amendment list, 23 June 2026
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509
Document CJ71-AM-790104 · (COM(2025)0565 – C100179/2025 – 2025/0240(COD))
Committee on Budgets Committee on Regional Development Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
Full text
Jump to an amendment (278)
- Amendment 4625
- Amendment 4626
- Amendment 4627
- Amendment 4628
- Amendment 4629
- Amendment 4630
- Amendment 4631
- Amendment 4632
- Amendment 4633
- Amendment 4634
- Amendment 4635
- Amendment 4636
- Amendment 4637
- Amendment 4638
- Amendment 4639
- Amendment 4640
- Amendment 4641
- Amendment 4642
- Amendment 4643
- Amendment 4644
- Amendment 4645
- Amendment 4646
- Amendment 4647
- Amendment 4648
- Amendment 4649
- Amendment 4650
- Amendment 4651
- Amendment 4652
- Amendment 4653
- Amendment 4654
- Amendment 4655
- Amendment 4656
- Amendment 4657
- Amendment 4658
- Amendment 4659
- Amendment 4660
- Amendment 4661
- Amendment 4662
- Amendment 4663
- Amendment 4664
- Amendment 4665
- Amendment 4666
- Amendment 4667
- Amendment 4668
- Amendment 4669
- Amendment 4670
- Amendment 4671
- Amendment 4672
- Amendment 4673
- Amendment 4674
- Amendment 4675
- Amendment 4676
- Amendment 4677
- Amendment 4678
- Amendment 4679
- Amendment 4680
- Amendment 4681
- Amendment 4682
- Amendment 4683
- Amendment 4684
- Amendment 4685
- Amendment 4686
- Amendment 4687
- Amendment 4688
- Amendment 4689
- Amendment 4690
- Amendment 4691
- Amendment 4692
- Amendment 4693
- Amendment 4694
- Amendment 4695
- Amendment 4696
- Amendment 4697
- Amendment 4698
- Amendment 4699
- Amendment 4700
- Amendment 4701
- Amendment 4702
- Amendment 4703
- Amendment 4704
- Amendment 4705
- Amendment 4706
- Amendment 4707
- Amendment 4708
- Amendment 4709
- Amendment 4710
- Amendment 4711
- Amendment 4712
- Amendment 4713
- Amendment 4714
- Amendment 4715
- Amendment 4716
- Amendment 4717
- Amendment 4718
- Amendment 4719
- Amendment 4720
- Amendment 4721
- Amendment 4722
- Amendment 4723
- Amendment 4724
- Amendment 4725
- Amendment 4726
- Amendment 4727
- Amendment 4728
- Amendment 4729
- Amendment 4730
- Amendment 4731
- Amendment 4732
- Amendment 4733
- Amendment 4734
- Amendment 4735
- Amendment 4736
- Amendment 4737
- Amendment 4738
- Amendment 4739
- Amendment 4740
- Amendment 4741
- Amendment 4742
- Amendment 4743
- Amendment 4744
- Amendment 4745
- Amendment 4746
- Amendment 4747
- Amendment 4748
- Amendment 4749
- Amendment 4750
- Amendment 4751
- Amendment 4752
- Amendment 4753
- Amendment 4754
- Amendment 4755
- Amendment 4756
- Amendment 4757
- Amendment 4758
- Amendment 4759
- Amendment 4760
- Amendment 4761
- Amendment 4762
- Amendment 4763
- Amendment 4764
- Amendment 4765
- Amendment 4766
- Amendment 4767
- Amendment 4768
- Amendment 4769
- Amendment 4770
- Amendment 4771
- Amendment 4772
- Amendment 4773
- Amendment 4774
- Amendment 4775
- Amendment 4776
- Amendment 4777
- Amendment 4778
- Amendment 4779
- Amendment 4780
- Amendment 4781
- Amendment 4782
- Amendment 4783
- Amendment 4784
- Amendment 4785
- Amendment 4786
- Amendment 4787
- Amendment 4788
- Amendment 4789
- Amendment 4790
- Amendment 4791
- Amendment 4792
- Amendment 4793
- Amendment 4794
- Amendment 4795
- Amendment 4796
- Amendment 4797
- Amendment 4798
- Amendment 4799
- Amendment 4800
- Amendment 4801
- Amendment 4802
- Amendment 4803
- Amendment 4804
- Amendment 4805
- Amendment 4806
- Amendment 4807
- Amendment 4808
- Amendment 4809
- Amendment 4810
- Amendment 4811
- Amendment 4812
- Amendment 4813
- Amendment 4814
- Amendment 4815
- Amendment 4816
- Amendment 4817
- Amendment 4818
- Amendment 4819
- Amendment 4820
- Amendment 4821
- Amendment 4822
- Amendment 4823
- Amendment 4824
- Amendment 4825
- Amendment 4826
- Amendment 4827
- Amendment 4828
- Amendment 4829
- Amendment 4830
- Amendment 4831
- Amendment 4832
- Amendment 4833
- Amendment 4834
- Amendment 4835
- Amendment 4836
- Amendment 4837
- Amendment 4838
- Amendment 4839
- Amendment 4840
- Amendment 4841
- Amendment 4842
- Amendment 4843
- Amendment 4844
- Amendment 4845
- Amendment 4846
- Amendment 4847
- Amendment 4848
- Amendment 4849
- Amendment 4850
- Amendment 4851
- Amendment 4852
- Amendment 4853
- Amendment 4854
- Amendment 4855
- Amendment 4856
- Amendment 4857
- Amendment 4858
- Amendment 4859
- Amendment 4860
- Amendment 4861
- Amendment 4862
- Amendment 4863
- Amendment 4864
- Amendment 4865
- Amendment 4866
- Amendment 4867
- Amendment 4868
- Amendment 4869
- Amendment 4870
- Amendment 4871
- Amendment 4872
- Amendment 4873
- Amendment 4874
- Amendment 4875
- Amendment 4876
- Amendment 4877
- Amendment 4878
- Amendment 4879
- Amendment 4880
- Amendment 4881
- Amendment 4882
- Amendment 4883
- Amendment 4884
- Amendment 4885
- Amendment 4886
- Amendment 4887
- Amendment 4888
- Amendment 4889
- Amendment 4890
- Amendment 4891
- Amendment 4892
- Amendment 4893
- Amendment 4894
- Amendment 4895
- Amendment 4896
- Amendment 4897
- Amendment 4898
- Amendment 4899
- Amendment 4900
- Amendment 4901
- Amendment 4902
Text 1,944 paragraphs
Amendment 4625
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| an | deleted |
| class="highlight-diff">[...] |
Or. en
Justification
Provisions related to CAP and CFP should be transferred to accordingly to the Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 (CMO Regulation) and Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CFP Regulation] .
Amendment 4626
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Read the rest (1,932 paragraphs)
Article 35 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Types of intervention | General principles |
Or. en
Amendment 4627
Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In line with the interventions listed in Article XX [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], the following CAP interventions are set out: | deleted |
| (a) degressive area-based income support; | |
| (b) coupled income support | |
| (c) crop specific payment for cotton | |
| (d) payment for natural and other area specific constraints; | |
| (e) support for disadvantages resulting from certain mandatory requirements; | |
| (f) agri-environmental and climate actions; | |
| (g) support for small farmers; | |
| (h) support for risk management tools; | |
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | |
| (j) support for the setting-up of young farmers, new farmers, rural businesses and start-ups and development of small farmers; | |
| (k) support for farm relief services; | |
| (l) LEADER; | |
| (m) Support for knowledge sharing and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas; | |
| (n) Territorial and local cooperation initiatives; | |
| (o) interventions in outermost regions referred to in Article 46 | |
| (p) interventions in smaller Aegean islands referred to in Article 42 | |
| (q) EU school scheme referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; | |
| (r) Support for interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title X of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
Or. en
Amendment 4628
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In line with the interventions listed in Article XX [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], the following CAP interventions are set out: | deleted |
| (a) degressive area-based income support; | |
| (b) coupled income support | |
| (c) crop specific payment for cotton | |
| (d) payment for natural and other area specific constraints; | |
| (e) support for disadvantages resulting from certain mandatory requirements; | |
| (f) agri-environmental and climate actions; | |
| (g) support for small farmers; | |
| (h) support for risk management tools; | |
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | |
| (j) support for the setting-up of young farmers, new farmers, rural businesses and start-ups and development of small farmers; | |
| (k) support for farm relief services; | |
| (l) LEADER; | |
| (m) Support for knowledge sharing and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas; | |
| (n) Territorial and local cooperation initiatives; | |
| (o) interventions in outermost regions referred to in Article 46 | |
| (p) interventions in smaller Aegean islands referred to in Article 42 | |
| (q) EU school scheme referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; | |
| (r) Support for interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title X of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from theNational and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common AgriculturalPolicy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to theCommon Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4629
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In line with the interventions listed in Article XX [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], the following CAP interventions are set out: | deleted |
| (a) degressive area-based income support; | |
| (b) coupled income support | |
| (c) crop specific payment for cotton | |
| (d) payment for natural and other area specific constraints; | |
| (e) support for disadvantages resulting from certain mandatory requirements; | |
| (f) agri-environmental and climate actions; | |
| (g) support for small farmers; | |
| (h) support for risk management tools; | |
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | |
| (j) support for the setting-up of young farmers, new farmers, rural businesses and start-ups and development of small farmers; | |
| (k) support for farm relief services; | |
| (l) LEADER; | |
| (m) Support for knowledge sharing and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas; | |
| (n) Territorial and local cooperation initiatives; | |
| (o) interventions in outermost regions referred to in Article 46 | |
| (p) interventions in smaller Aegean islands referred to in Article 42 | |
| (q) EU school scheme referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; | |
| (r) Support for interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title X of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4630
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In line with the interventions listed in Article XX [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], the following CAP interventions are set out: | deleted |
| (a) degressive area-based income support; | |
| (b) coupled income support | |
| (c) crop specific payment for cotton | |
| (d) payment for natural and other area specific constraints; | |
| (e) support for disadvantages resulting from certain mandatory requirements; | |
| (f) agri-environmental and climate actions; | |
| (g) support for small farmers; | |
| (h) support for risk management tools; | |
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | |
| (j) support for the setting-up of young farmers, new farmers, rural businesses and start-ups and development of small farmers; | |
| (k) support for farm relief services; | |
| (l) LEADER; | |
| (m) Support for knowledge sharing and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas; | |
| (n) Territorial and local cooperation initiatives; | |
| (o) interventions in outermost regions referred to in Article 46 | |
| (p) interventions in smaller Aegean islands referred to in Article 42 | |
| (q) EU school scheme referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; | |
| (r) Support for interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title X of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4631
Ivan David, Volker Schnurrbusch
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In line with the interventions listed in Article XX [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], the following CAP interventions are set out: | 1. The CAP interventions are the interventions listed in Article 5(1) [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. Ensuring that support contributes to viable agricultural production, food security and farmers’ income, while taking into account environmental objectives in a proportionate and economically sustainable manner: |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4632
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In line with the interventions listed in Article XX [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], the following CAP interventions are set out: | 1. The CAP interventions are provided for by Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. |
Or. fr
Amendment 4633
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In line with the interventions listed in Article XX [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], the following CAP interventions are set out: | 1. The CAP interventions are the interventions listed in Article 5(1) [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4634
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) degressive area-based income support; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4635
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) degressive area-based income support; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4636
Csaba Dömötör
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) degressive area-based income support; | (a) area-based income support; |
Or. en
Amendment 4637
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) coupled income support | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4638
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) coupled income support | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4639
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) crop specific payment for cotton | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4640
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) crop specific payment for cotton | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4641
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) payment for natural and other area specific constraints; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4642
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) payment for natural and other area specific constraints; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4643
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) support for disadvantages resulting from certain mandatory requirements; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4644
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) support for disadvantages resulting from certain mandatory requirements; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4645
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) agri-environmental and climate actions; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4646
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point f
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) agri-environmental and climate actions; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4647
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) support for small farmers; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4648
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) support for small farmers; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4649
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point g
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) support for small farmers; | (g) payment for small farmers; |
Or. en
Justification
As set forth in Art. 5 Reg. CAP
Amendment 4650
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point h
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) support for risk management tools; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4651
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point h
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) support for risk management tools; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4652
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4653
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4654
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | (i) support for investments in agriculture and forestry, including investments in processing, marketing, development of Annex I farm products of TFUE as well as in irrigation infrastructure. |
Or. en
Justification
A broader and more coherent wording should be provided so as to include investments for enterprises involved in the processing and marketing of agricultural products
Amendment 4655
Georgiana Teodorescu, Aurelijus Veryga
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders, including investments in the processing of agricultural products both on-farm and off-farm; |
Or. en
Amendment 4656
Esther Herranz García, Eric Sargiacomo, Gabriel Mato, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | (i) support for investments for farmers, producer organisations, and forest holders; |
Or. en
Amendment 4657
Emma Wiesner, Ciaran Mullooly, Dan Barna
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point i
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) support for investments for farmers and forest holders; | (i) support for investments for farmers; |
Or. en
Amendment 4658
Waldemar Buda, Bogdan Rzońca
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ia) investments increasing agricultural productivity, irrigation, storage, food processing and energy independence of farms. |
Or. en
Amendment 4659
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) support for the setting-up of young farmers, new farmers, rural businesses and start-ups and development of small farmers; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4660
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) support for the setting-up of young farmers, new farmers, rural businesses and start-ups and development of small farmers; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4661
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point j
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) support for the setting-up of young farmers, new farmers, rural businesses and start-ups and development of small farmers; | (j) support for the setting-up of young farmers or new farmers, rural businesses, start-ups, farm household income diversification and business development of small farmers; |
Or. en
Justification
As set forth in Art. 5 Reg. CAP.
Amendment 4662
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point k
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (k) support for farm relief services; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4663
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point k
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (k) support for farm relief services; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4664
Emma Wiesner, Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point k
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (k) support for farm relief services; | (k) support for farm relief services, on voluntary basis for Member States; |
Or. en
Amendment 4665
Georgiana Teodorescu, Aurelijus Veryga
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ka) support for the processing of agricultural products, both at farm level and outside the farm; |
Or. en
Justification
Processing activities are key to the vitality of rural areas, as they generate added value and employment locally. Therefore, support for processing of agricultural products should be maintained, as it contributes to the development of the bioeconomy and strengthens sustainable rural growth.
Amendment 4666
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point l
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (l) LEADER; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4667
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point l
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (l) LEADER; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4668
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (la) support for investments in enterprises processing or selling agricultural products. For non-productive investments contributing to the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(1)(d)(v), support may also be granted to other beneficiaries; |
Or. pt
Amendment 4669
Rosa Serrano Sierra, Cristina Maestre
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (la) support for women farmers |
Or. en
Amendment 4670
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point m
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (m) Support for knowledge sharing and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4671
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point m
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (m) Support for knowledge sharing and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4672
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point n
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (n) Territorial and local cooperation initiatives; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4673
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point n
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (n) Territorial and local cooperation initiatives; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4674
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point o
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (o) interventions in outermost regions referred to in Article 46 | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4675
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point o
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (o) interventions in outermost regions referred to in Article 46 | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4676
Younous Omarjee
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point o
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (o) interventions in outermost regions referred to in Article 46 | (o) specific interventions in outermost regions, set out in Regulation (EU) 228/2013 [POSEI Regulation]; |
Or. fr
Amendment 4677
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point o
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (o) interventions in outermost regions referred to in Article 46 | (o) additional interventions in outermost regions to supplement the measures provided for under Regulation (EU) No 228/2013; |
Or. pt
Amendment 4678
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point p
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (p) interventions in smaller Aegean islands referred to in Article 42 | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4679
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point p
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (p) interventions in smaller Aegean islands referred to in Article 42 | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4680
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point q
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (q) EU school scheme referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4681
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point q
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (q) EU school scheme referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4682
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point q
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (q) EU school scheme referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; | (q) EU school scheme referred to Part II, Title I, Chapter IIa, Section 2 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CMO Regulation]; |
Or. en
Amendment 4683
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (r) Support for interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title X of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4684
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (r) Support for interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title X of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4685
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (r) Support for interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title X of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. | (r) Interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Chapter IIa, Section 3 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CMO Regulation]. |
Or. en
Amendment 4686
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (r) Support for interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title X of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. | (r) Support for sectoral interventions referred to in Title X of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
Or. fr
Amendment 4687
André Franqueira Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ra) crisis payments to farmers following natural disasters, adverse climatic events and catastrophic events. |
Or. pt
Amendment 4688
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ra) crisis payments to farmers affected by natural disasters, adverse climatic events and catastrophic events. |
Or. pt
Amendment 4689
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ra) investments in food processing and marketing, developing the link between farming, food and territory. |
Or. en
Justification
The processing and marketing sectors are the main recipients of agricultural products at the local level. A significant number of companies operate in both the SME sector in the EU. A larger number of local processing plants gives farmers the ability to choose the recipient of their products and a real opportunity to negotiate prices (increasing the farmer's share in the value chain). Ensuring a fair income for farmers is a key element of the future CAP and the sector's resilience. Processing is a crucial link in the stabilizing food supply chain and guaranteeing its resilience and food security. Building resilience cannot be limited to supporting only the first phase – agricultural production. Support for the food processing industry is also essential, especially during periods of production surpluses or uncontrolled inflows of agricultural products from third countries.
Amendment 4690
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ra) interventions in border regions referred to in Article 48a |
Or. en
Amendment 4691
Nikolina Brnjac
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ra) support for competitiveness and innovations. |
Or. en
Amendment 4692
André Franqueira Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (rb) support for investments for enterprises processing or selling agricultural products. For beneficiaries that are not farmers, such support shall be financed outside the amount reserved for CAP direct support interventions, except where non-productive investment contributing to environmental, climate or territorial objectives is concerned. |
Or. pt
Justification
The goal is twofold: to protect the agricultural envelope for farmers but at the same time make it possible to support processing and marketing.
Amendment 4693
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (rb) support for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises |
Or. en
Amendment 4694
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (rb) transitional national aid. |
Or. en
Justification
Article 35 should be complemented by the possibility to continue transitional national aid (TNA).TNA should be continued as an instrument to support and stabilise agricultural incomes.
Amendment 4695
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r c (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (rc) investments in food processing and marketing, developing the link between farming, food and territory. |
Or. en
Amendment 4696
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point r d (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (rd) transitional national aid |
Or. en
Amendment 4697
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Title IV. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4698
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sebastian Everding
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Title IV. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4699
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Title IV. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4700
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Title IV. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4701
Younous Omarjee
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Title IV. | 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Article 349 TFEU and under Title [...] VI. All other interventions set out in paragraph 1 shall apply in the outermost regions. Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (o) may be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a)(ii) [Budget]. |
Or. fr
Amendment 4702
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Title IV. | 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Article 349 TFEU. All other interventions shall be applicable to those regions under conditions that take into account their specific characteristics and ensure effective, suitable support. |
Or. pt
Amendment 4703
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Title IV. | 2. Interventions listed in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) in Article 5 [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] shall be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4704
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost regions referred to in Title IV. | 2. The interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g) shall not apply to outermost and border regions referred to in Title IV. |
Or. en
Amendment 4705
Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. Where there is a significant risk of delay for the adoption of the NRP Plan after its submission by the Member State in accordance with Article 21(1) and at the latest by 31 January 2028, the Commission shall adopt a financing decision within the meaning of Article 110 of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 setting out the amounts corresponding to the year 2028 for interventions listed in Article 35(1)(a) to (g) [IACS] that are supported by the resources referred to in Article 10(2)(a)(ii), and interventions listed in Article 35(1)(q) [EU school scheme] provided that the obligation of ensuring the compliance of the submitted NRP Plan with all requirements laid down in this Regulation, in particular in Article 22, is fulfilled. The decision adopted under this subparagraph shall be replaced by the decision under Article 23(7) once it is adopted. |
Or. en
Amendment 4706
Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2b. Regarding the interventions referred to in Article 35(1)(a) to (g), a transitional arrangement for the geospatial aid declaration for the claim year 2028 shall be provided for (in the CAP Regulation), in the event that the NRPP plan has not been approved by the European Commission by 30 September 2027. This provision shall cover measures equivalent to those referred to in Article 35(1)(a) to (g) of the NRPP Regulation but established under Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, provided that such measures are already financed from the relevant funds in accordance with Article 10(2)(a)(ii). |
Or. en
Amendment 4707
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. | deleted |
| The planned average aid per hectare for degressive area-based income support referred in the first subparagraph shall not be less than EUR 130 and not more than EUR 240 for each Member State. For cotton, the aids are defined in Article 38. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4708
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. | deleted |
| The planned average aid per hectare for degressive area-based income support referred in the first subparagraph shall not be less than EUR 130 and not more than EUR 240 for each Member State. For cotton, the aids are defined in Article 38. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4709
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4710
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4711
Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. | 3.Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. As specified in article 10(2), point (a) (ii), for the sectoral interventions in the fruits and vegetables sector, the financing should remain at EU level and not subdivided into national allocations; The planned average aid per hectare for degressive area-based income support referred in the first subparagraph shall not be less than EUR 130 and not more than EUR 240 for each Member State. For cotton, the aids are defined in Article 38. |
Or. en
Amendment 4712
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. | Interventions listed in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) in Article 5 [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] shall be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. |
Or. en
Amendment 4713
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. | Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget], as shall measures applied under Regulation (EU) No 228/2013. |
Or. pt
Amendment 4714
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Carlo Fidanza, Ruggero Razza, Francesco Ventola, Waldemar Buda, Jessika van Leeuwen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) and (r) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. | Interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (k) shall be income support interventions to be financed from the Fund in accordance with Article 10(2), point (a) (ii) [Budget]. |
Or. en
Justification
This provision will be transferred to the CAP regulation, while it must be clarified that the sectoral interventions (point r) must be financed directly from the EU budget and not sourced from national allocations.
Amendment 4715
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Carlo Fidanza, Ruggero Razza, Francesco Ventola, Waldemar Buda, Jessika van Leeuwen
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| As specified in article 10(2), interventions in certain sectors referred to in Regulation (EU) 202X/XXX [CAP Regulation] article 5(1) point (r), shall be financed directly from the budget at EU level and not sourced from national allocations. |
Or. en
Justification
To ensure that sectoral interventions can continue to be adequately financed on a non-discriminatory basis, regardless of the Member State where the producer organisation (PO), APO or TPO is based, sectoral interventions should continue to be financed directly from the EU-budget and not sourced from national allocations. Until now the support for producer organisations is funded directly from EAGF. In this way producers are incentivized to work together, regardless of the Member State they are located in, and even across Member States.
Amendment 4716
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The planned average aid per hectare for degressive area-based income support referred in the first subparagraph shall not be less than EUR 130 and not more than EUR 240 for each Member State. For cotton, the aids are defined in Article 38. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4717
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The planned average aid per hectare for degressive area-based income support referred in the first subparagraph shall not be less than EUR 130 and not more than EUR 240 for each Member State. For cotton, the aids are defined in Article 38. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4718
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The planned average aid per hectare for degressive area-based income support referred in the first subparagraph shall not be less than EUR 130 and not more than EUR 240 for each Member State. For cotton, the aids are defined in Article 38. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4719
Maria Grapini
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The planned average aid per hectare for degressive area-based income support referred in the first subparagraph shall not be less than EUR 130 and not more than EUR 240 for each Member State. For cotton, the aids are defined in Article 38. | The planned average aid per hectare for degressive area-based income support referred in the first subparagraph shall not be less than EUR 130 and not more than EUR 240 for each Member State. For cotton, the aids are defined in Article 38 and the amount shall be the same for all farmers. |
Or. ro
Amendment 4720
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The planned average aid per hectare for degressive area-based income support referred to in the first subparagraph shall be progressively adjusted to ensure that all Member States reach the same level of planned average aid per hectare by claim year 2030. |
Or. en
Amendment 4721
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | deleted |
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4722
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4723
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (f) and (h) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (l) [investments for farmers] shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (i) in the outermost regions and interventions targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. The maximum support rate applicable to the non-productive investments referred to in paragraph 1 point (i) contributing to the specific objective set out in Article 3(1)(d)(v) shall be 100 % of the eligible costs of an operation. |
| In outermost regions, the minimum national contribution for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, except for those referred to in points (a), (b), (c) and (g), for which those regions are not eligible, shall not be more than 15 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. No minimum national contribution shall be required for interventions under Regulation (EU) No 228/2013. |
Or. pt
Amendment 4724
André Franqueira Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Without prejudice to Article 20(4), the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (f) and (h) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. However, for interventions located in outermost regions, the minimum national contribution shall be 15 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to interventions located in the outermost regions and to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (i), targeting young farmers, shall be 85% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. The maximum support rate applicable to the non-productive investments referred to in paragraph 1 point (i) contributing to the specific objective set out in Article 3(1)(d)(v) shall be 100 % of the eligible costs of the operation. |
Or. pt
Justification
As regiões ultraperiféricas enfrentam constrangimentos estruturais permanentes reconhecidos pelo artigo 349.º do TFUE, incluindo afastamento, insularidade, reduzida dimensão dos mercados e custos de produção acrescidos. Uma contribuição nacional mínima reduzida e uma taxa de apoio mais elevada são necessárias para assegurar a viabilidade dos investimentos agrícolas nestas regiões. Os investimentos não produtivos que contribuam para objetivos ambientais, climáticos, de água, biodiversidade ou resiliência devem poder beneficiar de uma taxa de apoio de 100 %, uma vez que geram bens públicos sem retorno económico imediato para os beneficiários.
Amendment 4725
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in Article 5, paragraph 1, points (d) to (k) [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. |
| At least 8% of the total amount dedicated to rural development shall be reserved for LEADER. |
Or. en
Amendment 4726
Ivan David, Volker Schnurrbusch, Stanislav Stoyanov
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in Article 5 paragraph 1 points (d) to (f) and (h) to (j) and (l) to (p) and (s) [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] shall be no less than 30% and no more than 70 % of the total estimated costs of each intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
A balanced approach to national co-financing is necessary to preserve the level playing field within the internal market and to avoid excessive disparities in public support capacities between Member States. Establishing minimum and maximum co-financing rates would provide sufficient flexibility for Member States while preventing disproportionate competitive distortions and excessive concentration of support resulting from significantly diverging national contributions.
Amendment 4727
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in Article 5 paragraph 1 points (d) to (f) and (h) to (j) and (l) to (p) and (s) [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4728
David Cormand, Gordan Bosanac, Damian Boeselager
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in Article 5 in paragraph 1 points (d), (e) and (h) to (k) [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. |
Or. en
Amendment 4729
Sofie Eriksson, Johan Danielsson, Heléne Fritzon, Evin Incir, Adnan Dibrani
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (e) and (g) to (k) [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. |
Or. en
Amendment 4730
Cristina Maestre, Dario Nardella, Elena Sancho Murillo, Stefano Bonaccini, Rosa Serrano Sierra
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in Article 5 paragraph 1 points (l) to (n) and (s) [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 20XX/XXX [CAP Regulation] shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. |
Or. en
Amendment 4731
Georgiana Teodorescu, Aurelijus Veryga
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (f) (e) and (h) to (k) shall be no less than [30] % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
Interventions referred to in Article 35(1)(f) should not be financed from national resources, as this would distort the level playing field and weaken the common financing logic of the CAP.
Amendment 4732
Emma Wiesner, Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% and no more than 80% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. |
Or. en
Amendment 4733
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than 30% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 points (d) to (k) shall be no less than [30]% of the total eligible public expenditure of each intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
As specified by the Commission in the Ad Hoc Working Party MFF-NRP of 11 March 2026.
Amendment 4734
Stefan Köhler
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point 1 (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1) At least 5 % of the total amount dedicated to rural development set out in Article 10(2)(a)(ii) (a) shall be set out for crisis payments to farmers following natural disasters, adverse climatic events and catastrophic events under Article 5(1), point (s) of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. |
Or. en
Amendment 4735
Jérémy Decerle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| In Outermost regions, the minimum national contribution to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 shall be no less than [15 %] of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. There is no minimum national contribution to interventions set out in Regulation 228/2013 [POSEI Regulation]. |
Or. en
Justification
The Outermost Regions require substantial support from the Union. Historically, this is why POSEI interventions were fully financed by the EU, and a specific co-financing rate of 15% was implemented for rural development measures. The purpose of this proposed amendment is to maintain the same level of support within the future CAP framework.
Amendment 4736
Luke Ming Flanagan, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sebastian Everding
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| At least 40 % of the total amount dedicated to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii), shall be reserved for support for agri-environmental and climate actions under Article 5(1), points (d, e & f), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. |
Or. en
Amendment 4737
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| At least 35 % of the total amount dedicated to CAP interventions set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii), shall be reserved for agri-environmental and climate actions under Article 5(1), point (f), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. |
Or. en
Justification
35% target shall be a horizontal CAP envelope target, reflecting on the current funding levels for eco-schemes and agri-environmental measures while providing additional resources for the new transition schemes.
Amendment 4738
Marta Wcisło, Magdalena Adamowicz
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the minimum national contribution for interventions implemented in Eastern border regions shall be not less than 5% of the total estimated costs of each intervention. |
Or. en
Amendment 4739
Sofie Eriksson, Johan Danielsson, Heléne Fritzon, Evin Incir, Adnan Dibrani
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], additional national contributions to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (f), may be made. |
Or. en
Amendment 4740
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4741
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4742
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
A balanced approach to national co-financing is necessary to preserve the level playing field within the internal market and to avoid excessive disparities in public support capacities between Member States. Establishing minimum and maximum co-financing rates would provide sufficient flexibility for Member States while preventing disproportionate competitive distortions and excessive concentration of support resulting from significantly diverging national contributions.
Amendment 4743
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4744
Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. | The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] point (i) shall be, as a general rule, 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. By way of derogation, the maximum support rate may be increased up to 100% for certain investments, including the non-productive ones. |
Or. en
Amendment 4745
Sofie Eriksson, Johan Danielsson, Heléne Fritzon, Evin Incir, Adnan Dibrani
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. | The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. Moreover, non-productive investments contributing to environmental, climate or biodiversity objectives may be supported up to 100 % of the total eligible costs. |
Or. en
Amendment 4746
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. | The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure, but, by way of derogation, it may be increased to 100 % for certain investments, including non-productive investments. |
Or. pl
Amendment 4747
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. | The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i) applied in the outermost regions and the interventions targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. |
Or. pt
Amendment 4748
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (1) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of the eligible public expenditure. | The maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 point (i) [investments for farmers] shall be 75% of the total eligible costs of each intervention. However, the maximum support rate applicable to the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (i), targeting young farmers shall be 85 % of total eligible costs of each intervention. |
Or. en
Amendment 4749
Norbert Lins, Marion Walsmann, Stefan Köhler, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Herbert Dorfmann, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Esther Herranz García, Daniel Buda, Lena Düpont
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| At least X % of the total amount dedicated to rural development set out in Article 10(2)(a)(ii)(b) shall be reserved for agri-environmental and climate actions under Article 5(1), point (f), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. |
Or. en
Amendment 4750
Marta Wcisło, Magdalena Adamowicz
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum Union support rate applicable to interventions implemented in Eastern border regions shall be 95 % of the eligible expenditure. |
Or. en
Amendment 4751
Norbert Lins, Marion Walsmann, Stefan Köhler, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Herbert Dorfmann, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Daniel Buda, Lena Düpont
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| At least 8 % of the amount dedicated to the CAP income support set out in Article 10 (2) (a) (ii) (a) shall be allocated to interventions targeting young farmers. |
Or. en
Amendment 4752
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. At least 30 % of the total Union contribution allocated to the CAP income support interventions referred to in paragraph 3 [financed under Article 10(2), point (a)(ii)] shall be reserved for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in paragraph 1, point (f). That reserved share shall not be drawn from, or result in a reduction of, the resources intended for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (d), (g) and (j), nor for the specific measures for mountain, island, border and other less developed and disadvantaged areas. Member States shall ensure that the application of this minimum share does not reduce the overall level of income support available to farmers, in particular small farmers and farmers in areas facing natural or demographic constraints. |
Or. en
Justification
Guaranteeing that at least 30 % of CAP income support interventions are reserved for agri-environmental and climate actions maintains a high level of environmental ambition, above the current level, while a clear safeguard clause ensures this ring-fencing is not drawn from basic and coupled income support, livestock farming or measures for mountain, island and disadvantaged areas. Environmental ambition and income support are thus reconciled rather than set against one another.
Amendment 4753
Jérémy Decerle, Ciaran Mullooly, Charles Goerens
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. At least 25 % of the total amount dedicated to CAP interventions set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii)(b), shall be reserved for agri-environmental and climate actions under Article 5(1), point (f), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], whether in full EU financing or in co-financing. |
Or. en
Justification
Since the beginning of the CAP 2023 - 2027 programming period, payments for both eco-schemes and AECCs accounted on average for nearly 28% of total EU public funding under the CAP strategic plans (European Commission - DG Agri). For the 2028 - 2034 CAP programming period, farmers will need a similar level of support to ensure continuity of practices and predictability. This dedicated budget enables also the reinstatement of the common features of the policy.
Amendment 4754
Ivan David, Volker Schnurrbusch
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. At least 20 % of the total amount dedicated to rural development set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii)(b), shall be reserved for agri-environmental and climate actions under Article 5(1), point (f), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. |
Or. en
Justification
Reducing the mandatory earmarking for agri-environmental and climate actions would provide Member States with greater flexibility to address their specific agricultural, environmental and territorial needs in accordance with their national circumstances and priorities. The amendment maintains a significant minimum allocation for environmental and climate objectives, while allowing a more balanced distribution of resources across the different objectives of the CAP and avoiding excessive constraints on the programming of rural development interventions.
Amendment 4755
Ivan David, Volker Schnurrbusch
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4b. At least 6 % of the total amount dedicated to CAP interventions set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii), shall be set out for interventions targeting young farmers. |
Or. en
Justification
While strong support for young farmers remains essential to encourage generational renewal and facilitate access to the agricultural sector, allocating 10% of direct payment envelopes exclusively to this objective would risk reducing the resources available for other farmers who also face significant economic, environmental and market challenges. A 6% allocation provides a balanced and sufficiently attractive level of support for young farmers, ensuring a meaningful incentive for genuine entrants to the sector while preserving adequate funding for the wider farming community. This approach promotes generational renewal without creating disproportionate financial incentives that could encourage applications motivated primarily by access to support rather than by a genuine commitment to establishing and developing a viable agricultural business. The proposed percentage therefore strikes an appropriate balance between encouraging young farmers, maintaining fairness across the sector, and safeguarding the overall effectiveness of agricultural support.
Amendment 4756
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The financial allocation to coupled income support interventions as referred to in paragraph 1, point (b) shall be limited to a maximum of 20% of the Union contribution set out by the Member State in the NRP Plan for CAP income support interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (c), (f) and (g). This percentage may be increased by a maximum of 5 percentage points, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding 20% is allocated to protein crops, farmers combining the production of crops and livestock or agricultural areas at a risk of abandonment of agricultural production in particular in the Eastern border regions, defined in the Plans. For the purposes of this Article, Eastern border regions means Union NUTS2 regions bordering the Russian Federation, Belarus or the Ukraine, by land or sea, not covering the entire territory of the Member State concerned. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4757
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The financial allocation to coupled income support interventions as referred to in paragraph 1, point (b) shall be limited to a maximum of 20% of the Union contribution set out by the Member State in the NRP Plan for CAP income support interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (c), (f) and (g). This percentage may be increased by a maximum of 5 percentage points, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding 20% is allocated to protein crops, farmers combining the production of crops and livestock or agricultural areas at a risk of abandonment of agricultural production in particular in the Eastern border regions, defined in the Plans. For the purposes of this Article, Eastern border regions means Union NUTS2 regions bordering the Russian Federation, Belarus or the Ukraine, by land or sea, not covering the entire territory of the Member State concerned. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4758
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The financial allocation to coupled income support interventions as referred to in paragraph 1, point (b) shall be limited to a maximum of 20% of the Union contribution set out by the Member State in the NRP Plan for CAP income support interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (c), (f) and (g). This percentage may be increased by a maximum of 5 percentage points, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding 20% is allocated to protein crops, farmers combining the production of crops and livestock or agricultural areas at a risk of abandonment of agricultural production in particular in the Eastern border regions, defined in the Plans. For the purposes of this Article, Eastern border regions means Union NUTS2 regions bordering the Russian Federation, Belarus or the Ukraine, by land or sea, not covering the entire territory of the Member State concerned. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4759
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The financial allocation to coupled income support interventions as referred to in paragraph 1, point (b) shall be limited to a maximum of 20% of the Union contribution set out by the Member State in the NRP Plan for CAP income support interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (c), (f) and (g). This percentage may be increased by a maximum of 5 percentage points, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding 20% is allocated to protein crops, farmers combining the production of crops and livestock or agricultural areas at a risk of abandonment of agricultural production in particular in the Eastern border regions, defined in the Plans. For the purposes of this Article, Eastern border regions means Union NUTS2 regions bordering the Russian Federation, Belarus or the Ukraine, by land or sea, not covering the entire territory of the Member State concerned. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4760
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The financial allocation to coupled income support interventions as referred to in paragraph 1, point (b) shall be limited to a maximum of 20% of the Union contribution set out by the Member State in the NRP Plan for CAP income support interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (c), (f) and (g). This percentage may be increased by a maximum of 5 percentage points, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding 20% is allocated to protein crops, farmers combining the production of crops and livestock or agricultural areas at a risk of abandonment of agricultural production in particular in the Eastern border regions, defined in the Plans. For the purposes of this Article, Eastern border regions means Union NUTS2 regions bordering the Russian Federation, Belarus or the Ukraine, by land or sea, not covering the entire territory of the Member State concerned. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4761
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The financial allocation to coupled income support interventions as referred to in paragraph 1, point (b) shall be limited to a maximum of 20% of the Union contribution set out by the Member State in the NRP Plan for CAP income support interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (c), (f) and (g). This percentage may be increased by a maximum of 5 percentage points, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding 20% is allocated to protein crops, farmers combining the production of crops and livestock or agricultural areas at a risk of abandonment of agricultural production in particular in the Eastern border regions, defined in the Plans. For the purposes of this Article, Eastern border regions means Union NUTS2 regions bordering the Russian Federation, Belarus or the Ukraine, by land or sea, not covering the entire territory of the Member State concerned. | 5. The financial allocation to coupled income support interventions as referred to in paragraph 1, point (b) shall be limited to a maximum of 20% of the Union contribution set out by the Member State in the NRP Plan for CAP income support interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (c), (f) and (g). This percentage may be increased by a maximum of 5 percentage points, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding 20% is allocated to protein crops, livestock production sectors, including beef cattle, farmers combining the production of crops and livestock or agricultural areas at a risk of abandonment of agricultural production in particular in the Eastern border regions, defined in the Plans. For the purposes of this Article, Eastern border regions means Union NUTS2 regions bordering the Russian Federation, Belarus or the Ukraine, by land or sea, not covering the entire territory of the Member State concerned. The list of sectors eligible for coupled income support shall include at least the sectors mentioned in Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, including beef and veal. |
Or. pl
Amendment 4762
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The financial allocation to coupled income support interventions as referred to in paragraph 1, point (b) shall be limited to a maximum of 20% of the Union contribution set out by the Member State in the NRP Plan for CAP income support interventions referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (c), (f) and (g). This percentage may be increased by a maximum of 5 percentage points, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding 20% is allocated to protein crops, farmers combining the production of crops and livestock or agricultural areas at a risk of abandonment of agricultural production in particular in the Eastern border regions, defined in the Plans. For the purposes of this Article, Eastern border regions means Union NUTS2 regions bordering the Russian Federation, Belarus or the Ukraine, by land or sea, not covering the entire territory of the Member State concerned. | 5. The financial allocation to coupled income support interventions as referred to in paragraph 1, point (b) shall be limited to a maximum of 30% of the Union contribution set out by the Member State in the NRP Plan for all measures financed by the Fund under Article 10(2), point (a)(ii)(a). This percentage may be increased by a maximum of 5 percentage points, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding 30% is allocated to protein crops, farmers combining the production of crops and livestock or agricultural areas at a risk of abandonment of agricultural production in particular in the Eastern border regions, defined in the Plans. For the purposes of this Article, Eastern border regions means Union NUTS2 regions bordering the Russian Federation, Belarus or the Ukraine, by land or sea, not covering the entire territory of the Member State concerned. |
Or. fr
Amendment 4763
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. The minimum national contribution to the total eligible public expenditure of the EU school scheme interventions referred to in Title, Part II, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30% of the total eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | deleted |
| Member States may, in addition to Union financial assistance and the national contribution to the costs of the interventions referred to in the first subparagraph, grant additional national financing. | |
| The amount of Union financial assistance set out the NRP Plan for the awareness-raising interventions referred to in Article 29 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall not exceed 15 % of the total amount of the Union financial assistance and the national contribution set out in the NRP Plan for the EU school scheme interventions referred to in the first subparagraph. | |
| The amount of Union financial assistance set out in the NRP Plan for the supply and distribution of products containing free sugars or having a fat content above 4 % shall not exceed 10 % of the total amount of the Union financial assistance and the national contribution set out in the NRP Plan for the interventions referred to in the first subparagraph. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4764
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The minimum national contribution to the total eligible public expenditure of the EU school scheme interventions referred to in Title, Part II, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30% of the total eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4765
Waldemar Buda, Bogdan Rzońca
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The minimum national contribution to the total eligible public expenditure of the EU school scheme interventions referred to in Title, Part II, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30% of the total eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
The EU School Scheme should remain financed and governed under Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. Its financing should not be subject to programming decisions under National and Regional Partnership Plans, in order to preserve the common nature of the scheme, equal treatment of Member States and stable Union financing.
Amendment 4766
David Cormand, Gordan Bosanac, Damian Boeselager
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The minimum national contribution to the total eligible public expenditure of the EU school scheme interventions referred to in Title, Part II, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30% of the total eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | The minimum national contribution to the total eligible public expenditure of the EU school scheme interventions referred to in Title, Part II, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 0% of the total eligible public expenditure of each intervention. |
Or. en
Amendment 4767
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The minimum national contribution to the total eligible public expenditure of the EU school scheme interventions referred to in Title, Part II, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30% of the total eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | The EU contribution to the total eligible public expenditure of the EU school scheme interventions referred to in Title, Part II, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 100% of the total eligible public expenditure of each intervention. |
Or. pt
Amendment 4768
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States may, in addition to Union financial assistance and the national contribution to the costs of the interventions referred to in the first subparagraph, grant additional national financing. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4769
David Cormand, Gordan Bosanac, Damian Boeselager
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States may, in addition to Union financial assistance and the national contribution to the costs of the interventions referred to in the first subparagraph, grant additional national financing. | Member States may, in addition to Union financial assistance referred to in the first subparagraph, grant additional national financing. |
Or. en
Amendment 4770
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The amount of Union financial assistance set out the NRP Plan for the awareness-raising interventions referred to in Article 29 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall not exceed 15 % of the total amount of the Union financial assistance and the national contribution set out in the NRP Plan for the EU school scheme interventions referred to in the first subparagraph. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4771
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The amount of Union financial assistance set out in the NRP Plan for the supply and distribution of products containing free sugars or having a fat content above 4 % shall not exceed 10 % of the total amount of the Union financial assistance and the national contribution set out in the NRP Plan for the interventions referred to in the first subparagraph. | deleted |
Or. fr
Justification
Transferred to CMO
Amendment 4772
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The amount of Union financial assistance set out in the NRP Plan for the supply and distribution of products containing free sugars or having a fat content above 4 % shall not exceed 10 % of the total amount of the Union financial assistance and the national contribution set out in the NRP Plan for the interventions referred to in the first subparagraph. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4773
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The amount of Union financial assistance set out in the NRP Plan for the supply and distribution of products containing free sugars or having a fat content above 4 % shall not exceed 10 % of the total amount of the Union financial assistance and the national contribution set out in the NRP Plan for the interventions referred to in the first subparagraph. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
this is an useless paragraph: in the school schemes fruits, vegetables and milk products are distributed. Whereas some cheeses could have a fat content above 4% they compensate with vitamins and proteins. If the EU chooses to deliver dairy products, all dairy products should be included. Same as for fruits and juices. At the same time we cannot forget that we need to simplify the procedure for the schools.
Amendment 4774
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The amount of Union financial assistance set out in the NRP Plan for the supply and distribution of products containing free sugars or having a fat content above 4 % shall not exceed 10 % of the total amount of the Union financial assistance and the national contribution set out in the NRP Plan for the interventions referred to in the first subparagraph. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4775
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The amount of Union financial assistance set out in the NRP Plan for the supply and distribution of products containing free sugars or having a fat content above 4 % shall not exceed 10 % of the total amount of the Union financial assistance and the national contribution set out in the NRP Plan for the interventions referred to in the first subparagraph. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4776
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The EU school scheme shall be without prejudice to any separate national school schemes which are compatible with Union legislation. Union funding may be used to extend the scope or effectiveness of any existing national school schemes or school distribution schemes providing fruit, vegetables and milk in educational establishments but shall not replace funding for those existing national schemes, except for free distribution of meals to children in educational establishments. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4777
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The EU school scheme shall be without prejudice to any separate national school schemes which are compatible with Union legislation. Union funding may be used to extend the scope or effectiveness of any existing national school schemes or school distribution schemes providing fruit, vegetables and milk in educational establishments but shall not replace funding for those existing national schemes, except for free distribution of meals to children in educational establishments. | deleted |
Or. fr
Justification
Transferred to CMO
Amendment 4778
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sebastian Everding
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The EU school scheme shall be without prejudice to any separate national school schemes which are compatible with Union legislation. Union funding may be used to extend the scope or effectiveness of any existing national school schemes or school distribution schemes providing fruit, vegetables and milk in educational establishments but shall not replace funding for those existing national schemes, except for free distribution of meals to children in educational establishments. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4779
Waldemar Buda, Bogdan Rzońca
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The EU school scheme shall be without prejudice to any separate national school schemes which are compatible with Union legislation. Union funding may be used to extend the scope or effectiveness of any existing national school schemes or school distribution schemes providing fruit, vegetables and milk in educational establishments but shall not replace funding for those existing national schemes, except for free distribution of meals to children in educational establishments. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
The EU School Scheme should remain financed and governed under Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. Its financing should not be subject to programming decisions under National and Regional Partnership Plans, in order to preserve the common nature of the scheme, equal treatment of Member States and stable Union financing.
Amendment 4780
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The EU school scheme shall be without prejudice to any separate national school schemes which are compatible with Union legislation. Union funding may be used to extend the scope or effectiveness of any existing national school schemes or school distribution schemes providing fruit, vegetables and milk in educational establishments but shall not replace funding for those existing national schemes, except for free distribution of meals to children in educational establishments. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4781
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 7
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The EU school scheme shall be without prejudice to any separate national school schemes which are compatible with Union legislation. Union funding may be used to extend the scope or effectiveness of any existing national school schemes or school distribution schemes providing fruit, vegetables and milk in educational establishments but shall not replace funding for those existing national schemes, except for free distribution of meals to children in educational establishments. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4782
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | deleted |
| The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. | |
| By way of derogation from the first and second subparagraph, the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of interventions in the apiculture sector implemented by beneficiaries other than producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups shall be at least equal to the Union financial assistance granted for these interventions. | |
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time. | |
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may also decide to compensate producers for loss of revenue due to the implementation of the interventions referred to in Article 31, point (n), of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, by covering up to 100 % of the relevant loss for a maximum period of three years. | |
| By way of derogation from second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate for interventions concerning market withdrawals for free distribution to 100 % for market withdrawals which do not exceed 5 % of the volume of the production marketed by a producer organisation. The volume of the production shall be calculated as the average of the overall volumes of products for which the producer organisation is recognised and which are marketed by the producer organisation during the three previous years. Member States shall ensure that the compensation granted for market withdrawals does not exceed the market price of the withdrawn products. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4783
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4784
David Cormand, Gordan Bosanac, Damian Boeselager
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention with the exception of the fruit and vegetables and protein crops sectors, where it shall be 0%. |
Or. en
Amendment 4785
Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo, Stefano Bonaccini, Rosa Serrano Sierra
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the Union financial assistance shall be equal to the amount of the financial contribution referred to in Article 33(3), point (a) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013, actually paid and limited to 50% of the actual expenditure incurred of each of the intervention in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
Or. en
Amendment 4786
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CMO Regulation] shall be [30] % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
In addition to the amendment, the percentage of EU aid should be explicitly stated in the legislation too.
Amendment 4787
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. | Subject to compliance with Article 20(4) [national contribution to the estimated costs], the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Part II, Chapter IIa, Section 3 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be 30 % of the eligible public expenditure of each intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4788
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4789
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. | deleted |
Or. fr
Justification
Transferred to CMO
Amendment 4790
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4791
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4792
David Cormand, Gordan Bosanac, Damian Boeselager
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 4793
Esther Herranz García, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Maravillas Abadía Jover
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. | The maximum public support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. The minimum rate of public support applicable to operations carried out under operational programmes shall be 50 % of the total eligible costs. |
Or. es
Amendment 4794
Esther Herranz García, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. | The maximum public support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
Sectorial interventions within the current CAP should be continued given the important role those interventions play for climate mitigation and adaptation and their co-financing rates maintained.
Amendment 4795
Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 75 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. | The maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 80 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. |
Or. ro
Amendment 4796
Esther Herranz García, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The minimum rate of public support applicable to operations carried out under operational programmes shall be 50% of the total eligible costs. |
Or. en
Justification
Sectorial interventions within the current CAP should be continued given the important role those interventions play their co-financing rates maintained.
Amendment 4797
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the first and second subparagraph, the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of interventions in the apiculture sector implemented by beneficiaries other than producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups shall be at least equal to the Union financial assistance granted for these interventions. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4798
David Cormand, Gordan Bosanac, Damian Boeselager
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the first and second subparagraph, the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of interventions in the apiculture sector implemented by beneficiaries other than producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups shall be at least equal to the Union financial assistance granted for these interventions. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 4799
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the first and second subparagraph, the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of interventions in the apiculture sector implemented by beneficiaries other than producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups shall be at least equal to the Union financial assistance granted for these interventions. | By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure of interventions in the apiculture sector implemented by beneficiaries other than producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups shall be at least equal to the Union financial assistance granted for these interventions. |
Or. en
Amendment 4800
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time. | deleted |
Or. fr
Justification
Transferred to CMO
Amendment 4801
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4802
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4803
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4804
Georgiana Teodorescu, Aurelijus Veryga
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time. | By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time and up to 100 % for interventions linked to knowledge sharing and innovation. |
Or. en
Justification
95 % support rate for interventions under point (m) [knowledge sharing and innovation], is insufficient. Given their importance for competitiveness and resilience, the rate should be raised up to 100%. Activities under AKIS measures are mostly non-commercial in nature, which makes it difficult for the entities implementing them to contribute their own funds, as they are not always profit-making entities. In addition, non-100% financing of advisory and training measures may reduce the popularity of such measures among final beneficiaries, who would have to pay extra for this type of service.
Amendment 4805
Esther Herranz García, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Charles Goerens, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time. | By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations and associations of producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time. |
Or. en
Amendment 4806
Esther Herranz García, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Maravillas Abadía Jover
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations implementing operational programmes for the first time. | By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate to up to 95 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention for interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, and for producer organisations and producer associations implementing operational programmes for the first time. |
Or. es
Amendment 4807
Norbert Lins, Lena Düpont, Marion Walsmann, Stefan Köhler, Oliver Schenk, Andrea Wechsler
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the first and second subparagraphs, there shall be no minimum national contribution to the eligible public expenditure for interventions in the hops sector referred to in Article 31, points (a) to (j), of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, and the maximum support rate applicable to those interventions shall be 100 % of the total eligible costs of each intervention. To that end, Germany shall be allocated EUR 2 188 000 in financial assistance per budgetary year. In allocating resources, Germany shall allocate the individual producer organisations or associations thereof the maximum amount of Union financial assistance in relation to the number of hectares on which that producer organisation cultivates hops. |
Or. de
Amendment 4808
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may also decide to compensate producers for loss of revenue due to the implementation of the interventions referred to in Article 31, point (n), of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, by covering up to 100 % of the relevant loss for a maximum period of three years. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4809
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may also decide to compensate producers for loss of revenue due to the implementation of the interventions referred to in Article 31, point (n), of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, by covering up to 100 % of the relevant loss for a maximum period of three years. | deleted |
Or. fr
Justification
Transferred to CMO
Amendment 4810
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may also decide to compensate producers for loss of revenue due to the implementation of the interventions referred to in Article 31, point (n), of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, by covering up to 100 % of the relevant loss for a maximum period of three years. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4811
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, Member States may also decide to compensate producers for loss of revenue due to the implementation of the interventions referred to in Article 31, point (n), of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, by covering up to 100 % of the relevant loss for a maximum period of three years. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4812
Esther Herranz García, Charles Goerens, Emmanouil Kefalogiannis, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Gabriel Mato
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, Member States shall cover up to 50% of the eligible costs for interventions in Article 31 points (a), (b), (c), (e), (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (o), (r), (v) and (w) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 in the wine sector. The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 point (u) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 100% of the eligible costs. The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 points (d) and (s) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 80% of eligible expenditure and 90% for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC active in the wine sector. The financial assistance for investments referred to in Article 31 point (a) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may be increased to up to 80% of eligible costs for actions linked to the objective of contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation and to the improvement of the sustainability of production systems and the reduction of the environmental impact of the Union wine sector. | |
| The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 points (f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover 80% of the eligible costs. The financial assistance for permanent grubbing up referred to in Article 31 point (t) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 shall not exceed 70% of the sum of the direct costs of operating the grubbing up and the estimated loss of revenue incurred during the calendar of one year for the grubbed up area following the grubbing up. In addition, Member States may provide a national contribution to the intervention of up to 30 % of the sum of the direct costs of operating the grubbing up and the estimated loss of revenue incurred during the calendar of one year for the area grubbed up following the grubbing up. The financial assistance for temporary withdrawal referred to in Article 31 points (x) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 80% of the eligible costs for actions linked to the vineyard parcels itself and maintenance of vineyard parcels and their preservation in good agricultural and environmental condition as well as biodiversity measures. Member States may provide a national contribution to the intervention of up to 20 % of the sum of the eligible costs. |
Or. en
Justification
Wine sectorial interventions within the current CAP should count on a minimum allocated amount given the crisis faced by the sector for which EP and Council adopted the Regulation (EU) 2026/471. This regulation includes relevant provisions to tackle, among other things, the effects of climate change for the wine sector. The figures included refer to the figures in place nowadays in Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 (CAP Strategic Plans Regulation).
Amendment 4813
Norbert Lins
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 5 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, interventions in the wine sector shall not be subject to any national contribution. | |
| The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 point (u) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 100% of the eligible costs. | |
| The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 points (d) and (s) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 80% of eligible expenditure and 90% for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC active in the wine sector. | |
| The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 point (a) and (n) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may be increased to up to 80% of eligible costs for actions linked to the objective of contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation and to the improvement of the sustainability of production systems and the reduction of the environmental impact of the Union wine sector. | |
| The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 points (f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover 80% of the eligible costs. · | |
| The financial assistance for permanent grubbing up referred to in Article 31 point (t) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 shall not exceed 70% of the sum of the direct costs of operating the grubbing up and the estimated loss of revenue incurred during the calendar of one year for the grubbed up area following the grubbing up. In addition, Member States may provide a national contribution to the intervention of up to 30 % of the sum of the direct costs of operating the grubbing up and the estimated loss of revenue incurred during the calendar of one year for the area grubbed up following the grubbing up. | |
| The financial assistance for temporary withdrawal referred to in Article 31 points (x) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 80% of the eligible costs for actions linked to the vineyard parcels itself and maintenance of vineyard parcels and their preservation in good agricultural and environmental condition as well as biodiversity measures. Member States may provide a national contribution to the intervention of up to 20 % of the sum of the eligible costs. |
Or. en
Amendment 4814
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate for interventions concerning market withdrawals for free distribution to 100 % for market withdrawals which do not exceed 5 % of the volume of the production marketed by a producer organisation. The volume of the production shall be calculated as the average of the overall volumes of products for which the producer organisation is recognised and which are marketed by the producer organisation during the three previous years. Member States shall ensure that the compensation granted for market withdrawals does not exceed the market price of the withdrawn products. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4815
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate for interventions concerning market withdrawals for free distribution to 100 % for market withdrawals which do not exceed 5 % of the volume of the production marketed by a producer organisation. The volume of the production shall be calculated as the average of the overall volumes of products for which the producer organisation is recognised and which are marketed by the producer organisation during the three previous years. Member States shall ensure that the compensation granted for market withdrawals does not exceed the market price of the withdrawn products. | deleted |
Or. fr
Justification
Transferred to CMO
Amendment 4816
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate for interventions concerning market withdrawals for free distribution to 100 % for market withdrawals which do not exceed 5 % of the volume of the production marketed by a producer organisation. The volume of the production shall be calculated as the average of the overall volumes of products for which the producer organisation is recognised and which are marketed by the producer organisation during the three previous years. Member States shall ensure that the compensation granted for market withdrawals does not exceed the market price of the withdrawn products. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4817
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate for interventions concerning market withdrawals for free distribution to 100 % for market withdrawals which do not exceed 5 % of the volume of the production marketed by a producer organisation. The volume of the production shall be calculated as the average of the overall volumes of products for which the producer organisation is recognised and which are marketed by the producer organisation during the three previous years. Member States shall ensure that the compensation granted for market withdrawals does not exceed the market price of the withdrawn products. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4818
Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 6
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate for interventions concerning market withdrawals for free distribution to 100 % for market withdrawals which do not exceed 5 % of the volume of the production marketed by a producer organisation. The volume of the production shall be calculated as the average of the overall volumes of products for which the producer organisation is recognised and which are marketed by the producer organisation during the three previous years. Member States shall ensure that the compensation granted for market withdrawals does not exceed the market price of the withdrawn products. | By way of derogation from second subparagraph, Member States may decide to increase the maximum support rate for interventions concerning market withdrawals for free distribution to 100 % for market withdrawals which do not exceed 5 % of the volume of the production marketed by a producer organisation. The volume of the production shall be calculated as the average of the overall volumes of products for which the producer organisation is recognised and which are marketed by the producer organisation during the three previous years. Member States shall ensure that the compensation granted for market withdrawals does not exceed the market price of the withdrawn products. By way of derogation from the first and second sub-paragraph, Member States shall cover up to 50% of the eligible costs for interventions in Article 31 points (a), (b), (c), (zg), (h), (l), (p), (s), (w), (z), (zd) and (ze) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 in the wine sector. The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 point (zc) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 100% of the eligible costs. The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 points (fa) and (za) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 80% of eligible expenditure and 90% for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC active in the wine sector, for cooperatives composed of the same micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, and for producers organisations recognised under Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. The financial assistance for investments referred to in Article 31 point (a) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may be increased to up to 80% of eligible costs for actions linked to the objective of contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation and to the improvement of the sustainability of production systems and the reduction of the environmental impact of the Union wine sector. The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31 points (i) and (a) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover 80% of the eligible costs in the wine sector. The financial assistance for permanent grubbing up referred to in Article 31 point (zb) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 shall not exceed 70% of the sum of the direct costs of operating the grubbing up and the estimated loss of revenue incurred during the calendar of one year for the grubbed-up area following the grubbing up. In addition, Member States may provide a national contribution to the intervention of up to 30 % of the sum of the direct costs of operating the grubbing up and the estimated loss of revenue incurred during the calendar of one year for the area grubbed up following the grubbing up. The financial assistance for temporary withdrawal referred to in Article 31 points (zf) of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 80% of the eligible costs for actions linked to the vineyard parcels itself and maintenance of vineyard parcels and their preservation in good agricultural and environmental condition as well as biodiversity measures. Member States may provide a national contribution to this intervention of up to 20 % of the sum of the eligible costs. |
Or. en
Amendment 4819
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Subject to compliance with Article 20(4), the Union financial assistance to be granted to recognised producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups implementing interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be limited to: | deleted |
| (a) 4.1% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; | |
| (b) 4.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; | |
| (c) 5% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. | |
| Those limits may be increased by 0,5 percentage points, where the operational programme comprises one or more interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, provided the amount in excess of the relevant percentage set out in the first subparagraph, points (a), (b) or (c), is used solely to finance expenditure related to the implementation of these interventions. | |
| Member States shall establish in their NRP Plans rules relating to the calculation of the support for distillation of by-products of wine, ensuring a fair compensation to both distillers and wine producers. | |
| If Member States establish in their NRP Plans that the entities referred to in Article 32(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 may be beneficiaries of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of that Regulation, Member States shall also provide support for the setting-up of producer organisations in accordance with Article74 [cooperation] in addition to the support provided for the implementation of the intervention. | |
| The Union financial assistance and national contribution to each intervention in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall together not exceed 100 % of actual costs of the intervention. |
Or. fr
Justification
Transferred to CMO
Amendment 4820
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Subject to compliance with Article 20(4), the Union financial assistance to be granted to recognised producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups implementing interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be limited to: | deleted |
| (a) 4.1% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; | |
| (b) 4.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; | |
| (c) 5% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. | |
| Those limits may be increased by 0,5 percentage points, where the operational programme comprises one or more interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, provided the amount in excess of the relevant percentage set out in the first subparagraph, points (a), (b) or (c), is used solely to finance expenditure related to the implementation of these interventions. | |
| Member States shall establish in their NRP Plans rules relating to the calculation of the support for distillation of by-products of wine, ensuring a fair compensation to both distillers and wine producers. | |
| If Member States establish in their NRP Plans that the entities referred to in Article 32(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 may be beneficiaries of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of that Regulation, Member States shall also provide support for the setting-up of producer organisations in accordance with Article74 [cooperation] in addition to the support provided for the implementation of the intervention. | |
| The Union financial assistance and national contribution to each intervention in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall together not exceed 100 % of actual costs of the intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4821
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Subject to compliance with Article 20(4), the Union financial assistance to be granted to recognised producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups implementing interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be limited to: | deleted |
| (a) 4.1% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; | |
| (b) 4.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; | |
| (c) 5% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. | |
| Those limits may be increased by 0,5 percentage points, where the operational programme comprises one or more interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, provided the amount in excess of the relevant percentage set out in the first subparagraph, points (a), (b) or (c), is used solely to finance expenditure related to the implementation of these interventions. | |
| Member States shall establish in their NRP Plans rules relating to the calculation of the support for distillation of by-products of wine, ensuring a fair compensation to both distillers and wine producers. | |
| If Member States establish in their NRP Plans that the entities referred to in Article 32(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 may be beneficiaries of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of that Regulation, Member States shall also provide support for the setting-up of producer organisations in accordance with Article74 [cooperation] in addition to the support provided for the implementation of the intervention. | |
| The Union financial assistance and national contribution to each intervention in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall together not exceed 100 % of actual costs of the intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4822
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Subject to compliance with Article 20(4), the Union financial assistance to be granted to recognised producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups implementing interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be limited to: | deleted |
| (a) 4.1% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; | |
| (b) 4.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; | |
| (c) 5% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. | |
| Those limits may be increased by 0,5 percentage points, where the operational programme comprises one or more interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, provided the amount in excess of the relevant percentage set out in the first subparagraph, points (a), (b) or (c), is used solely to finance expenditure related to the implementation of these interventions. | |
| Member States shall establish in their NRP Plans rules relating to the calculation of the support for distillation of by-products of wine, ensuring a fair compensation to both distillers and wine producers. | |
| If Member States establish in their NRP Plans that the entities referred to in Article 32(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 may be beneficiaries of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of that Regulation, Member States shall also provide support for the setting-up of producer organisations in accordance with Article74 [cooperation] in addition to the support provided for the implementation of the intervention. | |
| The Union financial assistance and national contribution to each intervention in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall together not exceed 100 % of actual costs of the intervention. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4823
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Subject to compliance with Article 20(4), the Union financial assistance to be granted to recognised producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or identified producer groups implementing interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be limited to: | deleted |
| (a) 4.1% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; | |
| (b) 4.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; | |
| (c) 5% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. |
Or. fr
Amendment 4824
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) 4.1% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4825
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) 4.1% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; | (a) 6 % of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; |
Or. en
Justification
There is a need to increase the amount of support that producer organizations, their associations, and inter-branch organizations can receive in connection with the implementation of operational programs interventions in certain sectors. The values proposed by the European Commission are too low and duplicate solutions from the 2014-2020 period. It is necessary to adapt the values applicable for the 2023-2027 period and unifying the level of support for all sectors. Support through sectoral interventions is one of the important mechanisms influencing the level of producer organization. Raising this level is necessary because, through organization, producers increase their competitiveness and strengthen their position in the market. Therefore, the attractiveness of the support mechanism must be increased.
Amendment 4826
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) 4.1% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; | (a) 6% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation; |
Or. en
Justification
There is a need to increase the amount of support that producer organizations, their associations, and inter-branch organizations can receive in connection with the implementation of operational programs interventions in certain sectors. The values proposed by the European Commission are too low and duplicate solutions from the 2014-2020 period. We propose adopting the values applicable for the 2023-2027 period and unifying the level of support for all sectors. Support through sectoral interventions is one of the important mechanisms influencing the level of producer organization. Raising this level is necessary because, through organization, producers increase their competitiveness and strengthen their position in the market.
Amendment 4827
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) 4.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4828
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) 4.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; | (b) 6.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; |
Or. en
Amendment 4829
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) 4.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; | (b) 6.5% of the value of marketed production of each association of producer organisations; |
Or. en
Justification
There is a need to increase the amount of support that producer organizations, their associations, and inter-branch organizations can receive in connection with the implementation of operational programs interventions in certain sectors. The values proposed by the European Commission are too low and duplicate solutions from the 2014-2020 period. It is necessary to adapt the values applicable for the 2023-2027 period and unifying the level of support for all sectors. Support through sectoral interventions is one of the important mechanisms influencing the level of producer organization. Raising this level is necessary because, through organization, producers increase their competitiveness and strengthen their position in the market. Therefore, the attractiveness of the support mechanism must be increased.
Amendment 4830
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) 5% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4831
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) 5% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. | (c) 7% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. |
Or. en
Amendment 4832
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) 5% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. | (c) 7% of the value of marketed production of each transnational producer organisation or transnational association of producer organisations. |
Or. en
Justification
There is a need to increase the amount of support that producer organizations, their associations, and inter-branch organizations can receive in connection with the implementation of operational programs interventions in certain sectors. The values proposed by the European Commission are too low and duplicate solutions from the 2014-2020 period. It is necessary to adapt the values applicable for the 2023-2027 period and unifying the level of support for all sectors. Support through sectoral interventions is one of the important mechanisms influencing the level of producer organization. Raising this level is necessary because, through organization, producers increase their competitiveness and strengthen their position in the market. Therefore, the attractiveness of the support mechanism must be increased.
Amendment 4833
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Those limits may be increased by 0,5 percentage points, where the operational programme comprises one or more interventions linked to generational renewal, research and innovation, risk management or environment and climate, provided the amount in excess of the relevant percentage set out in the first subparagraph, points (a), (b) or (c), is used solely to finance expenditure related to the implementation of these interventions. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4834
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 3
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall establish in their NRP Plans rules relating to the calculation of the support for distillation of by-products of wine, ensuring a fair compensation to both distillers and wine producers. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4835
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 4
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| If Member States establish in their NRP Plans that the entities referred to in Article 32(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 may be beneficiaries of the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of that Regulation, Member States shall also provide support for the setting-up of producer organisations in accordance with Article74 [cooperation] in addition to the support provided for the implementation of the intervention. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4836
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 5
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Union financial assistance and national contribution to each intervention in certain sectors referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall together not exceed 100 % of actual costs of the intervention. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4837
Esther Herranz García, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Maravillas Abadía Jover
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 9 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9a. By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, Member States shall cover up to 50 % of the eligible costs for interventions listed in Article 31, points (a), (b), (c), (e), (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (o), (r), (v) and (w), of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 in the wine sector. The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31, point (u), of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 100 % of the eligible costs. The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31, points (d) and (s), of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 80 % of eligible expenditure and up to 90 % for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, and which are active in the wine sector. The financial assistance for investments referred to in Article 31, point (a), of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may be increased to up to 80 % of eligible costs for actions linked to the objective of contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation, and to the improvement of the sustainability of production systems and the reduction of the environmental impact of the Union wine sector. The financial assistance for actions referred to in Article 31, points (f) and (g), of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover 80 % of the eligible costs. The financial assistance for permanent grubbing up referred to in Article 31, point (t), of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 shall not exceed 70 % of the sum of the direct costs of the grubbing-up operation and the estimated loss of revenue incurred on the grubbed-up area during the calendar year following the grubbing up. In addition, Member States may provide a national contribution to the intervention of up to 30 % of the sum of the direct costs of the grubbing-up operation and the estimated loss of revenue on the grubbed-up area during the calendar year following the grubbing up. The financial assistance for temporary withdrawal referred to in Article 31, point (x), of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013 may cover up to 80 % of the eligible costs for actions linked to the vineyard parcels themselves, their maintenance and their preservation in good agricultural and environmental condition, as well as biodiversity measures. Member States may provide a national contribution to the intervention of up to 20 % of the sum of the eligible costs. |
Or. es
Amendment 4838
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 10
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Support for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 may only be provided under the conditions laid down in this Title. Any amount relative to claim year 2027 set out in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as well as claims related to types of interventions referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2021/215, claims related to Regulations (EU) 228/2013 and 229/2013 shall be counted as part of -budgetary commitments- for the financial year 2028 as laid down in Article 14(1), point(a). | deleted |
| By derogation from Article 23(7) of this Regulation, the financing decision within the meaning of Article 110 of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 may be adopted for the amount referred to in the first sub-paragraph and the amount may be committed and paid before the adoption of the implementing decision referred to in Article 23(6) of this regulation. |
Or. en
Justification
Transferred to the CAP Regulation (2025/0241 COD)
Amendment 4839
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Support for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 may only be provided under the conditions laid down in this Title. Any amount relative to claim year 2027 set out in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as well as claims related to types of interventions referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2021/215, claims related to Regulations (EU) 228/2013 and 229/2013 shall be counted as part of -budgetary commitments- for the financial year 2028 as laid down in Article 14(1), point(a). | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4840
Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo, Rosa Serrano Sierra
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Support for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 may only be provided under the conditions laid down in this Title. Any amount relative to claim year 2027 set out in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as well as claims related to types of interventions referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2021/215, claims related to Regulations (EU) 228/2013 and 229/2013 shall be counted as part of -budgetary commitments- for the financial year 2028 as laid down in Article 14(1), point(a). | Support for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 may only be provided under the conditions laid down in this Title. Any amount relative to claim year 2027 or earlier years as set out in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as well as claims related to types of interventions referred to in Articles 16 and 69 of Regulation (EU) 2021/215, claims related to Regulations (EU) 228/2013 and 229/2013 shall be counted as part of -budgetary commitments- for the financial year 2028 as laid down in Article 14(1), point(a) in which the payment of the Commission is made to the Member State. |
Or. en
Amendment 4841
Daniel Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Support for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 may only be provided under the conditions laid down in this Title. Any amount relative to claim year 2027 set out in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as well as claims related to types of interventions referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2021/215, claims related to Regulations (EU) 228/2013 and 229/2013 shall be counted as part of -budgetary commitments- for the financial year 2028 as laid down in Article 14(1), point(a). | Support for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 may only be provided under the conditions laid down in this Title. Any amount relative to claims set out in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as well as claims related to types of interventions referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2021/215, claims related to Regulations (EU) 228/2013 and 229/2013 shall be counted as part of -budgetary commitments- for the duration of the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 as laid down in Article 14(1), point(a). |
Or. ro
Amendment 4842
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Support for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 may only be provided under the conditions laid down in this Title. Any amount relative to claim year 2027 set out in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as well as claims related to types of interventions referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2021/215, claims related to Regulations (EU) 228/2013 and 229/2013 shall be counted as part of -budgetary commitments- for the financial year 2028 as laid down in Article 14(1), point(a). | Support for the interventions referred to in paragraph 1 may only be provided under the conditions laid down in this Title. Any amount relative to claim year 2027 set out in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as well as claims related to types of interventions referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, claims related to Regulations (EU) 228/2013 and 229/2013 shall be counted as part of -budgetary commitments- for the financial year 2028 as laid down in Article 14(1), point(a). |
Or. en
Amendment 4843
Céline Imart, Nina Carberry, Isabelle Le Callennec, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By derogation from Article 23(7) of this Regulation, the financing decision within the meaning of Article 110 of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 may be adopted for the amount referred to in the first sub-paragraph and the amount may be committed and paid before the adoption of the implementing decision referred to in Article 23(6) of this regulation. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 4844
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sebastian Everding
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Interventions of the Common Fisheries Policy include | deleted |
| (a) support for sustainable fisheries and the restoration and conservation of aquatic biological resources, energy transition of fisheries and aquaculture as well as actions improving safety; | |
| (b) support for the innovation for more selective fishing activities and for the conservation, protection and restoration of aquatic biodiversity and ecosystems; | |
| (c) support for the Common Market Organisation (CMO); | |
| (d) support to fishers or aquaculture producers for the compensation to operators of the fishery and aquaculture sector for their income foregone or additional costs and compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery products listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, provided that those products are stored in accordance with Articles 30 and 31 of that Regulation. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4845
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Interventions of the Common Fisheries Policy include | deleted |
| (a) support for sustainable fisheries and the restoration and conservation of aquatic biological resources, energy transition of fisheries and aquaculture as well as actions improving safety; | |
| (b) support for the innovation for more selective fishing activities and for the conservation, protection and restoration of aquatic biodiversity and ecosystems; | |
| (c) support for the Common Market Organisation (CMO); | |
| (d) support to fishers or aquaculture producers for the compensation to operators of the fishery and aquaculture sector for their income foregone or additional costs and compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery products listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, provided that those products are stored in accordance with Articles 30 and 31 of that Regulation. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4846
Nina Carberry
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Interventions of the Common Fisheries Policy include | 11. Interventions under the Common Fisheries Policy, the European Ocean Pact and the Union’s maritime and aquaculture policy shall be provided for in Regulation (EU) …/… [CFP Regulation]. |
Or. en
Amendment 4847
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11. Interventions of the Common Fisheries Policy include | 11. The CFP interventions are the interventions listed in Article X [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CFP Regulation] |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4848
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) support for sustainable fisheries and the restoration and conservation of aquatic biological resources, energy transition of fisheries and aquaculture as well as actions improving safety; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4849
Tomáš Kubín
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) support for sustainable fisheries and the restoration and conservation of aquatic biological resources, energy transition of fisheries and aquaculture as well as actions improving safety; | (a) investment support for fishers and aquaculture producers, including investments that improve safety, working conditions, environmental performance and added value; support for the energy transition of fisheries and aquaculture |
Or. en
Amendment 4850
Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point a a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) support for fair and stable incomes for small-scale and coastal fishers, for generational renewal and the entry of young fishers into the profession, for the transfer of family fishing activities, and for decent working and safety conditions on board, with priority given to island, remote and fisheries-dependent communities; |
Or. en
Justification
The fisheries sector faces an acute crisis of generational renewal and of decent working conditions. Dedicated support for fair and stable incomes, for the entry of young fishers, for the transfer of family fishing activities and for safety and working conditions on board, with priority for island, remote and fisheries-dependent communities, is indispensable to keep small-scale fishing alive and to protect the people who practise it.
Amendment 4851
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) support for the innovation for more selective fishing activities and for the conservation, protection and restoration of aquatic biodiversity and ecosystems; | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4852
Tomáš Kubín, Raffaele Stancanelli
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) support for the innovation for more selective fishing activities and for the conservation, protection and restoration of aquatic biodiversity and ecosystems; | (b) support for innovation in fisheries and aquaculture, including pilot projects aimed at developing, testing or demonstrating new technologies, practices or organisational solutions; |
Or. en
Amendment 4853
Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point b a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) support for aquaculture, seafood processing, storage, cold-chain infrastructure, marketing, fish producer organisations, advisory councils, fishing ports, landing sites and harbour services; |
Or. en
Amendment 4854
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) support for the Common Market Organisation (CMO); | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4855
Tomáš Kubín
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point c
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) support for the Common Market Organisation (CMO); | (c) support for the functioning of the Common Market Organisation, including the establishment and functioning of producer organisations, the implementation of production and marketing plans and storage; |
Or. en
Amendment 4856
Tomáš Kubín
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) support to fishers or aquaculture producers for the compensation to operators of the fishery and aquaculture sector for their income foregone or additional costs and compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery products listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, provided that those products are stored in accordance with Articles 30 and 31 of that Regulation. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 4857
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) support to fishers or aquaculture producers for the compensation to operators of the fishery and aquaculture sector for their income foregone or additional costs and compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery products listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, provided that those products are stored in accordance with Articles 30 and 31 of that Regulation. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4858
Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) support to fishers or aquaculture producers for the compensation to operators of the fishery and aquaculture sector for their income foregone or additional costs and compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery products listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, provided that those products are stored in accordance with Articles 30 and 31 of that Regulation. | (d) support to fishers , aquaculture producers, seafood processors, producer organisations and associations of producer organisations for compensation for income foregone or additional costs including those arising from conservation measures, spatial restrictions, marine protected areas, loss of access, market disruption, quota changes, energy transition requirements or other obligations linked to the implementation of Union law, and compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery products listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, provided that those products are stored in accordance with Articles 30 and 31 of that Regulation; |
Or. en
Amendment 4859
Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) support under this paragraph shall preserve a level playing field between Member States and avoid distortions of competition between fishers, aquaculture producers, seafood processors and producer organisations. |
Or. en
Amendment 4860
Tomáš Kubín, Raffaele Stancanelli
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 – point d a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) support for generational renewal in fisheries and aquaculture, including measures facilitating business entry, succession and skills development |
Or. en
Amendment 4861
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 11 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 11a. support for fishers by establishing fair and appropriate compensation mechanisms for impacts arising from the creation or extension of marine protected areas to ensure a balanced and socially fair transition. |
Or. pt
Amendment 4862
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 35 paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k] and [r], and paragraph 11, payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. | deleted |
Or. en
Justification
Transferred to the CAP Regulation (2025/0241 COD)
Amendment 4863
Norbert Lins, Marion Walsmann, Stefan Köhler, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Herbert Dorfmann, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Maria Walsh, Esther Herranz García, Daniel Buda, Lena Düpont, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 35 paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k] and [r], and paragraph 11, payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. | 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 5 paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k], [r] and [i] (XXX CAP Regulation and Article X paragraph 11 (CFP Regulation), payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. |
Or. en
Amendment 4864
David Cormand, Gordan Bosanac, Damian Boeselager
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 35 paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k] and [r], and paragraph 11, payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. | 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 5, paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k] and [r], [types of support] of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. |
Or. en
Amendment 4865
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 35 paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k] and [r], and paragraph 11, payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. | 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 5 paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k] and [r] [types of support], of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4866
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 35 paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k] and [r], and paragraph 11, payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. | 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 5 paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k] and [r] [types of support], of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4867
Luis-Vicențiu Lazarus
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 35 paragraph 1, points (a) to [h] and [j], [k] and [r], and paragraph 11, payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. | 12. When determining amounts to be paid out for support provided for CAP interventions as referred to in Article 5 paragraph 1 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation], payout values shall be computed without setting aside amounts for reforms. |
Or. en
Amendment 4868
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 1 (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 35a Continuity of CAP payments |
Or. en
Amendment 4869
Carlo Fidanza
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12 – point 1 (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1) By way of derogation from the first and second subparagraph of Article 21, interventions referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 approved by a Member State for a duration extending beyond 31 December 2027, may continue to be eligible for financing until the end of the intervention provided such interventions are included in the NRP Plan and are implemented in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 and Regulation (EU) 2021/2116. |
Or. en
Justification
The transitional provisions proposed for sectoral interventions involving operational programmes should also apply to other sectoral interventions.
Amendment 4870
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12a. Types of CFP, aquaculture and fish processing interventions | |
| 1. The following types of CFP, aquaculture and fish processing interventions are set out: | |
| (a) support for a sustainable fisheries and aquaculture sector, including the restoration and conservation of aquatic biological resources, energy transition, permanent and temporary cessation of fishing activities, as well as actions improving safety, working conditions and health; | |
| (b) support for the innovation for more selective sustainable fishing activities and sustainable aquacultural activities, as well as for the conservation, protection and restoration of aquatic biodiversity and ecosystems in line with the objectives of the CFP and processing of fishery and aquaculture products; | |
| (c) support for the Common Market Organisation (CMO) as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, including the establishment and functioning of producer organisations and the implementation of production and marketing plans; | |
| (d) without prejudice to the possibility to provide crisis payments to fishers and aquaculture producers in accordance with Article 34, support to fishers or aquaculture producers for the compensation to operators of the fishery and aquaculture sector for their income foregone or additional costs and compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery products listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, provided that those products are stored in accordance with Articles 30 and 31 of that Regulation. | |
| (e) support for the implementation of the Union control system and the collection, management and use of fisheries and aquaculture data necessary for the implementation of the CFP; | |
| (f) support for fight against IUU fishing; | |
| (g) support for additional specific needs of fisheries, aquaculture and coastal communities and in particular of small-scale coastal fishing; | |
| (h) support for additional activities contributing to environmental, economic and social sustainability of fishing operations and the balance between the fishing capacity of the fleets and the available fishing opportunities; | |
| (i) support for activities set out in the CFP including the conservation of marine biological resources, the restoration of marine biodiversity, the management of and innovation in fisheries and sustainable aquaculture activities; | |
| (j) support for generational renewal in the fisheries and aquaculture sector. 2. The types of interventions referred to in paragraph 1 should be financed from the amount covered by ring-fencing referred to in Article 10(2)(a)(ii a) |
Or. en
Amendment 4871
David Cormand, Gordan Bosanac, Damian Boeselager
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 12 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 12a. At least 5 % of the total amount dedicated to rural development set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii)(b), shall be reserved for LEADER |
Or. en
Amendment 4872
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 35a | |
| CAP payments | |
| By way of derogation from Article 21(3), second subparagraph, expenditure relating to legal commitments to beneficiaries started before 1 July 2027 under the following interventions may be eligible for financing under NRP Plans provided that such expenditure is included in the NRP Plan and the interventions are implemented in accordance with the provisions set out below: | |
| (a) interventions referred to in Article 42, points (a) and (d) to (f), of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 implemented after 31 December 2027 in accordance with the applicable provisions of Title III, Chapter III of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 through operational programmes approved by a Member State for a duration extending beyond that date; | |
| (b) interventions referred to in Article 42, points (b) and (c), of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 implemented beyond 31 December 2027 in accordance with the applicable provisions of Title III, Chapter III of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115; | |
| (c) interventions referred to in Article 70 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 implemented beyond 31 December 2027 using the contribution rates established in the version of the CAP Strategic Plan in force on 31 December 2027. | |
| 1a. Member States supporting the interventions referred to in paragraph 1, point (a), in their CAP Strategic Plans shall ensure that, by [15 September 2027], producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or, where applicable, other beneficiaries referred to in Article 67(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 submit an application to the competent national authorities for approval of the carry-over of their operational programme, indicating whether: | |
| (a) the operational programme is to be modified so as to comply with Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and this Regulation; | |
| (b) the operational programme is to be replaced by a new operational programme in line with Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and this Regulation; | |
| (c) the operational programme is to continue to be implemented until its end in accordance with the applicable provisions of Title III, Chapter III of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115. | |
| Member States shall assess the request and decide whether to approve it. If no such request is submitted by [15 September 2027], the operational programmes approved under Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 shall end on 31 December 2027. | |
| 2. Where there is a significant risk of delay to the adoption of the NRP Plan after its submission by the Member State in accordance with Article 21(1), and at the latest by 31 January 2028, the Commission shall adopt a financing decision within the meaning of Article 110 of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 setting out the amounts corresponding to the year 2028 for interventions listed in Article 35(1)(a) to (g) [IACS], supported by the resources referred to in Article 10(2)(a)(ii), and interventions listed in Article 35(1)(q) [EU school scheme] provided that the obligation of ensuring the compliance of the submitted NRP Plan with all requirements laid down in this Regulation, in particular in Article 22, is fulfilled. | |
| The decision adopted under this paragraph shall be replaced by the decision under Article 23(7) once it is adopted. |
Or. pt
Amendment 4873
Cristina Maestre, Dario Nardella, André Franqueira Rodrigues, Elena Sancho Murillo, Camilla Laureti, Stefano Bonaccini, Rosa Serrano Sierra
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article35a | |
| Continuity of CAP payments | |
| 1. By way of derogation from the third paragraph of Article 21, interventions referred to in Article 42, of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, approved by a Member State for a duration extending beyond 31 December 2027, may continue to be eligible for financing until the end of the operational programmes or until the execution date specified in the approved aid claim provided such interventions are included in the NRCAP Plan and are implemented in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 and Regulation (EU) 2021/2116. | |
| 2. Member States financing such operational programmes under their CAP Strategic Plans shall ensure that, by 15 September 2027, producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or, where applicable, other beneficiaries as referred to in Article 67(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 submit to the competent national authorities a request for approval of the transition of their operational programme, indicating whether: | |
| (a) the operational programme is to be modified in order to comply with Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and this Regulation; or | |
| (b) the operational programmes is replaced by a new operational programme complying with Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and this Regulation; or | |
| (c) the operational programme is to continue to be implemented until its end in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 and Regulation (EU) 2021/2116. | |
| Member States shall assess the request and decide whether to approve it. If such request is no submitted by 15 September 2027, the operational programmes approved under Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 shall end on 31 December 2027. | |
| 3. Where there is a significant risk of delay for the adoption of the NRP Plan after its submission by the Member State in accordance with Article 21(1) and at the latest by 31 January 2028, the Commission shall adopt a financing decision within the meaning of Article 110 of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 setting out the amounts corresponding to the year 2028 for interventions listed in Article 5(1) points (a) to (g) of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX CAP Regulation [IACS] and for interventions referred to in Article 5(1) point (r) Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXCAP Regulation [support for interventions in certain sectors referred to in Title I, Part II, Chapter IIa, of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013], that are supported by the resources referred to in Article 10(2)(a)(ii), provided that the obligation of ensuring the compliance of the submitted NRP Plan with all requirements laid down in this Regulation, in particular in Article 22, is fulfilled. The decision adopted under this subparagraph shall be replaced by the decision under Article 23(7) once it is adopted. |
Or. en
Justification
It is essential to ensure the continuity of the measures under Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, which extend beyond 31 December 2027, not only from a financial perspective but also from a procedural one.
Amendment 4874
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 35a | |
| Types of CFP, aquaculture and fish processing interventions | |
| 1. The following types of CFP, aquaculture and fish processing interventions are set out: | |
| (a) support for a sustainable fisheries and aquaculture sector, including the restoration and conservation of aquatic biological resources, energy transition, permanent and temporary cessation of fishing activities, as well as actions improving safety, working conditions and health; | |
| (b) support for the innovation for more selective sustainable fishing activities and sustainable aquacultural activities, as well as for the conservation, protection and restoration of aquatic biodiversity and ecosystems in line with the objectives of the CFP and processing of fishery and aquaculture products; | |
| (c) support for the Common Market Organisation (CMO) as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, including the establishment and functioning of producer organisations and the implementation of production and marketing plans; | |
| (d) without prejudice to the possibility to provide crisis payments to fishers and aquaculture producers in accordance with Article 34, support to fishers or aquaculture producers for the compensation to operators of the fishery and aquaculture sector for their income foregone or additional costs and compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producer organisations which store fishery products listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, provided that those products are stored in accordance with Articles 30 and 31 of that Regulation; | |
| (e) support for the implementation of the Union control system and the collection, management and use of fisheries and aquaculture data necessary for the implementation of the CFP; | |
| (f) support for fight against IUU fishing; | |
| (g) support for additional specific needs of fisheries, aquaculture and coastal communities and in particular of small-scale coastal fishing; | |
| (h) support for additional activities contributing to environmental, economic and social sustainability of fishing operations and the balance between the fishing capacity of the fleets and the available fishing opportunities; | |
| (i) support for activities set out in the CFP including the conservation of marine biological resources, the restoration of marine biodiversity, the management of and innovation in fisheries and sustainable aquaculture activities; | |
| (j) support for generational renewal in the fisheries and aquaculture sector. | |
| 2. The types of interventions referred to in paragraph 1 should be financed from the amount covered by ring-fencing referred to in Article 10(2)(a)(ii a) [see Amendment 04] |
Or. en
Justification
The scope of intervention described in Article 35(11) of the draft proposal COM(2025) 565 is too narrow because it does not address many issues important for the implementation of the CFP, such as control and enforcement of CFP regulations, collection of fisheries data, and the needs of the aquaculture industry and fish product processing. To maintain the legibility of the regulations, there is a need to separate the provisions relating to the CFP and the CFP within Title V
Amendment 4875
André Franqueira Rodrigues
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 35a | |
| Continuity of CAP payments | |
| By way of derogation from Article 21(3), second subparagraph, expenditure relating to legal commitments to beneficiaries taken on before 1 July 2027 under CAP interventions may be eligible for financing under NRP Plans provided that it is included in the NRP Plan and is in line with the applicable rules. Where there is a significant risk of delay in the adoption of a Plan after it has been submitted by the Member State, the Commission shall adopt a financing decision ensuring the income support interventions, school scheme and other interventions necessary continue in 2028 to prevent interruptions in payments to beneficiaries. |
Or. pt
Justification
This ensures CAP payments continue and prevents disruption in 2028.
Amendment 4876
Ivan David, Volker Schnurrbusch
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article35a | |
| Flexibility between direct payment allocations and rural development allocations | |
| 1. As part of its CAP chapter as referred to in Article 22(2), point (ca), a Member State may decide to transfer: | |
| (a) up to 10 % of its allocation for income support set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii)(a), to its allocation for rural development as set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii)(b) of this Regulation in 2028 to 2034; or | |
| (b) up to 10 % of its allocation for rural development as set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii)(b), to its allocation for income support set out in Article 10(2), point (a)(ii)(a), of this Regulation in 2028 to 2034 |
Or. en
Justification
Limiting the level of flexibility between direct payments and rural development allocations would contribute to greater predictability, stability and continuity of support for beneficiaries throughout the programming period. A more balanced transfer mechanism would also help preserve the original policy objectives and financial structure of both pillars of the CAP, while still providing Member States with sufficient flexibility to address specific national needs and changing circumstances.
Amendment 4877
Norbert Lins, Marion Walsmann, Stefan Köhler, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Herbert Dorfmann, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Maria Walsh, Daniel Buda, Lena Düpont
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article35a | |
| Flexibility between direct payment allocations and rural development allocations | |
| 1. As part of its CAP chapter as referred to in Article 22(2)(ca), a Member State may decide to transfer: | |
| (a) up to 25 % of its allocation for income support set out in Article 10(2)(a)(ii)(a), to its allocation for rural development as set out in Article 10(2)(a)(ii)(b) of this Regulation in 2028 to 2034; | |
| or | |
| (b) up to 10 % of its allocation for rural development as set out in Article 10(2)(a)(ii)(b) to its allocation for income support set out in Article 10(2)(a)(ii)(a) of this Regulation in 2028 to 2034. |
Or. en
Amendment 4878
Danuše Nerudová
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 35a | |
| Prevention of excessive concentration of agricultural land and public support | |
| 1. Member States shall ensure that support under the agricultural chapter primarily benefits active farmers operating small and medium-sized holdings. | |
| 2.Member States shall take measures to avoid excessive concentration of Union support among large agricultural holdings and shall prioritise support for family farms, young farmers, new farmers and farms located in disadvantaged rural areas. |
Or. en
Amendment 4879
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 36 | deleted |
| Specific requirements for CAP interventions | |
| 1. Member States shall provide for each intervention in their Plans: | |
| (a) the type of intervention on which it is based, the territorial scope and the type of area targeted by the intervention; | |
| (b) where applicable, sectors targeted by the intervention or group of farmers or other beneficiaries targeted under the intervention, CAP environment and climate priority area, in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]; | |
| (c) An explanation of the relevant criteria of Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture as referred to in Article 40 [WTO domestic support] and in Annex XVII [WTO annex]; | |
| (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP]; | |
| (e) a description of farming practices covered by the intervention based on the Joint Research Centre classification of farming practices in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. | |
| (f) in relation to the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Part II, Title I, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, justification for targeting the selected sectors and complementarity with other CAP interventions, and where relevant, with other measures set out in the Plan; | |
| 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. The support shall be limited to [EUR 200 000] per farmer per programming period of the Plan. | |
| 3. Where public support granted under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] for an investment operation does not exceed EUR 100 000 and is not subject to rules on public procurement, that support shall take the form of standard scales of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4880
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 36 | deleted |
| Specific requirements for CAP interventions | |
| 1. Member States shall provide for each intervention in their Plans: | |
| (a) the type of intervention on which it is based, the territorial scope and the type of area targeted by the intervention; | |
| (b) where applicable, sectors targeted by the intervention or group of farmers or other beneficiaries targeted under the intervention, CAP environment and climate priority area, in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]; | |
| (c) An explanation of the relevant criteria of Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture as referred to in Article 40 [WTO domestic support] and in Annex XVII [WTO annex]; | |
| (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP]; | |
| (e) a description of farming practices covered by the intervention based on the Joint Research Centre classification of farming practices in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. | |
| (f) in relation to the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Part II, Title I, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, justification for targeting the selected sectors and complementarity with other CAP interventions, and where relevant, with other measures set out in the Plan; | |
| 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. The support shall be limited to [EUR 200 000] per farmer per programming period of the Plan. | |
| 3. Where public support granted under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] for an investment operation does not exceed EUR 100 000 and is not subject to rules on public procurement, that support shall take the form of standard scales of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates. |
Or. en
Amendment 4881
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 36 | deleted |
| Specific requirements for CAP interventions | |
| 1. Member States shall provide for each intervention in their Plans: | |
| (a) the type of intervention on which it is based, the territorial scope and the type of area targeted by the intervention; | |
| (b) where applicable, sectors targeted by the intervention or group of farmers or other beneficiaries targeted under the intervention, CAP environment and climate priority area, in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]; | |
| (c) An explanation of the relevant criteria of Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture as referred to in Article 40 [WTO domestic support] and in Annex XVII [WTO annex]; | |
| (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP]; | |
| (e) a description of farming practices covered by the intervention based on the Joint Research Centre classification of farming practices in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. | |
| (f) in relation to the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Part II, Title I, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, justification for targeting the selected sectors and complementarity with other CAP interventions, and where relevant, with other measures set out in the Plan; | |
| 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. The support shall be limited to [EUR 200 000] per farmer per programming period of the Plan. | |
| 3. Where public support granted under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] for an investment operation does not exceed EUR 100 000 and is not subject to rules on public procurement, that support shall take the form of standard scales of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4882
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 36 | deleted |
| Specific requirements for CAP interventions | |
| 1. Member States shall provide for each intervention in their Plans: | |
| (a) the type of intervention on which it is based, the territorial scope and the type of area targeted by the intervention; | |
| (b) where applicable, sectors targeted by the intervention or group of farmers or other beneficiaries targeted under the intervention, CAP environment and climate priority area, in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]; | |
| (c) An explanation of the relevant criteria of Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture as referred to in Article 40 [WTO domestic support] and in Annex XVII [WTO annex]; | |
| (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP]; | |
| (e) a description of farming practices covered by the intervention based on the Joint Research Centre classification of farming practices in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. | |
| (f) in relation to the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Part II, Title I, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, justification for targeting the selected sectors and complementarity with other CAP interventions, and where relevant, with other measures set out in the Plan; | |
| 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. The support shall be limited to [EUR 200 000] per farmer per programming period of the Plan. | |
| 3. Where public support granted under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] for an investment operation does not exceed EUR 100 000 and is not subject to rules on public procurement, that support shall take the form of standard scales of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates. |
Or. en
Justification
Provisions related to CAP should be transferred to Regulation (EU) 202/XXXX [CAP Regulation].
Amendment 4883
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 36 | deleted |
| Specific requirements for CAP interventions | |
| 1. Member States shall provide for each intervention in their Plans: | |
| (a) the type of intervention on which it is based, the territorial scope and the type of area targeted by the intervention; | |
| (b) where applicable, sectors targeted by the intervention or group of farmers or other beneficiaries targeted under the intervention, CAP environment and climate priority area, in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]; | |
| (c) An explanation of the relevant criteria of Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture as referred to in Article 40 [WTO domestic support] and in Annex XVII [WTO annex]; | |
| (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP]; | |
| (e) a description of farming practices covered by the intervention based on the Joint Research Centre classification of farming practices in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. | |
| (f) in relation to the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Part II, Title I, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, justification for targeting the selected sectors and complementarity with other CAP interventions, and where relevant, with other measures set out in the Plan; | |
| 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. The support shall be limited to [EUR 200 000] per farmer per programming period of the Plan. | |
| 3. Where public support granted under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] for an investment operation does not exceed EUR 100 000 and is not subject to rules on public procurement, that support shall take the form of standard scales of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates. |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4884
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 36 | deleted |
| Specific requirements for CAP interventions | |
| 1. Member States shall provide for each intervention in their Plans: | |
| (a) the type of intervention on which it is based, the territorial scope and the type of area targeted by the intervention; | |
| (b) where applicable, sectors targeted by the intervention or group of farmers or other beneficiaries targeted under the intervention, CAP environment and climate priority area, in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]; | |
| (c) An explanation of the relevant criteria of Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture as referred to in Article 40 [WTO domestic support] and in Annex XVII [WTO annex]; | |
| (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP]; | |
| (e) a description of farming practices covered by the intervention based on the Joint Research Centre classification of farming practices in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation]. | |
| (f) in relation to the interventions in certain sectors referred to in Part II, Title I, Chapter IIa of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, justification for targeting the selected sectors and complementarity with other CAP interventions, and where relevant, with other measures set out in the Plan; | |
| 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. The support shall be limited to [EUR 200 000] per farmer per programming period of the Plan. | |
| 3. Where public support granted under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] for an investment operation does not exceed EUR 100 000 and is not subject to rules on public procurement, that support shall take the form of standard scales of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4885
Sebastian Everding
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP]; | (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP], including the eligibility criteria, agri-environmental and climate actions, and animal welfare measures, the expected quantified impacts on climate, biodiversity, soil, water, and animal welfare and the indicators used to assess these impacts. |
Or. en
Amendment 4886
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point d
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP]; | (d) A description of the design of the intervention, including the eligibility conditions, and for agri-environmental and climate actions and forest-environment actions referred to in Article 10 of Regulation XX [CAP]; |
Or. en
Amendment 4887
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. The support shall be limited to [EUR 200 000] per farmer per programming period of the Plan. | 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. |
Or. pl
Amendment 4888
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. The support shall be limited to [EUR 200 000] per farmer per programming period of the Plan. | 2. Member States shall determine the amount of support for transition actions referred to in Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [CAP Regulation] based on cost estimates set out in the transition plans. The support shall be limited to [EUR 280 000] per farmer per programming period of the Plan. |
Or. en
Justification
The transition action plan could be a key tool for farmers who wish to change their practices but face burden of the high initial investment, therefore the support for such action should be higher.
Amendment 4889
Waldemar Buda, Bogdan Rzońca
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. In the implementation of CAP interventions, food security, agricultural productivity and farmers’ economic viability shall be given due priority where environmental, climate and production objectives are in conflict. |
Or. en
Amendment 4890
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 37 | deleted |
| Monitoring of agricultural resources | |
| The Fund may support actions taken by the Commission through remote-sensing applications used for the monitoring of agricultural resources, which shall aim to give the Commission the means to: | |
| (a) manage Union agricultural markets in a global context; | |
| (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, biodiversity, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; | |
| (c) share the access to the estimates referred to in point (b) in an international context, such as the initiatives coordinated by United Nations organisations, including the constitution of greenhouse gas inventories under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or other international agencies; | |
| (d) contribute to specific measures increasing the transparency of world markets, taking account of Union objectives and commitments; | |
| (e) ensure technological follow-up of the agri-meteorological system. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4891
Krzysztof Hetman, Andrzej Buła, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 37 | deleted |
| Monitoring of agricultural resources | |
| The Fund may support actions taken by the Commission through remote-sensing applications used for the monitoring of agricultural resources, which shall aim to give the Commission the means to: | |
| (a) manage Union agricultural markets in a global context; | |
| (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, biodiversity, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; | |
| (c) share the access to the estimates referred to in point (b) in an international context, such as the initiatives coordinated by United Nations organisations, including the constitution of greenhouse gas inventories under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or other international agencies; | |
| (d) contribute to specific measures increasing the transparency of world markets, taking account of Union objectives and commitments; | |
| (e) ensure technological follow-up of the agri-meteorological system. |
Or. en
Justification
Provisions related to CAP should be transferred to Regulation (EU) 202/XXXX [CAP Regulation].
Amendment 4892
Csaba Dömötör
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 37 | deleted |
| Monitoring of agricultural resources | |
| The Fund may support actions taken by the Commission through remote-sensing applications used for the monitoring of agricultural resources, which shall aim to give the Commission the means to: | |
| (a) manage Union agricultural markets in a global context; | |
| (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, biodiversity, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; | |
| (c) share the access to the estimates referred to in point (b) in an international context, such as the initiatives coordinated by United Nations organisations, including the constitution of greenhouse gas inventories under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or other international agencies; | |
| (d) contribute to specific measures increasing the transparency of world markets, taking account of Union objectives and commitments; | |
| (e) ensure technological follow-up of the agri-meteorological system. |
Or. en
Amendment 4893
Jan Farský
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 37 | deleted |
| Monitoring of agricultural resources | |
| The Fund may support actions taken by the Commission through remote-sensing applications used for the monitoring of agricultural resources, which shall aim to give the Commission the means to: | |
| (a) manage Union agricultural markets in a global context; | |
| (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, biodiversity, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; | |
| (c) share the access to the estimates referred to in point (b) in an international context, such as the initiatives coordinated by United Nations organisations, including the constitution of greenhouse gas inventories under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or other international agencies; | |
| (d) contribute to specific measures increasing the transparency of world markets, taking account of Union objectives and commitments; | |
| (e) ensure technological follow-up of the agri-meteorological system. |
Or. en
Justification
Transfer of provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) based on the letter from Commission President von der Leyen dated 9 November 2025.
Amendment 4894
Ivan David
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 37 | deleted |
| Monitoring of agricultural resources | |
| The Fund may support actions taken by the Commission through remote-sensing applications used for the monitoring of agricultural resources, which shall aim to give the Commission the means to: | |
| (a) manage Union agricultural markets in a global context; | |
| (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, biodiversity, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; | |
| (c) share the access to the estimates referred to in point (b) in an international context, such as the initiatives coordinated by United Nations organisations, including the constitution of greenhouse gas inventories under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or other international agencies; | |
| (d) contribute to specific measures increasing the transparency of world markets, taking account of Union objectives and commitments; | |
| (e) ensure technological follow-up of the agri-meteorological system. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation.
Amendment 4895
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 37 | deleted |
| Monitoring of agricultural resources | |
| The Fund may support actions taken by the Commission through remote-sensing applications used for the monitoring of agricultural resources, which shall aim to give the Commission the means to: | |
| (a) manage Union agricultural markets in a global context; | |
| (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, biodiversity, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; | |
| (c) share the access to the estimates referred to in point (b) in an international context, such as the initiatives coordinated by United Nations organisations, including the constitution of greenhouse gas inventories under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or other international agencies; | |
| (d) contribute to specific measures increasing the transparency of world markets, taking account of Union objectives and commitments; | |
| (e) ensure technological follow-up of the agri-meteorological system. |
Or. en
Amendment 4896
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 37 | deleted |
| Monitoring of agricultural resources | |
| The Fund may support actions taken by the Commission through remote-sensing applications used for the monitoring of agricultural resources, which shall aim to give the Commission the means to: | |
| (a) manage Union agricultural markets in a global context; | |
| (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, biodiversity, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; | |
| (c) share the access to the estimates referred to in point (b) in an international context, such as the initiatives coordinated by United Nations organisations, including the constitution of greenhouse gas inventories under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or other international agencies; | |
| (d) contribute to specific measures increasing the transparency of world markets, taking account of Union objectives and commitments; | |
| (e) ensure technological follow-up of the agri-meteorological system. |
Or. en
Justification
As a result of the COP endorsement on 23 April 2026 to transfer certain provisions from the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) Regulation to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Regulation, to the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation and to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation
Amendment 4897
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – title
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Monitoring of agricultural resources | Monitoring of agricultural and forest resources |
Or. en
Amendment 4898
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Fund may support actions taken by the Commission through remote-sensing applications used for the monitoring of agricultural resources, which shall aim to give the Commission the means to: | The Fund may support actions taken by the Commission through remote-sensing applications and in situ monitoring used for the monitoring of agricultural, and where applicable, forest resources, which shall aim to give the Commission the means to: |
Or. en
Amendment 4899
Maria Grapini
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point a
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) manage Union agricultural markets in a global context; | (a) manage Union agricultural markets in a global context, to ensure food security; |
Or. ro
Amendment 4900
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, biodiversity, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; | (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, wetlands and peatlands and forest-environment including old-growth forests and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, surface and groundwater water quality and changes in ecological flow and hydrological functioning, biodiversity, emissions, agricultural landscapes, including landscape features and agricultural and forest land, so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields, increments and production and impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience, including water resilience, of agricultural, and forest systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant Union legislation and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; |
Or. en
Amendment 4901
Waldemar Buda, Bogdan Rzońca
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, including agro-forestry, and monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, biodiversity, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; | (b) ensure agri-economic and agri-environmental-climate monitoring of agricultural land use and agricultural land use change, monitoring of the condition of soil, crops, water, agricultural landscapes and agricultural land so as to enable estimates to be made, in particular as regards yields and agricultural production and agricultural impacts associated with exceptional circumstances, and to enable the assessment of the resilience of agricultural systems and progress towards the achievement of the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; |
Or. en
Amendment 4902
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point e
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) ensure technological follow-up of the agri-meteorological system. | (e) ensure technological follow-up of the agri-meteorological and, where applicable, forest-meteorological system. |
Or. en