Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

opinion parliamentary committee draft, 22 April 2025

On the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026

Document ECON-PA-773052 · (2025/XXXX(BUD))

Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs · Rapporteur: Marlena Maląg

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

AI:In short

This draft opinion addresses the 2026 EU budget, urging it to reflect geopolitical challenges, boost resilience, stimulate arms investment, support fiscal plans, prioritize innovation and cohesion, leverage private investment, aid migration policy, align NGO funding with EU goals, and ensure RRF complementarity.

Position. The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets to incorporate these points into its motion for a resolution.

Key points

  1. Calls for the 2026 budget to reflect challenges from protectionism and the geopolitical context.
  2. Stresses the budget should support making the EU economy more resilient to external shocks.
  3. Emphasizes urgent need to stimulate investment in the arms industry due to military threat.
  4. Calls for the budget to contribute to targets in member states' medium-term fiscal and structural plans.
  5. Stresses cohesion policy is essential for the Single Market; calls for priority to innovation- and cohesion-enhancing investments.
  6. Recalls public investment should drive private investment; significant increase in private capital is necessary for budget effectiveness.
  7. Emphasizes need for budgetary assistance for responsible migration policy supporting the economy under migratory pressures.
  8. Stresses NGO support must align with EU economic objectives and not undermine strategic priorities like energy independence or competitiveness.
  9. Notes 2026 is last year of RRF; stresses complementarity between budget and RRF expenditure and avoiding double financing.

Who is affected

  • EU institutions and member states implementing the 2026 budget.
  • Arms industry, as it calls for stimulating investment in this sector.
  • NGOs receiving EU budget support, which must align with EU economic objectives.

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Opinion 10 paragraphs

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following into its motion for a resolution:

1. Stresses that 2026 will be a difficult year for the Union economy due to the geopolitical context; points to the challenges posed by the return of protectionism; calls for those challenges to be reflected in next year's budget;

2. Notes that the budget should provide adequate support to make the Union economy more resilient to external shocks;

3. In view of the military threat to the Union, emphasises the urgent need to stimulate investment in the arms industry;

4. Calls for the 2026 Union budget to contribute to achieving the targets set in the Member States’ medium-term fiscal and structural plans;

5. Believes that competitiveness and cohesion are inseparable; stresses that cohesion policy is essential for the development of the Single Market; calls for priority to be given to both innovation-enhancing and cohesion-enhancing investments in order to rebuild the Union's competitiveness;

6. Recalls that public investment should be a driver for further private investment; points out that a significant increase in private investment capital is a necessary condition for the Union budget to be effective in stimulating the economy;

7. Emphasises the need for strong budgetary assistance for a responsible migration policy supporting the Union economy in view of the strong migratory pressures;

8. Stresses that Union budget support for NGOs should be consistent with the Union’s economic objectives and must not undermine its strategic priorities, such as energy independence or economic competitiveness;

9. Notes that 2026 is the last year of operation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF); stresses the need for complementarity between expenditure from the budget and the RRF, as well as avoiding double financing.