opinion parliamentary committee, 3 June 2025

On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2015/1017, (EU) 2021/523, (EU) 2021/695 and (EU) 2021/1153 as regards increasing the efficiency of the EU guarantee under Regulation (EU) 2021/523 and simplifying reporting requirements

Document ITRE-AD-773384 · (COM(2025)0084 – C100036/2025 – 2025/0040(COD))

Committee on Industry, Research and Energy · Rapporteur: Niels Flemming Hansen

Where the law stands · dossier 2025/0040 →

AI:In short

The committee opinion amends the InvestEU regulation to improve access to finance for SMEs, reduce reporting burdens for small operations, and align the programme with EU strategic priorities. It introduces a flexible SME definition allowing solemn declarations on ownership, raises the reporting exemption threshold to EUR 300,000, and ensures continuity of approvals beyond 2025.

Position. The committee proposes amendments to the Commission proposal, focusing on SME access to finance, simplification, and alignment with strategic priorities.

Key points

The SME definition is adjusted for this legislation: enterprises may use a solemn declaration on ownership structure to meet eligibility criteria, with safeguards against larger entities capturing funds.
Reporting requirements for financing or investment operations not exceeding EUR 300,000 are exempted, except for specified indicators, to reduce administrative burden.
The amendments aim to address EU investment needs in innovation, green and digital transitions, and defence, supporting strategic autonomy and competitiveness.
The opinion stresses that simplification measures should not compromise data quality or monitoring, and should be carefully designed to benefit micro, small, and social enterprises.
The final evaluation should assess the effectiveness of the derogations, including their impact on SMEs, and consider regulatory adjustments from a future small mid-cap category.

Who is affected

Small and medium-sized enterprises, including start-ups and scale-ups, benefit from easier access to finance and reduced reporting burdens.
Financial intermediaries and implementing partners face lower administrative requirements for small operations.

Figures and deadlines

EUR 300,000: threshold for exempting reporting on key performance indicators.
EUR 750-800 billion per year by 2030: additional investment needs in Europe.

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Jump to an amendment (9)

Amendment 1
Amendment 2
Amendment 3
Amendment 4
Amendment 5
Amendment 6
Amendment 7
Amendment 8
Amendment 9

Short justification 46 paragraphs

The core amendments to the InvestEU omnibus regulation are designed to enhance the programme's effectiveness and align it to current economic and strategic priorities.

Primarily, the revisions aim to improve access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). A key change is the introduction of a more flexible SME definition, which, under specific conditions, allows enterprises to use a solemn declaration regarding their ownership structure to meet the eligibility criteria. The overarching goal is to simplify procedures and reduce administrative burdens, thereby enabling SMEs, including start-ups and scale-ups, to access capital more efficiently.

Secondly, significant emphasis is placed on reducing bureaucracy and streamlining administrative processes. Reporting requirements, particularly for smaller-scale financing and investment operations (not exceeding EUR 300,000), will be substantially alleviated. This measure is intended to ease the administrative load on final recipients, financial intermediaries, and implementing partners, whilst ensuring that the overall quality of data collection and the capacity for effective programme monitoring and evaluation are maintained.

Finally, the amendments address the European Union's considerable investment needs and evolving strategic priorities. Acknowledging the substantial funding demands in areas such as innovation, the green and digital transitions, and defence, these adjustments are intended to ensure that InvestEU can continue to effectively mobilise necessary private and public capital. This will reinforce the programme's capacity to support the EU's strategic objectives, including the pursuit of greater strategic autonomy and competitiveness within a changing geopolitical context. Furthermore, these changes aim to ensure the continuity of approvals of new operations beyond 2025, responding to significant market demand for the programme.

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy submits the following to the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible:

Amendment 1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
Text proposed by the Commission(1) The Union faces massive financing needs to deliver on its objectives in the areas of innovation, the clean and digital transition, and social investment and skills, while a complex backdrop affecting the Union’s competitiveness and industrial base characterised by changing global dynamics, slow economic growth, accelerated climate change and environmental degradation, technological competition and rising geopolitical tensions needs to be addressed.	Amendment(1) The Union faces massive financing needs to deliver on its objectives in the areas of innovation, the clean and digital transition, defence, social investment, and skills. At the same time, a complex backdrop characterised by shifting global dynamics, slow economic growth, accelerated climate change and environmental degradation, technological competition, and rising geopolitical tensions all poses challenges to the Union’s competitiveness and industrial base. This underlines the need for addressing the difficulties small and medium-sized enterprises including start-ups and scale-ups face in accessing capital.

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(1) The Union faces massive financing needs to deliver on its objectives in the areas of innovation, the clean and digital transition, and social investment and skills, while a complex backdrop affecting the Union’s competitiveness and industrial base characterised by changing global dynamics, slow economic growth, accelerated climate change and environmental degradation, technological competition and rising geopolitical tensions needs to be addressed.

(1) The Union faces massive financing needs to deliver on its objectives in the areas of innovation, the clean and digital transition, defence, social investment, and skills. At the same time, a complex backdrop characterised by shifting global dynamics, slow economic growth, accelerated climate change and environmental degradation, technological competition, and rising geopolitical tensions all poses challenges to the Union’s competitiveness and industrial base. This underlines the need for addressing the difficulties small and medium-sized enterprises including start-ups and scale-ups face in accessing capital.

Amendment 2

Proposal for a regulation

Read the rest (34 paragraphs)

Recital 2

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
Text proposed by the Commission(2) The Draghi report assesses the combined additional investment needs in Europe at EUR 750-800 billion per year by 2030. This includes a substantial amount for the green and digital transition. Ensuring sufficient public and private investment is critical to boost productivity growth and achieve Union’s goals, leverage private investments with the objective to decarbonise industry, accelerate the production, storage and deployment of clean energy and electrification, strengthen interconnections and grids, advance sustainable and circular business models, foster building renovation, develop clean tech manufacturing as well as digital technologies and their diffusion across economic sectors.	Amendment(2) The Draghi report assesses the combined additional investment needs in Europe at EUR 750-800 billion per year by 2030. This includes a substantial amount for the green and digital transition. Ensuring sufficient public and private investment is critical to boosting productivity growth, enhancing energy and digital independence, and supporting all effective clean solutions, without favouring specific technologies, towards achieving the Union’s goals. These investment should leverage private funding to decarbonise industry, accelerate the production, storage and deployment of clean energy and electrification, strengthen interconnections and grids, advance sustainable and circular business models, foster energy efficient building renovation and increase the availability of affordable housing, develop clean tech manufacturing as well as digital technologies and their diffusion across economic sectors. In this context, and considering the evolving geopolitical landscape and increased security concerns, enhancing the Union’s autonomy is essential to safeguard economic and political stability.

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(2) The Draghi report assesses the combined additional investment needs in Europe at EUR 750-800 billion per year by 2030. This includes a substantial amount for the green and digital transition. Ensuring sufficient public and private investment is critical to boosting productivity growth, enhancing energy and digital independence, and supporting all effective clean solutions, without favouring specific technologies, towards achieving the Union’s goals. These investment should leverage private funding to decarbonise industry, accelerate the production, storage and deployment of clean energy and electrification, strengthen interconnections and grids, advance sustainable and circular business models, foster energy efficient building renovation and increase the availability of affordable housing, develop clean tech manufacturing as well as digital technologies and their diffusion across economic sectors. In this context, and considering the evolving geopolitical landscape and increased security concerns, enhancing the Union’s autonomy is essential to safeguard economic and political stability.

Amendment 3

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
Text proposed by the Commission(3) The InvestEU Fund is the main EU-level tool to leverage public and private funding to support a broad range of Union policy priorities. Through its comprehensive network of implementing partners, including the European Investment Bank (EIB), the European Investment Fund (EIF), other international financial institutions and national promotional banks and institutions, the InvestEU Fund is delivering much-needed financing through its risk-sharing capacity. The InvestEU interim evaluation highlighted that budgetary guarantees are inherently efficient for the EU budget and confirmed that the programme is well on track to mobilise investment, with a notable expected impact on the real economy. However, approvals of financing and investment operation under InvestEU were heavily frontloaded, and as a result, if no action is taken to address the issue, new approvals for some financial products may cease after 2025.	Amendment(3) The InvestEU Fund is the main EU-level tool to leverage public and private funding to support a broad range of Union policy priorities. Through its comprehensive network of implementing partners, including the European Investment Bank (EIB), the European Investment Fund (EIF), other international financial institutions and national promotional banks and institutions, the InvestEU Fund is delivering much-needed financing through its risk-sharing capacity. The InvestEU interim evaluation highlighted that budgetary guarantees are inherently efficient for the EU budget and confirmed that the programme is well on track to mobilise investment, with a notable expected impact on the real economy. However, approvals of financing and investment operation under InvestEU were heavily frontloaded, and as a result, if no action is taken to address the issue, new approvals for some financial products may cease after 2025. This performance reflects significant market demand. While simplification efforts are welcomed and desirable, they should be carefully designed and justified, with a view to ensuring that they effectively reduce administrative burdens and enhance accessibility for all enterprises, in particular micro, small, and social enterprises.

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(3) The InvestEU Fund is the main EU-level tool to leverage public and private funding to support a broad range of Union policy priorities. Through its comprehensive network of implementing partners, including the European Investment Bank (EIB), the European Investment Fund (EIF), other international financial institutions and national promotional banks and institutions, the InvestEU Fund is delivering much-needed financing through its risk-sharing capacity. The InvestEU interim evaluation highlighted that budgetary guarantees are inherently efficient for the EU budget and confirmed that the programme is well on track to mobilise investment, with a notable expected impact on the real economy. However, approvals of financing and investment operation under InvestEU were heavily frontloaded, and as a result, if no action is taken to address the issue, new approvals for some financial products may cease after 2025.

Amendment 4

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
Text proposed by the Commission(7) In line with an overall objective of simplification so as to alleviate the administrative burden for final recipients, financial intermediaries and implementing partners, reporting requirements, including those relating to key performance and monitoring indicators, should be reduced, where appropriate, in particular those that affect small businesses and small-size operations. The application of the definition of an SME should be adjusted to remove complexities to the extent possible. Specific attention should be paid to social economy enterprises and micro finance institutions.	Amendment(7) In line with an overall objective of simplification and the need to alleviate excessive compliance costs for final recipients, financial intermediaries and implementing partners, reporting requirements, including those relating to certain key performance and monitoring indicators, should be reduced, where appropriate, in particular those that affect small businesses and small-size operations. The application of the definition of an SME should be temporarily adjusted for the sole purpose of this legislation to remove unnecessary complexities, introducing greater flexibility in demonstrating SME status while maintaining legal certainty. In this regard, and as noted in Recital 14 of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, enterprises should be permitted to use solemn declarations to certify specific characteristics relevant to SME status, such as the autonomy for its ownership structure. For enterprises already recognised as SMEs, particularly start-ups, under Union or national law, procedures should be straightforward, while ensuring bigger entities do not capture the available funds for SMEs. Efforts to streamline the application process and accelerate disbursement of funds can meaningfully improve the capacity of such enterprises to scale up, innovate, and seize market opportunities, while ensuring that the programme delivers effectively on its objectives. Special consideration should be given to the specific needs of social economy enterprises and microfinance institutions, including the application of proportionate and appropriate due diligence procedures.

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(7) In line with an overall objective of simplification so as to alleviate the administrative burden for final recipients, financial intermediaries and implementing partners, reporting requirements, including those relating to key performance and monitoring indicators, should be reduced, where appropriate, in particular those that affect small businesses and small-size operations. The application of the definition of an SME should be adjusted to remove complexities to the extent possible. Specific attention should be paid to social economy enterprises and micro finance institutions.

(7) In line with an overall objective of simplification and the need to alleviate excessive compliance costs for final recipients, financial intermediaries and implementing partners, reporting requirements, including those relating to certain key performance and monitoring indicators, should be reduced, where appropriate, in particular those that affect small businesses and small-size operations. The application of the definition of an SME should be temporarily adjusted for the sole purpose of this legislation to remove unnecessary complexities, introducing greater flexibility in demonstrating SME status while maintaining legal certainty. In this regard, and as noted in Recital 14 of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, enterprises should be permitted to use solemn declarations to certify specific characteristics relevant to SME status, such as the autonomy for its ownership structure. For enterprises already recognised as SMEs, particularly start-ups, under Union or national law, procedures should be straightforward, while ensuring bigger entities do not capture the available funds for SMEs. Efforts to streamline the application process and accelerate disbursement of funds can meaningfully improve the capacity of such enterprises to scale up, innovate, and seize market opportunities, while ensuring that the programme delivers effectively on its objectives. Special consideration should be given to the specific needs of social economy enterprises and microfinance institutions, including the application of proportionate and appropriate due diligence procedures.

Amendment 5

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment(11a) Simplification measures introduced by this Regulation, including the derogations set out in Article 2, point 21, and Article 28, paragraph 2 of Regulation (EU) 2021/523, shall be without prejudice to the negotiations on the post-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework. These measures shall not compromise the quality of data collected from final recipients nor the capacity to effectively monitor and evaluate the Programme’s performance, in particular its contribution to the Union’s climate, energy, and social objectives.

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(11a) Simplification measures introduced by this Regulation, including the derogations set out in Article 2, point 21, and Article 28, paragraph 2 of Regulation (EU) 2021/523, shall be without prejudice to the negotiations on the post-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework. These measures shall not compromise the quality of data collected from final recipients nor the capacity to effectively monitor and evaluate the Programme’s performance, in particular its contribution to the Union’s climate, energy, and social objectives.

Amendment 6

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment(11b) The final evaluation report under this Regulation should include a thorough assessment of the effectiveness and impact of these derogations, with specific attention to their role in facilitating access to finance for target groups such as SMEs, while upholding the principles of transparency, accountability, and robust performance monitoring that underpin the Programme. This assessment should also enable the European Parliament to fulfil its institutional role in overseeing the use of Union funds and ensuring their alignment with agreed policy objectives.

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(11b) The final evaluation report under this Regulation should include a thorough assessment of the effectiveness and impact of these derogations, with specific attention to their role in facilitating access to finance for target groups such as SMEs, while upholding the principles of transparency, accountability, and robust performance monitoring that underpin the Programme. This assessment should also enable the European Parliament to fulfil its institutional role in overseeing the use of Union funds and ensuring their alignment with agreed policy objectives.

Amendment 7

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment(11c) With a view to reducing administrative complexity and legal uncertainty, the evaluation should also take into account any regulatory adjustments arising from the projected legislative proposal on a small mid-cap enterprise category. Due attention should be given to the effectiveness of measures aimed at facilitating enterprise development.

Amendment 8

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e

Regulation (EU) 2021/523

Article 2 – point 21

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
Text proposed by the Commission(21) ‘small and medium-sized enterprise’ (‘SME’) means (a) in case of financial products not conferring advantage in State aid terms, an enterprise which, according to its last annual or consolidated accounts, employs an average number of employees during the financial year of less than 250, or (b) in case of other types of financial products, a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise within the meaning of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC7 or as otherwise defined in the guarantee agreement;;	Amendment(21) ‘small and medium-sized enterprise’ (‘SME’) means, for the purpose of this legislation, (a) an enterprise which, according to its last annual or consolidated accounts, employs an average number of employees during the financial year of less than 250, and an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million, and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million and where information relating to the autonomy of its ownership structure for the purpose of calculating those thresholds may be made by way of a solemn-declaration by the enterprise or (b) in case of financial products where the applicable State aid rules require the use of the SME definition in Annex I to the Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise within the meaning of that Annex I;
Text proposed by the Commission7 Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).	Amendment7 Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(21) ‘small and medium-sized enterprise’ (‘SME’) means (a) in case of financial products not conferring advantage in State aid terms, an enterprise which, according to its last annual or consolidated accounts, employs an average number of employees during the financial year of less than 250, or (b) in case of other types of financial products, a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise within the meaning of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC7 or as otherwise defined in the guarantee agreement;;

(21) ‘small and medium-sized enterprise’ (‘SME’) means, for the purpose of this legislation, (a) an enterprise which, according to its last annual or consolidated accounts, employs an average number of employees during the financial year of less than 250, and an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million, and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million and where information relating to the autonomy of its ownership structure for the purpose of calculating those thresholds may be made by way of a solemn-declaration by the enterprise or (b) in case of financial products where the applicable State aid rules require the use of the SME definition in Annex I to the Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise within the meaning of that Annex I;

7 Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).

Amendment 9

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a

Regulation (EU) 2021/523

Article 28 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionImplementing partners shall be exempt from reporting on key performance and monitoring indicators laid down in Annex III, except those in points 1, 2, 5.2, 6.3 and 7.2, as far as financing or investments operations benefiting final recipients receiving financing or investment supported by the EU guarantee or by the InvestEU financial instrument from an implementing partner or a financial intermediary not exceeding EUR 100 000 are concerned.;	AmendmentBy way of derogation from the previous subparagraph of this paragraph and only until the end of the programming period, implementing partners shall be exempted from reporting on key performance and monitoring indicators laid down in Annex III, except those in points 1, 2, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 4.1, 5.2, 6.3 and 7.2, as far as financing or investments operations benefiting final recipients receiving financing or investment supported by the EU guarantee or by the InvestEU financial instrument from an implementing partner or a financial intermediary not exceeding EUR 300 000 are concerned.

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Implementing partners shall be exempt from reporting on key performance and monitoring indicators laid down in Annex III, except those in points 1, 2, 5.2, 6.3 and 7.2, as far as financing or investments operations benefiting final recipients receiving financing or investment supported by the EU guarantee or by the InvestEU financial instrument from an implementing partner or a financial intermediary not exceeding EUR 100 000 are concerned.;

By way of derogation from the previous subparagraph of this paragraph and only until the end of the programming period, implementing partners shall be exempted from reporting on key performance and monitoring indicators laid down in Annex III, except those in points 1, 2, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 4.1, 5.2, 6.3 and 7.2, as far as financing or investments operations benefiting final recipients receiving financing or investment supported by the EU guarantee or by the InvestEU financial instrument from an implementing partner or a financial intermediary not exceeding EUR 300 000 are concerned.

Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur for opinion has received input 3 paragraphs

Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur for the opinion received input from the following entities or persons in the preparation of the opinion, prior to the adoption thereof in committee:

Entity and/or person

European Comission

European Investment Bank

European Investment Fund

SME United

Bussiness Europe

Danish Chamber of Commerce

Climate Strategy and Partners

Confederation of Danish Industry

Finance Denmark

European Association of Guarantee Institutions (AECM)

Danish Permanent Representation

Danish Ministry for Business

Eurochambres

EuroCommerce

The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur for the opinion.

Procedure pages

How the committees handled the text, and how their members voted on it.

Procedure – committee asked for opinion 1 paragraph

Title	Amending Regulations (EU) 2015/1017, (EU) 2021/523, (EU) 2021/695 and (EU) 2021/1153 as regards increasing the efficiency of the EU guarantee under Regulation (EU) 2021/523 and simplifying reporting requirements
References	COM(2025)0084 – C10-0036/2025 – 2025/0040(COD)
Committee(s) responsible	BUDG	ECON
Opinion by Date announced in plenary	ITRE 3.4.2025
Rapporteur for the opinion Date appointed	Niels Flemming Hansen 7.4.2025
Rule 59 – Joint committee procedure Date announced in plenary	3.4.2025
Simplified procedure - date of decision	9.4.2025
Discussed in committee	13.5.2025
Date adopted	3.6.2025
Result of final vote	+: –: 0:	62 13 4
Members present for the final vote	Wouter Beke, Tom Berendsen, Michael Bloss, Paolo Borchia, Markus Buchheit, Borys Budka, João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Elena Donazzan, Matthias Ecke, Christian Ehler, Sofie Eriksson, Jan Farský, Niels Fuglsang, Lina Gálvez, Alexandra Geese, Jens Geier, Bruno Gonçalves, Nicolás González Casares, Christophe Grudler, Niels Flemming Hansen, Eero Heinäluoma, Ivars Ijabs, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Fernand Kartheiser, Seán Kelly, Sarah Knafo, Ondřej Knotek, Michał Kobosko, Eszter Lakos, Morten Løkkegaard, Marina Mesure, Dan Nica, Angelika Niebler, Ville Niinistö, Aleksandar Nikolic, Mirosława Nykiel, Daniel Obajtek, Nikos Pappas, Tsvetelina Penkova, Pascale Piera, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Jüri Ratas, Julie Rechagneux, Aura Salla, Elena Sancho Murillo, Jussi Saramo, Paulius Saudargas, Benedetta Scuderi, Diego Solier, Anna Stürgkh, Beata Szydło, Dario Tamburrano, Bruno Tobback, Isabella Tovaglieri, Filip Turek, Kris Van Dijck, Yvan Verougstraete, Mariateresa Vivaldini, Andrea Wechsler, Angelika Winzig, Auke Zijlstra
Substitutes present for the final vote	Mohammed Chahim, Annalisa Corrado, Mélanie Disdier, Michalis Hadjipantela, Katri Kulmuni, Dario Nardella, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Massimiliano Salini, Susana Solís Pérez, Irene Tinagli, Francesco Torselli, Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, Jörgen Warborn, Iuliu Winkler
Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final vote	Anja Arndt, Pär Holmgren, Irena Joveva

Final vote by roll call by the committee asked for opinion 3 paragraphs

62 · For

ECR: Elena Donazzan, Fernand Kartheiser, Daniel Obajtek, Diego Solier, Beata Szydło, Francesco Torselli, Kris Van Dijck, Mariateresa Vivaldini
EPP: Wouter Beke, Tom Berendsen, Borys Budka, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Christian Ehler, Jan Farský, Michalis Hadjipantela, Niels Flemming Hansen, Seán Kelly, Eszter Lakos, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Angelika Niebler, Mirosława Nykiel, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Jüri Ratas, Massimiliano Salini, Aura Salla, Paulius Saudargas, Susana Solís Pérez, Jörgen Warborn, Andrea Wechsler, Iuliu Winkler, Angelika Winzig
Renew: João Cotrim De Figueiredo, Christophe Grudler, Ivars Ijabs, Irena Joveva, Michał Kobosko, Katri Kulmuni, Morten Løkkegaard, Anna Stürgkh, Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, Yvan Verougstraete
S&D: Mohammed Chahim, Annalisa Corrado, Matthias Ecke, Sofie Eriksson, Niels Fuglsang, Lina Gálvez, Jens Geier, Bruno Gonçalves, Nicolás González Casares, Eero Heinäluoma, Dario Nardella, Dan Nica, Tsvetelina Penkova, Elena Sancho Murillo, Irene Tinagli, Bruno Tobback
Greens: Michael Bloss, Alexandra Geese, Pär Holmgren, Ville Niinistö, Benedetta Scuderi

13 · Against

ESN: Anja Arndt, Markus Buchheit, Sarah Knafo
No group: Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă
Patriots: Paolo Borchia, Mélanie Disdier, Aleksandar Nikolic, Pascale Piera, Julie Rechagneux, Isabella Tovaglieri, Filip Turek, Auke Zijlstra
The Left: Marina Mesure

4 · Abstained

Patriots: Ondřej Knotek
The Left: Nikos Pappas, Jussi Saramo, Dario Tamburrano

On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2015/1017, (EU) 2021/523, (EU) 2021/695 and (EU) 2021/1153 as regards increasing the efficiency of the EU guarantee under Regulation (EU) 2021/523 and simplifying reporting requirements

AIAI:In short

Key points

Who is affected

Figures and deadlines

Full text

Amendment 1

Amendment 2

Amendment 3

Amendment 4

Amendment 5

Amendment 6

Amendment 7

Amendment 8

Amendment 9

Procedure pages

AI:In short