Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

amendment list, 10 April 2026

Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union

Document CJ57-AM-786977 · (COM(2025)0847 – 2025/0847(COD))

Committee on Security and Defence Committee on Transport and Tourism

On Parliament’s site PDF Word

Full text

Jump to an amendment (367)
Text 2,296 paragraphs

Amendment 692

Flavio Tosi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. When priority access is granted to military transport under paragraph 1, no compensation shall be due to other affected transport users. Member States and infrastructure owners, operators and managers or, as the case may be, related services or facilities providers shall make all reasonable efforts to limit the impact of such priority access by, for example, offering alternative routes, slots, transport services or facilities as appropriate and depending on availabilities and inform the transport users as soon as possible.7. When priority access is granted to military transport under paragraph 1, no compensation shall be due to other affected transport users. Member States and infrastructure owners, operators and managers or, as the case may be, related services or facilities providers shall make all reasonable efforts to limit the impact of such priority access by, for example, offering alternative routes, slots, transport services or facilities as appropriate and depending on availabilities and inform the transport users as soon as possible. Member States shall take appropriate measures to minimise operational disruptions and may establish compensation mechanisms for transport users and infrastructure operators significantly affected by such measures.

Or. en

Amendment 693

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. When priority access is granted to military transport under paragraph 1, no compensation shall be due to other affected transport users. Member States and infrastructure owners, operators and managers or, as the case may be, related services or facilities providers shall make all reasonable efforts to limit the impact of such priority access by, for example, offering alternative routes, slots, transport services or facilities as appropriate and depending on availabilities and inform the transport users as soon as possible.7. When priority access is granted to military transport under paragraph 1, no compensation shall be due to other affected infrastructure managers, transport operators or transport users. Member States and infrastructure owners, operators and managers or, as the case may be, related services or facilities providers shall make all reasonable efforts to limit the impact of such priority access by, for example, offering alternative routes, slots, transport services or facilities as appropriate and depending on availabilities and inform the transport users as soon as possible.

Or. en

Read the rest (2,284 paragraphs)

Amendment 694

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. When priority access is granted to military transport under paragraph 1, no compensation shall be due to other affected transport users. Member States and infrastructure owners, operators and managers or, as the case may be, related services or facilities providers shall make all reasonable efforts to limit the impact of such priority access by, for example, offering alternative routes, slots, transport services or facilities as appropriate and depending on availabilities and inform the transport users as soon as possible.7. When priority access is granted to military transport under paragraph 1, no compensation shall be due to other affected transport users. Member States and infrastructure owners, operators and managers or, as the case may be, related services or facilities providers shall make all reasonable efforts to limit the impact of such priority access by, for example, offering alternative routes using ICT systems for transport as appropriate, slots, transport services or facilities as appropriate and depending on availabilities and inform the transport users as soon as possible.

Or. en

Amendment 695

Flavio Tosi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7 a. The activation of priority access measures under this Article shall comply with the principles of proportionality, temporariness and operational necessity. Member States shall ensure that such measures are applied only for the duration strictly required by the military transport operation.

Or. en

Amendment 696

Flavio Tosi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Where emergency measures have a significant impact on cross-border traffic, Member States, infrastructure owners, operators and managers or, as the case may be, related services or facilities providers, shall coordinate in order to limit impacts on traffic flow as much as possible.8. Where emergency measures have a significant impact on cross-border traffic, Member States, infrastructure owners, operators and managers or, as the case may be, related services or facilities providers, shall coordinate in order to limit impacts on traffic flow as much as possible, including through appropriate coordination with affected transport operators and multimodal freight terminals, with a view to minimising disruptions to cross-border passenger and freight transport and logistics supply chains.

Or. en

Amendment 697

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 a. Notwithstanding Articles 17 and 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 2021/782 of the European Parliament and of the Council, railway undertakings shall not be held liable, and no financial compensation or reimbursement shall be due to passengers in the event of a delay, a missed connection, or a cancellation directly and exclusively caused by the granting of priority access or other emergency measures taken pursuant to this Article during the period of activation of EMERS, provided that the railway undertaking could not reasonably have avoided the delay, missed connection, or cancellation.
Railway undertakings shall, however, ensure that they offer the passengers concerned appropriate re-routing or ticket exchange solutions as soon as possible, at no additional cost.
This paragraph is without prejudice to the obligations of railway undertakings under Articles 8, 18, and 20 of Regulation (EU) No. 2021/782 regarding passenger information, re-routing, and assistance, respectively.

Or. en

Amendment 698

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 a. By way of derogation from Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 2021/782, no compensation shall be payable by railway undertakings to passengers for delays, missed connections or cancellations that are directly and exclusively caused by priority access or other emergency measures granted pursuant to this Article during the period of activation of EMERS, provided that the railway undertaking could not reasonably have avoided the delay, missed connection or cancellation.
This paragraph shall be without prejudice to the obligations of railway undertakings under Articles 8 and 18 of Regulation (EU) No 2021/782 concerning passenger information and assistance.

Or. en

Amendment 699

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 a. By way of derogation from Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 2021/782, no compensation shall be payable by railway undertakings to passengers for delays, missed connections or cancellations that are directly and exclusively caused by priority access or other emergency measures granted pursuant to this Article during the period of activation of EMERS, provided that the railway undertaking could not reasonably have avoided the delay, missed connection or cancellation.
This paragraph shall be without prejudice to the obligations of railway undertakings under Articles 8 and 18 of Regulation (EU) No 2021/782 concerning passenger information and assistance.

Or. en

Amendment 700

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 a. By way of derogation from Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 2021/782, no compensation shall be payable by railway undertakings to passengers for delays, missed connections or cancellations that are directly and exclusively caused by priority access or other emergency measures granted pursuant to this Article during the period of activation of EMERS, provided that the railway undertaking could not reasonably have avoided the delay, missed connection or cancellation. This paragraph shall be without prejudice to the obligations of railway undertakings under Articles 8 and 18 of Regulation (EU) No 2021/782 concerning passenger information and assistance.

Or. en

Amendment 701

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 b. Notwithstanding any other provision of Union or national law, and regardless of any contractual provision or general conditions of carriage, no automatic right to compensation shall arise for customers of rail freight services in the event of delays, disruptions, or cancellations of such services resulting directly from measures taken in connection with the activation of EMERS. Railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall not be held liable for such disruptions.
However, Member States may provide for appropriate and proportionate mechanisms to cover the additional costs directly related to such disruptions, in accordance with Union law.
Railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall make reasonable efforts to mitigate the impact of such disruptions, in particular by offering alternative transport solutions or rerouting where possible, and shall inform the affected customers as soon as possible.

Or. en

Amendment 702

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 b. Notwithstanding any other provision of Union or national law, and irrespective of any contractual terms or general conditions of carriage, no entitlement to compensation shall arise for customers of rail freight transport services in relation to delays, interruptions or cancellations of such services that result directly from measures taken under the activation of EMERS.
Railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall not be held liable for any such disruptions. However, railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall make reasonable efforts to mitigate the impact of such disruptions, including by offering alternative transport options or rerouting where feasible, and shall inform affected customers as soon as possible.

Or. en

Amendment 703

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 b. Notwithstanding any other provision of Union or national law, and irrespective of any contractual terms or general conditions of carriage, no entitlement to compensation shall arise for customers of rail freight transport services in relation to delays, interruptions or cancellations of such services that result directly from measures taken under the activation of EMERS.
Railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall not be held liable for any such disruptions. However, railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall make reasonable efforts to mitigate the impact of such disruptions, including by offering alternative transport options or rerouting where feasible, and shall inform affected customers as soon as possible.

Or. en

Amendment 704

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks

Proposal for a regulation

Article 21 – paragraph 8 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 b. Notwithstanding any other provision of Union or national law, and irrespective of any contractual terms or general conditions of carriage, no entitlement to compensation shall arise for customers of rail freight transport services in relation to delays, interruptions or cancellations of such services that result directly from measures taken under the activation of EMERS. Railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall not be held liable for any such disruptions. However, railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall make reasonable efforts to mitigate the impact of such disruptions, including by offering alternative transport options or rerouting where feasible, and shall inform affected customers as soon as possible.

Or. en

Amendment 705

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. Where exemptions granted under this Article result in the use of civilian logistics infrastructures for the transit or temporary storage of military dangerous goods, Member States shall ensure that appropriate financial support or compensation mechanisms are available to cover the additional costs related to security, infrastructure adaptation and insurance.

Or. en

Justification

The handling of military dangerous goods may generate significant additional costs for civilian infrastructure operators, including investments in security systems, insurance coverage and operational adjustments. Dedicated EU financial support may be necessary, as civilian logistics infrastructures cannot reasonably be expected to absorb the operational, security and financial implications of military dangerous goods transport without appropriate public support.

Amendment 706

Flavio Tosi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. Where exemptions granted under this Article result in the use of civilian logistics infrastructures for the transit or temporary storage of military dangerous goods, Member States shall ensure that appropriate financial support or compensation mechanisms are available to cover the additional costs related to security, infrastructure adaptation and insurance.

Or. en

Amendment 707

Flavio Tosi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Member States concerned by the military transport shall coordinate any exemptions granted in accordance with this Article and promptly inform other Member States thereof through the Military Mobility Transport Group.2. Member States concerned by the military transport shall coordinate any exemptions granted in accordance with this Article and promptly inform other Member States thereof through the Military Mobility Transport Group, while ensuring that infrastructure operators are adequately informed of operational and safety implications related to such exemptions.

Or. en

Amendment 708

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 23 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Abnormal military transport by road during the period of activation of EMERSMilitary transport by road during the period of activation of EMERS

Or. en

Amendment 709

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 23 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport by road carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum weights or dimensions set out in Annex I to Directive 96/53/EC shall be permitted irrespective of whether the load is indivisible or not, without prejudice to any necessary traffic arrangements.During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport by road carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum weights or dimensions set out in Annex I to Directive 96/53/EC shall be permitted irrespective of whether the load is indivisible or not, without prejudice to any necessary traffic arrangements laid down by the competent authority in accordance with national law.

Or. it

Justification

EMERS aims to speed up traffic flow, but road safety and traffic management remain essential aspects. This amendment serves to clarify that traffic arrangements may still be imposed under national law to ensure operational control (escorts, time slots, route restrictions). This is also in line with the position paper's emphasis on mitigating the impact on traffic and civilian infrastructure, whilst enabling rapid military mobility.

Amendment 710

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 23 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport by road carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations which exceed the maximum weights or dimensions set out in Annex I to Directive 96/53/EC shall be permitted irrespective of whether the load is indivisible or not, without prejudice to any necessary traffic arrangements.During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport by road carried out by vehicles or vehicle combinations corresponding with the characteristics of Article 4(3) and 4(4) of Directive 96/53/EC shall be permitted irrespective of whether the load is indivisible or not, without prejudice to any necessary traffic arrangements.

Or. en

Justification

This Regulation should remain fully compatible with Directive 96/53/EC, as amended, which currently only considers vehicles falling under Article 4(3) as abnormal load vehicles. Its scope should therefore not be limited to such vehicles. Other types of high-capacity vehicles should also be taken into account for military transport and should not be subject to the same rules as vehicles used for abnormal transport of indivisible loads. These include vehicles that do not comply with the characteristics set out in Annex I of Directive 96/53/EC, as well as those operating under the “modular concept”.

Amendment 711

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 24 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall activate enhanced protection measures in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards and threats and to ensure their effective operation at all times.During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall activate enhanced protection measures (including cybersecurity measures and measures to safeguard telecommunications) in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards and threats and to ensure their effective operation at all times. A transitional period shall begin on the date of entry into force of this Regulation to give Member States time to implement these protective measures.

Or. it

Justification

Enhanced protective measures under EMERS must cover both physical and digital dependencies (cybersecurity and telecommunications) to ensure the continuity of critical transport operations. A transitional period is needed to implement the technical and organisational measures in a realistic manner, thereby avoiding immediate non-compliance and ensuring effective protection rather than imposing a purely pro forma obligation.

Amendment 712

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 24 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall activate enhanced protection measures in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards and threats and to ensure their effective operation at all times.During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall activate enhanced protection measures in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards and threats and to ensure their effective operation at all times.
Member States may, where appropriate, make use of Union financial instruments to mitigate the economic impacts resulting from the implementation of these measures.

Or. en

Amendment 713

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 24 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall activate enhanced protection measures in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards and threats and to ensure their effective operation at all times.During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall activate enhanced protection measures in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards, threats and cyber risks, to prevent interference and to ensure their effective operation at all times.

Or. en

Amendment 714

Wouter Beke, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 24 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall activate enhanced protection measures in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards and threats and to ensure their effective operation at all times.During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall be responsible by all means to activate enhanced protection measures in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards and threats and to ensure their effective operation at all times.

Or. en

Amendment 715

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 24 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall activate enhanced protection measures in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards and threats and to ensure their effective operation at all times.During the period of activation of EMERS, Member States shall activate enhanced protection measures referred to in article 34 in relation to the strategic dual-use infrastructure located on their territories, identified in accordance with Article 33, to protect them, to make them resilient against all hazards and threats and to ensure their effective operation at all times.

Or. en

Amendment 716

Stanislav Stoyanov, Volker Schnurrbusch, Milan Mazurek, Siegbert Frank Droese

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. During the period of activation of EMERS, and if the Solidarity Pool referred to in Article 35 is operational, the Commission, taking into account the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group, may identify specific capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool that are urgently needed to support certain Member States. In such cases, requests for those capabilities from the affected Member States and Member States that support military transport operations for the affected Member States shall be given priority consideration.deleted
The sharing and coordination efforts under the Solidarity Pool referred to in Article 35 shall focus on supporting those priority requests, ensuring that the required capabilities are made available in a timely and efficient manner.
Where Member States’ capabilities have been acquired, contracted or purchased, after the entry into force of this Regulation, with the financing support of any Union funding and could support priority requests in accordance with the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the Member States shall not invoke the exceptional situation requiring the use of their capabilities, referred to in Article 35(10) and (11).

Or. en

Amendment 717

Stanislav Stoyanov, Volker Schnurrbusch, Milan Mazurek, Siegbert Frank Droese

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, and if the Solidarity Pool referred to in Article 35 is operational, the Commission, taking into account the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group, may identify specific capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool that are urgently needed to support certain Member States. In such cases, requests for those capabilities from the affected Member States and Member States that support military transport operations for the affected Member States shall be given priority consideration.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 718

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, and if the Solidarity Pool referred to in Article 35 is operational, the Commission, taking into account the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group, may identify specific capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool that are urgently needed to support certain Member States. In such cases, requests for those capabilities from the affected Member States and Member States that support military transport operations for the affected Member States shall be given priority consideration.During the period of activation of EMERS, and if the Solidarity Pool referred to in Article 35 is operational, the Commission shall coordinate the implementation of the EMERS system, in close cooperation with the Member States and with the involvement of the competent bodies, in particular the Group on Transport related to military mobility, the European Defence Agency and the General Staff of the European Union. To that end, The Commission may identify specific capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool that are urgently needed to support certain Member States. In such cases, requests for those capabilities from the affected Member States and Member States that support military transport operations for the affected Member States shall be given priority consideration.

Or. en

Amendment 719

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, and if the Solidarity Pool referred to in Article 35 is operational, the Commission, taking into account the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group, may identify specific capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool that are urgently needed to support certain Member States. In such cases, requests for those capabilities from the affected Member States and Member States that support military transport operations for the affected Member States shall be given priority consideration.During the period of activation of EMERS, and once the Solidarity Pool referred to in Article 35 is operational, the Commission, taking into account the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group, may identify specific capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool that are urgently needed to support certain Member States. In such cases, requests for those capabilities from the affected Member States and Member States that support military transport operations for the affected Member States shall be given priority consideration.

Or. en

Amendment 720

Stanislav Stoyanov, Volker Schnurrbusch, Milan Mazurek, Siegbert Frank Droese

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The sharing and coordination efforts under the Solidarity Pool referred to in Article 35 shall focus on supporting those priority requests, ensuring that the required capabilities are made available in a timely and efficient manner.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 721

Vangelis Meimarakis, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where Member States’ capabilities have been acquired, contracted or purchased, after the entry into force of this Regulation, with the financing support of any Union funding and could support priority requests in accordance with the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the Member States shall not invoke the exceptional situation requiring the use of their capabilities, referred to in Article 35(10) and (11).Where Member States’ capabilities have been acquired, contracted or purchased, after the entry into force of this Regulation, with the financing support of any Union funding and could support priority requests in accordance with the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the Member States may invoke the exceptional situation requiring the use of their capabilities, referred to in Article 35(10) and (11).

Or. en

Amendment 722

Stanislav Stoyanov, Volker Schnurrbusch, Milan Mazurek, Siegbert Frank Droese

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Commission may assist the Member States in contracting any relevant transport and logistic capabilities.2. The Commission may assist the Member States in contracting relevant transport and logistic capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 723

Stanislav Stoyanov, Volker Schnurrbusch, Milan Mazurek, Siegbert Frank Droese

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The Commission may contract any relevant transport and logistic capabilities, following the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group.3. The Commission may contract relevant transport and logistic capabilities, following the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group.

Or. en

Amendment 724

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Before any additional transport capacity is contracted under this Regulation, the Military Mobility Transport Group shall establish clear, Union-wide criteria for the eligibility of private companies to participate in military transport contracts. These criteria shall include, at a minimum, a physical presence, a high level of compliance with social security and safety requirements, and a security vetting process. With regard to the road transport of goods and passengers, in order to ensure the safety and security of military transport operations, only civilian road transport operators that are fully compliant with applicable Union rules, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2020/1055, shall be contracted by the armed forces of Member States to carry out military transport. To that end, the European Register of Road Transport Undertakings (ERRU) shall include a separate section dedicated exclusively to civilian road transport operators carrying out military transport. This will facilitate the monitoring of compliance with the rules and exemptions. Any contracting carried out in accordance with Articles 25 and 39 shall comply with these criteria.

Or. en

Amendment 725

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Prior to any contracting of extra capabilities under this Regulation, the Military Mobility Transport Group shall agree on clear criteria, applicable throughout the Union, for eligibility for military transport contracts for private companies. Any contracting done in accordance with articles 25 and 39 shall comply with these criteria, which shall cover at least the existing requirements regarding establishment, high social security, safety compliance and security vetting.

Or. en

Amendment 726

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Member States and commercial operators owning or operating the capabilities which might be used to perform a military transport operation under the activation of EMERS, shall ensure that the personnel operating them have received adequate medical checks, training, reskilling and upskilling programmes free of charge enabling them to carry out the transport of dangerous goods and to perform military transport operations during the period of activation of EMERS.

Or. en

Amendment 727

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 26 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Exemption of military transport operations by road from cabotage rules during the period of activation of EMERSExemption of military transport operations by road from market access rules during the period of activation of EMERS.

Or. en

Amendment 728

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 26 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport carried out by civilian operators shall be exempted from the restrictions on cabotage operations laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009, and from restrictions on the duration and frequency of cabotage operations carried out in the context of road passenger transport services.During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport carried out by civilian operators shall be exempted from the restrictions on cabotage operations laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009, and from restrictions on the duration and frequency of cabotage operations carried out in the context of road passenger transport services. The restrictions on cabotage operation during the period of activation of EMERS are authorized only within the territory of the Member State or Member States requesting the activation of EMERS and the Member States directly affected by the route of the military transport. Other Member States may grant unrestricted access to military transport carried out by civilian operators if they deem it necessary and proportionate to the level of urgency

Or. en

Amendment 729

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 26 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport carried out by civilian operators shall be exempted from the restrictions on cabotage operations laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009, and from restrictions on the duration and frequency of cabotage operations carried out in the context of road passenger transport services.During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport carried out by civilian operators shall be exempted from the restrictions on cabotage operations laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009, and from restrictions on the duration and frequency of cabotage operations carried out in the context of road passenger transport services. These exemptions may be limited by the Commission in its proposal for implementing act to only some Member States, in accordance to the territorial nature of the concerned EMERS procedure.

Or. en

Amendment 730

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 26 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport carried out by civilian operators shall be exempted from the restrictions on cabotage operations laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009, and from restrictions on the duration and frequency of cabotage operations carried out in the context of road passenger transport services.During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport carried out by civilian operators shall be exempted from the restrictions on cabotage operations and/or the quantitative restrictions laid down respectively in Article 8 and Article 10(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009, and from restrictions on the duration and frequency of cabotage operations carried out in the context of road passenger transport services.

Or. en

Amendment 731

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 26 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport carried out by civilian operators shall be exempted from the restrictions on cabotage operations laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009, and from restrictions on the duration and frequency of cabotage operations carried out in the context of road passenger transport services.During the period of activation of EMERS, military transport carried out by civilian operators shall be exempted from the restrictions on cabotage operations and/or the quantitative restrictions laid down respectively in Article 8 and Article 10(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009, and from restrictions on the duration and frequency of cabotage operations carried out in the context of road passenger transport services.

Or. en

Amendment 732

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – title

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Derogations from rules on driving time and rest periods for military transport operations during the period of activation of EMERSDerogations from rules on driving time and rest periods and working time for military transport operations during the period of activation of EMERS

Or. en

Amendment 733

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. During the period of activation of EMERS, the following derogations from driving times, breaks and rest periods laid down in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply to military transport operations carried out by civilian operators:1. During the period of activation of EMERS, the following derogations from driving times, breaks and rest periods laid down in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply to military transport operations carried out by civilian operators, provided they are directly and verifiably linked to the specific military operation that justifies them:

Or. en

Amendment 734

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. During the period of activation of EMERS, the following derogations from driving times, breaks and rest periods laid down in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply to military transport operations carried out by civilian operators:1. During the period of activation of EMERS, the following derogations from driving times, breaks and rest periods laid down in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply to military transport operations carried out by civilian operators, which must be directly related to the specific military operation that justifies them :

Or. en

Amendment 735

Asger Christensen, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. During the period of activation of EMERS, the following derogations from driving times, breaks and rest periods laid down in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply to military transport operations carried out by civilian operators:1. During the period of activation of EMERS, the same rules regarding driving times, breaks and rest periods and working time shall apply to military transport operations carried out by civilian operators as those applicable to military transport operations undertaken directly by the armed forces.

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 736

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. During the period of activation of EMERS, the following derogations from driving times, breaks and rest periods laid down in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply to military transport operations carried out by civilian operators:1. During the period of activation of EMERS, the same rules regarding driving times, breaks and rest periods and working time shall apply to military transport operations carried out by civilian operators as those applicable to military transport operations undertaken directly by the armed forces.

Or. en

Amendment 737

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) by way of derogation from Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the daily driving time of 9 hours shall be extended to 11 hours twice during the week;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 738

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) by way of derogation from Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the daily driving time of 9 hours shall be extended to 11 hours twice during the week;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 739

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) by way of derogation from Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the weekly driving time of 56 hours shall be extended to 60 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 740

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) by way of derogation from Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the weekly driving time of 56 hours shall be extended to 60 hours;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 741

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) by way of derogation from Article 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the total accumulated driving time during any two consecutive weeks shall be extended from 90 hours to 96 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 742

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) by way of derogation from Article 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the total accumulated driving time during any two consecutive weeks shall be extended from 90 hours to 96 hours;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 743

Özlem Demirel, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) by way of derogation from Article 7, first paragraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the driving period of four and a half hours after which the driver is required to take an uninterrupted break of not less than 45 minutes shall be increased up to five and a half hours. The break may be replaced by three breaks of 15 minutes each distributed in such a way as to comply with the provision of Article 7, first paragraph, of that Regulation;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 744

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) by way of derogation from Article 7, first paragraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the driving period of four and a half hours after which the driver is required to take an uninterrupted break of not less than 45 minutes shall be increased up to five and a half hours. The break may be replaced by three breaks of 15 minutes each distributed in such a way as to comply with the provision of Article 7, first paragraph, of that Regulation;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 745

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) by way of derogation from Article 7, first paragraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the driving period of four and a half hours after which the driver is required to take an uninterrupted break of not less than 45 minutes shall be increased up to five and a half hours. The break may be replaced by three breaks of 15 minutes each distributed in such a way as to comply with the provision of Article 7, first paragraph, of that Regulation;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 746

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) by way of derogation from Article 7, first paragraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the driving period of four and a half hours after which the driver is required to take an uninterrupted break of not less than 45 minutes shall be increased up to five and a half hours. The break may be replaced by three breaks of 15 minutes each distributed in such a way as to comply with the provision of Article 7, first paragraph, of that Regulation;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 747

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) by way of derogation from Article 7, first paragraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the driving period of four and a half hours after which the driver is required to take an uninterrupted break of not less than 45 minutes shall be increased up to five and a half hours. The break may be replaced by three breaks of 15 minutes each distributed in such a way as to comply with the provision of Article 7, first paragraph, of that Regulation;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 748

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) by way of derogation from Article 8(2), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the daily rest period of 9 hours shall be regarded as a reduced daily rest period;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 749

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) by way of derogation from Article 8(2), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the daily rest period of 9 hours shall be regarded as a reduced daily rest period;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 750

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) by way of derogation from Article 8(6), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, in any two consecutive weeks a driver may take two reduced weekly rest periods of at least of 24 hours. When use is made of this derogation, the start of the weekly rest period referred to in Article 8(6), second subparagraph, of that Regulation may be postponed beyond the end of six 24-hour periods from the end of the previous weekly rest period, without however exceeding 12 periods of 24 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 751

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) by way of derogation from Article 8(6), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, in any two consecutive weeks a driver may take two reduced weekly rest periods of at least of 24 hours. When use is made of this derogation, the start of the weekly rest period referred to in Article 8(6), second subparagraph, of that Regulation may be postponed beyond the end of six 24-hour periods from the end of the previous weekly rest period, without however exceeding 12 periods of 24 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 752

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) by way of derogation from Article 8(6), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, in any two consecutive weeks a driver may take two reduced weekly rest periods of at least of 24 hours. When use is made of this derogation, the start of the weekly rest period referred to in Article 8(6), second subparagraph, of that Regulation may be postponed beyond the end of six 24-hour periods from the end of the previous weekly rest period, without however exceeding 12 periods of 24 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 753

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) by way of derogation from Article 8(6), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, in any two consecutive weeks a driver may take two reduced weekly rest periods of at least of 24 hours. When use is made of this derogation, the start of the weekly rest period referred to in Article 8(6), second subparagraph, of that Regulation may be postponed beyond the end of six 24-hour periods from the end of the previous weekly rest period, without however exceeding 12 periods of 24 hours;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 754

Özlem Demirel, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) by way of derogation from Article 8(6), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, in any two consecutive weeks a driver may take two reduced weekly rest periods of at least of 24 hours. When use is made of this derogation, the start of the weekly rest period referred to in Article 8(6), second subparagraph, of that Regulation may be postponed beyond the end of six 24-hour periods from the end of the previous weekly rest period, without however exceeding 12 periods of 24 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 755

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g) by way of derogation from Article 8(6b) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, any reduction in the weekly rest period shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken before the end of the twelfth week following the week in question, either en bloc or as two rest periods, one of them being of at least 45 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 756

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g) by way of derogation from Article 8(6b) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, any reduction in the weekly rest period shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken before the end of the twelfth week following the week in question, either en bloc or as two rest periods, one of them being of at least 45 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 757

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g) by way of derogation from Article 8(6b) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, any reduction in the weekly rest period shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken before the end of the twelfth week following the week in question, either en bloc or as two rest periods, one of them being of at least 45 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 758

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g) by way of derogation from Article 8(6b) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, any reduction in the weekly rest period shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken before the end of the twelfth week following the week in question, either en bloc or as two rest periods, one of them being of at least 45 hours;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 759

Özlem Demirel, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g) by way of derogation from Article 8(6b) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, any reduction in the weekly rest period shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken before the end of the twelfth week following the week in question, either en bloc or as two rest periods, one of them being of at least 45 hours;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 760

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point h

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(h) by way of derogation from Article 8(8) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest period of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest periods may be taken in a vehicle, provided that the vehicle is safely parked and has adequate conditions for the rest;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 761

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point h

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(h) by way of derogation from Article 8(8) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest period of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest periods may be taken in a vehicle, provided that the vehicle is safely parked and has adequate conditions for the rest;deleted

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 762

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point h

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(h) by way of derogation from Article 8(8) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest period of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest periods may be taken in a vehicle, provided that the vehicle is safely parked and has adequate conditions for the rest;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 763

Özlem Demirel, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point h

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(h) by way of derogation from Article 8(8) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest period of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest periods may be taken in a vehicle, provided that the vehicle is safely parked and has adequate conditions for the rest;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 764

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point h

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(h) by way of derogation from Article 8(8) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest period of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest periods may be taken in a vehicle, provided that the vehicle is safely parked and has adequate conditions for the rest;deleted

Or. en

Amendment 765

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point i

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) by way of derogation from Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the permitted period of interruption where a driver accompanies a vehicle which is transported by ferry or train and takes a regular daily rest period or a reduced weekly rest period in a sleeper cabin, bunk or couchette shall be increased from one to two hours.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 766

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point i

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) by way of derogation from Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, the permitted period of interruption where a driver accompanies a vehicle which is transported by ferry or train and takes a regular daily rest period or a reduced weekly rest period in a sleeper cabin, bunk or couchette shall be increased from one to two hours.deleted

Or. en

Justification

Differences between driving and rest time rules, as well as working time rules, for transports involving military personnel and/or vehicles and those involving civilian personnel and/or vehicles should be eliminated. The introduction of derogations risks complicating enforcement, particularly during roadside checks, and should therefore be avoided. It is also important to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to a minimum.

Amendment 767

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. Member States shall, where appropriate, encourage the implementation of appropriate preparedness measures by the operators concerned, with a view to facilitating adaptation to the derogations provided for in this Article, in particular with regard to occupational health and safety and in consultation with the social partners.

Or. en

Amendment 768

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 b. When activating EMERS, Member States shall take into account the need to ensure the continuity of essential civilian transport flows, in particular those related to the supply of essential goods, energy, medicines, and strategic goods, and shall endeavor, to the extent possible, to limit disruptions in this regard.

Or. en

Amendment 769

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The use of the derogations laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be without prejudice to the maximum working times under Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council35 .deleted
35 (36)Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 35, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2002/15/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 770

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The use of the derogations laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be without prejudice to the maximum working times under Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council35 .2. Unnecessary roadside checks of civilian vehicles carrying out military transports must be avoided. The Commission should propose a harmonised system able to flag such vehicles on the road and to prove compliance with driving time, rest periods, breaks and working time.
35 (36)Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 35, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2002/15/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 771

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Unnecessary roadside checks of civilian vehicles carrying out military transports must be avoided. The Commission should propose a harmonised system able to flag such vehicles on the road and to prove compliance with driving time, rest periods, breaks and working time.

Or. en

Amendment 772

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. For the purpose of roadside checks, the driver shall be able to produce, whenever an authorised control officer so requests, the record sheets and any manual records and printouts for the current day and the previous days that justify the use of the derogations.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 773

Asger Christensen, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. For the purpose of roadside checks, the driver shall be able to produce, whenever an authorised control officer so requests, the record sheets and any manual records and printouts for the current day and the previous days that justify the use of the derogations.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 774

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. For the purpose of roadside checks, the driver shall be able to produce, whenever an authorised control officer so requests, the record sheets and any manual records and printouts for the current day and the previous days that justify the use of the derogations.3. For the purpose of roadside checks, the driver shall be able to produce, whenever an authorised control officer so requests, the record sheets and any manual records and printouts for the current day and the previous days that justify the use of the derogations. However, the civil transport operator carrying out the military transport operation on behalf of a Member State armed forces shall be the legal entity in charge of providing authorised control officers with the evidence that justify the use of the derogations.

Or. en

Amendment 775

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. For the purpose of roadside checks, the driver shall be able to produce, whenever an authorised control officer so requests, the record sheets and any manual records and printouts for the current day and the previous days that justify the use of the derogations.3. For the purpose of roadside checks, the driver shall be able to produce, whenever an authorised control officer so requests, the record sheets and any manual records and printouts for the current day and the previous days that justify the use of the derogations. To enable faster and more consistent checks, these forms and printouts should follow standardised templates and/or guidelines that are harmonised at European level.

Or. it

Amendment 776

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. For the purpose of roadside checks, the driver shall be able to produce, whenever an authorised control officer so requests, the record sheets and any manual records and printouts for the current day and the previous days that justify the use of the derogations.3. For the purpose of roadside checks, in addition to the monitoring requirements set forth in the relevant Union legislation on road transport, civilian road transport operators contracted by the armed forces of Member States to carry out military transport operations shall provide all necessary evidence justifying the use of the exemptions and attesting to the military nature of the transport operation.

Or. en

Amendment 777

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. For the purpose of roadside checks carried out in accordance with paragraph 3 and for the exchange of information collected during such checks, the police authorities of the Member States shall use interoperable softwares and IT tools.

Or. en

Amendment 778

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. The European Commission monitors the impact of the exemptions on road safety, on the health and safety of drivers, and on the attractiveness of the driving profession.

Or. en

Amendment 779

Özlem Demirel, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. The European Commission shall monitor the impact of the above derogations on road safety, driver health and safety, and attractiveness to the driver profession.

Or. en

Amendment 780

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. The European Commission shall monitor the impact of the above derogations on road safety, driver health and safety, and attractiveness to the driver profession.

Or. en

Amendment 781

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 28 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Operations of the vehicles referred to in paragraph 1 shall be carried out in agreement between the concerned infrastructure managers and railway undertakings, in compliance with each of their safety management system as set out under Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council36and, where relevant, in accordance with Article 10(9) of that Directive.2. Operations of the vehicles referred to in paragraph 1 shall be carried out in agreement between the concerned infrastructure managers and railway undertakings, in compliance with each of their safety management system as set out under Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council36 and, where relevant, in accordance with Article 10(9) of that Directive. EMERS should further be implemented in a manner consistent with the procedures for the authorisation of rolling stock and the technical specifications for interoperability (TSIs).
36 (37)Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (OJ L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 102, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/798/oj).36 Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (OJ L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 102, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/798/oj).

Or. it

Justification

The flexibility of EMERS should not compromise requirements for safety and railway interoperability. The explicit reference to authorisation procedures and TSIs, and the definition of any extended areas of use in the EMERS implementing act, ensure legal certainty and controlled operating conditions across all networks during emergency activation.

Amendment 782

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks

Proposal for a regulation

Article 28 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Operations of the vehicles referred to in paragraph 1 shall be carried out in agreement between the concerned infrastructure managers and railway undertakings, in compliance with each of their safety management system as set out under Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council36 and, where relevant, in accordance with Article 10(9) of that Directive.2. Operations of the vehicles referred to in paragraph 1 shall be carried out in agreement between the concerned infrastructure managers and railway undertakings, in compliance with each of their safety management system as set out under Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council 36and, where relevant, in accordance with Article 10(9) of that Directive. Furthermore, the activation of EMERS should be also conducted in compliance with the authorisation procedures of rolling stocks and Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs).
36 (37)Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (OJ L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 102, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/798/oj).36 (37)Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (OJ L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 102, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/798/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 783

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks

Proposal for a regulation

Article 28 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The extended area of use is defined in the implementing act to activate EMERS.

Or. en

Amendment 784

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 28 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2a. The extended area of use shall be defined in the implementing act covering EMERS.

Or. it

Amendment 785

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Where military transport operations involve the transition from the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) to local infrastructure at the extremities of military mobility corridors (the ‘last mile’), Member States shall take into account that such operations may involve the movement of heavy military equipment exceeding standard civilian load classes, including Military Load Class (MLC) 80. Such transitions may result in the use of local infrastructure, including secondary and regional bridges, which may not be designed to withstand such loads. Member States shall therefore assess the capacity and resilience of such infrastructure and, where necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure the continuity and safety of military transport operations. During the activation of EMERS, and for the purposes of ensuring the effective execution of military transport operations, including in the context of the ‘last mile’, military engineering units of the armed forces shall, where necessary, be exempted from the obligation to obtain prior civil administrative permits, including water management, construction and environmental permits, for the installation of temporary infrastructure, including temporary crossings and modular bridges, in accordance with national law and without prejudice to essential environmental protection requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 786

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Member States shall take the necessary measures to facilitate military transport operations across all modes of transport, including rail, waterways, ports, and airports, by lifting, where necessary and proportionate, any restrictions that might hinder their implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 787

Özlem Demirel, Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 29 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Framework contingency plans for occupational health and safety shall be prepared at workplace level, with full participation of Trade Unions, to prepare adaptation to derogations and exemptions foreseen under EMERS.

Or. en

Amendment 788

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
These exemptions also apply to any other relevant provisions of Union law concerning official controls at entry into the Union, in so far as this is necessary to ensure efficient and expeditious military transport operations.

Or. en

Amendment 789

Christophe Gomart, Isabelle Le Callennec

Proposal for a regulation

Article 31 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The European Union Customs Authority, as set out in Title XII of Regulation [customs reform], in consultation with the Commission shall prepare procedures and protocols referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article for the implementation of action in the event of the activation of EMERS as defined under Article 19.2. The European Union Customs Authority, as set out in Title XII of Regulation [customs reform], in consultation with the Commission shall prepare procedures and protocols referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article for the implementation of action in the event of the activation of EMERS as defined under Article 19. The Commission may be involved in an advisory capacity for the technical aspects, without being involved in operational decisions.

Or. fr

Amendment 790

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 31 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article31a
War-risk insurance coverage during the period of activation of EMERS
Member States shall take the necessary measures to incentivise the provision, for a reasonable cost, of insurance schemes against war and natural disaster risks in the whole Union to civil companies carrying out military transport operations on behalf of their armed forces and to their shipments, during the period of activation of EMERS.

Or. en

Amendment 791

Özlem Demirel, Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 31 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article31a
Protection of collective industrial action
Where Member States take measures to implement EMERS, such as under article 24, the fundamental right to collective industrial action shall not be restricted.

Or. en

Amendment 792

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Member States shall upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:1. Member States shall upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, provided that these requirements are clearly defined, shared with the relevant infrastructure managers and do not impinge upon national investment planning priorities, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:

Or. it

Justification

We need to clarify whether the requirements set out in Annex II correspond to existing TEN-T standards or call for higher levels of service. Unclear or ever-changing standards could have a significant effect on national investment planning and access to EU funding.

Amendment 793

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Member States shall upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:1. Member States shall upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects, in line with the priorities set out in the work programs of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) :

Or. en

Amendment 794

Christophe Gomart, Isabelle Le Callennec

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Member States shall upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:1. Member States shall upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach, within their national responsibilities and on the basis of voluntary cooperation between Member States. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:

Or. fr

Amendment 795

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Member States shall upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:1. Member States shall upgrade, with the support of Union funding where possible, the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority and where possible by 2030, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:

Or. en

Amendment 796

Petras Auštrevičius, Valérie Devaux, Engin Eroglu, Lucia Yar, Bart Groothuis, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Member States shall upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:1. Member States shall ensure and, where necessary, upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:

Or. en

Amendment 797

Rasa Juknevičienė, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Member States shall upgrade the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors to the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. When upgrading those dual-use sections of the military mobility corridors, Member States shall prioritise the following projects:1. Member States shall ensure that the dual-use infrastructure identified as part of the military mobility corridors meets the transport infrastructure requirements defined in Annex II to the Council Military Requirements as a matter of priority, and in a coordinated and synchronised approach. To achieve the goals of this parahraph, the following projects shall be prioritised:

Or. en

Justification

“Upgrade” is restrictive, as projects may include other actions than strict infrastructure upgrade, in particular in case of missing links or bottlenecks. The last part of the paragraph is simplified and made consistent, for example, preference is to refer to “infrastructure” as in the first sentence and not to “sections” as in the second sentence of the initial proposal.

Amendment 798

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński, Roberts Zīle, Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) ensuring continuity of the transport network, by closing missing links and removing important bottlenecks to military transport;(a) ensuring continuity of the transport network, by closing missing links and removing important bottlenecks to military transport, including at the extremities of the military mobility corridors in the Union, in order to enable smooth cross-border movements with close partners;

Or. en

Amendment 799

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Reinis Pozņaks, Kosma Złotowski, Marion Maréchal, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) ensuring continuity of the transport network, by closing missing links and removing important bottlenecks to military transport;(a) ensuring continuity of the transport network, by closing missing links and removing important bottlenecks to military transport and, where appropriate, developing new dual-use infrastructure to ensure full operational continuity;

Or. en

Amendment 800

Petras Auštrevičius, Valérie Devaux, Engin Eroglu, Lucia Yar, Bart Groothuis, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) ensuring continuity of the transport network, by closing missing links and removing important bottlenecks to military transport;(a) ensuring continuity and completion of the transport network, notably priority military mobility corridors, by closing missing links and removing bottlenecks to military transport;

Or. en

Amendment 801

Rasa Juknevičienė, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) ensuring continuity of the transport network, by closing missing links and removing important bottlenecks to military transport;(a) ensuring continuity and completion of the military mobility corridors by eliminating missing links and removing bottlenecks to military transport;

Or. en

Justification

The goal is to complete the military mobility corridors and to ensure their smooth functioning.

Amendment 802

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) ensuring interoperability of the transport network, including by migrating to European nominal standard railway gauge;(b) ensuring interoperability of the transport network, including by migrating to European nominal standard railway gauge, while ensuring that, during the transition period, existing 1520 mm gauge infrastructure of strategic importance for military mobility remains operational and eligible for dual-use investment;

Or. en

Amendment 803

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) ensuring interoperability of the transport network, including by migrating to European nominal standard railway gauge;(b) ensuring interoperability of the transport network, including by migrating to European nominal standard railway gauge, to an axle load of at least 22.5 tonnes, to the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and to the tunnel military gauge;

Or. en

Amendment 804

Riho Terras

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) ensuring interoperability of the transport network, including by migrating to European nominal standard railway gauge;(b) ensuring interoperability of the transport network

Or. en

Justification

The revised TEN-T Regulation (Article 17(3)) foresees a structured assessment process regarding the possible transition of railway networks using gauges different from the European standard of 1435 mm. Member States are required to carry out, by July 2026, an evaluation of existing railway lines on European Transport Corridors, including a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis and an assessment of interoperability impacts. Only on the basis of this assessment may Member States, where appropriate, prepare transition plans identifying which lines could potentially be converted and in which timeframe. Including such requirement in the text pre-empts the national decisions of Member States and creates confusion regarding possible EU financing of such infrastructure in the future.

Amendment 805

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) ensuring interoperability of the transport network, including by migrating to European nominal standard railway gauge;(b) ensuring interoperability of the transport network, including by migrating to European nominal standard railway gauge or ICT systems for transport;

Or. en

Amendment 806

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) preventing or mitigating the adverse impact of foreign ownership of key transport infrastructure located on the priority military mobility corridors;

Or. en

Amendment 807

Petras Auštrevičius, Valérie Devaux, Engin Eroglu, Lucia Yar, Bart Groothuis, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) adapting the infrastructure to abnormal military transport, including by reinforcing bridges for rail and road transport and by reinforcing and enlarging rail, road, port and aerodrome infrastructure;(c) adapting the infrastructure to abnormal military transport, including by reinforcing bridges for rail and road transport and by reinforcing and enlarging rail, road, port and aerodrome infrastructure, and by marking bridges and tunnels with clear indications of load-bearing capacities;

Or. en

Amendment 808

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Reinis Pozņaks

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) adapting the infrastructure to abnormal military transport, including by reinforcing bridges for rail and road transport and by reinforcing and enlarging rail, road, port and aerodrome infrastructure;(c) adapting the infrastructure, where technically and economically feasible and on case-by-case assessments, to abnormal military transport, including by reinforcing bridges for rail and road transport and by reinforcing and enlarging rail, road, port and aerodrome infrastructure;

Or. en

Justification

Adaptation of infrastructure to abnormal military transport should not become a general standard, but must be subject to feasibility and proportionality assessments.

Amendment 809

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) upgrading rail interoperability, including on signalling, electrification, and operational readiness, with rail links to ports, airports and last-mile access to multimodal freight terminals and logistics facilities of strategic relevance for dual-use transport;

Or. en

Amendment 810

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) increasing throughput capacity for all transport modes, including by improving rail and road access to ports and airports and improving port, airport and terminal facilities and equipment;(e) increasing throughput capacity for all transport modes, including by improving rail and road access to ports and airports and improving port, airport and terminal facilities and equipment; particular attention should be given to facilities serving as key logistics and military mobility hubs, especially those located in close proximity to the Union’s eastern border and areas affected by ongoing conflict, such as Jasionka Airport;

Or. en

Justification

In the current geopolitical context, it is essential to strengthen transport infrastructure that supports both civilian and military mobility. Operational readiness depends not only on overall network capacity, but also on key logistics nodes such as ports, airports and multimodal terminals.Particular attention should be given to infrastructure located near the Union’s eastern border and in areas affected by conflict. Facilities such as Jasionka Airport illustrate the importance of such hubs for the efficient transport of equipment, personnel and aid.

Amendment 811

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) increasing throughput capacity for all transport modes, including by improving rail and road access to ports and airports and improving port, airport and terminal facilities and equipment;(e) increasing throughput capacity for all transport modes, including by improving rail and road access to ports and airports and improving port, airport and terminal facilities and equipment using ICT systems for transport as appropriate;

Or. en

Amendment 812

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) developing and upgrading EU and NATO fuel production, storage and distribution networks and enhancing the resilience of such networks, in particular by facilitating the production, storage and supply of sustainable alternative fuels in ports, airports, road, rail and terminal facilities;

Or. en

Amendment 813

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) ensuring transhipment infrastructure with enough capacity in order to enable intermodal military mobility operations;

Or. en

Amendment 814

Alexandr Vondra, Marion Maréchal, Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications; and ensuring their cyber and digital security; this includes mandatory cyber-risk assessments and a minimum security baseline for critical dual-use digital infrastructure, resilient encrypted and redundant secure-communications services with priority routing for military mobility in crises, rapid incident-response and reporting procedures coordinated with national CSIRTs and ENISA, and alignment with NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act and NATO interoperability requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 815

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, and ensuring their cyber and digital security; this includes mandatory cyber-risk assessments and a minimum security baseline for critical dual-use digital infrastructure, resilient encrypted and redundant secure-communications services with priority routing for military mobility in crises, rapid incident-response and reporting procedures coordinated with national CSIRTs and ENISA, and alignment with NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act and NATO interoperability requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 816

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy-supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, and ensuring their cyber and digital security; this includes mandatory cyber-risk assessments and a minimum security baseline for critical dual-use digital infrastructure, resilient encrypted and redundant secure-communications services with priority routing for military mobility in crises, rapid incident-response and reporting procedures coordinated with national CSIRTs and ENISA, and alignment with NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act and NATO interoperability requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 817

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, including access to refueling and charging infrastructure, as well as, where applicable, to alternative fuels, while ensuring their physical and digital security, particularly against cyber threats;

Or. en

Amendment 818

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance, transport and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against cyberattacks and interferences with radio-frequency communications, including through the use of space-based services provided by the Union Space Systems;

Or. en

Amendment 819

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, against conventional and hybrid threats from sea, air and land, as well as against interferences with radio-frequency communications;

Or. en

Amendment 820

Flavio Tosi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, against conventional and hybrid threats from sea, air and land, as well as against interferences with radio-frequency communications;

Or. en

Amendment 821

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications or GNSS spamming and spoofing;

Or. en

Amendment 822

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) enhancing the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and energy supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;(f) enhancing the resilience and cyber defence of communication, control, navigation, surveillance, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications;

Or. en

Justification

Deletion of "energy supply" here as we are proposing a whole new subparagraph on ensuring energy resilience.

Amendment 823

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f a) enhancing the resilience and strategic independence of energy supply infrastructure, including for alternative fuels as well as a robust electricity grid, in order to ensure diversified power sources and adequate reserves along the military mobility corridors that guarantee the uninterrupted functionality of transport capabilities, thereby reducing reliance on external actors that could compromise operational continuity;

Or. en

Amendment 824

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f b) promoting the deployment and use of digital technologies, including for traffic management and data exchange, to ensure the efficient, rapid and adaptable use of resilient and interoperable dual-use infrastructure along military mobility corridors;

Or. en

Amendment 825

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g) ensuring sufficient resilience and redundancy in the network.(g) ensuring sufficient resilience and redundancy in the network, in accordance with criteria to be laid down by the Commission in a forthcoming implementing act.

Or. it

Justification

The concepts of resilience and redundancy need to be clearly defined using measurable criteria in order to avoid uncertainty and inconsistency of implementation.

Amendment 826

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) ensuring the continuity and security of fuel supply for military transport operations, including through the development, upgrade and interconnection of fuel infrastructure such as pipelines, storage facilities and distribution systems, in particular on the Union’s eastern flank, including where relevant with existing NATO fuel infrastructure;

Or. en

Amendment 827

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) Increasing the availability and accessibility of geospatial and road-related data, including data on maximum authorised weights and dimensions of relevant infrastructure, in a machine-readable format through appropriate access points, in order to support the planning and implementation of military mobility corridors.

Or. en

Amendment 828

Borja Giménez Larraz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) Addressing structural bottlenecks in regions where natural barriers severely limit the number of available cross-border passages, by creating or upgrading alternative dual-use routes that increase redundancy and ensure uninterrupted military mobility in case of disruption of the existing limited corridors.

Or. en

Amendment 829

Wouter Beke, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) strengthening resilience against other threats, including those originating from third countries or non-state actors through cyberattacks, sabotage, espionage, drone threats, interception and manipulation of communications, and other hybrid attacks.

Or. en

Amendment 830

Bart Groothuis, Jeannette Baljeu, Petras Auštrevičius, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Benoit Cassart, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Lucia Yar, Valérie Devaux, Asger Christensen, Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) ensuring the availability of adequate fuel storage and supply capacity along the corridor, including for aviation fuels, and identifying and addressing gaps in storage and refining capacity that could hamper military transport operations.

Or. en

Amendment 831

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) identifyng the needs and providing training for transport personnel to operate on dual-use infrastructure. The cost of training for military operations must not be borne by workers;

Or. en

Amendment 832

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) Promoting the uptake of smart and data-driven technologies across the full lifecycle of dual-use infrastructure, including construction, upgrade and maintenance.

Or. en

Amendment 833

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) Promoting the uptake of smart and data-driven technologies across the full lifecycle of dual-use infrastructure, including construction, upgrade and maintenance.

Or. en

Amendment 834

Merja Kyllönen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) (h) identifying the needs for and providing training for transport personnel to operate on dual-use infrastructure.

Or. en

Justification

The dual nature of operations on some transport infrastructure requires dedicated training, particularly as the military share of operations is likely to increase and, by way of priority access, disrupt the civilian share of operations.

Amendment 835

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. For procurements carried out pursuant to points (b) (ba) and (f) of this paragraph which are supported by Union funding, the cost of components of the devices, assets and technologies originating outside the Union shall not be higher than 35 % of the estimated cost of the components of the end product. Such devices, assets and technologies shall be prohibited to use, install or integrate components from high-risk suppliers in the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2026/0011 (COD) (cybersecurity act).

Or. en

Amendment 836

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. Member States shall ensure that projects relating to dual-use infrastructure located along strategic military mobility corridors are subject to effective priority administrative procedures, particularly with regard to authorizations and, where applicable, appeals, in order to reduce implementation times, with clear and binding deadlines.

Or. en

Amendment 837

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 b. Member States shall pay particular attention to rail routes connecting seaports to European corridors, as well as to territorial continuity routes to peripheral regions.

Or. en

Amendment 838

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 1 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 c. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure enhanced coordination of investments in dual-use infrastructure, guaranteeing sufficient and predictable long-term funding.

Or. en

Amendment 839

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński, Roberts Zīle, Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Member States situated along the same military mobility corridor shall cooperate to identify and address potential risks that may affect the functionality, security, or resilience of that corridor, in particular for cross-border transport. To that end, they shall:2. The Member States situated along the same military mobility corridor shall cooperate to identify and address potential risks that may affect the functionality, security, or resilience of that corridor, in particular for cross-border transport, including with close partners at the extremities of the corridors in the Union. To that end, they shall:

Or. en

Amendment 840

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Member States situated along the same military mobility corridor shall cooperate to identify and address potential risks that may affect the functionality, security, or resilience of that corridor, in particular for cross-border transport. To that end, they shall:2. The Member States situated along the same military mobility corridor shall cooperate with the Commission to identify and address potential risks that may affect the functionality, security, or resilience of that corridor, in particular for cross-border transport. To that end, they shall, as soon as possible:

Or. en

Amendment 841

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The Member States situated along the same military mobility corridor shall cooperate to identify and address potential risks that may affect the functionality, security, or resilience of that corridor, in particular for cross-border transport. To that end, they shall:2. The Member States situated along the same military mobility corridor shall cooperate to identify and address potential risks that may affect the functionality, physical or cyber security, or resilience of that corridor, in particular for cross-border transport. To that end, they shall:

Or. en

Amendment 842

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) assess potential infrastructure gaps, missing links and bottlenecks hampering the smooth flow of military transport;(c) assess potential infrastructure gaps, missing links and bottlenecks hampering the smooth flow of military transport, stating, where possible, suitable and relevant operational alternatives;

Or. it

Amendment 843

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) assess potential infrastructure gaps, missing links and bottlenecks hampering the smooth flow of military transport;(c) assess potential infrastructure gaps, missing links and bottlenecks, as well as shortages of trained personnel hampering the smooth flow of military transport;

Or. en

Amendment 844

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) assess potential infrastructure gaps, missing links and bottlenecks hampering the smooth flow of military transport;(c) assess potential infrastructure gaps, missing links, bottlenecks and shortages of trained personnel hampering the smooth flow of military transport;

Or. en

Amendment 845

Borja Giménez Larraz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) Identify areas along the military mobility corridors where the transport network depends on one or two cross-border passages only, and assess the operational risks associated with such limited redundancy, including potential impacts on the capacity to conduct large-scale or time-critical military movements.

Or. en

Amendment 846

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) monitor the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and fuel supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, and assess enforcement measures;(e) monitor the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and fuel supply infrastructure, as well as the electricity electricity grid, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, or cyberattacks and unauthorized access, and assess enforcement measures;

Or. en

Amendment 847

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) monitor the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and fuel supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, and assess enforcement measures;(e) monitor the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance, fuel and energy supply infrastructure, including refueling and alternative fuel infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, and assess enforcement measures;

Or. en

Amendment 848

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) monitor the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and fuel supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, and assess enforcement measures;(e) monitor the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and fuel supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, and assess enforcement measures against conventional and hybrid threats from sea, air and land;

Or. en

Amendment 849

Flavio Tosi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) monitor the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and fuel supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, and assess enforcement measures;(e) monitor the resilience of communication, control, navigation, surveillance and fuel supply infrastructure, in particular against interferences with radio-frequency communications, and assess enforcement measures against conventional and hybrid threats from sea, air and land;

Or. en

Amendment 850

Alexandr Vondra, Marion Maréchal, Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, with a view to appropriately protecting the related transport infrastructure;(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, with a view to appropriately protecting the related transport infrastructure; including cyber, digital and radio-frequency threats, and propose proportionate protection measures for the related transport infrastructure; this shall cover cyber-risk assessments, secure communications and continuity arrangements, C-UAS risks, and mitigation of cyber-physical interdependencies

Or. en

Amendment 851

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, with a view to appropriately protecting the related transport infrastructure;(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, including cyber, digital and radio-frequency threats, and propose proportionate protection measures for the related transport infrastructure; this shall cover cyber-risk assessments, secure communications and continuity arrangements, C-UAS risks, and mitigation of cyber-physical interdependencies;

Or. en

Amendment 852

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, with a view to appropriately protecting the related transport infrastructure;(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, including cyber, digital and radio-frequency threats, and propose proportionate protection measures for the related transport infrastructure; this shall cover cyber-risk assessments, secure communications and continuity arrangements, C-UAS risks, and mitigation of cyber-physical interdependencies;

Or. en

Amendment 853

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, with a view to appropriately protecting the related transport infrastructure;(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, notably the risks linked with third country entities' ownership or control, with a view to appropriately protecting the related transport infrastructure;

Or. en

Amendment 854

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point f

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, with a view to appropriately protecting the related transport infrastructure;(f) assess any other potential risks for military transport operations along the military mobility corridors, including cyber, digital, and radio-frequency threats, and propose proportionate protective measures for the relevant transportation infrastructure.

Or. en

Amendment 855

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(f a) monitor and regularly assess the condition, safety and resilience of transport infrastructure, including through the deployment of sensors and predictive maintenance systems;

Or. en

Amendment 856

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point g

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g) reinforce resilience by ensuring compatibility with the use of the services offered by the Union Space Systems, such as Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT), Earth Observation (EO) and Secure Connectivity. In particular, when using PNT services, they shall use the authentication services offered by the Union Space Programme, or alternatively the Galileo Public Regulated Service (PRS) whenever feasible and without prejudice to Member States prerogatives concerning the use of PRS in their territory. Furthermore, Member States shall utilise the Union space-based EO services, where they offer monitoring and protection solutions.(g) reinforce resilience by ensuring compatibility with the use of the services offered by the Union Space Systems, such as Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT), Earth Observation (EO), Secure Connectivity and Satellite Communications (SATCOM). In particular, when using PNT services, they shall use the authentication services offered by the Union Space Programme, or alternatively the Galileo Public Regulated Service (PRS) whenever feasible and without prejudice to Member States prerogatives concerning the use of PRS in their territory. Furthermore, Member States shall utilise the Union space-based EO services, where they offer monitoring and protection solutions. Member States shall make use of Union connectivity and secure communications capabilities made available under GOVSATCOM and the future Union Secure Connectivity Programme (IRIS2).

Or. en

Amendment 857

Željana Zovko

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(h) assess the readiness and capacity of port infrastructure identified as strategic dual-use infrastructure under Article 33 that serves as an entry or exit point of the military mobility corridor, including its rail and road access connections, load-bearing capacity for military cargo, and availability of secure storage facilities, and report the findings to the Commission and the Military Mobility Transport Group.

Or. en

Justification

Article 32(2) establishes a comprehensive cooperative assessment framework for Member States along the same military mobility corridor, covering infrastructure gaps, interoperability, and resilience. However, the assessment framework focuses exclusively on land-based infrastructure — roads, rail, tunnels, bridges — and does not include port infrastructure serving as the maritime entry or exit point of a corridor. For corridors that terminate at or originate from Adriatic or Baltic port infrastructure, the readiness and capacity of that port infrastructure is as operationally critical as the land-based segments. A port that cannot handle military cargo loads, lacks adequate rail connections, or has insufficient secure storage represents a bottleneck that renders the entire corridor assessment incomplete. This amendment closes that gap by adding port infrastructure to the cooperative assessment framework of Article 32(2), using the SDI definition already established in Article 33 as the qualifying criterion, ensuring that the assessment obligation applies only where port infrastructure has been formally identified as strategically relevant rather than creating a blanket obligation for all ports.

Amendment 858

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) assess and ensure resilience and strategic independence of energy supply infrastructure, including for alternative fuels as well as a robust electricity grid, in order to ensure diversified power sources and reduce reliance on external actors that could compromise operational continuity;

Or. en

Amendment 859

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain, Rosa Serrano Sierra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g a) reinforce functionality and resilience of priority military mobility corridors by increasing geospatial intelligence capabilities and making spatial and infrastructure related data about the maximum weights and dimensions available and accessible to competent authorities.

Or. en

Amendment 860

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Member States shall ensure that, upon activation of EMERS, expedited procedures or operational exemptions are put in place to allow military transport priority access to ports, terminals, logistics hubs, and multimodal interfaces, in order to ensure the smooth flow of operations.

Or. en

Amendment 861

Alexandr Vondra, Marion Maréchal, Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment. Member States shall retain flexibility to determine whether transport infrastructure must be fully adapted to military technical requirements, or when other essential infrastructure priorities—potentially capable of supporting military transport—should take precedence;

Or. en

Amendment 862

Borja Giménez Larraz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. Particular attention shall be given to mountainous regions where topographical constraints generate structural bottlenecks and where enhancing dual-use cross-border capacity would significantly increase the resilience of the entire corridor. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.

Or. en

Amendment 863

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’), making it clear that such investments may require medium- and long-term implementation timetables and are backed up by sufficient EU funding. This investment shall be made by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.

Or. it

Justification

Setting up so-called 'hotspots' generally requires considerable time and financial resources. The amount of EU funding currently earmarked to them is insufficient to meet the estimated investment needs.

Amendment 864

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned are invited to such meetings, and military experts as well as operators of strategic infrastructure are be consulted in the assessment.

Or. en

Amendment 865

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Marion Maréchal, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with and with the agreement of the Member States concerned, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.

Or. en

Amendment 866

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.3. Based on the analysis conducted in accordance with paragraph 2, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, shall identify targeted short-term investments (transport infrastructure ‘hotspots’) that are to be implemented by Member States as a matter of priority along the military mobility corridors and where possible by 2030. To that end, the Commission shall set up targeted meetings per military mobility corridor in order to agree on the implementation of such hotspots in a synchronised and coordinated manner. The Member States concerned shall be invited to such meetings, and military experts shall be consulted in the assessment.

Or. en

Amendment 867

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain, Rosa Serrano Sierra

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. By (2 years after entry into force of this Regulation), Member States shall ensure that relevant infrastructure on dual-use transport networks, including bridges and tunnels, is marked with indications of the maximum weights and dimensions of military transport convoys that such infrastructure can accomodate. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt implementing acts laying down common technical specifications for such markings.

Or. en

Amendment 868

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors;(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, where relevant, with the help of spatial data and spatial data services, as defined in Directive 2007/2/EC, and road, traffic and travel data as defined in Directive 2023/2661, and making best use of the military mobility corridors;

Or. en

Amendment 869

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors;(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors supported by spatial data and spatial data services, as defined in Directive 2007/2/EC, and road, traffic and travel data as defined in Directive 2023/2661.

Or. en

Amendment 870

Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Valérie Devaux, Engin Eroglu, Lucia Yar, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors;(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors supported by spatial data and spatial data services, as defined in Directive 2007/2/EC, and road, traffic and travel data as defined in Directive 2023/2661;

Or. en

Amendment 871

Borja Giménez Larraz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors;(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities, with particular emphasis on regions where the transport network relies on a very limited number of viable cross-border passages, to ensure continuity of operations through the development of alternative or complementary routes;

Or. en

Amendment 872

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors;(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes using ICT systems for transport as appropriate and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors;

Or. en

Amendment 873

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors;(a) agreeing on designated routes, transport nodes and supporting facilities like military transport or dual-use support centres, and making best use of the military mobility corridors;

Or. en

Amendment 874

Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Vangelis Meimarakis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) fostering coordination and cooperation between rail infrastructure managers in different Member States, in particular to ensure the efficient processing of the traffic arrangements pursuant to Article 7 and rapid and efficient route compatibility checks for abnormal military transport crossing more than one network;(b) fostering coordination and cooperation between infrastructure owners, managers and operators in different Member States, in particular to ensure the efficient processing of the traffic arrangements pursuant to Articles 5,6,7,8,10,11 and rapid and efficient route compatibility checks for abnormal military transport crossing more than one network;

Or. en

Amendment 875

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) fostering coordination and cooperation between national aviation authorities with the support of the EDA and, where relevant, the Network Manager defined in Article 2, point (49), of Regulation (EU) 2024/2803, in order to define cross-border connectivity points between all Member States, in accordance with the principles laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/200537 .(c) fostering coordination and cooperation between national aviation authorities with the support of the EDA, the impacted air navigation service providers and, where relevant, the Network Manager defined in Article 2, point (49), of Regulation (EU) 2024/2803, in order to define cross-border connectivity points between all Member States, in accordance with the principles laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/200537 .
37 (38)Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down common rules for the flexible use of airspace (OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 20, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/2150/oj).37 (38)Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down common rules for the flexible use of airspace (OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 20, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/2150/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 876

Petras Auštrevičius, Valérie Devaux, Engin Eroglu, Lucia Yar, Bart Groothuis, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) fostering coordination and cooperation between national aviation authorities with the support of the EDA and, where relevant, the Network Manager defined in Article 2, point (49), of Regulation (EU) 2024/2803, in order to define cross-border connectivity points between all Member States, in accordance with the principles laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/200537 .(c) fostering coordination and cooperation between national aviation authorities with the support of the EDA, concerned air navigation service providers and, where relevant, the Network Manager defined in Article 2, point (49), of Regulation (EU) 2024/2803, in order to define cross-border connectivity points between all Member States, in accordance with the principles laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/200537 .
37 (38)Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down common rules for the flexible use of airspace (OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 20, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/2150/oj).37 (38)Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down common rules for the flexible use of airspace (OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 20, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/2150/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 877

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) fostering coordination and cooperation between national aviation authorities with the support of the EDA and, where relevant, the Network Manager defined in Article 2, point (49), of Regulation (EU) 2024/2803, in order to define cross-border connectivity points between all Member States, in accordance with the principles laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/200537 .(c) fostering coordination and cooperation between national aviation authorities with the support of the EDA, the affected air navigation service providers and, where relevant, the Network Manager defined in Article 2, point (49), of Regulation (EU) 2024/2803, in order to define cross-border connectivity points between all Member States, in accordance with the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 2150/200537.
37 (38)Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down common rules for the flexible use of airspace (OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 20, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/2150/oj).37 (38)Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down common rules for the flexible use of airspace (OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 20, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/2150/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 878

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) an assessment of the deployment of military counter-mobility assets and infrastructure, particularly at points identified as vulnerable along the Union’s eastern flank.

Or. en

Amendment 879

Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. In implementing this Article, Member States shall be supported by financial assistance under the CEF military mobility envelope. To this end, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act defining the infrastructure requirements applicable to specific categories of infrastructure and assets serving both civilian and defence needs. This should include an amendment to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1328, with a view to broadening its current scope to also cover products and assets that support strategic dual-use infrastructure.

Or. en

Amendment 880

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 32 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. In the evaluation performed under this article, connections with dual-use infrastructure should be strengthened considering systemic integration with TEN-T projects and dual-use logistics corridors to improve sustainability and interoperability.

Or. en

Amendment 881

Mircea-Gheorghe Hava

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Wihtout prejudice to Directive (EU) 2022/2557 an in complementarity with it, Member States shall identify the following infrastructure located in their territories as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:1. Without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2022/2557 and in complementarity with it, Member States shall identify strategic dual-use infrastructure including, where relevant, maritime ports, river ports, airports, rail-road terminals, gauge-changing facilities, bridges, tunnels, fuel depots, pipelines, maintenance and repair hubs, and border crossing infrastructure, especially when such infrastructure is located on military mobility corridors, on the eastern flank of the Union or in the Black Sea and Danube region, or when it connects the Union with Ukraine or the Republic of Moldova, for the purposes of this Regulation:

Or. ro

Amendment 882

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Wihtout prejudice to Directive (EU) 2022/2557 an in complementarity with it, Member States shall identify the following infrastructure located in their territories as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:1. Wihtout prejudice to Directive (EU) 2022/2557 an in complementarity with it, while taking into account the specificities of military mobility requirements, Member States shall identify the following infrastructure located in their territories as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation, in line with the priorities set out in the corridors of the Trans-European Transport Network :

Or. en

Amendment 883

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Wihtout prejudice to Directive (EU) 2022/2557 an in complementarity with it, Member States shall identify the following infrastructure located in their territories as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:1. Wihtout prejudice to Directive (EU) 2022/2557 an in complementarity with it, Member States, with the guidance of the Commission where appropriate, shall identify the following infrastructure located in their territories as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:

Or. en

Amendment 884

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) key transport infrastructure serving the capital city of each Member State, including, if applicable, the biggest maritime and inland waterway ports as well as the biggest airport and multimodal freight terminal, based on highest traffic volumes or throughput capacity, or both;(a) key transport infrastructure serving the capital city of each Member State, including, if applicable, the biggest maritime and inland waterway ports as well as either the largest airport or the airport located closest to areas affected by conflict, serving as logistics and military hubs, and multimodal freight terminal, based on highest traffic volumes or throughput capacity, or both;

Or. en

Justification

In the current security context, infrastructure selection based solely on traffic volumes does not fully reflect operational needs related to military mobility. It is essential to also consider the strategic location of infrastructure, in particular proximity to areas affected by conflict. Allowing the inclusion of airports located closest to such areas ensures that key logistics and military hubs are adequately recognised.

Amendment 885

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) key transport infrastructure serving the capital city of each Member State, including, if applicable, the biggest maritime and inland waterway ports as well as the biggest airport and multimodal freight terminal, based on highest traffic volumes or throughput capacity, or both;(a) key transport infrastructure serving the capital city of each Member State, including, if applicable, the biggest maritime and inland waterway ports as well as the biggest airport and multimodal freight terminal including air navigation services, infrastructure and systems related to them, based on highest traffic volumes or throughput capacity, or both;

Or. en

Amendment 886

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) key transport infrastructure serving the capital city of each Member State, including, if applicable, the biggest maritime and inland waterway ports as well as the biggest airport and multimodal freight terminal, based on highest traffic volumes or throughput capacity, or both;(a) key transport infrastructure serving the capital city of each Member State, including, if applicable, the biggest maritime and inland waterway ports as well as the biggest airport and multimodal freight terminal including air navigation services, infrastructure and systems thereof, based on highest traffic volumes or throughput capacity, or both;

Or. en

Amendment 887

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) for each NUTS 2 region along the military mobility corridors, the biggest maritime and inland waterway port as well as the biggest airport and multimodal freight terminal, based on highest traffic volumes or throughput capacity, or both.(c) for each NUTS 2 region along the military mobility corridors, the biggest maritime and inland waterway port as well as the biggest airport and multimodal freight terminal, based on highest traffic volumes or throughput capacity, or both, and, where applicable, the associated refueling and recharging infrastructure serving these hubs.

Or. en

Amendment 888

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
These infrastructure projects are considered a priority under the Union’s funding programs for dual-use transport infrastructure, in particular the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF).

Or. en

Amendment 889

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. The identification of strategic dual-use infrastructure under this Regulation follows a specific approach, complementary to the mechanisms provided for in Directive (EU) 2022/2557, in order to meet the specific requirements of military mobility operations, notably in terms of speed, flexibility and operational priorities.

Or. en

Amendment 890

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. For the purpose of identifying infrastructures according to points (a) to (c) of paragraph 1, neighboring Member States shall coordinate to jointly identify cross-border infrastructures.

Or. en

Amendment 891

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall identify transport infrastructure meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:2. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, on the basis of an assessment of operational needs for military mobility, Member States shall identify transport infrastructure meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:

Or. en

Amendment 892

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall identify transport infrastructure meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:2. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States, with the guidance of the Commission where appropriate, shall identify transport infrastructure meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:

Or. en

Amendment 893

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) infrastructure that has a strategic capacity to support large-scale military transport operations;(a) infrastructure that has a strategic capacity to support large-scale military transport operations including, regarding rail, trackside control-command and signalling, on-board control-command and signalling, operation and traffic management, maintenance as defined by Annex II of Interoperability Directive (EU)2016/797 ;

Or. en

Amendment 894

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) infrastructure that has a strategic capacity to support large-scale military transport operations;(a) infrastructure that has a strategic capacity to support large-scale military transport operations including, regarding rail, trackside control-command and signalling, on-board control-command and signalling, operation and traffic management, maintenance as defined by Annex II of Interoperability Directive (EU)2016/797;

Or. en

Amendment 895

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) infrastructure that has a strategic capacity to support large-scale military transport operations;(a) infrastructure that has a strategic capacity to support large-scale military transport operations, including facilities that serve as transit point or strategic logistical hubs;

Or. en

Amendment 896

Bart Groothuis, Jeannette Baljeu, Petras Auštrevičius, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Benoit Cassart, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Lucia Yar, Valérie Devaux, Nathalie Loiseau, Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) infrastructure that has a strategic capacity to support large-scale military transport operations;(a) infrastructure that has a strategic capacity to support large-scale military transport operations, including through multimodal and inland waterway transport;

Or. en

Amendment 897

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) infrastructure that is strategically important for military transport along one or several military mobility corridors;(b) infrastructure that is strategically important for military transport along one or several military mobility corridors, including trackside control-command and signaling, on board control-command and signaling, trafic management and communication technologies;

Or. en

Amendment 898

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) infrastructure that is strategically important for military transport along one or several military mobility corridors;(b) infrastructure that is strategically important for military transport along one or several military mobility corridors in particular in regions facing increased security and operational pressure, including those located on the Union’s eastern flank;

Or. en

Amendment 899

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) infrastructure that poses a known bottleneck or missing link for military transport operations, such as a strategic river crossing or tunnel.(d) infrastructure that poses a known bottleneck or missing link for military transport operations, such as a strategic river crossing, tunnel or fuel supply and storage infrastructure necessary to ensure the continuity of operations.

Or. en

Amendment 900

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) dual-use mobile assets, including vehicles and vessels, critical to ensure connectivity between fixed physical infrastructure and key nodes, in particular ports and inland transport hubs.

Or. en

Amendment 901

Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) infrastructure equipped with trackside control-command and signalling subsystems of the Union rail system as defined by Annex II of Interoperability Directive (EU) 2016/797.

Or. en

Amendment 902

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) infrastructure that is partially owned or controlled by third country entities that contravene the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States.

Or. en

Amendment 903

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) infrastructure that can serve as an alternative or diversion route in the event of the unavailability or disruption of infrastructure referred to in paragraph (1).

Or. en

Amendment 904

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) infrastructure that can serve as an alternative or diversion route in the event of the unavailability or disruption of infrastructure referred to in paragraph (1).

Or. en

Amendment 905

Dariusz Joński, Sophia Kircher, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify key products that support such infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation. In the rail sector, this shall include, in particular, communication and signalling technologies, traffic management systems, and predictive maintenance solutions.

Or. en

Amendment 906

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify essential supporting infrastructure, amongst which transport-critical energy and communications infrastructure, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify essential supporting (digital) infrastructure, amongst which transport-critical energy and communications infrastructure, including refueling and alternative charging infrastructure that provides access to alternative fuels, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation, taking into account national security and defence priorities:

Or. en

Amendment 907

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify essential supporting infrastructure, amongst which transport-critical energy and communications infrastructure, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States, with the guidance of the Commission where appropriate, shall also identify essential supporting infrastructure, amongst which transport-critical energy and communications infrastructure, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:

Or. en

Amendment 908

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify essential supporting infrastructure, amongst which transport-critical energy and communications infrastructure, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify essential supporting infrastructure, amongst which ICT systems for transport, transport-critical energy and communications infrastructure, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:

Or. en

Amendment 909

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify essential supporting infrastructure, amongst which transport-critical energy and communications infrastructure, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify essential supporting infrastructure, amongst which transport-critical energy, communications and space infrastructure, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:

Or. en

Amendment 910

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify essential supporting infrastructure, amongst which transport-critical energy and communications infrastructure, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:3. In addition to the strategic dual-use infrastructure referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also identify essential supporting infrastructure, amongst which transport-critical energy, fuel and communications infrastructure, meeting the following criteria as strategic dual-use infrastructure for the purposes of this Regulation:

Or. en

Amendment 911

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) infrastructure that has a strategic capacity to support large-scale military transport operations;(a) infrastructure that has a strategic and logistical capacity to support large-scale military transport operations;

Or. en

Amendment 912

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point e

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) infrastructure that plays a strategic role in storing dual-use assets that facilitate military transport along the military mobility corridors.(e) infrastructure that plays a strategic role in storing dual-use assets that facilitate military transport along the military mobility corridors, including fuel storage and distribution infrastructure in particular in regions where such infrastructure is insufficient.

Or. en

Amendment 913

Borja Giménez Larraz

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) Infrastructure in areas where the absence of alternative cross-border routes generates operational vulnerabilities for rapid military transport, and where improved dual-use capacity would significantly strengthen the resilience of the relevant military mobility corridor.

Or. en

Amendment 914

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) infrastructure that plays a strategic role for the storage, supply or distribution of energy required to support military transport operations, including refuelling and recharging capacities.

Or. en

Amendment 915

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) infrastructure that plays a strategic role for the storage, supply or distribution of energy required to support military transport operations, including refuelling and recharging capacities.

Or. en

Amendment 916

Bart Groothuis, Jeannette Baljeu, Petras Auštrevičius, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Benoit Cassart, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Lucia Yar, Valérie Devaux, Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) infrastructure that ensures operational continuity in the event of a cyberattack or other system failures, for example by providing backup systems or decentralized control systems;

Or. en

Amendment 917

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) Refining and alternative fuel manufacturing infrastructure, instrumental to guarantee adequate fuel supply to military troops.

Or. en

Amendment 918

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e a) alternative fuels supply infrastructure;

Or. en

Amendment 919

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e b) infrastructure that provides critical cybersecurity, digital support, and communications capabilities essential for the operational effectiveness of military forces.

Or. en

Amendment 920

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e b) infrastructure that provides critical cybersecurity, digital support, and communications capabilities essential for the operational effectiveness of military forces.

Or. en

Amendment 921

Alexandr Vondra, Marion Maréchal, Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. Member states shall ensure that the development, upgrading and maintenance of strategic dual-use infrastructure is not subject to undue delays, including through accelerated and simplified permitting procedures where appropriate.

Or. en

Amendment 922

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article, with the mandatory involvement of infrastructure operators and other relevant stakeholders, who may provide input based on their technical expertise and experience, subject, where necessary, to confidentiality agreements. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.

Or. it

Justification

Infrastructure managers and operators possess the requisite technical knowledge and operational experience for the effective and realistic identification of strategic dual-use infrastructure.

Amendment 923

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article, which may include information and pertinent indicators regarding the criticality and default resilience levels for each item. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.

Or. en

Amendment 924

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The list should include criticality levels for SDIs as well as harmonized standard with minimum resilience indicators. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.

Or. en

Amendment 925

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.4. As soon as possible, but not lather than [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments, without prejudice to their responsibility for national security and defence, and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.

Or. en

Amendment 926

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.4. By [1 year after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure ranked according to its criticality located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.

Or. en

Amendment 927

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.4. By [1 year after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure ranked according to its criticality located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.

Or. en

Amendment 928

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.4. By [1 year after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.

Or. en

Amendment 929

Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.4. By [1 year after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.

Or. en

Amendment 930

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. By [2 years after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.4. By [1 year after entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall draw up a list of the strategic dual-use infrastructure located in its territory and identified in accordance with this Article. They shall submit that list to the Commission for possible comments and review it accordingly. The Member States shall update that list on a regular basis according to the same procedure. The list shall be treated as “Sensitive/Limité”.

Or. en

Amendment 931

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Member States shall ensure that strategic dual-use infrastructure identified in accordance with this Article is, where appropriate, clearly marked and accompanied by adequate information regarding its technical characteristics relevant to military transport, in particular with regard to load-bearing capacities.

Or. en

Amendment 932

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Member States shall ensure that strategic dual-use road infrastructure along military mobility corridors, such as bridges and tunnels, are clearly marked with indications of their load-bearing capacities.
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications for such markings.

Or. en

Amendment 933

Kosma Złotowski, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Member States shall ensure that strategic dual-use road infrastructure along military mobility corridors, including bridges and tunnels, is marked with clear indications of load-bearing capacities. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications for such markings.

Or. en

Amendment 934

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
In the implementation of paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall be assisted by the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679.In the implementation of paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall be assisted by the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and, for matters related to aviation, by the Committee established in accordance with Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2024/2803.

Or. en

Amendment 935

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
In the implementation of paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall be assisted by the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679.In the implementation of paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall be assisted by the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and for aviation-related matters, by the Committee established in accordance with Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2024/2803.

Or. en

Amendment 936

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
In the implementation of paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall be assisted by the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679.In the implementation of paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission, in close coordination with Member States, shall be assisted by the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679.

Or. en

Amendment 937

Marta Wcisło

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. Member States and the Commission shall ensure that the development and upgrading of dual-use transport infrastructure is prioritised with particular focus on:
(a) the removal of bottlenecks and reinforcement of critical infrastructure, including bridges, tunnels and key network nodes;
(b) the increase of capacity of ports, inland waterways, airports and intermodal terminals supporting military mobility; (c) the promotion of technical interoperability, including, where relevant, the progressive alignment with European rail standards;
(d) the strengthening of resilience of communication, navigation and energy supply systems essential for transport operations;
(e) enhanced coordination between Member States sharing the same corridors, in particular with regard to cross-border risks and operational continuity.
Particular attention shall be given to projects located in eastern border regions of the Union, taking into account their strategic role for military mobility and increased operational burden.

Or. en

Amendment 938

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. The achievement of the objectives of this Regulation requires substantial and immediate Union level financial support. In light of the estimated investment needs of approximately EUR 100 billion for priority infrastructure interventions (hotspots), the Commission shall assess additional funding solutions beyond the allocations currently foreseen under the CEF 2028–2034 military mobility envelope. Such solutions shall include dedicated instruments for interoperable dual-use rolling stock, the upgrading and authorisation of such rolling stock, and the modernisation of adequately equipped freight terminals, in order to ensure priority military transport without disrupting civilian traffic flows.

Or. en

Justification

The Regulation’s resilience and corridor objectives require significant investment in infrastructure, rolling stock and terminals. Making the Union-level financing dimension explicit increases credibility and implementation feasibility, avoids unfunded obligations for infrastructure managers, and supports dual-use upgrades while safeguarding civilian traffic continuity.

Amendment 939

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. Infrastructures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be marked with marked with clear indications of dimensions and load-bearing capacities. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications for such markings.

Or. en

Amendment 940

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 33 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5 a. Infrastructures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be marked with clear indications of dimensions and load-bearing capacities. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications for such markings.

Or. en

Amendment 941

Stanislav Stoyanov, Volker Schnurrbusch, Milan Mazurek, Siegbert Frank Droese

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Member States shall take the following basic protection measures in relation to SDI located in their territories to protect them against all hazards, to enhance their resilience and to ensure their effective operation at all times:1. Member States shall take the following basic protection measures in relation to SDI without undue delay located in their territories to protect them against all hazards, to enhance their resilience and to ensure their effective operation at all times:

Or. en

Amendment 942

Bart Groothuis, Jeannette Baljeu, Petras Auštrevičius, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Benoit Cassart, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Lucia Yar, Valérie Devaux, Asger Christensen, Engin Eroglu

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452;(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening mechanisms in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452 this includes risks arising where ownership or control of terminals or operational facilities confers effective access to or influence over connected systems, including port community systems, digital logistics platforms, and remotely updatable or automated operational technology;

Or. en

Amendment 943

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452;(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452, and ensure that there is no dependency on high-risk suppliers in the meaning of Regulation (EU) 202X/XXX [Cybersecurity Act];

Or. en

Amendment 944

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452;(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, in particular by ensuring and promoting European ownership and control of these, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452;

Or. en

Amendment 945

Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452;(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI;

Or. en

Amendment 946

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452;(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452, and promote European ownership and effective control of SDI;

Or. en

Amendment 947

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452;(b) prevent, mitigate and address the risks associated with foreign ownership or control of SDI, including through the foreign investment screening in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452 and following non-exhaustive mitigating measures;

Or. en

Amendment 948

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
i) the establishment of an additional code of conduct in the context of the provision or exchange of sensitive information, with a view to safeguarding public order, national security and strategic interests;

Or. en

Amendment 949

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
ii) the designation of one or more contact persons or compliance officers holding a security clearance, responsible for the handling of sensitive information or data;

Or. en

Amendment 950

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
iii) the requirement for one or more members of owners, operators and managers to obtain a security clearance;

Or. en

Amendment 951

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iv (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
iv) the establishment within the undertaking of a liaison officer or a security committee empowered to regulate access to, or the transfer of, information and to report any breaches to the competent authorities;

Or. en

Amendment 952

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b – point v (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
v) the consolidation and allocation of certain critical processes or services within a separate subsidiary;

Or. en

Amendment 953

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b – point vi (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
vi) the requirement to provide guarantees ensuring the continuity of certain processes and/or the supply of services and goods affecting national security, public order and strategic interests;

Or. en

Amendment 954

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b – point vii (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
vii) the establishment of security protocols for, and/or the obligation to notify the authorities of, visits by non-EU residents in sensitive sectors;

Or. en

Amendment 955

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b – point viii (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
viii) the imposition of periodic reporting on security aspects relating to critical processes;

Or. en

Amendment 956

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ix (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
ix) the imposition of periodic on-site inspections in order to verify compliance with the mitigating measures.

Or. en

Amendment 957

Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(b a) limit foreign ownership of strategic dual-use infrastructure to a maximum of 25% of the total capacity, and the operational control of such infrastructure is not excercised by foreign actors;

Or. en

Amendment 958

Petras Auštrevičius, Valérie Devaux, Engin Eroglu, Lucia Yar, Bart Groothuis, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, such as railway signalling and traffic management systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers, air traffic controllers and pilots;
39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 959

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, signaling and control-command systems, chips, IT systems, navigation and communcation tools, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;
39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 960

Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;(c) ensure and enforce strict control over risks linked to the management, ownership or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, login systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;
39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 961

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;(c) ensure and enforce strict control over risks linked to the management, ownership or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, login systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;
39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 962

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers, air traffic controllers and pilots;
39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 963

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39, seafarers, air traffic controllers and pilots;
39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 964

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, fuel infrastructure as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;
39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 965

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;(c) prevent, mitigate and address the risks linked to the management or operation of specific assets that are part of or related to an SDI such as specific lifting equipment, IT systems, security control and detection equipment, fuel infrastructure as well as critical personnel and operations, such as rail freight providers, logistics companies, providers of port services as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , seafarers and pilots;
39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).39 (39)Regulation (EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017 establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports (OJ L 57, 3.3.2017, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/352/oj).

Or. en

Amendment 966

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) where appropriate, take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.(d) take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other conventional and hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with integrated systems for monitoring, detection and deterrence of conventional and hybrid threats from sea, underwater, air and land, as well electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.

Or. en

Amendment 967

Flavio Tosi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) where appropriate, take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.(d) take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other conventional and hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with integrated systems for monitoring, detection and deterrence of conventional and hybrid threats from sea, underwater, air and land, as well electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.

Or. en

Amendment 968

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) where appropriate, take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.(d) take all necessary measures to protect the entire system of SDI:s in the Member State against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with defence capabilities, including cyber defence systems, electronic warfare interference capacity, and anti-drone systems to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.

Or. en

Amendment 969

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) where appropriate, take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.(d) where appropriate, take measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist threats, cyberattacks, UAV/drone attacks, and other hybrid threats, and equip the SDI with the capacity to detect, deter, and counter such threats, including electronic warfare, kinetic, and procedural measures, as well as jamming and spoofing to mitigate air raids and drone incursions.

Or. en

Amendment 970

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) where appropriate, take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.(d) take robust measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, as well as risks stemming from economic dependencies, espionage and sabotage, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.

Or. en

Amendment 971

Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) where appropriate, take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.(d) take robust measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, as well as risks stemming from economic dependencies, espionage and sabotage, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.

Or. en

Amendment 972

Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Valérie Devaux, Engin Eroglu, Lucia Yar, Bart Groothuis, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) where appropriate, take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing.(d) where appropriate, take basic measures to protect the SDI against interferences and attacks by State and non-State actors, including terrorist attacks, cybersecurity and other hybrid attacks, and equip the SDI with electronic warfare interference capacity to counter air raids and drone attacks, including jamming and spoofing, and to ensure uninterrupted air navigation services.

Or. en

Amendment 973

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
For procurements carried out with the aim of implementing the requirements referred to in paragraphs (b) to (d), Member States shall ensure that :
- the costs of components of all devices, assets and technologies, used to ensure basic protection of the SDI, originating outside the Union are not higher than 35 % of the estimated cost of the components of the end product, and that
- all devices, assets and technologies, used to ensure basic protection of the SDI are prohibited to use, install or integrate components from on high-risk suppliers in the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2026/0011 (COD) (cybersecurity act).

Or. en

Amendment 974

Alexandr Vondra, Marion Maréchal, Michał Dworczyk, Elena Donazzan, Alberico Gambino

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) develop and deploy Counter-UAS capabilities to protect the SDI, logistics hubs and mobility corridors. C-UAS systems shall comply with Union safety, data protection and interoperability requirements and be integrated into national airspace management and EMERS procedures.

Or. en

Amendment 975

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) develop and deploy Counter-UAS capabilities to protect the SDI, logistics hubs and mobility corridors. C-UAS systems shall comply with Union safety, data protection and interoperability requirements and be integrated into national airspace management and EMERS procedures.

Or. en

Amendment 976

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) Ensure that there is no dependency on high-risk suppliers.

Or. en

Amendment 977

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) Ensure that there is no dependency on high-risk suppliers.

Or. en

Amendment 978

Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The owners, operators and managers of SDI shall take all necessary technical, security and organisational measures within their area of responsibility and, where relevant, in collaboration with each other, to ensure that the SDI is appropriately protected against all hazards, that its resilience is enhanced and that its effective operation at all times is guaranteed. In particular, the owners, operators and managers of SDI shall:2. The owners, operators and managers of SDI shall take all necessary technical, security and organisational measures within their area of responsibility and, where relevant, in collaboration with each other, to ensure that the SDI is appropriately protected against all hazards, that its resilience is enhanced and that its effective operation at all times is guaranteed. Member States shall ensure effective supervision of these obligations and shall submit regular reports to the Commission.

Or. en

Amendment 979

Dariusz Joński, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. The owners, operators and managers of SDI shall take all necessary technical, security and organisational measures within their area of responsibility and, where relevant, in collaboration with each other, to ensure that the SDI is appropriately protected against all hazards, that its resilience is enhanced and that its effective operation at all times is guaranteed. In particular, the owners, operators and managers of SDI shall:2. The owners, operators and managers of SDI shall take all necessary technical, security and organisational measures within their area of responsibility and, where relevant, in collaboration with each other, to ensure that the SDI is appropriately protected against all hazards, that its resilience is enhanced and that its effective operation at all times is guaranteed taking into account the evolving nature of threats. In particular, the owners, operators and managers of SDI shall:

Or. en

Amendment 980

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) implement the relevant basic protection and resilience measures for SDI;(a) implement the relevant basic protection and resilience measures for SDI, including from a cyber security perspective and in terms of secure communication services;

Or. en

Amendment 981

Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) implement the relevant basic protection and resilience measures for SDI;(a) implement the relevant all necessary protection and resilience measures for SDI;

Or. en

Amendment 982

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c a) ensure the adequate maintenance of the concerned infrastructure for its sustained proper functionning, including for military mobility requirements, particularly in line with aritcle 49 of regulation (EU) 2024/1679 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network;

Or. en

Amendment 983

Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 2 – point d

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d) provide detailed information on the ownership structure of the SDI at the first request of the Member State where the SDI is located.(d) provide detailed information on the ownership structure of the SDI to the Member State where the SDI is located.

Or. en

Amendment 984

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) shall carry out a cyber risk assessment at least annually and implement a minimum-security baseline covering patch management, network segmentation, secure remote access, protection of industrial control systems and secure communications.

Or. en

Amendment 985

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(d a) shall carry out a cyber risk assessment at least annually and implement a minimum-security baseline covering patch management, network segmentation, secure remote access, protection of industrial control systems and secure communications.

Or. en

Amendment 986

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2a. Implementation of the aforementioned measures necessitates coordination between Member States, the relevant authorities and the owners, operators and managers of strategic dual-use infrastructure with a view to laying down minimum security requirements and procedures for verification and monitoring, as well as criteria for identifying and prioritising the protective measures to be adopted.

Or. it

Amendment 987

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Marion Maréchal, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Member States shall, without undue delay, inform the Commission and the Member States situated along the same military mobility corridors of any incidents in relation to SDI located on their territory that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt the provision of essential services, within the meaning of Article 15, paragraph 1 of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, and that were either notified to them by the owners, operators and managers of SDI or that they became aware of through any other means. Such notifications shall include any available information to enable the competent authority to assess the nature, cause and possible consequences of the incident, including any available information to determine the resulting capacity restrictions and possible cross-border impact of the incident.3. Member States shall, without undue delay, inform the Member States situated along the same military mobility corridors of any incidents in relation to SDI located on their territory that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt the provision of essential services, within the meaning of Article 15, paragraph 1 of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, and that were either notified to them by the owners, operators and managers of SDI or that they became aware of through any other means. Such information shall be exchanged through the competent authorities, including the National Coordinators for Cross-Border Military Transport. Where appropriate, Member States may transmit aggregated or non-operational information to the Commission. Such notifications shall include any available information to enable the competent authority to assess the nature, cause and possible consequences of the incident, including any available information to determine the resulting capacity restrictions and possible cross-border impact of the incident.

Or. en

Amendment 988

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Member States shall, without undue delay, inform the Commission and the Member States situated along the same military mobility corridors of any incidents in relation to SDI located on their territory that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt the provision of essential services, within the meaning of Article 15, paragraph 1 of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, and that were either notified to them by the owners, operators and managers of SDI or that they became aware of through any other means. Such notifications shall include any available information to enable the competent authority to assess the nature, cause and possible consequences of the incident, including any available information to determine the resulting capacity restrictions and possible cross-border impact of the incident.3. Member States shall, without undue delay, using the appropriate form (to be defined in annex) through the Military Mobility Digital Information System, inform the Commission and the Member States situated along the same military mobility corridors of any incidents in relation to SDI located on their territory that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt the provision of essential services, within the meaning of Article 15, paragraph 1 of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, and that were either notified to them by the owners, operators and managers of SDI or that they became aware of through any other means. Such notifications shall include any available information to enable the competent authority to assess the nature, cause and possible consequences of the incident, including any available information to determine the resulting capacity restrictions and possible cross-border impact of the incident.

Or. en

Amendment 989

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. Member States shall, without undue delay, inform the Commission and the Member States situated along the same military mobility corridors of any incidents in relation to SDI located on their territory that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt the provision of essential services, within the meaning of Article 15, paragraph 1 of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, and that were either notified to them by the owners, operators and managers of SDI or that they became aware of through any other means. Such notifications shall include any available information to enable the competent authority to assess the nature, cause and possible consequences of the incident, including any available information to determine the resulting capacity restrictions and possible cross-border impact of the incident.3. Member States shall, without undue delay, inform the Commission and the Member States situated along the same military mobility corridors using the System referred to in article 14 of this Regulation, of any incidents in relation to SDI located on their territory that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt the provision of essential services, within the meaning of Article 15, paragraph 1 of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, and that were either notified to them by the owners, operators and managers of SDI or that they became aware of through any other means. Such notifications shall include any available information to enable the competent authority to assess the nature, cause and possible consequences of the incident, including any available information to determine the resulting capacity restrictions and possible cross-border impact of the incident.

Or. en

Amendment 990

Willemien Koning

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission may adopt implementing acts to identify the basic protection and resilience measures for SDI, as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, and to identify the enhanced protection measures for SDI referred to in Article 24 of this Regulation. To this end, the Commission shall in particular take account of the Commission guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 and may also seek the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(4) of this Regulation. The Commission may propose to include the measures covered in that implementing act in the Council Military Requirements.4. The Commission may adopt implementing acts to identify the basic protection and resilience measures for SDI, as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, and to identify the enhanced protection measures for SDI referred to in Article 24 of this Regulation, ensuring the safeguarding of multimodality and the resilience and functioning of multimodal terminals. To this end, the Commission shall in particular take account of the Commission guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 and may also seek the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(4) of this Regulation. The Commission may propose to include the measures covered in that implementing act in the Council Military Requirements. The Commission will monitor the adequate implementation of this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 991

Wouter Beke, Willemien Koning, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission may adopt implementing acts to identify the basic protection and resilience measures for SDI, as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, and to identify the enhanced protection measures for SDI referred to in Article 24 of this Regulation. To this end, the Commission shall in particular take account of the Commission guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 and may also seek the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(4) of this Regulation. The Commission may propose to include the measures covered in that implementing act in the Council Military Requirements.4. The Commission may adopt implementing acts to identify the basic protection and resilience measures for SDI, as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, and to identify the enhanced protection measures for SDI referred to in Article 24 of this Regulation, ensuring the safeguarding of multimodality and the resilience and functioning of multimodal terminals. To this end, the Commission shall in particular take account of the Commission guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 and may also seek the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(4) of this Regulation. The Commission may propose to include the measures covered in that implementing act in the Council Military Requirements. The Commission will monitor the adequate implementation of this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 992

Salvatore De Meo

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission may adopt implementing acts to identify the basic protection and resilience measures for SDI, as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, and to identify the enhanced protection measures for SDI referred to in Article 24 of this Regulation. To this end, the Commission shall in particular take account of the Commission guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 and may also seek the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(4) of this Regulation. The Commission may propose to include the measures covered in that implementing act in the Council Military Requirements.4. The Commission may adopt, in close coordination with the relevant stakeholders, implementing acts to identify the basic protection and resilience measures for SDI, as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, and to identify the enhanced protection measures for SDI referred to in Article 24 of this Regulation. To this end, the Commission shall in particular take account of the Commission guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 and may also seek the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(4) of this Regulation. The Commission may propose to include the measures covered in that implementing act in the Council Military Requirements.

Or. it

Justification

We must lay down clear, binding measures if we wish to ensure harmonised implementation of the obligations imposed on infrastructure operators as well as legal certainty and proportionality.

Amendment 993

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The Commission may adopt implementing acts to identify the basic protection and resilience measures for SDI, as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, and to identify the enhanced protection measures for SDI referred to in Article 24 of this Regulation. To this end, the Commission shall in particular take account of the Commission guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 and may also seek the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(4) of this Regulation. The Commission may propose to include the measures covered in that implementing act in the Council Military Requirements.4. In cooperation with Member States, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts, as soon as possible, to identify the basic protection and resilience measures for SDI, as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, and to identify the enhanced protection measures for SDI referred to in Article 24 of this Regulation. To this end, the Commission shall in particular take account of the Commission guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 and may also seek the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the Committee established in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1679. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(4) of this Regulation. The Commission may propose to include the measures covered in that implementing act in the Council Military Requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 994

Özlem Demirel, Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Collective industrial action as well as collective or individual expressions of political opinions in the public sphere that take place in accordance with national law shall not be considered an event against which Member States or the Commission may take protection and resilience measures.

Or. en

Amendment 995

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Member States shall ensure that critical transport corridors have resilient secure communications services with redundancy and priority routing for military mobility traffic in crisis scenarios.

Or. en

Amendment 996

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Member States shall ensure that critical transport corridors have resilient secure communications services with redundancy and priority routing for military mobility traffic in crisis scenarios.

Or. en

Amendment 997

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan, Marion Maréchal

Proposal for a regulation

Article 34 – paragraph 4 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 b. The financing of the air navigation service providers designated as strategic dual-use infrastructure, all protection and resilience measures should be consistent with the provision related to the performance and charging scheme as per Regulation (EU) 2024/2803.

Or. en

Amendment 998

Stanislav Stoyanov, Volker Schnurrbusch, Milan Mazurek, Siegbert Frank Droese

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
[...]deleted

Or. en

Amendment 999

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Marion Maréchal, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States including, where applicable, capabilities supported or co-financed by the Union, without prejudice to Member States’ ownership and control of such capabilities. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The use of capabilities under the Solidarity Pool shall not affect national defence priorities and shall remain subject to the agreement of the Member State concerned. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1000

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński, Roberts Zīle, Alice Teodorescu Måwe

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and of the Union. Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty that are not Member States, as well as close partners like Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova, may also register their capabilities if they deem it appropriate. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1001

Özlem Demirel, Marc Botenga, Marina Mesure

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. Civilian workers and crews do not constitute capabilities that may be registered in the Pool. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1002

Cristian Terheş

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and NATO members may also register their capabilities. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1003

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. Ukraine may also register capabilities if it deems appropriate. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1004

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of contracted civil companies, of Member States, of Ukraine and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational with the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1005

Pekka Toveri

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered dual use capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1006

Alexandr Vondra, Marion Maréchal, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.1. The Solidarity Pool is established. It shall consist of a pool with a list of registered capabilities of Member States and possibly of the Union. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall consist of transport and logistic capabilities and shall be used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the execution of military transport operations. The Solidarity Pool shall become operational subject to the adoption by the Council of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.

Or. en

Amendment 1007

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1 a. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool and the allocation procedure set out in this article shall be complementary to and interoperable with the capabilities and assistance deployment procedure referred to in Regulation (2025/0223(COD)) on the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Or. en

Amendment 1008

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities.2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission shall define the types and specify the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities in the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15.
The Solidarity Pool shall at least comprise dual-mode locomotives, flat-bed wagons, strategic airlifts, air-to-air refueling, helicopters, abnormal transport capabilities, mobile cranes, trucks, container ships, tankers, battery powered ships, inland waterway vessels, fuels, biofuels and e-fuels production, storage, and distribution capabilities, road tanker, drones and robots.
When registering transport and logistic capabilities, the registering entity shall conclude a contract with qualified transport personnel responsible for operating such capabilities in the case where it is allocated in accordance with this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 1009

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities.2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities, taking into account the respective contributions of the Member States and their exposure to military transport flows, on the basis of a coordinated Union-wide needs and gap assessment, with the support of the Military Mobility Transport Group, the European Defence Agency and the EU Military Staff, and which provide a clear added value compared to existing capacity development mechanisms at European level.

Or. en

Amendment 1010

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities.2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities. Capabilities subject to effective or sufficiently substantiated doubts regarding third-country control shall not be registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1011

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities.2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities. Capabilities subject to effective or sufficiently substantiated doubts regarding third-country control shall not be registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1012

Cristian Terheş

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities.2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities including guidance on the acquisition, registration and distribution of such capabilities by the Union and Member States.

Or. en

Amendment 1013

Wouter Beke, Nicolás Pascual de la Parte, Michael Gahler

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities.2. Subject to the approval of the Military Mobility Transport Group, supported by the European Defence Agency, the European Union Military Staff, in consultation with NATO and based on the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission shall adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 1014

Pekka Toveri

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities.2. On the basis of the advice of the Military Mobility Transport Group and the results of the stress tests referred to in Article 43, the Commission may adopt guidelines defining the types and specifying the number of key dual use transport capabilities required for the Solidarity Pool to address the Union’s gaps in the area of military transport capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 1015

Cristian Terheş

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. Member States and, where applicable, the Union shall support the acquisition of transport and logistics capabilities to be registered in the Solidarity Pool, with a view to addressing identified gaps and strengthening collective preparedness. The Commission, in close cooperation with the Military Mobility Transport Group, shall ensure coordination, planning and coherence in the development and use of such capabilities, including clarifications regarding their command-and-control arrangements.

Or. en

Amendment 1016

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. By (1 year after the entry into force of this Regulation), the Commission shall adopt guidelines specifying the additional required measures to initiate, incentivise or develop collaborative industrial projects, joint procurements, concession contracts or public-private cooperations to reinforce the Union industrial base and address the Unions’s gap in the area of militray transport, including with the financial support of the European Competitiveness Fund.

Or. en

Amendment 1017

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 a. The Commission shall ensure that the distribution of the capacities and resources of the Solidarity Pool fairly reflects the needs and constraints of the Member States.

Or. en

Amendment 1018

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 b. Strategic decisions on the definition, prioritisation and use of Solidarity Pool capacities are taken in close coordination with the Member States, which retain a decisive role, while respecting their competences.

Or. en

Amendment 1019

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 2 c (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2 c. The identification of the necessary capacities for the Solidarity Pool should be undertaken as soon as possible, including before the entry into force of this Regulation, in order to ensure its rapid and effective implementation.

Or. en

Amendment 1020

Alexandr Vondra, Marion Maréchal, Michał Dworczyk

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The Solidarity Pool shall be operational 24 hours a day, seven days a week.3. The Solidarity Pool shall be operational 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The Solidarity Pool shall be supported by a secure digital catalogue and booking platform that provides visibility of pooled capabilities while enforcing role-based access control, mutual authentication and an immutable audit trail of offers, requests and allocations

Or. en

Amendment 1021

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. The participation of civilian operators in the Solidarity Pool is based on a clear and predictable legal framework that defines, in particular, liability regimes, insurance conditions, including those relating to war risks, compensation arrangements, and the applicable contractual and operational conditions.

Or. en

Amendment 1022

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 a. The Solidarity Pool shall be supported by a secure digital catalogue and booking platform that provides visibility of pooled capabilities while enforcing role-based access control, mutual authentication and an immutable audit trail of offers, requests and allocations.

Or. en

Amendment 1023

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 3 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3 b. The participation of civilian operators in the Solidarity Pool is based on the principle of voluntariness.

Or. en

Amendment 1024

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been newly acquired or contracted by Member States through dedicated Union programmes or financial instruments with the objective of pooling dual-use capabilities shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities used for civilian transport services, including services operated under public service obligations or existing commercial contracts, shall not be subject to mandatory registration.

Or. en

Justification

The effectiveness of the Solidarity Pool depends on the availability of additional dual-use capacities without undermining existing civilian, commercial or public service transport operations. Limiting mandatory registration to newly acquired, EU-financed assets preserves service continuity and market balance while supporting fleet renewal and industrial investment.

Amendment 1025

Dariusz Joński, Flavio Tosi, Michał Szczerba

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. It must be ensured that passenger services operating under Public Service Obligations (PSOs) are not adversely affected, and that no distortions of competition arise between market participants. Capabilities that have been newly acquired or contracted by Member States through dedicated EU programmes or financial instruments with the aim to pool dual use capabilities shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1026

Michał Szczerba, Dariusz Joński

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool, ensuring that the essential continuity of passenger services engaged in Public Services Obligation (PSOs) is safeguarded, and that the creation of market distortions between competitors is avoided. Capabilities of a dual-use nature that have been newly acquired or contracted by Member States through dedicated EU programmes aimed at pooling dual-use capabilities shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1027

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. It needs to be made sure that passenger services engaged in Public Services Obligation (PSOs) are not impacted and that the creation of market distortions between competitors is avoided. Capabilities that have been newly acquired or contracted by Member States through dedicated EU programmes or financial instrument with the aim to pool dual use capabilities shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1028

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. This contribution forms part of a coordinated and structured approach to ensure the availability of the necessary capacity to meet identified needs at Union level. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1029

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.4. Member States and Ukraine may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool, after consulting with the civil company owning such capabilities if applicable.

Or. en

Amendment 1030

Michał Dworczyk, Kosma Złotowski, Marion Maréchal, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding after the entry into force of this Regulation should, where appropriate, be registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1031

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been newly acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1032

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.4. Member States may voluntarily register their own capabilities in the Solidarity Pool. Capabilities that have been newly acquired or contracted by Member States with the financing support of any Union funding shall be registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1033

Nathalie Loiseau, Valérie Devaux

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Capabilities acquired or contracted by Member States and voluntarily registered in the Solidarity Pool may be withdrawn if necessary, provided that such withdrawal is communicated in advance and does not compromise ongoing military transport operations.

Or. en

Amendment 1034

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. Capabilities acquired or contracted by Member States and voluntarily registered in the Solidarity Pool may be withdrawn if necessary, provided that such withdrawal is communicated in advance and does not compromise ongoing military transport operations.

Or. en

Amendment 1035

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 a. The Solidarity Pool is supported by secure digital tools that ensure the visibility, coordination, and allocation of capabilities, in compliance with security and confidentiality requirements.

Or. en

Amendment 1036

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 4 b (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4 b. Capabilities acquired or contracted by Member States and voluntarily registered in the Solidarity Pool shall The capacities acquired by Member States that will be included in the solidarity pools must comply with all the eligibility criteria set out in Regulation (EU) No 2025/2643.

Or. en

Amendment 1037

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The registration of multinational capabilities provided by two or more Member States shall be undertaken jointly by all the Member States concerned or by any relevant entity.5. The registration of multinational capabilities provided by two or more Member States shall be undertaken jointly by all the Member States concerned.

Or. en

Amendment 1038

Vangelis Meimarakis, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The registration of multinational capabilities provided by two or more Member States shall be undertaken jointly by all the Member States concerned or by any relevant entity.5. The registration of multinational capabilities provided by two or more Member States shall be undertaken jointly by all the Member States concerned.

Or. en

Amendment 1039

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Subject to the availability of Union funding, Union capabilities may be procured with the objective of addressing the Union’s gaps in the area of transport capabilities, under conditions to be specified in the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15. Union capabilities shall be automatically registered in the Solidarity Pool.deleted

Or. en

Amendment 1040

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Subject to the availability of Union funding, Union capabilities may be procured with the objective of addressing the Union’s gaps in the area of transport capabilities, under conditions to be specified in the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15. Union capabilities shall be automatically registered in the Solidarity Pool.6. Subject to the availability of Union funding, Union capabilities may be procured with the objective of addressing the Union’s gaps in the area of transport capabilities, under conditions to be specified in the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15. Union capabilities shall be automatically registered in the Solidarity Pool. The conditions referred to in this paragraph shall at least include the following criterias :
- For procurements carried out pursuant to this Article which are supported by Union funding, the cost of components of the transport and logistic capabilities originating outside the Union shall not be higher than 35 % of the estimated cost of the components of the end product.
- For the purpose of a military transport operation supported by the Solidarity Pool, the transport and logistic capabilities used to guarantee, optimise and facilitate the operation shall not be subject to control by a non-associated third country or third-country entity.
- Logistic and transport capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be prohibited to use, install or integrate components from on high-risk suppliers in the meaning of Regulation 2026/0011(COD) (Cybersecurity act).
- The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall not be owned, leased, rented or otherwise contracted by a commercial operator established outside the Union.
- In order to be registered in the Solidarity Pool, helicopters, strategic airlifts and air-to-air refuelling capabilities shall be certified by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).

Or. en

Amendment 1041

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 6

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. Subject to the availability of Union funding, Union capabilities may be procured with the objective of addressing the Union’s gaps in the area of transport capabilities, under conditions to be specified in the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15. Union capabilities shall be automatically registered in the Solidarity Pool.6. Subject to the availability of Union funding, Union capabilities may be procured with the objective of addressing the Union’s gaps in the area of dual transport capabilities, under conditions to be specified in the implementing act referred to in paragraph 15. Union capabilities shall be automatically registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1042

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 6 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6 a. Where appropriate, the European Defence Agency shall support Member States in contracting and developing the capabilities necessary for the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1043

Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Vangelis Meimarakis

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool by Member States or the Union, or both, may comprise their own capabilities and those obtained through service contracts with commercial operators, where such contracts permit it.7. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool by Member States or the Union, or both, may comprise their own capabilities and those obtained through service contracts with commercial operators, where such contracts permit it. Inclusion of maritime assets shall be subject to clear contractual provisions covering legal status, liability and insurance coverage.

Or. en

Amendment 1044

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool by Member States or the Union, or both, may comprise their own capabilities and those obtained through service contracts with commercial operators, where such contracts permit it.7. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool by Member States, Ukraine or the Union, or both, may comprise their own capabilities and those obtained through service contracts with commercial operators, where such contracts permit it.

Or. en

Amendment 1045

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 7

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool by Member States or the Union, or both, may comprise their own capabilities and those obtained through service contracts with commercial operators, where such contracts permit it.7. The capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool by Member States may comprise their own capabilities and those obtained through service contracts with commercial operators, where such contracts permit it.

Or. en

Amendment 1046

Petras Auštrevičius, Valérie Devaux, Engin Eroglu, Lucia Yar, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7 a. Civilian operators included in the Solidarity Pool will be guided by legal provisions that clearly define contractual frameworks;

Or. en

Amendment 1047

Željana Zovko

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities. A request for support from the Solidarity Pool may also be submitted where a Member State requires transport and logistic capabilities to respond to a large-scale natural or man-made disaster and the capabilities available through the Union Civil Protection Mechanism are insufficient to meet the operational need.

Or. en

Justification

The Solidarity Pool is an instrument for addressing military transport capability gaps. However, the logistical capabilities registered in the Pool — heavy transport vehicles, specialist lifting equipment, mobile infrastructure — are precisely the assets most needed in large-scale natural disaster response. The Union Civil Protection Mechanism and rescEU provide a complementary framework but are limited to civilian assets and have demonstrated capacity constraints in major disaster scenarios. This single-sentence addition opens access to the Solidarity Pool for disaster response without restructuring the Pool or creating parallel command arrangements.

Amendment 1048

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request, also providing a dynamic capabilities registry with readiness levels of each capability classified according to NATO-compatible criteria: a) Fully ready, b) Available within X hours, c) Not available (maintenance/use). In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities. Where relevant, the concerned company owning the capability shall be involved.

Or. en

Amendment 1049

Nathalie Loiseau

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. A dynamic availability registry shall be established in order to differentiate registered capabilities based on their readiness status. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 1050

Valérie Devaux, Benoit Cassart, Asger Christensen, Petras Auštrevičius, Nathalie Loiseau, Jeannette Baljeu, Jan-Christoph Oetjen

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. A dynamic availability registry shall be established in order to differentiate registered capabilities based on their readiness status. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 1051

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and, where relevant, the Member State that has registered the capabilities. Where applicable, the transport operator or infrastructure manager owning or operating the capability shall be involved.

Or. en

Justification

Allocation decisions may have significant operational and economic impacts on the entities owning or operating the assets. Their involvement improves feasibility, legal certainty and acceptance of Solidarity Pool decisions.

Amendment 1052

Virginijus Sinkevičius, Mārtiņš Staķis

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities. Where relevant, the concerned company owning the capability may be included in the deliberations.

Or. en

Amendment 1053

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States or Ukraine to the Commission one-stop-shop unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States or associated countries, the Commission and where relevant the Member State or associated countries that has registered the capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 1054

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member State to the Commission, provided that such capabilities are effectively available and operational. A dynamic registry indicating the readiness level of each registered capability shall be maintained, using NATO-compatible readiness criteria.

Or. en

Justification

Not all registered assets are continuously operational, due for example to maintenance or ongoing civilian use. A dynamic registry of readiness levels increases transparency, prevents unrealistic planning assumptions and improves operational reliability of the Solidarity Pool.

Amendment 1055

Michał Dworczyk, Alexandr Vondra, Kosma Złotowski, Adam Bielan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and where relevant the Member State that has registered the capabilities.8. Capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool shall be available for support following a request made by a requesting Member States to the Commission unless such capabilities are already used to support another request. In the event of competing requests, any decisions to allocate the capabilities shall be taken, in close coordination between the requesting Member States, the Commission and the Member State that has registered the capabilities.

Or. en

Amendment 1056

Carlo Fidanza, Alberico Gambino, Carlo Ciccioli, Elena Donazzan

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 a. The Union shall support dedicated programmes for training, reskilling and joint exercises related to the operation of dual-use transport and logistic capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool, with a view to ensuring their effective and safe use in military transport operations.

Or. en

Amendment 1057

François Kalfon, Andreas Schieder, Marianne Vind, Jean-Marc Germain

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 a. Member States shall take the necessary measures to incentivise the provision, for a reasonable cost, of insurance schemes against war and natural disaster risks in the whole Union to civil companies operating the logisctic and transport capabilities registered in the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en

Amendment 1058

Elio Di Rupo, José Cepeda

Proposal for a regulation

Article 35 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8 a. The Commission acts in coordination with the Member States to ensure efficient and prioritised use of the capacity of the Solidarity Pool.

Or. en