On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869

In the current geopolitical context and following recent energy market disruptions, the rapporteur considers that the Union must strengthen its energy system to ensure security of supply, resilience and affordability, while remaining on track towards climate neutrality by 2050. The rapporteur underlines that achieving these objectives requires a well-functioning, fully integrated energy market supported by robust and forward-looking infrastructure planning covering electricity, renewable and low-carbon gases, hydrogen and other clean molecules.

The rapporteur underlines that, despite the challenges arising from the current geopolitical situation, the Union must remain firmly committed to its climate objectives and decarbonisation priorities. These objectives should not be weakened but rather pursued through a more integrated and efficient approach to energy system development. In this context, infrastructure projects should be designed in a complementary and mutually reinforcing manner, ensuring optimal system integration across electricity, gases and other energy carriers. The rapporteur emphasises that the core objective is to enable a coherent and integrated energy system that delivers on climate goals while ensuring cost-efficiency, avoiding unnecessary expenditure and maintaining energy infrastructure as a cornerstone of the Union’s economic stability and resilience.

The rapporteur considers that recent developments have demonstrated the necessity of diversification of energy sources and supply routes. No single technological pathway can address the needs of all Member States. The rapporteur therefore underlines the importance of home-grown energy, including renewable electricity as well as low-carbon solutions such as hydrogen, biomethane and synthetic fuels, where consistent with climate objectives and lifecycle emissions criteria, making use of the Union’s domestic potential, including agricultural resources and waste streams.

The rapporteur further considers that infrastructure planning must reflect the evolving composition of the energy system and increasing demand, including from emerging industrial uses, and should therefore avoid reliance on a single technological approach. In this context, the rapporteur underlines that system needs should be assessed holistically, including the contribution of firm and dispatchable low-carbon generation to system stability, congestion reduction and overall system efficiency.

A central objective of the amendments is to ensure the consistent application of the principle of technological neutrality, in line with Article 194(2) TFEU. The rapporteur considers that all relevant net-zero and low-carbon technologies should be assessed on the basis of their contribution to decarbonisation, security of supply and system stability, while fully respecting Member States’ right to determine their energy mix and ensuring consistency with the Union’s climate and environmental objectives.

The rapporteur also underlines the need to strengthen the resilience of the energy system, including through improved cyber and physical protection of critical infrastructure, as well as to ensure that infrastructure development is aligned with real system needs, avoids unnecessary costs and reduces environmental impact.

Consequently, the rapporteur considers that robust governance is indispensable to ensure that infrastructure planning is environmentally sustainable, credible and implementable. The amendments therefore strengthen the role of technical expertise provided by ENTSO-E, ENTSOG and ENNOH, while ensuring balanced involvement of the Commission, Member States and stakeholders. This approach promotes transparent, science-based and data-driven decision-making, supports environmentally sound investments, minimises unnecessary infrastructure expansion and associated impacts, and reinforces regional cooperation, thereby facilitating cross-border integration and contributing to a secure, resilient and climate-neutral European energy system.

Finally, the rapporteur considers that, in order to ensure the efficient use of existing assets and limit the need for new infrastructure, more emphasis should be put on the repurposing of existing natural gas pipelines for the transport of renewable and low-carbon gases, including hydrogen, where technically and economically feasible. This approach reduces the need for resource-intensive new construction, thereby minimising environmental impacts, land use and ecosystem disruption, while supporting a cost-effective and timely energy transition in line with the Union’s climate objectives.

The Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety submits the following to the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible:

Amendment 1

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1

Or. en

Justification

The Union industry to be competitive not only needs affordable energy but also clean and preferably home-grown.

Amendment 2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Or. en

Justification

Article 194(2) TFEU stipulates that each Member State has the right to determine the conditions for exploiting its energy resources, its choice between different energy sources, and the general structure of its energy supply. This is why technological neutrality in achieving climate targets is essential.

Amendment 3

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3

Or. en

Justification

Nuclear energy can complement renewable energy sources by providing stable, low-carbon and non-intermittent electricity, thereby supporting grid stability and security of supply.

Amendment 4

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 3 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Climate neutrality without nuclear is technically feasible, but systemically more demanding. Including nuclear energy in the decarbonisation process can reduce the scale of required infrastructure, limit system costs under certain conditions, and enhance resilience particularly in the current geopolitical context marked by energy security risks and supply dependencies.

Amendment 5

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Or. en

Justification

This amendment ensures technological developments are reflected in infrastructure planning where relevant for system stability. Supports renewable integration, reduces system costs and avoids unnecessary infrastructure, while safeguarding technological neutrality and Member States’ energy mix choices, contributing to climate objectives.

Amendment 6

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6

Or. en

Justification

Projects to integrate biomethane infrastructure development - which are already part of the latest PCI and PMI list - need to continue to be supported, as biomethane is a key source of renewable energy that needs to be transported and stored between production and demand centres. Regulation which is in force at the moment defines them as smart gas grid category.

Amendment 7

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Clarifies that cross-border infrastructure supporting net-zero technologies recognised under Union law is eligible for support, ensuring coherence with existing frameworks while addressing coordination gaps beyond national level. Strengthens technological neutrality, security of supply and competitiveness through integrated planning, without affecting Member States’ energy mix choices.

Amendment 8

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7

Or. en

Justification

Recent weeks and months just re-confirmed that European energy system is susceptible to the geopolitical situation this is why we should have the best possible integrated energy infrastructure possible to face the challenges coming together with those threats.

Amendment 9

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

By reinforcing the cyber and physical resilience of critical energy infrastructure, this amendment safeguards the uninterrupted operation of systems essential for renewable energy integration and decarbonisation.

Amendment 10

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Or. en

Justification

Including the principle of technology neutrality ensures climate objectives are achieved in a cost-effective and resilient manner by allowing different low- and zero-emission technologies to contribute. Supports innovation, avoids supply bottlenecks and accelerates decarbonisation while respecting Member States’ energy mix choice.

Amendment 11

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Or. en

Justification

By ensuring that technological developments and evolving policy priorities are systematically reflected in infrastructure planning, this amendment enables a more adaptive and future-proof regulatory framework. It supports the timely integration of innovative low- and zero-emission technologies, avoids lock-in of outdated infrastructure, and accelerates the transition to a climate-neutral and resilient energy system.

Amendment 12

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19

Or. en

Justification

Including the principle of technology neutrality ensures climate objectives are achieved in a cost-effective and resilient manner by allowing different low- and zero-emission technologies to contribute.

Amendment 13

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 33

Or. en

Justification

Amid the energy crisis, reducing reliance on imported fossil fuels is a top energy-security priority, and that nuclear is well placed to help decarbonise electricity supply.

Amendment 14

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 52

Or. en

Justification

ENTSOs and ENNOH should continue to develop the scenarios, based on an equal footing, due to their long-term expertise of network operators. The input by these stakeholders ensures that scenarios not only look at economic and technical feasibility but also at how to decarbonize and integrate renewable energy in the long term. Therefore, the Commission should actively seek their contribution, maintaining the position it currently holds in the planning and coordination configuration.

Amendment 15

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 55 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Ensures that infrastructure planning reflects the full range of system-level solutions, including the role of dispatchable clean generation in reducing congestion and stabilising the system. This approach avoids unnecessary grid expansion, improves cost-efficiency, and supports optimal use of public and private investment while advancing decarbonisation objectives.

Amendment 16

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 58

Or. en

Justification

Commercial road transport is a key sector for achieving the Union’s decarbonisation objectives and is expected to drive significant increases in electricity demand due to electrification. Ensuring its adequate representation in stakeholder consultations is therefore essential to properly reflect infrastructure needs, including grid capacity and charging deployment, in the Union-wide ten-year network development plans.

Amendment 17

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 60

Or. en

Justification

In the current geopolitical situation, achieving the EU’s climate targets and EU energy sovereignty without nuclear energy may turn out extremely difficult. Moreover, nuclear energy, as it is predictable electricity generation, it gives sufficient support for the grid stability.

Amendment 18

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 61

Or. en

Justification

Both electrons and molecules can be derived from renewable sources; neither should be excluded in favour of the other.

Amendment 19

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 64

Or. en

Justification

Both Member States and National Regulatory Authorities (NRA's) are responsible for the proper developed and implemented infrastructure serving principles of decarbonised and secured European system. Decision-making closer to the entities directly involved in projects facilitates more effective input, promotes regional integration and coordination, thereby reducing barriers to cross-border energy flows, which is essential for creating a flexible, resilient, sustainable and decarbonised European energy system.

Amendment 20

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 67 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Now data centers only in the EU account for 2.5–3% of EU electricity consumption. If Europe wants both AI and climate neutrality, it cannot plan networks as if demand were static or flexibility were unlimited. TEN-E should remain technology-neutral and allow Member States that choose nuclear to reflect its system value in infrastructure planning.

Amendment 21

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 69

Or. en

Justification

Ensures a technology-neutral and consistent application of investment incentives by recognising that grid connection infrastructure for nuclear installations entails similar risk profiles to other strategic energy infrastructure projects. Given their capital intensity, long lead times and cross-border relevance, such projects require stable and predictable regulatory frameworks to enable financing. Including them avoids distortions in investment signals and supports security of supply and decarbonisation objectives.

Amendment 22

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 70

Or. en

Justification

Current support frameworks risk overlooking infrastructure that delivers system-wide benefits including faster pace of reaching EU climate goals but faces structural financing barriers. Nuclear-related grid connections are highly capital-intensive and require early and anticipatory investment.

Amendment 23

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 70 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Taking into account current challenges and the European Union’s decarbonisation needs as well as the timely achievement of climate targets, molecules such as hydrogen require initial support, both financial and market-based, at national and European levels. Therefore, they should receive additional support and attention from the European Commission.

Amendment 24

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 75

Or. en

Justification

A technology-neutral approach allows Member States to deploy the most suitable mix of solutions based on their specific conditions, reduces the risk of supply constraints, and supports a more resilient and diversified energy system aligned with long-term climate goals.

Amendment 25

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 76 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Clarifies the application of the principle of technological neutrality in infrastructure planning by ensuring that all relevant net-zero and low-carbon technologies can contribute where they provide system benefits and faster achievement of EU decarbonisation.

Amendment 26

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 79

Or. en

Justification

All TEN-E project categories should be treated on an equal footing to ensure that all enabling technologies can receive appropriate support for achieving EU decarbonisation objectives.

Amendment 27

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Defines infrastructure for renewable and low-carbon energy carriers to ensure consistent interpretation and targeted support. Covers pipelines, networks and related equipment for transport and distribution of hydrogen and low-carbon gases; storage (underground and above-ground); blending, conversion and reconversion facilities, including power-to-gas and gas-to-power; and infrastructure integrating these carriers into electricity, heating, transport and industry.

Amendment 28

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 b (new)

Or. en

Justification

This amendment clarifies the scope of the Regulation by introducing a definition of “clean molecule”, ensuring consistent interpretation and avoiding regulatory gaps between different energy carriers.

Amendment 29

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

The proposed definition is in line with the system needs study as currently performed in the TYNDP and reflects what TSOs, Member States and regulators need to identify where additional infrastructure should be considered.

Amendment 30

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Maintaining support for clean molecules integration infrastructure, including biomethane and sustainable liquid fuels, is essential to ensure continuity of projects already recognised under PCI/PMI and those with future potential. Removing or weakening this category would undermine market certainty, distort investment signals and for example could jeopardise the 35 bcm biomethane target for 2030, while delaying cost-effective decarbonisation.

Amendment 31

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Or. en

Justification

All energy infrastructure categories in the context of permit granting and public participation should be treated in equal manner - so hydrogen infrastructure, electrolyser, natural hydrogen extraction facilities and CO2 projects should have the same overriding public interests as electricity projects - thus enabling greater diversification of development pathways and increasing the overall potential to meet climate and environmental objectives.

Amendment 32

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 1

Or. en

Justification

Involvement of TSOs is essential when developing scenarios for infrastructure planning, given their in-depth knowledge of both the grid and national energy systems. It is key to deploying the assets needed to support the uptake of low-and zero emission energy. Scenarios developed with TSO input can reflect more granular and operationally grounded reality, enabling a more efficient and sustainable use of the existing system. They can also help identify targeted interventions to support system integration, ultimately enhancing both sustainability and environmental outcomes.

Amendment 33

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b

Or. en

Justification

The central scenario should be aligned with EU climate and energy objectives, including the European Climate Law, as well as with Member States’ NECPs, to ensure coherence between Union-level infrastructure planning and national policy frameworks. It should therefore be clarified that the central scenario is based on NECPs as the primary reference, while remaining consistent with Union climate targets, electrification pathways, hydrogen development and security-of-supply requirements.

Amendment 34

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Or. en

Justification

The central scenario should be aligned with national policies to ensure coherence between EU-level infrastructure planning and Member States’ policy frameworks. It is therefore appropriate to clarify in the Regulation that the central scenario is based on National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs).In particular, the scenario should rely on NECPs without modifications to projected electricity, gas and hydrogen volumes. This approach ensures that the scenario provides a robust and credible basis for infrastructure planning and delivers appropriate investment signals.

Amendment 35

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 3

Or. en

Justification

Commission should consult stakeholders before finalising its methodology and ensure transparency in data use. In order to improve response rates, enhance compliance, and increase the accuracy of reported information, while also addressing specialised technical considerations that may otherwise lead stakeholders to provide unintentionally erroneous data or withhold complete responses due to limited understanding, confidentiality or other concerns, thereby supporting more effective delivery of climate, environmental, and sustainability objectives.

Amendment 36

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 4

Or. en

Justification

Improves consistency and robustness of scenarios, reduces risk of suboptimal investments and supports timely deployment of infrastructure for renewables, electrification and hydrogen, contributing to EU climate targets.

Amendment 37

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 5

Or. en

Justification

To bring relevant expertise and clarity to the process, ENTSO-E, ENTSO-G and ENNOH should play a role in preparing the central scenario and in next consultations with the Commission, followed by engagement with the TEN-E Group, including MS. To date, Commission has relied on these stakeholders for high-quality, technically detailed and up-to-date input, which supports methodologies for permitting, sustainability assessments, climate-aligned planning and other key areas. Continuing this approach would enhance credibility, accuracy and transparency of policy development.

Amendment 38

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 6

Or. en

Justification

As the TEN-E group becomes the decision making body - its decision should be binding to adopt the central scenario, which is highly relevant to the climate and environment policy development too and has an impact on how relevant stakeholders relate to its requirements and deliverables.

Amendment 39

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 7

Or. en

Justification

To make process more inclusive and faster achievement of climate neutrality, all parties should play active role in decision-making, as all necessary data is at their disposal, including climate and environmental information. In this context, ENTSO-E/-G and ENNOH are critical: they provide detailed network, operational, scenario data that underpin energy infrastructure planning. Their involvement helps deliver outcomes aligned with current climate and energy scenarios and ensures improvement of data collection, feeding into the refinement of existing and future scenarios

Amendment 40

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8

Or. en

Justification

While the TEN-E Group becomes a decision-making body under this Regulation, delegated acts should not be the primary instrument for such decisions. Given its inclusive nature, bringing together Member States, the Commission and relevant stakeholders, the TEN-E Group should remain the main forum for taking these decisions.

Amendment 41

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Decision-making should not rely on a single scenario. Given the complexity and uncertainty of energy infrastructure planning, doing so risks over- or under-investment. The central scenario should be complemented by additional scenarios or sensitivities, drawing on data and methodologies from ENTSO-E, ENTSO-G and ENNOH, whose robust and up-to-date modelling enhances climate and environmental alignment.

Amendment 42

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 1

Or. en

Justification

Within the TEN-E proposal, repurposing is explicitly defined and specified in the hydrogen infrastructure category. However, there is a notable absence of considering the impact of repurposing and other gas system evolutions on the whole energy system. It is essential that security of supply needs be taken into account.

Amendment 43

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Or. en

Justification

Infrastructure planning should be based on proper identification of the challenges based on in depth assessment done by all there entities for electricity, gas and hydrogen. Infrastructure planning should rely not just on high-level projections, but on a thorough, technically grounded evaluation of the actual energy system and of its function as a whole. By basing planning on a robust system assessment, infrastructure deployment can better support low- and zero-emission energy integration, enhancing environmental and climate outcomes.

Amendment 44

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a

Or. en

Justification

Energy systems are interconnected and interdependent, and infrastructure planning that ignores one sector can lead to imbalances, inefficiencies, or underutilization across the network. The approach integrates electricity, gas, and hydrogen infrastructure planning, ensuring that investments are economically efficient, technically sound, and aligned with long-term climate, environmental, and market objectives.

Amendment 45

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d

Or. en

Justification

The proposal should be inclusive this is why gas should be directly enumerated due to undoubted synergies between all the energy infrastructures allowing proper management of electrons and molecules together.

Amendment 46

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Or. en

Justification

This absence of a complete view of the whole energy system and its security of supply could potentially result in removing or not investing in essential infrastructure. For proper planning, meeting infrastructure development standards, and to address adequacy needs, TEN-E Reg. should include a proper gas infrastructure assessment and monitoring at full energy system level, not just at project levels. This amendment ensures that the potential of repurposing existing gas infrastructure is systematically assessed in the context of the transition to renewable and low-carbon gases.

Amendment 47

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Or. en

Justification

The system assessment report would provide a comprehensive, data-driven analysis of future infrastructure needs, based on accurate and up-to-date information. Through stakeholder consultation, ENTSO-E, ENTSOG and ENNOH can reflect market, regulatory and environmental perspectives, ensuring alignment with environmental objectives, renewable integration and cross-border flows, and supporting more informed decision-making.

Amendment 48

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 – paragraph 4

Or. en

Justification

Repurposing existing infrastructure has the potential to significantly impact the energy system's carbon footprint and its ability to integrate renewable energy sources. However, the absence of a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of repurposing and other gas system evolutions means missing an opportunity to fully assess how these changes could contribute to emissions reductions and support environmental sustainability. It is essential that security of supply is taken into account.

Amendment 49

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 1

Or. en

Justification

Historically, TEN-E Reg. Groups focused on projects derived from the TYNDP and on infrastructure needs identified by TSOs. This ensured a technical foundation and alignment with system-level requirements. Broad geographical scope of some RG in the EC proposal creates a risk that projects which do not reflect the needs of all MS may be promoted. AM strengthens regional identification of infrastructure gaps, enabling precise planning. Avoids unnecessary infrastructure, reduces environmental impacts and accelerates integration of renewable energy, supporting climate objectives.

Amendment 50

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 2

Or. en

Justification

Calls for projects should be launched by TEN-E Reg. Groups, which define needs and are closest to national and regional planning; This structure better aligns infrastructure development with EU energy, climate and environmental objectives, enhancing system integration, efficiency and sustainability. A 1-y timeframe is more realistic given required studies and TYNDP cycles. Efficient cross-border infrastructure accelerates decarbonisation, strengthens energy security, optimises resource use and avoids unnecessary environmental impacts.

Amendment 51

Proposal for a regulation

Article 13 – paragraph 3

Or. en

Justification

To ensure equal treatment of projects and coherent grid planning, projects under Article 13 should follow the same procedures and rules as other projects. This includes their inclusion in National Dev. Plans and the TYNDP, and application of identical selection criteria. This provision ensures that any new projects proposed, whether by third parties or traditional system operators, should be based on same high standards, leading to well-planned, integrated, and sustainable energy infrastructure that supports the EU's energy transition and environmental objectives.

Amendment 52

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Or. en

Justification

The Gas and Hydrogen Package designates TSOs for hydrogen, and this Regulation establishes a separate category for hydrogen. Therefore, they should have equal rights in the project selection process.

Amendment 53

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Or. en

Justification

Ensures participation of Member States affected through interconnected infrastructure, enabling more accurate cost allocation and coordinated planning. Supports efficient renewable integration, avoids duplicative investments and reduces environmental impacts, contributing to EU climate objectives.

Amendment 54

Proposal for a regulation

Article 17 – paragraph 12

Or. en

Justification

Taking into account the renewable nature of hydrogen production, the inclusion of HTNOs is essential to ensure the coherence and consistency of the Regulation.

Amendment 55

Proposal for a regulation

Chapter VII – title

Or. en

Justification

Effective de-risking mechanism at EU level is crucial to unlock financing for cross-border infrastructure, making investments more attractive and supporting energy transition. By addressing risks that would otherwise delay or deter investment, such mechanism enhances market integration and contributes to achieving EU’s climate and energy goals. This is especially important for cross-border infrastructure, which plays a key role in integrating renewable energy, improving system resilience, and ensuring energy security.

Amendment 56

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point b

Or. en

Justification

De-risking means reducing, sharing, or reallocating risks so private capital will invest on better terms. De-risking in hydrogen finance as reallocating, sharing, or reducing investment risks, which lowers financing costs, and the Commission has also used the term for measures that reduce private-investment risk in energy infrastructure and clean industry.

Amendment 57

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Or. en

Justification

This proposal introduces an EU-level guarantee mechanism as an effective de-risking tool to unlock financing for dedicated cross-border infrastructure. Such a guarantee could take the form of payments backed at EU level, enabling Hydrogen Transmission Network Operators (HTNOs) to bridge the gap between allowed and actual revenues, while ensuring that network tariffs remain affordable. This would strengthen investor confidence and support timely infrastructure deployment which would accelerate the EU decarbonization process.

Amendment 58

Proposal for a regulation

Article 30 – paragraph - 1 (new)

Regulation (EU) 2024/1789

Article 32 – paragraph 1 - point c a (new)

Or. en

(32024R1789)

Justification

Where TSOs decide to repurpose gas infrastructure for hydrogen, cross-border impacts on neighbouring countries must be assessed. This should extend beyond directly connected Member States to include third countries affected along relevant corridors. Such repurposing may have system-wide implications for security of supply, market functioning and network stability, and should therefore be evaluated to ensure consistency with the Union’s climate and environmental objectives.

Amendment 59

Proposal for a regulation

Annex II –– point 1 – point g

Or. en

Justification

Strengthening resilience at infrastructure level is essential for the secure and reliable operation of the energy system and for safeguarding investments supporting the Union’s energy and climate objectives.

Amendment 60

Proposal for a regulation

Annex II –– point 4a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Projects supporting the development and integration of biomethane infrastructure - already recognised through their inclusion in the latest PCI and PMI lists - must continue to benefit from EU support. Biomethane is a strategic, home-grown renewable energy source that directly contributes to the EU’s objectives of energy independence, system resilience, security of supply and industrial competitiveness. Ensuring adequate infrastructure to transport and store biomethane between production sites and demand centres across borders is essential to fully unlock this potential.

Amendment 61

Proposal for a regulation

Annex III – point 2 – point 2

Or. en

Justification

It facilitates continued support and monitoring of essential infrastructure projects, even when they are at different stages. It broadens eligibility for projects on the EU list, making the criteria more inclusive while still ensuring that projects are genuinely progressing. It provides flexibility and reduces risk of excluding valuable projects contributing to the EU’s energy transition goals, like renewable energy grids, interconnections, and carbon capture projects. These projects are vital to meeting long-term climate and sustainability objectives.

Amendment 62

Proposal for a regulation

Annex IV – point 2 – point b

Or. en

Justification

In order to bring more clarification new point 2, point ca is tabled.

Amendment 63

Proposal for a regulation

Annex IV – point 2 – point c a (new)

Or. en

Justification

Decarbonising sectors that are difficult to electrify (heavy industry, transport, heating etc.) requires projects that involve collaboration between TSOs and DSOs from multiple MS. This collaboration helps, for example, integrate clean molecules into energy mix, reducing emissions and advancing the EU’s climate neutrality goals. Additionally, involving third countries fosters multilateral participation, regional cooperation, and risk-sharing. Overall, this approach ensures strong coordination among various grid operators, which is essential for interoperability.

Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur for opinion declares that she included in her draft opinion input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that she received, in the preparation of the draft opinion, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:

The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur for opinion.

Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur for opinion declares that she has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.