Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

amendment list, 14 April 2026

Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union

Document ITRE-AM-786879 · (COM(2025)0335 – 2025/0335(COD))

Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

Full text

Jump to an amendment (415)
Text 2,746 paragraphs

Amendment 1291

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point e c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e c) cybersecurity services.

Or. en

Amendment 1292

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 15

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 15

Read the rest (2,734 paragraphs)
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) ‘space services provider’ means a provider of space services covered by this Regulation;(15) ‘space services provider’ means a space operator or a primary provider of space-based data, providing the services defined in point (14);

Or. en

Amendment 1293

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) ‘space services provider’ means a provider of space services covered by this Regulation;(15) ‘space services provider’ means a provider of space services as defined in point 14 of this Article or space-based data as defined in point 12 of this Article;

Or. en

Amendment 1294

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) ‘space services provider’ means a provider of space services covered by this Regulation;(15) ‘space services provider’ means a space operator or a primary provider of space-based data, providing the services defined in point (14);

Or. en

Justification

Adding 'space-based data' to the definition of space services provider ensures that primary providers of space-based data — a distinct category established separately — are explicitly covered by the Regulation's obligations. The Commission text created a gap between data provision and service provision that this amendment closes.

Amendment 1295

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15) ‘space services provider’ means a provider of space services covered by this Regulation;(15) ‘space services provider’ means a space operator providing the services in point 14 of this Regulation;

Or. en

Amendment 1296

Giorgio Gori, Jens Geier, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(15 a) 'SSA service provider’ means any entity which is recognised by the Agency and established in a Member State and offers data or services aimed at enhancing space safety in connection with the detection, tracking and classification of space objects, collision avoidance, orbital data analysis, fragmentation and re-entry of space objects into the atmosphere, space weather events and near-Earth objects;

Or. en

Amendment 1297

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) ‘space operator’ means a public or private entity that operates the space infrastructure, by carrying out at least one of the following space services, based on authorisation or a specific regime for carrying out a national space programme:(16) ‘space operator’ means a public or private entity that performs or undertakes to perform space activities;

Or. en

Amendment 1298

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – introductory part

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) ‘space operator’ means a public or private entity that operates the space infrastructure, by carrying out at least one of the following space services, based on authorisation or a specific regime for carrying out a national space programme:(16) ‘space operator’ means a public or private entity that performs or undertakes to perform space activities, including the following:

Or. en

Amendment 1299

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) ‘space operator’ means a public or private entity that operates the space infrastructure, by carrying out at least one of the following space services, based on authorisation or a specific regime for carrying out a national space programme:(16) ‘space operator’ means a public or private entity that performs or undertakes to perform space activities, including the following:

Or. en

Amendment 1300

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(16) ‘space operator’ means a public or private entity that operates the space infrastructure, by carrying out at least one of the following space services, based on authorisation or a specific regime for carrying out a national space programme:(16) ‘space operator’ means a public or private entity that operates the space infrastructure in the Union, by carrying out at least one of the space services as defined in point 14 of this Article;

Or. en

Amendment 1301

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) operation, control and return of a space object (‘spacecraft operator’);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1302

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) operation, control and return of a space object (‘spacecraft operator’);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1303

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) operation, control and return of a space object (‘spacecraft operator’);(a) operation, control and re-entry of a space object (‘spacecraft operator’);

Or. en

Amendment 1304

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) operation, control and monitoring of the launch process of a space object (‘launch operator’);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1305

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) operation, control and monitoring of the launch process of a space object (‘launch operator’);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1306

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) operation, control and maintenance of facilities at the ground segment of space infrastructure used for the launch process (‘launch site operator’);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1307

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) operation, control and maintenance of facilities at the ground segment of space infrastructure used for the launch process (‘launch site operator’);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1308

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) operation and control of a space object for the purposes of provision of in-space operation and service, including to other space objects (‘ISOS provider’);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1309

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) operation and control of a space object for the purposes of provision of in-space operation and service, including to other space objects (‘ISOS provider’);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1310

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 17

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(17) ‘Union space operator’ means a space operator established in the Union, or controlled by a natural person or a legal person that is a space services provider established in the Union;deleted

Or. en

Justification

The 'Union space operator' sub-category is operationally redundant in the context of the centralised EUSA authorisation system. The regulatory work done by this definition — distinguishing EU-established from non-EU operators — is handled through the authorisation and registration articles, not through a definitional sub-category.

Amendment 1311

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 17

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(17) ‘Union space operator’ means a space operator established in the Union, or controlled by a natural person or a legal person that is a space services provider established in the Union;(17) ‘Union space operator’ means a space operator established in the Union, or controlled by a natural person or a legal person that is a space services provider established in the Union, and provides space services within the Union;

Or. en

Amendment 1312

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 17

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 17

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(17) ‘Union space operator’ means a space operator established in the Union, or controlled by a natural person or a legal person that is a space services provider established in the Union;(17) ‘Union space operator’ means a space operator established in the Union, or controlled by a natural person or a legal person that is established in the Union or that carries out a launch from the Union territory;

Or. en

Amendment 1313

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 17

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(17) ‘Union space operator’ means a space operator established in the Union, or controlled by a natural person or a legal person that is a space services provider established in the Union;(17) ‘Union space operator’ means a space operator established in the Union, or controlled by a natural person or a legal person established in the Union or that carries out a launch from Union territory;

Or. en

Amendment 1314

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 18

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) ‘control’ means, for the purposes of point (17), the ability to exercise a decisive influence over a legal entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediate legal entities;(18) ‘control’ means, for the purposes of points (17) and (19), the ability to exercise a decisive influence over a legal entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediate legal entities;

Or. en

Amendment 1315

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 18

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(18) ‘control’ means, for the purposes of point (17), the ability to exercise a decisive influence over a legal entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediate legal entities;(18) ‘control’ means, for the purposes of point (17) and (19), the ability to exercise a decisive influence over a legal entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediate legal entities;

Or. en

Amendment 1316

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 19

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19) ‘third country space operator’ means a space operator established in a third country which carries out any of the following:deleted
(a) provides space services to Union space operators, or in relation to the space assets defined in points (20) and (21),
(b) acts itself as a primary provider of space-based data, or
(c) provides services to primary providers of space-based data;

Or. en

Justification

The full definition is replaced by the simplified market access rule: third-country operators providing services in the Union register in URSA. The detailed definitional sub-categories are no longer needed in light of the streamlined registration architecture.

Amendment 1317

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – introductory part

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 19

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19) ‘third country space operator’ means a space operator established in a third country which carries out any of the following:(19) ‘third country space operator’ means a space operator established in a third country, except where it is a Union space operator pursuant to paragraph (1f) or whether it carries out a launch from Union territory and which carries out any of the following:

Or. en

Amendment 1318

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19) ‘third country space operator’ means a space operator established in a third country which carries out any of the following:(19) ‘third country space operator’ means a space operator established in a third country, except where it is a Union space operator pursuant to paragraph 17 or whether it carries out a launch from Union territory and which carries out any of the following:

Or. en

Amendment 1319

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(19) ‘third country space operator’ means a space operator established in a third country which carries out any of the following:(19) ‘third country space operator’ means a space operator established in a third country which carries out in the Union any of the following:

Or. en

Amendment 1320

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) provides space services to Union space operators, or in relation to the space assets defined in points (20) and (21),(a) provides space services,

Or. en

Amendment 1321

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) provides space services to Union space operators, or in relation to the space assets defined in points (20) and (21),(a) provides space services to Union space operators, or in relation to Union owned assets or governmental or non-governmental space assets;

Or. en

Amendment 1322

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point a

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) provides space services to Union space operators, or in relation to the space assets defined in points (20) and (21),(a) provides space services to Union space operators, or in relation to Union-owned assets or governmental or non-governmental space assets

Or. en

Amendment 1323

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 20

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 20

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(20) ‘Union-owned assets’ mean Union-owned tangible and intangible assets created or developed under the Union Space Programme referred to in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 and Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2023/588;(20) ‘Union-owned assets’ mean Union-owned tangible and intangible assets created or developed under the Union Space Programme referred to in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 and under the Union Secure Connectivity Programme referred to in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2023/588;

Or. en

Amendment 1324

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) ‘governmental or non-governmental space assets’ means assets other than those defined in point (20), whether publicly or privately owned, operated by a public authority or a private party established in a Member State, including dual use assets placed under civilian control;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1325

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) ‘governmental or non-governmental space assets’ means assets other than those defined in point (20), whether publicly or privately owned, operated by a public authority or a private party established in a Member State, including dual use assets placed under civilian control;(21) ‘governmental or non-governmental space assets’ means assets other than those defined in point (20), whether publicly or privately owned, operated by a public authority or a private party established in a Member State;

Or. en

Amendment 1326

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) ‘governmental or non-governmental space assets’ means assets other than those defined in point (20), whether publicly or privately owned, operated by a public authority or a private party established in a Member State, including dual use assets placed under civilian control;(21) ‘governmental or non-governmental space assets’ means assets other than those defined in point (20), whether publicly or privately owned, operated by a public authority or a private party established in a Member State;

Or. en

Amendment 1327

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 21

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 21

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(21) ‘governmental or non-governmental space assets’ means assets other than those defined in point (20), whether publicly or privately owned, operated by a public authority or a private party established in a Member State, including dual use assets placed under civilian control;(21) ‘governmental or non-governmental space assets’ means assets other than Union-owned assets, whether publicly or privately owned, operated by a public authority or a private party established in a Member State, including dual use assets placed under civilian control

Or. en

Amendment 1328

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 22

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(22) ‘primary providers of space-based data’ means space services providers, established in the Union or in a third country, that initiate the first processing of space-based data which is technically sufficient to enable any subsequent provision of space-based data, as follows:deleted
(a) providers of electronic communications services, where the space-based data concerned is communication;
(b) space services providers which ensure the first processing of observation data, before other processing thereof, where the space-based data concerned is observation data;

Or. en

Amendment 1329

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(22) ‘primary providers of space-based data’ means space services providers, established in the Union or in a third country, that initiate the first processing of space-based data which is technically sufficient to enable any subsequent provision of space-based data, as follows:(22) ‘primary providers of space-based data’ means space services providers, that provide for the first time space-based data in the Union as follows:

Or. en

Justification

Replacing 'initiate the first processing' with 'provide for the first time space-based data in the Union' as the threshold for 'primary provider' status better captures the market access trigger: the relevant moment is first provision in the Union market, not the technical processing step, which varies by technology architecture.

Amendment 1330

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(22) ‘primary providers of space-based data’ means space services providers, established in the Union or in a third country, that initiate the first processing of space-based data which is technically sufficient to enable any subsequent provision of space-based data, as follows:(22) ‘primary providers of space-based data’ means natural or legal persons that provide space-based data for the first time in the Union market, with a view to its distribution or use within the Union market, in return for payment or free of charge as follows:

Or. en

Amendment 1331

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) providers of electronic communications services, where the space-based data concerned is communication;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1332

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) space services providers which ensure the first processing of observation data, before other processing thereof, where the space-based data concerned is observation data;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1333

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 23

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(23) ‘international organisation’ means an international organisation providing in the Union space services or space-based data generated by space objects placed on an orbit not further than GEO and operated by such international organisations;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1334

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 23

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(23) ‘international organisation’ means an international organisation providing in the Union space services or space-based data generated by space objects placed on an orbit not further than GEO and operated by such international organisations;deleted

Or. en

Justification

The narrow definition — limited to international organisations providing space services in orbit up to GEO — is superseded by the dedicated provisions for international organisations in Title II and Article 107. Retaining a standalone definition narrower than the scope of those provisions creates interpretive ambiguity.

Amendment 1335

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 23

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(23) ‘international organisation’ means an international organisation providing in the Union space services or space-based data generated by space objects placed on an orbit not further than GEO and operated by such international organisations;(23) ‘international organisation’ means an international organisation founded on a treaty or other instrument under international law which provides in the Union space services or space-based data generated by space objects placed on an orbit not further than GEO and operated by such international organisations;

Or. en

Amendment 1336

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 24

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(24) ‘collision avoidance space services provider’ means a provider of collision avoidance services, including the Collision Avoidance entity (CA entity) in the Union, or collision avoidance providers established in a third country;(24) ‘collision avoidance services provider’ means a provider of collision avoidance services, including the Collision Avoidance entity (CA entity) in the Union, or collision avoidance providers established in a third country;

Or. en

Amendment 1337

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 24

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(24) ‘collision avoidance space services provider’ means a provider of collision avoidance services, including the Collision Avoidance entity (CA entity) in the Union, or collision avoidance providers established in a third country;(24) ‘collision avoidance provider’ (CA provider) means a provider of collision avoidance services established in the Union or in a third country, including the Union Collision Avoidance entity ('Union CA entity');

Or. en

Amendment 1338

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 24 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(24 a) 'spacecraft maneuverability' means the ability to perform collision-avoidance maneuvers, keep assigned orbital positions, and execute proximity operations when applicable;

Or. en

Amendment 1339

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(25) ‘research and education institution’ means a space services provider which carries out space activities for experimental purposes, whether or not exploiting the results of that research for commercial purposes;(25) ‘research and education institution’ means a space services provider which carries out space activities solely for research, innovation or educational purposes, whether or not exploiting the results of that research for commercial purposes;

Or. en

Justification

Adding 'solely' to the research and education institution exemption closes a loophole: under the Commission text, a commercial operator could use a research subsidiary that also exploits commercial results to claim the exemption. The revised formulation limits the exemption to activities conducted purely for research, innovation or educational purposes.

Amendment 1340

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(25) ‘research and education institution’ means a space services provider which carries out space activities for experimental purposes, whether or not exploiting the results of that research for commercial purposes;(25) ‘research and education institution’ means an organisation having as its primary goal to conduct research and education activities or experimental development, whether or not exploiting the results of that research for commercial purposes;

Or. en

Amendment 1341

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(25) ‘research and education institution’ means a space services provider which carries out space activities for experimental purposes, whether or not exploiting the results of that research for commercial purposes;(25) ‘research and education institution’ means a space services provider which carries out space activities for experimental purposes or fundamental research, whether or not exploiting the results of that research for commercial purposes;

Or. en

Amendment 1342

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 25

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(25) ‘research and education institution’ means a space services provider which carries out space activities for experimental purposes, whether or not exploiting the results of that research for commercial purposes;(25) ‘research and education institution’ means a space services provider which carries out space activities for research and innovation activities or educational purposes as one of its main objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 1343

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 27

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(27) ‘small mid-caps’ (SMCs) means enterprises as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation C(2025) 3500 final;(27) ‘small mid-cap enterprises’ (SMCs) means enterprises as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation C(2025) 3500 final;

Or. en

Amendment 1344

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 28

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(28) ‘entities applying a simplified risk management’ means space operators that are small enterprises or research or education institutions and apply the simplified risk management referred in Article 10(3) and in Article 15(2);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1345

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 28

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(28) ‘entities applying a simplified risk management’ means space operators that are small enterprises or research or education institutions and apply the simplified risk management referred in Article 10(3) and in Article 15(2);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1346

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 28

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(28) ‘entities applying a simplified risk management’ means space operators that are small enterprises or research or education institutions and apply the simplified risk management referred in Article 10(3) and in Article 15(2);deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1347

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 28

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(28) ‘entities applying a simplified risk management’ means space operators that are small enterprises or research or education institutions and apply the simplified risk management referred in Article 10(3) and in Article 15(2);deleted

Or. en

Justification

Moved to Article 10

Amendment 1348

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 28

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(28) ‘entities applying a simplified risk management’ means space operators that are small enterprises or research or education institutions and apply the simplified risk management referred in Article 10(3) and in Article 15(2);(28) ‘entities applying an assisted risk management’ means space operators that are small enterprises or research or education institutions and apply the assisted risk management referred in Article 10(3) and in Article 15(2);

Or. fr

Amendment 1349

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 28

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 28

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(28) ‘entities applying a simplified risk management’ means space operators that are small enterprises or research or education institutions and apply the simplified risk management referred in Article 10(3) and in Article 15(2);(28) ‘entities applying a simplified risk management’ means space operators that are small and medium-sized enterprises or small mid-caps or research or education institutions which apply simplified risk management;

Or. en

Amendment 1350

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 31

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(31) ‘launch service’ means a service intended to place a space object in orbit, including launch attempts;(31) ‘launch service’ means a service intended to place a space object in orbit, including that launch, re-entry, recovery and re-use attempts may be part of this service;

Or. en

Amendment 1351

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 31

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(31) ‘launch service’ means a service intended to place a space object in orbit, including launch attempts;(31) ‘launch service’ means a service intended to place a space object in orbit, including launch, re-entry, recovery and re-use attempts;

Or. en

Justification

Adding 're-entry, recovery and re-use attempts' to the definition of launch service ensures that the full operational cycle of reusable launch vehicles — including recovery operations — falls within the scope of launch safety requirements. Without this addition, the recovery phase would fall outside the regulated activity.

Amendment 1352

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 31

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(31) ‘launch service’ means a service intended to place a space object in orbit, including launch attempts;(31) ‘launch service’ means a service intended to place a space object in orbit, including launch, re-entry, recovery, and re-use;

Or. en

Amendment 1353

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 32 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(32 a) 'launch phase' means the period of time which, in the context of a space operation, begins when launch operations become irreversible and which ends, unless otherwise specified in the authorisation granted pursuant to this Regulation, at the separation of the launcher and the object intended to be placed in outer space. The launch phase includes, where applicable, the recovery of reusable elements of the launch vehicle.

Or. en

Justification

Defining the launch phase as the period from when launch operations become irreversible to the point specified in the authorisation provides clear legal certainty for the scope of the real-time safety authority (Article 58a) and the insurance obligation (Article 61a). Without a defined launch phase, the temporal scope of these obligations would be contested.

Amendment 1354

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 33

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(33) ‘high-interest events (HIEs)’ means close approaches with a high level of risk, potentially requiring collision avoidance manoeuvres to be performed by a space operator;(33) ‘high-interest events’ means close approaches with a high level of risk, potentially requiring collision avoidance manoeuvres to be performed by a space operator;

Or. en

Amendment 1355

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 35

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(35) ‘conjunction data messages’ means information about a conjunction between two space objects;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1356

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 36

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(36) ‘collision avoidance’ means the execution of collision avoidance manoeuvres to reduce the risk of collision in outer space;(36) ‘collision avoidance’ means the process of identifying potential collisions between a spacecraft and another object and, if necessary, the execution of manoeuvres to reduce the risj of collision in outer space;

Or. en

Amendment 1357

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 36

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(36) ‘collision avoidance’ means the execution of collision avoidance manoeuvres to reduce the risk of collision in outer space;(36) ‘collision avoidance’ means the process of identification and execution of collision avoidance manoeuvres to reduce the risk of collision in outer space;

Or. en

Justification

Adding 'identification' to the collision avoidance definition explicitly includes conjunction assessment and alert processing as part of the regulated activity, not only the execution of avoidance manoeuvres. This is operationally accurate and ensures that the CA subscription obligation covers the full service chain from detection to manoeuvre.

Amendment 1358

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 37

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(37) ‘delta V’ means the velocity increment necessary to reach a specific orbit or flight path;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1359

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 38

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(38) ‘object of interest’ means any object involved in any situation that could affect the other space objects or the situation on Earth;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1360

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 39

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(39) ‘re-entry’ means the permanent return of a space object into the Earth’s atmosphere;(39) ‘re-entry’ means the return of a space object into the Earth’s atmosphere from outer space;

Or. en

Amendment 1361

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 39

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(39) ‘re-entry’ means the permanent return of a space object into the Earth’s atmosphere;(39) ‘re-entry’ means the return of a space object into the Earth’s atmosphere;

Or. en

Amendment 1362

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 39

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(39) ‘re-entry’ means the permanent return of a space object into the Earth’s atmosphere;(39) ‘re-entry’ means the return of a space object into the Earth’s atmosphere;

Or. en

Justification

Replacing 'permanent return' with 'return' ensures the definition covers all re-entry events — including temporary re-entries for recovery and suborbital trajectories — and not only permanent disposal re-entries.

Amendment 1363

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 40

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(40) ‘disposal’ means a set of actions performed by a spacecraft or a launch vehicle orbital stage, with or without support of a servicer spacecraft, with a view to permanently reduce the risk of accidental fragmentation and to achieve long-term clearance of orbits;(40) ‘disposal’ means a set of actions performed by a spacecraft or a launch vehicle orbital stage, with or without support of a servicer spacecraft, with a view to permanently reduce the risk of accidental fragmentation and to achieve long-term clearance of highly frequented orbits;

Or. en

Amendment 1364

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 42

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(42) ‘end of life’ means the instant when a spacecraft or a launch vehicles orbital stage is permanently turned off, nominally as it completes its disposal phase, re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere, or can no longer be controlled by a space operator;(42) ‘end of life’ means the instant when a spacecraft or a launch vehicle's orbital stage completes the tasks for which it has been designed, completes its disposal phase, re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere, or can no longer be controlled by a space operator;

Or. en

Amendment 1365

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 42

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(42) ‘end of life’ means the instant when a spacecraft or a launch vehicles orbital stage is permanently turned off, nominally as it completes its disposal phase, re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere, or can no longer be controlled by a space operator;(42) ‘end of life’ means the instant when a spacecraft or a launch vehicles orbital stage has completed the tasks for which it has been designed, its disposal phase, re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere, or can no longer be controlled by a space operator;

Or. en

Justification

Clarifying that end of life is the instant when a spacecraft has completed its designed tasks (not when it is switched off) provides a cleaner operational trigger for end-of-life obligations. The spacecraft's power state is an unreliable trigger; mission completion is the operationally meaningful threshold.

Amendment 1366

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 42

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(42) ‘end of life’ means the instant when a spacecraft or a launch vehicles orbital stage is permanently turned off, nominally as it completes its disposal phase, re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere, or can no longer be controlled by a space operator;(42) ‘end of life’ means the instant when a spacecraft or a launch vehicle orbital stage is permanently turned off, as it completes its disposal phase, re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere, or can no longer be controlled by a space operator;

Or. en

Amendment 1367

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 43

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(43) ‘end of mission’ means the phase when a spacecraft or launch vehicle orbital stage completes the tasks for which it has been designed, other than its disposal, becomes non-functional as a consequence of a failure, or is permanently halted through a voluntary decision;deleted

Or. en

Justification

The end of mission definition is operationally redundant once end of life is clarified. Retaining the two definitions alongside each other would create interpretive conflicts between concepts describing the same transition point in a spacecraft's lifecycle.

Amendment 1368

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 43

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(43) ‘end of mission’ means the phase when a spacecraft or launch vehicle orbital stage completes the tasks for which it has been designed, other than its disposal, becomes non-functional as a consequence of a failure, or is permanently halted through a voluntary decision;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1369

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 45

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(45) ‘space debris’ means any space object, including spacecraft or fragments and elements thereof, in Earth’s orbit and lunar’s orbit, or re-entering Earth’s atmosphere or lunar’s exosphere, that are non-functional or no longer serve any specific purpose, including parts of rockets or artificial satellites, or inactive artificial satellites;(45) ‘space debris’ means any non-functional space object, including spacecraft or fragments and elements thereof, in Earth’s orbit and lunar’s orbit, or re-entering Earth’s atmosphere or lunar’s exosphere;

Or. en

Amendment 1370

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 45

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(45) ‘space debris’ means any space object, including spacecraft or fragments and elements thereof, in Earth’s orbit and lunar’s orbit, or re-entering Earth’s atmosphere or lunar’s exosphere, that are non-functional or no longer serve any specific purpose, including parts of rockets or artificial satellites, or inactive artificial satellites;(45) ‘space debris’ means any space object, including spacecraft or fragments and elements thereof, in Earth’s orbit or re-entering Earth’s atmosphere, that are non-functional or no longer serve any specific purpose;

Or. en

Amendment 1371

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 45

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(45) ‘space debris’ means any space object, including spacecraft or fragments and elements thereof, in Earth’s orbit and lunar’s orbit, or re-entering Earth’s atmosphere or lunar’s exosphere, that are non-functional or no longer serve any specific purpose, including parts of rockets or artificial satellites, or inactive artificial satellites;(45) ‘space debris’ means any space object, including spacecraft or fragments and elements thereof, in Earth’s orbit and lunar’s orbit, or re-entering Earth’s atmosphere or lunar’s exosphere, that are non-functional or no longer serve any specific purpose;

Or. en

Justification

Extending the space debris definition to include lunar orbit is consistent with the Regulation's scope extension to non-Earth orbital environments. As lunar operations increase, a debris definition limited to Earth orbit creates a regulatory gap for objects in lunar orbit that pose collision risks to future crewed and uncrewed lunar missions.

Amendment 1372

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 45

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 45

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(45) ‘space debris’ means any space object, including spacecraft or fragments and elements thereof, in Earth’s orbit and lunar’s orbit, or re-entering Earth’s atmosphere or lunar’s exosphere, that are non-functional or no longer serve any specific purpose, including parts of rockets or artificial satellites, or inactive artificial satellites;(45) ‘space debris’ means any space object, including spacecraft or fragments and elements thereof, in Earth’s orbit, or re-entering Earth’s atmosphere, that are non-functional or no longer serve any specific purpose, including parts of rockets or artificial satellites, or inactive artificial satellites;

Or. en

Amendment 1373

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 48

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(48) ‘critical infrastructure’ means critical infrastructure as defined in Article 2, point (4), of Directive (EU) 2022/2557;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1374

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 49

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(49) ‘mission control centre’ means the element in the ground segment dedicated to the control and monitoring of the execution of a space mission;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Mission control centre is an operational and technical concept that does not carry independent legal weight in the Regulation's obligation structure.

Amendment 1375

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 49

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(49) ‘mission control centre’ means the element in the ground segment dedicated to the control and monitoring of the execution of a space mission;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1376

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 50

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(50) ‘satellite control centre’ means the element of the ground segment dedicated to the control of the satellite platform configuration;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Same rationale as the preceding amendment. Operational sub-definitions without independent legal significance are deleted to reduce definitional complexity.

Amendment 1377

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 50

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(50) ‘satellite control centre’ means the element of the ground segment dedicated to the control of the satellite platform configuration;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1378

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 50

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(50) ‘satellite control centre’ means the element of the ground segment dedicated to the control of the satellite platform configuration;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1379

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 51

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 51

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(51) ‘effective technical control’ means the assurance of a space operator that a space object only executes commands transmitted by authorized sources and that those commands are executed in the proper order and at the intended moment;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1380

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 51

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(51) ‘effective technical control’ means the assurance of a space operator that a space object only executes commands transmitted by authorized sources and that those commands are executed in the proper order and at the intended moment;deleted

Or. en

Justification

The narrower 'effective technical control' definition is superseded by the broader 'effective control' definition introduced in the following amendment, which captures the full legal, technical and operational dimension of control required for the security filter and authorisation obligations.

Amendment 1381

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 51

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(51) ‘effective technical control’ means the assurance of a space operator that a space object only executes commands transmitted by authorized sources and that those commands are executed in the proper order and at the intended moment;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1382

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 51

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(51) ‘effective technical control’ means the assurance of a space operator that a space object only executes commands transmitted by authorized sources and that those commands are executed in the proper order and at the intended moment;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1383

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 51 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(51 a) 'effective control' means the legal, technical and operational ability to ensure the continuous direction, security, maintenance and recovery of the functions essential to the conduct of a space activity, including by preventing any unilateral suspension, denial, override or material alteration of those functions by a third-country entity.

Or. en

Justification

The new 'effective control' definition is the operative concept for the security filter (Article 7a) and Recital 20a: the legal, technical and operational ability to ensure the continuous direction, security, maintenance and recovery of space functions. This broader definition than the pure 'effective technical control' of the Commission text correctly reflects the multi-dimensional nature of the control verification required at authorisation.

Amendment 1384

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 52

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 52

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(52) ‘telemetry/telecommand’ means the links that transmit the telemetry from the space segment to the ground segment and the links that send the telecommand from the ground segment to the space segment;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1385

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 52

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(52) ‘telemetry/telecommand’ means the links that transmit the telemetry from the space segment to the ground segment and the links that send the telecommand from the ground segment to the space segment;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Telemetry/telecommand is a technical operational concept without independent legal significance in the obligation structure.

Amendment 1386

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 52

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(52) ‘telemetry/telecommand’ means the links that transmit the telemetry from the space segment to the ground segment and the links that send the telecommand from the ground segment to the space segment;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1387

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 52

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(52) ‘telemetry/telecommand’ means the links that transmit the telemetry from the space segment to the ground segment and the links that send the telecommand from the ground segment to the space segment;(52) ‘telemetry’ means information sent from the space segment to the ground segment and relayed to the mission control centre;

Or. en

Amendment 1388

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 53

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(53) ‘resilience’ means the ability to prevent, protect against, respond and resist, mitigate, absorb, accommodate, and recover from an incident;(53) ‘resilience’ means the ability to prevent, mitigate, and recover from an incident;

Or. en

Amendment 1389

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 55

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(55) ‘significant cyber threat’ means ‘significant cyber threat’ as defined in Article 6, point (11), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1390

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 55

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(55) ‘significant cyber threat’ means ‘significant cyber threat’ as defined in Article 6, point (11), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1391

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 55

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(55) ‘significant cyber threat’ means ‘significant cyber threat’ as defined in Article 6, point (11), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1392

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 56

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(56) ‘incident’ means an event compromising any of the following:deleted
(a) the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of the stored, transmitted or processed data, or of the services offered by, or accessible via, network and information systems, or
(b) the physical security of the assets of space infrastructure and of space operators;

Or. en

Amendment 1393

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 56 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(56) ‘incident’ means an event compromising any of the following:(56) ‘incident’ means an incident as defined in Article 6, point 6 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555.

Or. en

Amendment 1394

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 56 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of the stored, transmitted or processed data, or of the services offered by, or accessible via, network and information systems, ordeleted

Or. en

Amendment 1395

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 56 – point a

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 56

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of the stored, transmitted or processed data, or of the services offered by, or accessible via, network and information systems, or(a) an incident as defined in Article 6, point (6), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, or

Or. en

Amendment 1396

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 56 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the physical security of the assets of space infrastructure and of space operators;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1397

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 56 – point b

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 56 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the physical security of the assets of space infrastructure and of space operators;(b) an event compromising the physical security of the assets of space infrastructure and of space operators;

Or. en

Amendment 1398

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 57

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(57) ‘incident handling’ means ‘incident handling’ as defined in Article 6, point (8), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1399

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 57

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(57) ‘incident handling’ means ‘incident handling’ as defined in Article 6, point (8), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1400

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 57

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(57) ‘incident handling’ means ‘incident handling’ as defined in Article 6, point (8), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1401

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 58

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(58) ‘additional impact categories’ means categories of environmental information that fall outside the environmental footprint (EF) impact categories calculated and communicated alongside product environmental footprint (PEF) results;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1402

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 58

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(58) ‘additional impact categories’ means categories of environmental information that fall outside the environmental footprint (EF) impact categories calculated and communicated alongside product environmental footprint (PEF) results;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1403

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 58

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(58) ‘additional impact categories’ means categories of environmental information that fall outside the environmental footprint (EF) impact categories calculated and communicated alongside product environmental footprint (PEF) results;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1404

Katri Kulmuni

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 60

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(60) ‘environmental sustainability’ means the ability to preserve and protect the natural Earth environment over time, through appropriate practices and policies meeting present needs and without compromising the availability of resources in the future;(60) ‘environmental sustainability’ means the ability to preserve and protect the natural Earth, environment, atmosphere and space over time, through appropriate practices and policies meeting present needs and without compromising the availability of resources in the future;

Or. en

Amendment 1405

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 60

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(60) ‘environmental sustainability’ means the ability to preserve and protect the natural Earth environment over time, through appropriate practices and policies meeting present needs and without compromising the availability of resources in the future;(60) ‘environmental sustainability’ means the ability to preserve and protect the natural Earth and space environment over time, through appropriate practices and policies meeting present needs and without compromising the availability of resources in the future;

Or. en

Amendment 1406

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 60

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(60) ‘environmental sustainability’ means the ability to preserve and protect the natural Earth environment over time, through appropriate practices and policies meeting present needs and without compromising the availability of resources in the future;(60) ‘environmental sustainability’ means the ability to preserve and protect the natural Earth and space environment over time, through appropriate practices and policies meeting present needs and without compromising the availability of resources in the future;

Or. en

Amendment 1407

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 60

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 60

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(60) ‘environmental sustainability’ means the ability to preserve and protect the natural Earth environment over time, through appropriate practices and policies meeting present needs and without compromising the availability of resources in the future;(60) ‘environmental sustainability’ means the ability to preserve and protect the natural Earth environment over time, through appropriate practices and policies in line with the principles of technological neutrality and economic competitiveness;

Or. en

Amendment 1408

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 61

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(61) ‘disaggregation’ means the process that breaks down an aggregated dataset into smaller horizontal or vertical unit process datasets;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1409

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 61

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 61

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(61) ‘disaggregation’ means the process that breaks down an aggregated dataset into smaller horizontal or vertical unit process datasets;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1410

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 61

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(61) ‘disaggregation’ means the process that breaks down an aggregated dataset into smaller horizontal or vertical unit process datasets;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1411

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 62

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(62) ‘derived dataset’ means a dataset obtained by combining, through mathematical operations, two or more datasets or by combining at least one dataset with substantial additional information or other datasets;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1412

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 63

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(63) ‘in-space operations and services (ISOS)’ means activities carried out in space (on orbit and in outer space), with a view to provide services on assets in the space segment and which include the performance of tasks such as inspection, rendezvous, docking, repair, refuel, reconfiguration, manufacturing, assembling and disassembling, re-use, recycling, removal and transport of operational, non-operational and defective objects (debris) in space, with a servicer spacecraft with a high degree of autonomy, including platforms or larger structures;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1413

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 63

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 63

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(63) ‘in-space operations and services (ISOS)’ means activities carried out in space (on orbit and in outer space), with a view to provide services on assets in the space segment and which include the performance of tasks such as inspection, rendezvous, docking, repair, refuel, reconfiguration, manufacturing, assembling and disassembling, re-use, recycling, removal and transport of operational, non-operational and defective objects (debris) in space, with a servicer spacecraft with a high degree of autonomy, including platforms or larger structures;(63) ‘in-space operations and services (ISOS)’ means activities carried out in space (on orbit and in outer space), with a view to provide services on assets in the space segment and which include the performance of tasks such as inspection, rendezvous, docking, repair, refuel, reconfiguration, manufacturing, assembling and disassembling, re-use, recycling, removal and transport of operational, non-operational and defective objects (space debris) in space, with a servicer spacecraft with a high degree of autonomy, including platforms or larger structures;

Or. en

Amendment 1414

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 63

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(63) ‘in-space operations and services (ISOS)’ means activities carried out in space (on orbit and in outer space), with a view to provide services on assets in the space segment and which include the performance of tasks such as inspection, rendezvous, docking, repair, refuel, reconfiguration, manufacturing, assembling and disassembling, re-use, recycling, removal and transport of operational, non-operational and defective objects (debris) in space, with a servicer spacecraft with a high degree of autonomy, including platforms or larger structures;(63) ‘in-space operations and services (ISOS)’ means activities carried out in space (on orbit and in outer space), with a view to provide services on assets in the space segment and which include the performance of tasks such as inspection, rendezvous, docking, repair, refuel, reconfiguration, manufacturing, assembling and disassembling, re-use, recycling, removal and transport of operational, non-operational and defective objects (space debris) in space, with a servicer spacecraft with a high degree of autonomy, including platforms or larger structures;

Or. en

Amendment 1415

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 64

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(64) ‘ISOS operation’ means the execution of the planned ISOS tasks involving one or more space objects;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1416

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 64

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(64) ‘ISOS operation’ means the execution of the planned ISOS tasks involving one or more space objects;deleted

Or. en

Justification

ISOS-specific sub-definitions without independent legal weight in the obligation structure are deleted. ISOS obligations are addressed directly in Article 101 and Annex VIII.

Amendment 1417

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 65

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(65) ‘ISOS servicer spacecraft’ means a spacecraft specifically designed for the purpose of providing specific ISOS;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Consequential deletion consistent with the rationalisation of ISOS sub-definitions. The operational meaning is preserved in the Article 101 obligations.

Amendment 1418

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 65

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(65) ‘ISOS servicer spacecraft’ means a spacecraft specifically designed for the purpose of providing specific ISOS;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1419

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 66

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(66) ‘client spacecraft’ means a spacecraft that receives ISOS;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1420

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 66

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(66) ‘client spacecraft’ means a spacecraft that receives ISOS;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1421

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 66

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(66) ‘client spacecraft’ means a spacecraft that receives ISOS;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Consequential deletion.

Amendment 1422

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 67

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(67) ‘competent authority’ means a public authority established or designated as competent authority in accordance with Article 28;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1423

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 67

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(67) ‘competent authority’ means a public authority established or designated as competent authority in accordance with Article 28;(67) ‘national competent authority’ means a public authority established or designated as national competent authority in accordance with Article 28;

Or. en

Amendment 1424

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 67

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 67

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(67) ‘competent authority’ means a public authority established or designated as competent authority in accordance with Article 28;(67) ‘competent authority’ means a public authority established or designated as competent authority by a Member State;

Or. en

Amendment 1425

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 68

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(68) ‘qualified technical body for space activities’ means a technical body established in a Member State which performs technical assessment in relation to matters of safety, resilience and environmental sustainability covered by this Regulation and which has been notified to the Commission in accordance with this Regulation;(68) ‘qualified technical body for space activities’ means a technical body established in a Member State which performs technical assessment in relation to matters of safety, resilience and environmental sustainability covered by this Regulation and which has been notified by the Member States to the Commission in accordance with this Regulation;

Or. en

Amendment 1426

Jens Geier

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 68

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(68) ‘qualified technical body for space activities’ means a technical body established in a Member State which performs technical assessment in relation to matters of safety, resilience and environmental sustainability covered by this Regulation and which has been notified to the Commission in accordance with this Regulation;(68) ‘qualified technical body for space activities’ means a technical body which performs technical assessment in relation to matters of safety, resilience and environmental sustainability covered by this Regulation and, for national qualified technical bodies, which has been notified to the Commission in accordance with this Regulation;

Or. en

Amendment 1427

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 68

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(68) ‘qualified technical body for space activities’ means a technical body established in a Member State which performs technical assessment in relation to matters of safety, resilience and environmental sustainability covered by this Regulation and which has been notified to the Commission in accordance with this Regulation;(68) ‘qualified technical body’ (QTB) means a technical body which performs technical assessment in relation to matters of safety, resilience and environmental sustainability covered by this Regulation and which has been notified to the Commission in accordance with this Regulation;

Or. en

Amendment 1428

Julie Rechagneux, Aleksandar Nikolic, Mélanie Disdier, Pascale Piera, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Christophe Bay, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 68

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(68) ‘qualified technical body for space activities’ means a technical body established in a Member State which performs technical assessment in relation to matters of safety, resilience and environmental sustainability covered by this Regulation and which has been notified to the Commission in accordance with this Regulation;(68) ‘qualified technical body for space activities’ means a technical body which performs technical assessment in relation to matters of safety, resilience and environmental sustainability covered by this Regulation and may include ESA in accordance with the international agreement referred to in Article 108.

Or. en

Amendment 1429

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 70

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 70

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(70) ‘standard’ means a standard as defined in Article 2, point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012;(70) ‘standard’ means an existing generally recognised space requirement or a standard as defined in Article 2, point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012;

Or. en

Amendment 1430

Giorgio Gori, Jens Geier, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 70 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(70 a) 'European space standardisation organization and body’ means space standardisation organisations and bodies such as CEN/CENELEC, ETSI and the ECSS which has an official mandate to develop standards relevant to space systems development, manufacturing and operations;

Or. en

Amendment 1431

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 70 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(70 a) 'standardisation organisation' means an entity that develops, publishes and maintains European standards in cooperation with authorities, academia and industry;

Or. en

Amendment 1432

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 71

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(71) ‘common specifications’ means a set of technical requirements, other than a standard, that provides means of complying with the requirements applicable to the e-certificate and the light and radio pollution;(71) ‘common specification’ means a set of technical specifications as defined in Article 2 , point (4) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 providing means to comply with certain requirements laid down in this Regulation;

Or. en

Amendment 1433

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 72

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 72

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(72) ‘turnover’ means the amount derived by an undertaking within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1434

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 72

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(72) ‘turnover’ means the amount derived by an undertaking within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1435

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 72

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(72) ‘turnover’ means the amount derived by an undertaking within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1436

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 72

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(72) ‘turnover’ means the amount derived by an undertaking within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1437

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 73

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 73

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(73) ‘Union Space Label’ means a document issued by the European Union Agency for the Union Space Programme established in Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 (‘the Agency’) attesting that a given space object has been evaluated for compliance with the specific safety, resilience, or environmental sustainability requirements laid down in a Union Space Labelling Scheme;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1438

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 73

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(73) ‘Union Space Label’ means a document issued by the European Union Agency for the Union Space Programme established in Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 (‘the Agency’) attesting that a given space object has been evaluated for compliance with the specific safety, resilience, or environmental sustainability requirements laid down in a Union Space Labelling Scheme;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1439

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 73

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(73) ‘Union Space Label’ means a document issued by the European Union Agency for the Union Space Programme established in Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 (‘the Agency’) attesting that a given space object has been evaluated for compliance with the specific safety, resilience, or environmental sustainability requirements laid down in a Union Space Labelling Scheme;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1440

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 74

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(74) ‘Union Space Labelling Scheme’ means a comprehensive set of rules, technical requirements, standards and procedures established at Union level that apply to the compliance check of products, processes, services, including testing and inspection activities carried out in relation to matters of safety, resilience or environmental sustainability;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1441

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 74

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 74

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(74) ‘Union Space Labelling Scheme’ means a comprehensive set of rules, technical requirements, standards and procedures established at Union level that apply to the compliance check of products, processes, services, including testing and inspection activities carried out in relation to matters of safety, resilience or environmental sustainability;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1442

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 74

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(74) ‘Union Space Labelling Scheme’ means a comprehensive set of rules, technical requirements, standards and procedures established at Union level that apply to the compliance check of products, processes, services, including testing and inspection activities carried out in relation to matters of safety, resilience or environmental sustainability;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1443

Jens Geier

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 75

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(75) ‘critical design review’ means the stage in the engineering, manufacturing and development process, which determines that the systems and subsystems design and configuration satisfy all specified requirements of the space mission, in terms of performance, compatibility, product specifications, assessment of risks, preliminary test planning, adequacy of preliminary operation and provision of supporting documents, enabling to proceed to system implementation and integration.(75) ‘system requirement review’ means the stage in the engineering, manufacturing and development process which releases updated technical requirements specifications, assesses the preliminary design definitions and the preliminary verification program.

Or. en

Amendment 1444

Julie Rechagneux, Aleksandar Nikolic, Mélanie Disdier, Pascale Piera, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Christophe Bay, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 75

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(75) ‘critical design review’ means the stage in the engineering, manufacturing and development process, which determines that the systems and subsystems design and configuration satisfy all specified requirements of the space mission, in terms of performance, compatibility, product specifications, assessment of risks, preliminary test planning, adequacy of preliminary operation and provision of supporting documents, enabling to proceed to system implementation and integration.(75) ‘system requirement review’ means the stage in the engineering, manufacturing and development process which releases updated technical requirements specifications, assesses the preliminary design definitions and the preliminary verification programme.

Or. en

Amendment 1445

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Title II – Chapter I – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
I AUTHORISATION OF UNION SPACE OPERATORSI AUTHORISATION OF SPACE ACTIVITIES BY UNION SPACE OPERATORS

Or. en

Amendment 1446

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Title II – Chapter I – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
I AUTHORISATION OF UNION SPACE OPERATORSI INTERNAL MARKET AUTHORISATION OF UNION SPACE ACTIVITIES

Or. en

Amendment 1447

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Title II – Chapter I – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
I AUTHORISATION OF UNION SPACE OPERATORSI MARKET AUTHORISATION OF SPACE ACTIVITIES

Or. en

Justification

Reflects the fundamental shift from a Member State-based national authorisation system to a single EU-wide market access authorisation valid throughout the Union.

Amendment 1448

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Union space operators shall not provide space services unless they have obtained in a Member State an authorisation to carry out space activities which demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, depending on the category of space operator concerned.1. Union space operators shall not provide space services unless they have obtained in a Member State an authorisation to carry out space activities for the same space services which demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, depending on the category of space operator concerned.
Authorisation shall not be issued for space tourism activities. To this end, authorisation shall not be issued for any activity involving the transport, accommodation or participation of natural persons for leisure purposes in outer space.

Or. fr

Amendment 1449

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Union space operators shall not provide space services unless they have obtained in a Member State an authorisation to carry out space activities which demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, depending on the category of space operator concerned.1. A Union space operator may only provide a space service within the Union where it is in possession of a valid EUSA authorisation issued by the Agency in accordance with this Chapter, demonstrating compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, depending on the category of space operator concerned, and that the operator provides the necessary guarantees of reliability, professional competence and financial capacity for the safe and continuous conduct of the relevant space activity.

Or. en

Justification

The shift from 27 national competent authorities to a single Agency issuing a 'EUSA authorisation' valid throughout the Union is the central simplification of the package. Under the Commission text, an operator active in multiple Member States required multiple national authorisations. The EUSA replaces all of these with a single procedure, a single technical assessment and a single compliance certificate. This is the single market for space the industry has been asking for.

Amendment 1450

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Union space operators shall not provide space services unless they have obtained in a Member State an authorisation to carry out space activities which demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, depending on the category of space operator concerned.1. A Union space operator may only provide a space service within the Union when it possesses valid authorisation issued by the national competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant has its main place of establishment to carry out the space activities necessary for that service. For Union-owned assets, the competent authority issuing the authorisation shall be the Commission. There shall be only one authorisation required per activity.

Or. en

Amendment 1451

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 1

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Union space operators shall not provide space services unless they have obtained in a Member State an authorisation to carry out space activities which demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, depending on the category of space operator concerned.1. Union space operators shall only provide space services under a valid authorization to carry out space activities issued by a competent authority as specified under Article 7.

Or. en

Amendment 1452

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Union space operators shall not provide space services unless they have obtained in a Member State an authorisation to carry out space activities which demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, depending on the category of space operator concerned.1. Space operators shall not provide space services in the Union unless they have obtained in a Member State an authorisation to carry out space activities which demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V depending on the category of space operator concerned.

Or. en

Justification

This is a horizontal amendment, to be applied where relevant, replacing Union space operators with space operators in general, in line with the principle of equal application of the act to those operating in EU.

Amendment 1453

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. The authorisation shall be issued by the competent authority of the Member State where that applicant intends to operate or respectively launch.

Or. en

Amendment 1454

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. A Member State shall recognise the authorisations issued by another Member State as regards the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V.2. Where more than one Member State, excersises jurisdiction over a space activity, a Member State shall recognise the authorisations issued by another Member State as regards the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V.

Or. en

Amendment 1455

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. A Member State shall recognise the authorisations issued by another Member State as regards the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V.2. The EUSA authorisation shall be valid throughout the Union. Member States shall not require Union space operators to obtain any additional authorisation or to demonstrate compliance with requirements beyond those set out in this Regulation.

Or. en

Justification

The EUSA authorisation is valid throughout the Union without any additional national requirement.

Amendment 1456

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. A Member State shall recognise the authorisations issued by another Member State as regards the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V.2. A Member State shall recognise the authorisations issued by another Member State. The competent authorities of those Member States shall ensure coordination to facilitate their respective authorisation processes.

Or. en

Amendment 1457

Angelika Niebler, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. A Member State shall recognise the authorisations issued by another Member State as regards the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V.2. A Member State shall recognise the authorisations issued by another Member State or by the Commission as regards the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V.

Or. en

Amendment 1458

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2a. This Regulation shall not prevent Member States from establishing, in exercise of their national competences as defined in paragraph 1 of Article 4, additional authorisation regimes for space activities under their jurisdiction. In that regard, Member States may, in particular, impose stricter requirements for these additional regimes than those established at Union level, notably with regard to safety, resilience of space systems and infrastructure, and environmental protection and sustainability. Those requirements may include, where appropriate, stricter rules on risk assessment, collision avoidance, space debris management or reduction of the environmental footprint of the activities concerned.

Or. fr

Amendment 1459

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
An authorisation shall be issued by the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant is established and, as applicable, by the competent authority of the Member State where that applicant intends to operate or respectively launch, if different from the Member State of establishment.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1460

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
An authorisation shall be issued by the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant is established and, as applicable, by the competent authority of the Member State where that applicant intends to operate or respectively launch, if different from the Member State of establishment.An authorisation shall be issued by the following authorization authorities:
(a) the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant has its main place of establishment;
(b) the Commission for Union-owned assets.
For the purposes of this Regulation, “authorising authorities” means the entities whose authorisation is required, pursuant to the first subparagraph, as regards a given space activity.

Or. en

Amendment 1461

Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
An authorisation shall be issued by the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant is established and, as applicable, by the competent authority of the Member State where that applicant intends to operate or respectively launch, if different from the Member State of establishment.An authorisation shall be issued by the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant is established.

Or. en

Amendment 1462

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
An authorisation shall be issued by the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant is established and, as applicable, by the competent authority of the Member State where that applicant intends to operate or respectively launch, if different from the Member State of establishment.The Agency shall issue the EUSA authorisation on the basis of the technical opinion issued by the qualified technical body designated pursuant to Article 8.

Or. en

Justification

The Agency issues the EUSA authorisation, acting on the technical opinion of the qualified technical body (ESA under Article 8). This creates a clear two-step process with a defined division of responsibility between technical expertise and legal decision-making. One issuing authority for the whole Union eliminates the inconsistency and delay of 27 separate national procedures.

Amendment 1463

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
An authorisation shall be issued by the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant is established and, as applicable, by the competent authority of the Member State where that applicant intends to operate or respectively launch, if different from the Member State of establishment.An authorisation shall be issued by the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant is established or, at the applicant's choice, by the competent authority of the Member State where that applicant intends to operate or respectively launch. The competent authorities concerned shall coordinate to avoid duplication of requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 1464

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
An authorisation shall be issued by the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant is established and, as applicable, by the competent authority of the Member State where that applicant intends to operate or respectively launch, if different from the Member State of establishment.Union space operators shall request an authorisation to the competent authority of the Member State in which the applicant is established or to the competent authority of the Member State where that applicant intends to operate or respectively launch, if different from the Member State of establishment.

Or. en

Amendment 1465

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
When submitting an authorisation application, Union space operators shall document whether Union launch services have been considered for the planned mission. Where a third-country launch service is selected, the operator shall provide to the competent authority a brief justification of the reasons why a Union launch service was not used.

Or. en

Amendment 1466

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The competent authorities of those Member States shall ensure coordination to facilitate their respective authorisation processes.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1467

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The competent authorities of those Member States shall ensure coordination to facilitate their respective authorisation processes.The national competent authorities of those Member States shall ensure coordination to facilitate their respective authorisation processes. To this end, those Member States shall develop a process for mutual recognition of authorisation.

Or. en

Justification

The amendment on changing 'competent authorities' to 'national competent authority' shall be repetitive and apply to the whole text.

Amendment 1468

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The competent authorities of those Member States shall ensure coordination to facilitate their respective authorisation processes.Member States may enter into agreements in order to allocate the authorization and supervision responsibilities attached to a space activity. Such agreements shall be notified to the Commission.

Or. en

Amendment 1469

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 4

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. For the purposes of delivering an authorisation, a competent authority shall take into account the opinion issued by the qualified technical body for space activities in the context of technical assessments carried out in accordance with Article 8.4. For the purposes of delivering an authorisation, a competent authority shall take into account the opinion issued by the qualified technical body for space activities in accordance with Article 8.

Or. en

Amendment 1470

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. For the purposes of delivering an authorisation, a competent authority shall take into account the opinion issued by the qualified technical body for space activities in the context of technical assessments carried out in accordance with Article 8.4. For the purposes of delivering a EUSA authorisation, the Agency shall take into account the opinion issued by the qualified technical body designated pursuant to Article 8 in the context of technical assessments carried out in accordance with that Article.

Or. en

Justification

Consequential: the Agency takes the authorisation decision on the basis of the qualified technical body's opinion. The provision ensures that the Agency's decision cannot deviate from that opinion without explicit reasoned justification.

Amendment 1471

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Union space operators intending to have recourse to the space services provided by a third country space operator or an international organisation shall demonstrate to the relevant competent authorities, in their application for authorisation, the registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation, in accordance with Article 17 or Article 18, respectively.deleted

Or. en

Justification

The obligation for a Union operator to separately notify and involve the competent national authority regarding use of third-country space services is redundant under the EUSA system: the authorisation application to the Agency already covers the full mission architecture, including use of third-party services

Amendment 1472

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Union space operators intending to have recourse to the space services provided by a third country space operator or an international organisation shall demonstrate to the relevant competent authorities, in their application for authorisation, the registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation, in accordance with Article 17 or Article 18, respectively.When Union Space operators request an authorisation that include space services provided by a third country space operator or an international organisation, the competent authority shall check that the third country operator is registered in URSO, in accordance with Article 17.

Or. en

Amendment 1473

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Union space operators intending to have recourse to the space services provided by a third country space operator or an international organisation shall demonstrate to the relevant competent authorities, in their application for authorisation, the registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation, in accordance with Article 17 or Article 18, respectively.Union space operators intending to have recourse to the space services provided by a third country space operator or an international organisation shall inform the relevant competent authorities, in their application for authorisation, on the status of the registration in URSA of activitites carried out by that third country space operator or international organisation, in accordance with Article 17 or Article 18, respectively.

Or. en

Amendment 1474

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Union space operators intending to have recourse to the space services provided by a third country space operator or an international organisation shall demonstrate to the relevant competent authorities, in their application for authorisation, the registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation, in accordance with Article 17 or Article 18, respectively.Union space operators intending to have recourse to the space services provided by a third country space operator or an international organisation shall demonstrate to the relevant competent authorities, in their application for authorisation, the validity of the registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation, in accordance with Article 17 or Article 18, respectively.

Or. fr

Amendment 1475

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Union space operators intending to have recourse to the space services provided by a third country space operator or an international organisation shall demonstrate to the relevant competent authorities, in their application for authorisation, the registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation, in accordance with Article 17 or Article 18, respectively.Union space operators intending to have recourse to the space services provided by a third country space operator shall demonstrate to the relevant competent authorities, in their application for authorisation, the registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation, in accordance with Article 17 or Article 18, respectively.

Or. en

Amendment 1476

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the procedure of registration in URSO has not been completed yet, the Union space operator shall coordinate closely with the third country space operator or international organisation, the relevant competent authority and the Agency, including by requiring updates on the status of the registration process.deleted

Or. fr

Amendment 1477

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the procedure of registration in URSO has not been completed yet, the Union space operator shall coordinate closely with the third country space operator or international organisation, the relevant competent authority and the Agency, including by requiring updates on the status of the registration process.deleted

Or. en

Justification

Consequential deletion: the national authority coordination procedure for third-country space operator URSA status is subsumed into the centralised Agency-managed process.

Amendment 1478

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the procedure of registration in URSO has not been completed yet, the Union space operator shall coordinate closely with the third country space operator or international organisation, the relevant competent authority and the Agency, including by requiring updates on the status of the registration process.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1479

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the procedure of registration in URSO has not been completed yet, the Union space operator shall coordinate closely with the third country space operator or international organisation, the relevant competent authority and the Agency, including by requiring updates on the status of the registration process.Where the procedure of registration in URSA has not been completed yet, the Union space operator shall coordinate closely with the third country space operator or international organisation, the relevant competent authority and the Agency, including by requiring updates on the status of the registration process.

Or. en

Amendment 1480

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the procedure of registration in URSO has not been completed yet, the Union space operator shall coordinate closely with the third country space operator or international organisation, the relevant competent authority and the Agency, including by requiring updates on the status of the registration process.Where the procedure of registration in URSO has not been completed yet, the Union space operator shall coordinate closely with the third country space operator, the relevant competent authority and the Agency, including by requiring updates on the status of the registration process.

Or. en

Amendment 1481

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Agency shall immediately provide such updates to avoid unnecessary delay in the authorisation process of the Union space operator.deleted

Or. fr

Amendment 1482

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Agency shall immediately provide such updates to avoid unnecessary delay in the authorisation process of the Union space operator.deleted

Or. en

Justification

Consequential deletion: the Agency update obligation to avoid delay in national authorisation is replaced by the integrated single-window EUSA process.

Amendment 1483

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Agency shall immediately provide such updates to avoid unnecessary delay in the authorisation process of the Union space operator.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1484

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Agency shall immediately provide such updates to avoid unnecessary delay in the authorisation process of the Union space operator.The Agency shall immediately provide such updates in the authorisation process of the Union space operator.

Or. en

Amendment 1485

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Where the need for the provision of space services by a third country space operator or international organisation arises after an authorisation has been issued, such as in the case of ISOS, a Union space operator shall, without delay, inform the competent authority thereof, and provide it with the proof of registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1486

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Where the need for the provision of space services by a third country space operator or international organisation arises after an authorisation has been issued, such as in the case of ISOS, a Union space operator shall, without delay, inform the competent authority thereof, and provide it with the proof of registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation.6. Where the need for the provision of space services by a third country space operator or international organisation arises after an authorisation has been issued, such as in the case of ISOS, a Union space operator shall, without delay, inform the competent authority thereof, and provide it with the proof of registration in URSA of the activities carried out by that third country space operator or international organisation.

Or. en

Amendment 1487

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Where the need for the provision of space services by a third country space operator or international organisation arises after an authorisation has been issued, such as in the case of ISOS, a Union space operator shall, without delay, inform the competent authority thereof, and provide it with the proof of registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation.6. Where the need for the provision of space services by a third country space operator arises after an authorisation has been issued, such as in the case of ISOS, a Union space operator shall, without delay, inform the competent authority thereof, and provide it with the proof of registration in URSO of that third country space operator.

Or. en

Amendment 1488

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Where the need for the provision of space services by a third country space operator or international organisation arises after an authorisation has been issued, such as in the case of ISOS, a Union space operator shall, without delay, inform the competent authority thereof, and provide it with the proof of registration in URSO of that third country space operator or international organisation.6. Where a space activity has been authorised and that activity subsequently requires the use of ISOS space services provided by a space operator from a third country or an international organisation, ISOS provision may only take place once the Agency has updated the EUSA authorisation to include the e-certificate of that provider, registered in URSA pursuant to Article 17 or Article 18.

Or. en

Justification

Streamlining the post-authorisation procedure for incorporating ISOS services: instead of triggering a new national notification, the operator updates the Agency.

Amendment 1489

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article6a
Authorisation of transfer or assumption of control
1. Any transfer to a third party of control over a space object or a coordinated group of space objects that has been authorised under this Regulation shall be subject to prior authorisation by the Agency.
2. Any spacecraft operator intending to assume control of a space object or a coordinated group of space objects not previously authorised under this Regulation shall obtain prior authorisation for that purpose.
3. The Agency shall grant the authorisation referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 only after verifying that the new operator satisfies the requirements laid down in this Regulation, including those relating to safety, resilience, environmental sustainability, financial capacity and liability coverage.

Or. en

Justification

A transfer of control changes the entity responsible for compliance, operational safety and liability coverage. It must therefore remain subject to prior regulatory scrutiny. This amendment closes a clear oversight gap and ensures continuity of responsibility.

Amendment 1490

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Authorisation processTechnical file

Or. en

Amendment 1491

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. An applicant shall apply for authorisation to the competent authority referred to in Article 6(3).1. An applicant shall apply for authorisation to the competent authority referred to in Article 6(1a).

Or. en

Amendment 1492

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. An applicant shall apply for authorisation to the competent authority referred to in Article 6(3).1. An applicant shall apply for authorisation to the competent authority referred to in Article 6(1).

Or. en

Amendment 1493

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. An applicant shall apply for authorisation to the competent authority referred to in Article 6(3).1. An applicant for a EUSA authorisation shall submit its application to the Agency.

Or. en

Justification

Applications are submitted to the Agency, not to a national competent authority. One application, one authority — the foundational simplification of the Title II architecture. Operators dealing with cross-border missions no longer need to identify and coordinate with multiple national contact points.

Amendment 1494

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. The Commission shall adopt an implementing act to define a single authorisation process based on a risk profile assessement. The Commission shall define, in close cooperation with public authorities of the Member States, an assessement based on specific technical information and specific risk categories. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2).

Or. en

Amendment 1495

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The application for authorisation shall contain a technical file with all necessary documentation and supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.2. The application for a EUSA authorisation shall contain a technical file with all necessary documentation and supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, and in particular:
(a) for launch operators, the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 1, and Title IV, Chapters II to V;
(b) for spacecraft operators, the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 2, and Title IV, Chapters II to V, and the mission duration;
(c) for constellations, all documentation necessary to demonstrate compliance with Article 9(1);
(d) where a space operator from a third country or international organisation is involved in the space activity, the information on the status of, or plans for, registration in URSA pursuant to Article 17 or Article 18.

Or. en

Justification

The technical file is submitted to the Agency. The scope of the file is broadened to cover all requirements of the Regulation, not only Title IV Chapters I–V, consistent with the single authorisation covering the operator's full compliance across all titles.

Amendment 1496

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The application for authorisation shall contain a technical file with all necessary documentation and supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.2. The application for authorisation shall contain a technical file with all necessary documentation and supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts to make available harmonised templates for the technical file. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2).

Or. en

Amendment 1497

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The application for authorisation shall contain a technical file with all necessary documentation and supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.2. The application for authorisation shall contain a technical file to demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.

Or. en

Amendment 1498

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. In its application for authorisation, the applicant shall indicate to the competent authority which qualified technical bodies for space activities the applicant intends to use for the technical assessment of the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.3. Within 15 working days of receipt of the application, the Agency shall assess whether the application is complete. Where an application is incomplete or requires clarification, the Agency shall set a deadline for the applicant to provide the additional information. The deadline referred to in paragraph 5 shall be suspended until that information is received. The Agency shall notify the applicant once satisfied that the application is complete.

Or. en

Justification

The Agency performs completeness assessment within 15 working days. Specifying the completeness check timeframe provides legal certainty for operators: the clock on the substantive assessment does not start until completeness is confirmed, and operators know precisely when they must expect a completeness decision.

Amendment 1499

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. When assessing the application, the Agency shall, where the space activity concerned is liable, in the event of disruption, degradation, denial, manipulation or loss of effective control, to seriously affect public security, public safety, civil protection, governmental continuity, critical infrastructure, essential services, Union space programmes or the resilience of the Union economy, verify that the operator retains effective control within the Union over the functions essential to the conduct, continuity, security and recovery of that activity.
Compliance with that requirement shall constitute a condition for the granting of the authorisation.

Or. en

Justification

Security review is integrated into the authorisation process: where the space activity could affect public security if disrupted, the Agency verifies effective control within the Union as part of the standard assessment.

Amendment 1500

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States shall establish processes to allow competent authorities to transmit the technical file to qualified technical bodies for space activities indicated by the applicant, or to allow the applicant to address directly the qualified technical bodies for space activities.4. Member States shall establish processes to allow competent authorities to transmit the technical file to qualified technical bodies for space activities indicated by the applicant, or to allow the applicant to address directly the qualified technical bodies for space activities.
A qualified technical body shall examine the application and assess and inform whether the application is complete within 20 working days, and in the situation where the application is incomplete, or where further clarification is needed, the qualified technical body shall set a deadline by which the applicant shall provide any additional information.
The respective qualified technical body shall notify the applicant once satisfied that the application is complete and sufficiently clear.

Or. en

Amendment 1501

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States shall establish processes to allow competent authorities to transmit the technical file to qualified technical bodies for space activities indicated by the applicant, or to allow the applicant to address directly the qualified technical bodies for space activities.4. The Agency shall transmit the complete technical file to the qualified technical body designated pursuant to Article 8 without delay for technical assessment.

Or. en

Justification

The Agency transmits the complete file to the qualified technical body without delay, ensuring the technical assessment begins as soon as completeness is confirmed.

Amendment 1502

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Where the authorising authority is the Commission, the Agency shall assess the application for authorisation and notify the applicant of the outcome of its preliminary assessment. The Union space operator of Union-owned assets shall be able to submit a reasoned statement and to provide additional explanation or evidence. The Agency shall issue a reasoned opinion proposing to the Commission to issue or refuse an authorisation.

Or. en

Amendment 1503

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
A qualified technical body for space activities shall assess the fulfilment of the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, and, within 6 months from the date of receipt of the technical file, shall issue an opinion as regards the compliance of the envisaged space activities with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.A qualified technical body for space activities shall assess the fulfilment of the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, and, within 6 months from the date of receipt of the technical file, shall issue an opinion in this respect.

Or. en

Amendment 1504

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
A qualified technical body for space activities shall assess the fulfilment of the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, and, within 6 months from the date of receipt of the technical file, shall issue an opinion as regards the compliance of the envisaged space activities with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.A qualified technical body for space activities shall assess the fulfilment of the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, and, as soon as possible within the deadline set by the relevant Member State but no later than 6 months from the date of receipt of the technical file, shall issue an opinion as regards the compliance of the envisaged space activities with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.

Or. en

Amendment 1505

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
A qualified technical body for space activities shall assess the fulfilment of the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, and, within 6 months from the date of receipt of the technical file, shall issue an opinion as regards the compliance of the envisaged space activities with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.The qualified technical body shall assess the fulfilment of the applicable requirements laid down in Title IV, and, within 2 months from the date of notification of completeness referred to in paragraph 3, shall issue a technical opinion to the Agency as to the compliance of the envisaged space activities with those requirements.

Or. en

Justification

Having the technical assessment timeframe from 6 months to 2 months responds directly to industry feedback that the Commission's timeline is commercially unworkable for the satellite manufacturing and launch cycles. The 2-month timeframe is realistic for a single focused qualified technical body with full-time space expertise and dedicated assessment teams.

Amendment 1506

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
A qualified technical body for space activities shall assess the fulfilment of the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, and, within 6 months from the date of receipt of the technical file, shall issue an opinion as regards the compliance of the envisaged space activities with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.A qualified technical body for space activities shall assess the fulfilment of the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable, and, no later than 3 months from the date of receipt of the technical file, shall issue an opinion as regards the compliance of the envisaged space activities with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, as applicable.

Or. en

Amendment 1507

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Competent authorities shall take utmost account of the technical assessment carried out in relation to Title IV, Chapter II, by the qualified technical bodies for space activities, pursuant to Article 8(2), third subparagraph.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1508

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Competent authorities shall take utmost account of the technical assessment carried out in relation to Title IV, Chapter II, by the qualified technical bodies for space activities, pursuant to Article 8(2), third subparagraph.Competent authorities shall base their decision on the technical assessment carried out in relation to Title IV, Chapter II, by the qualified technical bodies for space activities, pursuant to Article 8(2), third subparagraph.

Or. en

Amendment 1509

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Within 12 months from the date of receipt of the application, the competent authority shall issue the authorisation or reject the application and shall inform the applicant thereof.As soon as possible within the deadline set by the relevant Member State but no later than 12 months from the date of receipt of the application, the competent authority shall issue the authorisation or reject the application and shall inform the applicant thereof.

Or. en

Amendment 1510

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Within 12 months from the date of receipt of the application, the competent authority shall issue the authorisation or reject the application and shall inform the applicant thereof.Within 3 months from the date of receipt of the application, the Agency shall issue the EUSA authorisation or reject the application, taking into account the opinion referred to in paragraph 5, and shall inform the applicant thereof.

Or. en

Justification

Reducing the overall authorisation timeframe from 12 months to 3 months reflects the efficiencies of the centralised single-authority model. One Agency, one qualified technical body, one coordinated process.

Amendment 1511

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Within 12 months from the date of receipt of the application, the competent authority shall issue the authorisation or reject the application and shall inform the applicant thereof.Within a maximum of 12 months from the date of receipt of the application, the competent authority shall issue the authorisation or reject the application and shall inform the applicant thereof, justifying the rejection.

Or. en

Amendment 1512

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Within 12 months from the date of receipt of the application, the competent authority shall issue the authorisation or reject the application and shall inform the applicant thereof.No later than 6 months from the date of receipt of a complete application, the competent authority shall issue the authorisation or reject the application and shall inform the applicant thereof.

Or. en

Amendment 1513

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, Michał Szczerba, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Within 12 months from the date of receipt of the application, the competent authority shall issue the authorisation or reject the application and shall inform the applicant thereof.No later than 6 months from the date of receipt of the application, the competent authority shall issue the authorisation or reject the application and shall inform the applicant thereof.

Or. en

Amendment 1514

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The deadline shall be suspended until the complete information is provided by the applicant upon request by the competent authority.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1515

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The deadline shall be suspended until the complete information is provided by the applicant upon request by the competent authority.The deadline shall be suspended until the complete information is provided by the applicant upon request by the competent authority.
The decision shall take effect upon its notification to the applicant. If 6 months after the date of registration no decision has been issued, it shall be deemed to be approved.

Or. en

Amendment 1516

Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The deadline shall be suspended until the complete information is provided by the applicant upon request by the competent authority.The decision shall take effect upon its notification to the applicant. If no decision has been issued within 6 months from the date of application for registration, the applicant shall be informed without undue delay of the reasons for the delay and the expected timeframe for issuing the decision;

Or. en

Amendment 1517

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Qualified technical bodies and competent priorities shall give priority, in the exercise of their respective obligations in points 5 and 6, to urgent applications aimed at addressing the creation of potential space debris.

Or. en

Amendment 1518

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
A Union space operator shall immediately report any change in its situation that may require a modification of its authorisation;

Or. en

Amendment 1519

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Authorisations may be suspended or withdrawn in accordance with the provisions laid down in this Regulation;

Or. en

Amendment 1520

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new)

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6 a. In case the competent authority fails to take the decision within the deadline in accordance with paragraph 6, the application for authorisation is deemed to be approved.

Or. en

Amendment 1521

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. For the purposes of registration in URSO, a competent authority shall inform the Agency of all authorised Union space operators and primary space services providers and of any third country space operator they have authorised to launch from their territory.7. Following the issuance of the EUSA authorisation pursuant to paragraph 6, the Agency shall register the Union space operator in URSA and shall issue the e-certificate referred to in Article 25.

Or. en

Justification

Registration in URSA follows automatically from EUSA authorisation. The Agency registers the operator and issues the e-certificate as a single integrated post-authorisation step. Administrative simplification: one action by the Agency produces the three compliance instruments the operator needs (authorisation, registration, certificate).

Amendment 1522

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. For the purposes of registration in URSO, a competent authority shall inform the Agency of all authorised Union space operators and primary space services providers and of any third country space operator they have authorised to launch from their territory.7. For the purposes of registration in URSA, a competent authority shall inform the Agency of all authorised space activities by Union space operators and primary space services providers and of any third country space operator they have authorised to launch from their territory.

Or. en

Amendment 1523

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7a. Following notification of the authorisation, the space services provider shall inform the competent authority without delay if:
(a) it intends to significantly modify the conditions for implementation of the operation;
(b) it intends to carry out or benefit from an activity not covered by the authorisation;
(c) there is a substantial change to the information provided in the application dossier referred to in paragraph 2.

Or. fr

Amendment 1524

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article7a
Security and defence filter for authorisation
1. An authorisation shall not be granted where:
(a) the applicant is controlled, directly or indirectly, by a natural or legal person of a third country that has been identified as raising security concerns in relation to the security and defence interests of the Union or of one or more Member States; or
(b) the space operation for which the authorisation is sought is, having regard to the systems or payloads intended to be used or deployed, liable to jeopardise the security and defence interests of the Union or of one or more Member States, or the compliance by the Union or Member States with their international obligations under the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space.
2. Before taking a decision on the basis of paragraph 1, the Agency shall consult the relevant national defence and security authorities. That consultation shall be completed within 60 days of the submission of the complete application file. The Agency may extend that period by a further 30 days where the complexity of the security assessment so requires.
3. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish guidelines identifying categories of space operations that may be subject to the examination referred to in paragraph 1(b), taking into account in particular dual-use aspects of payloads or systems, as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 114(3).

Or. en

Justification

The security filter codifies in law what every responsible authorisation authority already does in practice: verify that operators of security-sensitive space assets are not controlled by third-country interests that could jeopardise EU security or defence. The provision applies where disruption or loss of control could seriously affect public security, critical infrastructure or governmental continuity — the same risk criteria used in EU foreign investment screening.

Amendment 1525

Giorgio Gori, Jens Geier, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 7a
Mission extension
1. Where a spacecraft operator wishes to extend a space mission, that spacecraft operator shall submit to the competent authority a request to extend a space mission, at the latest 3 months before the planned end of the concerned space mission.
2. Upon request submitted in accordance with paragraph 1, the competent authorities may decide to extend the duration of a space mission carried out by a Union spacecraft operator beyond the period for which the initial authorisation has been granted.
3. Competent authority shall approve the request for the extension of the space mission if the spacecraft still meets the requirements laid down in Annex V.

Or. en

Justification

Former article 71

Amendment 1526

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Technical assessmentsQualified technical bodies

Or. en

Amendment 1527

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Technical assessmentsQualified technical body

Or. en

Justification

Reflects the shift from a menu of national assessment options to a designated single body: the European Space Agency.

Amendment 1528

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. When setting-up the authorisation systems, Member States shall determine whether the technical assessments are to be carried out by:1. The qualified technical body for the purposes of this Regulation shall, by default, be the European Space Agency, in accordance with the conditions set out in the arrangement referred to in Article 108.
The Commission shall, through the arrangement referred to in Article 108, ensure that the European Space Agency is recognised as a qualified technical body for space activities and that the European Space Agency carries out the technical assessments of compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, as applicable.

Or. en

Justification

Designating the European Space Agency as the default qualified technical body replaces a fragmented system in which Member States could independently designate different bodies with varying expertise and capacity. ESA has unmatched technical depth across all space domains, and already applies several standards that form the technical basis of the Regulation. A single expert body provides more rigorous and more consistent technical assessments than a patchwork of national designations.

Amendment 1529

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. When setting-up the authorisation systems, Member States shall determine whether the technical assessments are to be carried out by:1. Member States shall designate one or more of the following qualified technical bodies (QTB) to carry out technical assessments in accordance with Article 7(3):

Or. en

Amendment 1530

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. When setting-up the authorisation systems, Member States shall determine whether the technical assessments are to be carried out by:1. Member States shall designate one or more of the following qualified technical bodies to carry out technical assessments in accordance with Article 7(3):

Or. en

Amendment 1531

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) qualified technical bodies for space activities;(a) qualified technical bodies at national level for space activities;

Or. en

Amendment 1532

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) qualified technical bodies for space activities;(a) a national qualified technical body for space activities;

Or. en

Amendment 1533

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) qualified technical bodies for space activities;(a) national qualified technical bodies for space activities;

Or. en

Amendment 1534

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) international organisations with specific technical expertise in matters covered by this Regulation;(b) international organisations with specific technical expertise in matters, such as the European Space Agency, covered by this Regulation and in accordance with applicable international agreements;

Or. en

Amendment 1535

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) international organisations with specific technical expertise in matters covered by this Regulation;(b) international organisations with specific technical expertise in matters covered by this Regulation, as per international agreements foreseen in Articles 107 and 108;

Or. en

Amendment 1536

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) international organisations with specific technical expertise in matters covered by this Regulation;(b) an international organisation with specific technical expertise in matters covered by this Regulation, with which an agreement is in force;

Or. en

Amendment 1537

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) combining the options referred to in points (a), (b) and (c).deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1538

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) combining the options referred to in points (a), (b) and (c).(d) international organisations that are signatories of an international agreement with the Union pursuant to Article 107 of this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 1539

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. The qualified technical body shall carry out the technical assessments and issue its technical opinion to the Agency within the timeframe set out in Article 7(5).
The European Space Agency may, under its sole responsibility, rely on the technical expertise of national space agencies or public technical entities of the Member States.
The arrangement referred to in Article 108 shall set out the terms and conditions for the provision of assessment services, including timelines, fees, quality assurance procedures, confidentiality, security, liability and rules on conflicts of interest.

Or. en

Justification

The qualified technical body carries out technical assessments and issues its opinion within the timeframes of Article 7. ESA may request the support of national space agencies or public technical entities where it lacks sufficient capacity, preserving the depth of European technical expertise across the system while maintaining clear accountability.

Amendment 1540

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 b. The qualified technical body designated pursuant to paragraph 1 shall meet the requirements laid down in Article 35 and Annex IX.
Where the European Space Agency relies on the technical expertise of national space agencies or public technical entities of the Member States pursuant to paragraph 1a, it shall ensure that such expertise is used under conditions equivalent to those requirements and under its sole responsibility.

Or. en

Justification

The qualified technical body must meet the requirements of Annex IX. Where ESA relies on national agency expertise, ESA remains solely responsible for the quality and conclusions of the technical opinion. This preserves accountability without preventing efficient use of the European technical expert community.

Amendment 1541

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Member States that intend to make use of the system referred to in paragraph 1, point (a), shall ensure that qualified technical bodies for space activities are established on their territory.deleted
For the purposes of carrying out technical assessments on any matters covered by Title IV, Chapters I to V, Member States shall use qualified technical bodies for space activities established in their territory.
Member States shall ensure that the competent authority established pursuant to Article 8(1), of Directive 2022/2555 shall be competent for carrying out the technical assessment on matters covered by Title IV, Chapter II, in respect to Union space operators, excluding when operating assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (20).

Or. en

Justification

The national route to designating qualified technical bodies (through Member State notification) is deleted as a consequence of ESA's designation as the single default qualified technical body.

Amendment 1542

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Member States that intend to make use of the system referred to in paragraph 1, point (a), shall ensure that qualified technical bodies for space activities are established on their territory.deleted
For the purposes of carrying out technical assessments on any matters covered by Title IV, Chapters I to V, Member States shall use qualified technical bodies for space activities established in their territory.
Member States shall ensure that the competent authority established pursuant to Article 8(1), of Directive 2022/2555 shall be competent for carrying out the technical assessment on matters covered by Title IV, Chapter II, in respect to Union space operators, excluding when operating assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (20).

Or. en

Amendment 1543

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
For the purposes of carrying out technical assessments on any matters covered by Title IV, Chapters I to V, Member States shall use qualified technical bodies for space activities established in their territory.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1544

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Space services providers referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), which provide technical assessment activities shall meet the requirements laid down in Title III, Chapter I, Section 3.deleted
Member States that make use of the system referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), shall ensure judicial enforcement of the obligation referred to in the first subparagraph.

Or. en

Justification

Consequential deletion: the separate regime for self-assessment by space services providers is removed as the single-body ESA assessment model replaces it.

Amendment 1545

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Space services providers referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), which provide technical assessment activities shall meet the requirements laid down in Title III, Chapter I, Section 3.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1546

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Space services providers referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), which provide technical assessment activities shall meet the requirements laid down in Title III, Chapter I, Section 3.International organisations referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), which provide technical assessment activities shall meet the requirements laid down in Title III, Chapter I, Section 3.

Or. en

Amendment 1547

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Member States that make use of the system referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), shall ensure judicial enforcement of the obligation referred to in the first subparagraph.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1548

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Member States that make use of the system referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), shall ensure judicial enforcement of the obligation referred to in the first subparagraph.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1549

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States shall notify to the Commission their choice pursuant to paragraph 1 and any changes thereof.deleted

Or. en

Justification

Consequential deletion: Member State notifications of qualified technical body choices are no longer required once ESA is designated by default.

Amendment 1550

Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Member States shall recognise technical assessments carried out by a QTB designated in another Member State, provided that the QTB has been notified to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 4. Such mutual recognition shall cover all technical evaluations relevant to compliance with the provisions of this Regulation, unless a Member State can demonstrate legitimate grounds related to safety or security for requiring an additional assessment.

Or. en

Amendment 1551

Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The competent authority and any Qualified Technical Body shall ensure the highest level of protection of sensitive industrial information obtained in the context of authorisation procedures. Such information shall be treated as strictly 18 confidential and shall not be used for any purpose other than the assessment and oversight tasks under this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 1552

Massimiliano Salini

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. In the context of authorisation procedure, the competent authority and any Qualified Technical Body shall ensure the highest level of protection of sesitive industrial information. Such information shall be treated as strictly confidential and shall not be used for any purpose other than the assessment under this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 1553

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Authorisation for constellationsSpecific provisions for constellations

Or. en

Amendment 1554

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the Union space operator intends to carry out a space mission that entails the launch of a satellite constellation, it shall submit to the competent authority an application for a single authorisation covering the launch or, as applicable, the launch and operation, in respect to all satellites that are part of the constellation, provided that all of the following conditions are met:The launch and operation of a satellite constellation by a Union space operator shall be authorised only if the constellation pursues an objective of general interest, contributing in particular to objectives of general interest such as connectivity, research, environmental monitoring or the development of essential services, and if it is governed, as a minimum, jointly with a public entity, be it a Member State, a public body designated by a Member State or an entity reporting directly to the Union.
Where the Union space operator intends to carry out a space mission that entails the launch of a satellite constellation, it shall submit to the competent authority an application for a single authorisation covering the launch or, as applicable, the launch and operation, in respect to all satellites that are part of the constellation, provided that all of the following conditions are met:

Or. fr

Amendment 1555

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the Union space operator intends to carry out a space mission that entails the launch of a satellite constellation, it shall submit to the competent authority an application for a single authorisation covering the launch or, as applicable, the launch and operation, in respect to all satellites that are part of the constellation, provided that all of the following conditions are met:Space activities involving a satellite constellation may be authorised through one single application, provided that they comply with the following criterion, in addition to those set out in Article 7(2):

Or. en

Amendment 1556

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the Union space operator intends to carry out a space mission that entails the launch of a satellite constellation, it shall submit to the competent authority an application for a single authorisation covering the launch or, as applicable, the launch and operation, in respect to all satellites that are part of the constellation, provided that all of the following conditions are met:Where the Union space operator intends to carry out a space mission that entails the launch of a satellite constellation, it shall submit to the competent authority an application for a single EUSA authorisation covering the launch or, as applicable, the launch and operation, in respect to all satellites that are part of the constellation.

Or. en

Amendment 1557

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the Union space operator intends to carry out a space mission that entails the launch of a satellite constellation, it shall submit to the competent authority an application for a single authorisation covering the launch or, as applicable, the launch and operation, in respect to all satellites that are part of the constellation, provided that all of the following conditions are met:Where the Union space operator intends to carry out a space mission that entails the launch of a satellite constellation, it may submit to the competent authority an application for a single authorisation covering the launch or, as applicable, the launch and operation, in respect to all satellites that are part of the constellation, provided that all of the following conditions are met:

Or. en

Amendment 1558

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the Union space operator intends to carry out a space mission that entails the launch of a satellite constellation, it shall submit to the competent authority an application for a single authorisation covering the launch or, as applicable, the launch and operation, in respect to all satellites that are part of the constellation, provided that all of the following conditions are met:Where space operators intends to carry out a space mission that entails the operation of a satellite constellation, it shall submit to the national competent authority an application for one single authorisation in accordance with Article 7 covering the operation, in respect to all satellites that are part of the constellation, provided that all of the following conditions are met:

Or. en

Amendment 1559

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission are identical and perform the same tasks in the same manner;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1560

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission are identical and perform the same tasks in the same manner;(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission share a common design baseline and perform substantially equivalent functions, with minor hardware or software variations between manufacturing batches that do not alter the safety, orbital or resilience profile of the mission

Or. en

Amendment 1561

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission are identical and perform the same tasks in the same manner;(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the space mission fulfil similar user requirements and perform the same tasks in a similar manner and comply with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V;

Or. en

Amendment 1562

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission are identical and perform the same tasks in the same manner;(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission or program which perform the same tasks in a similar manner; are identical and perform the same tasks in the same manner;

Or. en

Amendment 1563

Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission are identical and perform the same tasks in the same manner;(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission are identical and perform the same tasks in the same manner for the same clearly defined period;

Or. ro

Justification

The duration of satellite missions must be clearly defined to ensure that the activity is organised efficiently.

Amendment 1564

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission are identical and perform the same tasks in the same manner;(a) all satellites planned to be launched under the respective space mission are identical;

Or. en

Amendment 1565

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) all satellites of the constellation comply with the requirements laid down in Title IV;

Or. en

Amendment 1566

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a a) all satellites of the constellation comply with the requirements laid down in Title IV;

Or. en

Amendment 1567

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the launch of all satellites is planned to be carried out through the same launch vehicle and from the same launch site.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1568

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the launch of all satellites is planned to be carried out through the same launch vehicle and from the same launch site.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1569

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the launch of all satellites is planned to be carried out through the same launch vehicle and from the same launch site.(b) the launch of all satellites is planned to be carried out through the same launch vehicle and from the same launch site. This launcher shall not belong to a third country space operator.

Or. fr

Amendment 1570

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the launch of all satellites is planned to be carried out through the same launch vehicle and from the same launch site.(b) the launch of all satellites is planned to be carried out using the same launch vehicle type or a functionally equivalent launch vehicle type providing comparable orbital insertion parameters.

Or. en

Amendment 1571

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the launch of all satellites is planned to be carried out through the same launch vehicle and from the same launch site.(b) the launch of all satellites for the space mission is planned to be carried out with URSO-registered types of launch and from the same launch site.

Or. en

Amendment 1572

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) the launch of all satellites is planned to be carried out through the same launch vehicle and from the same launch site.(b) the launch of all satellites for the space mission is planned to be carried out with URSA-registered types of launch vehicles;

Or. en

Amendment 1573

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) paragraphs (a) and (b) do not apply when minor design improvements or corrections to the spacecraft do not change the performance. Nonetheless, Union space operators shall inform the national competent authority of the modifications. This national competent authority shall assess in accordance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, whether re-authorisation is needed.

Or. en

Amendment 1574

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ba) the constellation pursues an objective of general interest, in accordance with paragraph 0;

Or. fr

Amendment 1575

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(bc) the constellation is governed jointly with a public entity, in accordance with paragraph 0.

Or. fr

Amendment 1576

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Union space operator shall ensure that the satellites that are part of the constellation comply with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, and declare that the conditions laid down in the first subparagraph are fulfilled.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1577

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Union space operator shall ensure that the satellites that are part of the constellation comply with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, and declare that the conditions laid down in the first subparagraph are fulfilled.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1578

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Union space operator shall ensure that the satellites that are part of the constellation comply with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, and declare that the conditions laid down in the first subparagraph are fulfilled.The Union space operator shall ensure that all the satellites that are part of the constellation comply with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, and declare that the conditions laid down in the first subparagraph are fulfilled.

Or. fr

Amendment 1579

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Union space operator shall ensure that the satellites that are part of the constellation comply with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, and declare that the conditions laid down in the first subparagraph are fulfilled.The Union space operator shall ensure that all satellites work together for a common space mission, are subject to a predefined orbital deployment plan andcomply with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V.

Or. en

Amendment 1580

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. If, following the receipt of an application in accordance with paragraph 1, first subparagraph, the assessment of the competent authority carried out in respect to a single satellite to be launched under the respective space mission, demonstrates compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, the competent authority shall issue an authorisation for the entire satellite constellation (‘single authorisation’).deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1581

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. If, following the receipt of an application in accordance with paragraph 1, first subparagraph, the assessment of the competent authority carried out in respect to a single satellite to be launched under the respective space mission, demonstrates compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, the competent authority shall issue an authorisation for the entire satellite constellation (‘single authorisation’).2. If, following the receipt of an application in accordance with paragraph 1, first subparagraph, the assessment of the competent authority, demonstrates compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, it shall issue an authorisation for the entire satellite constellation (‘EUSA single authorisation’).

Or. en

Amendment 1582

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. If, following the receipt of an application in accordance with paragraph 1, first subparagraph, the assessment of the competent authority carried out in respect to a single satellite to be launched under the respective space mission, demonstrates compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I to V, the competent authority shall issue an authorisation for the entire satellite constellation (‘single authorisation’).2. Where a Union space operator intends to carry out a space mission, that entails the launch of a satellite constellation, competent authorities and qualified technical bodies shall assess a single satellite to be launched under the relevant space mission. When the criteria laid down in Article 7 are fulfilled, the competent authority shall issue a single authorisation for the entire satellite constellation, pursuant to Article 6 and Article 7(6).

Or. en

Amendment 1583

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Union space operators shall notify the relevant competent authority of any change in the parameters of a satellite that may affect its compliance with Title IV, as well as before launching a new generation of satellites. Upon receiving such a notification, the competent authorities shall review the single authorisation and, if satisfied that the Article 7(2) criteria are still fulfilled, shall confirm the validity of the single authorisation.

Or. en

Amendment 1584

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Competent authorities may, from the date of the delivery of the single authorisation carry out random inspections on any of those satellites part of the constellation which have not been subject to the ex-ante check upon which the single authorisation was based.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1585

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Competent authorities may, from the date of the delivery of the single authorisation carry out random inspections on any of those satellites part of the constellation which have not been subject to the ex-ante check upon which the single authorisation was based.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1586

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Competent authorities may, from the date of the delivery of the single authorisation carry out random inspections on any of those satellites part of the constellation which have not been subject to the ex-ante check upon which the single authorisation was based.3. Competent authorities may, from the date of the delivery of the single authorisation carry out random inspections on any of those satellites part of the constellation.

Or. en

Amendment 1587

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The competent authority shall withdraw the single authorisation when the results of the random inspections establish non-compliance of the satellite with the authorisation requirements.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1588

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The competent authority shall withdraw the single authorisation when the results of the random inspections establish non-compliance of the satellite with the authorisation requirements.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1589

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The competent authority shall withdraw the single authorisation when the results of the random inspections establish non-compliance of the satellite with the authorisation requirements.4. The competent authority shall withdraw the single authorisation when the results of the random inspections establish non-compliance of the satellite with the authorisation requirements, and shall impose a penalty.

Or. en

Amendment 1590

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The competent authority shall withdraw the single authorisation when the results of the random inspections establish non-compliance of the satellite with the authorisation requirements.4. The competent authority shall withdraw the single authorisation when the results of the random inspections establish non-compliance of the satellite with the authorisation requirements and may impose a penalty.

Or. en

Amendment 1591

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where the random inspections referred to in paragraph 3, identify aspects that conflict with the declaration referred to in paragraph 1, second subparagraph, without however amounting to non-compliance, and the assessment of the competent authority, taking into consideration the explanations provided by the Union space operator, find no major risks for the respective space mission, the competent authority may impose a penalty.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1592

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where the random inspections referred to in paragraph 3, identify aspects that conflict with the declaration referred to in paragraph 1, second subparagraph, without however amounting to non-compliance, and the assessment of the competent authority, taking into consideration the explanations provided by the Union space operator, find no major risks for the respective space mission, the competent authority may impose a penalty.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1593

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where the random inspections referred to in paragraph 3, identify aspects that conflict with the declaration referred to in paragraph 1, second subparagraph, without however amounting to non-compliance, and the assessment of the competent authority, taking into consideration the explanations provided by the Union space operator, find no major risks for the respective space mission, the competent authority may impose a penalty.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1594

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. Where the random inspections referred to in paragraph 3, identify aspects that conflict with the declaration referred to in paragraph 1, second subparagraph, without however amounting to non-compliance, and the assessment of the competent authority, taking into consideration the explanations provided by the Union space operator, find no major risks for the respective space mission, the competent authority may impose a penalty.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1595

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Competent authorities shall review authorisations for the launch of satellite constellations when launching the first batch of the new generation of satellites.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1596

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 6

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Competent authorities shall review authorisations for the launch of satellite constellations when launching the first batch of the new generation of satellites.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1597

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 10deleted
Light regimes
1. The conditions for authorisation referred to in Article 6(1) shall be adapted for the Union space operators referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, as provided for in these paragraphs.
2. Space operators that are research or education institutions or that carry out research space missions shall comply with the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 2, as set out in Article 62.
3. Entities applying a simplified risk management shall comply, as regards Title IV, Chapter II, with the provisions of Article 79(1), first subparagraph, only in relation to critical assets and critical functions.
4. When space operators that are small-sized enterprises or are research or education institutions carry out In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) space missions, they shall be exempted, in relation to Title IV, Chapter III, from the obligation referred to in Article 96(2).

Or. fr

Amendment 1598

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Light regimesLight regimes for safety and environmental sustaibility

Or. en

Amendment 1599

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Light regimesLight regime

Or. en

Amendment 1600

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The conditions for authorisation referred to in Article 6(1) shall be adapted for the Union space operators referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, as provided for in these paragraphs.1. Member States may establish in cooperation with the Commission simplified authorisation processes for Union space operators that are small and medium-sized enterprises, mid-cap enterprises, research or education institutions and space operators carrying out In-Orbit Demonstration Validation (IOD/IOV) or ISOS space missions.

Or. en

Amendment 1601

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The conditions for authorisation referred to in Article 6(1) shall be adapted for the Union space operators referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, as provided for in these paragraphs.1. The conditions for authorisation referred to in Article 6(1) shall be adapted to create light regimes for the Union space operators referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3, as provided for in these paragraphs.

Or. en

Amendment 1602

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The conditions for authorisation referred to in Article 6(1) shall be adapted for the Union space operators referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, as provided for in these paragraphs.1. The conditions for authorisation referred to in Article 6(1) shall be adapted for the Union space operators referred to in paragraph 2 of this article.

Or. en

Amendment 1603

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. Member States may establish simplified authorisation processes for Union space operators that are small and medium-sized enterprises, small mid-caps, research or education institutions, space operators carrying out In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) or ISOS space missions.

Or. en

Amendment 1604

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. Space operators that are research or education institutions or that are small and medium-sized enterprises or mid-cap enterprises that carry out space missions shall be supported by the Commission to successfully implement the obligations imposed by this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 1605

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 b. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt an implementing act in accordance with Article 114(2) and shall develop a methodology to determine the risk profile and specific categories of space activities and potential adaptations to be made under the conditions for authorisations in support of space operators that are research or education institutions or that are small and medium-sized enterprises, or mid-cap enterprises that carry out IOD/IOV or ISOS space missions.

Or. en

Amendment 1606

Angelika Winzig

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Space operators that are research or education institutions or that carry out research space missions shall comply with the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 2, as set out in Article 62.2. Space operators that are research or education institutions or that carry out research space missions shall comply with the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 2, as set out in Article 62 if those space activities present a low overall risk to space safety, sustainability and the orbital environment due to low mission complexity, small satellite size, short orbital lifetimes.

Or. en

Justification

The light regime should not be based solely on the type of operator but also on the risk profile of the activity. Imposing disproportionate requirements on such activities would risk stifling bottom-up innovation, which is why a more risk-based approach is needed.

Amendment 1607

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Space operators that are research or education institutions or that carry out research space missions shall comply with the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 2, as set out in Article 62.2. Space operators that are research or education institutions and that carry out research space missions, or private entities that carry out research or In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) space missions shall comply with the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 2, as set out in Article 62.

Or. en

Amendment 1608

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Space operators that are research or education institutions or that carry out research space missions shall comply with the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 2, as set out in Article 62.2. Space operators that are research or education institutions when carrying out a research or education space mission shall comply with the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 2, as set out in Article 62.

Or. en

Amendment 1609

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Space operators that are research or education institutions or that carry out research space missions shall comply with the requirements of Title IV, Chapter I, Section 2, as set out in Article 62.2. Space operators that are research or education institutions and that carry out research space missions shall comply with the requirements on safety as set out in Article 62.

Or. en

Amendment 1610

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Space operators that are research or education institutions may apply the simplified risk management. Competent authorities shall submit to the Agency the list on entities applying a simplified risk management.

Or. en

Justification

From Article 5 (28) and Article 79 (2)

Amendment 1611

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The Competent Authority or the Agency, where appropriate, shall assess and approve the application of a light regime.

Or. en

Amendment 1612

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 b. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, develop an appropriate methodology to determine the applicability of a light regime to space operators, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(2) while ensuring adequate consultation of relevant stakeholders, and take into account existing international guidelines, best practices, and standards.

Or. en

Amendment 1613

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 2 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 c. The Agency shall keep a publicly available registry of all space operators that qualify for a light regime under this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 1614

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Entities applying a simplified risk management shall comply, as regards Title IV, Chapter II, with the provisions of Article 79(1), first subparagraph, only in relation to critical assets and critical functions.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1615

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Entities applying a simplified risk management shall comply, as regards Title IV, Chapter II, with the provisions of Article 79(1), first subparagraph, only in relation to critical assets and critical functions.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1616

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Entities applying a simplified risk management shall comply, as regards Title IV, Chapter II, with the provisions of Article 79(1), first subparagraph, only in relation to critical assets and critical functions.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1617

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Entities applying a simplified risk management shall comply, as regards Title IV, Chapter II, with the provisions of Article 79(1), first subparagraph, only in relation to critical assets and critical functions.3. Entities applying a simplified risk management shall apply the measures laid out in point 9, of Annex VII, only in relations to critical assets and critical functions, needed to address the risks of:
a) loss of control of assets with propulsion;
b) loss of control of assets with capacity to emit interferences susceptible to adversely impact the security of other space operations.

Or. en

Justification

From Article 79 (1)

Amendment 1618

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. When space operators that are small-sized enterprises or are research or education institutions carry out In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) space missions, they shall be exempted, in relation to Title IV, Chapter III, from the obligation referred to in Article 96(2).deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1619

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. When space operators that are small-sized enterprises or are research or education institutions carry out In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) space missions, they shall be exempted, in relation to Title IV, Chapter III, from the obligation referred to in Article 96(2).4. When space operators that are small and medium-sized enterprises, mid-cap enterprises, research or education institutions and space operators carrying out In-Orbit Demonstration Validation (IOD/IOV) or ISOS space missions, they shall be temporary excluded from the requirments of Title IV, Chapter III, in accordance with in Article 96(2).

Or. en

Amendment 1620

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. When space operators that are small-sized enterprises or are research or education institutions carry out In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) space missions, they shall be exempted, in relation to Title IV, Chapter III, from the obligation referred to in Article 96(2).4. When space operators are small mid-caps, small and medium-sized enterprises or are research or education institutions, that carry out In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) or ISOS space missions, they shall be excluded from the requirements of Title IV, Chapter III, in accordance with Article 96.

Or. en

Amendment 1621

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. When space operators that are small-sized enterprises or are research or education institutions carry out In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) space missions, they shall be exempted, in relation to Title IV, Chapter III, from the obligation referred to in Article 96(2).4. When space operators carry out In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV) space missions, they shall be exempted from the obligation to calculate the Environmental Footprint of the space activities they carry out, referred to in Article 96(2).

Or. en

Amendment 1622

Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Simplified and accelerated authorisation procedure shall apply for suborbital flights, technology demonstration missions, In-Orbit Demonstration and Validation (IOD/IOV), and other experimental activities. Such procedure shall include proportionate requirements regarding safety assessments, environmental obligations and documentation.

Or. en

Amendment 1623

Sarah Knafo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Small-sized enterprises and research or education institutions shall benefit automatically from the simplified regime set out in this Article without additional eligibility formalities.

Or. en

Amendment 1624

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Title II – Chapter II

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
II [...]deleted

Or. en

Justification

Chapter II (equivalent recognition of national authorisations) is deleted because it is entirely superseded by the single EUSA authorisation under the revised Article 6. There is no longer a system of 27 national authorisations requiring mutual recognition; one EU authorisation replaces all of them.

Amendment 1625

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where space activities are carried out in relation to the Union-owned assets, the Commission shall authorise the entity entrusted with the execution or operation of the respective component of the Union Programme.Where space activities are carried out in relation to the Union-owned assets, the Commission shall authorise the entity entrusted with the sole execution or operation of the respective component of the Union Programme.

Or. en

Amendment 1626

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Depending on the specific governance of the component of the Union Programme, the applicant entity shall provide to the Agency and the Commission all technical details and explanations that demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I, II, III, IV and V.2. Depending on the specific governance of the Union action, the applicant entity shall provide to the Agency and the Commission all technical details and explanations that demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I, II, III, IV and V.

Or. en

Amendment 1627

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Depending on the specific governance of the component of the Union Programme, the applicant entity shall provide to the Agency and the Commission all technical details and explanations that demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I, II, III, IV and V.2. Depending on the specific component of the Union Programme, the applicant entity shall provide to the Agency and the Commission all technical details and explanations that demonstrate compliance with the requirements laid down in Title IV, Chapters I, II, III, IV and V.

Or. en

Amendment 1628

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Within 30 working days of receipt of the entity’s application for authorisation, the Agency shall assess whether the application is complete.Within 20 working days of receipt of the entity’s application for authorisation, the Agency shall assess whether the application is complete.

Or. en

Amendment 1629

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where an application for authorisation is not complete, or where further clarification is needed, the Agency shall set a deadline by which the applicant entity shall provide any additional information as needed or bring clarification.Where an application for authorisation is not complete, or where further clarification is needed, the Agency shall set a deadline by which the applicant entity shall provide any additional information as needed.

Or. en

Amendment 1630

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where an application for authorisation is not complete, or where further clarification is needed, the Agency shall set a deadline by which the applicant entity shall provide any additional information as needed or bring clarification.Where an application for authorisation is not complete, or where further clarification is needed, the Agency shall set a reasonable deadline by which the applicant entity shall provide any additional information.

Or. en

Amendment 1631

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
There shall be no need for an authorisation from the Member States in which the applicant is located.

Or. en

Amendment 1632

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Within 6 months from the date of the notification referred to in Article 11(3), third subparagraph, the Agency shall examine, pursuant to Article 43(1), point (a), the application for authorisation, by assessing whether the applicant:Within 6 months from the date of the notification referred to in Article 11(3), third subparagraph, the Agency shall examine, pursuant to Article 43(1), point (a), the application for authorisation, by assessing whether the applicant ensures compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation:

Or. en

Amendment 1633

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Within 6 months from the date of the notification referred to in Article 11(3), third subparagraph, the Agency shall examine, pursuant to Article 43(1), point (a), the application for authorisation, by assessing whether the applicant:Within 3 months from the date of the notification referred to in Article 11(3), third subparagraph, the Agency shall examine, pursuant to Article 43(1), point (a), the application for authorisation, by assessing whether the applicant ensures compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 1634

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) possesses all the necessary reliability, capability and expertise to carry out space activities;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1635

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) possesses all the necessary reliability, capability and expertise to carry out space activities;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1636

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) ensures compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and as applicable with any specific requirements needed by the implementation of the space mission, in the context of the Space Programme referred to in Regulation (EU) 2021/696 or Regulation (EU) 2023/588, for which an application for authorisation is submitted;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1637

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) ensures compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and as applicable with any specific requirements needed by the implementation of the space mission, in the context of the Space Programme referred to in Regulation (EU) 2021/696 or Regulation (EU) 2023/588, for which an application for authorisation is submitted;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1638

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) does not pose a threat to the public order, the safety of persons and property and to public health in the Union.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1639

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) does not pose a threat to the public order, the safety of persons and property and to public health in the Union.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1640

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) does not pose a threat to the public order, the safety of persons and property and to public health in the Union.(c) does not pose a threat to the public order, the safety of persons and property and to public health in the Union, and its strategic interests.

Or. en

Amendment 1641

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Agency shall adopt a fully reasoned decision proposing to the Commission to issue or refuse an authorisation, based on the technical assessment to assess compliance carried out in accordance with Article 43(1), point (a).The Agency shall adopt a fully reasoned decision proposing to the Commission to issue or refuse an authorisation, based on the technical assessment and notify the Commission immediately.

Or. en

Amendment 1642

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Agency shall adopt a fully reasoned decision proposing to the Commission to issue or refuse an authorisation, based on the technical assessment to assess compliance carried out in accordance with Article 43(1), point (a).The Agency shall adopt a fully reasoned decision proposing to the Commission to issue or refuse an authorisation, based on the technical assessment carried out in accordance with Article 43(1), point (a).

Or. en

Amendment 1643

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Tomáš Kubín

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Agency shall notify its decision to the Commission immediately.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1644

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Within 30 working days of receipt of the decision of the Agency referred to in paragraph 1, second subparagraph, the Commission shall take a decision to issue or refuse the authorisation and shall notify it to the applicant immediately. The decision shall take effect upon its notification to the applicant.Within 20 working days of receipt of the decision of the Agency referred to in paragraph 1, second subparagraph, the Commission shall take a decision to issue or refuse the authorisation and shall notify it to the applicant immediately. The decision shall take effect upon its notification to the applicant. The Commission shall inform the Agency immediately and register the operator in URSA.

Or. en

Amendment 1645

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Commission shall issue an authorisation only where the applicant meets the requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1646

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Commission shall issue an authorisation only where the applicant meets the requirements referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1647

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The Agency shall register without delay in URSO the Union space operators authorised in accordance with this Chapter.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1648

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The Agency shall register without delay in URSO the Union space operators authorised in accordance with this Chapter.3. The Agency shall register without delay in URSA the space activities carried out by Union space operators authorised in accordance with this Chapter.

Or. en

Amendment 1649

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The Agency shall register without delay in URSO the Union space operators authorised in accordance with this Chapter.3. The Agency shall immediately register in URSO the Union space operators authorised in accordance with this Chapter.

Or. en

Amendment 1650

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Agency shall propose to the Commission to suspend or withdraw, as applicable, the authorisation where a Union space operator of Union-owned assets:2. The Agency shall propose to the Commission to suspend or withdraw, as applicable, the authorisation where a Union space operator of Union-owned assets no longer complies with the conditions under which the authorisation was issued, and has not taken the remedial action requested by the Commission.

Or. en

Amendment 1651

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Agency shall propose to the Commission to suspend or withdraw, as applicable, the authorisation where a Union space operator of Union-owned assets:2. The Agency shall propose to the Commission to suspend or withdraw, as applicable, the authorisation where a Union space operator of Union-owned assets no longer complies with the conditions under which the authorisation was issued and has not taken the remedial actions requested by the Commission.

Or. en

Amendment 1652

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) has obtained the authorisation by making false statements or through other irregular means;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1653

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point a

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) has obtained the authorisation by making false statements or through other irregular means;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1654

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) no longer complies with the conditions under which the authorisation was issued and has not taken the remedial actions requested by the Commission.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1655

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) no longer complies with the conditions under which the authorisation was issued and has not taken the remedial actions requested by the Commission.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1656

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Not later than 2 months from the receipt of the proposal of the Agency referred to in paragraph 2, first subparagraph, the Commission shall take a decision on the proposed suspension or withdrawal.Within 30 working days from the receipt of the proposal of the Agency referred to in paragraph 2, first subparagraph, the Commission shall take a decision on the proposed suspension or withdrawal.

Or. en

Amendment 1657

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Provision of spaced-based data and space services by third country space operators and international organisationsProvision of space-based data and space services on the internal market

Or. en

Justification

Reflects the principle of equal application to all operators providing services in the Union regardless of origin.

Amendment 1658

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Provision of spaced-based data and space services by third country space operators and international organisationsProvision of space-based data and space services by third country space operators and international organisations

Or. en

Amendment 1659

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph -1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
-1. Where space operators place space-based data or space services on the internal market, the relevant space activities shall be registered in URSA and shall carry the e-certificate referred to in Article 25.

Or. en

Amendment 1660

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph -1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
-1 a. Primary providers of space-based data shall provide space-based data in the Union only where such data have been generated by space activities registered in URSA and carry the e-certificate.

Or. en

Amendment 1661

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Third country space operators that are registered in accordance with Article 17 in the Union Register of Space Objects and are in possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1), shall be allowed to provide space services to Union space operators and in relation to Union-owned assets and to assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21).1. Where space operators place space-based data or space services on the internal market of the Union, the relevant space activities shall be registered in URSA and shall carry the e-certificate referred to in Article 25. This requirement shall apply regardless of whether the space operator is established in the Union or in a third country.
Primary providers of space-based data shall provide space-based data in the Union only where such data have been generated by space activities registered in URSA and carrying the e-certificate referred to in Article 25.

Or. en

Justification

Replacing the fragmented Commission approach — separate regimes for third-country operators — with a single, transparent URSA registration requirement for all operators placing services on the EU market. Equal rules for all: Union operators hold EUSA authorisations, non-Union operators obtain URSA registrations.

Amendment 1662

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Third country space operators that are registered in accordance with Article 17 in the Union Register of Space Objects and are in possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1), shall be allowed to provide space services to Union space operators and in relation to Union-owned assets and to assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21).1. A third country space operator may only provide a space service to Union space operators if the space activities it intends to provide for that service are registered in URSA in accordance with Article 17.

Or. en

Amendment 1663

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Third country space operators that are registered in accordance with Article 17 in the Union Register of Space Objects and are in possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1), shall be allowed to provide space services to Union space operators and in relation to Union-owned assets and to assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21).1. Third country space operators that are registered in accordance with Article 17 in the Union Register of Space Objects shall be allowed to provide space services to Union space operators and in relation to Union-owned assets and to governmental and non-governmental space assets.

Or. en

Amendment 1664

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Third country space operators that are registered in accordance with Article 17 in the Union Register of Space Objects and are in possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1), shall be allowed to provide space services to Union space operators and in relation to Union-owned assets and to assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21).1. Third country space operators shall be allowed to provide space services to Union space operators, provided that the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) They are registered in accordance with Article 17 in the Union Register of Space Objects; and
(b) They are in possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1).

Or. en

Amendment 1665

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Third country space operators that are registered in accordance with Article 17 in the Union Register of Space Objects and are in possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1), shall be allowed to provide space services to Union space operators and in relation to Union-owned assets and to assets referred to in Article 5, first paragraph, point (21).1. Third country space operators that carry out space activities that are registered in accordance with Article 17 in URSA and are in possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1), shall be allowed to provide space services to Union space operators and in relation to Union-owned assets and to governmental or non-governmental space assets .

Or. en

Amendment 1666

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. A space operator from a third country may only provide a space service in the Union where the space activities necessary for that service are registered in URSA in accordance with Article 17 and carry the e-certificate referred to in Article 25.

Or. en

Justification

Explicit market access rule for third-country operators: no space service in the Union without URSA registration and e-certificate.

Amendment 1667

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. Third country launch operators and third country launch site operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the launch operators and launch site operators laid down in Articles 61, 75, 75a, and 95 to 101.

Or. en

Amendment 1668

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 b. Third country collision avoidance space services providers shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union collision avoidance space services providers laid down in Articles 102 and 103.

Or. en

Amendment 1669

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
For international organisations to provide, by virtue of their treaties, space-based data or space services in the Union, as applicable, the agreements referred to in Articles 107 and 108, respectively, shall be in place.deleted

Or. en

Justification

Moved to article 20 a new

Amendment 1670

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
For international organisations to provide, by virtue of their treaties, space-based data or space services in the Union, as applicable, the agreements referred to in Articles 107 and 108, respectively, shall be in place.For international organisations to provide, by virtue of their treaties, space-based data or space services in the Union, as applicable, the agreements referred to in Articles 107 and 108, respectively, shall be in place.
The space activities of international organisations providing space-based data or space services in the Union, pursuant to the first subparagraph, shall be registered to URSA and shall carry the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1).

Or. en

Amendment 1671

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
For international organisations to provide, by virtue of their treaties, space-based data or space services in the Union, as applicable, the agreements referred to in Articles 107 and 108, respectively, shall be in place.International organisations shall be allowed to provide, by virtue of their treaties, space-based data or space services in the Union, as long as:
(a) the agreement referred to in Article 107 is in place;
(b) they are registered in accordance with Article 17 in the Union Register of Space Objects; and
(c) they are in possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1).

Or. en

Amendment 1672

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
International organisations providing space-based data or space services in the Union, pursuant to the first subparagraph, shall be registered to URSO and in the possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1).deleted

Or. en

Justification

Moved to article 20 a new

Amendment 1673

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
International organisations providing space-based data or space services in the Union, pursuant to the first subparagraph, shall be registered to URSO and in the possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1).deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1674

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
International organisations providing space-based data or space services in the Union, pursuant to the first subparagraph, shall be registered to URSO and in the possession of the e-certificate referred to in Article 25(1).deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1675

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 3

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an international organisation only carries out technical assessment activities pursuant to Article 8(1), point (b).deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1676

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an international organisation only carries out technical assessment activities pursuant to Article 8(1), point (b).deleted

Or. en

Justification

The carve-out for international organisations carrying out only technical assessment activities is no longer needed: under the revised architecture, ESA's role as qualified technical body is governed by Article 8 and the Article 108 agreement, not by Article 14.

Amendment 1677

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an international organisation only carries out technical assessment activities pursuant to Article 8(1), point (b).deleted

Or. en

Justification

Moved to article 20 a new

Amendment 1678

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an international organisation only carries out technical assessment activities pursuant to Article 8(1), point (b).3. Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an international organisation only carries out technical assessment activities pursuant to Article 8(1), point (c).

Or. en

Amendment 1679

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an international organisation only carries out technical assessment activities pursuant to Article 8(1), point (b).3. Paragraph 5 shall not apply where an international organisation only carries out technical assessment activities pursuant to Article 8(1), point (b).

Or. en

Amendment 1680

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 15deleted
Rules applicable to third country space operators
1.
Third country spacecraft operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union spacecraft operators laid down in Articles 62, 66, 67, 69 to 73, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.
In addition, third country spacecraft operators shall:
(a) subscribe to a public or commercial collision avoidance space services provider;
(b) ensure that the collision avoidance space services provider referred to in point (a), has the technical means to assess the collision avoidance and complies with the requirements laid down in point 1, of Annex IV;
(c) notify to the Agency, in the application for registration in URSO, the name and details of the collision avoidance space services provider referred to in point (a).
The Agency shall add the information referred to in point (c), in the Union contact list database referred to in Article 67(1).
2. Third country launch operators and third country launch site operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union launch operators and launch site operators laid down in Articles 61, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.
3. Third country ISOS providers shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union ISOS providers laid down in Article 101.
4. Third country collision avoidance space services providers shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union collision avoidance space services providers laid down in Articles 102 and 103.

Or. en

Amendment 1681

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Rules applicable to third country space operatorsRules applicable to space operators from a third country

Or. en

Amendment 1682

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Third country spacecraft operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union spacecraft operators laid down in Articles 62, 66, 67, 69 to 73, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.Third country spacecraft operators when offering space services or space-based data to the Union market shall either:
(a) be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union spacecraft operators laid down in Articles 62, 63, 66, 67, 69 to 73, and 96 to 100 or
(b) demonstrate, in an application to the Agency in accordance with Article 17, that the extant processes the operator has in place meet the safety, resilience, and sustainability requirements of this Act.

Or. en

Amendment 1683

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Third country spacecraft operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union spacecraft operators laid down in Articles 62, 66, 67, 69 to 73, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.The activities of third country spacecraft operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union spacecraft operators laid down in Articles 62, 63, 66, 67, 69 to 73, and 96 to 100, when they are provided as space services and space-based data in the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 1684

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Third country spacecraft operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union spacecraft operators laid down in Articles 62, 66, 67, 69 to 73, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.Space activities carried out by third country spacecraft operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union spacecraft operators laid down in Articles 7a, 62, 63, 66, 67, 69 to 73, 75, and 96 to 100.

Or. en

Amendment 1685

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Third country spacecraft operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union spacecraft operators laid down in Articles 62, 66, 67, 69 to 73, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.Third country space operators seeking to operate in Union territory shall be subject to all of the requirements applicable to Union space operators.

Or. fr

Amendment 1686

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) subscribe to a public or commercial collision avoidance space services provider;(a) develop in-house collision avoidance systems compliant with the requirements in Annex IV or subscribe to a public or commercial collision avoidance space services provider certified by the Agency;

Or. en

Amendment 1687

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) subscribe to a public or commercial collision avoidance space services provider;(a) subscribe to a public or commercial collision avoidance space services provider to ensure effective collision avoidance mechanisms;

Or. en

Amendment 1688

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) subscribe to a public or commercial collision avoidance space services provider;(a) subscribe, without fail, to the Union collision avoidance space services provider;

Or. fr

Amendment 1689

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) notify to the Agency, in the application for registration in URSO, the name and details of the collision avoidance space services provider referred to in point (a).(c) notify to the Agency, in the application for registration of their space activities in URSA, the name of the CA provider and information on the technical means referred to in point (a).

Or. en

Amendment 1690

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) notify to the Agency, in the application for registration in URSO, the name and details of the collision avoidance space services provider referred to in point (a).(c) notify to the Agency, in the application for registration in URSA, the name and details of the collision avoidance space services provider referred to in point (a).

Or. en

Amendment 1691

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Agency shall add the information referred to in point (c), in the Union contact list database referred to in Article 67(1).deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1692

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Third country launch operators and third country launch site operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union launch operators and launch site operators laid down in Articles 61, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.2. Third country launch operators and third country launch site operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to Union launch operators and launch site operators.

Or. fr

Amendment 1693

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Third country launch operators and third country launch site operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union launch operators and launch site operators laid down in Articles 61, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.2. Third country launch operators and third country launch site operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union launch operators and launch site operators laid down in Articles 61, 75 and 96 to 100.

Or. en

Amendment 1694

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Third country launch operators and third country launch site operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union launch operators and launch site operators laid down in Articles 61, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.2. Third country launch services shall, for each type of launch vehicle, and not per launch, be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union launch services laid down in Articles 61, and 96 to 100.

Or. en

Amendment 1695

András Gyürk, Julie Rechagneux, Mélanie Disdier, Jorge Martín Frías, András László, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Barbara Bonte

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 2

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Third country launch operators and third country launch site operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union launch operators and launch site operators laid down in Articles 61, 75 to 92, and 96 to 100.2. Third country launch operators and third country launch site operators shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union launch operators and launch site operators laid down in Articles 61 and 96 to 100.

Or. en

Amendment 1696

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Third country ISOS providers shall be subject to the requirements applicable to the Union ISOS providers laid down in Article 101.3. Third country ISOS providers shall be subject to the requirements applicable to Union ISOS providers.

Or. fr

Amendment 1697

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Third country space operators that are established in a third country for which the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision, in accordance with Article 105, shall be deemed to comply with the requirements laid down in this Article when they are in possession of a national authorisation for the space activities they offer as space services or use to provide space-based data in the Union.

Or. en

Amendment 1698

Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 16deleted
Rules for third country space operators from equivalent jurisdictions ​​​​​
Third country space operators that are established in a third country for which the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision, in accordance with Article 105, shall be presumed to comply with the requirements laid down in Article 15.

Or. fr

Amendment 1699

Sergey Lagodinsky

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 16deleted
Rules for third country space operators from equivalent jurisdictions ​​​​​
Third country space operators that are established in a third country for which the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision, in accordance with Article 105, shall be presumed to comply with the requirements laid down in Article 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1700

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 16deleted
Rules for third country space operators from equivalent jurisdictions ​​​​​
Third country space operators that are established in a third country for which the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision, in accordance with Article 105, shall be presumed to comply with the requirements laid down in Article 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1701

Christophe Grudler, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Martin Hojsík, Sigrid Friis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Third country space operators that are established in a third country for which the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision, in accordance with Article 105, shall be presumed to comply with the requirements laid down in Article 15.deleted

Or. en

Justification

The presumption of compliance for operators from equivalence decision countries is deleted, consistent with the deletion of the equivalence decisions mechanism in Article 105. All operators are subject to the same technical assessment regardless of origin, removing a distortion that advantaged operators from countries granted equivalence.

Amendment 1702

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Third country space operators that are established in a third country for which the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision, in accordance with Article 105, shall be presumed to comply with the requirements laid down in Article 15.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1703

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Third country space operators that are established in a third country for which the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision, in accordance with Article 105, shall be presumed to comply with the requirements laid down in Article 15.Third country space operators that are established in a third country for which the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision, in accordance with Article 105, shall be presumed to comply with the requirements laid down in Article 15 for the duration of that decision, where applicable.

Or. en

Amendment 1704

Giorgio Gori, Sofie Eriksson

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Agency shall register in URSA the space activities of such third country space operators if they are authorised in that third country and are subject to ongoing supervision in that third country.

Or. en

Amendment 1705

Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Aura Salla, Inese Vaidere, Wouter Beke, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jan Farský, Marion Walsmann, Oliver Schenk, Susana Solís Pérez, Massimiliano Salini, François-Xavier Bellamy

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Registration for third country space services providersRegistration for third country space operators

Or. en