opinion parliamentary committee, 25 January 2024
On discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022, section III - Commission
Document DEVE-AD-756272 · (2023/2129(DEC))
Committee on Development · Rapporteur: Antoni Comín i Oliveres
AI:In short
The Committee on Development gives its opinion to the Committee on Budgetary Control on the 2022 EU budget discharge, asking it to include its suggestions in its resolution. It raises concerns about the record humanitarian funding gap, the stretched Global Europe instrument (NDICI-GE) and the depletion of its cushion, and calls for Parliament to be notified and involved before the cushion is used. It welcomes the Global Gateway strategy but wants more transparency, assessment and alignment with partner countries' needs and the Sustainable Development Goals. It asks the Commission to speed up spending targets on climate, biodiversity, gender and education, and to improve controls, act on European Court of Auditors recommendations and protect human rights in EU-funded projects.
Position. The Committee on Development asks the Committee on Budgetary Control to incorporate its suggestions into its motion for a resolution on the 2022 discharge, covering concerns on the NDICI-GE cushion, Global Gateway, spending targets, local partners, ODA, human rights and controls.
Key points
- The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control to incorporate its suggestions into its motion for a resolution on the 2022 discharge.
- It is alarmed by the rising number of crises, the highest-ever humanitarian funding gap and growing inequalities, worsened by Russia's aggression in Ukraine, and worried that the NDICI-GE is stretched to its limits.
- It calls on member states to ensure the cushion is mobilised only for purposes within its intended scope.
- It welcomes the Global Gateway strategy and calls for more transparency, accountability and regular assessments, for Parliament's involvement beyond observer status, and for projects to contribute to NDICI-GE development objectives and the SDGs.
- It underlines the need to speed up progress on NDICI-GE spending targets for human development, gender, biodiversity and climate, and calls for concrete actions on how the 30% climate and 10% biodiversity targets for 2026 and 2027 will be met.
- It recalls the commitment to dedicate at least 10% of the EU's development portfolio to quality education and calls on the Commission to continue this and involve local actors.
- It insists the Commission notify Parliament before mobilising the cushion, take its observations into account, and preserve the cushion's purpose of responding to unforeseen crises; it welcomes the proposed Ukraine Facility for 2024-2027.
- It stresses the role of local NGOs and partners, invites the Commission to provide training and improve funding procedures, and to prioritise local organisations.
- It stresses the role of official development assistance, notes the EU and its member states provide approximately 43% of total ODA from OECD donors in 2021, recalls the 93% ODA-compliance obligation, and advocates a cautious approach to blending and public-private partnerships.
- It calls for ex ante assessments of human rights risks in EU programmes, especially tourism, biodiversity, refugee and diaspora projects, and asks the Commission to ensure EU funding is not linked to transnational repression.
- It calls on the Commission and member states to suspend or modulate EU funding programmes that directly or indirectly contribute to human rights violations, particularly regarding Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities.
- It calls on the Commission to improve controls, reduce transactional errors, act on unimplemented ECA recommendations and find eligible projects; it welcomes ECA findings and Special Report 14/2023 and expects the Commission to act on its recommendations.
Who is affected
- The Committee on Budgetary Control, which is asked to incorporate the suggestions into its discharge resolution.
- The Commission, which is asked to improve controls, notify Parliament on the cushion, and act on ECA recommendations.
- Member states, which are called on to ensure the cushion is used only within its intended scope and to suspend or modulate funding linked to human rights violations.
- Local NGOs, small local organisations and partners, which should receive training, better funding access and priority.
- Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, whose rights to self-determination, land, assembly and free, prior and informed consent are highlighted.
Figures and deadlines
- 30% climate target for 2026 and 2027 under the NDICI-GE.
- 10% biodiversity target for 2026 and 2027 under the NDICI-GE.
- approximately 80% of SDG targets undermined by loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services.
- at least 10% of the EU's development portfolio to support access to quality education.
- EUR 501 million mobilised in 2022 from the NDICI-GE cushion for bilateral assistance for Ukraine.
- approximately 43% of total ODA provided by all OECD ODA donors to developing countries in 2021.
- 93% of NDICI-GE funding to be compliant with ODA criteria.
Legal basis. Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (Policy Coherence for Development).
Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 25 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
Full text
Suggestions 13 paragraphs
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution:
1.Is alarmed about the rising number of crises worldwide, the highest-ever humanitarian funding gap and increasing inequalities between and within countries exacerbated by Russia’s unjustified and unprovoked aggression in Ukraine which worsened the global food crisis, triggered an energy, cost of living and debt crisis worldwide and created economic uncertainty; is also concerned about the growing political and economic influence of China in Africa and Russian interference on that continent; is worried that Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument - Global Europe (NDICI-GE) is stretched to its limits and is not sufficient to address existing needs; calls on the Member States to ensure that the cushion is mobilised only for purposes within its intended scope;
2.Welcomes the Global Gateway strategy as a concerted EU response to global challenges; notes that 2022 was the first full year of the implementation of the Global Gateway strategy; underlines that actions bringing together public and private investment must be focused on areas where they can add value to the local economy and be consistent with development objectives and national strategies of partner countries, as well as with the Agenda 2030, the SDGs and the Paris Agreement; calls for more transparency, accountability and regular assessments of the Global Gateway implementation as well as for Parliament’s involvement, beyond a simple observer role, in strategic choices involving Union funds in respect of the scrutiny role of the European Parliament of the NDICI-GE, which is the main source of financing of the Global Gateway; calls on the Commission to ensure that projects branded under the Global Gateway strategy contribute to the development objectives laid down in the NDICI-GE Regulation; insists that Global Gateway should not only align with the EU priorities but also with the needs of partner countries and contribute to the achievement of the SDGs;
3.Underlines the need to speed up progress on achieving the NDICI-GE spending targets for human development, gender, biodiversity and climate objectives; is worried, in particular, about the Commission’ capacity to ensure reaching the Instrument’s climate target of 30% and the biodiversity target of 10% for 2026 and 2027; recalls that the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services will undermine progress in approximately 80 % of the SDGs targets and that climate change will increasingly put pressure on food production and access, especially in vulnerable regions, undermining nutrition and food security; calls for concrete actions outlining how the climate and biodiversity targets are going to be met; recalls the commitment set out to ensure a strong gender perspective and mainstreaming implementing the EU Gender Action Plan III;
4.Reminds the Commission’s commitment to dedicate at least 10% of the EU’s development portfolio to support access to quality education; welcomes the progress reached so far and calls on the Commission to continue the implementation of this commitment; further calls on the Commission to involve local actors with relevant experiences in providing quality education into the implementation of the EU financing for education in developing countries;
5.Is concerned about the depletion of the cushion within the NDICI-GE; insists that the Commission always notifies Parliament before the cushion is mobilised, respecting Parliament’s right of scrutiny and that the Commission fully takes into consideration Parliament's observations on the nature, objectives and financial amounts envisaged; stresses that the Parliament is responsible for democratic oversight and scrutiny of the NDICI-GE instrument as a co-legislator under the co-decision procedure; urges the Commission in its future actions to preserve the initial purpose of cushion funds, which is to respond to unforeseen crises; notes that in 2022 EUR 501 million were mobilised from the cushion of the NDICI-GE instrument as part of the bilateral assistance for Ukraine; welcomes, in this regard, the proposal to create a new instrument, the Ukraine Facility, to provide predictable financial support for Ukraine over the 2024-2027 period;
6.Stresses the role of local NGOs and partners in service delivery and support to local communities; underlines the importance of enhancing their capacity to manage and implement actions financed by the EU and invites the Commission to facilitate adequate training towards this aim; is concerned about the continued difficulties faced by small local organisations to access Union funding; encourages the Commission to improve these funding procedures and to systematically prioritise local organisations in order to provide better capacity-building on the ground; highlights the efficacy of local ownership in project implementation in terms of prioritisation, allocation of resources and building local know-how;
7.Stresses the important role of the official development assistance (ODA); notes that the European Union and its 27 EU Member States together remain the world’s biggest provider of external assistance, accounting for approximately 43% of the total ODA provided by all OECD ODA donors to developing countries in 2021; recalls the obligation under the NDICI-GE Regulation for 93% of the Instrument funding to be compliant with the ODA criteria; stresses that blending and public-private partnerships alone cannot guarantee universal access to, or replace public investments in fields such as education, social protection or health care, that provide crucial long-term prospects for the graduation from poverty and, therefore, advocates for a cautious approach in using them;
8.Calls for ex ante assessments to determine the possible implications and risks of EU programs with regard to human rights, especially in projects dealing with tourism and biodiversity protection, as well as in refugee and diaspora-focused programs;
9.Asks the Commission to guarantee that EU funding programs are not linked to cases of transnational repression, affecting refugees, asylum seekers, and naturalized citizens in the EU;
10.Calls on the Commission and Member States for a suspension or modulation of EU funding programs that (in)directly contribute to human rights violations, with particular regard to the rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs), including their right to self-determination, land, free assembly, and free, prior and informed consent;
11.Highlights the fact that the legitimacy and effectiveness of EU development cooperation hinges on the correct implementation of activities and their proper funding; recognises the work of the Commission in applying controls to make sure that transactions are made in a legitimate manner and that activities are implemented in accordance with the priorities set by the legislator; calls on the Commission to further improve controls in order to decrease the amount of transactional errors, to act upon ECA recommendations that have not been implemented and to redouble efforts to find eligible projects and to ensure a sufficient amount of payments under the current expenditure ceiling; welcomes the finding of the ECA report on the EU budget for 2022 that DG ECHO implemented ECA recommendation and established a procedure ensuring that partner organisations base their allocation of shared costs on expenditure actually incurred;
12.Welcomes the European Court of Auditors (ECA) Special Report 14/2023 entitled ‘Programming the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe: Comprehensive programmes with deficiencies in the methods for allocating funds and impact monitoring’; expects the Commission to act on the recommendations made by the ECA especially as regards more predictable and transparent programming as well as clearer methodology for assessing the impact of EU’s support and reiterates in this regard the recommendations made it its resolution of 12 December 2023 on the implementation of the NDICI-GE; encourages the ECA to prepare special reports relating to development cooperation expenditure and to regularly cover development cooperation aspects in its special reports on horizontal issues in accordance with the Policy Coherence for Development principle set in article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur for the opinion has received input 1 paragraph
The rapporteur declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.
Information on adoption in committee asked for opinion 1 paragraph
| Date adopted | 24.1.2024 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 18 2 1 |
| Members present for the final vote | Alessandra Basso, Hildegard Bentele, Stéphane Bijoux, Dominique Bilde, Mercedes Bresso, Catherine Chabaud, Christophe Clergeau, Antoni Comín i Oliveres, Mónica Silvana González, Pierrette Herzberger-Fofana, György Hölvényi, Rasa Juknevičienė, Beata Kempa, Karsten Lucke, Erik Marquardt, Janina Ochojska, Eleni Stavrou, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Bernhard Zimniok | |
| Substitutes present for the final vote | Carlos Zorrinho | |
| Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote | Riho Terras |
Procedure pages
How the committees handled the text, and how their members voted on it.
Final vote by roll call in committee asked for opinion 3 paragraphs
18 · For
- ECR
- Beata Kempa
- No group
- Antoni Comín i Oliveres
- EPP
- Hildegard Bentele, György Hölvényi, Rasa Juknevičienė, Janina Ochojska, Eleni Stavrou, Riho Terras
- Renew
- Stéphane Bijoux, Catherine Chabaud
- S&D
- Mercedes Bresso, Christophe Clergeau, Mónica Silvana González, Karsten Lucke, Carlos Zorrinho
- The Left
- Miguel Urbán Crespo
- Greens
- Pierrette Herzberger-Fofana, Erik Marquardt
2 · Against
- ID
- Dominique Bilde, Bernhard Zimniok
1 · Abstained
- ID
- Alessandra Basso