Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

opinion parliamentary committee, 25 January 2024

On discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2022

Document DEVE-AD-756271 · (2023/2183(DEC))

Committee on Development · Rapporteur: Antoni Comín i Oliveres

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

AI:In short

The Committee on Development suggests amendments to Parliament's discharge resolution on the 2022 implementation of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds (EDFs). It asks the Committee on Budgetary Control to include these suggestions in its motion for a resolution. It says remaining EDF projects should focus on the Sustainable Development Goals, and calls for support for local partners, stronger coordination between the Commission, the EEAS and EU delegations, and evaluation of projects. It welcomes the Council's allocation of EUR 600 million from de-committed 10th and 11th EDF projects for food security and economic shock in ACP countries, and encourages member states to re-allocate de-committed EDF funds to urgent needs. It notes the Court of Auditors' finding that the EDF accounts for 2022 were handled in accordance with applicable rules, and that the estimated error rate for EDF payments rose from 4.6% to 7.1% between 2021 and 2022. It calls on the Commission to improve controls, reduce transactional errors and fully implement the Court of Auditors' recommendations, especially on excess clearings.

Position. The Committee on Development suggests that the Committee on Budgetary Control incorporate its suggestions into the motion for a resolution on the EDF discharge, focusing on SDG-oriented projects, local partners, coordination, food security funding and improved controls.

Key points

  1. Calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control to incorporate the suggestions into its motion for a resolution on the EDF discharge.
  2. Notes that EDF implementation concerns countries facing climate change, biodiversity loss, food insecurity, the COVID pandemic, Russia's war in Ukraine, debt and crises, and insists remaining projects focus on the Sustainable Development Goals.
  3. Highlights the role of local implementing partners, the need to maintain local know-how as EDF projects phase out for use under NDICI-Global Europe, and the need for evaluation, monitoring and reporting of EU projects.
  4. Calls for stronger coordination between the Commission, the EEAS and EU delegations to cooperate with local actors and identify projects meeting development effectiveness objectives.
  5. Notes that local, non-governmental actors are well placed to deliver EU assistance, especially in remote areas, and that stronger engagement with them could accelerate development cooperation.
  6. Welcomes the Council's allocation of EUR 600 million from de-committed 10th and 11th EDF projects for food security and economic shock in ACP countries after Russia's war in Ukraine.
  7. Encourages member states to re-allocate de-committed EDF funds to urgent ACP needs, and stresses complementing funds with measures for small-scale farmers, agroecological practices, sustainable fisheries and school meals.
  8. Recognises the Commission's work on EDF implementation and notes the Court of Auditors considers the 2022 EDF accounts handled in accordance with applicable rules.
  9. Notes that the ECA and DG INTPA use different methodologies for estimating error rates, that the ECA estimates the error level at 7.1% with about half due to excess clearance, and that the error level grew from 4.6% to 7.1% between 2021 and 2022.
  10. Calls on the Commission to improve controls to reduce transactional errors and fully implement the Court of Auditors' recommendations, particularly to avoid excess clearing errors, and welcomes DG INTPA's review of its control strategy.

Who is affected

  • The Committee on Budgetary Control, which is asked to incorporate the suggestions into its motion for a resolution.
  • The Commission, which is asked to improve controls and implement the Court of Auditors' recommendations.
  • Member states, which are encouraged to re-allocate de-committed EDF funds to urgent ACP needs.
  • Local implementing partners and non-governmental actors, whose role and capacity building are highlighted.
  • ACP countries, which face food security and economic shocks and are the target of the EUR 600 million allocation.

Figures and deadlines

  • EUR 600 million allocated from de-committed 10th and 11th EDF projects for food security and economic shock in ACP countries.
  • 7.1% estimated error level for EDF payment transactions by the Court of Auditors.
  • Error level in transactions grew from 4.6% to 7.1% between 2021 and 2022.

Written by AI from the full text · every figure comes from the text · ¶ opens the paragraph · 25 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

Full text

Suggestions 8 paragraphs

The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution:

1.Notes that the implementation of the European Development Funds (EDFs) concerns countries that are facing aggravating impacts of climate change, biodiversity loss and food insecurity and are weakened by the consequence of the COVID pandemic, Russia’s unjustified and unprovoked war of aggression in Ukraine, as well as rising debt, new and forgotten humanitarian crises and conflicts, generating growing inequality and poverty; insists, therefore, that the remaining projects under the EDFs should focus on advancing the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals; reiterates that security, mutually beneficial partnerships and international cooperation are fundamental conditions for the world to make progress on the SDGs towards 2030 and beyond;

2.Highlights the role of local implementing partners and the need to ensure their support and capacity building; notes that with the phasing out of EDF projects, local know-how on dealing with EU funds should be maintained, with a view to using them for projects under the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) - Global Europe instrument underlines that EU projects should be subject to evaluation, monitoring and reporting in order to determine their effectiveness and avoid unintended negative impacts;

3.Calls for stronger coordination between the Commission, the EEAS and the EU delegations to facilitate discussions and cooperation with relevant local actors on the ground in order to identify the projects that best meet development effectiveness objectives;

4.Notes that local, non-governmental actors are well placed partners to deliver EU assistance for people in need, notably in remote areas; highlights that a strengthened EU engagement with these organisations could accelerate efficiency of development cooperation;

5.Welcomes the Council’s decision which allocated EUR 600 million from de-committed projects under the 10th and 11th EDFs for the purpose of financing actions addressing the food security crisis and economic shock in ACP countries following Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine; encourages the Member States to follow the same approach of re-allocating any de-committed EDF to address the most urgent needs in the ACP countries; stresses that in view of the exceptionally dire food security situation in ACP countries, those funds need to be complemented with appropriate measures to empower small scale farmers as well as support agroeocological practices and sustainable fisheries methods as they enhance local productivity, food security and allow food sovereignty of local communities, making them less dependent on the fluctuations in the global food and agriculture market; stresses that supporting school meals can be a vital tool to address food insecurity;

6.Recognises the work of the Commission in ensuring the correct implementation of the EDF funds, notes that the Court of Auditors considers the EDFs’ accounts for 2022 to have been handled in accordance with applicable rules; notes that the ECA and the European Commission (DG INTPA) employ different methodology when estimating the error rate and that ECA estimates the level of error for EDF payment transactions to be 7.1 % with about half of it due to excess clearance (i.e. when expenditure not incurred is included in the accounts); further notes that the level of error in transactions, estimated by the Court of Auditors, grew from 4,6 % to 7,1 % between 2021 and 2022; underlines that the Commission methodology reflects a corrective capacity after all ex-ante and ex-post controls have been implemented;

7.Highlights the fact that the legitimacy and effectiveness of EU development cooperation hinges on the correct implementation of activities and their proper funding; calls on the Commission to further improve controls in order to decrease the amount of transactional errors and to fully implement the recommendations of the Court of Auditors in particular to avoid errors related to excess clearings; welcomes, in this regard, the DG INTPA declared review of its control strategy and reinforcing EU Delegations’ internal control systems.

Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur for the opinion has received input 1 paragraph

The rapporteur declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

Information on adoption in committee asked for opinion 1 paragraph
Date adopted24.1.2024
Result of final vote+: –: 0:18 2 1
Members present for the final voteAlessandra Basso, Hildegard Bentele, Stéphane Bijoux, Dominique Bilde, Mercedes Bresso, Catherine Chabaud, Christophe Clergeau, Antoni Comín i Oliveres, Mónica Silvana González, Pierrette Herzberger-Fofana, György Hölvényi, Rasa Juknevičienė, Beata Kempa, Karsten Lucke, Erik Marquardt, Janina Ochojska, Eleni Stavrou, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Bernhard Zimniok
Substitutes present for the final voteCarlos Zorrinho
Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final voteRiho Terras

Procedure pages

How the committees handled the text, and how their members voted on it.

Final vote by roll call in committee asked for opinion 3 paragraphs

18 · For

ECR
Beata Kempa
No group
Antoni Comín i Oliveres
EPP
Hildegard Bentele, György Hölvényi, Rasa Juknevičienė, Janina Ochojska, Eleni Stavrou, Riho Terras
Renew
Stéphane Bijoux, Catherine Chabaud
S&D
Mercedes Bresso, Christophe Clergeau, Mónica Silvana González, Karsten Lucke, Carlos Zorrinho
The Left
Miguel Urbán Crespo
Greens
Pierrette Herzberger-Fofana, Erik Marquardt

2 · Against

ID
Dominique Bilde, Bernhard Zimniok

1 · Abstained

ID
Alessandra Basso