critical information, critical functions, critical operations and, as appropriate, critical equipment or information identified in accordance with Article 80(2); | |
| (c) be tailored to standard operations and to emergency situations, to enable effective and timely emergency responses upon the activation of the response and recovery plans referred to in Article 87. | |
| 4. | |
| When setting-out the conditions and procedures referred to in paragraph 2, Union space operators shall cover the issuance, the continuous management (including change, upgrade or downgrade), the revocation, termination, verification and the audit of logical and physical access rights for all authorised devices, processes, and users. | |
| Those conditions and procedures shall be based on the principles of ‘need to know’ and ‘the least privilege’ (limitation to what is required for ensuring a legitimate and approved use or activity). | |
| 5. The identity and access rights referred to in paragraph 2 shall be revoked automatically when the authorizations of staff or devices expire or are no longer needed. | |
| 6. The identity and access management protocols referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure adequate protection of information and assets identified in accordance with Article 80(2) from risks, including from damage, misuse or unauthorised access or usage. |
Or. en
Amendment 2866
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators shall implement the management and control of access rights through identity and access management protocols. | 1. Space operators active in the Union shall implement the management and control of access rights through identity and access management protocols. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2867
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 82 | deleted |
| Physical resilience | |
| 1. Union space operators shall take the measures laid down in point 3, of Annex VII, and any other measures that are necessary and adequate to ensure the resilience of the physical assets and which are at least equivalent to the technical, security and organisational measures referred to in Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 to ensure the resilience of the ground segments. | |
| 2. Where Union space operators have been identified as critical entities in accordance with Directive (EU) 2022/2557, this Regulation shall apply without prejudice to, and in complementarity with, that Directive. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall define, protect and segregate areas that contain assets and information which are deemed sensitive or identified as critical, based on the identification carried out pursuant to Article 80(2). | |
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to amend the requirements laid down in point 3, of Annex VII, to adapt them to the scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2868
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 82 | deleted |
| Physical resilience | |
| 1. Union space operators shall take the measures laid down in point 3, of Annex VII, and any other measures that are necessary and adequate to ensure the resilience of the physical assets and which are at least equivalent to the technical, security and organisational measures referred to in Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 to ensure the resilience of the ground segments. | |
| 2. Where Union space operators have been identified as critical entities in accordance with Directive (EU) 2022/2557, this Regulation shall apply without prejudice to, and in complementarity with, that Directive. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall define, protect and segregate areas that contain assets and information which are deemed sensitive or identified as critical, based on the identification carried out pursuant to Article 80(2). | |
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to amend the requirements laid down in point 3, of Annex VII, to adapt them to the scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2869
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 82 | deleted |
| Physical resilience | |
| 1. Union space operators shall take the measures laid down in point 3, of Annex VII, and any other measures that are necessary and adequate to ensure the resilience of the physical assets and which are at least equivalent to the technical, security and organisational measures referred to in Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 to ensure the resilience of the ground segments. | |
| 2. Where Union space operators have been identified as critical entities in accordance with Directive (EU) 2022/2557, this Regulation shall apply without prejudice to, and in complementarity with, that Directive. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall define, protect and segregate areas that contain assets and information which are deemed sensitive or identified as critical, based on the identification carried out pursuant to Article 80(2). | |
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to amend the requirements laid down in point 3, of Annex VII, to adapt them to the scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2870
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 83 | deleted |
| Detection and monitoring of incidents | |
| 1. Union space operators shall monitor on a continuous basis the occurrence of anomalies and incidents by using appropriate detection systems and mechanisms. | |
| 2. Union space operators, and respectively entities applying the simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure that the ground stations have access to detection systems and mechanisms that comply with at least the requirements laid down in point 4, of Annex VII. | |
| 3. The spacecraft and the ground segment shall be configured to generate and respectively receive, upon detection of an incident, a security event which shall be sent to a security monitoring subsystem. The security monitoring subsystem of the ground segment shall be, in terms of information technology, segregated from the rest of the infrastructure (logical segregation). | |
| 4. Union space operators shall ensure that the detection systems and mechanisms are regularly tested in accordance with Articles 88 and 89. | |
| 5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to amend the list of requirements laid down in point 4, of Annex VII, to adapt them to the scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2871
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 83 | deleted |
| Detection and monitoring of incidents | |
| 1. Union space operators shall monitor on a continuous basis the occurrence of anomalies and incidents by using appropriate detection systems and mechanisms. | |
| 2. Union space operators, and respectively entities applying the simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure that the ground stations have access to detection systems and mechanisms that comply with at least the requirements laid down in point 4, of Annex VII. | |
| 3. The spacecraft and the ground segment shall be configured to generate and respectively receive, upon detection of an incident, a security event which shall be sent to a security monitoring subsystem. The security monitoring subsystem of the ground segment shall be, in terms of information technology, segregated from the rest of the infrastructure (logical segregation). | |
| 4. Union space operators shall ensure that the detection systems and mechanisms are regularly tested in accordance with Articles 88 and 89. | |
| 5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to amend the list of requirements laid down in point 4, of Annex VII, to adapt them to the scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2872
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 83 | deleted |
| Detection and monitoring of incidents | |
| 1. Union space operators shall monitor on a continuous basis the occurrence of anomalies and incidents by using appropriate detection systems and mechanisms. | |
| 2. Union space operators, and respectively entities applying the simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure that the ground stations have access to detection systems and mechanisms that comply with at least the requirements laid down in point 4, of Annex VII. | |
| 3. The spacecraft and the ground segment shall be configured to generate and respectively receive, upon detection of an incident, a security event which shall be sent to a security monitoring subsystem. The security monitoring subsystem of the ground segment shall be, in terms of information technology, segregated from the rest of the infrastructure (logical segregation). | |
| 4. Union space operators shall ensure that the detection systems and mechanisms are regularly tested in accordance with Articles 88 and 89. | |
| 5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to amend the list of requirements laid down in point 4, of Annex VII, to adapt them to the scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2873
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 84 | deleted |
| Prevention and protection | |
| 1. Union space operators shall tailor the measures concerning the cybersecurity of the spacecraft and the ground segment adopted in accordance with this Chapter to the specific needs of the space mission and shall adequately cover the risks identified in the security risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2). | |
| 2. Union space operators shall ensure that the network and information systems fulfil the following conditions: | |
| (a) they comply with the requirements laid down in point 5.1, of Annex VII; | |
| (b) they are configured to allow the ground segment to supervise the telemetry/telecommand on ground and to supervise the state of the spacecraft; | |
| (c) they enable Union space operators to maintain effective technical control of the space segment. | |
| 3. | |
| Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure that only authorised devices communicate with the systems in charge of the control, command of a satellite, and configuration of the space mission. | |
| They shall comply to that effect with at least the requirements laid down in point 5.2, of Annex VII and point 5.3, of Annex VII. | |
| 4. Union space operators shall implement preventive and protective measures that are necessary and adequate to ensure the resilience of space activities, by taking at least the measures regarding the ground segment which are laid down in point 5.4, of Annex VII. | |
| 5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113 to amend the requirements laid down in point 5, of Annex VII, to adapt them to the scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2874
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 84 | deleted |
| Prevention and protection | |
| 1. Union space operators shall tailor the measures concerning the cybersecurity of the spacecraft and the ground segment adopted in accordance with this Chapter to the specific needs of the space mission and shall adequately cover the risks identified in the security risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2). | |
| 2. Union space operators shall ensure that the network and information systems fulfil the following conditions: | |
| (a) they comply with the requirements laid down in point 5.1, of Annex VII; | |
| (b) they are configured to allow the ground segment to supervise the telemetry/telecommand on ground and to supervise the state of the spacecraft; | |
| (c) they enable Union space operators to maintain effective technical control of the space segment. | |
| 3. | |
| Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure that only authorised devices communicate with the systems in charge of the control, command of a satellite, and configuration of the space mission. | |
| They shall comply to that effect with at least the requirements laid down in point 5.2, of Annex VII and point 5.3, of Annex VII. | |
| 4. Union space operators shall implement preventive and protective measures that are necessary and adequate to ensure the resilience of space activities, by taking at least the measures regarding the ground segment which are laid down in point 5.4, of Annex VII. | |
| 5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113 to amend the requirements laid down in point 5, of Annex VII, to adapt them to the scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2875
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 84 | deleted |
| Prevention and protection | |
| 1. Union space operators shall tailor the measures concerning the cybersecurity of the spacecraft and the ground segment adopted in accordance with this Chapter to the specific needs of the space mission and shall adequately cover the risks identified in the security risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2). | |
| 2. Union space operators shall ensure that the network and information systems fulfil the following conditions: | |
| (a) they comply with the requirements laid down in point 5.1, of Annex VII; | |
| (b) they are configured to allow the ground segment to supervise the telemetry/telecommand on ground and to supervise the state of the spacecraft; | |
| (c) they enable Union space operators to maintain effective technical control of the space segment. | |
| 3. | |
| Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure that only authorised devices communicate with the systems in charge of the control, command of a satellite, and configuration of the space mission. | |
| They shall comply to that effect with at least the requirements laid down in point 5.2, of Annex VII and point 5.3, of Annex VII. | |
| 4. Union space operators shall implement preventive and protective measures that are necessary and adequate to ensure the resilience of space activities, by taking at least the measures regarding the ground segment which are laid down in point 5.4, of Annex VII. | |
| 5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113 to amend the requirements laid down in point 5, of Annex VII, to adapt them to the scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2876
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 85 | deleted |
| Cryptography and encryption | |
| 1. Based on the risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2), Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall comply with the following: | |
| (a) they shall define a cryptographic concept to ensure the cybersecurity of the space missions, by duly considering all the relevant criteria, such as the objective of the space mission, the features of the payload, any functional requirement and any relevant threat scenarios; | |
| (b) they shall select cryptographic mechanisms in accordance with the relevant standards and recommendations of competent authorities; | |
| (c) they shall implement policies and procedures for the use of cryptography and encryption for their space missions. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall establish a lifecycle management policy for the cryptographic keys which shall set out rules for the protection and management of cryptographic key to ensure the secure generation, use, storage, distribution, and disposal thereof. | |
| 3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, first subparagraph, Union space operators shall implement at least the following requirements: | |
| (a) end-to-end authentication of the links between the satellite control centres and the space segment, by using cryptographic mechanisms between the ground segment and the satellite; | |
| (b) ensure the encryption of telecommands considering the risk assessments referred to in Article 78(2), and following recommendations from supervisory reviews; | |
| (c) ensuring the availability of cryptographic keys and parameters that are necessary to ensure the implementation of the response and recovery plans referred to in Article 87, through redundant cryptographic equipment, or by implementing key escrowing. | |
| 4. The Commission is empowered, in accordance with Article 113, to adopt delegated acts to further supplement the use by Union space operators of cryptographic products and related key management products or services certified under the European cybersecurity certification schemes adopted pursuant to Article 49 of Regulation (EU) 2019/881, to ensure the protection of the telemetry and telecommands. |
Or. en
Amendment 2877
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 85 | deleted |
| Cryptography and encryption | |
| 1. Based on the risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2), Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall comply with the following: | |
| (a) they shall define a cryptographic concept to ensure the cybersecurity of the space missions, by duly considering all the relevant criteria, such as the objective of the space mission, the features of the payload, any functional requirement and any relevant threat scenarios; | |
| (b) they shall select cryptographic mechanisms in accordance with the relevant standards and recommendations of competent authorities; | |
| (c) they shall implement policies and procedures for the use of cryptography and encryption for their space missions. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall establish a lifecycle management policy for the cryptographic keys which shall set out rules for the protection and management of cryptographic key to ensure the secure generation, use, storage, distribution, and disposal thereof. | |
| 3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, first subparagraph, Union space operators shall implement at least the following requirements: | |
| (a) end-to-end authentication of the links between the satellite control centres and the space segment, by using cryptographic mechanisms between the ground segment and the satellite; | |
| (b) ensure the encryption of telecommands considering the risk assessments referred to in Article 78(2), and following recommendations from supervisory reviews; | |
| (c) ensuring the availability of cryptographic keys and parameters that are necessary to ensure the implementation of the response and recovery plans referred to in Article 87, through redundant cryptographic equipment, or by implementing key escrowing. | |
| 4. The Commission is empowered, in accordance with Article 113, to adopt delegated acts to further supplement the use by Union space operators of cryptographic products and related key management products or services certified under the European cybersecurity certification schemes adopted pursuant to Article 49 of Regulation (EU) 2019/881, to ensure the protection of the telemetry and telecommands. |
Or. en
Amendment 2878
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 85 | deleted |
| Cryptography and encryption | |
| 1. Based on the risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2), Union space operators, and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall comply with the following: | |
| (a) they shall define a cryptographic concept to ensure the cybersecurity of the space missions, by duly considering all the relevant criteria, such as the objective of the space mission, the features of the payload, any functional requirement and any relevant threat scenarios; | |
| (b) they shall select cryptographic mechanisms in accordance with the relevant standards and recommendations of competent authorities; | |
| (c) they shall implement policies and procedures for the use of cryptography and encryption for their space missions. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall establish a lifecycle management policy for the cryptographic keys which shall set out rules for the protection and management of cryptographic key to ensure the secure generation, use, storage, distribution, and disposal thereof. | |
| 3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, first subparagraph, Union space operators shall implement at least the following requirements: | |
| (a) end-to-end authentication of the links between the satellite control centres and the space segment, by using cryptographic mechanisms between the ground segment and the satellite; | |
| (b) ensure the encryption of telecommands considering the risk assessments referred to in Article 78(2), and following recommendations from supervisory reviews; | |
| (c) ensuring the availability of cryptographic keys and parameters that are necessary to ensure the implementation of the response and recovery plans referred to in Article 87, through redundant cryptographic equipment, or by implementing key escrowing. | |
| 4. The Commission is empowered, in accordance with Article 113, to adopt delegated acts to further supplement the use by Union space operators of cryptographic products and related key management products or services certified under the European cybersecurity certification schemes adopted pursuant to Article 49 of Regulation (EU) 2019/881, to ensure the protection of the telemetry and telecommands. |
Or. en
Amendment 2879
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) they shall define a cryptographic concept to ensure the cybersecurity of the space missions, by duly considering all the relevant criteria, such as the objective of the space mission, the features of the payload, any functional requirement and any relevant threat scenarios; | (a) they shall define a cryptographic concept to ensure the cybersecurity of the space missions, by duly considering all the relevant criteria, such as the objective and duration of the space mission, the features of the payload, any functional requirement and any relevant threat scenarios; |
Or. ro
Amendment 2880
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) they shall implement policies and procedures for the use of cryptography and encryption for their space missions. | (c) they shall implement policies and procedures for the use of cryptography and encryption for their space missions and make provision for their periodic updating in order to prevent unauthorised database access. |
Or. ro
Justification
The information contained in documents necessary for space activities must be updated periodically, while ensuring the security of all data in accordance with the relevant provisions.
Amendment 2881
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 86 | deleted |
| Backup management and redundancies | |
| 1. | |
| Union space operators and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure a sound and comprehensive backup management policy to enable the restoration of the network and information systems, and to facilitate, with minimum downtime and limited disruption or loss recovery, the recovery processes and the retrieval of data, upon the activation of the response and disaster recovery measures. | |
| That policy shall specify the data subject to the backup management, the frequency of backups, and the restoration and recovery procedures and methods used. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall ensure that the backup systems do not jeopardise the security of the network and information systems, or the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, and availability of data. | |
| 3. | |
| Union space operators and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure sufficient redundancies of relevant components of the network and information systems in the ground segment. | |
| They shall in particular: | |
| (a) ensure redundancies of elements, other than the components of the network and information systems, as necessary to safeguard the continuity of operations, for instance redundancies of power supply in the form of generators for secondary processing sites; | |
| (b) ensure geographical splitting into distinct locations, as deemed appropriate, of redundant elements and of back-up; | |
| (c) ensure an adequate survivability of the space segment, without intervention, to facilitate quick recovery from incidents, such as notably from cyber-attacks, disasters, failures, as well as from an accidental interruption of services. | |
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to specify further the requirements on backup needed to ensure adequate survivability of the space segment and to facilitate quick recovery from incidents in order to allow the provisions of this Regulation to be adapted to scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2882
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 86 | deleted |
| Backup management and redundancies | |
| 1. | |
| Union space operators and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure a sound and comprehensive backup management policy to enable the restoration of the network and information systems, and to facilitate, with minimum downtime and limited disruption or loss recovery, the recovery processes and the retrieval of data, upon the activation of the response and disaster recovery measures. | |
| That policy shall specify the data subject to the backup management, the frequency of backups, and the restoration and recovery procedures and methods used. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall ensure that the backup systems do not jeopardise the security of the network and information systems, or the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, and availability of data. | |
| 3. | |
| Union space operators and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure sufficient redundancies of relevant components of the network and information systems in the ground segment. | |
| They shall in particular: | |
| (a) ensure redundancies of elements, other than the components of the network and information systems, as necessary to safeguard the continuity of operations, for instance redundancies of power supply in the form of generators for secondary processing sites; | |
| (b) ensure geographical splitting into distinct locations, as deemed appropriate, of redundant elements and of back-up; | |
| (c) ensure an adequate survivability of the space segment, without intervention, to facilitate quick recovery from incidents, such as notably from cyber-attacks, disasters, failures, as well as from an accidental interruption of services. | |
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to specify further the requirements on backup needed to ensure adequate survivability of the space segment and to facilitate quick recovery from incidents in order to allow the provisions of this Regulation to be adapted to scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2883
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 86 | deleted |
| Backup management and redundancies | |
| 1. | |
| Union space operators and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure a sound and comprehensive backup management policy to enable the restoration of the network and information systems, and to facilitate, with minimum downtime and limited disruption or loss recovery, the recovery processes and the retrieval of data, upon the activation of the response and disaster recovery measures. | |
| That policy shall specify the data subject to the backup management, the frequency of backups, and the restoration and recovery procedures and methods used. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall ensure that the backup systems do not jeopardise the security of the network and information systems, or the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, and availability of data. | |
| 3. | |
| Union space operators and respectively entities applying a simplified risk management, as regards the critical assets and critical functions referred to in Article 79(1), first subparagraph, shall ensure sufficient redundancies of relevant components of the network and information systems in the ground segment. | |
| They shall in particular: | |
| (a) ensure redundancies of elements, other than the components of the network and information systems, as necessary to safeguard the continuity of operations, for instance redundancies of power supply in the form of generators for secondary processing sites; | |
| (b) ensure geographical splitting into distinct locations, as deemed appropriate, of redundant elements and of back-up; | |
| (c) ensure an adequate survivability of the space segment, without intervention, to facilitate quick recovery from incidents, such as notably from cyber-attacks, disasters, failures, as well as from an accidental interruption of services. | |
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to specify further the requirements on backup needed to ensure adequate survivability of the space segment and to facilitate quick recovery from incidents in order to allow the provisions of this Regulation to be adapted to scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques. |
Or. en
Amendment 2884
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| That policy shall specify the data subject to the backup management, the frequency of backups, and the restoration and recovery procedures and methods used. | That policy shall specify the data subject to the backup management, the frequency of backups, and the access procedures and the restoration and recovery methods used. |
Or. ro
Justification
The information contained in documents necessary for space activities is quite sensitive and the security of all data must be ensured in accordance with the relevant provisions.
Amendment 2885
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 87
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 87 | deleted |
| Business continuity policy and response and recovery plans | |
| 1. As part of their risk management, Union space operators shall put in place and shall document incident and crisis management measures. The measures shall be structured into a business continuity policy which shall be implemented through tailored response and recovery plans. | |
| 2. The response and recovery plans referred to in paragraph 1 shall allow Union space operators to quickly and effectively respond to incidents and contain the adverse effects thereof. | |
| 3. | |
| The crisis management measures taken by Union space operators shall build on the measures established, within the space segment and the ground segment, including redundancies and backups, to mitigate in particular the following: | |
| (a) natural disasters; | |
| (b) operation accidents; | |
| (c) disruptions in the supply of utilities, notably during the operation phases; | |
| (d) loss of power generation, power failures and disturbances and changes of conditioning of the relevant equipment; | |
| (e) loss of physical assets at the ground segment, including, for instance, loss of mission control centres, loss of satellite control centres, and loss of terrestrial interconnection between them; | |
| (f) interferences on the ground-to-space, space-to-ground and the space-to-space radio frequency links; | |
| (g) altered or compromised parts of the ground segment, including as regards the cryptographic keys. | |
| When implementing the requirements set out in the first subparagraph, Union space operators shall take into consideration the need to maintain effective technical control of the space segment, and ensuring the continuity of services and minimising the areas of the unavailability of services. | |
| 4. Union space operators shall ensure that staff involved in carrying out business continuity measures and implementing response and recovery plans have acquired full and adequate trainings needed to fulfil their roles. |
Or. en
Amendment 2886
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 87
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 87 | deleted |
| Business continuity policy and response and recovery plans | |
| 1. As part of their risk management, Union space operators shall put in place and shall document incident and crisis management measures. The measures shall be structured into a business continuity policy which shall be implemented through tailored response and recovery plans. | |
| 2. The response and recovery plans referred to in paragraph 1 shall allow Union space operators to quickly and effectively respond to incidents and contain the adverse effects thereof. | |
| 3. | |
| The crisis management measures taken by Union space operators shall build on the measures established, within the space segment and the ground segment, including redundancies and backups, to mitigate in particular the following: | |
| (a) natural disasters; | |
| (b) operation accidents; | |
| (c) disruptions in the supply of utilities, notably during the operation phases; | |
| (d) loss of power generation, power failures and disturbances and changes of conditioning of the relevant equipment; | |
| (e) loss of physical assets at the ground segment, including, for instance, loss of mission control centres, loss of satellite control centres, and loss of terrestrial interconnection between them; | |
| (f) interferences on the ground-to-space, space-to-ground and the space-to-space radio frequency links; | |
| (g) altered or compromised parts of the ground segment, including as regards the cryptographic keys. | |
| When implementing the requirements set out in the first subparagraph, Union space operators shall take into consideration the need to maintain effective technical control of the space segment, and ensuring the continuity of services and minimising the areas of the unavailability of services. | |
| 4. Union space operators shall ensure that staff involved in carrying out business continuity measures and implementing response and recovery plans have acquired full and adequate trainings needed to fulfil their roles. |
Or. en
Amendment 2887
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 87
Proposal for a regulation
Article 87
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 87 | deleted |
| Business continuity policy and response and recovery plans | |
| 1. As part of their risk management, Union space operators shall put in place and shall document incident and crisis management measures. The measures shall be structured into a business continuity policy which shall be implemented through tailored response and recovery plans. | |
| 2. The response and recovery plans referred to in paragraph 1 shall allow Union space operators to quickly and effectively respond to incidents and contain the adverse effects thereof. | |
| 3. | |
| The crisis management measures taken by Union space operators shall build on the measures established, within the space segment and the ground segment, including redundancies and backups, to mitigate in particular the following: | |
| (a) natural disasters; | |
| (b) operation accidents; | |
| (c) disruptions in the supply of utilities, notably during the operation phases; | |
| (d) loss of power generation, power failures and disturbances and changes of conditioning of the relevant equipment; | |
| (e) loss of physical assets at the ground segment, including, for instance, loss of mission control centres, loss of satellite control centres, and loss of terrestrial interconnection between them; | |
| (f) interferences on the ground-to-space, space-to-ground and the space-to-space radio frequency links; | |
| (g) altered or compromised parts of the ground segment, including as regards the cryptographic keys. | |
| When implementing the requirements set out in the first subparagraph, Union space operators shall take into consideration the need to maintain effective technical control of the space segment, and ensuring the continuity of services and minimising the areas of the unavailability of services. | |
| 4. Union space operators shall ensure that staff involved in carrying out business continuity measures and implementing response and recovery plans have acquired full and adequate trainings needed to fulfil their roles. |
Or. en
Amendment 2888
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 87 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. As part of their risk management, Union space operators shall put in place and shall document incident and crisis management measures. The measures shall be structured into a business continuity policy which shall be implemented through tailored response and recovery plans. | 1. As part of their risk management, Union space operators shall put in place and shall document incident and crisis management measures. The measures shall be structured into a business continuity policy which shall be implemented through tailored response and recovery plans. |
| The business continuity policy shall above all prioritise the security of personnel on board spacecraft, where applicable, and on the ground, followed by: the continuity of collision avoidance services, the exchange of information between the operator, Agency and competent authority, and all remaining activities. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2889
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 88 | deleted |
| Testing | |
| 1. Union space operators shall establish, maintain and review a testing programme for the network and information systems, as an integral part of their risk-management. | |
| 2. The testing programme referred to in paragraph 1 shall include testing campaigns comprising all necessary tests, notably considering the risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2). | |
| 3. | |
| Union space operators shall ensure that, prior to launch, or in the case of satellites part of a constellation, prior to the launch of the first batch of satellites, and at least every 3 years afterwards, they carry out Threat Led Penetration Testing (TLPT). | |
| The plan for testers carrying out a TLPT shall outline the scope and the methodology of the TLPT, the entity in charge of carrying out such test, the mitigation strategy for any risks which carrying out of a TLPT may entail. | |
| Testers carrying out TLPT shall comply with the following requirements: | |
| (a) they shall be of the highest suitability and reputability; | |
| (b) they shall possess all technical and organisational capabilities and shall demonstrate specific expertise in penetration testing; | |
| (c) they shall provide an independent assurance or an audit report; | |
| (d) they shall present a redress plan to address the identified risks. | |
| Testers that are external to the corporate structure of the Union space operators shall be certified by an accreditation body of a Member State or shall adhere to formal codes of conduct or ethical frameworks. They shall be fully covered by a relevant professional indemnity insurance against risks of misconduct and negligence. | |
| Union space operators shall monitor system failures and anomalies observed during the testing processes and evaluate their criticality. |
Or. en
Amendment 2890
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 88 | deleted |
| Testing | |
| 1. Union space operators shall establish, maintain and review a testing programme for the network and information systems, as an integral part of their risk-management. | |
| 2. The testing programme referred to in paragraph 1 shall include testing campaigns comprising all necessary tests, notably considering the risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2). | |
| 3. | |
| Union space operators shall ensure that, prior to launch, or in the case of satellites part of a constellation, prior to the launch of the first batch of satellites, and at least every 3 years afterwards, they carry out Threat Led Penetration Testing (TLPT). | |
| The plan for testers carrying out a TLPT shall outline the scope and the methodology of the TLPT, the entity in charge of carrying out such test, the mitigation strategy for any risks which carrying out of a TLPT may entail. | |
| Testers carrying out TLPT shall comply with the following requirements: | |
| (a) they shall be of the highest suitability and reputability; | |
| (b) they shall possess all technical and organisational capabilities and shall demonstrate specific expertise in penetration testing; | |
| (c) they shall provide an independent assurance or an audit report; | |
| (d) they shall present a redress plan to address the identified risks. | |
| Testers that are external to the corporate structure of the Union space operators shall be certified by an accreditation body of a Member State or shall adhere to formal codes of conduct or ethical frameworks. They shall be fully covered by a relevant professional indemnity insurance against risks of misconduct and negligence. | |
| Union space operators shall monitor system failures and anomalies observed during the testing processes and evaluate their criticality. |
Or. en
Amendment 2891
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 88 | deleted |
| Testing | |
| 1. Union space operators shall establish, maintain and review a testing programme for the network and information systems, as an integral part of their risk-management. | |
| 2. The testing programme referred to in paragraph 1 shall include testing campaigns comprising all necessary tests, notably considering the risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2). | |
| 3. | |
| Union space operators shall ensure that, prior to launch, or in the case of satellites part of a constellation, prior to the launch of the first batch of satellites, and at least every 3 years afterwards, they carry out Threat Led Penetration Testing (TLPT). | |
| The plan for testers carrying out a TLPT shall outline the scope and the methodology of the TLPT, the entity in charge of carrying out such test, the mitigation strategy for any risks which carrying out of a TLPT may entail. | |
| Testers carrying out TLPT shall comply with the following requirements: | |
| (a) they shall be of the highest suitability and reputability; | |
| (b) they shall possess all technical and organisational capabilities and shall demonstrate specific expertise in penetration testing; | |
| (c) they shall provide an independent assurance or an audit report; | |
| (d) they shall present a redress plan to address the identified risks. | |
| Testers that are external to the corporate structure of the Union space operators shall be certified by an accreditation body of a Member State or shall adhere to formal codes of conduct or ethical frameworks. They shall be fully covered by a relevant professional indemnity insurance against risks of misconduct and negligence. | |
| Union space operators shall monitor system failures and anomalies observed during the testing processes and evaluate their criticality. |
Or. en
Amendment 2892
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) they shall present a redress plan to address the identified risks. | (d) they shall present a plan for urgent intervention in the event of a critical situation and redress to address the identified risks, |
Or. ro
Justification
Like any activity, space activity needs provisions to manage risks, possible emergencies and possible interventions.
Amendment 2893
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) they shall demonstrate that they entertain no conflict of interest with the entity undergoing testing; |
Or. fr
Amendment 2894
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point d b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) they shall be certified by the national cybersecurity certification authority (NCCA) of a Member State in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/881. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2895
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| External testers shall draw up a report of the tests conducted, including the results thereof, and submit that report to the competent authority. Where necessary, the competent authority may then, acting either on its own initiative or in conjunction with the Agency, devise risk mitigation measures that the operator should take. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2896
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 89 | deleted |
| Learning and training | |
| 1. Union space operators shall provide their staff with appropriate training, in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. | |
| 2. All staff of Union space operators shall be adequately and continuously trained and shall follow the trainings referred to in point 7.1, of Annex VII. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall ensure that all staff receive tailored trainings in accordance with point 7.2, of Annex VII. | |
| 4. All security personnel working for the Union space operators shall have the required security skills and shall be adequately trained. | |
| 5. Staff of Union space operators operating in sensitive environments or handling sensitive equipment or data shall be regularly trained on the best methods and practices to carrying out such tasks. | |
| 6. Union space operators shall incorporate the lessons learned from the handling of incidents by updating business continuity plans, training sessions and staff testing programmes. |
Or. en
Amendment 2897
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 89 | deleted |
| Learning and training | |
| 1. Union space operators shall provide their staff with appropriate training, in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. | |
| 2. All staff of Union space operators shall be adequately and continuously trained and shall follow the trainings referred to in point 7.1, of Annex VII. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall ensure that all staff receive tailored trainings in accordance with point 7.2, of Annex VII. | |
| 4. All security personnel working for the Union space operators shall have the required security skills and shall be adequately trained. | |
| 5. Staff of Union space operators operating in sensitive environments or handling sensitive equipment or data shall be regularly trained on the best methods and practices to carrying out such tasks. | |
| 6. Union space operators shall incorporate the lessons learned from the handling of incidents by updating business continuity plans, training sessions and staff testing programmes. |
Or. en
Amendment 2898
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 89 | deleted |
| Learning and training | |
| 1. Union space operators shall provide their staff with appropriate training, in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. | |
| 2. All staff of Union space operators shall be adequately and continuously trained and shall follow the trainings referred to in point 7.1, of Annex VII. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall ensure that all staff receive tailored trainings in accordance with point 7.2, of Annex VII. | |
| 4. All security personnel working for the Union space operators shall have the required security skills and shall be adequately trained. | |
| 5. Staff of Union space operators operating in sensitive environments or handling sensitive equipment or data shall be regularly trained on the best methods and practices to carrying out such tasks. | |
| 6. Union space operators shall incorporate the lessons learned from the handling of incidents by updating business continuity plans, training sessions and staff testing programmes. |
Or. en
Amendment 2899
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators shall provide their staff with appropriate training, in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. | 1. Union space operators shall provide their staff with appropriate training, in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 based on their previous experience. |
Or. ro
Justification
Having highly qualified staff is essential in a field as complex and wide-ranging as space.
Amendment 2900
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall ensure that all staff receive tailored trainings in accordance with point 7.2, of Annex VII. | 3. Union space operators shall ensure that all staff, who already have experience in the field, receive tailored trainings in accordance with point 7.2, of Annex VII. |
Or. ro
Justification
Having highly qualified staff is essential in a field as complex and wide-ranging as space.
Amendment 2901
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. All security personnel working for the Union space operators shall have the required security skills and shall be adequately trained. | 4. All security personnel working for the Union space operators shall already have previous experience in the field and the required security skills and shall be adequately trained. |
Or. ro
Justification
Having highly qualified staff is essential in a field as complex and wide-ranging as space.
Amendment 2902
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Staff of Union space operators operating in sensitive environments or handling sensitive equipment or data shall be regularly trained on the best methods and practices to carrying out such tasks. | 5. Staff of Union space operators operating in sensitive environments or handling sensitive equipment or data shall already have experience in the field and be regularly trained on the best methods and practices to carrying out such tasks. |
Or. ro
Justification
Having highly qualified staff is essential in a field as complex and wide-ranging as space.
Amendment 2903
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 90
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 90 | deleted |
| Crisis communication and disclosure policy | |
| 1. Union space operators shall put in place a crisis communication strategy which shall enable responsible disclosure of significant incidents and shall be targeted to, and tailored for, each of the following categories: | |
| (a) staff involved in the execution of risk management tasks, notably response and response and recovery measures; | |
| (b) staff, other than that staff referred to in point (a), to the extent that communication to such staff is deemed appropriate for ensuring general corporate awareness, based on the need-to-know principle; | |
| (c) clients, to alert them of, and raise awareness of, significant cyber threats; | |
| (d) in the case of satellites hosting third-party payloads, where an incident has adverse impact on the satellite platform operations, the concerned third-party entity, according to a pre-defined agreement and following instructions set out in its response and disaster recovery plan. | |
| 2. At least one person in the corporate structure of Union space operators shall be responsible of the implementation of the communication strategy referred to in paragraph 1 and shall fulfil the function of media officer. |
Or. en
Amendment 2904
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 90
Proposal for a regulation
Article 90
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 90 | deleted |
| Crisis communication and disclosure policy | |
| 1. Union space operators shall put in place a crisis communication strategy which shall enable responsible disclosure of significant incidents and shall be targeted to, and tailored for, each of the following categories: | |
| (a) staff involved in the execution of risk management tasks, notably response and response and recovery measures; | |
| (b) staff, other than that staff referred to in point (a), to the extent that communication to such staff is deemed appropriate for ensuring general corporate awareness, based on the need-to-know principle; | |
| (c) clients, to alert them of, and raise awareness of, significant cyber threats; | |
| (d) in the case of satellites hosting third-party payloads, where an incident has adverse impact on the satellite platform operations, the concerned third-party entity, according to a pre-defined agreement and following instructions set out in its response and disaster recovery plan. | |
| 2. At least one person in the corporate structure of Union space operators shall be responsible of the implementation of the communication strategy referred to in paragraph 1 and shall fulfil the function of media officer. |
Or. en
Amendment 2905
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 90
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 90 | deleted |
| Crisis communication and disclosure policy | |
| 1. Union space operators shall put in place a crisis communication strategy which shall enable responsible disclosure of significant incidents and shall be targeted to, and tailored for, each of the following categories: | |
| (a) staff involved in the execution of risk management tasks, notably response and response and recovery measures; | |
| (b) staff, other than that staff referred to in point (a), to the extent that communication to such staff is deemed appropriate for ensuring general corporate awareness, based on the need-to-know principle; | |
| (c) clients, to alert them of, and raise awareness of, significant cyber threats; | |
| (d) in the case of satellites hosting third-party payloads, where an incident has adverse impact on the satellite platform operations, the concerned third-party entity, according to a pre-defined agreement and following instructions set out in its response and disaster recovery plan. | |
| 2. At least one person in the corporate structure of Union space operators shall be responsible of the implementation of the communication strategy referred to in paragraph 1 and shall fulfil the function of media officer. |
Or. en
Amendment 2906
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 90 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) the competent authority that granted authorisation for the activity; |
Or. fr
Amendment 2907
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 90 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) in cases involving assets owned by the Union, Commission, Parliament and Council; |
Or. fr
Amendment 2908
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 90 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dc) citizens of the Union, namely in the event of incidents that have an impact on public services or that relate to Union‑owned assets. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2909
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 91
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 91 | deleted |
| Handling of incidents | |
| 1. | |
| Union space operators shall establish and implement an incident management process that allows them to promptly detect, identify, handle and respond to incidents and to report significant incidents in accordance with Article 93. | |
| Union space operators shall set up roles and responsibilities in relation to the different types of incidents which shall be adapted to the different risk scenarios. | |
| 2. | |
| Union space operators shall ensure that at least the significant incidents are reported to the senior risk management staff immediately. | |
| The management body shall receive, on a regular basis, to be determined by the chief information security officer, the security manager or the senior risk management officer, sufficient information about the significant incident, an assessment of their impact, information about the response and recovery measures which have been taken and any additional controls and procedures to be established in the follow-up of that significant incident. | |
| 3. | |
| When a satellite hosts third-party payloads, and an incident has adverse impact on the satellite platform operations, Union space operators shall inform the concerned third-party entity and shall follow the instructions set out in the pre-defined agreements referred to in the second subparagraph and those set out in the response and disaster recovery plans. | |
| For those purposes of ensuring speed and effective handling of incidents, Union space operators shall conclude agreements with third-party entities for which a satellite host a payload. | |
| 4. Union space operators shall address the root causes of incidents to prevent the occurrence of future incidents. |
Or. en
Amendment 2910
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 91
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 91 | deleted |
| Handling of incidents | |
| 1. | |
| Union space operators shall establish and implement an incident management process that allows them to promptly detect, identify, handle and respond to incidents and to report significant incidents in accordance with Article 93. | |
| Union space operators shall set up roles and responsibilities in relation to the different types of incidents which shall be adapted to the different risk scenarios. | |
| 2. | |
| Union space operators shall ensure that at least the significant incidents are reported to the senior risk management staff immediately. | |
| The management body shall receive, on a regular basis, to be determined by the chief information security officer, the security manager or the senior risk management officer, sufficient information about the significant incident, an assessment of their impact, information about the response and recovery measures which have been taken and any additional controls and procedures to be established in the follow-up of that significant incident. | |
| 3. | |
| When a satellite hosts third-party payloads, and an incident has adverse impact on the satellite platform operations, Union space operators shall inform the concerned third-party entity and shall follow the instructions set out in the pre-defined agreements referred to in the second subparagraph and those set out in the response and disaster recovery plans. | |
| For those purposes of ensuring speed and effective handling of incidents, Union space operators shall conclude agreements with third-party entities for which a satellite host a payload. | |
| 4. Union space operators shall address the root causes of incidents to prevent the occurrence of future incidents. |
Or. en
Amendment 2911
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 91
Proposal for a regulation
Article 91
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 91 | deleted |
| Handling of incidents | |
| 1. | |
| Union space operators shall establish and implement an incident management process that allows them to promptly detect, identify, handle and respond to incidents and to report significant incidents in accordance with Article 93. | |
| Union space operators shall set up roles and responsibilities in relation to the different types of incidents which shall be adapted to the different risk scenarios. | |
| 2. | |
| Union space operators shall ensure that at least the significant incidents are reported to the senior risk management staff immediately. | |
| The management body shall receive, on a regular basis, to be determined by the chief information security officer, the security manager or the senior risk management officer, sufficient information about the significant incident, an assessment of their impact, information about the response and recovery measures which have been taken and any additional controls and procedures to be established in the follow-up of that significant incident. | |
| 3. | |
| When a satellite hosts third-party payloads, and an incident has adverse impact on the satellite platform operations, Union space operators shall inform the concerned third-party entity and shall follow the instructions set out in the pre-defined agreements referred to in the second subparagraph and those set out in the response and disaster recovery plans. | |
| For those purposes of ensuring speed and effective handling of incidents, Union space operators shall conclude agreements with third-party entities for which a satellite host a payload. | |
| 4. Union space operators shall address the root causes of incidents to prevent the occurrence of future incidents. |
Or. en
Amendment 2912
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 92 | deleted |
| Supply chain risk management | |
| 1. Union space operators shall establish a supply chain risk management framework. Their contracts with supplier manufacturers and service providers shall contain supply-chain security-related aspects in particular on information security requirements. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall base their supply chain risk management on a strategy to reduce risks in the supply chain which shall include at least the measures referred to in point 6, of Annex VII. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall establish an inventory of at least the critical assets of non-Union origin, which, considering the risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2), are needed to maintain an effective technical control of the space mission, such as the orbital control, with a view to supporting the analysis of the level of dependence of the space missions of the respective assets. | |
| 4. To allow the provisions of this Regulation to be adapted to scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to amend the list of requirements laid down in point 6, of Annex VII. |
Or. en
Amendment 2913
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 92 | deleted |
| Supply chain risk management | |
| 1. Union space operators shall establish a supply chain risk management framework. Their contracts with supplier manufacturers and service providers shall contain supply-chain security-related aspects in particular on information security requirements. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall base their supply chain risk management on a strategy to reduce risks in the supply chain which shall include at least the measures referred to in point 6, of Annex VII. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall establish an inventory of at least the critical assets of non-Union origin, which, considering the risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2), are needed to maintain an effective technical control of the space mission, such as the orbital control, with a view to supporting the analysis of the level of dependence of the space missions of the respective assets. | |
| 4. To allow the provisions of this Regulation to be adapted to scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to amend the list of requirements laid down in point 6, of Annex VII. |
Or. en
Amendment 2914
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 92 | deleted |
| Supply chain risk management | |
| 1. Union space operators shall establish a supply chain risk management framework. Their contracts with supplier manufacturers and service providers shall contain supply-chain security-related aspects in particular on information security requirements. | |
| 2. Union space operators shall base their supply chain risk management on a strategy to reduce risks in the supply chain which shall include at least the measures referred to in point 6, of Annex VII. | |
| 3. Union space operators shall establish an inventory of at least the critical assets of non-Union origin, which, considering the risk assessment referred to in Article 78(2), are needed to maintain an effective technical control of the space mission, such as the orbital control, with a view to supporting the analysis of the level of dependence of the space missions of the respective assets. | |
| 4. To allow the provisions of this Regulation to be adapted to scientific and technical progress, based on the best available techniques, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113, to amend the list of requirements laid down in point 6, of Annex VII. |
Or. en
Amendment 2915
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators shall establish a supply chain risk management framework. Their contracts with supplier manufacturers and service providers shall contain supply-chain security-related aspects in particular on information security requirements. | 1. Union space operators shall establish a supply chain risk management framework. Their contracts with supplier manufacturers and service providers shall contain supply-chain security-related aspects in particular on information access and information security requirements. |
Or. ro
Amendment 2916
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Title IV – Chapter II – Section 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Consequential deletion.
Amendment 2917
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Title IV – Chapter II – Section 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2918
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators shall report to the structure referred to in Article 34(4) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 significant incidents affecting the Union-owned assets. | 1. An incident shall be considered significant as provided for in Article 23(3) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555. Space operators shall report to the structure referred to in Article 34(4) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 significant incidents affecting the Union-owned assets. |
Or. en
Amendment 2919
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators shall report to the structure referred to in Article 34(4) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 significant incidents affecting the Union-owned assets. | 1. An incident shall be considered significant as provided for in Article 23(3) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555. |
Or. en
Amendment 2920
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, Union space operators shall report to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) the significant incidents affecting the assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21). The competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) shall in turn transmit a summary of each reported incident to the Agency. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2921
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, Union space operators shall report to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) the significant incidents affecting the assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21). The competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) shall in turn transmit a summary of each reported incident to the Agency. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2922
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 2
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, Union space operators shall report to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) the significant incidents affecting the assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21). The competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) shall in turn transmit a summary of each reported incident to the Agency. | 2. Union space operators shall report to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) the significant incidents affecting the assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21). The competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) shall in turn transmit a summary of each reported incident to the Agency. |
Or. en
Amendment 2923
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Where Union space operators qualify as essential or important entities pursuant to Annexes I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, the reporting referred to in paragraph 2, shall be carried out through the CSIRTs, established pursuant to Article 10 (1) of Directive 2022/2555 or, where applicable, the competent authority, established pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive 2022/2555, which shall, without delay, transmit all the relevant reported information to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1), including any technical support and feedback that such CSIRTs or authorities provided to space operators pursuant to Articles 23 of that Directive. | deleted |
| Where Union space operators have been identified as critical entities pursuant to Directive (EU) 2022/2557, Member States shall determine whether the reporting referred to in the first subparagraph shall be carried out by the Union space operators directly to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1), or to the authorities referred to in Article 15 of that Directive or by other means. | |
| The provisions of paragraph 7 shall in that case apply accordingly as regards the information to be transmitted. |
Or. en
Amendment 2924
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Union space operators qualify as essential or important entities pursuant to Annexes I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, the reporting referred to in paragraph 2, shall be carried out through the CSIRTs, established pursuant to Article 10 (1) of Directive 2022/2555 or, where applicable, the competent authority, established pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive 2022/2555, which shall, without delay, transmit all the relevant reported information to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1), including any technical support and feedback that such CSIRTs or authorities provided to space operators pursuant to Articles 23 of that Directive. | Where Union space operators qualify as essential or important entities pursuant to Annexes I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, the reporting referred to in paragraph 2, shall be carried out in accordance with that Directive. |
Or. en
Amendment 2925
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Union space operators qualify as essential or important entities pursuant to Annexes I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, the reporting referred to in paragraph 2, shall be carried out through the CSIRTs, established pursuant to Article 10 (1) of Directive 2022/2555 or, where applicable, the competent authority, established pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive 2022/2555, which shall, without delay, transmit all the relevant reported information to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1), including any technical support and feedback that such CSIRTs or authorities provided to space operators pursuant to Articles 23 of that Directive. | Where space operators qualify as essential or important entities pursuant to Annexes I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, the reporting referred to in paragraph 2 and 3, shall be carried out in accordance with Article 23 of that Directive. |
Or. en
Amendment 2926
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Union space operators have been identified as critical entities pursuant to Directive (EU) 2022/2557, Member States shall determine whether the reporting referred to in the first subparagraph shall be carried out by the Union space operators directly to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1), or to the authorities referred to in Article 15 of that Directive or by other means. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2927
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Union space operators have been identified as critical entities pursuant to Directive (EU) 2022/2557, Member States shall determine whether the reporting referred to in the first subparagraph shall be carried out by the Union space operators directly to the competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1), or to the authorities referred to in Article 15 of that Directive or by other means. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2928
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The provisions of paragraph 7 shall in that case apply accordingly as regards the information to be transmitted. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2929
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The provisions of paragraph 7 shall in that case apply accordingly as regards the information to be transmitted. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2930
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 4
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. For Union space operators qualifying as essential or important entities pursuant to Annexes I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, or which are identified as critical entities pursuant to Directive (EU) 2022/2557, respectively, the reporting requirement referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be without prejudice to the reporting obligations provided for in Article 23 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 or the notification obligations provided for in Article 15(1) and (2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, respectively. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2931
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. For Union space operators qualifying as essential or important entities pursuant to Annexes I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, or which are identified as critical entities pursuant to Directive (EU) 2022/2557, respectively, the reporting requirement referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be without prejudice to the reporting obligations provided for in Article 23 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 or the notification obligations provided for in Article 15(1) and (2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, respectively. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2932
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. For Union space operators qualifying as essential or important entities pursuant to Annexes I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, or which are identified as critical entities pursuant to Directive (EU) 2022/2557, respectively, the reporting requirement referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be without prejudice to the reporting obligations provided for in Article 23 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 or the notification obligations provided for in Article 15(1) and (2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, respectively. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2933
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Without prejudice to the technical input, advice, remedies and subsequent follow-up which may be provided, as applicable, in accordance with national law, by the CSIRTs, in accordance with Article 11 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, competent authorities may provide feedback to Union space operators, by making available any relevant anonymised information on cyber threats and may discuss remedies or ways to minimise and mitigate potential adverse impact across borders. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2934
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Without prejudice to the technical input, advice, remedies and subsequent follow-up which may be provided, as applicable, in accordance with national law, by the CSIRTs, in accordance with Article 11 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, competent authorities may provide feedback to Union space operators, by making available any relevant anonymised information on cyber threats and may discuss remedies or ways to minimise and mitigate potential adverse impact across borders. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2935
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. An incident shall be considered significant if: | deleted |
| (a) it has caused or can cause a severe operational disruption of space activities carried out by Union space operators, or of services provided, or considerable financial loss for the Union space operators concerned; | |
| (b) it has an impact on, or can impact, other natural or legal persons by causing considerable material or non-material damage. |
Or. en
Amendment 2936
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 6
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. An incident shall be considered significant if: | deleted |
| (a) it has caused or can cause a severe operational disruption of space activities carried out by Union space operators, or of services provided, or considerable financial loss for the Union space operators concerned; | |
| (b) it has an impact on, or can impact, other natural or legal persons by causing considerable material or non-material damage. |
Or. en
Amendment 2937
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. An incident shall be considered significant if: | deleted |
| (a) it has caused or can cause a severe operational disruption of space activities carried out by Union space operators, or of services provided, or considerable financial loss for the Union space operators concerned; | |
| (b) it has an impact on, or can impact, other natural or legal persons by causing considerable material or non-material damage. |
Or. en
Amendment 2938
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 6 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) it has caused or can cause a severe operational disruption of space activities carried out by Union space operators, or of services provided, or considerable financial loss for the Union space operators concerned; | (a) it has caused or can cause a severe operational disruption of space activities carried out by Union space operators, or of services provided, and a temporary or longer interruption, or considerable financial loss for the Union space operators concerned; |
Or. ro
Justification
Incidents of any kind and any technical nature cannot always be foreseen, including in this field, for which reason there must be clear procedures for communication and coordination with the competent authorities in such situations to find solutions swiftly.
Amendment 2939
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Union space operators shall submit to the Agency, as regards the requirement referred to in paragraph 1, and respectively to the competent authorities, as regards the requirement referred to in paragraph 2, the following information: | Where space operators do not qualify as essential or important entities in accordance with Directive (EU) 2022/2555, they shall submit to the CSIRT established in accordance with Article 10 of that Directive or, where applicable, to the competent authority established in accordance with Article 8 of that Directive, the following information: |
Or. en
Amendment 2940
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Union space operators shall submit to the Agency, as regards the requirement referred to in paragraph 1, and respectively to the competent authorities, as regards the requirement referred to in paragraph 2, the following information: | Where Union space operators do not qualify as essential or important entities in accordance with Directive (EU) 2022/2555, they shall submit to the CSIRT established in accordance with article 10 of that Directive and to the national competent authority under this Regulation the following information: |
Or. en
Amendment 2941
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) without undue delay, and in any event within 12 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, as regards the Union-owned assets, and within 24 hours for assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21), respectively, an early warning which shall indicate whether the significant incident may have been caused by unlawful or malicious acts, or if it could have a cross-border impact; | (a) without delay, and in any event within 12 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident an early warning which shall indicate whether the significant incident may have been caused by unlawful or malicious acts, or if it could have a cross-border impact; |
Or. en
Amendment 2942
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) without undue delay, and in any event within 12 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, as regards the Union-owned assets, and within 24 hours for assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21), respectively, an early warning which shall indicate whether the significant incident may have been caused by unlawful or malicious acts, or if it could have a cross-border impact; | (a) without undue delay, and in any event within 24 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, an early warning which, where applicable, shall indicate whether the significant incident significant incident is suspected of being caused by unlawful or malicious acts, or could have a cross-border impact; |
Or. en
Justification
We recommend retaining the original text of NIS 2 Directive in order to ensure uniformity in the application of the law
Amendment 2943
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) without undue delay, and in any event within 72 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, a report, which shall update the information referred to in point (a), and shall provide an initial assessment of the significant incident, including its severity and impact, as well as, where available, the indicators of compromise; | (b) without undue delay, and in any event within 72 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, an incident notification, which, where applicable, shall update the information referred to in point (a), and indicate an initial assessment of the significant incident, including its severity and impact, as well as, where available, the indicators of compromise; |
Or. en
Amendment 2944
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) without undue delay, and in any event within 72 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, a report, which shall update the information referred to in point (a), and shall provide an initial assessment of the significant incident, including its severity and impact, as well as, where available, the indicators of compromise; | (b) without delay, and in any event within 72 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, a report which shall update the information referred to in point (a), and shall provide an initial assessment of the significant incident, including its severity and impact, as well as, where available, the indicators of compromise; |
Or. en
Amendment 2945
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) upon the request of the competent authority, or as applicable, of the Agency, an intermediate report with relevant status updates; | (c) upon the request of the CSIRT or, where applicable, the competent authority an intermediate report on relevant status updates; |
Or. en
Amendment 2946
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) upon the request of the competent authority, or as applicable, of the Agency, an intermediate report with relevant status updates; | (c) upon the request of the CSIRT and the national competent authority, or as applicable, of the Agency, an intermediate report with relevant status updates; |
Or. en
Amendment 2947
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) upon the request of the competent authority, or as applicable, of the Agency, an intermediate report with relevant status updates; | (c) upon the request of the CSIRT or competent, an intermediate report with relevant status updates; |
Or. en
Amendment 2948
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d – introductory part
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) a final report, not later than 1 month after the submission of the report referred to in point (b), including the following: | (d) a final report, not later than 1 month after the submission of the incident notification under point (b), including the following: |
Or. en
Amendment 2949
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point i
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) a detailed description of the significant incident, including its severity and impact; | (i) a detailed description of the incident, including its severity and impact; |
Or. en
Amendment 2950
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point ii
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point ii
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ii) the type of threat or the root cause that is likely to have triggered that significant incident; | (ii) the type of threat or the root cause that is likely to have triggered that incident; |
Or. en
Amendment 2951
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point iii
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (iii) the applied and ongoing mitigation measures; | (iii) the applied and ongoing mitigation measures and intervention and cooperation for intervention measures, if applicable; |
Or. ro
Justification
Incidents of any kind and any technical nature cannot always be foreseen, including in this field, for which reason there must be clear procedures for communication and coordination with the competent authorities in such situations to find solutions swiftly.
Amendment 2952
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point iv
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point iv
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (iv) as applicable, the cross-border impact of the significant incident; | (iv) as applicable, the cross-border impact of the incident; |
Or. en
Amendment 2953
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) if a significant incident is still ongoing at the time of the submission of the final report referred to in point (d), a progress report at that time, as well as a final report within 1 month from the date of the handling the significant incident. | (e) if an incident is still ongoing at the time of the submission of the final report referred to in point (d), a progress report at that time, as well as a final report within 1 month from the date of the handling the incident. |
Or. en
Amendment 2954
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 113, to supplement this Regulation, by specifying the criteria to determine what constitutes a severe operational disruption of space activities, or of services provided by a Union space operator, as referred to in paragraph 6, point (a), including the relevant materiality thresholds. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2955
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 113, to supplement this Regulation, by specifying the criteria to determine what constitutes a severe operational disruption of space activities, or of services provided by a Union space operator, as referred to in paragraph 6, point (a), including the relevant materiality thresholds. | The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 113, to supplement this Regulation, by specifying the criteria to determine what constitutes a severe operational disruption of space activities, or of services provided by a space operator, as referred to in paragraph 6, point (a), including the relevant materiality thresholds. |
Or. en
Amendment 2956
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 8
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify in further detail the content of the information to be reported pursuant to paragraph 7, and to lay down the templates and procedures for the reporting of that information. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2957
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 8 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8 a. The CSIRTs established pursuant to Article 10, point (1), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 or the competent authority established pursuant to Article 8, point (1), of that Directive shall, without delay, transmit all the relevant reported information to the national competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) of this Regulation. Those national competent authorities shall in turn transmit a summary of each reported incident to the Agency. |
Or. en
Amendment 2958
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 8 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8 b. By derogation to paragraph 7, Union space operators of Union-owned assets shall report significant incidents affecting the Union-owned assets to the structure referred to in Article 34(4) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696. In addition, they shall: | |
| (a) send the early warning within 12 hours, indicating whether the significant incident may have been caused by unlawful or malicious acts, or if it could have a cross-border impact; and | |
| (b) send an intermediate report with relevant status updates upon request of the Agency. |
Or. en
Amendment 2959
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 8 c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8 c. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 113, to specify in further detail the content of the information to be reported pursuant to paragraph 10 and 11, and to lay down the templates and procedures for the reporting of that information. |
Or. en
Amendment 2960
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article93a | |
| Reporting of significant incidents | |
| 1. An incident shall be considered significant as provided for in Article 23 (3) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555. | |
| 2. Where Union space operators qualify as essential or important entities pursuant to Annexes I or II of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, the reporting referred to in paragraph 3, shall be carried out in accordance with Article 23 of that Directive. | |
| 3. Where Union space operators do not qualify as essential or important entities in accordance with Directive (EU) 2022/2555, they shall submit to CSIRT established in accordance with Article 10 of that Directive or, where applicable, to the national competent authority estabslished in accordance with Article 8 of that Directive, the following information: | |
| (a) without undue delay, and in any event within 24 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, , an early warning which shall indicate whether the significant incident may have been caused by unlawful or malicious acts, or if it could have a cross-border impact; | |
| (b) without undue delay, and in any event within 72 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, an incident notification which, where applicable, shall update the information referred to in point (a), and shall provide an initial assessment of the significant incident, including its severity and impact, as well as, where available, the indicators of compromise; | |
| (c) upon the request of the CSIRT or national competent authority an intermediate report with relevant status updates; | |
| (d) a final report, nolater than 1 month after the submission of the report referred to in point (b), including the following: | |
| (i) a detailed description of the significant incident, including its severity and impact; | |
| (ii) the type of threat or the root cause that is likely to have triggered that significant incident; | |
| (iii) the applied and ongoing mitigation measures; | |
| (iv) as applicable, the cross-border impact of the significant incident; | |
| (e) if a significant incident is still ongoing at the time of the submission of the final report referred to in point (d), a progress report at that time, as well as a final report within 1 month from the date of the handling the significant incident. | |
| 4. The CSIRTs established pursuant to Article 10, point (1), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 or the national competent authority established pursuant to Article 8, point (1), of that Directive shall, without delay, transmit all the relevant reported information to the national competent authorities referred to in Article 28(1) of this Regulation. Those national competent authorities shall in turn transmit a summary of each reported incident to the Agency. | |
| 5. By derogation to paragraph 7, Union space operators of Union-owned assets shall report significant incidents affecting the Union-owned assets to the structure referred to in Article 34(4) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696. In addition, they shall: | |
| (a) send the early warning within 12 hours, indicating whether the significant incident may have been caused by unlawful or malicious acts, or if it could have a cross-border impact; | |
| (b) send an intermediate report with relevant status updates upon request of the Agency. | |
| 6. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify in further detail the content of the information to be reported pursuant to paragraph and 4a, and to lay down the templates and procedures for the reporting of that information. |
Or. en
Amendment 2961
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Union Space Resilience Network (‘EUSRN’) is established to support coordination and exchanges between the Agency and the competent authorities in fulfilling their respective mandates as regards Union-owned assets and respectively the assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21). | 1. The Union Space Resilience Network (‘EUSRN’) is established to support coordination and exchanges between the Agency and the competent authorities in fulfilling their respective mandates as regards Union-owned assets and respectively governmental and non-governmental assets. |
Or. en
Amendment 2962
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) to ensure consistent approaches among the competent authorities when providing the advice and support referred to in Article 93(5), and support the Union space operators in achieving coherence in their monitoring and handling of significant incidents; | (a) to ensure consistent approaches among the competent authorities and support the Union space operators in achieving coherence in their monitoring and handling of significant incidents; |
Or. en
Amendment 2963
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) to ensure consistent approaches among the competent authorities when providing the advice and support referred to in Article 93(5), and support the Union space operators in achieving coherence in their monitoring and handling of significant incidents; | (a) to ensure consistent approaches among the competent authorities when providing the advice and support referred to in Article 93(5), and support the space operators in achieving coherence in their monitoring and handling of significant incidents; |
Or. en
Amendment 2964
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 2 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) to prevent, as regards significant incidents affecting the assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21), adverse impacts in the functioning of the Union Space Programme referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2021/696, as well as to promote, for that purpose, the necessary coordination and to support the adoption, by the Commission and the Agency, of measures needed to mitigate such adverse impacts, under the mandates conferred by Articles 28, 29 and 34 of Regulation (EU) 2021/696, with a view to fulfil the objectives laid down in Article 4(1), point (c), of that Regulation; | (b) to prevent, as regards significant incidents affecting governmental and non-governmental assets, adverse impacts in the functioning of the Union Space Programme referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2021/696, as well as to promote, for that purpose, the necessary coordination and to support the adoption, by the Commission and the Agency, of measures needed to mitigate such adverse impacts, under the mandates conferred by Articles 28, 29 and 34 of Regulation (EU) 2021/696, with a view to fulfil the objectives laid down in Article 4(1), point (c), of that Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 2965
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 2 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) organise joint meetings with the NIS Cooperation Group established pursuant to Article 14(1) or EU-CyCLONe established pursuant to Article 16 (1) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to exchange relevant information in relation to the space sector concerning cyber threats, incidents, vulnerabilities, awareness raising initiatives, trainings, exercises and skills, capacity building, standards and technical specifications. | (e) organise joint meetings with the NIS Cooperation Group established pursuant to Article 14(1) or EU-CyCLONe established pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to exchange relevant information in relation to the space sector concerning identification of cyber threats, incidents and rapid response measures where necessary, vulnerabilities, awareness raising and information initiatives, trainings, exercises and skills, capacity building, standards and technical specifications. |
Or. ro
Justification
Incidents of any kind and any technical nature cannot always be foreseen, including in this field, for which reason there must be clear procedures for communication and coordination with the competent authorities in such situations to find solutions swiftly.
Amendment 2966
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The EUSRN shall be composed of representatives of competent authorities, the Commission, the Agency and the European External Action Service (EEAS). | The EUSRN shall be composed of representatives of competent authorities, the Commission, the Agency and the European External Action Service (EEAS). International organisations, such as ESA, shall attend as observer when the EUSRN shall discuss matters of common interest. |
Or. en
Amendment 2967
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The EUSRN shall, on a regular basis, exchange information with, and report to, the computer security incident response teams network (‘CSIRTs network’) referred to in Article 15 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, to ENISA and to the European Cyber Crisis Liaison Organisation Network (EU-CyCLONe) referred to in Article 16 of that Directive, with a view to provide situational updates and assessments in relation to significant incidents impacting the assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21), of this Regulation, and to discuss any potential consequences that significant incidents may entail upon other sectors and services falling within the scope of that Directive. | 4. The EUSRN shall, on a regular basis, exchange information with, and report to, the computer security incident response teams network (‘CSIRTs network’) referred to in Article 15 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, to ENISA and to the European Cyber Crisis Liaison Organisation Network (EU-CyCLONe) referred to in Article 16 of that Directive, with a view to provide situational updates and assessments in relation to significant incidents impacting the assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21), of this Regulation, if incidents have occurred, or in order to identify possible new incidents, and to discuss any potential consequences that significant incidents may entail upon other sectors and services falling within the scope of that Directive, as well as rapid response measures, including through wider cooperation, where necessary. |
Or. ro
Justification
Incidents of any kind and any technical nature cannot always be foreseen, including in this field, for which reason there must be clear procedures for communication and coordination with the competent authorities in such situations to find solutions swiftly.
Amendment 2968
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Title IV – Chapter II – Section 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 [...] | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2969
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Title IV – Chapter II – Section 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2970
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2971
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators may, on a voluntary basis, exchange among themselves relevant information in the area of cybersecurity, including relevant information on cyber-attacks, cyber threats, electronic interferences such as jamming, spoofing, information on indicators of compromise, adversarial tactics, techniques and procedures, near misses, vulnerabilities, threat-actor-specific information, and share cybersecurity alerts and recommendations for the configuration of cybersecurity tools allowing detection of cyberattacks, to the extent that such information sharing: | 1. Space operators shall regularly exchange relevant information in the area of cybersecurity, including relevant information on cyber-attacks, cyber threats, electronic interferences such as jamming, spoofing, information on indicators of compromise, adversarial tactics, techniques and procedures, near misses, vulnerabilities, threat-actor-specific information, and share cybersecurity alerts and recommendations for the configuration of cybersecurity tools allowing detection of cyberattacks, to the extent that such information sharing: |
Or. en
Amendment 2972
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators may, on a voluntary basis, exchange among themselves relevant information in the area of cybersecurity, including relevant information on cyber-attacks, cyber threats, electronic interferences such as jamming, spoofing, information on indicators of compromise, adversarial tactics, techniques and procedures, near misses, vulnerabilities, threat-actor-specific information, and share cybersecurity alerts and recommendations for the configuration of cybersecurity tools allowing detection of cyberattacks, to the extent that such information sharing: | 1. Space operators active in the Union are required to exchange among themselves relevant information in the area of cybersecurity, including relevant information on cyber-attacks, cyber threats, electronic interferences such as jamming, spoofing, information on indicators of compromise, adversarial tactics, techniques and procedures, near misses, vulnerabilities, threat-actor-specific information, and share cybersecurity alerts and recommendations for the configuration of cybersecurity tools allowing detection of cyberattacks, to the extent that such information sharing: |
Or. fr
Amendment 2973
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) takes places within trusted communities of Union space operators; | (c) takes places within trusted communities of Union space operators, on the basis of an information access protocol which must include staff who have access and the period for which they have access authorisation; |
Or. ro
Justification
A European and international regulatory framework for database access is beneficial for all operators in the field.
Amendment 2974
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) is implemented through arrangements that protect the potentially sensitive nature of the information shared and are governed by rules of conduct, in full respect of business confidentiality, of the rules on the protection of personal data, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, and the guidelines on competition policy. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 2975
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) does not jeopardise the protection of the essential security and defence interests of the Member States and the Union, and does not pertain to any classified or sensitive information thereon. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2976
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 2
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1, point (d), shall: | deleted |
| (a) specify the conditions to enter, and the rules to participate in, information-sharing arrangements, as well as the type of information to be shared; | |
| (b) specify the operational aspects, such as use of dedicated ICT platforms and automation tools; | |
| (c) set out the details governing the involvement of public authorities in the information-sharing arrangements and the capacity in which those authorities may participate in such arrangements. |
Or. en
Amendment 2977
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) specify the conditions to enter, and the rules to participate in, information-sharing arrangements, as well as the type of information to be shared; | (a) specify the conditions to enter, and the rules to participate in, information-sharing arrangements, as well as the type of information to be shared and the manner and period of access to it; |
Or. ro
Justification
A European and international regulatory framework for database access is beneficial for all operators in the space field.
Amendment 2978
Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) set out the details governing the involvement of public authorities in the information-sharing arrangements and the capacity in which those authorities may participate in such arrangements. | (c) set out the details governing the involvement of public authorities in the information-sharing arrangements and the capacity in which those authorities may participate in such arrangements, as well as the persons within these authorities who have access to information and the clearly specified period of access. |
Or. ro
Justification
Database access must be regulated for all operators and actors in the field.
Amendment 2979
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 3
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall notify competent authorities of their participation in the cybersecurity information-sharing arrangements referred to in paragraph 1, upon entry into, and exit from, such arrangements. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2980
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall notify competent authorities of their participation in the cybersecurity information-sharing arrangements referred to in paragraph 1, upon entry into, and exit from, such arrangements. | 3. Space operators shall notify competent authorities of their participation in the cybersecurity information-sharing arrangements referred to in paragraph 1, upon entry into, and exit from, such arrangements. |
Or. en
Amendment 2981
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 4
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission, shall, with the assistance of the Agency, facilitate the establishment of cybersecurity information-sharing arrangements referred to in paragraph 1, point (d), by supporting or promoting the activities of EU Space Information Sharing and Analysis Centre. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2982
Andi Cristea
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 95a | |
| Information sharing on environment and climate data | |
| Union space operators providing space-based Earth Observation data shall share data on climate and the environment. The Agency shall make this data available and easily accessible to the competent authorities and other relevant research institutes. |
Or. en
Amendment 2983
Virgil-Daniel Popescu
Proposal for a regulation
Article 95 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 95a | |
| Information sharing on environment and climate data | |
| Union space operators providing space-based Earth Observation data shall share data on climate and the environment. The Agency shall make this data available and easily accessible to the competent authorities and other relevant research institutes. |
Or. en
Amendment 2984
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Title IV – Chapter III – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| III ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY OF SPACE ACTIVITIES | III ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY |
Or. en
Amendment 2985
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Sustainability shall cover sustainability in space and sustainability on Earth (environmental sustainability). | 1. Environmental sustainability shall encompass both sustainability in space and sustainability on Earth, provided that its monitoring and reporting do not undermine the competitiveness of businesses. |
Or. en
Amendment 2986
Markus Buchheit
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Sustainability shall cover sustainability in space and sustainability on Earth (environmental sustainability). | 1. The term “sustainability” encompasses sustainability in space. |
Or. en
Amendment 2987
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Sustainability shall cover sustainability in space and sustainability on Earth (environmental sustainability). | 1. Sustainability shall cover environmental sustainability in space and on Earth. |
Or. en
Amendment 2988
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Sustainability shall cover sustainability in space and sustainability on Earth (environmental sustainability). | 1. Environmental sustainability shall cover sustainability on Earth and sustainability in space. |
Or. en
Amendment 2989
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1 a. In the implementation of this Regulation, the Union shall ensure that obligations relating to environmental sustainability are strictly proportionate, based on a cost-benefit analysis and do not undermine the competitiveness of the European space industry or its capacity to innovate. |
Or. en
Amendment 2990
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, except for those referred to in Article 10(4), shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2991
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, except for those referred to in Article 10(4), shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out. | 2. Space operators, except for those referred to in Article 10(4), shall, in cooperation with their supplier, calculate the Environmental Footprint of the space activities they carry out according to the calculation method referred to in Article 97. |
Or. en
Amendment 2992
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 2
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, except for those referred to in Article 10(4), shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out. | 2. Union space operators, except for those referred to in Article 10(4), may estimate the Environmental Footprint (EF) of the space activities they carry out in accordance with Article 97. |
Or. en
Amendment 2993
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, except for those referred to in Article 10(4), shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out. | 2. Union space operators shall estimate the Environmental Footprint (EF) of the space activities they carry out in accordance with Article 97 of this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 2994
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, except for those referred to in Article 10(4), shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out. | 2. Space operators shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out. |
Or. en
Amendment 2995
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, except for those referred to in Article 10(4), shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out. | 2. Union space operators shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out. |
Or. en
Justification
Removing the carve-out for certain Union operators from the EF calculation obligation ensures universal application of the environmental transparency framework. The EF declaration is a transparency tool, not a compliance burden that justifies selective application; all operators providing services in the Union should calculate and disclose their environmental footprint on equal terms.
Amendment 2996
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, except for those referred to in Article 10(4), shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out. | 2. Space operators active in the Union shall calculate the EF of the space activities they carry out, in accordance with Article 97 of this Regulation. |
Or. fr
Amendment 2997
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by Union space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2998
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by Union space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 2999
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by Union space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3000
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by Union space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. | 3. Union space operators shall work closely with their suppliers to provide to the extent possible data needed by Union space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. |
| To ensure sufficient protection of confidential and proprietary information, they shall not require suppliers to disclose information beyond what is necessary to provide the assessment of the EF. | |
| Suppliers which qualify as mid-cap enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises shall benefit from the exemptions in this Article. |
Or. en
Amendment 3001
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by Union space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. | 3. Space operators active in the Union shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by Union space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3002
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by Union space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. | 3. Space operators shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 3003
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Union space operators shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by Union space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. | 3. Space operators shall by contract require their suppliers to provide all data needed by space operators to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 2. |
Or. en
Amendment 3004
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. As part of the application for authorisation referred to in Article 6, applicants shall submit an Environmental Footprint Declaration (‘EFD’) to competent authorities. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3005
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. As part of the application for authorisation referred to in Article 6, applicants shall submit an Environmental Footprint Declaration (‘EFD’) to competent authorities. | 4. As part of the application for authorisation referred to in Article 6, applicants shall submit an Environmental Footprint Declaration (‘EFD’) to competent authorities, which shall make the EFD available to the public forthwith. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3006
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 4
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. As part of the application for authorisation referred to in Article 6, applicants shall submit an Environmental Footprint Declaration (‘EFD’) to competent authorities. | 4. Union space operators, except those referred to in Article 10(4) may submit an Environmental Footprint Declaration (‘EFD’) to competent authorities. |
Or. en
Amendment 3007
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. If the necessary data required for the calculation method referred to in article 97 are not available at the time of the application for authorisation, an estimate is permitted. In that case, the space operator shall update the calculation during the different phases of the relevant mission, including the Critical Design Review, and whenever the necessary data become avaible. |
Or. en
Amendment 3008
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The EFD shall attest that the Union space operators have calculated, in accordance with Article 97, the EF of the space activities they intend to carry out. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3009
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The EFD shall attest that the Union space operators have calculated, in accordance with Article 97, the EF of the space activities they intend to carry out. | 5. The EFD shall attest that the Union space operators have estimated, in accordance with Article 97, the EF of the space activities they intend to carry out. |
Or. en
Amendment 3010
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The EFD shall attest that the Union space operators have calculated, in accordance with Article 97, the EF of the space activities they intend to carry out. | 5. The EFD shall attest that the space operators have calculated, in accordance with Article 97, the EF of the space activities they intend to carry out. |
Or. en
Amendment 3011
Katri Kulmuni
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The EFD shall attest that the Union space operators have calculated, in accordance with Article 97, the EF of the space activities they intend to carry out. | 5. The EFD shall attest that the space operators have calculated, in accordance with Article 97, the EF of the space activities they intend to carry out. |
Or. en
Amendment 3012
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The EFD shall attest that the Union space operators have calculated, in accordance with Article 97, the EF of the space activities they intend to carry out. | 5. The EFD shall attest that the space operators have calculated, in accordance with Article 97, the EF of the space activities they intend to carry out. |
Or. en
Amendment 3013
Julie Rechagneux, Aleksandar Nikolic, Mélanie Disdier, Pascale Piera, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Christophe Bay, Marion Maréchal
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5 a. The Commission shall ensure convergence with the ESA Life Cycle Assessment database and shall make use of existing datasets developed and maintained by ESA in order to avoid duplication of efforts, improve data quality and reduce administrative burden for operators. |
Or. en
Amendment 3014
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. The EFD referred to in paragraph 4 shall be accompanied by all of the following: | deleted |
| (a) an EF certificate which shall be delivered in accordance with Article 98(2); | |
| (b) the EF study supporting the results of the EFD; | |
| (c) the aggregated and disaggregated datasets on the basis of the EF which has been calculated in accordance with paragraph 2; | |
| (d) the proof of transmission of the aggregated and disaggregated datasets to the Commission, in accordance with Article 99(1), first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Amendment 3015
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. The EFD referred to in paragraph 4 shall be accompanied by all of the following: | 6. Union space operators shall submit, where appropriate, the following in their application: |
Or. en
Amendment 3016
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. The EFD referred to in paragraph 4 shall be accompanied by all of the following: | 6. The EFD referred to in paragraph 4 shall contain the following information: |
Or. en
Amendment 3017
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point -a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (-a) the updated contact details of the Union space operator; |
Or. en
Amendment 3018
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point -a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (-a a) information about the type of space activities that are planned to be carried out; |
Or. en
Amendment 3019
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) an EF certificate which shall be delivered in accordance with Article 98(2); | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3020
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point a
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) an EF certificate which shall be delivered in accordance with Article 98(2); | (a) An environmental footprint declaration (EFD) containing: |
Or. en
Amendment 3021
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point a a (new)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a a) (i) contact details of the Union space operator; | |
| (ii) information about the type of space activities. |
Or. en
Amendment 3022
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the EF study supporting the results of the EFD; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3023
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point b
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the EF study supporting the results of the EFD; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3024
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the EF study supporting the results of the EFD; | (b) the EF study supporting the results of the EFD, including a reference to existing datasets ; |
Or. en
Amendment 3025
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point c
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the aggregated and disaggregated datasets on the basis of the EF which has been calculated in accordance with paragraph 2; | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3026
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the aggregated and disaggregated datasets on the basis of the EF which has been calculated in accordance with paragraph 2; | (c) the specific aggregated datasets on the basis of the EF which has been estimated in accordance with paragraph 2;; |
Or. en
Amendment 3027
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point d
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the proof of transmission of the aggregated and disaggregated datasets to the Commission, in accordance with Article 99(1), first subparagraph. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3028
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the proof of transmission of the aggregated and disaggregated datasets to the Commission, in accordance with Article 99(1), first subparagraph. | (d) the proofs of receipt of the aggregated datasets by the Commission, in accordance with Article 99(1), first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Amendment 3029
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 6 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) a detailed description of the measures already taken or intended to be taken to reduce the overall EF of the activities concerned, including action in the areas of eco-design, resource efficiency, emissions reductions and waste management, both for activities on the ground and in the air. This description shall be accompanied by a forward-looking analysis outlining the overall EF reduction strategy, the specific targets to be achieved, the relevant timeframes and the resources to be deployed in order to carry out the strategy and follow up on it effectively. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3030
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The EFD shall contain the following information: | deleted |
| (a) the name, the registered trade name or registered trademark of the Union space operators, their postal address and electronic means of communication; | |
| (b) information about the type of space activities that are planned to be carried out and the type of products, substances or materials to which the EFD applies; | |
| (c) the proof that the EF that has been calculated and verified in accordance with the calculation and verification rules laid down in the implemented act adopted pursuant to Article 97(4); | |
| (d) the EF performance class to which the spacecraft belongs to, in accordance with the rules laid down in the implemented act adopted pursuant to Article 97(4); | |
| The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Amendment 3031
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The EFD shall contain the following information: | deleted |
| (a) the name, the registered trade name or registered trademark of the Union space operators, their postal address and electronic means of communication; | |
| (b) information about the type of space activities that are planned to be carried out and the type of products, substances or materials to which the EFD applies; | |
| (c) the proof that the EF that has been calculated and verified in accordance with the calculation and verification rules laid down in the implemented act adopted pursuant to Article 97(4); | |
| (d) the EF performance class to which the spacecraft belongs to, in accordance with the rules laid down in the implemented act adopted pursuant to Article 97(4); | |
| The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Amendment 3032
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The EFD shall contain the following information: | deleted |
| (a) the name, the registered trade name or registered trademark of the Union space operators, their postal address and electronic means of communication; | |
| (b) information about the type of space activities that are planned to be carried out and the type of products, substances or materials to which the EFD applies; | |
| (c) the proof that the EF that has been calculated and verified in accordance with the calculation and verification rules laid down in the implemented act adopted pursuant to Article 97(4); | |
| (d) the EF performance class to which the spacecraft belongs to, in accordance with the rules laid down in the implemented act adopted pursuant to Article 97(4); |
Or. en
Amendment 3033
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the name, the registered trade name or registered trademark of the Union space operators, their postal address and electronic means of communication; | (a) the name, the registered trade name or registered trademark of the space operators, their postal address and electronic means of communication; |
Or. en
Amendment 3034
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the name, the registered trade name or registered trademark of the Union space operators, their postal address and electronic means of communication; | (a) the name, the registered trade name or registered trademark of the space operators, their postal address and electronic means of communication; |
Or. en
Amendment 3035
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the name, the registered trade name or registered trademark of the Union space operators, their postal address and electronic means of communication; | (a) the name, the registered trade name or registered trademark of the space operators, their postal address and electronic means of communication; |
Or. en
Amendment 3036
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) information about the type of space activities that are planned to be carried out and the type of products, substances or materials to which the EFD applies; | (b) information about the type of space activities that are planned to be carried out, the objectives thereof and the type of products, substances or materials to which the EFD applies; |
Or. fr
Amendment 3037
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3038
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. | The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph, and to establish EF limits that would preclude authorisation from being granted under Article 6. |
| Within two years of the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall, pursuant to Article 113, adopt delegated acts specifying the objectives and measures that should be taken to reduce the environmental impact of space activities, in line with the 2050 emissions reduction target. These delegated acts shall be reviewed on a regular basis in order to take scientific and technological developments into account and adapt to new findings on the environmental impact of space activities. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3039
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. | Six months after the entry in force of this Regulation, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Justification
Setting a mandatory 6-month deadline for the Commission to adopt the EF template implementing act ensures operators have clarity on reporting format before the Regulation's application date. Without a deadline, the risk of the implementing act arriving after application is real and would make the EF obligation unenforceable from day one.
Amendment 3040
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. | By 1 January 2028, the Commission is empowered shall adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Amendment 3041
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates and content for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. | The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates for the information to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Amendment 3042
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7 a. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to lay down the templates to be reported pursuant to the paragraph 6, first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Amendment 3043
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 7 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7a. In the interests of transparency and in order to protect data confidentiality, a simplified version of the EFD shall be made available to the public. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3044
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: | deleted |
| (a) small-sized enterprises; | |
| (b) research and education institutions. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3045
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: | deleted |
| (a) small-sized enterprises; | |
| (b) research and education institutions. |
Or. en
Amendment 3046
Julie Rechagneux, Aleksandar Nikolic, Mélanie Disdier, Pascale Piera, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Christophe Bay, Marion Maréchal
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: | deleted |
| (a) small-sized enterprises; | |
| (b) research and education institutions. |
Or. en
Amendment 3047
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: | 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100, except if they decide to comply with the latter on a voluntary basis: |
Or. en
Amendment 3048
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: | 8. Within the first 60 months of the entry into force of this Regulation, the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: |
Or. en
Amendment 3049
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: | 8. The following Union space operators shall be permanently exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: |
Or. en
Amendment 3050
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: | 8. Until 31 December 2030 the following space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: |
Or. en
Amendment 3051
Angelika Winzig
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: | 8. The following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: |
Or. en
Justification
An indefinite exemption from environmental sustainability provisions for research and education institutions as well as small and microenterprises is justified, as space ecosystems in smaller Member States are largely driven by these actors. A limited transition period would risk imposing disproportionate burdens on those least able to absorb them.
Amendment 3052
Katri Kulmuni
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Until 31 December 2031 the following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: | 8. The following Union space operators shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100: |
Or. en
Amendment 3053
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – point a
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96– paragraph 8 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) small-sized enterprises; | (a) small- and medium-sized enterprises, small mid caps; |
Or. en
Amendment 3054
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) small-sized enterprises; | (a) small and medium-sized enterprises; |
Or. en
Amendment 3055
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a a) mid-cap enterprises; |
Or. en
Amendment 3056
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b a) In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) space activities or ISOS space missions carried out by Union spacecraft operators that are research and education institutions or small and medium-sized enterprises or mid-cap enterprises, shall be exempted from this obligation laid down in Articles 96, 97, 99 and 100; |
Or. en
Amendment 3057
Julie Rechagneux, Aleksandar Nikolic, Mélanie Disdier, Pascale Piera, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Christophe Bay, Marion Maréchal
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8 a. Simplified requirements shall apply to SMEs, small mid-caps and research organisations, provided that their space activities meet at least one of the following conditions: | |
| (a) the total mass of the space object is below 1 000 kg; | |
| (b) the number of space objects operated is below a threshold defined by the Commission; | |
| (c) the activity does not involve critical infrastructure as defined in Union law. |
Or. en
Amendment 3058
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 8 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8 a. Where Union space operators have previous to the introduction of the regulation not faced similar obligations imposed in paragraph 2, they shall receive explicit support as defined under Article 109 (2d) of this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 3059
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 a (new)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article96a | |
| Light regime for environmental sustainability | |
| 1. In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) space activities carried out by Union spacecraft operators that are research and education institutions or SMEs shall be exempted from the environmental sustainability of space activities referred to in Title IV, Chapter III. | |
| 2. All other space activities carried out by Union spacecraft operators that are research and education institutions or small-and medium sized enterprises shall be exempted from the environmental sustainability of space activities referred to in Title IV, Chapter III until 31 December 2031. |
Or. en
Amendment 3060
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| EF calculation and verification of the space activities | EF calculation |
Or. en
Amendment 3061
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – title
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| EF calculation and verification of the space activities | EF estimation and verification of the space activities |
Or. en
Amendment 3062
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| EF calculation and verification of the space activities | EF estimation of the space activities |
Or. en
Amendment 3063
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The EF of space activities shall cover the space missions carried out in any of the Earth orbits including graveyard orbits. | 1. The EF of space activities shall cover the space missions carried out in any of the Earth orbits including graveyard orbits, and shall reflect the Union’s objective of ensuring a high standard of environmental protection by setting ambitious environmental standards. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3064
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The EF of space activities shall cover the space missions carried out in any of the Earth orbits including graveyard orbits. | 1. The EF of space activities shall cover the space activities carried out on Earth and in any Earth orbits. |
Or. en
Amendment 3065
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 1
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The EF of space activities shall cover the space missions carried out in any of the Earth orbits including graveyard orbits. | 1. The EF of space activities shall cover the space activities carried out on Earth, in any of the Earth orbits |
Or. en
Amendment 3066
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The calculation referred to in Article 96(2) shall cover all the activities carried out throughout the lifecycle of a space mission, including during initial stages, such as design and development, during the manufacturing phase, the operation phases and the end of life stages. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3067
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 2
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The calculation referred to in Article 96(2) shall cover all the activities carried out throughout the lifecycle of a space mission, including during initial stages, such as design and development, during the manufacturing phase, the operation phases and the end of life stages. | 2. With a view to limiting the administrative burden for operators, the estimation referred to in Article 96(2) shall focus on the phases of the lifecycle of a space mission with the most significant environmental impact. The estimation methodology shall not duplicate in any way other existing reporting obligations at Union or Member State-level. |
Or. en
Amendment 3068
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The calculation referred to in Article 96(2) shall cover all the activities carried out throughout the lifecycle of a space mission, including during initial stages, such as design and development, during the manufacturing phase, the operation phases and the end of life stages. | 2. The estimation of the EF shall cover to the extent possible all the activities carried out throughout the lifecycle of a space activity, including during initial stages, such as design and development, during the manufacturing phase, the operation phases and the end-of-life stages. |
Or. en
Amendment 3069
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The EF of space activities carried out under the Union Space Programme and the Union Secure Connectivity Programme shall cover the components referred to in Article 3(1), points (a) to (c) and point (e), of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 and in Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2023/588. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3070
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of calculation and verification of the EF of space activities, by taking into account scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918 . Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. | deleted |
| 18 (18)Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 3071
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of calculation and verification of the EF of space activities, by taking into account scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279. Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. | 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of calculation and verification of the EF of space activities, by taking into account scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918. The method of calculation shall take account of the resource efficiency, impact assessment and circularity of space activities. Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress, and will include, but not be limited to, high-atmosphere emissions of space activities (soot, alumina, water vapour and NOx). The Commission may propose a common tool for all European companies to calculate the EF. |
| 18 Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). |
Or. fr
Amendment 3072
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of calculation and verification of the EF of space activities, by taking into account scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918 . Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. | 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of calculation and verification of the EF of space activities, by taking into account scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918 , with a view to ensuring consistency and complementarity with life-cycle assessment methods currently applied in the space sector. Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. |
| 18 (18)Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). | 18 (18)Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 3073
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of calculation and verification of the EF of space activities, by taking into account scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918 . Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. | 4. By 1 January 2028, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of calculation, verification, and standardized reporting of the EF of space activities, including high-atmosphere emissions of space activities, by taking into account scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918 . Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. |
| 18 (18)Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). | 18 (18)Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 3074
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of calculation and verification of the EF of space activities, by taking into account scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918 . Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. | 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of estimation of the EF of space activities, integrating existing life-cycle assessment methods and relevant international standards currently applied in the space sector and, to the extent possible, aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918 . Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. |
| 18 (18)Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). | 18 (18)Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 3075
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 4
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of calculation and verification of the EF of space activities, by taking into account scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918 . Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. | 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2), to specify the method of estimation of the EF of space activities, by by integrating scientifically sound assessment methods and the relevant international standards and if possible aligned with the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227918. Those implementing acts shall be reviewed to take into account scientific and technological developments and adapt to technological progress. |
| 18 (18)Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). | 18 (18)Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 3076
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. By 1 January 2030, the Commission shall assess the following: | |
| a) the climate impacts of the space sector, including of CO2 and non-CO2 effects; | |
| b) a trajectory to reduce those impacts aligned with the Union’s climate neutrality objective set out in Regulation 2021/1119; | |
| c) the options to reduce the environmental, health, and climate impacts of the propellants used by the space sector. | |
| The Commission shall submit those assessments to the Council and the European Parliament and take follow-up measures, as appropriate. Such measures may include the establishment of EF maximum thresholds for the post-2030 period, notably to contribute to the achievement of Union's climate neutrality by 2050, as well as preparation of new propellant standards and financing programmes. |
Or. en
Amendment 3077
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 98
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 98 | deleted |
| EF certificate | |
| 1. When applying for authorisation, pursuant to Article 7(1), an applicant shall be in possession of a certificate attesting that the EF of their foreseen space activities has been calculated in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 96(2). | |
| 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall be delivered by a qualified technical body for space activities carrying technical assessment, including verification and validation, for the purposes of Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100. |
Or. en
Amendment 3078
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 98
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 98 | deleted |
| EF certificate | |
| 1. When applying for authorisation, pursuant to Article 7(1), an applicant shall be in possession of a certificate attesting that the EF of their foreseen space activities has been calculated in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 96(2). | |
| 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall be delivered by a qualified technical body for space activities carrying technical assessment, including verification and validation, for the purposes of Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100. |
Or. en
Amendment 3079
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 98 – paragraph 1
Proposal for a regulation
Article 98 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. When applying for authorisation, pursuant to Article 7(1), an applicant shall be in possession of a certificate attesting that the EF of their foreseen space activities has been calculated in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 96(2). | 1. When choosing to submit an environmental footprint declaration pursuant to Article 96(4), the applicant may attach a certificate attesting that the EF of their foreseen space activities has been calculated in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 96(2). The absence of a certificate of that kind shall not, in itself, be used to justify the refusal of an authorisation. |
Or. en
Amendment 3080
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 98 – paragraph 2
Proposal for a regulation
Article 98 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall be delivered by a qualified technical body for space activities carrying technical assessment, including verification and validation, for the purposes of Articles 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100. | 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall be delivered by a qualified technical body for space activities carrying technical assessment, including verification and validation. |
Or. en
Amendment 3081
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 99 | deleted |
| Transmission of datasets to the Union EF-related database | |
| 1. | |
| Before applying for authorisation, in accordance with Article 7(1), applicants shall transmit the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), to the Commission. | |
| The Commission shall integrate those datasets in the Union database storing EF-related data and issue a proof of receipt to the applicants thereof. | |
| 2. | |
| Within 2 weeks from the date of the notification to third country space operators and international organisations of the decision of their registration in URSO, the Agency shall transmit to the Commission for integration into the Union database storing EF-related data, the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), which those space services providers have submitted, pursuant to Article 15(1), first subparagraph, or to Article 15(2), in their application for registration in URSO. | |
| The Commission shall issue a proof of receipt. | |
| 3. The Commission shall ensure the confidentiality of the data that is included in the disaggregated datasets. | |
| 4. The aggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made publicly available by the Commission through the Union EF-related database. |
Or. en
Amendment 3082
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99– paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Before applying for authorisation, in accordance with Article 7(1), applicants shall transmit the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), to the Commission. | Before applying for authorisation, in accordance with Article 7(1), applicants that have decided to prepare an EF declaration in accordance with Article 96(4) may transmit the specific aggregated datasets collected for the EF referred to in Article 96(6), to the Commission. |
Or. en
Amendment 3083
François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Before applying for authorisation, in accordance with Article 7(1), applicants shall transmit the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), to the Commission. | Before applying for authorisation, in accordance with Article 7(1), applicants shall transmit the aggregated datasets collected for the EF referred to in Article 96(6), or ensure that their suppliers have transmitted these datasets to the Commission. |
Or. en
Amendment 3084
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Before applying for authorisation, in accordance with Article 7(1), applicants shall transmit the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), to the Commission. | Before applying for authorisation, in accordance with Article 7(1), applicants shall transmit the aggregated datasets collected for the EF referred to in Article 96(6), to the Commission. |
Or. en
Amendment 3085
Julie Rechagneux, Aleksandar Nikolic, Mélanie Disdier, Pascale Piera, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Christophe Bay, Marion Maréchal
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall ensure that the environmental footprint database builds upon and is interoperable with the ESA Life Cycle Assessment database. |
Or. en
Amendment 3086
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 2
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Within 2 weeks from the date of the notification to third country space operators and international organisations of the decision of their registration in URSO, the Agency shall transmit to the Commission for integration into the Union database storing EF-related data, the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), which those space services providers have submitted, pursuant to Article 15(1), first subparagraph, or to Article 15(2), in their application for registration in URSO. | deleted |
| The Commission shall issue a proof of receipt. |
Or. en
Amendment 3087
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Within 2 weeks from the date of the notification to third country space operators and international organisations of the decision of their registration in URSO, the Agency shall transmit to the Commission for integration into the Union database storing EF-related data, the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), which those space services providers have submitted, pursuant to Article 15(1), first subparagraph, or to Article 15(2), in their application for registration in URSO. | deleted |
| The Commission shall issue a proof of receipt. |
Or. en
Amendment 3088
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Within 2 weeks from the date of the notification to third country space operators and international organisations of the decision of their registration in URSO, the Agency shall transmit to the Commission for integration into the Union database storing EF-related data, the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), which those space services providers have submitted, pursuant to Article 15(1), first subparagraph, or to Article 15(2), in their application for registration in URSO. | Within 2 weeks from the date of the notification to space operators from a third country and international organisations of the decision of their registration in URSA, the Agency shall transmit to the Commission for integration into the Union database storing EF-related data, the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), which those space services providers have submitted, pursuant to Article 15(1), first subparagraph, or to Article 15(2), in their application for registration in URSA. |
Or. en
Amendment 3089
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Within 2 weeks from the date of the notification to third country space operators and international organisations of the decision of their registration in URSO, the Agency shall transmit to the Commission for integration into the Union database storing EF-related data, the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), which those space services providers have submitted, pursuant to Article 15(1), first subparagraph, or to Article 15(2), in their application for registration in URSO. | Within 2 weeks from the date of the notification to third country space operators and international organisations of the decision of their registration in URSA, the Agency shall transmit to the Commission for integration into the Union database storing EF-related data, the aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 96(6), point (c), which those space services providers have submitted, pursuant to Article 15(1), first subparagraph, or to Article 15(2), in their application for registration in URSA. |
Or. en
Amendment 3090
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 3
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The Commission shall ensure the confidentiality of the data that is included in the disaggregated datasets. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3091
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The Commission shall ensure the confidentiality of the data that is included in the disaggregated datasets. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3092
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The Commission shall ensure the confidentiality of the data that is included in the disaggregated datasets. | 3. The Commission shall ensure the security and confidentiality of the data that is included in the aggregated and disaggregated datasets. |
Or. en
Amendment 3093
François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 3 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3 a. The Commission shall ensure that data requirements do not oblige suppliers or operators to disclose confidential data, intellecutal property or sensitive design details. This includes the protection of trade secrets and other protected information in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/943. |
Or. en
Amendment 3094
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 3 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3 a. The Commission shall ensure that data requirements do not oblige suppliers or operators to disclose confidential data, intellecutal property or sensitive design details. |
Or. en
Amendment 3095
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The aggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made publicly available by the Commission through the Union EF-related database. | 4. The aggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made publicly available by the Commission through the Union EF-related database. These aggregated datasets may be used by competent authorities, international organisations, research and educational institutions and public and private entities with a view to enhancing and promoting research on the environmental impact of space activities. The datasets shall remain easily accessible to these organisations. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3096
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 4
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The aggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made publicly available by the Commission through the Union EF-related database. | 4. The Commission shall ensure that data requirements do not oblige suppliers or operators to disclose confidential data, intellectual property or sensitive design details. |
Or. en
Amendment 3097
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The aggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made publicly available by the Commission through the Union EF-related database. | 4. The aggregated and disaggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made publicly available by the Commission through the Union EF-related database. |
Or. en
Amendment 3098
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 100 | deleted |
| Use of disaggregated datasets informing policy making | |
| 1. The Commission shall make use of the disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 99, exclusively for the purposes of informing policymaking activities, of providing regulatory updates, and for the creation of derived datasets. | |
| 2. Union space operators, third country space operators and international organisations shall retain full ownership of the data included in the aggregated and disaggregated datasets transmitted pursuant to Article 99. | |
| 3. The Union shall acquire exclusive worldwide ownership of intellectual property rights related to the derived datasets which have been created on the basis of the disaggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1. |
Or. en
Amendment 3099
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – title
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Use of disaggregated datasets informing policy making | Use of aggregated datasets informing policy making |
Or. en
Amendment 3100
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Use of disaggregated datasets informing policy making | Use of aggregated datasets informing policy making |
Or. en
Amendment 3101
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall make use of the disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 99, exclusively for the purposes of informing policymaking activities, of providing regulatory updates, and for the creation of derived datasets. | 1. The Commission shall make use of the disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 99, exclusively for the purposes of informing policymaking activities, of providing regulatory updates, and for the creation of derived datasets. The Commission shall in this regard ensure the protection of confidential information. |
Or. en
Amendment 3102
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall make use of the disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 99, exclusively for the purposes of informing policymaking activities, of providing regulatory updates, and for the creation of derived datasets. | 1. The Commission shall make use of the aggregated datasets referred to in Article 99, exclusively for the purposes of informing policy-making activities, of providing regulatory updates. |
Or. en
Amendment 3103
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 1
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall make use of the disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 99, exclusively for the purposes of informing policymaking activities, of providing regulatory updates, and for the creation of derived datasets. | 1. The Commission shall make use of the aggregated datasets referred to in Article 99, exclusively for the purposes of informing policymaking activities, of providing regulatory updates, and for the creation of derived datasets. |
Or. en
Amendment 3104
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall make use of the disaggregated datasets referred to in Article 99, exclusively for the purposes of informing policymaking activities, of providing regulatory updates, and for the creation of derived datasets. | 1. The Commission shall make use of the datasets referred to in Article 99, exclusively for the purposes of informing policymaking activities, of providing regulatory updates, and for the creation of derived datasets. |
Or. en
Amendment 3105
Katri Kulmuni
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, third country space operators and international organisations shall retain full ownership of the data included in the aggregated and disaggregated datasets transmitted pursuant to Article 99. | 2. Union space operators, third country space operators and international organisations shall retain full ownership of the data included in the aggregated and disaggregated datasets transmitted pursuant to Article 99. Throughout the process, Union space operators shall be entitled to review how their proprietary data are used, and shall have the right to determine whether such data remain under their ownership prior to the constitution of any derived dataset. |
Or. en
Amendment 3106
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, third country space operators and international organisations shall retain full ownership of the data included in the aggregated and disaggregated datasets transmitted pursuant to Article 99. | 2. Union space operators, actors along the value chain, third country space operators and international organisations shall retain full ownership of the data included in the aggregated datasets transmitted pursuant to Article 99 and shall have the right to review the use of their datasets. |
Or. en
Amendment 3107
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, third country space operators and international organisations shall retain full ownership of the data included in the aggregated and disaggregated datasets transmitted pursuant to Article 99. | 2. Space operators and international organisations shall retain full ownership of the data included in the aggregated and disaggregated datasets transmitted pursuant to Article 99. |
Or. en
Amendment 3108
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 2
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Union space operators, third country space operators and international organisations shall retain full ownership of the data included in the aggregated and disaggregated datasets transmitted pursuant to Article 99. | 2. Union space operators, third country space operators and international organisations shall retain full ownership of the data included in the aggregated datasets transmitted pursuant to Article 99. |
Or. en
Amendment 3109
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The Union shall acquire exclusive worldwide ownership of intellectual property rights related to the derived datasets which have been created on the basis of the disaggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3110
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The Union shall acquire exclusive worldwide ownership of intellectual property rights related to the derived datasets which have been created on the basis of the disaggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3111
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 3
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The Union shall acquire exclusive worldwide ownership of intellectual property rights related to the derived datasets which have been created on the basis of the disaggregated datasets referred to in paragraph 1. | 3. The Union shall not acquire any exclusive ownership of intellectual property rights related to the derived datasets. It shall have only a non-exclusive, non-transferable right of use limited to the general interest purposes referred to in paragraph 1. |
Or. en
Amendment 3112
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 100 – paragraph 3 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. While ensuring that the sources of the data remain anonymous, the Agency may make all or part of the disaggregated datasets available to competent authorities, international organisations, research and educational institutions, and non-commercial public and private entities for the purposes of undertaking research and education on the environmental impact of space activities. The Agency may not use the disaggregated datasets to avail itself of commercial services. The Union shall prevent third parties from availing themselves of the disaggregated datasets for any commercial use. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3113
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| ISOS | In-Space Operations and Services |
Or. en
Amendment 3114
Markus Buchheit
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. | 1. Union space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. Those requirements shall be applied in a proportionate and innovation-friendly manner so as not to unduly hinder the development of new ISOS technologies, services and business models. |
Or. en
Amendment 3115
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. | 1. Union space operators providing or receiving In-Space Operations and Services (ISOS) shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII 36 months from the date of application of this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 3116
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 1
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. | 1. Union space operators providing or receiving ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 60 months from the date of application of this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 3117
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. | 1. Union space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII 48 months from the date of application of this Regulation. |
Or. en
Amendment 3118
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. | 1. Space operators active in the Union and carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3119
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. | 1. Space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2032. |
Or. en
Amendment 3120
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Union space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. | 1. Space operators carrying out ISOS shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Article and Annex VIII from 1 January 2034. |
Or. en
Justification
ISOS obligations apply to all 'space operators' carrying out ISOS, not only 'Union space operators'. An active debris removal or life-extension operation conducted by a non-Union operator in EU-adjacent orbits carries the same collision risks as one conducted by a Union operator; equal safety obligations are justified.
Amendment 3121
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. For Union owned assets, spacecraft above the mini-satellite class that are operated by Union space operators shall possess a minimal technical capacity to receiving in-space services. | 2. For Union owned assets, spacecraft with weight at launch of at least 600 kilograms that are operated by Union space operators shall possess a minimal technical capacity to receiving in-space services and be equipped with dedicated Spacecraft Service Interfaces (SSI). This shall be defined with close involvement of the industry as well as experts from research and academia. |
Or. en
Amendment 3122
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. For Union owned assets, spacecraft above the mini-satellite class that are operated by Union space operators shall possess a minimal technical capacity to receiving in-space services. | 2. Union owned assets that are operated by Union space operators shall possess a minimal technical capacity to receiving in-space services. |
Or. en
Amendment 3123
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. For the purposes of ensuring the minimal technical capacity referred to in paragraph 2, a client spacecraft operated by Union space operators shall be equipped with dedicated Spacecraft Service Interfaces (SSI). | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3124
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. For the purposes of ensuring the minimal technical capacity referred to in paragraph 2, a client spacecraft operated by Union space operators shall be equipped with dedicated Spacecraft Service Interfaces (SSI). | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3125
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. For the purposes of ensuring the minimal technical capacity referred to in paragraph 2, a client spacecraft operated by Union space operators shall be equipped with dedicated Spacecraft Service Interfaces (SSI). | 3. For the purposes of ensuring the minimal technical capacity referred to in paragraph 2, a client spacecraft operated by space operators shall be equipped with dedicated Spacecraft Service Interfaces (SSI). |
Or. en
Amendment 3126
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113 to further supplement this Regulation by specifying: | 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113 to further supplement this Regulation taking into account European and international standards or methods existing or under development by specifying: |
Or. en
Amendment 3127
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113 to further supplement this Regulation by specifying: | 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 113 to further supplement this Regulation taking into account European and International standards or methods existing or under development: |
Or. en
Amendment 3128
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4 a. These delegated acts must be adopted with the aim of ensuring adequate consultation of relevant stakeholders, and take into account existing international guidelines, best practices, and standards. |
Or. en
Amendment 3129
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101– paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down: | The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, taking into account European and international standards and without creating additional administrative burden lay down: |
Or. en
Amendment 3130
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down: | The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, taking into account European and International standards or methods existing or under development, lay down: |
Or. en
Amendment 3131
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2). | Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2) with the aim of ensuring adequate consultation of relevant stakeholders, and take into account existing international guidelines, best practices, and standards. |
Or. en
Amendment 3132
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 1
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. A competent authority may request the Union collision avoidance space services provider referred to in Article 64(1) to provide it with up-to-date information about its spacecraft, in the context of the annual reporting or of specific investigations carried out on Union spacecraft operators. | 1. A competent authority may request the collision avoidance space services providers referred to in Article 64(1) to provide it with up-to-date information about its spacecraft, in the context of the annual reporting or of specific investigations carried out on Union spacecraft operators. |
Or. en
Amendment 3133
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. A competent authority may request the Union collision avoidance space services provider referred to in Article 64(1) to provide it with up-to-date information about its spacecraft, in the context of the annual reporting or of specific investigations carried out on Union spacecraft operators. | 1. A competent authority may request the Union collision avoidance space services provider referred to in Article 64(1) to provide it with up-to-date information about its spacecraft, in the context of the annual reporting or of specific investigations carried out on spacecraft operators. |
Or. en
Amendment 3134
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. A competent authority may request the Union collision avoidance space services provider referred to in Article 64(1) to provide it with up-to-date information about its spacecraft, in the context of the annual reporting or of specific investigations carried out on Union spacecraft operators. | 1. A national competent authority may request the Union collision avoidance entity referred to in Article 64(1) to provide it with up-to-date information about its spacecraft, in the context of the annual reporting or of specific investigations carried out on Union spacecraft operators. |
Or. en
Amendment 3135
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Upon receipt of such request, the Union collision avoidance space services provider referred to in Article 64(1) shall report to the competent authority on whether: | 2. Upon receipt of such request, the collision avoidance space services providers referred to in Article 64(1) shall report to the competent authority on whether: |
Or. en
Amendment 3136
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Upon receipt of such request, the Union collision avoidance space services provider referred to in Article 64(1) shall report to the competent authority on whether: | 2. Upon receipt of such request, the Union collision avoidance entity referred to in Article 64(1) shall report to the national competent authority on whether: |
Or. en
Amendment 3137
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the measures set-up by the Union spacecraft operator meet the requirements outlined in the space debris mitigation plans referred to in Article 70(2), first subparagraph, throughout all phases of the space mission; | (a) the measures set-up by the spacecraft operator meet the requirements outlined in the space debris mitigation plans referred to in Article 70(2), first subparagraph, throughout all phases of the space mission; |
Or. en
Amendment 3138
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 2 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the measures set-up by the Union spacecraft operator meet the requirements outlined in the space debris mitigation plans referred to in Article 70(2), first subparagraph, throughout all phases of the space mission; | (a) the measures set-up by the spacecraft operator meet the requirements outlined in the space debris mitigation plans referred to in Article 70(2), first subparagraph, throughout all phases of the space mission; |
Or. en
Amendment 3139
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the Union spacecraft operator complies with the requirements laid down in Article 64(1), (2), (3) and (4), and, as applicable, in Article 101(3). | (c) the spacecraft operator complies with the requirements laid down in Article 64(1), (2), (3) and (4), and, as applicable, in Article 101(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 3140
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 2 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the Union spacecraft operator complies with the requirements laid down in Article 64(1), (2), (3) and (4), and, as applicable, in Article 101(3). | (c) the spacecraft operator complies with the requirements laid down in Article 64(1), (2), (3) and (4), and, as applicable, in Article 101(3). |
Or. en
Amendment 3141
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Conditions for collision avoidance manoeuvres in case of HIE | Conditions for collision avoidance manoeuvres in case of High Interest Event |
Or. en
Amendment 3142
Sergey Lagodinsky
Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where both spacecraft are registered to the CA entity referred to in Article 64(1), Union spacecraft operators shall seek to agree on a strategy to implement the CAM referred to in paragraph 1under the coordination of that CA entity, within a reasonable period. | 2. Spacecraft operators shall seek to agree on a strategy to implement the CAM referred to in paragraph 1under the coordination of that CA entity, within a reasonable period. |
Or. en
Amendment 3143
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where both spacecraft are registered to the CA entity referred to in Article 64(1), Union spacecraft operators shall seek to agree on a strategy to implement the CAM referred to in paragraph 1under the coordination of that CA entity, within a reasonable period. | 2. Spacecraft operators shall seek to agree on a strategy to implement the CAM referred to in paragraph 1under the coordination of that CA entity, within a reasonable period. |
Or. en
Justification
Consequential: 'spacecraft operators' replaces 'Union spacecraft operators' for equal treatment in conjunction avoidance coordination under CA entity coordination.
Amendment 3144
Marina Mesure
Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – paragraph 6 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. In the event that one or more space operators should, upon receiving an alert, fail to comply with the strategy referred to in paragraph 3, or that a spacecraft operator referred to in paragraph 4 should refuse to establish contact or refuse to cooperate with the Union collision avoidance entity, the Agency may impose financial penalties, or sanctions of another kind, on the operators concerned. |
Or. fr
Amendment 3145
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – paragraph 6 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6 a. Union spacecraft operators shall take into account relevant space radiation monitoring data and space weather alerts when responding to High Interest Event alerts, particularly where elevated radiation levels may impair manoeuvrability or tracking accuracy. |
Or. en
Amendment 3146
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards in relation to the following essential requirements: | 1. The Commission shall, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, request that the relevant European standardisation organisations adopt or develop harmonised standards in support of Article 25(5), Articles 58 to 73, and Annexes I, II and V. |
| The Commission shall make that request within six months of the date of entry into force of this Regulation and shall require the European standardisation organisations to complete the work referred to in the first subparagraph within 18 months of the date of that request. | |
| In developing or adopting those harmonised standards, the European standardisation organisations shall build on existing internationally recognised standards and guidelines applicable to launch safety and space debris mitigation, including existing work by European standardisation bodies. | |
| Until the references of harmonised standards developed or adopted pursuant to the first subparagraph are published in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Commission shall, within six months of the date of entry into force of this Regulation, publish a communication identifying: | |
| (a) the references of existing European standards already adopted by European standardisation organisations that are applicable on an interim basis; and | |
| (b) other internationally recognised technical documents applicable on an interim basis for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with Articles 58 to 73. | |
| Compliance with the standards or documents referred to in point (a) of this subparagraph shall confer a presumption of conformity with the corresponding essential requirements for the duration of the interim period. |
Or. en
Justification
Strengthening the standardisation mandate to require the Commission to request that European Standardisation Organisations 'adopt or develop harmonised standards' creates a clearer legal obligation producing standards whose references can be published in the Official Journal, triggering the presumption of conformity that is the operational backbone of the compliance architecture under Article 70a.
Amendment 3147
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards in relation to the following essential requirements: | The Commission shall rely on existing, generally recognised space requirements or shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation bodies to draft standards in relation to essential requirements under this regulation laid down in Article 72(2), first subparagraph, for the purposes of demonstrating compliance with Article 72(1). |
Or. en
Amendment 3148
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards in relation to the following essential requirements: | The Commission shall rely on existing european or international standards or request, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, one or more European standardisation organisations and bodies to draft standards in relation to the following essential requirements: |
Or. en
Amendment 3149
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards in relation to the following essential requirements: | The Commission may rely on existing generally recognised space requirements or, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft standards in relation to the following essential requirements: |
Or. en
Amendment 3150
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the requirements laid down in Article 72(2), first subparagraph, for the purposes of demonstrating compliance with Article 72(1); | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3151
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the requirements laid down in Article 72(2), first subparagraph, for the purposes of demonstrating compliance with Article 72(1); | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
The initial standardisation request list is deleted: specific technical domains are addressed through the broader standardisation mandate rather than fixed in primary legislation. This preserves flexibility as the technical framework evolves.
Amendment 3152
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the requirements laid down in Article 25(5), first subparagraph, for the purposes of demonstrating compliance with Article 25(2). | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 3153
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the requirements laid down in Article 25(5), first subparagraph, for the purposes of demonstrating compliance with Article 25(2). | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Consequential deletion
Amendment 3154
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. | When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account existing European, namely CEN/CENELEC, ETSI and ECSS, or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. |
| The Commission shall establish a permanent Industry Consultation Board, including representatives of the European space industry, space associations, and relevant industrial stakeholders, when developing implementing acts. To consider a full perspective on the practical implications of new standards, small and medium-sized enterprises, mid-cap enterprises and start-ups in particular shall be integrated in this consultation board. |
Or. en
Amendment 3155
Julie Rechagneux, Aleksandar Nikolic, Mélanie Disdier, Pascale Piera, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Christophe Bay, Marion Maréchal
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. | When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account existing European and international standards and generally recognised space requirements, including those developed under ECSS, ESCC and CCSDS, in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. |
Or. en
Amendment 3156
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. | When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, and to avoid imposing additional administrative burden in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. |
Or. en
Amendment 3157
Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. | When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account existing European and international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. |
Or. en
Amendment 3158
Sarah Knafo
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. | When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission should take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. |
Or. en
Amendment 3159
Katri Kulmuni
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. | When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. |
Or. en
Amendment 3160
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| When preparing the standardisation requests referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, to simplify the development of standards, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. | When preparing standardisation requests pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall consult the Agency. When doing so, the Commission may take into account existing European or international standards in place or under development, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. |
Or. en
Justification
Requiring the Commission to consult the Agency before preparing standardisation requests ensures technical coherence between the standardisation work and the Agency's regulatory implementation. The Agency's direct operational experience with the EUSA system is the most relevant input for prioritising and scoping standardisation requests.
Amendment 3161
Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 are fulfilled, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications covering the technical requirements which provide the means to comply with the essential requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph. | 2. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications for the purposes of this Regulation only where all of the following conditions are fulfilled: |
| (a) no reference to European harmonised standards covering the relevant requirements has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union; | |
| (b) the Commission has issued a standardisation request to one or more European standardisation organisations pursuant to Article 104(1) and at least one of the following conditions is met: | |
| (i) the request has been rejected by the standardisation organisation concerned; | |
| (ii) the standards requested have not been delivered within the deadline specified in the request, provided that the deadline is not less than 24 months from the date of the request; | |
| (iii) the standards delivered do not comply with the request; | |
| (iv) the standards delivered are insufficient to cover the relevant requirements. | |
| (c) the Commission has consulted operators, industry representatives including small and medium-sized enterprises, the Agency, and the relevant European standardisation organisations before adopting the common specification. Common specifications adopted pursuant to this paragraph shall cease to apply to the extent that a reference to a harmonised standard covering the same requirements is published in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
Or. en
Justification
Tightening the conditions for Commission common specifications — the fallback when harmonised standards are unavailable — to require that no harmonised standard is available, that no request to ESOs has been made, and that the specification genuinely serves the Regulation's objectives, ensures this instrument is used as the exception it is meant to be rather than as a shortcut to avoid the ESO standardisation process.
Amendment 3162
Julie Rechagneux, Aleksandar Nikolic, Mélanie Disdier, Pascale Piera, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Christophe Bay, Marion Maréchal
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 are fulfilled, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications covering the technical requirements which provide the means to comply with the essential requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph. | 2. Where the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 are fulfilled, and where existing generally recognised space requirements, methods or standards are not available or are insufficient to ensure compliance with the essential requirements, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications covering the technical requirements which provide the means to comply with the essential requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Amendment 3163
András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 2
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 are fulfilled, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications covering the technical requirements which provide the means to comply with the essential requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph. | 2. Where the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 are fulfilled, the Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications provided that those specifications have been previously assessed by the relevant technical bodies and industrial stakeholders. Common specifications shall be used only as a last resort, be technology-neutral and proportionate. |
Or. en
Amendment 3164
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 are fulfilled, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications covering the technical requirements which provide the means to comply with the essential requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph. | 2. Where the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 are fulfilled, the Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications covering the technical requirements which provide the means to comply with the essential requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Amendment 3165
Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 2 shall be adopted in any of the following cases where the Commission has requested, pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, one or more European standardisation organisations to draft a standard for the essential requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, and one of the following situations occurs: | The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 2 shall be adopted in any of the following cases where the Commission either considers generally recognised space requirements or requested, pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, one or more European standardisation organisations to draft a standard for the essential requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, and one of the following situations occurs: |
Or. en