amendment list, 23 June 2026
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509
Document CJ71-AM-790090 · (COM(2025)0565 – C100179/2025 – 2025/0240(COD))
Committee on Budgets Committee on Regional Development Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
Full text
Jump to an amendment (172)
- Amendment 844
- Amendment 845
- Amendment 846
- Amendment 847
- Amendment 848
- Amendment 849
- Amendment 850
- Amendment 851
- Amendment 852
- Amendment 853
- Amendment 854
- Amendment 855
- Amendment 856
- Amendment 857
- Amendment 858
- Amendment 859
- Amendment 860
- Amendment 861
- Amendment 862
- Amendment 863
- Amendment 864
- Amendment 865
- Amendment 866
- Amendment 867
- Amendment 868
- Amendment 869
- Amendment 870
- Amendment 871
- Amendment 872
- Amendment 873
- Amendment 874
- Amendment 875
- Amendment 876
- Amendment 877
- Amendment 878
- Amendment 879
- Amendment 880
- Amendment 881
- Amendment 882
- Amendment 883
- Amendment 884
- Amendment 885
- Amendment 886
- Amendment 887
- Amendment 888
- Amendment 889
- Amendment 890
- Amendment 891
- Amendment 892
- Amendment 893
- Amendment 894
- Amendment 895
- Amendment 896
- Amendment 897
- Amendment 898
- Amendment 899
- Amendment 900
- Amendment 901
- Amendment 902
- Amendment 903
- Amendment 904
- Amendment 905
- Amendment 906
- Amendment 907
- Amendment 908
- Amendment 909
- Amendment 910
- Amendment 911
- Amendment 912
- Amendment 913
- Amendment 914
- Amendment 915
- Amendment 916
- Amendment 917
- Amendment 918
- Amendment 919
- Amendment 920
- Amendment 921
- Amendment 922
- Amendment 923
- Amendment 924
- Amendment 925
- Amendment 926
- Amendment 927
- Amendment 928
- Amendment 929
- Amendment 930
- Amendment 931
- Amendment 932
- Amendment 933
- Amendment 934
- Amendment 935
- Amendment 936
- Amendment 937
- Amendment 938
- Amendment 939
- Amendment 940
- Amendment 941
- Amendment 942
- Amendment 943
- Amendment 944
- Amendment 945
- Amendment 946
- Amendment 947
- Amendment 948
- Amendment 949
- Amendment 950
- Amendment 951
- Amendment 952
- Amendment 953
- Amendment 954
- Amendment 955
- Amendment 956
- Amendment 957
- Amendment 958
- Amendment 959
- Amendment 960
- Amendment 961
- Amendment 962
- Amendment 963
- Amendment 964
- Amendment 965
- Amendment 966
- Amendment 967
- Amendment 968
- Amendment 969
- Amendment 970
- Amendment 971
- Amendment 972
- Amendment 973
- Amendment 974
- Amendment 975
- Amendment 976
- Amendment 977
- Amendment 978
- Amendment 979
- Amendment 980
- Amendment 981
- Amendment 982
- Amendment 983
- Amendment 984
- Amendment 985
- Amendment 986
- Amendment 987
- Amendment 988
- Amendment 989
- Amendment 990
- Amendment 991
- Amendment 992
- Amendment 993
- Amendment 994
- Amendment 995
- Amendment 996
- Amendment 997
- Amendment 998
- Amendment 999
- Amendment 1000
- Amendment 1001
- Amendment 1002
- Amendment 1003
- Amendment 1004
- Amendment 1005
- Amendment 1006
- Amendment 1007
- Amendment 1008
- Amendment 1009
- Amendment 1010
- Amendment 1011
- Amendment 1012
- Amendment 1013
- Amendment 1014
- Amendment 1015
Text 1,072 paragraphs
Amendment 844
Dick Erixon
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (26a) The performance framework referred to in Recital 26 should ensure that expenditure under this Regulation is measured by the results it delivers for taxpayers in the Member States. The indicators applied should be result- and impact-oriented: outcomes such as jobs sustained twelve months after the intervention, productive assets created, contribution to regional convergence as measured by changes in regional gross value added per capita over the programme period, and the cost-effectiveness of the action expressed as the result achieved per euro disbursed; output-based milestones and targets should be secondary and used to explain those results rather than to substitute for them. The Commission should, prior to any payment, verify the fulfilment of milestones and targets on the basis of supporting documentation. |
Or. en
Amendment 845
Dick Erixon
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (26b) Where the application of the principle of 'do no significant harm' increases the operating costs of operations supported under this Regulation, those costs should be transparently identified in annual reporting so that the discharge authority can assess value for money. |
Or. en
Read the rest (1,060 paragraphs)
Amendment 846
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Rody Tolassy, André Rougé
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2. Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | deleted |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. fr
Amendment 847
Tamás Deutsch
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | deleted |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 848
Mireia Borrás Pabón, Raffaele Stancanelli, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Csaba Dömötör, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | deleted |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 849
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) The Plan and its measures are designed, implemented and monitored in a way that ensures compliance and respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of democracy and the rule of law as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and specified, in particular, in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2. Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should be held accountable and provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country reports and country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Member States should identify specific measures to ensure the horizontal condition is met and will continue to be met throughout the entire duration of the plan. No pre-financing should be paid in case of breach of any of the horizontal conditions. All Member States should be required to subject their NRP Plans to a review halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to assess progress with implementing relevant measures as well as to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report and amend the plan with new or modified measures in accordance. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the democracy, Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions are not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the total amount to be withheld should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 850
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sebastian Everding
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect for social inclusion, fundamental rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality and non-discrimination. It should respect the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and gender equality. Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Member States should all ensure, that stakeholders can meaningfully contribute and give feedback at all stages of the NRP Plans, in line with the principle of partnership and multi-level governance. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the nonfulfillment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 851
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund, the Interreg Plans and the EU Facility are implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 and the principles of partnership and multi-level governance. Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these three horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to continuously review their NRP Plans through implementation, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law, Charter and Partnership horizontal conditions is not fulfilled, on the basis of a Commission implementing decision determining the non-fulfilment of the horizontal condition and identifying the specific measures of the NRP Plan affected by the non-fulfilment. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 852
Thomas Geisel
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 853
Hristo Petrov, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 854
Hélder Sousa Silva
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union, or, where relevant, opinions of the EU oversight bodies, for instance the European Board for Media Services should be also taken into account. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any deficiencies, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned, should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 855
Klara Dostalova, Jaroslav Bžoch, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) The implementation of the Fund should respect the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as well as the principles of the rule of law referred to in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092. For that purpose, Member States should provide information on the fulfilment of the relevant horizontal conditions as part of their NRP Plans. The assessment of the fulfilment of those horizontal conditions should be based on objective, transparent and publicly available criteria and carried out in a consistent manner across all Member States. Any assessment should take into account information provided by the Member State concerned and other relevant and verifiable information directly related to the implementation of measures supported under this Regulation. Where deficiencies are identified, Member States should be given the opportunity to submit observations and, where appropriate, remedial measures. Any decision concerning the non-fulfilment of a horizontal condition should be based on objective, duly substantiated and verifiable evidence. Measures affecting payments under this Regulation should be applied only where the identified deficiency has a direct and demonstrable impact on the implementation of measures supported under this Regulation, on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the protection of the financial interests of the Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, any measure affecting payments should be limited to the measures concerned and should take into account the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the identified deficiency. The implementation of horizontal conditions should ensure legal certainty, equal treatment of Member States and respect for their constitutional and institutional arrangements. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 856
Kathleen Funchion
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 857
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the NRP Plans is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 858
Gabriella Gerzsenyi, Kinga Kollár
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges in line with the specific objectives of the NRPP, identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. en
Amendment 859
João Oliveira
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2. Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. | (27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2. Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach. |
| 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) | 2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj) |
Or. pt
Amendment 860
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (28) The global amounts to be allocated per Member State should be set out by the Commission in accordance with the allocation methodology laid down in this Regulation through a single implementing decision. That decision should as a rule cover the amounts under this Regulation and as set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [asylum], Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [border management] and Article 4 of Regulation 202X/XXXX [internal security]. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 861
Luke Ming Flanagan
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (28) The global amounts to be allocated per Member State should be set out by the Commission in accordance with the allocation methodology laid down in this Regulation through a single implementing decision. That decision should as a rule cover the amounts under this Regulation and as set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [asylum], Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [border management] and Article 4 of Regulation 202X/XXXX [internal security]. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 862
João Oliveira
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (28) The global amounts to be allocated per Member State should be set out by the Commission in accordance with the allocation methodology laid down in this Regulation through a single implementing decision. That decision should as a rule cover the amounts under this Regulation and as set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [asylum], Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [border management] and Article 4 of Regulation 202X/XXXX [internal security]. | (28) The global amounts to be allocated per Member State should be set out by the Commission in accordance with the allocation methodology laid down in this Regulation through a single implementing decision. That decision should as a rule cover the amounts under this Regulation and as set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXXX [asylum]. |
Or. pt
Amendment 863
Klara Dostalova, Jaroslav Bžoch, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission an NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 in order to allow for its timely assessment and adoption. To facilitate a smooth and efficient start of implementation, Member States should be able to submit draft NRP Plans from June 2027.Member States should prepare, implement, monitor, amend and evaluate the NRP Plans in partnership with regional and local authorities, economic and social partners, rural stakeholders, civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders, in accordance with their constitutional, institutional and legal frameworks and the partnership principle set out in this Regulation. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring the meaningful involvement of regional and local authorities throughout the entire programming and implementation cycle, in line with the principles of partnership, multi-level governance and shared management. The NRP Plans should be prepared in close cooperation with the Commission and made publicly available following their approval. Member States should be able to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plans in order to better reflect territorial needs, regional specificities and development priorities. Regional managing authorities responsible for the implementation of such chapters should receive resources in a timely and predictable manner, reflecting progress achieved in the implementation of the relevant measures. In order to ensure effective governance, monitoring and coordination of the NRP Plans, Member States should be free to rely, to the greatest extent possible, on existing national, regional and local governance structures and coordination mechanisms. The implementation of this Regulation should avoid the creation of unnecessary administrative structures and should respect the constitutional and institutional arrangements of the Member States. |
Or. en
Amendment 864
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Prior to the submission of the NRP Plan, each Member State should hold a preparatory dialogue with the Commission to agree on the challenges to be addressed in the Plan, and on the adequacy of the milestones and targets for each measure listed. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans at the appropriate territorial level with the full involvement of local and regional authorities, and in partnership with economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and partnership principle set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption. The NRP Plans should be adopted by means of a delegated act on the basis of the Commission’s assessment of Plan’s compliance with all the requirements. In line with current arrangements, Member States should include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). The NRP Plans should also include a dedicated CAP Chapter setting out an intervention strategy incorporating all CAP-related measures. To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up a single national monitoring committees composed of sub-committees competent for the monitoring of specific regional, territorial or sectoral for the chapters, including the CAP chapter. |
Or. en
Amendment 865
Hélder Sousa Silva
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. In order to make sure that the Plans effectively identify and target specific needs, it is essential that they include the input from a wide range of stakeholders and institutions, including, where relevant, cultural, or educational, youth and media institutions and organisations. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional and local authorities are fully involved in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the plans, and that they receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 866
Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. In order to accelerate national-level coordination and to make full use of the extended lead-in time, regions should be entitled to pre-notify individual regional or territorial chapters of the NRP Plan to the Commission, starting from June 2027. Early pre-notification will allow the Commission to engage in a targeted dialogue with each region and, where appropriate, issue a preliminary assessment before the NRP Plan is submitted. Member States should also be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up advisory bodies for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 867
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Following mandatory and appropriate consultations with the local and regional authorities, each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, including regional chapters on the outermost regions and others, where applicable, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans, including regional chapters, where applicable, in mandatory partnership with local and regional authorities and in consultation with economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States should include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities are involved in the preparation, implementation and management of the regional chapters and receive regular payments, without any conditions being imposed on the Member States, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up national and regional monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. pt
Amendment 868
Sabrina Repp, Nora Mebarek, Marcos Ros Sempere, Hannes Heide, Sérgio Gonçalves, Sakis Arnaoutoglou
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 30 June 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation and with a targeted place-based approach. Regional and local authorities shall be fully involved in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the NRP Plans from an early stage. . The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with In line with their institutional structure and current arrangements where no constitutional obstacles persist, Member States should include at least one regional and/or territorial chapter in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that integrated territorial and urban development is considered, and that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plans. |
Or. en
Amendment 869
Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Sophie Wilmès
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. Regional and local authorities should be involved in the preparation, drafting, implementation and evaluation of the NRP Plan, including of the respective regional chapters where appropriate, in accordance with the national constitutional, institutional, legal and financial framework. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 870
Esther Herranz García, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Maravillas Abadía Jover
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. The Commission should, in any case, allow for any delays in the implementation of the new MFF and the rules governing the Fund and present a set of transitional rules for certain multiannual projects and initiatives already under way; |
Or. es
Amendment 871
Gabriella Gerzsenyi, Kinga Kollár
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders, who shall be meaningfully involved in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the NRP Plans in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. The NRP Plans shall also contain an urban Chapter prepared in partnership with the relevant urban authorities. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 872
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. In particular, regional and local authorities should be fully involved in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the NRP Plans. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment. In line with their institutional structure and current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include at least one regional and/or territorial chapter in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that integrated territorial and urban development is considered, and that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plans. |
Or. en
Amendment 873
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should submit a draft initial NRP Plan by 30 June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations, including environmental NGOs, and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Delegated Act. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have to include regional and territorial chapters and also at least a sectoral chapter on CAP, housing, home affairs, just transition, Interreg and urban, and where relevant, outermost regions and fisheries chapters, in their NRP Plan, and should be required to ensure that all managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 874
Valentina Palmisano
on behalf of The Left Group
Younous Omarjee
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans, in accordance with the principle of multilevel governance, in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with a place-based approach, Member States shall include mandatory regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan to identify specific local challenges, reflect territorial disparities, and outline corresponding measures. Member Stated shall that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 875
Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations, including farming organisations, rural community organisations, fisheries representatives, and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 876
João Oliveira
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners – in particular trade unions – and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. Cooperation with the Commission during the preparation and implementation of the Plans should fully abide by the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, the institutional autonomy of the Member States, multilevel governance and the competences of the national, regional and local authorities to determine investment and development priorities. The Plans should be prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments. To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States may set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. pt
Amendment 877
Emma Wiesner, Ciaran Mullooly, Dan Barna
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States should include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan, in line with their institutional structure where no constitutional obstacle persist, and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 878
Rosa Serrano Sierra, Cristina Maestre, Marcos Ros Sempere
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework, the rules set out in this Regulation and with a targeted place-based approach. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 879
André Rougé, Rody Tolassy, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. fr
Amendment 880
Christian Doleschal, Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States should include regional, territorial and regional-sectoral chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. |
Or. de
Amendment 881
Christian Doleschal, Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan. | (Does not affect the English version.) |
Or. de
Amendment 882
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29a) The Commission should assess the NRP Plans proposed by each Member State and should act in close cooperation with the Member State concerned. The Commission should assess the requirements set out in this Regulation and deem whether each requirement has been fulfilled. In the interest of transparency and efficiency, a rating system for the assessment of the proposals for the Plan should be established to that effect, with grading A - full compliance, B - moderate compliance, and C - non-compliance. Appropriate guidelines should be set out in the Annex of this Regulation to serve as a basis for the Commission to assess the requirements in a transparent and equitable manner and to determine the financial contribution in line with the European and specific objectives, as well as the requirements set in this Regulation. Only Plans that have met the assessment criteria should be approved and adopted. The adopted Plans and the assessment of the Commission should be available and shared with the European Parliament and the European Council. |
Or. en
Amendment 883
Pascal Arimont, Wouter Beke
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29a) The transition from the 2021-2027 programming framework, under which regional and local managing authorities managed dedicated operational programmes, to the NRP Plan architecture established by this Regulation should not result in a structural reduction of the financial autonomy of those authorities or in a recentralisation of cohesion spending contrary to the principles of subsidiarity, partnership and multi-level governance. The financial allocation assigned to a regional or territorial chapter, as separately identified in the Council implementing decision approving the NRP Plan, should be regarded as constituting the basis for the Member State's obligation to ensure that the relevant regional or local managing authority receives the corresponding amounts. The Commission should take the continuity of regional investment capacity into account when assessing NRP Plans, in particular when examining compliance with the partnership horizontal condition. |
Or. en
Amendment 884
Marta Temido, Sérgio Gonçalves, Sakis Arnaoutoglou, Maria Noichl
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29a) Urban areas with more than 50 000 inhabitants should provide urban greening plans within the national framework for local climate adaptation, while local and regional authorities should retain full autonomy over concrete planning choices and implementation. Urban areas with more than 20 000 inhabitants should also be able to participate on a voluntary basis. In line with the Commission’s objective of planting 3 billion additional trees by 2030, including in urban and peri-urban areas, such plans should promote biodiverse and accessible urban forests, parks, gardens and tree-lined streets, including native planting and the protection of existing trees and green spaces, in full respect of ecological principles. This would help improve urban microclimates, reduce heat stress and air pollution, support water retention, healthy mobility and urban liveability and enhance urban biodiversity. |
Or. en
Justification
Urban greening is one of the most cost-effective adaptation measures to reduce heat stress, air pollution and flood risks in densely populated areas. It also delivers clear health benefits, notably for older people and vulnerable groups, while improving biodiversity and urban liveability. The amendment balances this objective with full local autonomy on planning and implementation.
Amendment 885
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29a) The Commission should provide clear guidance on the consequences of non-achievement or reversal of milestones, targets or outputs, ensuring that suspensions, financial corrections and recoveries are proportionate and limited to the affected part of the measure. |
Or. en
Amendment 886
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 b (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29b) To ensure democratic accountability of the NRP Plans, the Parliament should be fully involved in the approval and oversight of the Plans. The Parliament should have the right to approve or veto the Plans, in line with the delegated act. The Parliament should also be fully informed about any changes to the Plan and the assessment of the Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 887
André Rougé, Rody Tolassy, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified. |
Or. fr
Amendment 888
João Oliveira
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. pt
Amendment 889
Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Elena Nevado del Campo, Esther Herranz García, Maravillas Abadía Jover, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Carmen Crespo Díaz
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. The Court of Auditors has noted that the reforms and investments included in the National Recovery and Resilience Plans should address ‘all or a significant subset’ of the challenges identified in the European Semester country-specific recommendations – a matter that has not yet undergone a true final assessment and points to unresolved structural challenges. The Court of Auditors has found that the so-called performance-based model, inspired by the experience of the Recovery and Resilience Facility, has revealed weaknesses in its design, implementation and effectiveness, pointing to problems with the traceability of funds and assessment of the true impact of investments and reforms. Adopting such an approach in the EU’s long-term budget is warned against, given the risk of running into the same problems. It is considered that such an approach should not serve as the basis for the design of the National and Regional Partnership Plans. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. es
Amendment 890
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national, regional and local ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all European and specific objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned and detailing how the Plan was elaborated in accordance with multi-level governance and the Partnership principle. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester, how to match the social scoreboard indicator, as well as the National Climate and Energy Plans and the National Restauration Plans, and the Rule of Law report, the reports by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, relevant jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Court of Human Rights and national courts or tribunals, ongoing or concluded infringement proceedings pursuant to Articles 258 to 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, recommendations and findings issued by international bodies in the field of human rights, democracy and the rule of law, and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the measures in the NRP Plans should contribute to achieving a 7% cross-border target, incentivising cooperation and EU added value, including on cross-border and multi-country projects, focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions and for people in vulnerable situations. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and sustainable fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. en
Amendment 891
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership as well as EU added value, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it supports all the objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned, and the proportionality principle. It should also include an explanation of how it effectively addresses the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. As part of the Union's ambition to promote competitiveness and close the innovation divide in Europe's regions, Member States shall support place-based innovation via renewed smart specialisation strategies. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities. They should also provide for a safety net ensuring a minimum level of support to transition and more developed regions according to their indicative average annual allocation of resources for the Investment for jobs and growth goal under the Regulation (EU) 2021/1060. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. The NRP Plans should provide the list and description of measures, comprising reforms, investments and interventions, including the objectives that each of them primarily pursues, the corresponding milestones and targets, the related output indicators listed in the [Performance Regulation] and their estimated cost based on a single methodology elaborated by the Commission to ensure comparability. |
Or. en
Amendment 892
Thomas Geisel
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. en
Amendment 893
Luke Ming Flanagan
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a proportionate contribution to objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges as well as established national policies, such as Ireland's policy of military neutrality, in the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. It shall be ensured that allocations under the cross-border and multi-country projects, including the IPCEIs are not redirected towards defence funding or military capabilities. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. en
Justification
Protocol 38 on the concerns of the Irish people on the Treaty of Lisbon, Article 3 states 'It does not affect the right of Ireland or any other Member State to determine the nature and volume of its defence and security expenditure and the nature of its defence capabilities'. Ireland having to make a 'comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the fund' and the Commission forcing compliance through conditionality if these NRPPs continue to include defence would be contradictory to the treaties.
Amendment 894
Klara Dostalova, Jaroslav Bžoch, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission duly reasoned and substantiated NRP Plans. The NRP Plans should demonstrate how they contribute to the objectives of the Fund while taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial needs, challenges and development priorities of the Member State concerned. Particular attention should be paid to reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, strengthening territorial cohesion and supporting balanced development across all categories of regions, especially less developed regions, rural areas, border regions, islands, outermost regions and regions facing demographic or structural challenges. The NRP Plans should explain how the proposed reforms, investments and other measures contribute to addressing relevant structural challenges and development needs, strengthening competitiveness, resilience, innovation capacity and the functioning of the internal market. Where relevant, the Plans may take into account recommendations and analyses contained in officially adopted Union documents related to the objectives supported by the Fund. The NRP Plans should support projects with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension where these provide clear added value and contribute to the objectives of the Fund. Such projects may include Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs), strategic infrastructure projects, innovation projects and other initiatives contributing to competitiveness, resilience, security of supply and economic development, while ensuring balanced geographical participation and accessibility for all Member States and regions. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, promoting territorial cohesion, supporting demographic resilience and generational renewal, strengthening rural communities, agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture, and improving long-term competitiveness and quality of life across the Union. |
Or. en
Amendment 895
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, including by ensuring that measures previously supported under competitiveness-oriented instruments remain eligible under the NRP Plans, so as to avoid artificial fragmentation between cohesion and competitiveness objectives notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on measures with demonstrable Union added value and the highest expected socioeconomic return on investment, with particular attention to reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. en
Amendment 896
Hélder Sousa Silva
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively address the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester, how to match the social scoreboard indicators, and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by introducing reforms, investments and interventions to support other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal, and provide support measures for youth and its integration in the labour market, social measures, thriving fisheries and aquaculture production, while promoting sustainable cultural tourism and local heritage as drivers of long-term regional attractiveness and economic diversification. |
Or. en
Amendment 897
Dan Barna, Ciaran Mullooly, Ľubica Karvašová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. The NRP Plan should detail how it includes the needs and priorities of the regions and local authorities and how it took on board the suggestions of the civil society and professional organizations reflecting the priorities of the citizens and ensuring the ownership of the plan. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. en
Amendment 898
Kathleen Funchion
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. en
Amendment 899
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. To this end, a sufficient share of the Fund's resources should be directed towards the least developed regions, in order to ensure real economic, social and territorial convergence across the Union. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. el
Amendment 900
Ruggero Razza, Francesco Ventola, Denis Nesci, Antonella Sberna, Michele Picaro
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, including research and technology infrastructure, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions, through specific measures including pilot calls for proposals to support research and technology infrastructure. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. it
Amendment 901
Christian Doleschal, Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national, regional and local ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned and explaining how the Plan was elaborated in accordance with the Partnership Principle and multi-level governance. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. de
Amendment 902
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national, regional and local ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of this Regulation, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned and detailing how the Plan was elaborated in accordance with multi-level governance and the partnership principle. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the funds, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. en
Amendment 903
Elena Nevado del Campo, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Maravillas Abadía Jover
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions, while at the same time ensuring a minimum level of funding for regions in transition and more developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. es
Amendment 904
Joachim Streit
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic and territorial disparities, with a particular focus on competitiveness, innovation, private investment mobilisation, measurable outcomes and the efficient use of Union funds. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. en
Amendment 905
Ciaran Mullooly, Sandro Gozi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions and in rural, peripheral and border regions facing persistent structural challenges. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. en
Amendment 906
Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic, social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. | (30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed and outermost regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production. |
Or. pt
Amendment 907
Marta Wcisło
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30a) Member States should identify investments, reforms and other interventions to address both the objectives and the challenges from the policy reference framework; to be grouped in chapters following either a policy or regional organisation, or a mix of both. It is upon the Member States to decide the distribution of roles and funding between regions and the national level. Member States may choose to set up the payout values for such reforms either from all chapters or from a subset of them Member States should identify investments, reforms and other interventions to address both the objectives and the challenges from the policy reference framework; to be grouped in chapters following either a policy or regional organisation, or a mix of both. It is upon the Member States to decide the distribution of roles and funding between regions and the national level. Member States may choose to set up the payout values for such reforms either from all chapters or from a subset of them. If a Member State chooses an approach with national and regional chapters, with both national and regional reforms, Member States have to separate the financial set up between the regions and national levels to the extent that the requirements of the regulation are complied with, including the requirements linked to horizontal conditionalities and the need to protect the EU financial interests and have to establish Managing Authorities in regions. |
Or. en
Amendment 908
Andrzej Buła, Krzysztof Hetman, Jacek Protas
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30a) Member States should identify investments, reforms and other interventions to address both the objectives and the challenges from the policy reference framework; to be grouped in chapters following either a policy or regional organisation, or a mix of both. It is upon the Member States to decide the distribution of roles and funding between regions and the national level. Member States may choose to set up the payout values for such reforms either from all chapters or from a subset of them Member States should identify investments, reforms and other interventions to address both the objectives and the challenges from the policy reference framework; to be grouped in chapters following either a policy or regional organisation, or a mix of both. It is upon the Member States to decide the distribution of roles and funding between regions and the national level. Member States may choose to set up the payout values for such reforms either from all chapters or from a subset of them. If a Member State chooses an approach with national and regional chapters, with both national and regional reforms, Member States have to separate the financial set up between the regions and national levels to the extent that the requirements of the regulation are complied with, including the requirements linked to horizontal conditionalities and the need to protect the EU financial interests and have to establish Managing Authorities in regions. |
Or. en
Amendment 909
Gabriella Gerzsenyi, Kinga Kollár
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30a) National and Regional Partnership Plans should seek synergies with Union research and innovation programme, recognising the contribution of research and innovation to productivity, competitiveness, resilience and long-term economic growth. Such synergies can contribute to reducing innovation disparities across Member States and strengthening participation throughout the European Research Area. In promoting these synergies, Member States should retain sufficient flexibility to determine investment priorities according to their specific needs and circumstances. The development and implementation of the Plans should be carried out in a timely, efficient and proportionate manner, facilitating the effective deployment of Union support. |
Or. en
Amendment 910
Waldemar Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30a) Particular attention should be paid to regions facing a combination of structural disadvantages, including lower levels of economic development, a high dependence on cohesion policy support and a predominance of small and medium-sized family farms. The implementation of the Fund should contribute to reducing territorial disparities, strengthening rural communities and ensuring that support for agricultural development and cohesion objectives remains complementary and mutually reinforcing. The allocation and implementation of resources under the Fund should not result in a disproportionate reduction of support for vulnerable rural regions and family farming. |
Or. en
Amendment 911
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30a) A competitive, innovative and sustainable food-processing sector contributes significantly to food security, strategic autonomy, economic resilience and territorial cohesion in the Union. In order to strengthen agri-food value chains and support the green and digital transition, Member States should be able to include measures supporting investments in food-processing, including innovation, environmental performance, resource efficiency and industrial modernisation. Such investments should be eligible for support through grants, financial instruments, budgetary guarantees and guarantee schemes in accordance with this Regulation and applicable Union law. |
Or. en
Amendment 912
Hélder Sousa Silva
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (30a) Member States should identify investments, reforms linked to those investments, and other interventions based on the relevant sub-set of specific challenges and needs of the Member State, focusing on the European added value of each investment and intervention, to address both the specific and general objectives of the NRP Plan and the challenges from the policy reference framework and others based on the self-assessment of their needs and challenges; |
Or. en
Amendment 913
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries, in particular territories with natural and geographical handicaps as referred to Article 174 of the TFEU. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to address the needs of and develop thriving border regions, in particular Eastern and Southern border regions, sparsely populated areas, in particular northern sparsely populated regions, demographically challenged and unevenly populated areas, cities, rural and urban areas, areas affected by industrial transition, islands and coastal areas, areas affected by double insularity condition, outermost, mountainous, cross-border and other disadvantaged regions and territories and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. To ensure consistency, Member States are requested to allocate at least 11% of the ERDF/CF national allocations to support the implementation of sustainable urban development strategies. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should develop integrated projects under community-led local development (CLLD) and LEADER to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. To ensure continuity, Member states should prepare territorial just transition strategies, together with relevant local and regional authorities of the territories most negatively affected by transitions, in particular with regard to the expected adaptation of workers or job losses in fossil fuel production and use and the transformation needs of the production processes of industrial facilities with the highest greenhouse gas intensity. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed arrangements for the programming, implementation, financial management, auditing, monitoring and evaluation of the NRP Plan, including by clearly specifying the responsibilities of different national and regional authorities reflecting the objective of establishing a multi-level governance system based on the partnership principle and the measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and innovation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 914
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. It is stressed that cohesion policy is a self-standing Union policy with specific objectives and added value and that its visibility and distinctive nature should be fully maintained within the framework of the NRP plans. To this end, the financial resources allocated to cohesion should be identified and presented separately from those of other sectoral Union policies, in order to avoid internal competition between different policy priorities at Member State level. |
Or. el
Amendment 915
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries in particular those in vulnerable situations or at risk of poverty, while addressing health inequalities and the health impacts of environmental and socio-economic conditions. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas, protect and improve public health and ensure quality jobs, integration in the labour market, a fair economy and a transition for key sectors, including via enhancing sustainable use of natural resources for the agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 916
Maravillas Abadía Jover, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Esther Herranz García, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses and in disadvantaged urban areas, and ensuring equal access to education, healthcare, childcare and long-term care, housing, quality jobs, training, skills development and retraining, integration into the labour market, a fair economy and a transition for key sectors. Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. es
Amendment 917
Luke Ming Flanagan, Arash Saeidi, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sebastian Everding
on behalf of The Left Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries, in particular, those in vulnerable situations and at poverty or risk of falling into poverty. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas, as well as urban deprived areas, and ensure equal access to services on education, health and housing, quality jobs, integration in the labour market, a fair economy and a transition for key sectors, including vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 918
Valentina Palmisano
on behalf of The Left Group
Younous Omarjee
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries, empowering local and regional authorities through the systematic strengthening of their administrative capacity and the guarantee of universal access to high-quality public services. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas, functional areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning, including functional areas to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, including functional areas taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their local and regional governments should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 919
Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas, including through integrated planning for basic services, local infrastructure, farm and non-farm rural enterprises, and access to finance, and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including LEADER, community-led local development and other place-based territorial tools, including also policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 920
Klara Dostalova, Jaroslav Bžoch, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between measures supporting different policy areas and categories of beneficiaries. Such synergies are particularly important in order to provide integrated support for rural and coastal areas and to contribute to the long-term viability and competitiveness of the agricultural, fisheries and aquaculture sectors. Member States should be encouraged to promote integrated approaches in the design and implementation of measures and to make effective use of available financing arrangements. For measures supporting basic services, infrastructure and economic activities in rural and coastal areas, Member States should develop coordinated planning approaches that facilitate access to funding and improve coherence between Union, national, regional and local policies. Particular attention should be paid to the specific needs, capacities and administrative resources of the beneficiaries concerned. Capacity-building activities should support both public administrations and beneficiaries in order to improve the effective implementation of the Fund. The NRP Plan should set out the measures and arrangements necessary for its implementation, monitoring and evaluation, including the estimated costs of the measures, the national contribution and actions aimed at strengthening administrative and absorption capacity. In establishing governance and coordination arrangements, Member States should, to the greatest extent possible, build upon existing national, regional and local structures and mechanisms in order to avoid unnecessary administrative burdens and ensure continuity, proportionality and cost-effectiveness. Close cooperation between the Commission, Member States and relevant regional and local authorities should be encouraged throughout the implementation process. The exchange of good practices, policy learning and innovative approaches should contribute to improving the effectiveness and efficiency of supported measures. |
Or. en
Amendment 921
Christian Doleschal, Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries, with a particular focus on ensuring strong and resilient regional and local governments and public services, allowing measures to be implemented as effectively as possible. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. de
Amendment 922
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate, effective and simplified mechanisms, as well as to ensure that cohesion policy interventions maintain a distinct budgetary and programmatic identity, with clear identification of the relevant funds, objectives and results, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. el
Amendment 923
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries with a particular focus on ensuring strong and resilient local and regional governments and public services. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural, mountainous, cross-border, outermost, depopulated, island and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their local and regional authorities should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 924
Joachim Streit
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. The governance arrangements established under the NRP Plans should remain proportionate and avoid unnecessary administrative structures or duplication of responsibilities. |
Or. en
Amendment 925
Dario Nardella, Camilla Laureti, Stefano Bonaccini
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant and attractive agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries and with the involvement of social partners, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 926
Dan Barna, Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, building mainly on existing structures in order to ensure continuity, professionalism and a quick start of the implementation, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 927
Christian Doleschal, Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas, as well as – in some cases transnational – functional areas, and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, including functional areas, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions and local authorities should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. de
Amendment 928
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including market-based financing instruments and policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 929
Rosa Serrano Sierra, Cristina Maestre, Marcos Ros Sempere
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural, mountainous, depopulated and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. |
Or. en
Amendment 930
Christian Doleschal, Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31) The Plan should ensure complementarity and synergies between different measures supporting different policy areas and targeting different groups of beneficiaries. This is particularly important to offer a comprehensive policy response to develop thriving rural and coastal areas and ensure vibrant agricultural and fisheries sectors. Member States are in particular encouraged to promote such synergies in the design of the measures and chapters and in the application of the cofinancing rates. For measures supporting basic services and infrastructure in rural and coastal areas as well as rural and coastal businesses, Member States should developed an integrated planning to ensure that rural and coastal communities have access to finance through appropriate mechanisms, including policy actions to specific; mechanisms and governance structures to coordinate the programming and implementation of EU, national, regional and local policies, the programming of locally and regionally integrated funding approaches, taking into account the specific context and capacities of the target beneficiaries, the creation of capacity building targeting both the administrations and the beneficiaries. The NRP Plan should set out the detailed set of measures and arrangements for its monitoring and implementation, including establishing NRP Plan authorities, monitoring and coordinating committee, the estimated costs of those measures and the national contribution and measures to enhance the quality of governance and reinforce the administrative capacity of public administrations. Close cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and their regions should be sought and achieved throughout the process; policy learning and experimentation should be encouraged. | (Does not affect the English version.) |
Or. de
Amendment 931
Michal Wiezik, Ľubica Karvašová, Lucia Yar
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31a) To ensure coherence and effectiveness of Union funding, NRP Plans should be consistent with relevant Union environmental legislation, including Directive 2000/60/EC and Regulation (EU) 2024/1991. Member States should take into account, the priorities and needs identified in River Basin Management Plans and National Restoration Plans. Support under this Regulation should contribute to the implementation of those plans, enhancing water resilience, biodiversity, and climate adaptation, while supporting resilient agriculture, forestry, fisheries and regional development. Such support should help Member States meet their obligations under Union law in a cost-effective manner, strengthen resilience to climate-related risks and reduce long-term environmental and socio-economic costs. |
Or. en
Amendment 932
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31a) In order to ensure budgetary efficiency of limited funds, the Member States together with the Commission should ensure policy coherence and consistency within and between the NRP Plans during the planning and design of the NRP Plans, specifically looking at externalities and doubled expenditures and costs, for example with regard to environmental pollution and impacts on public and environmental health, ensuring that expenditure in one area does not lead to further expenditure in another. The precautionary principle should apply, and the coherence and consistency check should also verify that compared to the previous programming period there is no backsliding in the high standard of protection for the environment and public health assured in the Treaty. |
Or. en
Amendment 933
Dick Erixon
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31a) In light of the fact that, according to the Annual Report of the European Court of Auditors for the financial year 2024, outstanding loans borrowed by the Union could exceed EUR 900 billion by 2027, which is almost ten times the level from 2020 before the introduction of the NGEU recovery package, and that rising borrowing costs pose a risk to future budgets and reduce the fiscal space for new priorities, any financial support under this Regulation in the form of a loan should therefore be calibrated against that fiscal pressure, demonstrate clear added value for every euro committed and be subject to the strictest budgetary control and audit safeguards. |
Or. en
Amendment 934
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31a) In order to ensure the efficient use of Union resources, the Commission should assess policy coherence and consistency within and between the NRP Plans before their final adoption, including by identifying externalities, in relation to environmental pollution and impacts on public and environmental health. In line with the precautionary principle, that assessment should also verify that the Plans do not lead to backsliding compared to the previous programming period in the level of protection for the environment and public health. |
Or. en
Amendment 935
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31a) In order to maintain the effectiveness and distinctiveness of cohesion policy, it is essential that the resources allocated to cohesion are presented and monitored separately within the NRPs. The integration of multiple Union policies into a single programming framework should not lead to a weakening of cohesion policy or to a reallocation of resources to the detriment of the objectives of economic, social and territorial cohesion set out in Articles 174 to 178 TFEU. |
Or. el
Amendment 936
Marta Temido, André Franqueira Rodrigues, Sérgio Gonçalves, Sakis Arnaoutoglou, Maria Noichl
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (31a) In order to ensure the efficient use of the Union resources, the Commission should assess policy coherence and consistency within and between the NRP Plans before their final adoption, including by identifying externalities and should take into account the risk of carbon and environmental leakage where interventions with significant sectoral consequences could shift production outside the Union to third countries with weaker environmental, climate or animal welfare standards. |
Or. en
Amendment 937
João Oliveira
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (32) Financial support for a NRP Plan should be possible in the form of a loan, subject to the conclusion of a loan agreement with the Commission, on the basis of a duly substantiated request by the Member State concerned presented together with the submission of its NRP Plan. The request for loan support should be justified by the higher financial needs linked to additional reforms and investments included in the NRP Plan and by a higher cost of the NRP Plan than the sum of the Union financial contribution and the national contribution. | deleted |
Or. pt
Amendment 938
Bert-Jan Ruissen, Dick Erixon
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (32) Financial support for a NRP Plan should be possible in the form of a loan, subject to the conclusion of a loan agreement with the Commission, on the basis of a duly substantiated request by the Member State concerned presented together with the submission of its NRP Plan. The request for loan support should be justified by the higher financial needs linked to additional reforms and investments included in the NRP Plan and by a higher cost of the NRP Plan than the sum of the Union financial contribution and the national contribution. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 939
Dick Erixon
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (32) Financial support for a NRP Plan should be possible in the form of a loan, subject to the conclusion of a loan agreement with the Commission, on the basis of a duly substantiated request by the Member State concerned presented together with the submission of its NRP Plan. The request for loan support should be justified by the higher financial needs linked to additional reforms and investments included in the NRP Plan and by a higher cost of the NRP Plan than the sum of the Union financial contribution and the national contribution. | (32) Financial support for a NRP Plan should be possible in the form of a loan, subject to the conclusion of a loan agreement with the Commission, on the basis of a duly substantiated request by the Member State concerned presented together with the submission of its NRP Plan. The request for loan support should be justified by the higher financial needs linked to additional reforms and investments included in the NRP Plan and by a higher cost of the NRP Plan than the sum of the Union financial contribution and the national contribution. Each loan should be subject to the audit and control rights of the Commission, the Court of Auditors, OLAF and, where the Member State participates in the enhanced cooperation under Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the EPPO; the Commission should report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of each loan agreement, the debt-servicing cost attributable to it, the impact achieved per euro disbursed, and the proportionality of the loan to the absorption capacity of the Member State concerned. Furthermore, the share of Union borrowing undertaken to finance support under this Regulation attributable to each Member State, calculated on the basis of that Member State's share in financing the Union budget, should be reported by the Commission in a form suitable for inclusion in the assessment of that Member State's long-term debt sustainability, so that Union-level borrowing is recognised transparently as a Member State exposure rather than as a hidden liability, remains subject to the same fiscal disciplines and national debt-brake mechanisms as other public liabilities, and Member States are not driven into a debt trap by cumulative implicit guarantees on Union debt. |
Or. en
Amendment 940
Klara Dostalova, Jaroslav Bžoch, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (32) Financial support for a NRP Plan should be possible in the form of a loan, subject to the conclusion of a loan agreement with the Commission, on the basis of a duly substantiated request by the Member State concerned presented together with the submission of its NRP Plan. The request for loan support should be justified by the higher financial needs linked to additional reforms and investments included in the NRP Plan and by a higher cost of the NRP Plan than the sum of the Union financial contribution and the national contribution. | (32) The request for loan support should be justified by the need to finance additional reforms, investments or strategic projects contributing to the objectives of the Fund, including measures supporting competitiveness, resilience, economic, social and territorial cohesion, energy security or infrastructure development. Loan support should also be available to support Strategic Regional Projects, measures addressing demographic decline, population retention, industrial restructuring, decarbonisation-related transition and other territorial challenges affecting regional development and cohesion. Loan support may be appropriate where the overall cost of the NRP Plan exceeds the available Union financial contribution and the national contribution, or where additional financing is required within the approved financing structure of the Plan, without increasing the total estimated costs of the measure or reducing the applicable national contribution, in particular to address significant structural, territorial or demographic challenges. The allocation of loan support should contribute to balanced territorial development and upward convergence across the Union and should take into account the objectives of economic, social and territorial cohesion. The provision of loan support should contribute to the effective implementation of the NRP Plan while ensuring sound financial management, proportionality and equal treatment of Member States. In order to ensure fair access to loan support, the allocation of loans should be based on objective and transparent criteria and avoid excessive concentration of available resources in a limited number of Member States. |
Or. en
Amendment 941
Auke Zijlstra
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (32) Financial support for a NRP Plan should be possible in the form of a loan, subject to the conclusion of a loan agreement with the Commission, on the basis of a duly substantiated request by the Member State concerned presented together with the submission of its NRP Plan. The request for loan support should be justified by the higher financial needs linked to additional reforms and investments included in the NRP Plan and by a higher cost of the NRP Plan than the sum of the Union financial contribution and the national contribution. | (32) Financial support for a NRP Plan should never be possible in the form of a loan. |
Or. nl
Amendment 942
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (32) Financial support for a NRP Plan should be possible in the form of a loan, subject to the conclusion of a loan agreement with the Commission, on the basis of a duly substantiated request by the Member State concerned presented together with the submission of its NRP Plan. The request for loan support should be justified by the higher financial needs linked to additional reforms and investments included in the NRP Plan and by a higher cost of the NRP Plan than the sum of the Union financial contribution and the national contribution. | (32) Financial support for a NRP Plan should be possible in the form of a loan, subject to the conclusion of a loan agreement with the Commission, on the basis of a duly substantiated request by the Member State concerned presented together with the submission of its NRP Plan. The request for loan support should be justified by the higher financial needs linked to additional reforms and investments included in the NRP Plan, by a higher cost of the NRP Plan than the sum of the Union financial contribution and the national contribution and shall never substitute for national public investment that the Member State would otherwise have undertaken. |
Or. en
Amendment 943
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. | (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Member States shall maintain their level of national structural public expenditure in the areas supported by the Fund at least at the level of the reference period preceding the submission of the plan, so as to ensure that Union support is genuinely additional to national investment and does not substitute for it. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be verified by the Commission in each payment application, as a condition for payment authorisation, over the lifetime of the programme. Member States are encouraged to complement their national contribution through financial instruments and other market-based financing mechanisms, which generate a revolving effect and mobilise additional private investment. |
Or. en
Amendment 944
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. | (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. The Commission should also ensure that cohesion policy resources are identified and monitored separately from resources from other Union policies included in the NRP plans, in order to ensure transparency, accountability and visibility of the contribution of cohesion policy to economic, social and territorial convergence. |
Or. el
Amendment 945
André Rougé, Rody Tolassy, Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. | (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average, taking into account the additional financial burdens borne by the outermost regions as a result of their structural economic and geographical disadvantages. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. |
Or. fr
Amendment 946
Hélder Sousa Silva
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. | (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this cofinancing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The NRP Plan should respect the principle of additionality of Union funding as such should complement public expenditure of a Member State. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the NRP Plan, |
Or. en
Amendment 947
Joachim Streit
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. | (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. Union support should complement, and where appropriate leverage, private investment and other non-public sources of financing. |
Or. en
Amendment 948
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. | (33) To maximise impact and national, regional and local ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average, as well as the additional costs arising from the situation of the outermost regions. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. |
Or. en
Amendment 949
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. | (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average and be in line with the minimum national contribution rate as set out in this Regulation. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. |
Or. en
Amendment 950
Gabriel Mato, André Franqueira Rodrigues, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Sérgio Gonçalves, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Rody Tolassy
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. | (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average, as well as the additional costs arising from the situation of the outermost regions. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. |
Or. en
Justification
It is essential that the national contribution to the estimated costs of measures under the NRP duly takes into account the additional costs incurred by the outermost regions, in view of their specific characteristics as recognised in Article 349 TFEU.
Amendment 951
Cristina Maestre, André Franqueira Rodrigues, Elena Sancho Murillo, Stefano Bonaccini, Rosa Serrano Sierra
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. | (33) To maximise impact and national ownership of Union funding while upholding principles of equity and solidarity, the national contribution to the estimated costs of the different measures of the NRP Plan should reflect the varying levels of economic development of regions in terms of per capita in relation to the EU-27 average, as well as the additional costs arising from the situation of the outermost regions. Compliance with this co-financing requirement should be assessed ex ante as part of the approval procedure of the Plan. The additionality of the EU contribution will be monitored by the Commission over the lifetime of the programme. |
Or. en
Justification
It is essential that the national contribution to the estimated costs of the measures under the NRP also takes into account the additional costs faced by the outermost regions in view of their specific characteristics, as recognised in Article 349 of the TFEU.
Amendment 952
João Oliveira
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (33a) The classification of NUTS 2 regions as least developed, in transition or most developed, as established in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003, must be based on objective criteria capable of adequately reflecting the level of economic and social development of each region. EU co-financing rates must likewise be linked to the economic and social reality of the regions. Current classification criteria, based exclusively on GDP per capita, do not reflect possible considerable internal asymmetries within each region, including differentiated social and labour realities, asymmetrical territorial centres of economic activity within the same region or unequal conditions in access to employment and public services. These criteria should be reviewed in order to avoid inappropriate reclassifications in the light of regional realities, with negative social and economic impacts on the most disadvantaged regions, including on their respective co-financing rates, resulting in considerably higher effort rates for regional and local beneficiaries, which reduces the possibility of executing essential and structuring projects and investments. |
Or. pt
Amendment 953
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (34) This Regulation should lay down an indicative financial envelope for the Fund. For the purpose of this Regulation, current prices should be calculated by applying a fixed 2% deflator. | (34) This Regulation should lay down an indicative financial envelope for the funds. For the purpose of this Regulation, current prices should be calculated by applying a fixed 2% deflator. |
Or. en
Amendment 954
Waldemar Buda
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (34a) The provisions of this Regulation as well as its governance arrangements should be conducive to proper decision-making by the budgetary authority and to appropriate parliamentary oversight. In particular, in line with Article 47(2) of the Financial Regulation, any specification of the NRPP’s internal architecture should be duly reflected in the budget nomenclature through the introduction of corresponding budget lines - including budget lines for individual funds. |
Or. en
Amendment 955
Klara Dostalova, Jaroslav Bžoch, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (35) In order to foster synergies between the NRP Plans and other Union instruments, it should be possible to include in the Plans measures implemented through financial contributions made by the Member State to the [ECF InvestEU Instrument] or to other Union instruments implementing policies aligned to the objectives of the NRP Plan, including contributions necessary to support the implementation through those instruments, provided that such measures comply with this Regulation. | (35) In order to foster synergies between the NRP Plans and other Union instruments, it should be possible to include in the Plans measures implemented through financial contributions made by the Member State to the [ECF InvestEU Instrument] or to other Union instruments implementing policies aligned with the objectives of the NRP Plan, including contributions necessary to support implementation through those instruments, provided that such measures comply with this Regulation. Such contributions should complement, and not replace, investments implemented through the NRP Plans and should contribute to the objectives of economic, social and territorial cohesion, competitiveness and balanced territorial development. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring that all Member States and regions have fair access to opportunities provided by centrally managed Union instruments. The use of such instruments should avoid overlaps, duplication of financing, disproportionate administrative burdens and fragmentation of support, while promoting synergies with Strategic Regional Projects and other investments identified in the NRP Plans. |
Or. en
Amendment 956
Dan Barna, Ciaran Mullooly, Ľubica Karvašová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (35) In order to foster synergies between the NRP Plans and other Union instruments, it should be possible to include in the Plans measures implemented through financial contributions made by the Member State to the [ECF InvestEU Instrument] or to other Union instruments implementing policies aligned to the objectives of the NRP Plan, including contributions necessary to support the implementation through those instruments, provided that such measures comply with this Regulation. | (35) In order to foster synergies between the NRP Plans and other Union instruments, it should be possible to include in the Plans measures implemented through financial contributions made by the Member State to the [ECF InvestEU Instrument] or to other Union instruments implementing policies aligned to the objectives of the NRP Plan, including contributions necessary to support the implementation through those instruments, provided that such measures comply with this Regulation. It should also be possible for a project to be financed through more than one financial instrument as long as it contributes to achieving the Union’s objectives and the expenses are not double-financed. |
Or. en
Amendment 957
Joachim Streit
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (35) In order to foster synergies between the NRP Plans and other Union instruments, it should be possible to include in the Plans measures implemented through financial contributions made by the Member State to the [ECF InvestEU Instrument] or to other Union instruments implementing policies aligned to the objectives of the NRP Plan, including contributions necessary to support the implementation through those instruments, provided that such measures comply with this Regulation. | (35) In order to foster synergies between the NRP Plans and other Union instruments, it should be possible to include in the Plans measures implemented through financial contributions made by the Member State to the [ECF InvestEU Instrument] or to other Union instruments implementing policies aligned to the objectives of the NRP Plan, including contributions necessary to support the implementation through those instruments, provided that such measures comply with this Regulation. Particular attention should be given to financial instruments and guarantee schemes capable of mobilising private capital and reducing reliance on direct public subsidies. |
Or. en
Amendment 958
Christian Doleschal
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (35a) Regions and Member States that receive smaller allocations from European support instruments in the future should be granted greater flexibility in the area of State aid to enable them to compensate for these reductions through national and regional support instruments, including existing programmes such as Germany’s joint task scheme ‘Improvement of the regional economic structure’ (GRW), and thereby ensure economic, social and territorial cohesion, the strengthening of rural areas, the development of border and internal border regions, and a level playing field within the Union as a whole. |
Or. de
Amendment 959
Klara Dostalova, Jaroslav Bžoch, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (36) In duly justified cases, such as crisis situations or other imperative grounds of public interest, the Commission should be able to propose to the Council to adopt an implementing decision approving a NRP Plan in time to allow the necessary actions under this Regulation, while identifying the deficiencies which need to be addressed and the corresponding measures impacted by such deficiencies, for which no payments should be made until the situation has been remedied. | (36) In duly justified and exceptional circumstances, including crisis situations requiring the rapid mobilisation of support, the Commission should be able to propose to the Council the adoption of an implementing decision approving an NRP Plan while identifying any outstanding deficiencies requiring further remedial action. Such an approach should be limited to situations where the overall objectives and implementation framework of the Plan can be satisfactorily assessed and where delaying the approval of the Plan would risk undermining the effective achievement of its objectives. Any identified deficiencies and the measures concerned should be clearly specified and based on objective, verifiable and duly substantiated evidence. Where necessary, payments related to the measures directly affected by such deficiencies may be suspended until the identified deficiencies have been remedied. Any restriction of payments should be proportionate, limited to the measures concerned and applied only where the identified deficiency has a direct and demonstrable impact on the implementation of the measures, the sound financial management of the Union budget or the protection of the financial interests of the Union. The application of such measures should respect the principles of legal certainty, proportionality and equal treatment of Member States. |
Or. en
Amendment 960
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (36) In duly justified cases, such as crisis situations or other imperative grounds of public interest, the Commission should be able to propose to the Council to adopt an implementing decision approving a NRP Plan in time to allow the necessary actions under this Regulation, while identifying the deficiencies which need to be addressed and the corresponding measures impacted by such deficiencies, for which no payments should be made until the situation has been remedied. | (36) The Commission should be allowed to approve an NRP Plan which does not contain all the required elements, as long as it indicates the parts of the Plan that are missing and that the Member State provides indicative targets and financial plans to demonstrate the overall consistency and coherence of the Plan. Within three months of the approval of the NRP Plan, the Member State should submit an amended Plan with the missing elements. In duly justified cases, the Commission should adopt a delegated act approving a NRP Plan in time to allow the necessary actions under this Regulation, while identifying the deficiencies which need to be addressed and the corresponding measures impacted by such deficiencies, for which no payments should be made until the situation has been remedied. |
Or. en
Amendment 961
Joachim Streit
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (36) In duly justified cases, such as crisis situations or other imperative grounds of public interest, the Commission should be able to propose to the Council to adopt an implementing decision approving a NRP Plan in time to allow the necessary actions under this Regulation, while identifying the deficiencies which need to be addressed and the corresponding measures impacted by such deficiencies, for which no payments should be made until the situation has been remedied. | (36) In duly justified cases, such as crisis situations or other imperative grounds of public interest, the Commission should be able to propose to the Council to adopt an implementing decision approving a NRP Plan in time to allow the necessary actions under this Regulation, while identifying the deficiencies which need to be addressed and the corresponding measures impacted by such deficiencies, for which no payments should be made until the situation has been remedied. Such exceptional procedures should remain strictly limited in time and scope and be subject to full transparency towards the budgetary authority. |
Or. en
Amendment 962
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (36) In duly justified cases, such as crisis situations or other imperative grounds of public interest, the Commission should be able to propose to the Council to adopt an implementing decision approving a NRP Plan in time to allow the necessary actions under this Regulation, while identifying the deficiencies which need to be addressed and the corresponding measures impacted by such deficiencies, for which no payments should be made until the situation has been remedied. | (36) In duly justified and exceptional cases, such as crisis situations or other imperative grounds of public interest, the Commission should be able to propose to the Council to adopt an implementing decision approving a NRP Plan in time to allow the necessary actions under this Regulation, while identifying the deficiencies which need to be addressed and the corresponding measures impacted by such deficiencies, for which no payments should be made until the situation has been remedied. |
Or. en
Amendment 963
Klara Dostalova, Jaroslav Bžoch, Ondřej Knotek, Jana Nagyová, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. | (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the nature and scope of the changes proposed and without creating unnecessary administrative burden. Where relevant, amendments should be prepared in accordance with the partnership principle and the multi-level governance arrangements applicable to the Plan. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 964
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. | (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation, in particular the European and specific objectives, as well as the requirements, in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. Those amendments should not result in any backsliding regarding environmental commitments nor the ambition of the plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 965
Elena Nevado del Campo, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Esther Herranz García, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Maravillas Abadía Jover
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. | (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. The managing and intermediate authorities should be duly informed of any changes made to the NRPP. |
Or. es
Amendment 966
Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. | (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed, and within a timeframe that does not unduly delay support to affected beneficiaries or territories. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 967
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. | (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the funds. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 968
João Oliveira
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. | (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission’s assessment should be limited to ascertaining that the proposed changes are in compliance with this Regulation, with due regard for the principles of proportionality, subsidiarity and national and regional ownership. Member States should be able to make minor adjustments, correct clerical errors or carry out technical alterations by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission. |
Or. pt
Amendment 969
Norbert Lins, Marion Walsmann, Stefan Köhler, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Alexander Bernhuber, Herbert Dorfmann, Paulo do Nascimento Cabral, Maria Walsh, Esther Herranz García, Daniel Buda, Lena Düpont, Céline Imart
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. | (37) Member States should have the possibility to make reasoned requests to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 970
Christian Doleschal, Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. | (37) Member States should have the possibility to make reasoned requests to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. |
Or. de
Amendment 971
Waldemar Buda, Bogdan Rzońca
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37a) In order to ensure legal certainty, proportionality and the simplification of administrative procedures, control and sanction systems under this Regulation should be designed to support compliance rather than to impose punitive measures for minor or unintentional errors. Beneficiaries should have the opportunity to correct obvious mistakes and inaccuracies without disproportionate financial consequences, provided that no fraud or intentional misconduct is involved. The use of automated monitoring tools, including satellite-based systems, should contribute to more efficient administration and risk management, while fully respecting the rights of beneficiaries to be informed, to provide clarifications and to request human review before any reduction, suspension or recovery of support is decided. Administrative penalties and financial corrections should be proportionate to the nature, gravity, duration and recurrence of the non-compliance concerned. |
Or. en
Amendment 972
Danuše Nerudová
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37a) The NRP Plan shall describe how support contributes to improving the competitiveness, resilience and generational renewal of small and medium-sized farms and family farms and how it prevents disproportionate concentration of support among large agricultural holdings. |
Or. en
Amendment 973
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 974
Klara Dostalova
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. | (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should assess the progress made in implementing the measures, take into account the main findings of relevant evaluations and, where appropriate, review the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan. It should also provide an opportunity to take account of new challenges, changing circumstances and, where relevant, crisis situations affecting the implementation of the Plan. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State and the regions concerned, including any significant financial, economic, social, demographic or territorial developments, should be taken into account. Where necessary, the Member State may submit amendments to the NRP Plan following the review. Any amendments resulting from the mid-term review should maintain an appropriate balance between competitiveness, resilience and economic, social and territorial cohesion objectives and avoid undermining support for regional development, less developed regions and territories facing structural challenges. Where amendments are proposed, the revised NRP Plan should include the relevant modifications to measures, estimated costs, milestones, targets and outputs, as appropriate, including the programming of the flexibility amount The preparation of any amendments should take place in accordance with the partnership principle and the multi-level governance arrangements applicable to the Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 975
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. | (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. The mid-term review shall also include a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of anti-fraud measures put in place by the Member State, including the results of audits conducted by national audit authorities, OLAF and, where applicable, the EPPO, and shall identify any corrective measures necessary to address identified deficiencies. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. |
Or. en
Amendment 976
João Oliveira
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socio-economic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. | (38) Each Member State may carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review may provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socio-economic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. |
Or. pt
Amendment 977
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. | (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, information on the underlying costs related to achievement of the milestones and targets, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. The revised milestones and targets should not result in the reduction of the overall ambition of the Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 978
Joachim Streit
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. | (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. The review should include an assessment of effectiveness, efficiency and measurable results achieved through the implementation of the Plan. |
Or. en
Amendment 979
Hélder Sousa Silva
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. | (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. The Commission should report to the Parliament on the trends detected through the mid-term reviews. |
Or. en
Amendment 980
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. | (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan in respect of the partnership principle, fully involving local and regional authorities. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. |
Or. en
Amendment 981
Ciaran Mullooly
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. | (38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development, paying particular attention to rural depopulation and regional service deficits, should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. |
Or. en
Amendment 982
Auke Zijlstra
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) An EU Facility should be set up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. | deleted |
Or. nl
Amendment 983
Klara Dostalova
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. | (39) An EU Facility should be established to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension requiring coordination at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support, where such projects contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation and provide tangible benefits for Member States, regions and citizens. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring balanced geographical participation and accessibility for all Member States and regions. The Facility should also support Strategic Regional Projects and other investments contributing to competitiveness, resilience, connectivity, energy security and economic, social and territorial cohesion. It should help Member States and regions address urgent and specific needs arising from crisis situations, including major natural disasters and other exceptional circumstances, and support recovery, reconstruction and resilience-building efforts. The Facility should provide flexibility to respond to emerging challenges requiring coordinated action at Union level, while ensuring consistency with the objectives of this Regulation and complementarity with national and regional investments. It should also provide technical support to Member States, regional and local authorities and other relevant stakeholders for the effective implementation of measures supported under this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union's legislative and budgetary framework can effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States while preserving economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Union. The Facility should primarily be implemented under shared management as the preferred implementation mode. Direct or indirect management should be used only where duly justified by the nature or specific objectives of the measure concerned and where such implementation modalities provide a clear added value. |
Or. en
Amendment 984
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet, Valérie Deloge, Rody Tolassy, André Rougé, Gilles Pennelle
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) An EU Facility should be set up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. | (39) An EU Facility should be set up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support, and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. |
Or. fr
Amendment 985
Hélder Sousa Silva
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. | (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster or destruction of cultural or natural heritage, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. The Commission should report, on an annual basis, to the Parliament on the performance of the Facility. Such reporting should focus on the trends detected and synergies of the Facility with other EU funding instruments, in particular the European Social Fund, ERASMUS+, AgoraEU and the European Competitiveness Fund. |
Or. en
Amendment 986
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. | (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. In that context, transport should be recognised as an inherent transnational sector, given its cross-border nature and its key role in ensuring connectivity, cohesion and the functioning of the internal market, thereby justifying its inclusion within the scope of such support. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. |
Or. en
Amendment 987
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. | (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster or destruction of cultural or natural heritage, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. The financing and the specific implementation rules for LIFE actions under the facility are defined as part of the EU Facility. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. |
Or. en
Amendment 988
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. | (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, including projects contributing to the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the Union's economy, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. |
Or. en
Amendment 989
Joachim Streit
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) An EU Facility should be set-up to complement implementation at national and regional level. The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. | (39) The EU Facility should support projects of a transnational dimension, with a high and measurable Union added value, which require additional coordination efforts at Union level and cannot be effectively achieved at national, regional or local level, in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity, proportionality and sound financial management, as well as evidence-based policy support and which contribute to the objectives set out in this Regulation. It should also help Member States in swiftly addressing urgent and specific needs as a response to a crisis situation, such as a major national or regional natural disaster, and foster repair and recovery in view of increasing resilience following a crisis. It should also cater for uncertainty by providing the Union with additional room for manoeuvre to adjust to emerging priorities at Union level, which require a coordinated response. It should finally provide technical support to Member States to effectively implement the policies covered by this Regulation. In the context of future enlargements, it is essential to ensure that the Union’s legislative and budgetary framework can also effectively accommodate support for the accession of new Member States. In doing so, the Facility should have the possibility to resort to shared, direct or indirect management depending on the type of measure and the most effective course of action. |
Or. en
Amendment 990
Klara Dostalova
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39a) Union-level instruments and centrally managed programmes should contribute to the objectives of economic, social and territorial cohesion and ensure balanced geographical participation across the Union. Particular attention should be paid to facilitating access for all Member States and regions, including less developed regions and territories facing structural challenges, in order to avoid the concentration of support in a limited number of territories and to maximise the territorial impact of Union investments. To support balanced territorial development and ensure that competitiveness objectives contribute to cohesion across the Union, a significant share of resources under centrally managed instruments should contribute to economic, social and territorial cohesion, including through investments benefitting less developed regions and regions facing structural, demographic or industrial transition challenges. |
Or. en
Amendment 991
Klara Dostalova
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. | (40) In case of crises resulting from natural disasters and in order to ensure the availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should complement the efforts of the Member States concerned and contribute to financing measures addressing the damage and consequences caused by such crises. To facilitate a rapid response and simplify procedures, a part of the national allocation of each Member State should constitute a flexibility amount ("crisis and mid-term review measures"). This should ensure that sufficient financial resources remain available throughout the implementation period of the NRP Plans to address unforeseen challenges, crisis situations and changing needs. The flexibility amount should enable Member States to respond swiftly and effectively to crises and exceptional circumstances while maintaining support for long-term development priorities. In justified cases, Member States should be able to programme resources from the flexibility amount through a simplified amendment procedure, taking into account the urgency and nature of the situation. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring timely support for affected regions, communities, rural areas and economic sectors. Where the available flexibility amount is not sufficient to address the identified needs, additional support under Union actions may be mobilised. As a measure of last resort, the Commission may use the budget cushion where other available resources under the Facility are insufficient to respond effectively to the crisis concerned. |
Or. en
Amendment 992
Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki, Geadis Geadi
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. | (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. Certain Member States and regions of the Union are systematically affected by natural disasters, such as forest fires, floods, earthquakes and droughts. The Mediterranean regions are facing increasing impacts due to climate change It is considered that the Fund should give priority to prevention, flood protection, earthquake protection, water management and civil protection projects, particularly in the most exposed regions of the Union. |
Or. el
Amendment 993
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. | (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. They should also serve as a support mechanism in cases of destruction of the Union's cultural and natural heritage and allow for timely reparatory actions and reduction of damages. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan, without compromising measures that targeted the most vulnerable, before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. In cases of natural disasters, the minimum national contribution rate may be reduced to 0%. |
Or. en
Amendment 994
Hélder Sousa Silva
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. | (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. They should also serve as a support mechanism in cases of destruction of the Union's cultural and natural heritage and allow for timely reparatory actions and reduction of damages. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan, without compromising measures that targeted the most vulnerable, before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. |
Or. en
Amendment 995
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. | (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis, strictly limited to measures directly linked to the crisis concerned and subject to rigorous ex-post assessment of their effectiveness and value for money. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. |
Or. en
Amendment 996
Joachim Streit
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. | (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. The mobilisation of additional Union resources should remain exceptional and should not replace prudent national contingency planning. |
Or. en
Amendment 997
Maravillas Abadía Jover, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Esther Herranz García, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. | (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”) without undermining the general and specific objectives of the fund, in particular those relating to social cohesion. This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. |
Or. es
Amendment 998
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. | (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the funds, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”), without undermining the general and specific objectives of the individual funds under shared management. This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. |
Or. en
Amendment 999
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters and to ensure availability of resources throughout the duration of the Fund, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, a part of the natural envelope of each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount (“crisis and mid-term review measures”). This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its unallocated flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. It should be possible for the Commission to use the budget cushion as a last resort option to provide support should other resources under the Facility prove insufficient to cover the needs. | (40) In case of crises as a result of natural disasters, Union support should be complementary to the efforts of the Member States concerned and be used to cover a share of the measures implemented to deal with the damage caused by a crisis. To finance these interventions and simplify procedures, 5% of the Union financial contribution for each Member State should constitute the flexibility amount available each year to respond to crisis, with regard to each of the allocations provided for in the NRP Plans, with the exception of the allocation to CAP interventions. A specific crisis flexibility amount should apply to CAP interventions, corresponding to 5% ringfenced for crisis payment for farmers under the 'rural envelope'. This will ensure sufficient financial resources for Member States to react to crises until the end of the implementation of the NRP Plans. The estimation of the type and amount of support to be provided to the Member State concerned should follow a multi-step approach whereby the Member State should first proceed to amending its NRP Plan before requesting to programme a part of its flexibility amount and, where the flexibility amount requested and available is not sufficient to cover the needs, request additional support from the Union actions. |
Or. en
Amendment 1000
Jean-Marc Germain, Sabrina Repp, Cristina Maestre
on behalf of the S&D Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40a) In light of the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters across the Union, driven notably by climate change, it is essential to strengthen the Union’s capacity to respond swiftly and effectively to emergency situations. In case of emergencies it is of outmost importance to ensure synergies between all Union instruments such as the Solidarity Reserve for Natural Disasters, the Union Civil Protection Mechanism and the funds under shared management. |
Or. en
Amendment 1001
Klara Dostalova
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) A Unity Safety Net should be established to stabilize agricultural markets in times of market disturbances. It should be used to address periods and threats of market imbalance, including those caused by issues related to animal or plant health, which impact the prices of agricultural products and the costs of inputs in the whole or part of the internal market. In order to safeguard the Union’s strategic autonomy in food supply and ensure food security, the funding allocated for market support through the Unity Safety Net should take into account mounting uncertainties in agricultural markets and increased indirect impact of animal health issues on market balance. The Union safety net does not aim to compensate for direct losses suffered by farmers due to natural disasters. In line with the goal of stabilising the Union agricultural markets, resources dedicated to promotion campaigns about Union farm products should continue in order to open up new market opportunities for the Union agricultural sector and increase the visibility and market share of its products both within the Union and internationally. | (41) A Unity Safety Net should be established to contribute to the stabilisation of agricultural markets in times of severe market disturbances. It should be available to address periods and risks of market imbalance, including those resulting from animal and plant health crises, disruptions of supply chains, extreme weather events, geopolitical developments, market volatility or significant increases in production costs affecting agricultural producers in the whole or part of the internal market. In order to safeguard the Union' s food security, strategic autonomy and the long term competitiveness and resilience of the agricultural sector, the funding allocated through the Unity Safety Net should take into account increasing uncertainty in agricultural markets and the indirect effects of animal and plant health crises on market stability. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring rapid and effective support for farmers and agricultural sectors facing exceptional market pressures. The Union Safety Net should not aim to compensate for direct losses caused by natural disasters, which should be addressed through other appropriate instruments and crisis response mechanisms. In line with the objective of strengthening the resilience and competitiveness of the Union agricultural sector, resources dedicated to the promotion of Union agricultural products should continue to support the opening of new market opportunities, diversification of export destinations and increased visibility of Union products both within the Union and internationally. |
Or. en
Amendment 1002
Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Julien Sanchez, André Rougé, Rody Tolassy, Angéline Furet
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) A Unity Safety Net should be established to stabilize agricultural markets in times of market disturbances. It should be used to address periods and threats of market imbalance, including those caused by issues related to animal or plant health, which impact the prices of agricultural products and the costs of inputs in the whole or part of the internal market. In order to safeguard the Union’s strategic autonomy in food supply and ensure food security, the funding allocated for market support through the Unity Safety Net should take into account mounting uncertainties in agricultural markets and increased indirect impact of animal health issues on market balance. The Union safety net does not aim to compensate for direct losses suffered by farmers due to natural disasters. In line with the goal of stabilising the Union agricultural markets, resources dedicated to promotion campaigns about Union farm products should continue in order to open up new market opportunities for the Union agricultural sector and increase the visibility and market share of its products both within the Union and internationally. | (41) A Unity Safety Net should be established to stabilize agricultural markets in times of market disturbances, in particular as a result of free trade agreements such as the one concluded with Mercosur, which runs counter to the interests of European farmers. It should be used to address periods and threats of market imbalance, including those caused by issues related to animal or plant health and in the event of natural disasters, which impact the prices of agricultural products and the costs of inputs in the whole or part of the internal market. In order to safeguard the Union’s strategic autonomy in food supply and ensure food security, the funding allocated for market support through the Unity Safety Net should take into account mounting uncertainties in agricultural markets and increased indirect impact of animal health issues on market balance. In line with the goal of stabilising the Union agricultural markets, resources dedicated to promotion campaigns about Union farm products should continue in order to open up new market opportunities for the Union agricultural sector and increase the visibility and market share of its products both within the Union and internationally. |
Or. fr
Amendment 1003
Eric Sargiacomo, Claire Fita
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41) A Unity Safety Net should be established to stabilize agricultural markets in times of market disturbances. It should be used to address periods and threats of market imbalance, including those caused by issues related to animal or plant health, which impact the prices of agricultural products and the costs of inputs in the whole or part of the internal market. In order to safeguard the Union’s strategic autonomy in food supply and ensure food security, the funding allocated for market support through the Unity Safety Net should take into account mounting uncertainties in agricultural markets and increased indirect impact of animal health issues on market balance. The Union safety net does not aim to compensate for direct losses suffered by farmers due to natural disasters. In line with the goal of stabilising the Union agricultural markets, resources dedicated to promotion campaigns about Union farm products should continue in order to open up new market opportunities for the Union agricultural sector and increase the visibility and market share of its products both within the Union and internationally. | (41) A Unity Safety Net should be established to stabilize agricultural markets in times of market disturbances. It should be used to address periods and threats of market imbalance, including those caused by issues related to animal or plant health, which impact the prices of agricultural products and the costs of inputs in the whole or part of the internal market. Guidelines will need to be drawn up to ensure a satisfactory degree of predictability for Member States and economic operators, and to maximise the effectiveness of the Unity Safety Net. In order to safeguard the Union’s strategic autonomy in food supply and ensure food security and sovereignty, the funding allocated for market support through the Unity Safety Net should take into account the structural instability in agricultural and aquatic food markets, the increasing concentration of other links in the food supply chain, the proliferation of trade agreements and increased indirect impact of animal health issues on market balance. The Union safety net does not aim to compensate for direct losses suffered by farmers due to natural disasters. |
Or. fr
Amendment 1004
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (41a) In order to significantly simplify procedures, Member States should include in their proposals of NRP Plans an assessment on the use of financial instruments, limited to a description of the identified market failure and the associated costing and including any possible combination with grant support. Therefore, national promotional banks and publicly-owned banks or financial institutions should be involved from the outset of the preparation of the Plan to ensure that financial instruments are effectively tailored to market needs and maximise their impact. |
Or. en
Amendment 1005
Ruggero Razza, Francesco Ventola, Denis Nesci, Antonella Sberna, Michele Picaro
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) With a view to ensuring consistency, the budgetary guarantee and financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in blending operations under the EU Facility should be implemented in accordance with Title X of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 and the [ECF Regulation] and with technical arrangements, terms and conditions established by the Commission for the purposes of its application. Support under the EU Facility in the form of a budgetary guarantee or financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in a blending operation, should be provided exclusively through the [ECF InvestEU Instrument]. To provide broader access to implementing partners for budgetary guarantees and financial instruments, the Commission should be able to conclude agreements in indirect management with all the categories of entities listed under Article 62(1), first subparagraph, point (c) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. To ensure sound financial management and budgetary discipline and to limit outstanding payments, the provisioning for the budgetary guarantee implemented under the EU Facility should not be committed after the end of the last year of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) and should be constituted by the end of the third year after the end of the MFF. Budgetary commitments for that provisioning should take into account the progress in granting the budgetary guarantee. The constitution of the provisioning should take into account the progress in the approval and signature of the financing and investment operations supporting the objectives of the EU Facility. | (42) With a view to ensuring consistency, the budgetary guarantee and financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in blending operations under the EU Facility should be implemented in accordance with Title X of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 and the [ECF Regulation] and with technical arrangements, terms and conditions established by the Commission for the purposes of its application. Support under the EU Facility in the form of a budgetary guarantee or financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in a blending operation, should be provided through the [ECF InvestEU Instrument] where possible. To provide broader access to implementing partners for budgetary guarantees and financial instruments, the Commission should be able to conclude agreements in indirect management with all the categories of entities listed under Article 62(1), first subparagraph, point (c) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. To ensure sound financial management and budgetary discipline and to limit outstanding payments, the provisioning for the budgetary guarantee implemented under the EU Facility should not be committed after the end of the last year of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) and should be constituted by the end of the third year after the end of the MFF. Budgetary commitments for that provisioning should take into account the progress in granting the budgetary guarantee. The constitution of the provisioning should take into account the progress in the approval and signature of the financing and investment operations supporting the objectives of the EU Facility. The performance framework will be implemented in a simpler fashion with a view to ensuring that these rules are applied in a manner that is proportionate to, and feasible and appropriate for, the use of budgetary guarantees and financial instruments. |
| 3 Regulation (EU, Euratom 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2509/oj). | 3 Regulation (EU, Euratom 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2509/oj). |
Or. it
Amendment 1006
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) With a view to ensuring consistency, the budgetary guarantee and financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in blending operations under the EU Facility should be implemented in accordance with Title X of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 and the [ECF Regulation] and with technical arrangements, terms and conditions established by the Commission for the purposes of its application. Support under the EU Facility in the form of a budgetary guarantee or financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in a blending operation, should be provided exclusively through the [ECF InvestEU Instrument]. To provide broader access to implementing partners for budgetary guarantees and financial instruments, the Commission should be able to conclude agreements in indirect management with all the categories of entities listed under Article 62(1), first subparagraph, point (c) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. To ensure sound financial management and budgetary discipline and to limit outstanding payments, the provisioning for the budgetary guarantee implemented under the EU Facility should not be committed after the end of the last year of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) and should be constituted by the end of the third year after the end of the MFF. Budgetary commitments for that provisioning should take into account the progress in granting the budgetary guarantee. The constitution of the provisioning should take into account the progress in the approval and signature of the financing and investment operations supporting the objectives of the EU Facility. | (42) With a view to ensuring consistency, the budgetary guarantee and financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in blending operations, thereby maximising the mobilisation of private capital and reducing structural dependence on grant-based financing under the EU Facility should be implemented in accordance with Title X of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 and the [ECF Regulation] and with technical arrangements, terms and conditions established by the Commission for the purposes of its application. Support under the EU Facility in the form of a budgetary guarantee or financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in a blending operation, should be provided exclusively through the [ECF InvestEU Instrument]. To provide broader access to implementing partners for budgetary guarantees and financial instruments, the Commission should be able to conclude agreements in indirect management with all the categories of entities listed under Article 62(1), first subparagraph, point (c) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. To ensure sound financial management and budgetary discipline and to limit outstanding payments, the provisioning for the budgetary guarantee implemented under the EU Facility should not be committed after the end of the last year of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) and should be constituted by the end of the third year after the end of the MFF. Budgetary commitments for that provisioning should take into account the progress in granting the budgetary guarantee. The constitution of the provisioning should take into account the progress in the approval and signature of the financing and investment operations supporting the objectives of the EU Facility. |
| 3 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2509/oj). | 3 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2509/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 1007
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (42) With a view to ensuring consistency, the budgetary guarantee and financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in blending operations under the EU Facility should be implemented in accordance with Title X of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 and the [ECF Regulation] and with technical arrangements, terms and conditions established by the Commission for the purposes of its application. Support under the EU Facility in the form of a budgetary guarantee or financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in a blending operation, should be provided exclusively through the [ECF InvestEU Instrument]. To provide broader access to implementing partners for budgetary guarantees and financial instruments, the Commission should be able to conclude agreements in indirect management with all the categories of entities listed under Article 62(1), first subparagraph, point (c) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509. To ensure sound financial management and budgetary discipline and to limit outstanding payments, the provisioning for the budgetary guarantee implemented under the EU Facility should not be committed after the end of the last year of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) and should be constituted by the end of the third year after the end of the MFF. Budgetary commitments for that provisioning should take into account the progress in granting the budgetary guarantee. The constitution of the provisioning should take into account the progress in the approval and signature of the financing and investment operations supporting the objectives of the EU Facility. | (42) With a view to ensuring consistency, the budgetary guarantee and financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in blending operations under the EU Facility should be implemented in accordance with Title X of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 and the [ECF Regulation] and with technical arrangements, terms and conditions established by the Commission for the purposes of its application. Support under the EU Facility in the form of a budgetary guarantee or financial instruments, including when combined with non-repayable support in a blending operation, should be provided exclusively through the [ECF InvestEU Instrument]. To provide broader access to implementing partners for budgetary guarantees and financial instruments, the Commission should be able to conclude agreements in indirect management with all the categories of entities listed under Article 62(1), first subparagraph, point (c) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, including the EIB Group. To ensure sound financial management and budgetary discipline and to limit outstanding payments, the provisioning for the budgetary guarantee implemented under the EU Facility should not be committed after the end of the last year of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) and should be constituted by the end of the third year after the end of the MFF. Budgetary commitments for that provisioning should take into account the progress in granting the budgetary guarantee. The constitution of the provisioning should take into account the progress in the approval and signature of the financing and investment operations supporting the objectives of the EU Facility. |
| 3 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2509/oj). | 3 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2509/oj). |
Or. en
Amendment 1008
Esther Herranz García, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Maravillas Abadía Jover
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) For a more impactful and efficient policy, the new CAP is simplified, with a streamlined set of interventions, and builds on the experience of the previous programming period. It simplifies the tools, avoiding fragmentation and enhancing the strategic approach by Member States. By using the synergies with other policies in the NRP Plan, additional tools should be available for the CAP to effectively contribute to developing a resilient, innovative, and environmentally responsible agricultural sector across Europe. | deleted |
Or. es
Amendment 1009
Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Julien Sanchez, André Rougé, Rody Tolassy, Angéline Furet
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) For a more impactful and efficient policy, the new CAP is simplified, with a streamlined set of interventions, and builds on the experience of the previous programming period. It simplifies the tools, avoiding fragmentation and enhancing the strategic approach by Member States. By using the synergies with other policies in the NRP Plan, additional tools should be available for the CAP to effectively contribute to developing a resilient, innovative, and environmentally responsible agricultural sector across Europe. | deleted |
Or. fr
Amendment 1010
Andrey Novakov, Karlo Ressler, Elsi Katainen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) For a more impactful and efficient policy, the new CAP is simplified, with a streamlined set of interventions, and builds on the experience of the previous programming period. It simplifies the tools, avoiding fragmentation and enhancing the strategic approach by Member States. By using the synergies with other policies in the NRP Plan, additional tools should be available for the CAP to effectively contribute to developing a resilient, innovative, and environmentally responsible agricultural sector across Europe. | deleted |
Or. en
Amendment 1011
Anouk Van Brug, Moritz Körner
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) For a more impactful and efficient policy, the new CAP is simplified, with a streamlined set of interventions, and builds on the experience of the previous programming period. It simplifies the tools, avoiding fragmentation and enhancing the strategic approach by Member States. By using the synergies with other policies in the NRP Plan, additional tools should be available for the CAP to effectively contribute to developing a resilient, innovative, and environmentally responsible agricultural sector across Europe. | (43) For a more impactful and efficient policy, the new CAP is simplified, with a streamlined set of interventions, and builds on the experience of the previous programming period. It simplifies the tools, avoiding fragmentation and enhancing the strategic approach by Member States. By using the synergies with other policies in the NRP Plan, additional tools should be available for the CAP to effectively contribute to developing a resilient, innovative, and environmentally responsible agricultural sector across Europe, gradually reducing market-distorting direct payments in favour of investment, innovation and productivity-enhancing measures that strengthen the long-term competitiveness of the agricultural sector |
Or. en
Amendment 1012
Barry Cowen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) For a more impactful and efficient policy, the new CAP is simplified, with a streamlined set of interventions, and builds on the experience of the previous programming period. It simplifies the tools, avoiding fragmentation and enhancing the strategic approach by Member States. By using the synergies with other policies in the NRP Plan, additional tools should be available for the CAP to effectively contribute to developing a resilient, innovative, and environmentally responsible agricultural sector across Europe. | (43) For a more impactful and efficient policy, the new CAP is simplified, with a streamlined set of interventions, and builds on the experience of the previous programming period. It simplifies the tools, avoiding fragmentation and enhancing the strategic approach by Member States. By using the synergies with other policies in the NRP Plan, additional tools should be available for the CAP to effectively contribute to developing a resilient, competitive, innovative, and an environmentally, economically and socially sustainable agricultural sector across Europe. |
Or. en
Amendment 1013
Damian Boeselager, Gordan Bosanac, David Cormand
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43) For a more impactful and efficient policy, the new CAP is simplified, with a streamlined set of interventions, and builds on the experience of the previous programming period. It simplifies the tools, avoiding fragmentation and enhancing the strategic approach by Member States. By using the synergies with other policies in the NRP Plan, additional tools should be available for the CAP to effectively contribute to developing a resilient, innovative, and environmentally responsible agricultural sector across Europe. | (43) For a more impactful and efficient policy, the revamped CAP is simplified, with a streamlined set of interventions, and builds on the experience of the previous programming period. It simplifies the tools, avoiding fragmentation and enhancing the strategic approach by Member States. By using the synergies with other policies in the NRP Plan, additional tools should be available for the CAP to effectively contribute to developing a resilient, modernised, and climate and environmentally responsible agricultural sector across Europe. |
Or. en
Amendment 1014
Esther Herranz García, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Elena Nevado del Campo, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Maravillas Abadía Jover
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43a) Those provisions defining elements and rules related to the implementation of the different policies covered under the Plans and further developed in their specific regulations should remain in the legal framework of relevant Union policies, including the common agricultural policy (CAP), with a view to ensuring legal certainty and a more coherent, harmonised and operational legal framework for policy-related measures. |
Or. es
Amendment 1015
Barry Cowen
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43 a (new)
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (43a) To ensure real simplification for farmers, it should be ensured that compliance with eligibility conditions and farm stewardship is primarily driven by incentives, guidance and correction rather than controls and sanctions. |
Or. en